Why would one use both, os.path.abspath and os.path.realpath?









up vote
45
down vote

favorite
9












In multiple open source projects, I have seen people do os.path.abspath(os.path.realpath(__file__)) to get the absolute path to the current file.



However, I find that os.path.abspath(__file__) and os.path.realpath(__file__) produce the same result. os.path.abspath(os.path.realpath(__file__)) seems to be a bit redundant.



Is there a reason people are using that?










share|improve this question



























    up vote
    45
    down vote

    favorite
    9












    In multiple open source projects, I have seen people do os.path.abspath(os.path.realpath(__file__)) to get the absolute path to the current file.



    However, I find that os.path.abspath(__file__) and os.path.realpath(__file__) produce the same result. os.path.abspath(os.path.realpath(__file__)) seems to be a bit redundant.



    Is there a reason people are using that?










    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      45
      down vote

      favorite
      9









      up vote
      45
      down vote

      favorite
      9






      9





      In multiple open source projects, I have seen people do os.path.abspath(os.path.realpath(__file__)) to get the absolute path to the current file.



      However, I find that os.path.abspath(__file__) and os.path.realpath(__file__) produce the same result. os.path.abspath(os.path.realpath(__file__)) seems to be a bit redundant.



      Is there a reason people are using that?










      share|improve this question















      In multiple open source projects, I have seen people do os.path.abspath(os.path.realpath(__file__)) to get the absolute path to the current file.



      However, I find that os.path.abspath(__file__) and os.path.realpath(__file__) produce the same result. os.path.abspath(os.path.realpath(__file__)) seems to be a bit redundant.



      Is there a reason people are using that?







      python






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jun 1 at 6:48









      Trilarion

      6,47153875




      6,47153875










      asked Jun 16 '16 at 15:30









      Chonghao Huang

      1,03641319




      1,03641319






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          38
          down vote



          accepted










          os.path.realpath derefences symbolic links on those operating systems which support them.



          os.path.abspath simply removes things like . and .. from the path giving a full path from the root of the directory tree to the named file (or symlink)



          For example, on Ubuntu



          $ ls -l
          total 0
          -rw-rw-r-- 1 guest guest 0 Jun 16 08:36 a
          lrwxrwxrwx 1 guest guest 1 Jun 16 08:36 b -> a

          $ python
          Python 2.7.11 (default, Dec 15 2015, 16:46:19)
          [GCC 4.8.4] on linux2
          Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.

          >>> from os.path import abspath, realpath

          >>> abspath('b')
          '/home/guest/play/paths/b'

          >>> realpath('b')
          '/home/guest/play/paths/a'


          Symlinks can contain relative paths, hence the need to use both. The inner call to realpath might return a path with embedded .. parts, which abspath then removes.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 4




            While this answer describes the difference between the two functions, it isn't true that the result of realpath() can contain .. components and doesn't really answer the question of why you would use both; jobrad's answer is more accurate.
            – Miles
            Mar 24 '17 at 3:41

















          up vote
          66
          down vote













          For your stated scenario, there is no reason to combine realpath and abspath, since os.path.realpath actually calls os.path.abspath before returning a result (I checked Python 2.5 to Python 3.6).




          • os.path.abspath returns the absolute path, but does NOT resolve symlinks.


          • os.path.realpath will first resolve any symbolic links in the path, and then return the absolute path.

          However, if you expect your path to contain a ~, neither abspath or realpath will resolve ~ to the user's home directory, and the resulting path will be invalid. You will need to use os.path.expanduser to resolve this to the user's directory.



          For the sake of a thorough explanation, here are some results which I've verified in Windows and Linux, in Python 3.4 and Python 2.6. The current directory (./) is my home directory, which looks like this:



          myhome
          |- data (symlink to /mnt/data)
          |- subdir (extra directory, for verbose explanation)




          # os.path.abspath returns the absolute path, but does NOT resolve symlinks
          os.path.abspath('./')
          '/home/myhome'
          os.path.abspath('./subdir/../data')
          '/home/myhome/data'


          # os.path.realpath will resolve symlinks AND return an absolute path from a relative path
          os.path.realpath('./')
          '/home/myhome'
          os.path.realpath('./subdir/../')
          '/home/myhome'
          os.path.realpath('./subdir/../data')
          '/mnt/data'

          # NEITHER abspath or realpath will resolve or remove ~.
          os.path.abspath('~/data')
          '/home/myhome/~/data'

          os.path.realpath('~/data')
          '/home/myhome/~/data'

