USA, travelling with more than USD 10,000
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I will be leaving for USA in a little while, and I plan to carry around USD 12,500. I will be visiting my son there, and I will hand over that cash to him then.
As I understand, if the amount is more than USD 10,000 you must declare it, using this form.
However, it states
Each person who receives currency or other monetary instruments in the
United States shall file FinCEN Form 105, within 15 days after receipt
of the currency or monetary instruments, with the Customs officer in
charge at any port of entry or departure or by mail with the
Commissioner of Customs, Attention: Currency Transportation Reports,
Washington DC 20229.
After I have handed the money over to my son, will my son need to declare it? Also, what other documentation would I be needing if the cash exceeds USD 10,000?
I have already searched through this link, and haven't found what I am looking for.
usa customs-and-immigration money
|
show 7 more comments
I will be leaving for USA in a little while, and I plan to carry around USD 12,500. I will be visiting my son there, and I will hand over that cash to him then.
As I understand, if the amount is more than USD 10,000 you must declare it, using this form.
However, it states
Each person who receives currency or other monetary instruments in the
United States shall file FinCEN Form 105, within 15 days after receipt
of the currency or monetary instruments, with the Customs officer in
charge at any port of entry or departure or by mail with the
Commissioner of Customs, Attention: Currency Transportation Reports,
Washington DC 20229.
After I have handed the money over to my son, will my son need to declare it? Also, what other documentation would I be needing if the cash exceeds USD 10,000?
I have already searched through this link, and haven't found what I am looking for.
usa customs-and-immigration money
2
If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.
– Zach Lipton
Apr 8 '16 at 23:42
3
I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?
– Patricia Shanahan
Apr 9 '16 at 0:52
1
@PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)
– debuggerpk
Apr 9 '16 at 9:58
1
Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!
– pbu
Apr 9 '16 at 12:58
1
@pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.
– Relaxed
Aug 24 '16 at 22:37
|
show 7 more comments
I will be leaving for USA in a little while, and I plan to carry around USD 12,500. I will be visiting my son there, and I will hand over that cash to him then.
As I understand, if the amount is more than USD 10,000 you must declare it, using this form.
However, it states
Each person who receives currency or other monetary instruments in the
United States shall file FinCEN Form 105, within 15 days after receipt
of the currency or monetary instruments, with the Customs officer in
charge at any port of entry or departure or by mail with the
Commissioner of Customs, Attention: Currency Transportation Reports,
Washington DC 20229.
After I have handed the money over to my son, will my son need to declare it? Also, what other documentation would I be needing if the cash exceeds USD 10,000?
I have already searched through this link, and haven't found what I am looking for.
usa customs-and-immigration money
I will be leaving for USA in a little while, and I plan to carry around USD 12,500. I will be visiting my son there, and I will hand over that cash to him then.
As I understand, if the amount is more than USD 10,000 you must declare it, using this form.
However, it states
Each person who receives currency or other monetary instruments in the
United States shall file FinCEN Form 105, within 15 days after receipt
of the currency or monetary instruments, with the Customs officer in
charge at any port of entry or departure or by mail with the
Commissioner of Customs, Attention: Currency Transportation Reports,
Washington DC 20229.
After I have handed the money over to my son, will my son need to declare it? Also, what other documentation would I be needing if the cash exceeds USD 10,000?
I have already searched through this link, and haven't found what I am looking for.
usa customs-and-immigration money
usa customs-and-immigration money
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:52
Community♦
1
1
asked Apr 8 '16 at 22:03
debuggerpkdebuggerpk
14315
14315
2
If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.
– Zach Lipton
Apr 8 '16 at 23:42
3
I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?
– Patricia Shanahan
Apr 9 '16 at 0:52
1
@PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)
– debuggerpk
Apr 9 '16 at 9:58
1
Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!
– pbu
Apr 9 '16 at 12:58
1
@pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.
– Relaxed
Aug 24 '16 at 22:37
|
show 7 more comments
2
If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.
– Zach Lipton
Apr 8 '16 at 23:42
3
I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?
– Patricia Shanahan
Apr 9 '16 at 0:52
1
@PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)
– debuggerpk
Apr 9 '16 at 9:58
1
Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!
– pbu
Apr 9 '16 at 12:58
1
@pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.
– Relaxed
Aug 24 '16 at 22:37
2
2
If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.
– Zach Lipton
Apr 8 '16 at 23:42
If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.
– Zach Lipton
Apr 8 '16 at 23:42
3
3
I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?
– Patricia Shanahan
Apr 9 '16 at 0:52
I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?
– Patricia Shanahan
Apr 9 '16 at 0:52
1
1
@PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)
– debuggerpk
Apr 9 '16 at 9:58
@PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)
– debuggerpk
Apr 9 '16 at 9:58
1
1
Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!
– pbu
Apr 9 '16 at 12:58
Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!
– pbu
Apr 9 '16 at 12:58
1
1
@pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.
– Relaxed
Aug 24 '16 at 22:37
@pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.
– Relaxed
Aug 24 '16 at 22:37
|
show 7 more comments
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
The form instructions state that the declaration only needs to be made once. You don't need to do it twice.
An additional report of a particular transportation, mailing, or shipping of currency or the monetary instruments is not required if a complete and truthful report has already been filed.
Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported. You are importing the currency, so you will file the declaration.
1
"Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.
– phoog
Apr 8 '16 at 23:46
4
@phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 0:00
I don't think this is correct. See my answer
– Hilmar
Apr 9 '16 at 18:38
@Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 18:42
@MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx
– Burhan Khalid
Apr 10 '16 at 6:53
|
show 8 more comments
Travelling in the United States with such a huge amount of cash is extremely dangerous because civil forfeiture. Your money can be taken at the airport, by the security at the airport a routine traffic stop and practically anywhere else. Once the cops seize the cash they will not charge you (often they won't have anything to charge you with) but the money itself and you will have a lot of difficulties getting it back.
3
Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 9 '16 at 2:38
5
I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.
– chx
Apr 9 '16 at 2:42
2
I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 4:28
5
Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 '16 at 6:09
6
Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.
– Stephan Branczyk
Apr 9 '16 at 19:32
|
show 2 more comments
If you send the money by a bank wire to your son, then the banks will file the proper notification paperwork at both ends.
If you carry it into the country in cash, then you need to declare that fact and fill out FinCEN Form 105 for your trip, as you have noted. But you are not "importing" it rather you are "carrying" it in. - https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/more%20than%20$10000%20cash/
The "receiving person" details mentioned in your post would apply if you sent the money by courier or other means where the responsible party is not physically moving the money. It also applies to bank wires, but the banks usually handle the declaration paperwork for their customers automatically.
There maybe restrictions or declarations in your country of origin to consider as well.
If your son deposits it into his US bank account, then the bank will have to declare that deposit as it is over $10K. But that again is paperwork the bank will handle automatically, with perhaps a few questions for your son.
Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable
– Andrew Lazarus
Apr 9 '16 at 5:41
1
Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 6:00
add a comment |
I would be very careful in the United States with cash, due to Asset Forfeiture.
It's hard to say how high the risk or frequency, but there seem to be many incidents of this occurring. Of the cases I have followed where there is no justifiable cause, most have been unable to get any of their money back even after long legal processes. In some cases the asset owner has been able to negotiate return of a small percentage.
The frequency seems to be higher with local law enforcement, but also exists with state and federal. These cases are kept quiet and charges are rarely levied.
add a comment |
If this is useful, I've entered the USA twice with way more than $10,000 in traveler checks (but not in cash). The procedure is the following: you mark it on the Custom declaration, go to Customs, they check your declaration and send you to the secondary desk. There you are given a simple form, fill it up and give it to them. After that you're done. They didn't ask to see the traveler checks or count them, and generally looked completely uninterested and unexcited about the whole process.
No unusual questions were asked by the Customs, but my bank (where I deposited it), asked whether I declared it to the Customs. I said "yes" and they didn't have any further questions.
add a comment |
WHO MUST FILE: (1) Each person who physically transports, mails, or
ships, or causes to be physically transported, mailed, or shipped
currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount
exceeding $10,000 at one time from the United States to any place
outside the United States or into the United States from any place
outside the United States, and
(2) Each person who receives in the
United States currency or other monetary instruments In an aggregate
amount exceeding $10,000 at one time which have been transported,
mailed, or shipped to the person from any place outside the United
States.
It looks like you both must file since the last word in the first paragraph is "and". While it is perfectly legal and can attract a lot of undesirable attention from the authorities such as the IRS or the department of homeland security. We did this once as a young white couple with three small children in tow and still got subjected to intense questioning.
First: I would NOT use cash because of risk of loss and high currency exchange fee. If you need a cash-like instrument, use travelers checks. These can be replaced if stolen and typically just have a 1% flat fee. They still are subject to declaration.
Electronic transfers are safer, cheaper, and easier on the paperwork. I use http://www.xe.com/xetrade/ to send money to kids abroad. Many banks these days have direct partnerships with other banks in different countries for mutual use of ATMs and low overhead transfer. For example Bank of America works with Deutsche Bank in Germany, Santander in Mexico, China Construction Bank, Westpac in Australia/NZ etc. I recommend talking to your local bank or finding a Bank in your country with ties to the US.
1
I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?
– tubedogg
Apr 13 '16 at 3:53
add a comment |
I am writing this because of "J Bergen"s poor answer. Bergen gives some bad advice.
- You can bring as much currency into the country as you want, as long as you declare it. Otherwise, there will be penalties
- NEVER STRUCTURE YOUR MONEY: i.e. bring in amounts under $10,000 multiple times. That's as bad as not declaring, and could see your visa revoked.
- Western Union is not good
- If you are unsure if the total amount of money (in any currency) you have anywhere (in your bags, pockets, shoe, etc) is equivalent to US$10,000 or more, DECLARE
add a comment |
The USA is a country with an effective, reliable banking system that does a good job serving consumers with virtually no graft or theft. As such, the only people who handle large quantities of cash are:
- fools
- criminals
This may differ dramatically from your country. The US government is primarily concerned with the second, and cares less about the property rights of the first. "A fool and his money..."
So it may be standard practice in your country to deal in cash, but in America it will get a frosty reception because of these prejudices. With an underlying assumption that more likely than not, it is in America's best interests to separate you from your money. There will be a mechanism by which you can appeal for its return, but this could cost a big chunk of $12,500 in lawyer costs.
The way America expects you to do this is via the trusted, western banking system. For instance have your friend generate an invoice on PayPal for the goods or services, and pay them via PayPal. If for some reason you can't do conventional electronic transfers, you need to fix why that is.
Bringing in cash because electronic transfers don't work is just the kind of thing they're on guard for. Customs will know the reasons your wire transfers were disallowed, and will be wary of cash moving on the same route. Effectively you're circumventing the normal way of doing this.
That isn't structuring, but they have a lot in common.
The upshot is that bringing large blocks of cash is a fool's game, and you should expect problems.
add a comment |
Don't do it! Also check how much the Country you are going to allows you to come in with! It is a scam in many places. America allows you $10,000 do not be a penney over that amount even in change or they will steal it from you! Or tie you up so you miss your flight. Some Countries do to exchange rate allow a little less than that. So on arrival they will steal it from you! As you are over there amount to bring in. 3rd world Countries are good for this scam! Set up a Western Union acount & wire yourself the money to were ever. If they have Western Union there. Then bring in $6,000 at a time on 2 transfers.
2
You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good
– Matthew Barclay
Feb 27 '18 at 22:12
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66328%2fusa-travelling-with-more-than-usd-10-000%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The form instructions state that the declaration only needs to be made once. You don't need to do it twice.
An additional report of a particular transportation, mailing, or shipping of currency or the monetary instruments is not required if a complete and truthful report has already been filed.
Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported. You are importing the currency, so you will file the declaration.
1
"Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.
– phoog
Apr 8 '16 at 23:46
4
@phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 0:00
I don't think this is correct. See my answer
– Hilmar
Apr 9 '16 at 18:38
@Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 18:42
@MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx
– Burhan Khalid
Apr 10 '16 at 6:53
|
show 8 more comments
The form instructions state that the declaration only needs to be made once. You don't need to do it twice.
An additional report of a particular transportation, mailing, or shipping of currency or the monetary instruments is not required if a complete and truthful report has already been filed.
Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported. You are importing the currency, so you will file the declaration.
1
"Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.
– phoog
Apr 8 '16 at 23:46
4
@phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 0:00
I don't think this is correct. See my answer
– Hilmar
Apr 9 '16 at 18:38
@Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 18:42
@MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx
– Burhan Khalid
Apr 10 '16 at 6:53
|
show 8 more comments
The form instructions state that the declaration only needs to be made once. You don't need to do it twice.
An additional report of a particular transportation, mailing, or shipping of currency or the monetary instruments is not required if a complete and truthful report has already been filed.
Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported. You are importing the currency, so you will file the declaration.
The form instructions state that the declaration only needs to be made once. You don't need to do it twice.
An additional report of a particular transportation, mailing, or shipping of currency or the monetary instruments is not required if a complete and truthful report has already been filed.
Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported. You are importing the currency, so you will file the declaration.
answered Apr 8 '16 at 22:27
Michael HamptonMichael Hampton
38.3k385170
38.3k385170
1
"Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.
– phoog
Apr 8 '16 at 23:46
4
@phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 0:00
I don't think this is correct. See my answer
– Hilmar
Apr 9 '16 at 18:38
@Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 18:42
@MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx
– Burhan Khalid
Apr 10 '16 at 6:53
|
show 8 more comments
1
"Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.
– phoog
Apr 8 '16 at 23:46
4
@phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 0:00
I don't think this is correct. See my answer
– Hilmar
Apr 9 '16 at 18:38
@Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 18:42
@MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx
– Burhan Khalid
Apr 10 '16 at 6:53
1
1
"Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.
– phoog
Apr 8 '16 at 23:46
"Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.
– phoog
Apr 8 '16 at 23:46
4
4
@phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 0:00
@phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 0:00
I don't think this is correct. See my answer
– Hilmar
Apr 9 '16 at 18:38
I don't think this is correct. See my answer
– Hilmar
Apr 9 '16 at 18:38
@Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 18:42
@Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!
– Michael Hampton
Apr 9 '16 at 18:42
@MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx
– Burhan Khalid
Apr 10 '16 at 6:53
@MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx
– Burhan Khalid
Apr 10 '16 at 6:53
|
show 8 more comments
Travelling in the United States with such a huge amount of cash is extremely dangerous because civil forfeiture. Your money can be taken at the airport, by the security at the airport a routine traffic stop and practically anywhere else. Once the cops seize the cash they will not charge you (often they won't have anything to charge you with) but the money itself and you will have a lot of difficulties getting it back.
3
Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 9 '16 at 2:38
5
I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.
– chx
Apr 9 '16 at 2:42
2
I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 4:28
5
Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 '16 at 6:09
6
Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.
– Stephan Branczyk
Apr 9 '16 at 19:32
|
show 2 more comments
Travelling in the United States with such a huge amount of cash is extremely dangerous because civil forfeiture. Your money can be taken at the airport, by the security at the airport a routine traffic stop and practically anywhere else. Once the cops seize the cash they will not charge you (often they won't have anything to charge you with) but the money itself and you will have a lot of difficulties getting it back.
3
Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 9 '16 at 2:38
5
I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.
– chx
Apr 9 '16 at 2:42
2
I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 4:28
5
Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 '16 at 6:09
6
Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.
– Stephan Branczyk
Apr 9 '16 at 19:32
|
show 2 more comments
Travelling in the United States with such a huge amount of cash is extremely dangerous because civil forfeiture. Your money can be taken at the airport, by the security at the airport a routine traffic stop and practically anywhere else. Once the cops seize the cash they will not charge you (often they won't have anything to charge you with) but the money itself and you will have a lot of difficulties getting it back.
Travelling in the United States with such a huge amount of cash is extremely dangerous because civil forfeiture. Your money can be taken at the airport, by the security at the airport a routine traffic stop and practically anywhere else. Once the cops seize the cash they will not charge you (often they won't have anything to charge you with) but the money itself and you will have a lot of difficulties getting it back.
answered Apr 9 '16 at 0:44
chxchx
38.9k485192
38.9k485192
3
Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 9 '16 at 2:38
5
I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.
– chx
Apr 9 '16 at 2:42
2
I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 4:28
5
Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 '16 at 6:09
6
Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.
– Stephan Branczyk
Apr 9 '16 at 19:32
|
show 2 more comments
3
Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 9 '16 at 2:38
5
I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.
– chx
Apr 9 '16 at 2:42
2
I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 4:28
5
Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 '16 at 6:09
6
Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.
– Stephan Branczyk
Apr 9 '16 at 19:32
3
3
Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 9 '16 at 2:38
Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 9 '16 at 2:38
5
5
I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.
– chx
Apr 9 '16 at 2:42
I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.
– chx
Apr 9 '16 at 2:42
2
2
I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 4:28
I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 4:28
5
5
Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 '16 at 6:09
Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 '16 at 6:09
6
6
Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.
– Stephan Branczyk
Apr 9 '16 at 19:32
Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.
– Stephan Branczyk
Apr 9 '16 at 19:32
|
show 2 more comments
If you send the money by a bank wire to your son, then the banks will file the proper notification paperwork at both ends.
If you carry it into the country in cash, then you need to declare that fact and fill out FinCEN Form 105 for your trip, as you have noted. But you are not "importing" it rather you are "carrying" it in. - https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/more%20than%20$10000%20cash/
The "receiving person" details mentioned in your post would apply if you sent the money by courier or other means where the responsible party is not physically moving the money. It also applies to bank wires, but the banks usually handle the declaration paperwork for their customers automatically.
There maybe restrictions or declarations in your country of origin to consider as well.
If your son deposits it into his US bank account, then the bank will have to declare that deposit as it is over $10K. But that again is paperwork the bank will handle automatically, with perhaps a few questions for your son.
Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable
– Andrew Lazarus
Apr 9 '16 at 5:41
1
Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 6:00
add a comment |
If you send the money by a bank wire to your son, then the banks will file the proper notification paperwork at both ends.
If you carry it into the country in cash, then you need to declare that fact and fill out FinCEN Form 105 for your trip, as you have noted. But you are not "importing" it rather you are "carrying" it in. - https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/more%20than%20$10000%20cash/
The "receiving person" details mentioned in your post would apply if you sent the money by courier or other means where the responsible party is not physically moving the money. It also applies to bank wires, but the banks usually handle the declaration paperwork for their customers automatically.
There maybe restrictions or declarations in your country of origin to consider as well.
If your son deposits it into his US bank account, then the bank will have to declare that deposit as it is over $10K. But that again is paperwork the bank will handle automatically, with perhaps a few questions for your son.
Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable
– Andrew Lazarus
Apr 9 '16 at 5:41
1
Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 6:00
add a comment |
If you send the money by a bank wire to your son, then the banks will file the proper notification paperwork at both ends.
If you carry it into the country in cash, then you need to declare that fact and fill out FinCEN Form 105 for your trip, as you have noted. But you are not "importing" it rather you are "carrying" it in. - https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/more%20than%20$10000%20cash/
The "receiving person" details mentioned in your post would apply if you sent the money by courier or other means where the responsible party is not physically moving the money. It also applies to bank wires, but the banks usually handle the declaration paperwork for their customers automatically.
There maybe restrictions or declarations in your country of origin to consider as well.
If your son deposits it into his US bank account, then the bank will have to declare that deposit as it is over $10K. But that again is paperwork the bank will handle automatically, with perhaps a few questions for your son.
If you send the money by a bank wire to your son, then the banks will file the proper notification paperwork at both ends.
If you carry it into the country in cash, then you need to declare that fact and fill out FinCEN Form 105 for your trip, as you have noted. But you are not "importing" it rather you are "carrying" it in. - https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/more%20than%20$10000%20cash/
The "receiving person" details mentioned in your post would apply if you sent the money by courier or other means where the responsible party is not physically moving the money. It also applies to bank wires, but the banks usually handle the declaration paperwork for their customers automatically.
There maybe restrictions or declarations in your country of origin to consider as well.
If your son deposits it into his US bank account, then the bank will have to declare that deposit as it is over $10K. But that again is paperwork the bank will handle automatically, with perhaps a few questions for your son.
edited Apr 9 '16 at 5:56
answered Apr 9 '16 at 1:35
user13044
Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable
– Andrew Lazarus
Apr 9 '16 at 5:41
1
Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 6:00
add a comment |
Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable
– Andrew Lazarus
Apr 9 '16 at 5:41
1
Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 6:00
Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable
– Andrew Lazarus
Apr 9 '16 at 5:41
Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable
– Andrew Lazarus
Apr 9 '16 at 5:41
1
1
Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 6:00
Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).
– user13044
Apr 9 '16 at 6:00
add a comment |
I would be very careful in the United States with cash, due to Asset Forfeiture.
It's hard to say how high the risk or frequency, but there seem to be many incidents of this occurring. Of the cases I have followed where there is no justifiable cause, most have been unable to get any of their money back even after long legal processes. In some cases the asset owner has been able to negotiate return of a small percentage.
The frequency seems to be higher with local law enforcement, but also exists with state and federal. These cases are kept quiet and charges are rarely levied.
add a comment |
I would be very careful in the United States with cash, due to Asset Forfeiture.
It's hard to say how high the risk or frequency, but there seem to be many incidents of this occurring. Of the cases I have followed where there is no justifiable cause, most have been unable to get any of their money back even after long legal processes. In some cases the asset owner has been able to negotiate return of a small percentage.
The frequency seems to be higher with local law enforcement, but also exists with state and federal. These cases are kept quiet and charges are rarely levied.
add a comment |
I would be very careful in the United States with cash, due to Asset Forfeiture.
It's hard to say how high the risk or frequency, but there seem to be many incidents of this occurring. Of the cases I have followed where there is no justifiable cause, most have been unable to get any of their money back even after long legal processes. In some cases the asset owner has been able to negotiate return of a small percentage.
The frequency seems to be higher with local law enforcement, but also exists with state and federal. These cases are kept quiet and charges are rarely levied.
I would be very careful in the United States with cash, due to Asset Forfeiture.
It's hard to say how high the risk or frequency, but there seem to be many incidents of this occurring. Of the cases I have followed where there is no justifiable cause, most have been unable to get any of their money back even after long legal processes. In some cases the asset owner has been able to negotiate return of a small percentage.
The frequency seems to be higher with local law enforcement, but also exists with state and federal. These cases are kept quiet and charges are rarely levied.
answered Aug 24 '16 at 22:29
JohnJohn
311
311
add a comment |
add a comment |
If this is useful, I've entered the USA twice with way more than $10,000 in traveler checks (but not in cash). The procedure is the following: you mark it on the Custom declaration, go to Customs, they check your declaration and send you to the secondary desk. There you are given a simple form, fill it up and give it to them. After that you're done. They didn't ask to see the traveler checks or count them, and generally looked completely uninterested and unexcited about the whole process.
No unusual questions were asked by the Customs, but my bank (where I deposited it), asked whether I declared it to the Customs. I said "yes" and they didn't have any further questions.
add a comment |
If this is useful, I've entered the USA twice with way more than $10,000 in traveler checks (but not in cash). The procedure is the following: you mark it on the Custom declaration, go to Customs, they check your declaration and send you to the secondary desk. There you are given a simple form, fill it up and give it to them. After that you're done. They didn't ask to see the traveler checks or count them, and generally looked completely uninterested and unexcited about the whole process.
No unusual questions were asked by the Customs, but my bank (where I deposited it), asked whether I declared it to the Customs. I said "yes" and they didn't have any further questions.
add a comment |
If this is useful, I've entered the USA twice with way more than $10,000 in traveler checks (but not in cash). The procedure is the following: you mark it on the Custom declaration, go to Customs, they check your declaration and send you to the secondary desk. There you are given a simple form, fill it up and give it to them. After that you're done. They didn't ask to see the traveler checks or count them, and generally looked completely uninterested and unexcited about the whole process.
No unusual questions were asked by the Customs, but my bank (where I deposited it), asked whether I declared it to the Customs. I said "yes" and they didn't have any further questions.
If this is useful, I've entered the USA twice with way more than $10,000 in traveler checks (but not in cash). The procedure is the following: you mark it on the Custom declaration, go to Customs, they check your declaration and send you to the secondary desk. There you are given a simple form, fill it up and give it to them. After that you're done. They didn't ask to see the traveler checks or count them, and generally looked completely uninterested and unexcited about the whole process.
No unusual questions were asked by the Customs, but my bank (where I deposited it), asked whether I declared it to the Customs. I said "yes" and they didn't have any further questions.
answered Dec 30 '17 at 19:18
George Y.George Y.
20.1k13480
20.1k13480
add a comment |
add a comment |
WHO MUST FILE: (1) Each person who physically transports, mails, or
ships, or causes to be physically transported, mailed, or shipped
currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount
exceeding $10,000 at one time from the United States to any place
outside the United States or into the United States from any place
outside the United States, and
(2) Each person who receives in the
United States currency or other monetary instruments In an aggregate
amount exceeding $10,000 at one time which have been transported,
mailed, or shipped to the person from any place outside the United
States.
It looks like you both must file since the last word in the first paragraph is "and". While it is perfectly legal and can attract a lot of undesirable attention from the authorities such as the IRS or the department of homeland security. We did this once as a young white couple with three small children in tow and still got subjected to intense questioning.
First: I would NOT use cash because of risk of loss and high currency exchange fee. If you need a cash-like instrument, use travelers checks. These can be replaced if stolen and typically just have a 1% flat fee. They still are subject to declaration.
Electronic transfers are safer, cheaper, and easier on the paperwork. I use http://www.xe.com/xetrade/ to send money to kids abroad. Many banks these days have direct partnerships with other banks in different countries for mutual use of ATMs and low overhead transfer. For example Bank of America works with Deutsche Bank in Germany, Santander in Mexico, China Construction Bank, Westpac in Australia/NZ etc. I recommend talking to your local bank or finding a Bank in your country with ties to the US.
1
I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?
– tubedogg
Apr 13 '16 at 3:53
add a comment |
WHO MUST FILE: (1) Each person who physically transports, mails, or
ships, or causes to be physically transported, mailed, or shipped
currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount
exceeding $10,000 at one time from the United States to any place
outside the United States or into the United States from any place
outside the United States, and
(2) Each person who receives in the
United States currency or other monetary instruments In an aggregate
amount exceeding $10,000 at one time which have been transported,
mailed, or shipped to the person from any place outside the United
States.
It looks like you both must file since the last word in the first paragraph is "and". While it is perfectly legal and can attract a lot of undesirable attention from the authorities such as the IRS or the department of homeland security. We did this once as a young white couple with three small children in tow and still got subjected to intense questioning.
First: I would NOT use cash because of risk of loss and high currency exchange fee. If you need a cash-like instrument, use travelers checks. These can be replaced if stolen and typically just have a 1% flat fee. They still are subject to declaration.
Electronic transfers are safer, cheaper, and easier on the paperwork. I use http://www.xe.com/xetrade/ to send money to kids abroad. Many banks these days have direct partnerships with other banks in different countries for mutual use of ATMs and low overhead transfer. For example Bank of America works with Deutsche Bank in Germany, Santander in Mexico, China Construction Bank, Westpac in Australia/NZ etc. I recommend talking to your local bank or finding a Bank in your country with ties to the US.
1
I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?
– tubedogg
Apr 13 '16 at 3:53
add a comment |
WHO MUST FILE: (1) Each person who physically transports, mails, or
ships, or causes to be physically transported, mailed, or shipped
currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount
exceeding $10,000 at one time from the United States to any place
outside the United States or into the United States from any place
outside the United States, and
(2) Each person who receives in the
United States currency or other monetary instruments In an aggregate
amount exceeding $10,000 at one time which have been transported,
mailed, or shipped to the person from any place outside the United
States.
It looks like you both must file since the last word in the first paragraph is "and". While it is perfectly legal and can attract a lot of undesirable attention from the authorities such as the IRS or the department of homeland security. We did this once as a young white couple with three small children in tow and still got subjected to intense questioning.
First: I would NOT use cash because of risk of loss and high currency exchange fee. If you need a cash-like instrument, use travelers checks. These can be replaced if stolen and typically just have a 1% flat fee. They still are subject to declaration.
Electronic transfers are safer, cheaper, and easier on the paperwork. I use http://www.xe.com/xetrade/ to send money to kids abroad. Many banks these days have direct partnerships with other banks in different countries for mutual use of ATMs and low overhead transfer. For example Bank of America works with Deutsche Bank in Germany, Santander in Mexico, China Construction Bank, Westpac in Australia/NZ etc. I recommend talking to your local bank or finding a Bank in your country with ties to the US.
WHO MUST FILE: (1) Each person who physically transports, mails, or
ships, or causes to be physically transported, mailed, or shipped
currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount
exceeding $10,000 at one time from the United States to any place
outside the United States or into the United States from any place
outside the United States, and
(2) Each person who receives in the
United States currency or other monetary instruments In an aggregate
amount exceeding $10,000 at one time which have been transported,
mailed, or shipped to the person from any place outside the United
States.
It looks like you both must file since the last word in the first paragraph is "and". While it is perfectly legal and can attract a lot of undesirable attention from the authorities such as the IRS or the department of homeland security. We did this once as a young white couple with three small children in tow and still got subjected to intense questioning.
First: I would NOT use cash because of risk of loss and high currency exchange fee. If you need a cash-like instrument, use travelers checks. These can be replaced if stolen and typically just have a 1% flat fee. They still are subject to declaration.
Electronic transfers are safer, cheaper, and easier on the paperwork. I use http://www.xe.com/xetrade/ to send money to kids abroad. Many banks these days have direct partnerships with other banks in different countries for mutual use of ATMs and low overhead transfer. For example Bank of America works with Deutsche Bank in Germany, Santander in Mexico, China Construction Bank, Westpac in Australia/NZ etc. I recommend talking to your local bank or finding a Bank in your country with ties to the US.
answered Apr 9 '16 at 18:55
HilmarHilmar
23.1k13774
23.1k13774
1
I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?
– tubedogg
Apr 13 '16 at 3:53
add a comment |
1
I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?
– tubedogg
Apr 13 '16 at 3:53
1
1
I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?
– tubedogg
Apr 13 '16 at 3:53
I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?
– tubedogg
Apr 13 '16 at 3:53
add a comment |
I am writing this because of "J Bergen"s poor answer. Bergen gives some bad advice.
- You can bring as much currency into the country as you want, as long as you declare it. Otherwise, there will be penalties
- NEVER STRUCTURE YOUR MONEY: i.e. bring in amounts under $10,000 multiple times. That's as bad as not declaring, and could see your visa revoked.
- Western Union is not good
- If you are unsure if the total amount of money (in any currency) you have anywhere (in your bags, pockets, shoe, etc) is equivalent to US$10,000 or more, DECLARE
add a comment |
I am writing this because of "J Bergen"s poor answer. Bergen gives some bad advice.
- You can bring as much currency into the country as you want, as long as you declare it. Otherwise, there will be penalties
- NEVER STRUCTURE YOUR MONEY: i.e. bring in amounts under $10,000 multiple times. That's as bad as not declaring, and could see your visa revoked.
- Western Union is not good
- If you are unsure if the total amount of money (in any currency) you have anywhere (in your bags, pockets, shoe, etc) is equivalent to US$10,000 or more, DECLARE
add a comment |
I am writing this because of "J Bergen"s poor answer. Bergen gives some bad advice.
- You can bring as much currency into the country as you want, as long as you declare it. Otherwise, there will be penalties
- NEVER STRUCTURE YOUR MONEY: i.e. bring in amounts under $10,000 multiple times. That's as bad as not declaring, and could see your visa revoked.
- Western Union is not good
- If you are unsure if the total amount of money (in any currency) you have anywhere (in your bags, pockets, shoe, etc) is equivalent to US$10,000 or more, DECLARE
I am writing this because of "J Bergen"s poor answer. Bergen gives some bad advice.
- You can bring as much currency into the country as you want, as long as you declare it. Otherwise, there will be penalties
- NEVER STRUCTURE YOUR MONEY: i.e. bring in amounts under $10,000 multiple times. That's as bad as not declaring, and could see your visa revoked.
- Western Union is not good
- If you are unsure if the total amount of money (in any currency) you have anywhere (in your bags, pockets, shoe, etc) is equivalent to US$10,000 or more, DECLARE
answered Feb 27 '18 at 22:17
Matthew BarclayMatthew Barclay
4381410
4381410
add a comment |
add a comment |
The USA is a country with an effective, reliable banking system that does a good job serving consumers with virtually no graft or theft. As such, the only people who handle large quantities of cash are:
- fools
- criminals
This may differ dramatically from your country. The US government is primarily concerned with the second, and cares less about the property rights of the first. "A fool and his money..."
So it may be standard practice in your country to deal in cash, but in America it will get a frosty reception because of these prejudices. With an underlying assumption that more likely than not, it is in America's best interests to separate you from your money. There will be a mechanism by which you can appeal for its return, but this could cost a big chunk of $12,500 in lawyer costs.
The way America expects you to do this is via the trusted, western banking system. For instance have your friend generate an invoice on PayPal for the goods or services, and pay them via PayPal. If for some reason you can't do conventional electronic transfers, you need to fix why that is.
Bringing in cash because electronic transfers don't work is just the kind of thing they're on guard for. Customs will know the reasons your wire transfers were disallowed, and will be wary of cash moving on the same route. Effectively you're circumventing the normal way of doing this.
That isn't structuring, but they have a lot in common.
The upshot is that bringing large blocks of cash is a fool's game, and you should expect problems.
add a comment |
The USA is a country with an effective, reliable banking system that does a good job serving consumers with virtually no graft or theft. As such, the only people who handle large quantities of cash are:
- fools
- criminals
This may differ dramatically from your country. The US government is primarily concerned with the second, and cares less about the property rights of the first. "A fool and his money..."
So it may be standard practice in your country to deal in cash, but in America it will get a frosty reception because of these prejudices. With an underlying assumption that more likely than not, it is in America's best interests to separate you from your money. There will be a mechanism by which you can appeal for its return, but this could cost a big chunk of $12,500 in lawyer costs.
The way America expects you to do this is via the trusted, western banking system. For instance have your friend generate an invoice on PayPal for the goods or services, and pay them via PayPal. If for some reason you can't do conventional electronic transfers, you need to fix why that is.
Bringing in cash because electronic transfers don't work is just the kind of thing they're on guard for. Customs will know the reasons your wire transfers were disallowed, and will be wary of cash moving on the same route. Effectively you're circumventing the normal way of doing this.
That isn't structuring, but they have a lot in common.
The upshot is that bringing large blocks of cash is a fool's game, and you should expect problems.
add a comment |
The USA is a country with an effective, reliable banking system that does a good job serving consumers with virtually no graft or theft. As such, the only people who handle large quantities of cash are:
- fools
- criminals
This may differ dramatically from your country. The US government is primarily concerned with the second, and cares less about the property rights of the first. "A fool and his money..."
So it may be standard practice in your country to deal in cash, but in America it will get a frosty reception because of these prejudices. With an underlying assumption that more likely than not, it is in America's best interests to separate you from your money. There will be a mechanism by which you can appeal for its return, but this could cost a big chunk of $12,500 in lawyer costs.
The way America expects you to do this is via the trusted, western banking system. For instance have your friend generate an invoice on PayPal for the goods or services, and pay them via PayPal. If for some reason you can't do conventional electronic transfers, you need to fix why that is.
Bringing in cash because electronic transfers don't work is just the kind of thing they're on guard for. Customs will know the reasons your wire transfers were disallowed, and will be wary of cash moving on the same route. Effectively you're circumventing the normal way of doing this.
That isn't structuring, but they have a lot in common.
The upshot is that bringing large blocks of cash is a fool's game, and you should expect problems.
The USA is a country with an effective, reliable banking system that does a good job serving consumers with virtually no graft or theft. As such, the only people who handle large quantities of cash are:
- fools
- criminals
This may differ dramatically from your country. The US government is primarily concerned with the second, and cares less about the property rights of the first. "A fool and his money..."
So it may be standard practice in your country to deal in cash, but in America it will get a frosty reception because of these prejudices. With an underlying assumption that more likely than not, it is in America's best interests to separate you from your money. There will be a mechanism by which you can appeal for its return, but this could cost a big chunk of $12,500 in lawyer costs.
The way America expects you to do this is via the trusted, western banking system. For instance have your friend generate an invoice on PayPal for the goods or services, and pay them via PayPal. If for some reason you can't do conventional electronic transfers, you need to fix why that is.
Bringing in cash because electronic transfers don't work is just the kind of thing they're on guard for. Customs will know the reasons your wire transfers were disallowed, and will be wary of cash moving on the same route. Effectively you're circumventing the normal way of doing this.
That isn't structuring, but they have a lot in common.
The upshot is that bringing large blocks of cash is a fool's game, and you should expect problems.
edited Jan 26 at 17:36
answered Jan 26 at 17:31
HarperHarper
12.5k32361
12.5k32361
add a comment |
add a comment |
Don't do it! Also check how much the Country you are going to allows you to come in with! It is a scam in many places. America allows you $10,000 do not be a penney over that amount even in change or they will steal it from you! Or tie you up so you miss your flight. Some Countries do to exchange rate allow a little less than that. So on arrival they will steal it from you! As you are over there amount to bring in. 3rd world Countries are good for this scam! Set up a Western Union acount & wire yourself the money to were ever. If they have Western Union there. Then bring in $6,000 at a time on 2 transfers.
2
You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good
– Matthew Barclay
Feb 27 '18 at 22:12
add a comment |
Don't do it! Also check how much the Country you are going to allows you to come in with! It is a scam in many places. America allows you $10,000 do not be a penney over that amount even in change or they will steal it from you! Or tie you up so you miss your flight. Some Countries do to exchange rate allow a little less than that. So on arrival they will steal it from you! As you are over there amount to bring in. 3rd world Countries are good for this scam! Set up a Western Union acount & wire yourself the money to were ever. If they have Western Union there. Then bring in $6,000 at a time on 2 transfers.
2
You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good
– Matthew Barclay
Feb 27 '18 at 22:12
add a comment |
Don't do it! Also check how much the Country you are going to allows you to come in with! It is a scam in many places. America allows you $10,000 do not be a penney over that amount even in change or they will steal it from you! Or tie you up so you miss your flight. Some Countries do to exchange rate allow a little less than that. So on arrival they will steal it from you! As you are over there amount to bring in. 3rd world Countries are good for this scam! Set up a Western Union acount & wire yourself the money to were ever. If they have Western Union there. Then bring in $6,000 at a time on 2 transfers.
Don't do it! Also check how much the Country you are going to allows you to come in with! It is a scam in many places. America allows you $10,000 do not be a penney over that amount even in change or they will steal it from you! Or tie you up so you miss your flight. Some Countries do to exchange rate allow a little less than that. So on arrival they will steal it from you! As you are over there amount to bring in. 3rd world Countries are good for this scam! Set up a Western Union acount & wire yourself the money to were ever. If they have Western Union there. Then bring in $6,000 at a time on 2 transfers.
answered Dec 30 '17 at 21:31
J BergenJ Bergen
25313
25313
2
You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good
– Matthew Barclay
Feb 27 '18 at 22:12
add a comment |
2
You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good
– Matthew Barclay
Feb 27 '18 at 22:12
2
2
You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good
– Matthew Barclay
Feb 27 '18 at 22:12
You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good
– Matthew Barclay
Feb 27 '18 at 22:12
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66328%2fusa-travelling-with-more-than-usd-10-000%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.
– Zach Lipton
Apr 8 '16 at 23:42
3
I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?
– Patricia Shanahan
Apr 9 '16 at 0:52
1
@PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)
– debuggerpk
Apr 9 '16 at 9:58
1
Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!
– pbu
Apr 9 '16 at 12:58
1
@pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.
– Relaxed
Aug 24 '16 at 22:37