USA, travelling with more than USD 10,000



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8















I will be leaving for USA in a little while, and I plan to carry around USD 12,500. I will be visiting my son there, and I will hand over that cash to him then.



As I understand, if the amount is more than USD 10,000 you must declare it, using this form.



However, it states




Each person who receives currency or other monetary instruments in the
United States shall file FinCEN Form 105, within 15 days after receipt
of the currency or monetary instruments, with the Customs officer in
charge at any port of entry or departure or by mail with the
Commissioner of Customs, Attention: Currency Transportation Reports,
Washington DC 20229.




After I have handed the money over to my son, will my son need to declare it? Also, what other documentation would I be needing if the cash exceeds USD 10,000?



I have already searched through this link, and haven't found what I am looking for.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.

    – Zach Lipton
    Apr 8 '16 at 23:42






  • 3





    I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?

    – Patricia Shanahan
    Apr 9 '16 at 0:52






  • 1





    @PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)

    – debuggerpk
    Apr 9 '16 at 9:58






  • 1





    Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!

    – pbu
    Apr 9 '16 at 12:58






  • 1





    @pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.

    – Relaxed
    Aug 24 '16 at 22:37

















8















I will be leaving for USA in a little while, and I plan to carry around USD 12,500. I will be visiting my son there, and I will hand over that cash to him then.



As I understand, if the amount is more than USD 10,000 you must declare it, using this form.



However, it states




Each person who receives currency or other monetary instruments in the
United States shall file FinCEN Form 105, within 15 days after receipt
of the currency or monetary instruments, with the Customs officer in
charge at any port of entry or departure or by mail with the
Commissioner of Customs, Attention: Currency Transportation Reports,
Washington DC 20229.




After I have handed the money over to my son, will my son need to declare it? Also, what other documentation would I be needing if the cash exceeds USD 10,000?



I have already searched through this link, and haven't found what I am looking for.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.

    – Zach Lipton
    Apr 8 '16 at 23:42






  • 3





    I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?

    – Patricia Shanahan
    Apr 9 '16 at 0:52






  • 1





    @PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)

    – debuggerpk
    Apr 9 '16 at 9:58






  • 1





    Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!

    – pbu
    Apr 9 '16 at 12:58






  • 1





    @pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.

    – Relaxed
    Aug 24 '16 at 22:37













8












8








8








I will be leaving for USA in a little while, and I plan to carry around USD 12,500. I will be visiting my son there, and I will hand over that cash to him then.



As I understand, if the amount is more than USD 10,000 you must declare it, using this form.



However, it states




Each person who receives currency or other monetary instruments in the
United States shall file FinCEN Form 105, within 15 days after receipt
of the currency or monetary instruments, with the Customs officer in
charge at any port of entry or departure or by mail with the
Commissioner of Customs, Attention: Currency Transportation Reports,
Washington DC 20229.




After I have handed the money over to my son, will my son need to declare it? Also, what other documentation would I be needing if the cash exceeds USD 10,000?



I have already searched through this link, and haven't found what I am looking for.










share|improve this question
















I will be leaving for USA in a little while, and I plan to carry around USD 12,500. I will be visiting my son there, and I will hand over that cash to him then.



As I understand, if the amount is more than USD 10,000 you must declare it, using this form.



However, it states




Each person who receives currency or other monetary instruments in the
United States shall file FinCEN Form 105, within 15 days after receipt
of the currency or monetary instruments, with the Customs officer in
charge at any port of entry or departure or by mail with the
Commissioner of Customs, Attention: Currency Transportation Reports,
Washington DC 20229.




After I have handed the money over to my son, will my son need to declare it? Also, what other documentation would I be needing if the cash exceeds USD 10,000?



I have already searched through this link, and haven't found what I am looking for.







usa customs-and-immigration money






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:52









Community

1




1










asked Apr 8 '16 at 22:03









debuggerpkdebuggerpk

14315




14315







  • 2





    If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.

    – Zach Lipton
    Apr 8 '16 at 23:42






  • 3





    I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?

    – Patricia Shanahan
    Apr 9 '16 at 0:52






  • 1





    @PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)

    – debuggerpk
    Apr 9 '16 at 9:58






  • 1





    Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!

    – pbu
    Apr 9 '16 at 12:58






  • 1





    @pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.

    – Relaxed
    Aug 24 '16 at 22:37












  • 2





    If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.

    – Zach Lipton
    Apr 8 '16 at 23:42






  • 3





    I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?

    – Patricia Shanahan
    Apr 9 '16 at 0:52






  • 1





    @PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)

    – debuggerpk
    Apr 9 '16 at 9:58






  • 1





    Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!

    – pbu
    Apr 9 '16 at 12:58






  • 1





    @pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.

    – Relaxed
    Aug 24 '16 at 22:37







2




2





If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.

– Zach Lipton
Apr 8 '16 at 23:42





If you get any further questions, it will be very useful if you have documentation that indicates the source of the cash and can demonstrate that it comes from legal activities.

– Zach Lipton
Apr 8 '16 at 23:42




3




3





I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?

– Patricia Shanahan
Apr 9 '16 at 0:52





I've needed to transfer rather larger sums of money into the USA, and used electronic funds transfer. Have you considered doing that?

– Patricia Shanahan
Apr 9 '16 at 0:52




1




1





@PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)

– debuggerpk
Apr 9 '16 at 9:58





@PatriciaShanahan yes, i tried doing, thrice, and my wire was rejected thrice. Since I am going anyways, i thought i should ask if taking the bany by hand would be legal :)

– debuggerpk
Apr 9 '16 at 9:58




1




1





Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!

– pbu
Apr 9 '16 at 12:58





Why dont you just issue a check, if you are wire transfers are not going through. You can also carry the check rather than cash!

– pbu
Apr 9 '16 at 12:58




1




1





@pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.

– Relaxed
Aug 24 '16 at 22:37





@pbu Checks need to be declared too so that doesn't really change anything.

– Relaxed
Aug 24 '16 at 22:37










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















8














The form instructions state that the declaration only needs to be made once. You don't need to do it twice.