          # And the returned path will be invalid
          os.path.exists(os.path.abspath('~/data'))
          False
          os.path.exists(os.path.realpath('~/data'))
          False

          # Use realpath + expanduser to resolve ~
          os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('./subdir/../data'))
          '/mnt/data'





          share|improve this answer
















          • 2




            Nice. To make your point your last example should be os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('~/subdir/../data'))
            – Arthur
            Apr 7 at 16:13











          • Then also do not forget about os.path.expandvars if variables are used in a path
            – Slavenskij
            Apr 11 at 6:55

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          In the layman terms, if you are trying to get the path of a shortcut file, absolute path gives the complete path of the file present in the shortcut location, while realpath gives the original location path of the file.



          Absolute path, os.path.abspath(), gives the complete path of the file which is located in the current working directory or the directory you mentioned.



          Real path, os.path.realpath(), gives the complete path of the file which is being referred.



          Eg:



          file = "shortcut_folder/filename"
          os.path.abspath(file) = "C:/Desktop/shortcut_folder/filename"
          os.path.realpath(file) = "D:/PyCharmProjects/Python1stClass/filename"





          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f37863476%2fwhy-would-one-use-both-os-path-abspath-and-os-path-realpath%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            38
            down vote



            accepted










            os.path.realpath derefences symbolic links on those operating systems which support them.



            os.path.abspath simply removes things like . and .. from the path giving a full path from the root of the directory tree to the named file (or symlink)



            For example, on Ubuntu



            $ ls -l
            total 0
            -rw-rw-r-- 1 guest guest 0 Jun 16 08:36 a
            lrwxrwxrwx 1 guest guest 1 Jun 16 08:36 b -> a

            $ python
            Python 2.7.11 (default, Dec 15 2015, 16:46:19)
            [GCC 4.8.4] on linux2
            Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.

            >>> from os.path import abspath, realpath

            >>> abspath('b')
            '/home/guest/play/paths/b'

            >>> realpath('b')
            '/home/guest/play/paths/a'


            Symlinks can contain relative paths, hence the need to use both. The inner call to realpath might return a path with embedded .. parts, which abspath then removes.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 4




              While this answer describes the difference between the two functions, it isn't true that the result of realpath() can contain .. components and doesn't really answer the question of why you would use both; jobrad's answer is more accurate.
              – Miles
              Mar 24 '17 at 3:41














            up vote
            38
            down vote



            accepted










            os.path.realpath derefences symbolic links on those operating systems which support them.



            os.path.abspath simply removes things like . and .. from the path giving a full path from the root of the directory tree to the named file (or symlink)



            For example, on Ubuntu



            $ ls -l
            total 0
            -rw-rw-r-- 1 guest guest 0 Jun 16 08:36 a
            lrwxrwxrwx 1 guest guest 1 Jun 16 08:36 b -> a

            $ python
            Python 2.7.11 (default, Dec 15 2015, 16:46:19)
            [GCC 4.8.4] on linux2
            Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.

            >>> from os.path import abspath, realpath

            >>> abspath('b')
            '/home/guest/play/paths/b'

            >>> realpath('b')
            '/home/guest/play/paths/a'


            Symlinks can contain relative paths, hence the need to use both. The inner call to realpath might return a path with embedded .. parts, which abspath then removes.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 4




              While this answer describes the difference between the two functions, it isn't true that the result of realpath() can contain .. components and doesn't really answer the question of why you would use both; jobrad's answer is more accurate.
              – Miles
              Mar 24 '17 at 3:41












            up vote
            38
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            38
            down vote



            accepted






            os.path.realpath derefences symbolic links on those operating systems which support them.



            os.path.abspath simply removes things like . and .. from the path giving a full path from the root of the directory tree to the named file (or symlink)



            For example, on Ubuntu



            $ ls -l
            total 0
            -rw-rw-r-- 1 guest guest 0 Jun 16 08:36 a
            lrwxrwxrwx 1 guest guest 1 Jun 16 08:36 b -> a

            $ python
            Python 2.7.11 (default, Dec 15 2015, 16:46:19)
            [GCC 4.8.4] on linux2
            Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.

