I have two passports/nationalities. How do I use them when I travel?
I am a citizen of two different countries, and have two passports. How should I use my passports when traveling?
customs-and-immigration passports dual-nationality
add a comment |
I am a citizen of two different countries, and have two passports. How should I use my passports when traveling?
customs-and-immigration passports dual-nationality
8
See also travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3515/…
– Relaxed
Aug 14 '15 at 22:54
3
@Relaxed This is intended as the canonical Q&A for this FAQ, see: meta.travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3283/…
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:19
This question was properly put forward in META and agreed upon either by comment or answer or general apathy. We should be using this question as the controlling reference for future questions matching this one. @jpatokal
– Gayot Fow
Aug 16 '15 at 12:54
are those 2 passports somehow bringing the same group of facts? e.g. are those 2 from commonwealth countries(Canada / Australia) are those from the EU (Austria / Spain) ?????
– ΦXocę 웃 Пepeúpa ツ
Sep 7 '17 at 12:29
add a comment |
I am a citizen of two different countries, and have two passports. How should I use my passports when traveling?
customs-and-immigration passports dual-nationality
I am a citizen of two different countries, and have two passports. How should I use my passports when traveling?
customs-and-immigration passports dual-nationality
customs-and-immigration passports dual-nationality
asked Aug 1 '15 at 11:19
jpatokaljpatokal
117k18375533
117k18375533
8
See also travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3515/…
– Relaxed
Aug 14 '15 at 22:54
3
@Relaxed This is intended as the canonical Q&A for this FAQ, see: meta.travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3283/…
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:19
This question was properly put forward in META and agreed upon either by comment or answer or general apathy. We should be using this question as the controlling reference for future questions matching this one. @jpatokal
– Gayot Fow
Aug 16 '15 at 12:54
are those 2 passports somehow bringing the same group of facts? e.g. are those 2 from commonwealth countries(Canada / Australia) are those from the EU (Austria / Spain) ?????
– ΦXocę 웃 Пepeúpa ツ
Sep 7 '17 at 12:29
add a comment |
8
See also travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3515/…
– Relaxed
Aug 14 '15 at 22:54
3
@Relaxed This is intended as the canonical Q&A for this FAQ, see: meta.travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3283/…
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:19
This question was properly put forward in META and agreed upon either by comment or answer or general apathy. We should be using this question as the controlling reference for future questions matching this one. @jpatokal
– Gayot Fow
Aug 16 '15 at 12:54
are those 2 passports somehow bringing the same group of facts? e.g. are those 2 from commonwealth countries(Canada / Australia) are those from the EU (Austria / Spain) ?????
– ΦXocę 웃 Пepeúpa ツ
Sep 7 '17 at 12:29
8
8
See also travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3515/…
– Relaxed
Aug 14 '15 at 22:54
See also travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3515/…
– Relaxed
Aug 14 '15 at 22:54
3
3
@Relaxed This is intended as the canonical Q&A for this FAQ, see: meta.travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3283/…
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:19
@Relaxed This is intended as the canonical Q&A for this FAQ, see: meta.travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3283/…
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:19
This question was properly put forward in META and agreed upon either by comment or answer or general apathy. We should be using this question as the controlling reference for future questions matching this one. @jpatokal
– Gayot Fow
Aug 16 '15 at 12:54
This question was properly put forward in META and agreed upon either by comment or answer or general apathy. We should be using this question as the controlling reference for future questions matching this one. @jpatokal
– Gayot Fow
Aug 16 '15 at 12:54
are those 2 passports somehow bringing the same group of facts? e.g. are those 2 from commonwealth countries(Canada / Australia) are those from the EU (Austria / Spain) ?????
– ΦXocę 웃 Пepeúpa ツ
Sep 7 '17 at 12:29
are those 2 passports somehow bringing the same group of facts? e.g. are those 2 from commonwealth countries(Canada / Australia) are those from the EU (Austria / Spain) ?????
– ΦXocę 웃 Пepeúpa ツ
Sep 7 '17 at 12:29
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
This is a common situation, and it's generally no problem. I'll use A for the country you're in, and B for the country you're going to, but all the "flows" described here work equally well if you want to use your B passport to go to a third country.
Case 1: Same name, dual citizenship OK
If you have the same name in both passports (that is, same first name and last name, minor variations are OK), and both countries accept dual citizenship (if you're not sure, find out here), the basic formula is:
- Show the airline the passport of the country you're going to
- Show immigration the passport for the country you're in
In step-by-step detail, when flying from A to B and back:
- At check-in, show your B passport. This way the airline knows you will be allowed to enter your destination.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport. (In countries without exit immigration, like the US, you may need to show A as well at check-in.)
- At the gate, show either passport, doesn't matter.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your B passport.
And on the way back from B to A, just reverse the process:
- At check-in, show your A passport. This way the airline knows you will be allowed to enter your destination.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- At the gate, show either passport, doesn't matter.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your A passport.
Pictorial representation for a UK/US dual citizen visiting the US, courtesy @GayotFow:
Case 2: Different names, dual citizenship OK
If your names are different, but your countries are OK with each other:
- Book your flight with the name on your A passport.
- At airline check-in, show your A passport that matches the name on your ticket, and your B passport, that proves you're allowed to enter.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport.
- At the gate, show your A passport, so that your name matches your ticket.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your B passport.
- On the way back, at check-in, show your A passport only.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- At the gate, show your A passport, so that your name matches your ticket.
- Fly back.
- On arrival immigration, show your A passport.
Case 3: Same name, dual citizenship not OK
Things get harder if one or both your countries does not accept dual citizenship, especially if they care enough to look for visas or arrival stamps. The key thing to understand here is that the airline is not a part of immigration. They do not care if you have multiple passports and they are not going to tell immigration if you do, all they want to know if whether you will be allowed in at your destination.
So here's one way to avoid letting A know you are also a citizen of B (but B will know you've come from A):
- Book a flight from A to B via a neutral third country C, where you do not need a visa. (For example, Malaysia does not accept dual citizenship, so dual-citizen Malaysians often travel via Singapore.)
- On check-in, show your A passport.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport.
- Fly to C.
- Connect to your flight to B.
- At arrival immigration, show your B passport.
On the way back, though, you will need a short detour:
- At check in, show your B passport.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- Fly to C.
- On arrival at C, do not go to transfer, but instead go to immigration, show your A passport and get it stamped. (Leave enough time for this!)
- If you need to check-in again, show your A passport.
- At C's exit immigration, show your A passport again and get it stamped again.
- Fly to A.
- At arrival immigration, show your A passport. This will have a departure stamp from C, neatly hiding that you were actually in B.
Beware that this is not totally foolproof, as a very careful inspection of your stamps will reveal that you were not in C for the whole time, but unless you're North Korean, it's unlikely you will be subjected to this level of scrutiny. Some people choose to go through immigration in C on the way out as well, so they get more decoy stamps. Doing that is necessary if you also want country B not to know that you've come from A (making the scenario symmetric).
