How is possible that those shapes are equivalent in topology?










24












$begingroup$


I recently started to study topology, I have no idea about the subject so my question could be very simple but I need a clear explanation. It is about the page number 19 of Introducton to Topology by Colin Adams and Robert Franzosa; it said that the shapes:



donut



sphere with two holes



are equivalent in topology, but one has just one hole and the other has two. is possible to add holes or stick holes?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    Aug 26 '18 at 1:27






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Aug 26 '18 at 3:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom
    Aug 27 '18 at 9:50















24












$begingroup$


I recently started to study topology, I have no idea about the subject so my question could be very simple but I need a clear explanation. It is about the page number 19 of Introducton to Topology by Colin Adams and Robert Franzosa; it said that the shapes:



donut



sphere with two holes



are equivalent in topology, but one has just one hole and the other has two. is possible to add holes or stick holes?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    Aug 26 '18 at 1:27






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Aug 26 '18 at 3:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom
    Aug 27 '18 at 9:50













24












24








24


4



$begingroup$


I recently started to study topology, I have no idea about the subject so my question could be very simple but I need a clear explanation. It is about the page number 19 of Introducton to Topology by Colin Adams and Robert Franzosa; it said that the shapes:



donut



sphere with two holes



are equivalent in topology, but one has just one hole and the other has two. is possible to add holes or stick holes?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I recently started to study topology, I have no idea about the subject so my question could be very simple but I need a clear explanation. It is about the page number 19 of Introducton to Topology by Colin Adams and Robert Franzosa; it said that the shapes:



donut



sphere with two holes



are equivalent in topology, but one has just one hole and the other has two. is possible to add holes or stick holes?







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 25 '18 at 19:05









Micah

29.8k1364106




29.8k1364106










asked Aug 25 '18 at 19:00









José MarínJosé Marín

13417




13417







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    Aug 26 '18 at 1:27






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Aug 26 '18 at 3:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom
    Aug 27 '18 at 9:50












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    Aug 26 '18 at 1:27






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Aug 26 '18 at 3:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom
    Aug 27 '18 at 9:50







1




1




$begingroup$
Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
Aug 26 '18 at 1:27




$begingroup$
Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
Aug 26 '18 at 1:27




4




4




$begingroup$
It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Aug 26 '18 at 3:31




$begingroup$
It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Aug 26 '18 at 3:31




1




1




$begingroup$
The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
$endgroup$
– Tom
Aug 27 '18 at 9:50




$begingroup$
The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
$endgroup$
– Tom
Aug 27 '18 at 9:50










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















53












$begingroup$

Look a bit more closely at the second picture. There's a couple of little dotted lines connecting the two holes that may be a bit hard to see.



(left pic is from post, right pic is super contrast enhanced to tease out line)



That is meant to convey the impression they are the two ends of a single, long, curved hole through the interior.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 29




    $begingroup$
    I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
    $endgroup$
    – Lamar Latrell
    Aug 26 '18 at 4:39


















39












$begingroup$

The "two holes" in that sphere are two ends of the same hole. (That is, if you drilled one hole all the way through a sphere, you would end up with something that looked very much like your picture.)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
    $endgroup$
    – Antoni Parellada
    Aug 25 '18 at 19:07






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Fogmeister
    Aug 26 '18 at 6:47


















19












$begingroup$

You may also notice the tunel, which I agree with you it is not clear in this photo.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas Blass
    Aug 25 '18 at 20:28











  • $begingroup$
    @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
    $endgroup$
    – dmtri
    Aug 26 '18 at 6:10


















5












$begingroup$

enter image description here
The cuboid and the sphere are topological euvivalent. Drill a hole through each body as indicated by the arrow. The resulting bodies are still topological equivalent.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2894411%2fhow-is-possible-that-those-shapes-are-equivalent-in-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    53












    $begingroup$

    Look a bit more closely at the second picture. There's a couple of little dotted lines connecting the two holes that may be a bit hard to see.



    (left pic is from post, right pic is super contrast enhanced to tease out line)



    That is meant to convey the impression they are the two ends of a single, long, curved hole through the interior.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 29




      $begingroup$
      I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
      $endgroup$
      – Lamar Latrell
      Aug 26 '18 at 4:39















    53












    $begingroup$

    Look a bit more closely at the second picture. There's a couple of little dotted lines connecting the two holes that may be a bit hard to see.



    (left pic is from post, right pic is super contrast enhanced to tease out line)



    That is meant to convey the impression they are the two ends of a single, long, curved hole through the interior.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 29




      $begingroup$
      I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
      $endgroup$
      – Lamar Latrell
      Aug 26 '18 at 4:39













    53












    53








    53





    $begingroup$

    Look a bit more closely at the second picture. There's a couple of little dotted lines connecting the two holes that may be a bit hard to see.



    (left pic is from post, right pic is super contrast enhanced to tease out line)



    That is meant to convey the impression they are the two ends of a single, long, curved hole through the interior.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Look a bit more closely at the second picture. There's a couple of little dotted lines connecting the two holes that may be a bit hard to see.



    (left pic is from post, right pic is super contrast enhanced to tease out line)



    That is meant to convey the impression they are the two ends of a single, long, curved hole through the interior.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Aug 26 '18 at 0:34









    The_SympathizerThe_Sympathizer

    7,4852245




    7,4852245







    • 29




      $begingroup$
      I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
      $endgroup$
      – Lamar Latrell
      Aug 26 '18 at 4:39












    • 29




      $begingroup$
      I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
      $endgroup$
      – Lamar Latrell
      Aug 26 '18 at 4:39







    29




    29




    $begingroup$
    I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
    $endgroup$
    – Lamar Latrell
    Aug 26 '18 at 4:39




    $begingroup$
    I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
    $endgroup$
    – Lamar Latrell
    Aug 26 '18 at 4:39











    39












    $begingroup$

    The "two holes" in that sphere are two ends of the same hole. (That is, if you drilled one hole all the way through a sphere, you would end up with something that looked very much like your picture.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
      $endgroup$
      – Antoni Parellada
      Aug 25 '18 at 19:07






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
      $endgroup$
      – Fogmeister
      Aug 26 '18 at 6:47















    39












    $begingroup$

    The "two holes" in that sphere are two ends of the same hole. (That is, if you drilled one hole all the way through a sphere, you would end up with something that looked very much like your picture.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
      $endgroup$
      – Antoni Parellada
      Aug 25 '18 at 19:07






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
      $endgroup$
      – Fogmeister
      Aug 26 '18 at 6:47













    39












    39








    39





    $begingroup$

    The "two holes" in that sphere are two ends of the same hole. (That is, if you drilled one hole all the way through a sphere, you would end up with something that looked very much like your picture.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The "two holes" in that sphere are two ends of the same hole. (That is, if you drilled one hole all the way through a sphere, you would end up with something that looked very much like your picture.)







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Aug 25 '18 at 19:04









    MicahMicah

    29.8k1364106




    29.8k1364106







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
      $endgroup$
      – Antoni Parellada
      Aug 25 '18 at 19:07






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
      $endgroup$
      – Fogmeister
      Aug 26 '18 at 6:47












    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
      $endgroup$
      – Antoni Parellada
      Aug 25 '18 at 19:07






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
      $endgroup$
      – Fogmeister
      Aug 26 '18 at 6:47







    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
    $endgroup$
    – Antoni Parellada
    Aug 25 '18 at 19:07




    $begingroup$
    Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
    $endgroup$
    – Antoni Parellada
    Aug 25 '18 at 19:07




    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Fogmeister
    Aug 26 '18 at 6:47




    $begingroup$
    It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Fogmeister
    Aug 26 '18 at 6:47











    19












    $begingroup$

    You may also notice the tunel, which I agree with you it is not clear in this photo.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 7




      $begingroup$
      I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
      $endgroup$
      – Andreas Blass
      Aug 25 '18 at 20:28











    • $begingroup$
      @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
      $endgroup$
      – dmtri
      Aug 26 '18 at 6:10















    19












    $begingroup$

    You may also notice the tunel, which I agree with you it is not clear in this photo.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 7




      $begingroup$
      I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
      $endgroup$
      – Andreas Blass
      Aug 25 '18 at 20:28











    • $begingroup$
      @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
      $endgroup$
      – dmtri
      Aug 26 '18 at 6:10













    19












    19








    19





    $begingroup$

    You may also notice the tunel, which I agree with you it is not clear in this photo.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    You may also notice the tunel, which I agree with you it is not clear in this photo.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Aug 25 '18 at 19:10









    dmtridmtri

    1,4522521




    1,4522521







    • 7




      $begingroup$
      I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
      $endgroup$
      – Andreas Blass
      Aug 25 '18 at 20:28











    • $begingroup$
      @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
      $endgroup$
      – dmtri
      Aug 26 '18 at 6:10












    • 7




      $begingroup$
      I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
      $endgroup$
      – Andreas Blass
      Aug 25 '18 at 20:28











    • $begingroup$
      @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
      $endgroup$
      – dmtri
      Aug 26 '18 at 6:10







    7




    7




    $begingroup$
    I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas Blass
    Aug 25 '18 at 20:28





    $begingroup$
    I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas Blass
    Aug 25 '18 at 20:28













    $begingroup$
    @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
    $endgroup$
    – dmtri
    Aug 26 '18 at 6:10




    $begingroup$
    @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
    $endgroup$
    – dmtri
    Aug 26 '18 at 6:10











    5












    $begingroup$

    enter image description here
    The cuboid and the sphere are topological euvivalent. Drill a hole through each body as indicated by the arrow. The resulting bodies are still topological equivalent.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      5












      $begingroup$

      enter image description here
      The cuboid and the sphere are topological euvivalent. Drill a hole through each body as indicated by the arrow. The resulting bodies are still topological equivalent.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        enter image description here
        The cuboid and the sphere are topological euvivalent. Drill a hole through each body as indicated by the arrow. The resulting bodies are still topological equivalent.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        enter image description here
        The cuboid and the sphere are topological euvivalent. Drill a hole through each body as indicated by the arrow. The resulting bodies are still topological equivalent.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 25 '18 at 20:06









        miracle173miracle173

        7,33322247




        7,33322247



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2894411%2fhow-is-possible-that-those-shapes-are-equivalent-in-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            ャフサォクコ ケウ,コ,ワ メ,ロスョノ゙,クネ,フムカヤヲニ,エコ゚ツ ウイオン゙ケワサネォキモュキォウイノンコチ゚メヌナイゥフュ,カヒウネェ ネ,ホノケ,ムュキ ッボーミュハ,チ ツス ィ メウイマヤ,゙ウチ ヅ ロ,ォジヌェ ャヌット ェ,マャ,チナエヒネソキツテ トホヲヲミーァ

            Node.js puppeteer - Use values from array in a loop to cycle through pages