            >>> from os.path import abspath, realpath

            >>> abspath('b')
            '/home/guest/play/paths/b'

            >>> realpath('b')
            '/home/guest/play/paths/a'


            Symlinks can contain relative paths, hence the need to use both. The inner call to realpath might return a path with embedded .. parts, which abspath then removes.






            share|improve this answer














            os.path.realpath derefences symbolic links on those operating systems which support them.



            os.path.abspath simply removes things like . and .. from the path giving a full path from the root of the directory tree to the named file (or symlink)



            For example, on Ubuntu



            $ ls -l
            total 0
            -rw-rw-r-- 1 guest guest 0 Jun 16 08:36 a
            lrwxrwxrwx 1 guest guest 1 Jun 16 08:36 b -> a

            $ python
            Python 2.7.11 (default, Dec 15 2015, 16:46:19)
            [GCC 4.8.4] on linux2
            Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.

            >>> from os.path import abspath, realpath

            >>> abspath('b')
            '/home/guest/play/paths/b'

            >>> realpath('b')
            '/home/guest/play/paths/a'


            Symlinks can contain relative paths, hence the need to use both. The inner call to realpath might return a path with embedded .. parts, which abspath then removes.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 24 '17 at 4:59









            Martin Tournoij

            17.6k126191




            17.6k126191










            answered Jun 16 '16 at 15:36









            kdopen

            6,53772939




            6,53772939







            • 4




              While this answer describes the difference between the two functions, it isn't true that the result of realpath() can contain .. components and doesn't really answer the question of why you would use both; jobrad's answer is more accurate.
              – Miles
              Mar 24 '17 at 3:41












            • 4




              While this answer describes the difference between the two functions, it isn't true that the result of realpath() can contain .. components and doesn't really answer the question of why you would use both; jobrad's answer is more accurate.
              – Miles
              Mar 24 '17 at 3:41







            4




            4




            While this answer describes the difference between the two functions, it isn't true that the result of realpath() can contain .. components and doesn't really answer the question of why you would use both; jobrad's answer is more accurate.
            – Miles
            Mar 24 '17 at 3:41




            While this answer describes the difference between the two functions, it isn't true that the result of realpath() can contain .. components and doesn't really answer the question of why you would use both; jobrad's answer is more accurate.
            – Miles
            Mar 24 '17 at 3:41












            up vote
            66
            down vote













            For your stated scenario, there is no reason to combine realpath and abspath, since os.path.realpath actually calls os.path.abspath before returning a result (I checked Python 2.5 to Python 3.6).




            • os.path.abspath returns the absolute path, but does NOT resolve symlinks.


            • os.path.realpath will first resolve any symbolic links in the path, and then return the absolute path.

            However, if you expect your path to contain a ~, neither abspath or realpath will resolve ~ to the user's home directory, and the resulting path will be invalid. You will need to use os.path.expanduser to resolve this to the user's directory.



            For the sake of a thorough explanation, here are some results which I've verified in Windows and Linux, in Python 3.4 and Python 2.6. The current directory (./) is my home directory, which looks like this:



            myhome
            |- data (symlink to /mnt/data)
            |- subdir (extra directory, for verbose explanation)




            # os.path.abspath returns the absolute path, but does NOT resolve symlinks
            os.path.abspath('./')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.abspath('./subdir/../data')
            '/home/myhome/data'


            # os.path.realpath will resolve symlinks AND return an absolute path from a relative path
            os.path.realpath('./')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.realpath('./subdir/../')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.realpath('./subdir/../data')
            '/mnt/data'

            # NEITHER abspath or realpath will resolve or remove ~.
            os.path.abspath('~/data')
            '/home/myhome/~/data'

            os.path.realpath('~/data')
            '/home/myhome/~/data'

            # And the returned path will be invalid
            os.path.exists(os.path.abspath('~/data'))
            False
            os.path.exists(os.path.realpath('~/data'))
            False

            # Use realpath + expanduser to resolve ~
            os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('./subdir/../data'))
            '/mnt/data'





            share|improve this answer
















            • 2




              Nice. To make your point your last example should be os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('~/subdir/../data'))
              – Arthur
              Apr 7 at 16:13











            • Then also do not forget about os.path.expandvars if variables are used in a path
              – Slavenskij
              Apr 11 at 6:55














            up vote
            66
            down vote













            For your stated scenario, there is no reason to combine realpath and abspath, since os.path.realpath actually calls os.path.abspath before returning a result (I checked Python 2.5 to Python 3.6).




            • os.path.abspath returns the absolute path, but does NOT resolve symlinks.


            • os.path.realpath will first resolve any symbolic links in the path, and then return the absolute path.

            However, if you expect your path to contain a ~, neither abspath or realpath will resolve ~ to the user's home directory, and the resulting path will be invalid. You will need to use os.path.expanduser to resolve this to the user's directory.



            For the sake of a thorough explanation, here are some results which I've verified in Windows and Linux, in Python 3.4 and Python 2.6. The current directory (./) is my home directory, which looks like this:



            myhome
            |- data (symlink to /mnt/data)
            |- subdir (extra directory, for verbose explanation)




            # os.path.abspath returns the absolute path, but does NOT resolve symlinks
            os.path.abspath('./')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.abspath('./subdir/../data')
            '/home/myhome/data'


            # os.path.realpath will resolve symlinks AND return an absolute path from a relative path
            os.path.realpath('./')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.realpath('./subdir/../')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.realpath('./subdir/../data')
            '/mnt/data'

            # NEITHER abspath or realpath will resolve or remove ~.
            os.path.abspath('~/data')
            '/home/myhome/~/data'

            os.path.realpath('~/data')
            '/home/myhome/~/data'

            # And the returned path will be invalid
            os.path.exists(os.path.abspath('~/data'))
            False
            os.path.exists(os.path.realpath('~/data'))
            False

            # Use realpath + expanduser to resolve ~
            os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('./subdir/../data'))
            '/mnt/data'





            share|improve this answer
















            • 2




              Nice. To make your point your last example should be os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('~/subdir/../data'))
              – Arthur
              Apr 7 at 16:13











            • Then also do not forget about os.path.expandvars if variables are used in a path
              – Slavenskij
              Apr 11 at 6:55












            up vote
            66
            down vote










            up vote
            66
            down vote









            For your stated scenario, there is no reason to combine realpath and abspath, since os.path.realpath actually calls os.path.abspath before returning a result (I checked Python 2.5 to Python 3.6).




            • os.path.abspath returns the absolute path, but does NOT resolve symlinks.


            • os.path.realpath will first resolve any symbolic links in the path, and then return the absolute path.

            However, if you expect your path to contain a ~, neither abspath or realpath will resolve ~ to the user's home directory, and the resulting path will be invalid. You will need to use os.path.expanduser to resolve this to the user's directory.



            For the sake of a thorough explanation, here are some results which I've verified in Windows and Linux, in Python 3.4 and Python 2.6. The current directory (./) is my home directory, which looks like this:



            myhome
            |- data (symlink to /mnt/data)
            |- subdir (extra directory, for verbose explanation)




            # os.path.abspath returns the absolute path, but does NOT resolve symlinks
            os.path.abspath('./')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.abspath('./subdir/../data')
            '/home/myhome/data'


            # os.path.realpath will resolve symlinks AND return an absolute path from a relative path
            os.path.realpath('./')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.realpath('./subdir/../')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.realpath('./subdir/../data')
            '/mnt/data'

            # NEITHER abspath or realpath will resolve or remove ~.
            os.path.abspath('~/data')
            '/home/myhome/~/data'

            os.path.realpath('~/data')
            '/home/myhome/~/data'

            # And the returned path will be invalid
            os.path.exists(os.path.abspath('~/data'))
            False
            os.path.exists(os.path.realpath('~/data'))
            False

            # Use realpath + expanduser to resolve ~
            os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('./subdir/../data'))
            '/mnt/data'





            share|improve this answer












            For your stated scenario, there is no reason to combine realpath and abspath, since os.path.realpath actually calls os.path.abspath before returning a result (I checked Python 2.5 to Python 3.6).




            • os.path.abspath returns the absolute path, but does NOT resolve symlinks.


            • os.path.realpath will first resolve any symbolic links in the path, and then return the absolute path.

            However, if you expect your path to contain a ~, neither abspath or realpath will resolve ~ to the user's home directory, and the resulting path will be invalid. You will need to use os.path.expanduser to resolve this to the user's directory.



            For the sake of a thorough explanation, here are some results which I've verified in Windows and Linux, in Python 3.4 and Python 2.6. The current directory (./) is my home directory, which looks like this:



            myhome
            |- data (symlink to /mnt/data)
            |- subdir (extra directory, for verbose explanation)




            # os.path.abspath returns the absolute path, but does NOT resolve symlinks
            os.path.abspath('./')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.abspath('./subdir/../data')
            '/home/myhome/data'


            # os.path.realpath will resolve symlinks AND return an absolute path from a relative path
            os.path.realpath('./')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.realpath('./subdir/../')
            '/home/myhome'
            os.path.realpath('./subdir/../data')
            '/mnt/data'

            # NEITHER abspath or realpath will resolve or remove ~.
            os.path.abspath('~/data')
            '/home/myhome/~/data'

            os.path.realpath('~/data')
            '/home/myhome/~/data'

            # And the returned path will be invalid
            os.path.exists(os.path.abspath('~/data'))
            False
            os.path.exists(os.path.realpath('~/data'))
            False

            # Use realpath + expanduser to resolve ~
            os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('./subdir/../data'))
            '/mnt/data'






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Oct 28 '16 at 18:29









            jobrad

            761154




            761154







            • 2




              Nice. To make your point your last example should be os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('~/subdir/../data'))
              – Arthur
              Apr 7 at 16:13











            • Then also do not forget about os.path.expandvars if variables are used in a path
              – Slavenskij
              Apr 11 at 6:55












            • 2




              Nice. To make your point your last example should be os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('~/subdir/../data'))
              – Arthur
              Apr 7 at 16:13











            • Then also do not forget about os.path.expandvars if variables are used in a path
              – Slavenskij
              Apr 11 at 6:55







            2




            2




            Nice. To make your point your last example should be os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('~/subdir/../data'))
            – Arthur
            Apr 7 at 16:13





            Nice. To make your point your last example should be os.path.realpath(os.path.expanduser('~/subdir/../data'))
            – Arthur
            Apr 7 at 16:13













            Then also do not forget about os.path.expandvars if variables are used in a path
            – Slavenskij
            Apr 11 at 6:55




            Then also do not forget about os.path.expandvars if variables are used in a path
            – Slavenskij
            Apr 11 at 6:55










            up vote
            3
            down vote













            In the layman terms, if you are trying to get the path of a shortcut file, absolute path gives the complete path of the file present in the shortcut location, while realpath gives the original location path of the file.



            Absolute path, os.path.abspath(), gives the complete path of the file which is located in the current working directory or the directory you mentioned.



            Real path, os.path.realpath(), gives the complete path of the file which is being referred.



            Eg:



            file = "shortcut_folder/filename"
            os.path.abspath(file) = "C:/Desktop/shortcut_folder/filename"
            os.path.realpath(file) = "D:/PyCharmProjects/Python1stClass/filename"





            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              In the layman terms, if you are trying to get the path of a shortcut file, absolute path gives the complete path of the file present in the shortcut location, while realpath gives the original location path of the file.



              Absolute path, os.path.abspath(), gives the complete path of the file which is located in the current working directory or the directory you mentioned.



              Real path, os.path.realpath(), gives the complete path of the file which is being referred.



              Eg:



              file = "shortcut_folder/filename"
              os.path.abspath(file) = "C:/Desktop/shortcut_folder/filename"
              os.path.realpath(file) = "D:/PyCharmProjects/Python1stClass/filename"





              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                In the layman terms, if you are trying to get the path of a shortcut file, absolute path gives the complete path of the file present in the shortcut location, while realpath gives the original location path of the file.



                Absolute path, os.path.abspath(), gives the complete path of the file which is located in the current working directory or the directory you mentioned.



                Real path, os.path.realpath(), gives the complete path of the file which is being referred.



                Eg:



                file = "shortcut_folder/filename"
                os.path.abspath(file) = "C:/Desktop/shortcut_folder/filename"
                os.path.realpath(file) = "D:/PyCharmProjects/Python1stClass/filename"





                share|improve this answer












                In the layman terms, if you are trying to get the path of a shortcut file, absolute path gives the complete path of the file present in the shortcut location, while realpath gives the original location path of the file.



                Absolute path, os.path.abspath(), gives the complete path of the file which is located in the current working directory or the directory you mentioned.



                Real path, os.path.realpath(), gives the complete path of the file which is being referred.



                Eg:



                file = "shortcut_folder/filename"
                os.path.abspath(file) = "C:/Desktop/shortcut_folder/filename"
                os.path.realpath(file) = "D:/PyCharmProjects/Python1stClass/filename"






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Oct 24 '17 at 14:06









                Uday S

                517312




                517312



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f37863476%2fwhy-would-one-use-both-os-path-abspath-and-os-path-realpath%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

                    Crossroads (UK TV series)

                    ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế