Rotate matrix without []
I need to rotate a matrix and call the funcion without using ,
I can't even think on a solution.
void _90DegClockwise(int *pS, int row, int col)
for (int i = 0; i < row; ++i)
for (int j = i + 1; j < col; j++)
int temp;
temp = (int)(pS);
*((int*)((pS + i) + j)) = (int*)((pS + j) + i);
(int*)((pS + j) + i) = temp;
I don't know how to insert a value to matrix or how to swap
c arrays pointers
add a comment |
I need to rotate a matrix and call the funcion without using ,
I can't even think on a solution.
void _90DegClockwise(int *pS, int row, int col)
for (int i = 0; i < row; ++i)
for (int j = i + 1; j < col; j++)
int temp;
temp = (int)(pS);
*((int*)((pS + i) + j)) = (int*)((pS + j) + i);
(int*)((pS + j) + i) = temp;
I don't know how to insert a value to matrix or how to swap
c arrays pointers
how is matrix rotation related to?
– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 12:39
I can't swap elements by using: a[i][j] = temp ,etc.
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 12:46
add a comment |
I need to rotate a matrix and call the funcion without using ,
I can't even think on a solution.
void _90DegClockwise(int *pS, int row, int col)
for (int i = 0; i < row; ++i)
for (int j = i + 1; j < col; j++)
int temp;
temp = (int)(pS);
*((int*)((pS + i) + j)) = (int*)((pS + j) + i);
(int*)((pS + j) + i) = temp;
I don't know how to insert a value to matrix or how to swap
c arrays pointers
I need to rotate a matrix and call the funcion without using ,
I can't even think on a solution.
void _90DegClockwise(int *pS, int row, int col)
for (int i = 0; i < row; ++i)
for (int j = i + 1; j < col; j++)
int temp;
temp = (int)(pS);
*((int*)((pS + i) + j)) = (int*)((pS + j) + i);
(int*)((pS + j) + i) = temp;
I don't know how to insert a value to matrix or how to swap
c arrays pointers
c arrays pointers
edited Nov 10 '18 at 22:54
phuclv
14.5k852216
14.5k852216
asked Nov 10 '18 at 11:39
Itay ZemahItay Zemah
83
83
how is matrix rotation related to?
– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 12:39
I can't swap elements by using: a[i][j] = temp ,etc.
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 12:46
add a comment |
how is matrix rotation related to?
– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 12:39
I can't swap elements by using: a[i][j] = temp ,etc.
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 12:46
how is matrix rotation related to
?– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 12:39
how is matrix rotation related to
?– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 12:39
I can't swap elements by using: a[i][j] = temp ,etc.
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 12:46
I can't swap elements by using: a[i][j] = temp ,etc.
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 12:46
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You're mixing up the pointer and the dereferenced value in the 3 lines
In the first line temp = (int)(pS);
you're assigning the pointer value to temp instead of the value that the pointer points to. Similarly you're also assigning the pointer value to the memory location like this *((int*)((pS + i) + j)) = (int*)((pS + j) + i);
which makes no sense.
Then in the last line (int*)((pS + j) + i) = temp;
doesn't work because you're a value to an address instead of a memory location
Remember to use *
to dereference a pointer to get the variable, i.e. the memory location the pointer points to. In C a[b]
is equivalent to *(a + b)
so just replace all those occurrences. I don't know why you do it "correctly" with *((int*)((pS + i) + j))
but didn't apply that to others
Even then you're calculating the index incorrectly. *((int*)((pS + i) + j))
is just pS[i + j] which is not the correct item you want. If you pass the 2D array as a 1D array you need to calculate the real index like this pS[i + j*width]
So to do
temp = pS[i + j*width];
pS[i + j*width] = pS[j + i*width];
pS[j + i*width] = temp;
just change it to
temp = *(pS + i + j*width);
*(pS + i + j*width) = *(pS + j + i*width);
*(pS + j + i*width) = temp;
You must enable all compiler warnings. They're very helpful and help you solve most of the above problem
First, thank for the really helpful explanation! Second, I work in Ubunto enviroment, in eclips. How can I enable the warning?
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 13:34
I don't know. If you do a manual compilation then just use-Wall -Wextra
Enabling flags (Wall, pedantic) for C/C++ compilation within Eclipse
– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 13:39
add a comment |
To solve this, you need to understand how arrays work in C.
Lets say you have a 3 * 3 matrix, that is declared like this:
int matrix[3][3];
While you imagine this to be a square like this:
+---+---+---+
| 0 | 1 | 2 |
+---+---+---+
| 3 | 4 | 5 |
+---+---+---+
| 6 | 7 | 8 |
+---+---+---+
For the computer it is a consecutive "line" in memory looking like this:
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
^
|____matrix
And variable matrix
holds the address of the first cell
So, if you want to access any cell without using the operator, you need to calculate the address of that cell.
Lets do this for the middle cell:
matrix[1][1];
This is the second cell of the second row, so you need to add the width of the first row to the start of the matrix, and then add one more cell from the start of the second row. And you want to derefernce the address to get to the value like so:
*(matrix + (3 * 1) + 1);
What if we wanted the middle cell of the third row? Same thing, but add width of two rows:
*(matrix + (3 * 2) + 1);
To sum up: if you want to access cell x in row y of the matrix you would calculate its address like this:
*(matrix + (with * y) + x);
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53238553%2frotate-matrix-without%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You're mixing up the pointer and the dereferenced value in the 3 lines
In the first line temp = (int)(pS);
you're assigning the pointer value to temp instead of the value that the pointer points to. Similarly you're also assigning the pointer value to the memory location like this *((int*)((pS + i) + j)) = (int*)((pS + j) + i);
which makes no sense.
Then in the last line (int*)((pS + j) + i) = temp;
doesn't work because you're a value to an address instead of a memory location
Remember to use *
to dereference a pointer to get the variable, i.e. the memory location the pointer points to. In C a[b]
is equivalent to *(a + b)
so just replace all those occurrences. I don't know why you do it "correctly" with *((int*)((pS + i) + j))
but didn't apply that to others
Even then you're calculating the index incorrectly. *((int*)((pS + i) + j))
is just pS[i + j] which is not the correct item you want. If you pass the 2D array as a 1D array you need to calculate the real index like this pS[i + j*width]
So to do
temp = pS[i + j*width];
pS[i + j*width] = pS[j + i*width];
pS[j + i*width] = temp;
just change it to
temp = *(pS + i + j*width);
*(pS + i + j*width) = *(pS + j + i*width);
*(pS + j + i*width) = temp;
You must enable all compiler warnings. They're very helpful and help you solve most of the above problem
First, thank for the really helpful explanation! Second, I work in Ubunto enviroment, in eclips. How can I enable the warning?
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 13:34
I don't know. If you do a manual compilation then just use-Wall -Wextra
Enabling flags (Wall, pedantic) for C/C++ compilation within Eclipse
– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 13:39
add a comment |
You're mixing up the pointer and the dereferenced value in the 3 lines
In the first line temp = (int)(pS);
you're assigning the pointer value to temp instead of the value that the pointer points to. Similarly you're also assigning the pointer value to the memory location like this *((int*)((pS + i) + j)) = (int*)((pS + j) + i);
which makes no sense.
Then in the last line (int*)((pS + j) + i) = temp;
doesn't work because you're a value to an address instead of a memory location
Remember to use *
to dereference a pointer to get the variable, i.e. the memory location the pointer points to. In C a[b]
is equivalent to *(a + b)
so just replace all those occurrences. I don't know why you do it "correctly" with *((int*)((pS + i) + j))
but didn't apply that to others
Even then you're calculating the index incorrectly. *((int*)((pS + i) + j))
is just pS[i + j] which is not the correct item you want. If you pass the 2D array as a 1D array you need to calculate the real index like this pS[i + j*width]
So to do
temp = pS[i + j*width];
pS[i + j*width] = pS[j + i*width];
pS[j + i*width] = temp;
just change it to
temp = *(pS + i + j*width);
*(pS + i + j*width) = *(pS + j + i*width);
*(pS + j + i*width) = temp;
You must enable all compiler warnings. They're very helpful and help you solve most of the above problem
First, thank for the really helpful explanation! Second, I work in Ubunto enviroment, in eclips. How can I enable the warning?
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 13:34
I don't know. If you do a manual compilation then just use-Wall -Wextra
Enabling flags (Wall, pedantic) for C/C++ compilation within Eclipse
– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 13:39
add a comment |
You're mixing up the pointer and the dereferenced value in the 3 lines
In the first line temp = (int)(pS);
you're assigning the pointer value to temp instead of the value that the pointer points to. Similarly you're also assigning the pointer value to the memory location like this *((int*)((pS + i) + j)) = (int*)((pS + j) + i);
which makes no sense.
Then in the last line (int*)((pS + j) + i) = temp;
doesn't work because you're a value to an address instead of a memory location
Remember to use *
to dereference a pointer to get the variable, i.e. the memory location the pointer points to. In C a[b]
is equivalent to *(a + b)
so just replace all those occurrences. I don't know why you do it "correctly" with *((int*)((pS + i) + j))
but didn't apply that to others
Even then you're calculating the index incorrectly. *((int*)((pS + i) + j))
is just pS[i + j] which is not the correct item you want. If you pass the 2D array as a 1D array you need to calculate the real index like this pS[i + j*width]
So to do
temp = pS[i + j*width];
pS[i + j*width] = pS[j + i*width];
pS[j + i*width] = temp;
just change it to
temp = *(pS + i + j*width);
*(pS + i + j*width) = *(pS + j + i*width);
*(pS + j + i*width) = temp;
You must enable all compiler warnings. They're very helpful and help you solve most of the above problem
You're mixing up the pointer and the dereferenced value in the 3 lines
In the first line temp = (int)(pS);
you're assigning the pointer value to temp instead of the value that the pointer points to. Similarly you're also assigning the pointer value to the memory location like this *((int*)((pS + i) + j)) = (int*)((pS + j) + i);
which makes no sense.
Then in the last line (int*)((pS + j) + i) = temp;
doesn't work because you're a value to an address instead of a memory location
Remember to use *
to dereference a pointer to get the variable, i.e. the memory location the pointer points to. In C a[b]
is equivalent to *(a + b)
so just replace all those occurrences. I don't know why you do it "correctly" with *((int*)((pS + i) + j))
but didn't apply that to others
Even then you're calculating the index incorrectly. *((int*)((pS + i) + j))
is just pS[i + j] which is not the correct item you want. If you pass the 2D array as a 1D array you need to calculate the real index like this pS[i + j*width]
So to do
temp = pS[i + j*width];
pS[i + j*width] = pS[j + i*width];
pS[j + i*width] = temp;
just change it to
temp = *(pS + i + j*width);
*(pS + i + j*width) = *(pS + j + i*width);
*(pS + j + i*width) = temp;
You must enable all compiler warnings. They're very helpful and help you solve most of the above problem
answered Nov 10 '18 at 13:04
phuclvphuclv
14.5k852216
14.5k852216
First, thank for the really helpful explanation! Second, I work in Ubunto enviroment, in eclips. How can I enable the warning?
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 13:34
I don't know. If you do a manual compilation then just use-Wall -Wextra
Enabling flags (Wall, pedantic) for C/C++ compilation within Eclipse
– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 13:39
add a comment |
First, thank for the really helpful explanation! Second, I work in Ubunto enviroment, in eclips. How can I enable the warning?
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 13:34
I don't know. If you do a manual compilation then just use-Wall -Wextra
Enabling flags (Wall, pedantic) for C/C++ compilation within Eclipse
– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 13:39
First, thank for the really helpful explanation! Second, I work in Ubunto enviroment, in eclips. How can I enable the warning?
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 13:34
First, thank for the really helpful explanation! Second, I work in Ubunto enviroment, in eclips. How can I enable the warning?
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 13:34
I don't know. If you do a manual compilation then just use
-Wall -Wextra
Enabling flags (Wall, pedantic) for C/C++ compilation within Eclipse– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 13:39
I don't know. If you do a manual compilation then just use
-Wall -Wextra
Enabling flags (Wall, pedantic) for C/C++ compilation within Eclipse– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 13:39
add a comment |
To solve this, you need to understand how arrays work in C.
Lets say you have a 3 * 3 matrix, that is declared like this:
int matrix[3][3];
While you imagine this to be a square like this:
+---+---+---+
| 0 | 1 | 2 |
+---+---+---+
| 3 | 4 | 5 |
+---+---+---+
| 6 | 7 | 8 |
+---+---+---+
For the computer it is a consecutive "line" in memory looking like this:
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
^
|____matrix
And variable matrix
holds the address of the first cell
So, if you want to access any cell without using the operator, you need to calculate the address of that cell.
Lets do this for the middle cell:
matrix[1][1];
This is the second cell of the second row, so you need to add the width of the first row to the start of the matrix, and then add one more cell from the start of the second row. And you want to derefernce the address to get to the value like so:
*(matrix + (3 * 1) + 1);
What if we wanted the middle cell of the third row? Same thing, but add width of two rows:
*(matrix + (3 * 2) + 1);
To sum up: if you want to access cell x in row y of the matrix you would calculate its address like this:
*(matrix + (with * y) + x);
add a comment |
To solve this, you need to understand how arrays work in C.
Lets say you have a 3 * 3 matrix, that is declared like this:
int matrix[3][3];
While you imagine this to be a square like this:
+---+---+---+
| 0 | 1 | 2 |
+---+---+---+
| 3 | 4 | 5 |
+---+---+---+
| 6 | 7 | 8 |
+---+---+---+
For the computer it is a consecutive "line" in memory looking like this:
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
^
|____matrix
And variable matrix
holds the address of the first cell
So, if you want to access any cell without using the operator, you need to calculate the address of that cell.
Lets do this for the middle cell:
matrix[1][1];
This is the second cell of the second row, so you need to add the width of the first row to the start of the matrix, and then add one more cell from the start of the second row. And you want to derefernce the address to get to the value like so:
*(matrix + (3 * 1) + 1);
What if we wanted the middle cell of the third row? Same thing, but add width of two rows:
*(matrix + (3 * 2) + 1);
To sum up: if you want to access cell x in row y of the matrix you would calculate its address like this:
*(matrix + (with * y) + x);
add a comment |
To solve this, you need to understand how arrays work in C.
Lets say you have a 3 * 3 matrix, that is declared like this:
int matrix[3][3];
While you imagine this to be a square like this:
+---+---+---+
| 0 | 1 | 2 |
+---+---+---+
| 3 | 4 | 5 |
+---+---+---+
| 6 | 7 | 8 |
+---+---+---+
For the computer it is a consecutive "line" in memory looking like this:
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
^
|____matrix
And variable matrix
holds the address of the first cell
So, if you want to access any cell without using the operator, you need to calculate the address of that cell.
Lets do this for the middle cell:
matrix[1][1];
This is the second cell of the second row, so you need to add the width of the first row to the start of the matrix, and then add one more cell from the start of the second row. And you want to derefernce the address to get to the value like so:
*(matrix + (3 * 1) + 1);
What if we wanted the middle cell of the third row? Same thing, but add width of two rows:
*(matrix + (3 * 2) + 1);
To sum up: if you want to access cell x in row y of the matrix you would calculate its address like this:
*(matrix + (with * y) + x);
To solve this, you need to understand how arrays work in C.
Lets say you have a 3 * 3 matrix, that is declared like this:
int matrix[3][3];
While you imagine this to be a square like this:
+---+---+---+
| 0 | 1 | 2 |
+---+---+---+
| 3 | 4 | 5 |
+---+---+---+
| 6 | 7 | 8 |
+---+---+---+
For the computer it is a consecutive "line" in memory looking like this:
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
^
|____matrix
And variable matrix
holds the address of the first cell
So, if you want to access any cell without using the operator, you need to calculate the address of that cell.
Lets do this for the middle cell:
matrix[1][1];
This is the second cell of the second row, so you need to add the width of the first row to the start of the matrix, and then add one more cell from the start of the second row. And you want to derefernce the address to get to the value like so:
*(matrix + (3 * 1) + 1);
What if we wanted the middle cell of the third row? Same thing, but add width of two rows:
*(matrix + (3 * 2) + 1);
To sum up: if you want to access cell x in row y of the matrix you would calculate its address like this:
*(matrix + (with * y) + x);
answered Nov 10 '18 at 12:59
Lev M.Lev M.
618112
618112
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53238553%2frotate-matrix-without%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
how is matrix rotation related to
?
– phuclv
Nov 10 '18 at 12:39
I can't swap elements by using: a[i][j] = temp ,etc.
– Itay Zemah
Nov 10 '18 at 12:46