Difference between super(variableName) ; and super.variableName

Difference between super(variableName) ; and super.variableName



enter image description here What is the Difference between super(variable-name); and super.variableName = something; in a constructor, when you want to initialize the parameters and you wanna assign one of them to a variable of a parent class?


super(variable-name);


super.variableName = something;



for example i want to implement the constructor of the "Zahnradfraese" and it takes the parameter "int Kennung" and this parameter should be assigned to the attribute "kennung" of the parent class "Produktionmittel"



Should I always use super when I wanna call a variable from this parent class or I just use it if I have another variable with the same name in the child class?






as you cannot modify the kennung class, you can use super.setKennung(kennung) inside the constructor of Zahnradfraese class.

– Yug Singh
Sep 16 '18 at 16:54



super.setKennung(kennung)


Zahnradfraese




5 Answers
5



super(variable_name) represents a constructor call and should be first line in the constructor. Whereas super.variableName = something; means you are assigning a value to the instance variable of the parent class from the child class using super which is used to refer parent class objects.


super(variable_name)


super.variableName = something;


super



Now in your case: as per given class-diagram
the class Zahnradfraese has a constructor which takes int Kennung argument. Also, kennung is the parent-class and has no constructor and instead it has method setKennung(). So you can do super.setKennung(kennung) from inside the constructor of Zahnradfraese class. You can also declare a constructor inside kennung but that would mean deviating from the class-diagram which has setter and getter methods and no constructor.


Zahnradfraese


int Kennung


kennung


setKennung()


super.setKennung(kennung)


Zahnradfraese


kennung


public class Zahnradfraese extends Kennung
public Zahnradfraese(int kennung)
super.setKennung(kennung);







Great! thanks, one more question please, in this case if i use setKennung, super will make no diffrence? i mean because Zahnradfraese is extending the Produktionmittel so it has access to its methods, right? and if i did like super.kennung = sth will do the same job?

– Sengo
Sep 16 '18 at 17:05






@Sengo you are right. In your case the child class has access to parent class method so you can do that.

– Yug Singh
Sep 16 '18 at 17:11



What is the difference between super(variableName); and super.variableName = something;?


super(variableName);


super.variableName = something;



method() (here, super(variableName)) is a method invocation (here, a parent's constructor invocation).


method()


super(variableName)



super.variableName = something; is an assignment to a parent's field.


super.variableName = something;



Should I always use super when I wanna call a variable from this parent class or I just use it if I have another variable with the same name in the child class?


super



super(variableName) can initialise the inner state of the parent, particularly super.variableName. It is reasonable to initialise a super.variableName before accessing it. Both ways you listed can be utilised for that. Just make sure there is no code duplication.


super(variableName)


super.variableName


super.variableName



I want to implement the constructor of the Zahnradfraese and it takes the parameter int Kennung and this parameter should be assigned to the attribute kennung of the parent class Produktionmittel.


Zahnradfraese


int Kennung


kennung


Produktionmittel



Add a constructor to Produktionmittel which takes an int


Produktionmittel


int


public Produktionmittel(int i)
kennung = i;



and call it from the child:


public Zahnradfraese(int kennung)
super(kennung);






thank you for your answer, i didn't understand what do you mean by super(variableName) can initialise the inner state of the parent. could you please explain it more? and i dont have the option to add a constructor to the Produktionmittel

– Sengo
Sep 16 '18 at 16:46







@Sengo the inner state of an object is the state of all the fields it possesses.

– Andrew Tobilko
Sep 16 '18 at 17:08






@Sengo a single constructor argument can affect more than 1 field (for example, it can set one field and participate in calculations for another one)

– Andrew Tobilko
Sep 16 '18 at 17:11






@Sengo, if you can't add a constructor to the parent, then super.variable = value; is the only option.

– Andrew Tobilko
Sep 16 '18 at 17:12


super.variable = value;



So super(variableName) is invoking your parent class one arg constructor, and that logic gets executes


super(variableName)



super.variableName = something; is assigning something value to parent class variable variableName


super.variableName = something;


something


variableName



super() is a keyword which is used to call the constructor in the parent class and it must be called from inside the constructor of the child class. Also it must be the first statement.


super()



Where as super.s is used to set the variable s (which is declared in the parent class) from the child class and it doesn't have restrictions as above.


super.s


s



See below example:


class Test
int s;

Test(int d)



class T extends Test
T()
super(8);
int d = 99;
super.s = 00;


void ss()
super.s = 99;







thank you for your help, so super(8) will compile the constructor of Test class?

– Sengo
Sep 16 '18 at 16:49






@Sengo, it will execute (not compile) the Test constructor

– Andrew Tobilko
Sep 16 '18 at 17:14


Test



super(arg) invokes the constructor of the super class, setting the variable just sets the variable. (The constructor might contain more logic than just assigning a variable, which you bypass with the second way)



Simple example:


public class P
protected String variable1;
private boolean variableInitialized = false;

public P (String s)
this.variable1 = s;
this.variableInitialized=true;



public class C extends P




calling super("x") within C will also set the boolean flag, as the parent class "might expect" it. Calling super.variable1="x" will not affect the boolean flag, and you can't change it, cause it's private.


super("x")


C


super.variable1="x"



As a rule of the thumb i'd say: If there is a dedicated constructor for a certain variable, it seems worth using it, unless you exactly want to override that implementation.



Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!



But avoid



To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.



Required, but never shown



Required, but never shown




By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Crossroads (UK TV series)

ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế