Is there a real King (or Queen) of the Sugar Rush Kingdom?
In Wreck-it Ralph, Vanellope is confirmed to be the Princess of Sugar Rush. This would imply that she’s either the daughter of a King and/or Queen or that she, as supreme ruler of the Kingdom should be the Queen.
It occurred to me that the Kingdom might actually be a principality (albeit one ruled by a princess) but is there anything that explains her status?
wreck-it-ralph
edited Aug 24 at 19:26
Valorum
394k10228593093
asked Aug 24 at 17:41
Alex Downs
1,102624
|
show 7 more comments
In Wreck-it Ralph, Vanellope is confirmed to be the Princess of Sugar Rush. This would imply that she’s either the daughter of a King and/or Queen or that she, as supreme ruler of the Kingdom should be the Queen.
It occurred to me that the Kingdom might actually be a principality (albeit one ruled by a princess) but is there anything that explains her status?
wreck-it-ralph
edited Aug 24 at 19:26
Valorum
394k10228593093
asked Aug 24 at 17:41
Alex Downs
1,102624
1
Are you asking if there's any in-universe evidence that this is a Principality as per en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality?
– FuzzyBoots
Aug 24 at 17:44
2
This seems to be attracting downvotes because it starts with an unfounded assumption. I've done a big edit to try to make it less guess-work-y and more focused.
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 19:27
1
Thanks @Valorum, that seems to make the question better. Hopefully it will stem the tide of downvotes (or that new downvoters would comment on how this question can be further improved).
– Thunderforge
Aug 24 at 19:36
2
@Thunderforge - There's still a confusing number of close votes being cast. I suspect that there's a bit of less-than-careful reviewing going on here
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 20:16
1
@Thunderforge - Quick edit and the votes come rolling in. SE loves an on-topic question.
– Valorum
Aug 25 at 7:29
|
show 7 more comments
In Wreck-it Ralph, Vanellope is confirmed to be the Princess of Sugar Rush. This would imply that she’s either the daughter of a King and/or Queen or that she, as supreme ruler of the Kingdom should be the Queen.
It occurred to me that the Kingdom might actually be a principality (albeit one ruled by a princess) but is there anything that explains her status?
wreck-it-ralph
edited Aug 24 at 19:26
Valorum
394k10228593093
asked Aug 24 at 17:41
Alex Downs
1,102624
In Wreck-it Ralph, Vanellope is confirmed to be the Princess of Sugar Rush. This would imply that she’s either the daughter of a King and/or Queen or that she, as supreme ruler of the Kingdom should be the Queen.
It occurred to me that the Kingdom might actually be a principality (albeit one ruled by a princess) but is there anything that explains her status?
wreck-it-ralph
wreck-it-ralph
edited Aug 24 at 19:26
Valorum
394k10228593093
asked Aug 24 at 17:41
Alex Downs
1,102624
edited Aug 24 at 19:26
Valorum
394k10228593093
asked Aug 24 at 17:41
Alex Downs
1,102624
edited Aug 24 at 19:26
Valorum
394k10228593093
edited Aug 24 at 19:26
Valorum
394k10228593093
edited Aug 24 at 19:26
Valorum
394k10228593093
394k10228593093
asked Aug 24 at 17:41
Alex Downs
1,102624
asked Aug 24 at 17:41
Alex Downs
1,102624
asked Aug 24 at 17:41
Alex Downs
1,102624
1,102624
1
Are you asking if there's any in-universe evidence that this is a Principality as per en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality?
– FuzzyBoots
Aug 24 at 17:44
2
This seems to be attracting downvotes because it starts with an unfounded assumption. I've done a big edit to try to make it less guess-work-y and more focused.
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 19:27
1
Thanks @Valorum, that seems to make the question better. Hopefully it will stem the tide of downvotes (or that new downvoters would comment on how this question can be further improved).
– Thunderforge
Aug 24 at 19:36
2
@Thunderforge - There's still a confusing number of close votes being cast. I suspect that there's a bit of less-than-careful reviewing going on here
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 20:16
1
@Thunderforge - Quick edit and the votes come rolling in. SE loves an on-topic question.
– Valorum
Aug 25 at 7:29
|
show 7 more comments
1
Are you asking if there's any in-universe evidence that this is a Principality as per en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality?
– FuzzyBoots
Aug 24 at 17:44
2
This seems to be attracting downvotes because it starts with an unfounded assumption. I've done a big edit to try to make it less guess-work-y and more focused.
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 19:27
1
Thanks @Valorum, that seems to make the question better. Hopefully it will stem the tide of downvotes (or that new downvoters would comment on how this question can be further improved).
– Thunderforge
Aug 24 at 19:36
2
@Thunderforge - There's still a confusing number of close votes being cast. I suspect that there's a bit of less-than-careful reviewing going on here
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 20:16
1
@Thunderforge - Quick edit and the votes come rolling in. SE loves an on-topic question.
– Valorum
Aug 25 at 7:29
1
1
Are you asking if there's any in-universe evidence that this is a Principality as per en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality?
– FuzzyBoots
Aug 24 at 17:44
Are you asking if there's any in-universe evidence that this is a Principality as per en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality?
– FuzzyBoots
Aug 24 at 17:44
2
2
This seems to be attracting downvotes because it starts with an unfounded assumption. I've done a big edit to try to make it less guess-work-y and more focused.
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 19:27
This seems to be attracting downvotes because it starts with an unfounded assumption. I've done a big edit to try to make it less guess-work-y and more focused.
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 19:27
1
1
Thanks @Valorum, that seems to make the question better. Hopefully it will stem the tide of downvotes (or that new downvoters would comment on how this question can be further improved).
– Thunderforge
Aug 24 at 19:36
Thanks @Valorum, that seems to make the question better. Hopefully it will stem the tide of downvotes (or that new downvoters would comment on how this question can be further improved).
– Thunderforge
Aug 24 at 19:36
2
2
@Thunderforge - There's still a confusing number of close votes being cast. I suspect that there's a bit of less-than-careful reviewing going on here
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 20:16
@Thunderforge - There's still a confusing number of close votes being cast. I suspect that there's a bit of less-than-careful reviewing going on here
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 20:16
1
1
@Thunderforge - Quick edit and the votes come rolling in. SE loves an on-topic question.
– Valorum
Aug 25 at 7:29
@Thunderforge - Quick edit and the votes come rolling in. SE loves an on-topic question.
– Valorum
Aug 25 at 7:29
|
show 7 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The very short answer is that world of Sugar Rush isn't a fully formed society that has grown and evolved over time. It's basically a snapshot of a community that was created by its in-universe writers as the setting for a series of races that take place within a small (and ill-defined) society presided over by a Princess. In short, there never was a real King Candy since the society was birthed, fully-formed with Princess Vanellope as its absolute ruler.
Q. Was King Candy an existing character in the game, or did Turbo create him from scratch?
Raymond S. Persi: Good question. I think King Candy didn’t exist before Turbo got there. That’s why Vanellope was on the side and the ruler of the world.
and
Q. is that answer regarding King Candy 100% canon or just your own personal theory?
Raymond S. Persi: That’s what we were going for. Turbo snuck into Sugar Rush, created a new persona in the form of King Candy and reprogrammed everyone to think he had always been around.
answered Aug 24 at 17:52
Valorum
394k10228593093
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193493%2fis-there-a-real-king-or-queen-of-the-sugar-rush-kingdom%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The very short answer is that world of Sugar Rush isn't a fully formed society that has grown and evolved over time. It's basically a snapshot of a community that was created by its in-universe writers as the setting for a series of races that take place within a small (and ill-defined) society presided over by a Princess. In short, there never was a real King Candy since the society was birthed, fully-formed with Princess Vanellope as its absolute ruler.
Q. Was King Candy an existing character in the game, or did Turbo create him from scratch?
Raymond S. Persi: Good question. I think King Candy didn’t exist before Turbo got there. That’s why Vanellope was on the side and the ruler of the world.
and
Q. is that answer regarding King Candy 100% canon or just your own personal theory?
Raymond S. Persi: That’s what we were going for. Turbo snuck into Sugar Rush, created a new persona in the form of King Candy and reprogrammed everyone to think he had always been around.
answered Aug 24 at 17:52
Valorum
394k10228593093
add a comment |
The very short answer is that world of Sugar Rush isn't a fully formed society that has grown and evolved over time. It's basically a snapshot of a community that was created by its in-universe writers as the setting for a series of races that take place within a small (and ill-defined) society presided over by a Princess. In short, there never was a real King Candy since the society was birthed, fully-formed with Princess Vanellope as its absolute ruler.
Q. Was King Candy an existing character in the game, or did Turbo create him from scratch?
Raymond S. Persi: Good question. I think King Candy didn’t exist before Turbo got there. That’s why Vanellope was on the side and the ruler of the world.
and
Q. is that answer regarding King Candy 100% canon or just your own personal theory?
Raymond S. Persi: That’s what we were going for. Turbo snuck into Sugar Rush, created a new persona in the form of King Candy and reprogrammed everyone to think he had always been around.
answered Aug 24 at 17:52
Valorum
394k10228593093
add a comment |
The very short answer is that world of Sugar Rush isn't a fully formed society that has grown and evolved over time. It's basically a snapshot of a community that was created by its in-universe writers as the setting for a series of races that take place within a small (and ill-defined) society presided over by a Princess. In short, there never was a real King Candy since the society was birthed, fully-formed with Princess Vanellope as its absolute ruler.
Q. Was King Candy an existing character in the game, or did Turbo create him from scratch?
Raymond S. Persi: Good question. I think King Candy didn’t exist before Turbo got there. That’s why Vanellope was on the side and the ruler of the world.
and
Q. is that answer regarding King Candy 100% canon or just your own personal theory?
Raymond S. Persi: That’s what we were going for. Turbo snuck into Sugar Rush, created a new persona in the form of King Candy and reprogrammed everyone to think he had always been around.
answered Aug 24 at 17:52
Valorum
394k10228593093
The very short answer is that world of Sugar Rush isn't a fully formed society that has grown and evolved over time. It's basically a snapshot of a community that was created by its in-universe writers as the setting for a series of races that take place within a small (and ill-defined) society presided over by a Princess. In short, there never was a real King Candy since the society was birthed, fully-formed with Princess Vanellope as its absolute ruler.
Q. Was King Candy an existing character in the game, or did Turbo create him from scratch?
Raymond S. Persi: Good question. I think King Candy didn’t exist before Turbo got there. That’s why Vanellope was on the side and the ruler of the world.
and
Q. is that answer regarding King Candy 100% canon or just your own personal theory?
Raymond S. Persi: That’s what we were going for. Turbo snuck into Sugar Rush, created a new persona in the form of King Candy and reprogrammed everyone to think he had always been around.
answered Aug 24 at 17:52
Valorum
394k10228593093
edited Aug 25 at 13:24
answered Aug 24 at 17:52
Valorum
394k10228593093
answered Aug 24 at 17:52
Valorum
394k10228593093
answered Aug 24 at 17:52
Valorum
394k10228593093
394k10228593093
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193493%2fis-there-a-real-king-or-queen-of-the-sugar-rush-kingdom%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Are you asking if there's any in-universe evidence that this is a Principality as per en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality?
– FuzzyBoots
Aug 24 at 17:44
2
This seems to be attracting downvotes because it starts with an unfounded assumption. I've done a big edit to try to make it less guess-work-y and more focused.
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 19:27
1
Thanks @Valorum, that seems to make the question better. Hopefully it will stem the tide of downvotes (or that new downvoters would comment on how this question can be further improved).
– Thunderforge
Aug 24 at 19:36
2
@Thunderforge - There's still a confusing number of close votes being cast. I suspect that there's a bit of less-than-careful reviewing going on here
– Valorum
Aug 24 at 20:16
1
@Thunderforge - Quick edit and the votes come rolling in. SE loves an on-topic question.
– Valorum
Aug 25 at 7:29