Case 4: Different names, dual citizenship not OK
If you have different names and your countries don't like each other, you can still use the same method as above, but you'll likely need to book your A-C-A flight in your "A" name and your C-B-C flight in your "B" name.
20
Great info that works well when flying, but not always overland. 3rd world and developing nations sometimes check to see that you exited the previous country legally and are not fleeing something. So playing musical passports during a multi country driving trip requires a little more pre-trip country specific research (just a warning from a lesson learned the hard way ;-).
– user13044
Aug 1 '15 at 13:59
1
Small improvement suggestion: Case 1, step 3: Show passport B. In my experience it does matter, at least in one case.
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 19:57
2
@jpatokal: One time I was called up to the counter at the gate on international departure from LAX. The airline wanted to double check my passport, because they only had the details for the passport A which I used to enter the US, but they wanted to confirm that I had documentation for my destination (passport B). My original motivation for using my passport A was to ensure that the US recorded my departure correctly. (I confirmed that they did, by looking up my I-94 online after I returned home. They probably connected my details for passports A and B.)
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 23:35
4
@jpatokal The picture is not correct for another reason. In the general case, you should show the airline the passport of the country you are flying to, since they need that information to determine whether they should let you board or not. So the "Airline check in" part of the image on the US side should show "UK passport" not "US passport". (In the case of a UK/US dual citizen the point is moot, since US citizens don't need a visa to go to the UK, but this answer is supposed to be general.)
– Alan Munn
Jan 25 '16 at 16:24
1
@AlanMunn since I-94 records are tied to passport number, it's almost certainly done by passport number. Otherwise it would be impossible to guarantee a unique match. How many Alan Munns are there in the world?
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 17:54
|
show 23 more comments
I have the same situation and have traveled extensively. There where a few reasons why to use two passports on one trip:
- Exiting one country which I have a passport to and entering the other country to which I am a citizen (must use the right passport for each country).
- Was running out of space for stamps on the passport (just lazy to get a new one)
- Going out of one country where I had a visa and into another where I didn't need a visa on my other passport.
Usually I would try to use only one passport during a trip, if you must use two it's usually not a problem, you can just show both at check in (if needed) and at immigration (if asked).
I was pulled aside one time in Hong Kong, mostly since my first name is spelled differently in both passports, after a short explanation I was sent on my way.
It's only problematic if you hold a passport to a country that is refused entry (e.g. going to Malaysia with an Israeli passport) and try to enter with your other passport. I would highly advice against this.
Safe travels!
add a comment |
Most commonly this is an issue when travelling between the countries of your nationality, which has been well-answered by other people. Otherwise, it may be an issue if you have visa-free travel to a particular third country under one nationality and not the other - in which case, obviously, use the passport that you don't need a visa in.
There is the case where you're travelling to a country that one of your nationalities doesn't get on with, in which case you can travel on your other passport. The obvious examples here are North Korea on a South Korean passport and parts of the Arab world on an Israeli passport. I would strongly suggest not using a second nationality in cases where you're facing that level of hostility; if you're exposed then you could be in real physical danger or danger of arrest.
But there's another case where having multiple nationalities is useful.
On most Western passports, you can travel to Israel; you can also travel to most of the Arab world. But if you try entering certain Arab countries with an Israeli stamp in your passport, then you'll be refused entry.
If you have two passports, you can have stamps for Israel (and Jordan and Egypt if you enter across the land border from Israel) in one passport and those for the (rest of the) Arab world on the other. While some countries will issue you with two passports, it's a lot easier to keep them apart if you have two different nationalities (you're a lot less likely to pick up the wrong one by mistake).
add a comment |
The anser to your question can depend on the countries involved. For example, a US State Department website says this about dual citizenship Israeli-Americans:
"Israeli citizens naturalized in the United States retain their Israeli citizenship, and children born in the United States to Israeli parents usually acquire both U.S. and Israeli nationality at birth. Israeli citizens, including dual nationals, must enter and depart Israel on their Israeli passports."
Source: travel.state.gov
3
That's actually entirely standard for travel as a dual citizen, and is accounted for in the "Case 1" answer.
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:20
@jpatokal Perhaps it is just me, but I do not see that in Case 1. The first #2 seems to say the opposite.
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 1:01
Case 1 boils down to "show immigration the passport for the country you're in, and show the airline the passport of the country you're going to". I think I'll add that as a summary...
– jpatokal
Aug 16 '15 at 12:40
1
You seem to be using the term "immigration" to refer to the exit/entry officials in the country that you reside. If so, is that standard usage?
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 13:40
1
@jpatokal it's also commonly used by governments. The UK has "immigration officers," and before the founding of the Department of Homeland Security, the US Immigration and Naturalization service employed, if I recall correctly, "immigration inspectors" to process people arriving in the country -- regardless of whether they were citizens, returning immigrants, new immigrants, or non-immigrants. Now their official title is that of "Customs and Border Protection Officer."
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 15:51
|
show 1 more comment
A wrinkle I just encountered is that some electronic passport readers appear to be linked to departure records. I was travelling from New Zealand to the UK, and have ePassports for both (case 1 of the accepted answer). I showed my UK passport to the airline agent checking me in, and then attempted to use my NZ passport in the passport reader at the immigration control point. It did not work, and I had to use my UK passport instead.
Had you entered NZ using the NZ passport? If so, did anyone ask about the lack of an entry record for your UK passport?
– phoog
Oct 3 '17 at 20:21
I last entered NZ using the NZ passport, as I'd used it to travel to Australia. The immigration agent only asked me if I had another passport, and when that let me through the gate, he was satisfied. I find that odd, as there are emigration restrictions in NZ - you can't leave if you have unpaid parking tickets, for example.
– Rupert Morrish
Oct 3 '17 at 20:36
add a comment |
protected by Michael Hampton Nov 14 '16 at 23:29
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is a common situation, and it's generally no problem. I'll use A for the country you're in, and B for the country you're going to, but all the "flows" described here work equally well if you want to use your B passport to go to a third country.
Case 1: Same name, dual citizenship OK
If you have the same name in both passports (that is, same first name and last name, minor variations are OK), and both countries accept dual citizenship (if you're not sure, find out here), the basic formula is:
- Show the airline the passport of the country you're going to
- Show immigration the passport for the country you're in
In step-by-step detail, when flying from A to B and back:
- At check-in, show your B passport. This way the airline knows you will be allowed to enter your destination.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport. (In countries without exit immigration, like the US, you may need to show A as well at check-in.)
- At the gate, show either passport, doesn't matter.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your B passport.
And on the way back from B to A, just reverse the process:
- At check-in, show your A passport. This way the airline knows you will be allowed to enter your destination.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- At the gate, show either passport, doesn't matter.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your A passport.
Pictorial representation for a UK/US dual citizen visiting the US, courtesy @GayotFow:
Case 2: Different names, dual citizenship OK
If your names are different, but your countries are OK with each other:
- Book your flight with the name on your A passport.
- At airline check-in, show your A passport that matches the name on your ticket, and your B passport, that proves you're allowed to enter.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport.
- At the gate, show your A passport, so that your name matches your ticket.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your B passport.
- On the way back, at check-in, show your A passport only.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- At the gate, show your A passport, so that your name matches your ticket.
- Fly back.
- On arrival immigration, show your A passport.
Case 3: Same name, dual citizenship not OK
Things get harder if one or both your countries does not accept dual citizenship, especially if they care enough to look for visas or arrival stamps. The key thing to understand here is that the airline is not a part of immigration. They do not care if you have multiple passports and they are not going to tell immigration if you do, all they want to know if whether you will be allowed in at your destination.
So here's one way to avoid letting A know you are also a citizen of B (but B will know you've come from A):
- Book a flight from A to B via a neutral third country C, where you do not need a visa. (For example, Malaysia does not accept dual citizenship, so dual-citizen Malaysians often travel via Singapore.)
- On check-in, show your A passport.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport.
- Fly to C.
- Connect to your flight to B.
- At arrival immigration, show your B passport.
On the way back, though, you will need a short detour:
- At check in, show your B passport.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- Fly to C.
- On arrival at C, do not go to transfer, but instead go to immigration, show your A passport and get it stamped. (Leave enough time for this!)
- If you need to check-in again, show your A passport.
- At C's exit immigration, show your A passport again and get it stamped again.
- Fly to A.
- At arrival immigration, show your A passport. This will have a departure stamp from C, neatly hiding that you were actually in B.
Beware that this is not totally foolproof, as a very careful inspection of your stamps will reveal that you were not in C for the whole time, but unless you're North Korean, it's unlikely you will be subjected to this level of scrutiny. Some people choose to go through immigration in C on the way out as well, so they get more decoy stamps. Doing that is necessary if you also want country B not to know that you've come from A (making the scenario symmetric).
Case 4: Different names, dual citizenship not OK
If you have different names and your countries don't like each other, you can still use the same method as above, but you'll likely need to book your A-C-A flight in your "A" name and your C-B-C flight in your "B" name.
20
Great info that works well when flying, but not always overland. 3rd world and developing nations sometimes check to see that you exited the previous country legally and are not fleeing something. So playing musical passports during a multi country driving trip requires a little more pre-trip country specific research (just a warning from a lesson learned the hard way ;-).
– user13044
Aug 1 '15 at 13:59
1
Small improvement suggestion: Case 1, step 3: Show passport B. In my experience it does matter, at least in one case.
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 19:57
2
@jpatokal: One time I was called up to the counter at the gate on international departure from LAX. The airline wanted to double check my passport, because they only had the details for the passport A which I used to enter the US, but they wanted to confirm that I had documentation for my destination (passport B). My original motivation for using my passport A was to ensure that the US recorded my departure correctly. (I confirmed that they did, by looking up my I-94 online after I returned home. They probably connected my details for passports A and B.)
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 23:35
4
@jpatokal The picture is not correct for another reason. In the general case, you should show the airline the passport of the country you are flying to, since they need that information to determine whether they should let you board or not. So the "Airline check in" part of the image on the US side should show "UK passport" not "US passport". (In the case of a UK/US dual citizen the point is moot, since US citizens don't need a visa to go to the UK, but this answer is supposed to be general.)
– Alan Munn
Jan 25 '16 at 16:24
1
@AlanMunn since I-94 records are tied to passport number, it's almost certainly done by passport number. Otherwise it would be impossible to guarantee a unique match. How many Alan Munns are there in the world?
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 17:54
|
show 23 more comments
This is a common situation, and it's generally no problem. I'll use A for the country you're in, and B for the country you're going to, but all the "flows" described here work equally well if you want to use your B passport to go to a third country.
Case 1: Same name, dual citizenship OK
If you have the same name in both passports (that is, same first name and last name, minor variations are OK), and both countries accept dual citizenship (if you're not sure, find out here), the basic formula is:
- Show the airline the passport of the country you're going to
- Show immigration the passport for the country you're in
In step-by-step detail, when flying from A to B and back:
- At check-in, show your B passport. This way the airline knows you will be allowed to enter your destination.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport. (In countries without exit immigration, like the US, you may need to show A as well at check-in.)
- At the gate, show either passport, doesn't matter.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your B passport.
And on the way back from B to A, just reverse the process:
- At check-in, show your A passport. This way the airline knows you will be allowed to enter your destination.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- At the gate, show either passport, doesn't matter.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your A passport.
Pictorial representation for a UK/US dual citizen visiting the US, courtesy @GayotFow:
Case 2: Different names, dual citizenship OK
If your names are different, but your countries are OK with each other:
- Book your flight with the name on your A passport.
- At airline check-in, show your A passport that matches the name on your ticket, and your B passport, that proves you're allowed to enter.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport.
- At the gate, show your A passport, so that your name matches your ticket.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your B passport.
- On the way back, at check-in, show your A passport only.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- At the gate, show your A passport, so that your name matches your ticket.
- Fly back.
- On arrival immigration, show your A passport.
Case 3: Same name, dual citizenship not OK
Things get harder if one or both your countries does not accept dual citizenship, especially if they care enough to look for visas or arrival stamps. The key thing to understand here is that the airline is not a part of immigration. They do not care if you have multiple passports and they are not going to tell immigration if you do, all they want to know if whether you will be allowed in at your destination.
So here's one way to avoid letting A know you are also a citizen of B (but B will know you've come from A):
- Book a flight from A to B via a neutral third country C, where you do not need a visa. (For example, Malaysia does not accept dual citizenship, so dual-citizen Malaysians often travel via Singapore.)
- On check-in, show your A passport.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport.
- Fly to C.
- Connect to your flight to B.
- At arrival immigration, show your B passport.
On the way back, though, you will need a short detour:
- At check in, show your B passport.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- Fly to C.
- On arrival at C, do not go to transfer, but instead go to immigration, show your A passport and get it stamped. (Leave enough time for this!)
- If you need to check-in again, show your A passport.
- At C's exit immigration, show your A passport again and get it stamped again.
- Fly to A.
- At arrival immigration, show your A passport. This will have a departure stamp from C, neatly hiding that you were actually in B.
Beware that this is not totally foolproof, as a very careful inspection of your stamps will reveal that you were not in C for the whole time, but unless you're North Korean, it's unlikely you will be subjected to this level of scrutiny. Some people choose to go through immigration in C on the way out as well, so they get more decoy stamps. Doing that is necessary if you also want country B not to know that you've come from A (making the scenario symmetric).
Case 4: Different names, dual citizenship not OK
If you have different names and your countries don't like each other, you can still use the same method as above, but you'll likely need to book your A-C-A flight in your "A" name and your C-B-C flight in your "B" name.
20
Great info that works well when flying, but not always overland. 3rd world and developing nations sometimes check to see that you exited the previous country legally and are not fleeing something. So playing musical passports during a multi country driving trip requires a little more pre-trip country specific research (just a warning from a lesson learned the hard way ;-).
– user13044
Aug 1 '15 at 13:59
1
Small improvement suggestion: Case 1, step 3: Show passport B. In my experience it does matter, at least in one case.
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 19:57
2
@jpatokal: One time I was called up to the counter at the gate on international departure from LAX. The airline wanted to double check my passport, because they only had the details for the passport A which I used to enter the US, but they wanted to confirm that I had documentation for my destination (passport B). My original motivation for using my passport A was to ensure that the US recorded my departure correctly. (I confirmed that they did, by looking up my I-94 online after I returned home. They probably connected my details for passports A and B.)
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 23:35
4
@jpatokal The picture is not correct for another reason. In the general case, you should show the airline the passport of the country you are flying to, since they need that information to determine whether they should let you board or not. So the "Airline check in" part of the image on the US side should show "UK passport" not "US passport". (In the case of a UK/US dual citizen the point is moot, since US citizens don't need a visa to go to the UK, but this answer is supposed to be general.)
– Alan Munn
Jan 25 '16 at 16:24
1
@AlanMunn since I-94 records are tied to passport number, it's almost certainly done by passport number. Otherwise it would be impossible to guarantee a unique match. How many Alan Munns are there in the world?
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 17:54
|
show 23 more comments
This is a common situation, and it's generally no problem. I'll use A for the country you're in, and B for the country you're going to, but all the "flows" described here work equally well if you want to use your B passport to go to a third country.
Case 1: Same name, dual citizenship OK
If you have the same name in both passports (that is, same first name and last name, minor variations are OK), and both countries accept dual citizenship (if you're not sure, find out here), the basic formula is:
- Show the airline the passport of the country you're going to
- Show immigration the passport for the country you're in
In step-by-step detail, when flying from A to B and back:
- At check-in, show your B passport. This way the airline knows you will be allowed to enter your destination.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport. (In countries without exit immigration, like the US, you may need to show A as well at check-in.)
- At the gate, show either passport, doesn't matter.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your B passport.
And on the way back from B to A, just reverse the process:
- At check-in, show your A passport. This way the airline knows you will be allowed to enter your destination.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- At the gate, show either passport, doesn't matter.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your A passport.
Pictorial representation for a UK/US dual citizen visiting the US, courtesy @GayotFow:
Case 2: Different names, dual citizenship OK
If your names are different, but your countries are OK with each other:
- Book your flight with the name on your A passport.
- At airline check-in, show your A passport that matches the name on your ticket, and your B passport, that proves you're allowed to enter.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport.
- At the gate, show your A passport, so that your name matches your ticket.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your B passport.
- On the way back, at check-in, show your A passport only.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- At the gate, show your A passport, so that your name matches your ticket.
- Fly back.
- On arrival immigration, show your A passport.
Case 3: Same name, dual citizenship not OK
Things get harder if one or both your countries does not accept dual citizenship, especially if they care enough to look for visas or arrival stamps. The key thing to understand here is that the airline is not a part of immigration. They do not care if you have multiple passports and they are not going to tell immigration if you do, all they want to know if whether you will be allowed in at your destination.
So here's one way to avoid letting A know you are also a citizen of B (but B will know you've come from A):
- Book a flight from A to B via a neutral third country C, where you do not need a visa. (For example, Malaysia does not accept dual citizenship, so dual-citizen Malaysians often travel via Singapore.)
- On check-in, show your A passport.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport.
- Fly to C.
- Connect to your flight to B.
- At arrival immigration, show your B passport.
On the way back, though, you will need a short detour:
- At check in, show your B passport.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- Fly to C.
- On arrival at C, do not go to transfer, but instead go to immigration, show your A passport and get it stamped. (Leave enough time for this!)
- If you need to check-in again, show your A passport.
- At C's exit immigration, show your A passport again and get it stamped again.
- Fly to A.
- At arrival immigration, show your A passport. This will have a departure stamp from C, neatly hiding that you were actually in B.
Beware that this is not totally foolproof, as a very careful inspection of your stamps will reveal that you were not in C for the whole time, but unless you're North Korean, it's unlikely you will be subjected to this level of scrutiny. Some people choose to go through immigration in C on the way out as well, so they get more decoy stamps. Doing that is necessary if you also want country B not to know that you've come from A (making the scenario symmetric).
Case 4: Different names, dual citizenship not OK
If you have different names and your countries don't like each other, you can still use the same method as above, but you'll likely need to book your A-C-A flight in your "A" name and your C-B-C flight in your "B" name.
This is a common situation, and it's generally no problem. I'll use A for the country you're in, and B for the country you're going to, but all the "flows" described here work equally well if you want to use your B passport to go to a third country.
Case 1: Same name, dual citizenship OK
If you have the same name in both passports (that is, same first name and last name, minor variations are OK), and both countries accept dual citizenship (if you're not sure, find out here), the basic formula is:
- Show the airline the passport of the country you're going to
- Show immigration the passport for the country you're in
In step-by-step detail, when flying from A to B and back:
- At check-in, show your B passport. This way the airline knows you will be allowed to enter your destination.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport. (In countries without exit immigration, like the US, you may need to show A as well at check-in.)
- At the gate, show either passport, doesn't matter.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your B passport.
And on the way back from B to A, just reverse the process:
- At check-in, show your A passport. This way the airline knows you will be allowed to enter your destination.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- At the gate, show either passport, doesn't matter.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your A passport.
Pictorial representation for a UK/US dual citizen visiting the US, courtesy @GayotFow:
Case 2: Different names, dual citizenship OK
If your names are different, but your countries are OK with each other:
- Book your flight with the name on your A passport.
- At airline check-in, show your A passport that matches the name on your ticket, and your B passport, that proves you're allowed to enter.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport.
- At the gate, show your A passport, so that your name matches your ticket.
- Fly.
- On arrival immigration, show your B passport.
- On the way back, at check-in, show your A passport only.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- At the gate, show your A passport, so that your name matches your ticket.
- Fly back.
- On arrival immigration, show your A passport.
Case 3: Same name, dual citizenship not OK
Things get harder if one or both your countries does not accept dual citizenship, especially if they care enough to look for visas or arrival stamps. The key thing to understand here is that the airline is not a part of immigration. They do not care if you have multiple passports and they are not going to tell immigration if you do, all they want to know if whether you will be allowed in at your destination.
So here's one way to avoid letting A know you are also a citizen of B (but B will know you've come from A):
- Book a flight from A to B via a neutral third country C, where you do not need a visa. (For example, Malaysia does not accept dual citizenship, so dual-citizen Malaysians often travel via Singapore.)
- On check-in, show your A passport.
- At exit immigration, show your A passport.
- Fly to C.
- Connect to your flight to B.
- At arrival immigration, show your B passport.
On the way back, though, you will need a short detour:
- At check in, show your B passport.
- At exit immigration, show your B passport.
- Fly to C.
- On arrival at C, do not go to transfer, but instead go to immigration, show your A passport and get it stamped. (Leave enough time for this!)
- If you need to check-in again, show your A passport.
- At C's exit immigration, show your A passport again and get it stamped again.
- Fly to A.
- At arrival immigration, show your A passport. This will have a departure stamp from C, neatly hiding that you were actually in B.
Beware that this is not totally foolproof, as a very careful inspection of your stamps will reveal that you were not in C for the whole time, but unless you're North Korean, it's unlikely you will be subjected to this level of scrutiny. Some people choose to go through immigration in C on the way out as well, so they get more decoy stamps. Doing that is necessary if you also want country B not to know that you've come from A (making the scenario symmetric).
Case 4: Different names, dual citizenship not OK
If you have different names and your countries don't like each other, you can still use the same method as above, but you'll likely need to book your A-C-A flight in your "A" name and your C-B-C flight in your "B" name.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:52
community wiki
9 revs, 3 users 98%
jpatokal
20
Great info that works well when flying, but not always overland. 3rd world and developing nations sometimes check to see that you exited the previous country legally and are not fleeing something. So playing musical passports during a multi country driving trip requires a little more pre-trip country specific research (just a warning from a lesson learned the hard way ;-).
– user13044
Aug 1 '15 at 13:59
1
Small improvement suggestion: Case 1, step 3: Show passport B. In my experience it does matter, at least in one case.
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 19:57
2
@jpatokal: One time I was called up to the counter at the gate on international departure from LAX. The airline wanted to double check my passport, because they only had the details for the passport A which I used to enter the US, but they wanted to confirm that I had documentation for my destination (passport B). My original motivation for using my passport A was to ensure that the US recorded my departure correctly. (I confirmed that they did, by looking up my I-94 online after I returned home. They probably connected my details for passports A and B.)
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 23:35
4
@jpatokal The picture is not correct for another reason. In the general case, you should show the airline the passport of the country you are flying to, since they need that information to determine whether they should let you board or not. So the "Airline check in" part of the image on the US side should show "UK passport" not "US passport". (In the case of a UK/US dual citizen the point is moot, since US citizens don't need a visa to go to the UK, but this answer is supposed to be general.)
– Alan Munn
Jan 25 '16 at 16:24
1
@AlanMunn since I-94 records are tied to passport number, it's almost certainly done by passport number. Otherwise it would be impossible to guarantee a unique match. How many Alan Munns are there in the world?
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 17:54
|
show 23 more comments
20
Great info that works well when flying, but not always overland. 3rd world and developing nations sometimes check to see that you exited the previous country legally and are not fleeing something. So playing musical passports during a multi country driving trip requires a little more pre-trip country specific research (just a warning from a lesson learned the hard way ;-).
– user13044
Aug 1 '15 at 13:59
1
Small improvement suggestion: Case 1, step 3: Show passport B. In my experience it does matter, at least in one case.
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 19:57
2
@jpatokal: One time I was called up to the counter at the gate on international departure from LAX. The airline wanted to double check my passport, because they only had the details for the passport A which I used to enter the US, but they wanted to confirm that I had documentation for my destination (passport B). My original motivation for using my passport A was to ensure that the US recorded my departure correctly. (I confirmed that they did, by looking up my I-94 online after I returned home. They probably connected my details for passports A and B.)
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 23:35
4
@jpatokal The picture is not correct for another reason. In the general case, you should show the airline the passport of the country you are flying to, since they need that information to determine whether they should let you board or not. So the "Airline check in" part of the image on the US side should show "UK passport" not "US passport". (In the case of a UK/US dual citizen the point is moot, since US citizens don't need a visa to go to the UK, but this answer is supposed to be general.)
– Alan Munn
Jan 25 '16 at 16:24
1
@AlanMunn since I-94 records are tied to passport number, it's almost certainly done by passport number. Otherwise it would be impossible to guarantee a unique match. How many Alan Munns are there in the world?
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 17:54
20
20
Great info that works well when flying, but not always overland. 3rd world and developing nations sometimes check to see that you exited the previous country legally and are not fleeing something. So playing musical passports during a multi country driving trip requires a little more pre-trip country specific research (just a warning from a lesson learned the hard way ;-).
– user13044
Aug 1 '15 at 13:59
Great info that works well when flying, but not always overland. 3rd world and developing nations sometimes check to see that you exited the previous country legally and are not fleeing something. So playing musical passports during a multi country driving trip requires a little more pre-trip country specific research (just a warning from a lesson learned the hard way ;-).
– user13044
Aug 1 '15 at 13:59
1
1
Small improvement suggestion: Case 1, step 3: Show passport B. In my experience it does matter, at least in one case.
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 19:57
Small improvement suggestion: Case 1, step 3: Show passport B. In my experience it does matter, at least in one case.
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 19:57
2
2
@jpatokal: One time I was called up to the counter at the gate on international departure from LAX. The airline wanted to double check my passport, because they only had the details for the passport A which I used to enter the US, but they wanted to confirm that I had documentation for my destination (passport B). My original motivation for using my passport A was to ensure that the US recorded my departure correctly. (I confirmed that they did, by looking up my I-94 online after I returned home. They probably connected my details for passports A and B.)
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 23:35
@jpatokal: One time I was called up to the counter at the gate on international departure from LAX. The airline wanted to double check my passport, because they only had the details for the passport A which I used to enter the US, but they wanted to confirm that I had documentation for my destination (passport B). My original motivation for using my passport A was to ensure that the US recorded my departure correctly. (I confirmed that they did, by looking up my I-94 online after I returned home. They probably connected my details for passports A and B.)
– Greg Hewgill
Aug 2 '15 at 23:35
4
4
@jpatokal The picture is not correct for another reason. In the general case, you should show the airline the passport of the country you are flying to, since they need that information to determine whether they should let you board or not. So the "Airline check in" part of the image on the US side should show "UK passport" not "US passport". (In the case of a UK/US dual citizen the point is moot, since US citizens don't need a visa to go to the UK, but this answer is supposed to be general.)
– Alan Munn
Jan 25 '16 at 16:24
@jpatokal The picture is not correct for another reason. In the general case, you should show the airline the passport of the country you are flying to, since they need that information to determine whether they should let you board or not. So the "Airline check in" part of the image on the US side should show "UK passport" not "US passport". (In the case of a UK/US dual citizen the point is moot, since US citizens don't need a visa to go to the UK, but this answer is supposed to be general.)
– Alan Munn
Jan 25 '16 at 16:24
1
1
@AlanMunn since I-94 records are tied to passport number, it's almost certainly done by passport number. Otherwise it would be impossible to guarantee a unique match. How many Alan Munns are there in the world?
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 17:54
@AlanMunn since I-94 records are tied to passport number, it's almost certainly done by passport number. Otherwise it would be impossible to guarantee a unique match. How many Alan Munns are there in the world?
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 17:54
|
show 23 more comments
I have the same situation and have traveled extensively. There where a few reasons why to use two passports on one trip:
- Exiting one country which I have a passport to and entering the other country to which I am a citizen (must use the right passport for each country).
- Was running out of space for stamps on the passport (just lazy to get a new one)
- Going out of one country where I had a visa and into another where I didn't need a visa on my other passport.
Usually I would try to use only one passport during a trip, if you must use two it's usually not a problem, you can just show both at check in (if needed) and at immigration (if asked).
I was pulled aside one time in Hong Kong, mostly since my first name is spelled differently in both passports, after a short explanation I was sent on my way.
It's only problematic if you hold a passport to a country that is refused entry (e.g. going to Malaysia with an Israeli passport) and try to enter with your other passport. I would highly advice against this.
Safe travels!
add a comment |
I have the same situation and have traveled extensively. There where a few reasons why to use two passports on one trip:
- Exiting one country which I have a passport to and entering the other country to which I am a citizen (must use the right passport for each country).
- Was running out of space for stamps on the passport (just lazy to get a new one)
- Going out of one country where I had a visa and into another where I didn't need a visa on my other passport.
Usually I would try to use only one passport during a trip, if you must use two it's usually not a problem, you can just show both at check in (if needed) and at immigration (if asked).
I was pulled aside one time in Hong Kong, mostly since my first name is spelled differently in both passports, after a short explanation I was sent on my way.
It's only problematic if you hold a passport to a country that is refused entry (e.g. going to Malaysia with an Israeli passport) and try to enter with your other passport. I would highly advice against this.
Safe travels!
add a comment |
I have the same situation and have traveled extensively. There where a few reasons why to use two passports on one trip:
- Exiting one country which I have a passport to and entering the other country to which I am a citizen (must use the right passport for each country).
- Was running out of space for stamps on the passport (just lazy to get a new one)
- Going out of one country where I had a visa and into another where I didn't need a visa on my other passport.
Usually I would try to use only one passport during a trip, if you must use two it's usually not a problem, you can just show both at check in (if needed) and at immigration (if asked).
I was pulled aside one time in Hong Kong, mostly since my first name is spelled differently in both passports, after a short explanation I was sent on my way.
It's only problematic if you hold a passport to a country that is refused entry (e.g. going to Malaysia with an Israeli passport) and try to enter with your other passport. I would highly advice against this.
Safe travels!
I have the same situation and have traveled extensively. There where a few reasons why to use two passports on one trip:
- Exiting one country which I have a passport to and entering the other country to which I am a citizen (must use the right passport for each country).
- Was running out of space for stamps on the passport (just lazy to get a new one)
- Going out of one country where I had a visa and into another where I didn't need a visa on my other passport.
Usually I would try to use only one passport during a trip, if you must use two it's usually not a problem, you can just show both at check in (if needed) and at immigration (if asked).
I was pulled aside one time in Hong Kong, mostly since my first name is spelled differently in both passports, after a short explanation I was sent on my way.
It's only problematic if you hold a passport to a country that is refused entry (e.g. going to Malaysia with an Israeli passport) and try to enter with your other passport. I would highly advice against this.
Safe travels!
answered Aug 3 '15 at 11:25
FrequentTravelerFrequentTraveler
1312
1312
add a comment |
add a comment |
Most commonly this is an issue when travelling between the countries of your nationality, which has been well-answered by other people. Otherwise, it may be an issue if you have visa-free travel to a particular third country under one nationality and not the other - in which case, obviously, use the passport that you don't need a visa in.
There is the case where you're travelling to a country that one of your nationalities doesn't get on with, in which case you can travel on your other passport. The obvious examples here are North Korea on a South Korean passport and parts of the Arab world on an Israeli passport. I would strongly suggest not using a second nationality in cases where you're facing that level of hostility; if you're exposed then you could be in real physical danger or danger of arrest.
But there's another case where having multiple nationalities is useful.
On most Western passports, you can travel to Israel; you can also travel to most of the Arab world. But if you try entering certain Arab countries with an Israeli stamp in your passport, then you'll be refused entry.
If you have two passports, you can have stamps for Israel (and Jordan and Egypt if you enter across the land border from Israel) in one passport and those for the (rest of the) Arab world on the other. While some countries will issue you with two passports, it's a lot easier to keep them apart if you have two different nationalities (you're a lot less likely to pick up the wrong one by mistake).
add a comment |
Most commonly this is an issue when travelling between the countries of your nationality, which has been well-answered by other people. Otherwise, it may be an issue if you have visa-free travel to a particular third country under one nationality and not the other - in which case, obviously, use the passport that you don't need a visa in.
There is the case where you're travelling to a country that one of your nationalities doesn't get on with, in which case you can travel on your other passport. The obvious examples here are North Korea on a South Korean passport and parts of the Arab world on an Israeli passport. I would strongly suggest not using a second nationality in cases where you're facing that level of hostility; if you're exposed then you could be in real physical danger or danger of arrest.
But there's another case where having multiple nationalities is useful.
On most Western passports, you can travel to Israel; you can also travel to most of the Arab world. But if you try entering certain Arab countries with an Israeli stamp in your passport, then you'll be refused entry.
If you have two passports, you can have stamps for Israel (and Jordan and Egypt if you enter across the land border from Israel) in one passport and those for the (rest of the) Arab world on the other. While some countries will issue you with two passports, it's a lot easier to keep them apart if you have two different nationalities (you're a lot less likely to pick up the wrong one by mistake).
add a comment |
Most commonly this is an issue when travelling between the countries of your nationality, which has been well-answered by other people. Otherwise, it may be an issue if you have visa-free travel to a particular third country under one nationality and not the other - in which case, obviously, use the passport that you don't need a visa in.
There is the case where you're travelling to a country that one of your nationalities doesn't get on with, in which case you can travel on your other passport. The obvious examples here are North Korea on a South Korean passport and parts of the Arab world on an Israeli passport. I would strongly suggest not using a second nationality in cases where you're facing that level of hostility; if you're exposed then you could be in real physical danger or danger of arrest.
But there's another case where having multiple nationalities is useful.
On most Western passports, you can travel to Israel; you can also travel to most of the Arab world. But if you try entering certain Arab countries with an Israeli stamp in your passport, then you'll be refused entry.
If you have two passports, you can have stamps for Israel (and Jordan and Egypt if you enter across the land border from Israel) in one passport and those for the (rest of the) Arab world on the other. While some countries will issue you with two passports, it's a lot easier to keep them apart if you have two different nationalities (you're a lot less likely to pick up the wrong one by mistake).
Most commonly this is an issue when travelling between the countries of your nationality, which has been well-answered by other people. Otherwise, it may be an issue if you have visa-free travel to a particular third country under one nationality and not the other - in which case, obviously, use the passport that you don't need a visa in.
There is the case where you're travelling to a country that one of your nationalities doesn't get on with, in which case you can travel on your other passport. The obvious examples here are North Korea on a South Korean passport and parts of the Arab world on an Israeli passport. I would strongly suggest not using a second nationality in cases where you're facing that level of hostility; if you're exposed then you could be in real physical danger or danger of arrest.
But there's another case where having multiple nationalities is useful.
On most Western passports, you can travel to Israel; you can also travel to most of the Arab world. But if you try entering certain Arab countries with an Israeli stamp in your passport, then you'll be refused entry.
If you have two passports, you can have stamps for Israel (and Jordan and Egypt if you enter across the land border from Israel) in one passport and those for the (rest of the) Arab world on the other. While some countries will issue you with two passports, it's a lot easier to keep them apart if you have two different nationalities (you're a lot less likely to pick up the wrong one by mistake).
answered Jan 25 '16 at 15:24
Richard GadsdenRichard Gadsden
3,4662032
3,4662032
add a comment |
add a comment |
The anser to your question can depend on the countries involved. For example, a US State Department website says this about dual citizenship Israeli-Americans:
"Israeli citizens naturalized in the United States retain their Israeli citizenship, and children born in the United States to Israeli parents usually acquire both U.S. and Israeli nationality at birth. Israeli citizens, including dual nationals, must enter and depart Israel on their Israeli passports."
Source: travel.state.gov
3
That's actually entirely standard for travel as a dual citizen, and is accounted for in the "Case 1" answer.
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:20
@jpatokal Perhaps it is just me, but I do not see that in Case 1. The first #2 seems to say the opposite.
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 1:01
Case 1 boils down to "show immigration the passport for the country you're in, and show the airline the passport of the country you're going to". I think I'll add that as a summary...
– jpatokal
Aug 16 '15 at 12:40
1
You seem to be using the term "immigration" to refer to the exit/entry officials in the country that you reside. If so, is that standard usage?
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 13:40
1
@jpatokal it's also commonly used by governments. The UK has "immigration officers," and before the founding of the Department of Homeland Security, the US Immigration and Naturalization service employed, if I recall correctly, "immigration inspectors" to process people arriving in the country -- regardless of whether they were citizens, returning immigrants, new immigrants, or non-immigrants. Now their official title is that of "Customs and Border Protection Officer."
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 15:51
|
show 1 more comment
The anser to your question can depend on the countries involved. For example, a US State Department website says this about dual citizenship Israeli-Americans:
"Israeli citizens naturalized in the United States retain their Israeli citizenship, and children born in the United States to Israeli parents usually acquire both U.S. and Israeli nationality at birth. Israeli citizens, including dual nationals, must enter and depart Israel on their Israeli passports."
Source: travel.state.gov
3
That's actually entirely standard for travel as a dual citizen, and is accounted for in the "Case 1" answer.
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:20
@jpatokal Perhaps it is just me, but I do not see that in Case 1. The first #2 seems to say the opposite.
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 1:01
Case 1 boils down to "show immigration the passport for the country you're in, and show the airline the passport of the country you're going to". I think I'll add that as a summary...
– jpatokal
Aug 16 '15 at 12:40
1
You seem to be using the term "immigration" to refer to the exit/entry officials in the country that you reside. If so, is that standard usage?
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 13:40
1
@jpatokal it's also commonly used by governments. The UK has "immigration officers," and before the founding of the Department of Homeland Security, the US Immigration and Naturalization service employed, if I recall correctly, "immigration inspectors" to process people arriving in the country -- regardless of whether they were citizens, returning immigrants, new immigrants, or non-immigrants. Now their official title is that of "Customs and Border Protection Officer."
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 15:51
|
show 1 more comment
The anser to your question can depend on the countries involved. For example, a US State Department website says this about dual citizenship Israeli-Americans:
"Israeli citizens naturalized in the United States retain their Israeli citizenship, and children born in the United States to Israeli parents usually acquire both U.S. and Israeli nationality at birth. Israeli citizens, including dual nationals, must enter and depart Israel on their Israeli passports."
Source: travel.state.gov
The anser to your question can depend on the countries involved. For example, a US State Department website says this about dual citizenship Israeli-Americans:
"Israeli citizens naturalized in the United States retain their Israeli citizenship, and children born in the United States to Israeli parents usually acquire both U.S. and Israeli nationality at birth. Israeli citizens, including dual nationals, must enter and depart Israel on their Israeli passports."
Source: travel.state.gov
edited Sep 6 '17 at 16:45
Ram Chandra Giri
430213
430213
answered Aug 14 '15 at 22:18
Yehuda_NYCYehuda_NYC
8081722
8081722
3
That's actually entirely standard for travel as a dual citizen, and is accounted for in the "Case 1" answer.
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:20
@jpatokal Perhaps it is just me, but I do not see that in Case 1. The first #2 seems to say the opposite.
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 1:01
Case 1 boils down to "show immigration the passport for the country you're in, and show the airline the passport of the country you're going to". I think I'll add that as a summary...
– jpatokal
Aug 16 '15 at 12:40
1
You seem to be using the term "immigration" to refer to the exit/entry officials in the country that you reside. If so, is that standard usage?
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 13:40
1
@jpatokal it's also commonly used by governments. The UK has "immigration officers," and before the founding of the Department of Homeland Security, the US Immigration and Naturalization service employed, if I recall correctly, "immigration inspectors" to process people arriving in the country -- regardless of whether they were citizens, returning immigrants, new immigrants, or non-immigrants. Now their official title is that of "Customs and Border Protection Officer."
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 15:51
|
show 1 more comment
3
That's actually entirely standard for travel as a dual citizen, and is accounted for in the "Case 1" answer.
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:20
@jpatokal Perhaps it is just me, but I do not see that in Case 1. The first #2 seems to say the opposite.
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 1:01
Case 1 boils down to "show immigration the passport for the country you're in, and show the airline the passport of the country you're going to". I think I'll add that as a summary...
– jpatokal
Aug 16 '15 at 12:40
1
You seem to be using the term "immigration" to refer to the exit/entry officials in the country that you reside. If so, is that standard usage?
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 13:40
1
@jpatokal it's also commonly used by governments. The UK has "immigration officers," and before the founding of the Department of Homeland Security, the US Immigration and Naturalization service employed, if I recall correctly, "immigration inspectors" to process people arriving in the country -- regardless of whether they were citizens, returning immigrants, new immigrants, or non-immigrants. Now their official title is that of "Customs and Border Protection Officer."
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 15:51
3
3
That's actually entirely standard for travel as a dual citizen, and is accounted for in the "Case 1" answer.
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:20
That's actually entirely standard for travel as a dual citizen, and is accounted for in the "Case 1" answer.
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:20
@jpatokal Perhaps it is just me, but I do not see that in Case 1. The first #2 seems to say the opposite.
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 1:01
@jpatokal Perhaps it is just me, but I do not see that in Case 1. The first #2 seems to say the opposite.
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 1:01
Case 1 boils down to "show immigration the passport for the country you're in, and show the airline the passport of the country you're going to". I think I'll add that as a summary...
– jpatokal
Aug 16 '15 at 12:40
Case 1 boils down to "show immigration the passport for the country you're in, and show the airline the passport of the country you're going to". I think I'll add that as a summary...
– jpatokal
Aug 16 '15 at 12:40
1
1
You seem to be using the term "immigration" to refer to the exit/entry officials in the country that you reside. If so, is that standard usage?
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 13:40
You seem to be using the term "immigration" to refer to the exit/entry officials in the country that you reside. If so, is that standard usage?
– Yehuda_NYC
Aug 16 '15 at 13:40
1
1
@jpatokal it's also commonly used by governments. The UK has "immigration officers," and before the founding of the Department of Homeland Security, the US Immigration and Naturalization service employed, if I recall correctly, "immigration inspectors" to process people arriving in the country -- regardless of whether they were citizens, returning immigrants, new immigrants, or non-immigrants. Now their official title is that of "Customs and Border Protection Officer."
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 15:51
@jpatokal it's also commonly used by governments. The UK has "immigration officers," and before the founding of the Department of Homeland Security, the US Immigration and Naturalization service employed, if I recall correctly, "immigration inspectors" to process people arriving in the country -- regardless of whether they were citizens, returning immigrants, new immigrants, or non-immigrants. Now their official title is that of "Customs and Border Protection Officer."
– phoog
Jan 25 '16 at 15:51
|
show 1 more comment
A wrinkle I just encountered is that some electronic passport readers appear to be linked to departure records. I was travelling from New Zealand to the UK, and have ePassports for both (case 1 of the accepted answer). I showed my UK passport to the airline agent checking me in, and then attempted to use my NZ passport in the passport reader at the immigration control point. It did not work, and I had to use my UK passport instead.
Had you entered NZ using the NZ passport? If so, did anyone ask about the lack of an entry record for your UK passport?
– phoog
Oct 3 '17 at 20:21
I last entered NZ using the NZ passport, as I'd used it to travel to Australia. The immigration agent only asked me if I had another passport, and when that let me through the gate, he was satisfied. I find that odd, as there are emigration restrictions in NZ - you can't leave if you have unpaid parking tickets, for example.
– Rupert Morrish
Oct 3 '17 at 20:36
add a comment |
A wrinkle I just encountered is that some electronic passport readers appear to be linked to departure records. I was travelling from New Zealand to the UK, and have ePassports for both (case 1 of the accepted answer). I showed my UK passport to the airline agent checking me in, and then attempted to use my NZ passport in the passport reader at the immigration control point. It did not work, and I had to use my UK passport instead.
Had you entered NZ using the NZ passport? If so, did anyone ask about the lack of an entry record for your UK passport?
– phoog
Oct 3 '17 at 20:21
I last entered NZ using the NZ passport, as I'd used it to travel to Australia. The immigration agent only asked me if I had another passport, and when that let me through the gate, he was satisfied. I find that odd, as there are emigration restrictions in NZ - you can't leave if you have unpaid parking tickets, for example.
– Rupert Morrish
Oct 3 '17 at 20:36
add a comment |
A wrinkle I just encountered is that some electronic passport readers appear to be linked to departure records. I was travelling from New Zealand to the UK, and have ePassports for both (case 1 of the accepted answer). I showed my UK passport to the airline agent checking me in, and then attempted to use my NZ passport in the passport reader at the immigration control point. It did not work, and I had to use my UK passport instead.
A wrinkle I just encountered is that some electronic passport readers appear to be linked to departure records. I was travelling from New Zealand to the UK, and have ePassports for both (case 1 of the accepted answer). I showed my UK passport to the airline agent checking me in, and then attempted to use my NZ passport in the passport reader at the immigration control point. It did not work, and I had to use my UK passport instead.
answered Oct 3 '17 at 20:19
Rupert MorrishRupert Morrish
308210
308210
Had you entered NZ using the NZ passport? If so, did anyone ask about the lack of an entry record for your UK passport?
– phoog
Oct 3 '17 at 20:21
I last entered NZ using the NZ passport, as I'd used it to travel to Australia. The immigration agent only asked me if I had another passport, and when that let me through the gate, he was satisfied. I find that odd, as there are emigration restrictions in NZ - you can't leave if you have unpaid parking tickets, for example.
– Rupert Morrish
Oct 3 '17 at 20:36
add a comment |
Had you entered NZ using the NZ passport? If so, did anyone ask about the lack of an entry record for your UK passport?
– phoog
Oct 3 '17 at 20:21
I last entered NZ using the NZ passport, as I'd used it to travel to Australia. The immigration agent only asked me if I had another passport, and when that let me through the gate, he was satisfied. I find that odd, as there are emigration restrictions in NZ - you can't leave if you have unpaid parking tickets, for example.
– Rupert Morrish
Oct 3 '17 at 20:36
Had you entered NZ using the NZ passport? If so, did anyone ask about the lack of an entry record for your UK passport?
– phoog
Oct 3 '17 at 20:21
Had you entered NZ using the NZ passport? If so, did anyone ask about the lack of an entry record for your UK passport?
– phoog
Oct 3 '17 at 20:21
I last entered NZ using the NZ passport, as I'd used it to travel to Australia. The immigration agent only asked me if I had another passport, and when that let me through the gate, he was satisfied. I find that odd, as there are emigration restrictions in NZ - you can't leave if you have unpaid parking tickets, for example.
– Rupert Morrish
Oct 3 '17 at 20:36
I last entered NZ using the NZ passport, as I'd used it to travel to Australia. The immigration agent only asked me if I had another passport, and when that let me through the gate, he was satisfied. I find that odd, as there are emigration restrictions in NZ - you can't leave if you have unpaid parking tickets, for example.
– Rupert Morrish
Oct 3 '17 at 20:36
add a comment |
protected by Michael Hampton Nov 14 '16 at 23:29
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
8
See also travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3515/…
– Relaxed
Aug 14 '15 at 22:54
3
@Relaxed This is intended as the canonical Q&A for this FAQ, see: meta.travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3283/…
– jpatokal
Aug 15 '15 at 5:19
This question was properly put forward in META and agreed upon either by comment or answer or general apathy. We should be using this question as the controlling reference for future questions matching this one. @jpatokal
– Gayot Fow
Aug 16 '15 at 12:54
are those 2 passports somehow bringing the same group of facts? e.g. are those 2 from commonwealth countries(Canada / Australia) are those from the EU (Austria / Spain) ?????
– ΦXocę 웃 Пepeúpa ツ
Sep 7 '17 at 12:29