An additional report of a particular transportation, mailing, or shipping of currency or the monetary instruments is not required if a complete and truthful report has already been filed.




Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported. You are importing the currency, so you will file the declaration.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    "Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.

    – phoog
    Apr 8 '16 at 23:46






  • 4





    @phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.

    – Michael Hampton
    Apr 9 '16 at 0:00












  • I don't think this is correct. See my answer

    – Hilmar
    Apr 9 '16 at 18:38











  • @Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!

    – Michael Hampton
    Apr 9 '16 at 18:42











  • @MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx

    – Burhan Khalid
    Apr 10 '16 at 6:53


















11














Travelling in the United States with such a huge amount of cash is extremely dangerous because civil forfeiture. Your money can be taken at the airport, by the security at the airport a routine traffic stop and practically anywhere else. Once the cops seize the cash they will not charge you (often they won't have anything to charge you with) but the money itself and you will have a lot of difficulties getting it back.






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).

    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 9 '16 at 2:38







  • 5





    I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.

    – chx
    Apr 9 '16 at 2:42






  • 2





    I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.

    – user13044
    Apr 9 '16 at 4:28






  • 5





    Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.

    – David Richerby
    Apr 9 '16 at 6:09







  • 6





    Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.

    – Stephan Branczyk
    Apr 9 '16 at 19:32



















4














If you send the money by a bank wire to your son, then the banks will file the proper notification paperwork at both ends.



If you carry it into the country in cash, then you need to declare that fact and fill out FinCEN Form 105 for your trip, as you have noted. But you are not "importing" it rather you are "carrying" it in. - https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/more%20than%20$10000%20cash/



The "receiving person" details mentioned in your post would apply if you sent the money by courier or other means where the responsible party is not physically moving the money. It also applies to bank wires, but the banks usually handle the declaration paperwork for their customers automatically.



There maybe restrictions or declarations in your country of origin to consider as well.



If your son deposits it into his US bank account, then the bank will have to declare that deposit as it is over $10K. But that again is paperwork the bank will handle automatically, with perhaps a few questions for your son.






share|improve this answer

























  • Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable

    – Andrew Lazarus
    Apr 9 '16 at 5:41






  • 1





    Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).

    – user13044
    Apr 9 '16 at 6:00


















3














I would be very careful in the United States with cash, due to Asset Forfeiture.



It's hard to say how high the risk or frequency, but there seem to be many incidents of this occurring. Of the cases I have followed where there is no justifiable cause, most have been unable to get any of their money back even after long legal processes. In some cases the asset owner has been able to negotiate return of a small percentage.



The frequency seems to be higher with local law enforcement, but also exists with state and federal. These cases are kept quiet and charges are rarely levied.






share|improve this answer






























    3














    If this is useful, I've entered the USA twice with way more than $10,000 in traveler checks (but not in cash). The procedure is the following: you mark it on the Custom declaration, go to Customs, they check your declaration and send you to the secondary desk. There you are given a simple form, fill it up and give it to them. After that you're done. They didn't ask to see the traveler checks or count them, and generally looked completely uninterested and unexcited about the whole process.



    No unusual questions were asked by the Customs, but my bank (where I deposited it), asked whether I declared it to the Customs. I said "yes" and they didn't have any further questions.






    share|improve this answer






























      2















      WHO MUST FILE: (1) Each person who physically transports, mails, or
      ships, or causes to be physically transported, mailed, or shipped
      currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount
      exceeding $10,000 at one time from the United States to any place
      outside the United States or into the United States from any place
      outside the United States, and



      (2) Each person who receives in the
      United States currency or other monetary instruments In an aggregate
      amount exceeding $10,000 at one time which have been transported,
      mailed, or shipped to the person from any place outside the United
      States.




      It looks like you both must file since the last word in the first paragraph is "and". While it is perfectly legal and can attract a lot of undesirable attention from the authorities such as the IRS or the department of homeland security. We did this once as a young white couple with three small children in tow and still got subjected to intense questioning.



      First: I would NOT use cash because of risk of loss and high currency exchange fee. If you need a cash-like instrument, use travelers checks. These can be replaced if stolen and typically just have a 1% flat fee. They still are subject to declaration.



      Electronic transfers are safer, cheaper, and easier on the paperwork. I use http://www.xe.com/xetrade/ to send money to kids abroad. Many banks these days have direct partnerships with other banks in different countries for mutual use of ATMs and low overhead transfer. For example Bank of America works with Deutsche Bank in Germany, Santander in Mexico, China Construction Bank, Westpac in Australia/NZ etc. I recommend talking to your local bank or finding a Bank in your country with ties to the US.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?

        – tubedogg
        Apr 13 '16 at 3:53



















      2














      I am writing this because of "J Bergen"s poor answer. Bergen gives some bad advice.



      1. You can bring as much currency into the country as you want, as long as you declare it. Otherwise, there will be penalties

      2. NEVER STRUCTURE YOUR MONEY: i.e. bring in amounts under $10,000 multiple times. That's as bad as not declaring, and could see your visa revoked.

      3. Western Union is not good

      4. If you are unsure if the total amount of money (in any currency) you have anywhere (in your bags, pockets, shoe, etc) is equivalent to US$10,000 or more, DECLARE





      share|improve this answer






























        0














        The USA is a country with an effective, reliable banking system that does a good job serving consumers with virtually no graft or theft. As such, the only people who handle large quantities of cash are:



        • fools

        • criminals

        This may differ dramatically from your country. The US government is primarily concerned with the second, and cares less about the property rights of the first. "A fool and his money..."



        So it may be standard practice in your country to deal in cash, but in America it will get a frosty reception because of these prejudices. With an underlying assumption that more likely than not, it is in America's best interests to separate you from your money. There will be a mechanism by which you can appeal for its return, but this could cost a big chunk of $12,500 in lawyer costs.



        The way America expects you to do this is via the trusted, western banking system. For instance have your friend generate an invoice on PayPal for the goods or services, and pay them via PayPal. If for some reason you can't do conventional electronic transfers, you need to fix why that is.



        Bringing in cash because electronic transfers don't work is just the kind of thing they're on guard for. Customs will know the reasons your wire transfers were disallowed, and will be wary of cash moving on the same route. Effectively you're circumventing the normal way of doing this.



        That isn't structuring, but they have a lot in common.



        The upshot is that bringing large blocks of cash is a fool's game, and you should expect problems.






        share|improve this answer
































          -4














          Don't do it! Also check how much the Country you are going to allows you to come in with! It is a scam in many places. America allows you $10,000 do not be a penney over that amount even in change or they will steal it from you! Or tie you up so you miss your flight. Some Countries do to exchange rate allow a little less than that. So on arrival they will steal it from you! As you are over there amount to bring in. 3rd world Countries are good for this scam! Set up a Western Union acount & wire yourself the money to were ever. If they have Western Union there. Then bring in $6,000 at a time on 2 transfers.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 2





            You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good

            – Matthew Barclay
            Feb 27 '18 at 22:12












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "273"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66328%2fusa-travelling-with-more-than-usd-10-000%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          9 Answers
          9






          active

          oldest

          votes








          9 Answers
          9






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8














          The form instructions state that the declaration only needs to be made once. You don't need to do it twice.




          An additional report of a particular transportation, mailing, or shipping of currency or the monetary instruments is not required if a complete and truthful report has already been filed.




          Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported. You are importing the currency, so you will file the declaration.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            "Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.

            – phoog
            Apr 8 '16 at 23:46






          • 4





            @phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.

            – Michael Hampton
            Apr 9 '16 at 0:00












          • I don't think this is correct. See my answer

            – Hilmar
            Apr 9 '16 at 18:38











          • @Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!

            – Michael Hampton
            Apr 9 '16 at 18:42











          • @MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx

            – Burhan Khalid
            Apr 10 '16 at 6:53















          8














          The form instructions state that the declaration only needs to be made once. You don't need to do it twice.




          An additional report of a particular transportation, mailing, or shipping of currency or the monetary instruments is not required if a complete and truthful report has already been filed.




          Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported. You are importing the currency, so you will file the declaration.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            "Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.

            – phoog
            Apr 8 '16 at 23:46






          • 4





            @phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.

            – Michael Hampton
            Apr 9 '16 at 0:00












          • I don't think this is correct. See my answer

            – Hilmar
            Apr 9 '16 at 18:38











          • @Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!

            – Michael Hampton
            Apr 9 '16 at 18:42











          • @MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx

            – Burhan Khalid
            Apr 10 '16 at 6:53













          8












          8








          8







          The form instructions state that the declaration only needs to be made once. You don't need to do it twice.




          An additional report of a particular transportation, mailing, or shipping of currency or the monetary instruments is not required if a complete and truthful report has already been filed.




          Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported. You are importing the currency, so you will file the declaration.






          share|improve this answer













          The form instructions state that the declaration only needs to be made once. You don't need to do it twice.




          An additional report of a particular transportation, mailing, or shipping of currency or the monetary instruments is not required if a complete and truthful report has already been filed.




          Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported. You are importing the currency, so you will file the declaration.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 8 '16 at 22:27









          Michael HamptonMichael Hampton

          38.3k385170




          38.3k385170







          • 1





            "Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.

            – phoog
            Apr 8 '16 at 23:46






          • 4





            @phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.

            – Michael Hampton
            Apr 9 '16 at 0:00












          • I don't think this is correct. See my answer

            – Hilmar
            Apr 9 '16 at 18:38











          • @Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!

            – Michael Hampton
            Apr 9 '16 at 18:42











          • @MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx

            – Burhan Khalid
            Apr 10 '16 at 6:53












          • 1





            "Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.

            – phoog
            Apr 8 '16 at 23:46






          • 4





            @phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.

            – Michael Hampton
            Apr 9 '16 at 0:00












          • I don't think this is correct. See my answer

            – Hilmar
            Apr 9 '16 at 18:38











          • @Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!

            – Michael Hampton
            Apr 9 '16 at 18:42











          • @MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx

            – Burhan Khalid
            Apr 10 '16 at 6:53







          1




          1





          "Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.

          – phoog
          Apr 8 '16 at 23:46





          "Your son does not need to file a report anyway, since he is not the person importing the currency or causing it to be imported": paragraph b under "who must file" says recipients must file, and makes no mention of whether they've caused the currency to be imported. The only basis for not filing as far as I can see is the passage you have quoted. If the son were to receive the money without knowing whether the father had filed, he would need to file.

          – phoog
          Apr 8 '16 at 23:46




          4




          4





          @phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.

          – Michael Hampton
          Apr 9 '16 at 0:00






          @phoog He may be receiving currency, but he is not importing it. That is the important part. Nothing here is relevant to someone who isn't importing or exporting currency or instruments. If he had had it shipped to him by FedEx or something, then he would be the importer and the recipient in this context.

          – Michael Hampton
          Apr 9 '16 at 0:00














          I don't think this is correct. See my answer

          – Hilmar
          Apr 9 '16 at 18:38





          I don't think this is correct. See my answer

          – Hilmar
          Apr 9 '16 at 18:38













          @Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!

          – Michael Hampton
          Apr 9 '16 at 18:42





          @Hilmar You haven't posted an answer!

          – Michael Hampton
          Apr 9 '16 at 18:42













          @MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx

          – Burhan Khalid
          Apr 10 '16 at 6:53





          @MichaelHampton you can't ship currency or currency instruments using FedEx

          – Burhan Khalid
          Apr 10 '16 at 6:53













          11














          Travelling in the United States with such a huge amount of cash is extremely dangerous because civil forfeiture. Your money can be taken at the airport, by the security at the airport a routine traffic stop and practically anywhere else. Once the cops seize the cash they will not charge you (often they won't have anything to charge you with) but the money itself and you will have a lot of difficulties getting it back.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 3





            Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).

            – Nate Eldredge
            Apr 9 '16 at 2:38







          • 5





            I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.

            – chx
            Apr 9 '16 at 2:42






          • 2





            I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.

            – user13044
            Apr 9 '16 at 4:28






          • 5





            Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.

            – David Richerby
            Apr 9 '16 at 6:09







          • 6





            Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.

            – Stephan Branczyk
            Apr 9 '16 at 19:32
















          11














          Travelling in the United States with such a huge amount of cash is extremely dangerous because civil forfeiture. Your money can be taken at the airport, by the security at the airport a routine traffic stop and practically anywhere else. Once the cops seize the cash they will not charge you (often they won't have anything to charge you with) but the money itself and you will have a lot of difficulties getting it back.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 3





            Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).

            – Nate Eldredge
            Apr 9 '16 at 2:38







          • 5





            I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.

            – chx
            Apr 9 '16 at 2:42






          • 2





            I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.

            – user13044
            Apr 9 '16 at 4:28






          • 5





            Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.

            – David Richerby
            Apr 9 '16 at 6:09







          • 6





            Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.

            – Stephan Branczyk
            Apr 9 '16 at 19:32














          11












          11








          11







          Travelling in the United States with such a huge amount of cash is extremely dangerous because civil forfeiture. Your money can be taken at the airport, by the security at the airport a routine traffic stop and practically anywhere else. Once the cops seize the cash they will not charge you (often they won't have anything to charge you with) but the money itself and you will have a lot of difficulties getting it back.






          share|improve this answer













          Travelling in the United States with such a huge amount of cash is extremely dangerous because civil forfeiture. Your money can be taken at the airport, by the security at the airport a routine traffic stop and practically anywhere else. Once the cops seize the cash they will not charge you (often they won't have anything to charge you with) but the money itself and you will have a lot of difficulties getting it back.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 9 '16 at 0:44









          chxchx

          38.9k485192




          38.9k485192







          • 3





            Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).

            – Nate Eldredge
            Apr 9 '16 at 2:38







          • 5





            I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.

            – chx
            Apr 9 '16 at 2:42






          • 2





            I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.

            – user13044
            Apr 9 '16 at 4:28






          • 5





            Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.

            – David Richerby
            Apr 9 '16 at 6:09







          • 6





            Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.

            – Stephan Branczyk
            Apr 9 '16 at 19:32













          • 3





            Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).

            – Nate Eldredge
            Apr 9 '16 at 2:38







          • 5





            I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.

            – chx
            Apr 9 '16 at 2:42






          • 2





            I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.

            – user13044
            Apr 9 '16 at 4:28






          • 5





            Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.

            – David Richerby
            Apr 9 '16 at 6:09







          • 6





            Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.

            – Stephan Branczyk
            Apr 9 '16 at 19:32








          3




          3





          Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).

          – Nate Eldredge
          Apr 9 '16 at 2:38






          Carrying cash is inherently risky. Is there any evidence that the risk of legal seizure is significantly higher than other inherent risks (loss, accidental destruction, theft)? If not, it seems excessive to call out this specific risk among others. (And after all, at least in principle, money seized in this way can be recovered by legal means, unlike cash accidentally destroyed or stolen).

          – Nate Eldredge
          Apr 9 '16 at 2:38





          5




          5





          I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.

          – chx
          Apr 9 '16 at 2:42





          I'd say most people are acutely aware of such problems and will prepare accordingly -- money belt etc but this is a much more obscure (especially for someone not living in the US) danger.

          – chx
          Apr 9 '16 at 2:42




          2




          2





          I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.

          – user13044
          Apr 9 '16 at 4:28





          I would be curious to see statistics on this "extremely dangerous" action. How many travelers (what percentage) have been effected by this? Isolated incidents do not equate to a risk factor, rather they only contribute to paranoia.

          – user13044
          Apr 9 '16 at 4:28




          5




          5





          Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.

          – David Richerby
          Apr 9 '16 at 6:09






          Being careful to have less that $20 on you when going through a US airport is an act of paranoia. All three stories you link to involve people carrying unusually large amounts of cash, which is what sparked suspicion. That's highly relevant to this question but there is zero reason for anybody to worry about carrying a couple-few hundred dollars in cash through an American airport.

          – David Richerby
          Apr 9 '16 at 6:09





          6




          6





          Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.

          – Stephan Branczyk
          Apr 9 '16 at 19:32






          Carrying less than $20 USD when going through a USA airport is the most risky behavior. You never know when an airline will lose your luggages, or delay you by a day or two, or charge you $10 USD for a small bag of peanuts (that used to be given out for free). And yes, credit cards will work in most cases, but cash still reigns supreme when the infrastructure is down because of a blizzard, or if your credit card got temporarily deactivated because your bank thinks you were acting suspicious by traveling to a different country.

          – Stephan Branczyk
          Apr 9 '16 at 19:32












          4














          If you send the money by a bank wire to your son, then the banks will file the proper notification paperwork at both ends.



          If you carry it into the country in cash, then you need to declare that fact and fill out FinCEN Form 105 for your trip, as you have noted. But you are not "importing" it rather you are "carrying" it in. - https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/more%20than%20$10000%20cash/



          The "receiving person" details mentioned in your post would apply if you sent the money by courier or other means where the responsible party is not physically moving the money. It also applies to bank wires, but the banks usually handle the declaration paperwork for their customers automatically.



          There maybe restrictions or declarations in your country of origin to consider as well.



          If your son deposits it into his US bank account, then the bank will have to declare that deposit as it is over $10K. But that again is paperwork the bank will handle automatically, with perhaps a few questions for your son.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable

            – Andrew Lazarus
            Apr 9 '16 at 5:41






          • 1





            Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).

            – user13044
            Apr 9 '16 at 6:00















          4














          If you send the money by a bank wire to your son, then the banks will file the proper notification paperwork at both ends.



          If you carry it into the country in cash, then you need to declare that fact and fill out FinCEN Form 105 for your trip, as you have noted. But you are not "importing" it rather you are "carrying" it in. - https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/more%20than%20$10000%20cash/



          The "receiving person" details mentioned in your post would apply if you sent the money by courier or other means where the responsible party is not physically moving the money. It also applies to bank wires, but the banks usually handle the declaration paperwork for their customers automatically.



          There maybe restrictions or declarations in your country of origin to consider as well.



          If your son deposits it into his US bank account, then the bank will have to declare that deposit as it is over $10K. But that again is paperwork the bank will handle automatically, with perhaps a few questions for your son.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable

            – Andrew Lazarus
            Apr 9 '16 at 5:41






          • 1





            Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).

            – user13044
            Apr 9 '16 at 6:00













          4












          4








          4







          If you send the money by a bank wire to your son, then the banks will file the proper notification paperwork at both ends.



          If you carry it into the country in cash, then you need to declare that fact and fill out FinCEN Form 105 for your trip, as you have noted. But you are not "importing" it rather you are "carrying" it in. - https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/more%20than%20$10000%20cash/



          The "receiving person" details mentioned in your post would apply if you sent the money by courier or other means where the responsible party is not physically moving the money. It also applies to bank wires, but the banks usually handle the declaration paperwork for their customers automatically.



          There maybe restrictions or declarations in your country of origin to consider as well.



          If your son deposits it into his US bank account, then the bank will have to declare that deposit as it is over $10K. But that again is paperwork the bank will handle automatically, with perhaps a few questions for your son.






          share|improve this answer















          If you send the money by a bank wire to your son, then the banks will file the proper notification paperwork at both ends.



          If you carry it into the country in cash, then you need to declare that fact and fill out FinCEN Form 105 for your trip, as you have noted. But you are not "importing" it rather you are "carrying" it in. - https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/more%20than%20$10000%20cash/



          The "receiving person" details mentioned in your post would apply if you sent the money by courier or other means where the responsible party is not physically moving the money. It also applies to bank wires, but the banks usually handle the declaration paperwork for their customers automatically.



          There maybe restrictions or declarations in your country of origin to consider as well.



          If your son deposits it into his US bank account, then the bank will have to declare that deposit as it is over $10K. But that again is paperwork the bank will handle automatically, with perhaps a few questions for your son.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 9 '16 at 5:56

























          answered Apr 9 '16 at 1:35







          user13044



















          • Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable

            – Andrew Lazarus
            Apr 9 '16 at 5:41






          • 1





            Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).

            – user13044
            Apr 9 '16 at 6:00

















          • Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable

            – Andrew Lazarus
            Apr 9 '16 at 5:41






          • 1





            Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).

            – user13044
            Apr 9 '16 at 6:00
















          Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable

          – Andrew Lazarus
          Apr 9 '16 at 5:41





          Large gifts are taxable to the donor (!), not the recipient. irs.gov/uac/Eight-Tips-to-Determine-if-Your-Gift-is-Taxable

          – Andrew Lazarus
          Apr 9 '16 at 5:41




          1




          1





          Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).

          – user13044
          Apr 9 '16 at 6:00





          Answer edited. But ultimately, we don't know what the money is for (gift, loan, living expenses, etc) or what its source is (wages for remote work, dad's bank account, etc).

          – user13044
          Apr 9 '16 at 6:00











          3














          I would be very careful in the United States with cash, due to Asset Forfeiture.



          It's hard to say how high the risk or frequency, but there seem to be many incidents of this occurring. Of the cases I have followed where there is no justifiable cause, most have been unable to get any of their money back even after long legal processes. In some cases the asset owner has been able to negotiate return of a small percentage.



          The frequency seems to be higher with local law enforcement, but also exists with state and federal. These cases are kept quiet and charges are rarely levied.






          share|improve this answer



























            3














            I would be very careful in the United States with cash, due to Asset Forfeiture.



            It's hard to say how high the risk or frequency, but there seem to be many incidents of this occurring. Of the cases I have followed where there is no justifiable cause, most have been unable to get any of their money back even after long legal processes. In some cases the asset owner has been able to negotiate return of a small percentage.



            The frequency seems to be higher with local law enforcement, but also exists with state and federal. These cases are kept quiet and charges are rarely levied.






            share|improve this answer

























              3












              3








              3







              I would be very careful in the United States with cash, due to Asset Forfeiture.



              It's hard to say how high the risk or frequency, but there seem to be many incidents of this occurring. Of the cases I have followed where there is no justifiable cause, most have been unable to get any of their money back even after long legal processes. In some cases the asset owner has been able to negotiate return of a small percentage.



              The frequency seems to be higher with local law enforcement, but also exists with state and federal. These cases are kept quiet and charges are rarely levied.






              share|improve this answer













              I would be very careful in the United States with cash, due to Asset Forfeiture.



              It's hard to say how high the risk or frequency, but there seem to be many incidents of this occurring. Of the cases I have followed where there is no justifiable cause, most have been unable to get any of their money back even after long legal processes. In some cases the asset owner has been able to negotiate return of a small percentage.



              The frequency seems to be higher with local law enforcement, but also exists with state and federal. These cases are kept quiet and charges are rarely levied.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Aug 24 '16 at 22:29









              JohnJohn

              311




              311





















                  3














                  If this is useful, I've entered the USA twice with way more than $10,000 in traveler checks (but not in cash). The procedure is the following: you mark it on the Custom declaration, go to Customs, they check your declaration and send you to the secondary desk. There you are given a simple form, fill it up and give it to them. After that you're done. They didn't ask to see the traveler checks or count them, and generally looked completely uninterested and unexcited about the whole process.



                  No unusual questions were asked by the Customs, but my bank (where I deposited it), asked whether I declared it to the Customs. I said "yes" and they didn't have any further questions.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    3














                    If this is useful, I've entered the USA twice with way more than $10,000 in traveler checks (but not in cash). The procedure is the following: you mark it on the Custom declaration, go to Customs, they check your declaration and send you to the secondary desk. There you are given a simple form, fill it up and give it to them. After that you're done. They didn't ask to see the traveler checks or count them, and generally looked completely uninterested and unexcited about the whole process.



                    No unusual questions were asked by the Customs, but my bank (where I deposited it), asked whether I declared it to the Customs. I said "yes" and they didn't have any further questions.






                    share|improve this answer

























                      3












                      3








                      3







                      If this is useful, I've entered the USA twice with way more than $10,000 in traveler checks (but not in cash). The procedure is the following: you mark it on the Custom declaration, go to Customs, they check your declaration and send you to the secondary desk. There you are given a simple form, fill it up and give it to them. After that you're done. They didn't ask to see the traveler checks or count them, and generally looked completely uninterested and unexcited about the whole process.



                      No unusual questions were asked by the Customs, but my bank (where I deposited it), asked whether I declared it to the Customs. I said "yes" and they didn't have any further questions.






                      share|improve this answer













                      If this is useful, I've entered the USA twice with way more than $10,000 in traveler checks (but not in cash). The procedure is the following: you mark it on the Custom declaration, go to Customs, they check your declaration and send you to the secondary desk. There you are given a simple form, fill it up and give it to them. After that you're done. They didn't ask to see the traveler checks or count them, and generally looked completely uninterested and unexcited about the whole process.



                      No unusual questions were asked by the Customs, but my bank (where I deposited it), asked whether I declared it to the Customs. I said "yes" and they didn't have any further questions.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Dec 30 '17 at 19:18









                      George Y.George Y.

                      20.1k13480




                      20.1k13480





















                          2















                          WHO MUST FILE: (1) Each person who physically transports, mails, or
                          ships, or causes to be physically transported, mailed, or shipped
                          currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount
                          exceeding $10,000 at one time from the United States to any place
                          outside the United States or into the United States from any place
                          outside the United States, and



                          (2) Each person who receives in the
                          United States currency or other monetary instruments In an aggregate
                          amount exceeding $10,000 at one time which have been transported,
                          mailed, or shipped to the person from any place outside the United
                          States.




                          It looks like you both must file since the last word in the first paragraph is "and". While it is perfectly legal and can attract a lot of undesirable attention from the authorities such as the IRS or the department of homeland security. We did this once as a young white couple with three small children in tow and still got subjected to intense questioning.



                          First: I would NOT use cash because of risk of loss and high currency exchange fee. If you need a cash-like instrument, use travelers checks. These can be replaced if stolen and typically just have a 1% flat fee. They still are subject to declaration.



                          Electronic transfers are safer, cheaper, and easier on the paperwork. I use http://www.xe.com/xetrade/ to send money to kids abroad. Many banks these days have direct partnerships with other banks in different countries for mutual use of ATMs and low overhead transfer. For example Bank of America works with Deutsche Bank in Germany, Santander in Mexico, China Construction Bank, Westpac in Australia/NZ etc. I recommend talking to your local bank or finding a Bank in your country with ties to the US.






                          share|improve this answer


















                          • 1





                            I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?

                            – tubedogg
                            Apr 13 '16 at 3:53
















                          2















                          WHO MUST FILE: (1) Each person who physically transports, mails, or
                          ships, or causes to be physically transported, mailed, or shipped
                          currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount
                          exceeding $10,000 at one time from the United States to any place
                          outside the United States or into the United States from any place
                          outside the United States, and



                          (2) Each person who receives in the
                          United States currency or other monetary instruments In an aggregate
                          amount exceeding $10,000 at one time which have been transported,
                          mailed, or shipped to the person from any place outside the United
                          States.




                          It looks like you both must file since the last word in the first paragraph is "and". While it is perfectly legal and can attract a lot of undesirable attention from the authorities such as the IRS or the department of homeland security. We did this once as a young white couple with three small children in tow and still got subjected to intense questioning.



                          First: I would NOT use cash because of risk of loss and high currency exchange fee. If you need a cash-like instrument, use travelers checks. These can be replaced if stolen and typically just have a 1% flat fee. They still are subject to declaration.



                          Electronic transfers are safer, cheaper, and easier on the paperwork. I use http://www.xe.com/xetrade/ to send money to kids abroad. Many banks these days have direct partnerships with other banks in different countries for mutual use of ATMs and low overhead transfer. For example Bank of America works with Deutsche Bank in Germany, Santander in Mexico, China Construction Bank, Westpac in Australia/NZ etc. I recommend talking to your local bank or finding a Bank in your country with ties to the US.






                          share|improve this answer


















                          • 1





                            I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?

                            – tubedogg
                            Apr 13 '16 at 3:53














                          2












                          2








                          2








                          WHO MUST FILE: (1) Each person who physically transports, mails, or
                          ships, or causes to be physically transported, mailed, or shipped
                          currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount
                          exceeding $10,000 at one time from the United States to any place
                          outside the United States or into the United States from any place
                          outside the United States, and



                          (2) Each person who receives in the
                          United States currency or other monetary instruments In an aggregate
                          amount exceeding $10,000 at one time which have been transported,
                          mailed, or shipped to the person from any place outside the United
                          States.




                          It looks like you both must file since the last word in the first paragraph is "and". While it is perfectly legal and can attract a lot of undesirable attention from the authorities such as the IRS or the department of homeland security. We did this once as a young white couple with three small children in tow and still got subjected to intense questioning.



                          First: I would NOT use cash because of risk of loss and high currency exchange fee. If you need a cash-like instrument, use travelers checks. These can be replaced if stolen and typically just have a 1% flat fee. They still are subject to declaration.



                          Electronic transfers are safer, cheaper, and easier on the paperwork. I use http://www.xe.com/xetrade/ to send money to kids abroad. Many banks these days have direct partnerships with other banks in different countries for mutual use of ATMs and low overhead transfer. For example Bank of America works with Deutsche Bank in Germany, Santander in Mexico, China Construction Bank, Westpac in Australia/NZ etc. I recommend talking to your local bank or finding a Bank in your country with ties to the US.






                          share|improve this answer














                          WHO MUST FILE: (1) Each person who physically transports, mails, or
                          ships, or causes to be physically transported, mailed, or shipped
                          currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount
                          exceeding $10,000 at one time from the United States to any place
                          outside the United States or into the United States from any place
                          outside the United States, and



                          (2) Each person who receives in the
                          United States currency or other monetary instruments In an aggregate
                          amount exceeding $10,000 at one time which have been transported,
                          mailed, or shipped to the person from any place outside the United
                          States.




                          It looks like you both must file since the last word in the first paragraph is "and". While it is perfectly legal and can attract a lot of undesirable attention from the authorities such as the IRS or the department of homeland security. We did this once as a young white couple with three small children in tow and still got subjected to intense questioning.



                          First: I would NOT use cash because of risk of loss and high currency exchange fee. If you need a cash-like instrument, use travelers checks. These can be replaced if stolen and typically just have a 1% flat fee. They still are subject to declaration.



                          Electronic transfers are safer, cheaper, and easier on the paperwork. I use http://www.xe.com/xetrade/ to send money to kids abroad. Many banks these days have direct partnerships with other banks in different countries for mutual use of ATMs and low overhead transfer. For example Bank of America works with Deutsche Bank in Germany, Santander in Mexico, China Construction Bank, Westpac in Australia/NZ etc. I recommend talking to your local bank or finding a Bank in your country with ties to the US.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Apr 9 '16 at 18:55









                          HilmarHilmar

                          23.1k13774




                          23.1k13774







                          • 1





                            I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?

                            – tubedogg
                            Apr 13 '16 at 3:53













                          • 1





                            I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?

                            – tubedogg
                            Apr 13 '16 at 3:53








                          1




                          1





                          I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?

                          – tubedogg
                          Apr 13 '16 at 3:53






                          I agree with you regarding who must file - the instructions clearly indicate both the person physically transporting it and the recipient must file. The question, I believe, is whether two reports have to be filed based on the subsequent statement about an "additional report" being unnecessary if one was already filed for a "particular transportation" - does the filing for transport across the border suffice to cover the recipient receiving it too? Or are those two separate incidents under the regulations?

                          – tubedogg
                          Apr 13 '16 at 3:53












                          2














                          I am writing this because of "J Bergen"s poor answer. Bergen gives some bad advice.



                          1. You can bring as much currency into the country as you want, as long as you declare it. Otherwise, there will be penalties

                          2. NEVER STRUCTURE YOUR MONEY: i.e. bring in amounts under $10,000 multiple times. That's as bad as not declaring, and could see your visa revoked.

                          3. Western Union is not good

                          4. If you are unsure if the total amount of money (in any currency) you have anywhere (in your bags, pockets, shoe, etc) is equivalent to US$10,000 or more, DECLARE





                          share|improve this answer



























                            2














                            I am writing this because of "J Bergen"s poor answer. Bergen gives some bad advice.



                            1. You can bring as much currency into the country as you want, as long as you declare it. Otherwise, there will be penalties

                            2. NEVER STRUCTURE YOUR MONEY: i.e. bring in amounts under $10,000 multiple times. That's as bad as not declaring, and could see your visa revoked.

                            3. Western Union is not good

                            4. If you are unsure if the total amount of money (in any currency) you have anywhere (in your bags, pockets, shoe, etc) is equivalent to US$10,000 or more, DECLARE





                            share|improve this answer

























                              2












                              2








                              2







                              I am writing this because of "J Bergen"s poor answer. Bergen gives some bad advice.



                              1. You can bring as much currency into the country as you want, as long as you declare it. Otherwise, there will be penalties

                              2. NEVER STRUCTURE YOUR MONEY: i.e. bring in amounts under $10,000 multiple times. That's as bad as not declaring, and could see your visa revoked.

                              3. Western Union is not good

                              4. If you are unsure if the total amount of money (in any currency) you have anywhere (in your bags, pockets, shoe, etc) is equivalent to US$10,000 or more, DECLARE





                              share|improve this answer













                              I am writing this because of "J Bergen"s poor answer. Bergen gives some bad advice.



                              1. You can bring as much currency into the country as you want, as long as you declare it. Otherwise, there will be penalties

                              2. NEVER STRUCTURE YOUR MONEY: i.e. bring in amounts under $10,000 multiple times. That's as bad as not declaring, and could see your visa revoked.

                              3. Western Union is not good

                              4. If you are unsure if the total amount of money (in any currency) you have anywhere (in your bags, pockets, shoe, etc) is equivalent to US$10,000 or more, DECLARE






                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Feb 27 '18 at 22:17









                              Matthew BarclayMatthew Barclay

                              4381410




                              4381410





















                                  0














                                  The USA is a country with an effective, reliable banking system that does a good job serving consumers with virtually no graft or theft. As such, the only people who handle large quantities of cash are:



                                  • fools

                                  • criminals

                                  This may differ dramatically from your country. The US government is primarily concerned with the second, and cares less about the property rights of the first. "A fool and his money..."



                                  So it may be standard practice in your country to deal in cash, but in America it will get a frosty reception because of these prejudices. With an underlying assumption that more likely than not, it is in America's best interests to separate you from your money. There will be a mechanism by which you can appeal for its return, but this could cost a big chunk of $12,500 in lawyer costs.



                                  The way America expects you to do this is via the trusted, western banking system. For instance have your friend generate an invoice on PayPal for the goods or services, and pay them via PayPal. If for some reason you can't do conventional electronic transfers, you need to fix why that is.



                                  Bringing in cash because electronic transfers don't work is just the kind of thing they're on guard for. Customs will know the reasons your wire transfers were disallowed, and will be wary of cash moving on the same route. Effectively you're circumventing the normal way of doing this.



                                  That isn't structuring, but they have a lot in common.



                                  The upshot is that bringing large blocks of cash is a fool's game, and you should expect problems.






                                  share|improve this answer





























                                    0














                                    The USA is a country with an effective, reliable banking system that does a good job serving consumers with virtually no graft or theft. As such, the only people who handle large quantities of cash are:



                                    • fools

                                    • criminals

                                    This may differ dramatically from your country. The US government is primarily concerned with the second, and cares less about the property rights of the first. "A fool and his money..."



                                    So it may be standard practice in your country to deal in cash, but in America it will get a frosty reception because of these prejudices. With an underlying assumption that more likely than not, it is in America's best interests to separate you from your money. There will be a mechanism by which you can appeal for its return, but this could cost a big chunk of $12,500 in lawyer costs.



                                    The way America expects you to do this is via the trusted, western banking system. For instance have your friend generate an invoice on PayPal for the goods or services, and pay them via PayPal. If for some reason you can't do conventional electronic transfers, you need to fix why that is.



                                    Bringing in cash because electronic transfers don't work is just the kind of thing they're on guard for. Customs will know the reasons your wire transfers were disallowed, and will be wary of cash moving on the same route. Effectively you're circumventing the normal way of doing this.



                                    That isn't structuring, but they have a lot in common.



                                    The upshot is that bringing large blocks of cash is a fool's game, and you should expect problems.






                                    share|improve this answer



























                                      0












                                      0








                                      0







                                      The USA is a country with an effective, reliable banking system that does a good job serving consumers with virtually no graft or theft. As such, the only people who handle large quantities of cash are:



                                      • fools

                                      • criminals

                                      This may differ dramatically from your country. The US government is primarily concerned with the second, and cares less about the property rights of the first. "A fool and his money..."



                                      So it may be standard practice in your country to deal in cash, but in America it will get a frosty reception because of these prejudices. With an underlying assumption that more likely than not, it is in America's best interests to separate you from your money. There will be a mechanism by which you can appeal for its return, but this could cost a big chunk of $12,500 in lawyer costs.



                                      The way America expects you to do this is via the trusted, western banking system. For instance have your friend generate an invoice on PayPal for the goods or services, and pay them via PayPal. If for some reason you can't do conventional electronic transfers, you need to fix why that is.



                                      Bringing in cash because electronic transfers don't work is just the kind of thing they're on guard for. Customs will know the reasons your wire transfers were disallowed, and will be wary of cash moving on the same route. Effectively you're circumventing the normal way of doing this.



                                      That isn't structuring, but they have a lot in common.



                                      The upshot is that bringing large blocks of cash is a fool's game, and you should expect problems.






                                      share|improve this answer















                                      The USA is a country with an effective, reliable banking system that does a good job serving consumers with virtually no graft or theft. As such, the only people who handle large quantities of cash are:



                                      • fools

                                      • criminals

                                      This may differ dramatically from your country. The US government is primarily concerned with the second, and cares less about the property rights of the first. "A fool and his money..."



                                      So it may be standard practice in your country to deal in cash, but in America it will get a frosty reception because of these prejudices. With an underlying assumption that more likely than not, it is in America's best interests to separate you from your money. There will be a mechanism by which you can appeal for its return, but this could cost a big chunk of $12,500 in lawyer costs.



                                      The way America expects you to do this is via the trusted, western banking system. For instance have your friend generate an invoice on PayPal for the goods or services, and pay them via PayPal. If for some reason you can't do conventional electronic transfers, you need to fix why that is.



                                      Bringing in cash because electronic transfers don't work is just the kind of thing they're on guard for. Customs will know the reasons your wire transfers were disallowed, and will be wary of cash moving on the same route. Effectively you're circumventing the normal way of doing this.



                                      That isn't structuring, but they have a lot in common.



                                      The upshot is that bringing large blocks of cash is a fool's game, and you should expect problems.







                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Jan 26 at 17:36

























                                      answered Jan 26 at 17:31









                                      HarperHarper

                                      12.5k32361




                                      12.5k32361





















                                          -4














                                          Don't do it! Also check how much the Country you are going to allows you to come in with! It is a scam in many places. America allows you $10,000 do not be a penney over that amount even in change or they will steal it from you! Or tie you up so you miss your flight. Some Countries do to exchange rate allow a little less than that. So on arrival they will steal it from you! As you are over there amount to bring in. 3rd world Countries are good for this scam! Set up a Western Union acount & wire yourself the money to were ever. If they have Western Union there. Then bring in $6,000 at a time on 2 transfers.






                                          share|improve this answer


















                                          • 2





                                            You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good

                                            – Matthew Barclay
                                            Feb 27 '18 at 22:12
















                                          -4














                                          Don't do it! Also check how much the Country you are going to allows you to come in with! It is a scam in many places. America allows you $10,000 do not be a penney over that amount even in change or they will steal it from you! Or tie you up so you miss your flight. Some Countries do to exchange rate allow a little less than that. So on arrival they will steal it from you! As you are over there amount to bring in. 3rd world Countries are good for this scam! Set up a Western Union acount & wire yourself the money to were ever. If they have Western Union there. Then bring in $6,000 at a time on 2 transfers.






                                          share|improve this answer


















                                          • 2





                                            You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good

                                            – Matthew Barclay
                                            Feb 27 '18 at 22:12














                                          -4












                                          -4








                                          -4







                                          Don't do it! Also check how much the Country you are going to allows you to come in with! It is a scam in many places. America allows you $10,000 do not be a penney over that amount even in change or they will steal it from you! Or tie you up so you miss your flight. Some Countries do to exchange rate allow a little less than that. So on arrival they will steal it from you! As you are over there amount to bring in. 3rd world Countries are good for this scam! Set up a Western Union acount & wire yourself the money to were ever. If they have Western Union there. Then bring in $6,000 at a time on 2 transfers.






                                          share|improve this answer













                                          Don't do it! Also check how much the Country you are going to allows you to come in with! It is a scam in many places. America allows you $10,000 do not be a penney over that amount even in change or they will steal it from you! Or tie you up so you miss your flight. Some Countries do to exchange rate allow a little less than that. So on arrival they will steal it from you! As you are over there amount to bring in. 3rd world Countries are good for this scam! Set up a Western Union acount & wire yourself the money to were ever. If they have Western Union there. Then bring in $6,000 at a time on 2 transfers.







                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered Dec 30 '17 at 21:31









                                          J BergenJ Bergen

                                          25313




                                          25313







                                          • 2





                                            You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good

                                            – Matthew Barclay
                                            Feb 27 '18 at 22:12













                                          • 2





                                            You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good

                                            – Matthew Barclay
                                            Feb 27 '18 at 22:12








                                          2




                                          2





                                          You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good

                                          – Matthew Barclay
                                          Feb 27 '18 at 22:12






                                          You can bring as much money into the US as you want, you just have to declare it. If you don't declare it, you get penalized, with a penalty of from $250 to complete forfeiture, depending on whether you have documentation for the money or not. If you declare it, they have you sign a form, and you're good

                                          – Matthew Barclay
                                          Feb 27 '18 at 22:12


















                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66328%2fusa-travelling-with-more-than-usd-10-000%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

                                          Crossroads (UK TV series)

                                          ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế