Lightning component limitaion
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Just wondering -- How many records can be shown on a lightning component without doing the pagination. Do Components have the limitaions just like that of VF pages?
lightning-aura-components governorlimits
add a comment |
Just wondering -- How many records can be shown on a lightning component without doing the pagination. Do Components have the limitaions just like that of VF pages?
lightning-aura-components governorlimits
add a comment |
Just wondering -- How many records can be shown on a lightning component without doing the pagination. Do Components have the limitaions just like that of VF pages?
lightning-aura-components governorlimits
Just wondering -- How many records can be shown on a lightning component without doing the pagination. Do Components have the limitaions just like that of VF pages?
lightning-aura-components governorlimits
lightning-aura-components governorlimits
asked Aug 29 '18 at 10:42
Vee_forceVee_force
335
335
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There's no hard limit built in to aura:iteration, as there was with the Visualforce iterators. The actual limits will be based on exactly what you're trying to do. For example, SOQL from the server-side is limited to 50,000 rows, so that might be practical limitation in the sense that you'll have to at least paginate the queries.
At some point, rendering will take so long that your browser will crash from lack of memory, scripts taking too long to run, etc. On my computer, a single column table was able to support about 50,000 rows before the rendering time started affecting my system.
Should you decide to do this, remember to test your code on mobile devices to make sure it can actually render the page. Infinite scrolling and pagination are recommended for client-performance reasons, which you should take in to consideration.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f230486%2flightning-component-limitaion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There's no hard limit built in to aura:iteration, as there was with the Visualforce iterators. The actual limits will be based on exactly what you're trying to do. For example, SOQL from the server-side is limited to 50,000 rows, so that might be practical limitation in the sense that you'll have to at least paginate the queries.
At some point, rendering will take so long that your browser will crash from lack of memory, scripts taking too long to run, etc. On my computer, a single column table was able to support about 50,000 rows before the rendering time started affecting my system.
Should you decide to do this, remember to test your code on mobile devices to make sure it can actually render the page. Infinite scrolling and pagination are recommended for client-performance reasons, which you should take in to consideration.
add a comment |
There's no hard limit built in to aura:iteration, as there was with the Visualforce iterators. The actual limits will be based on exactly what you're trying to do. For example, SOQL from the server-side is limited to 50,000 rows, so that might be practical limitation in the sense that you'll have to at least paginate the queries.
At some point, rendering will take so long that your browser will crash from lack of memory, scripts taking too long to run, etc. On my computer, a single column table was able to support about 50,000 rows before the rendering time started affecting my system.
Should you decide to do this, remember to test your code on mobile devices to make sure it can actually render the page. Infinite scrolling and pagination are recommended for client-performance reasons, which you should take in to consideration.
add a comment |
There's no hard limit built in to aura:iteration, as there was with the Visualforce iterators. The actual limits will be based on exactly what you're trying to do. For example, SOQL from the server-side is limited to 50,000 rows, so that might be practical limitation in the sense that you'll have to at least paginate the queries.
At some point, rendering will take so long that your browser will crash from lack of memory, scripts taking too long to run, etc. On my computer, a single column table was able to support about 50,000 rows before the rendering time started affecting my system.
Should you decide to do this, remember to test your code on mobile devices to make sure it can actually render the page. Infinite scrolling and pagination are recommended for client-performance reasons, which you should take in to consideration.
There's no hard limit built in to aura:iteration, as there was with the Visualforce iterators. The actual limits will be based on exactly what you're trying to do. For example, SOQL from the server-side is limited to 50,000 rows, so that might be practical limitation in the sense that you'll have to at least paginate the queries.
At some point, rendering will take so long that your browser will crash from lack of memory, scripts taking too long to run, etc. On my computer, a single column table was able to support about 50,000 rows before the rendering time started affecting my system.
Should you decide to do this, remember to test your code on mobile devices to make sure it can actually render the page. Infinite scrolling and pagination are recommended for client-performance reasons, which you should take in to consideration.
answered Aug 29 '18 at 11:01
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
266k13212459
266k13212459
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f230486%2flightning-component-limitaion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown

