powershell arrays add-member - looking for elegant code










3















I have a pretty basic PowerShell array: $TestArray with 2 text columns: Price and TimeStamp (that's the way I get them, nothing to be done about this):



Price TimeStamp 
----- ----------------
0.0567 1542056680.72746
0.0567 1542056650.34414
0.0555 1542056197.46668
0.0551 1542056167.28967


I would like, in a single PowerShell line to add a rounded Time2 value



$Time2 = [math]::Round($TestArray.TimeStamp)


The code I am thinking of is:



 $TestArray | Add-Member -Name Time2 -MemberType NoteProperty -Value [math]::Round($Table.TimeStamp) 


Of course, I can do a ForEach loop; it would take care of it easily, but I would like to achieve this in this single line of code.



Any idea ?



Cheers,
Philippe










share|improve this question
























  • why the single line of code requirement? [frown] a foreach loop is often far faster than anything that uses the pipeline.

    – Lee_Dailey
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:33











  • Saving code length to add clarity for further maintenance (on this example, in real life, where I have no performance issues, I save overall 1 full page of code)

    – Philippe
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:01











  • thanks for the rationale. [grin] it's wrong, but that is OK. take a look at the code posted by mklement0 for a thorough refutation of "too long". as for maintainability ... laying the steps out clearly is FAR more maintainable than a more-than-simple pipeline. ///// still, as my papa said "if we were all the same, the world would be boring as heck!" [grin]

    – Lee_Dailey
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:48















3















I have a pretty basic PowerShell array: $TestArray with 2 text columns: Price and TimeStamp (that's the way I get them, nothing to be done about this):



Price TimeStamp 
----- ----------------
0.0567 1542056680.72746
0.0567 1542056650.34414
0.0555 1542056197.46668
0.0551 1542056167.28967


I would like, in a single PowerShell line to add a rounded Time2 value



$Time2 = [math]::Round($TestArray.TimeStamp)


The code I am thinking of is:



 $TestArray | Add-Member -Name Time2 -MemberType NoteProperty -Value [math]::Round($Table.TimeStamp) 


Of course, I can do a ForEach loop; it would take care of it easily, but I would like to achieve this in this single line of code.



Any idea ?



Cheers,
Philippe










share|improve this question
























  • why the single line of code requirement? [frown] a foreach loop is often far faster than anything that uses the pipeline.

    – Lee_Dailey
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:33











  • Saving code length to add clarity for further maintenance (on this example, in real life, where I have no performance issues, I save overall 1 full page of code)

    – Philippe
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:01











  • thanks for the rationale. [grin] it's wrong, but that is OK. take a look at the code posted by mklement0 for a thorough refutation of "too long". as for maintainability ... laying the steps out clearly is FAR more maintainable than a more-than-simple pipeline. ///// still, as my papa said "if we were all the same, the world would be boring as heck!" [grin]

    – Lee_Dailey
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:48













3












3








3


1






I have a pretty basic PowerShell array: $TestArray with 2 text columns: Price and TimeStamp (that's the way I get them, nothing to be done about this):



Price TimeStamp 
----- ----------------
0.0567 1542056680.72746
0.0567 1542056650.34414
0.0555 1542056197.46668
0.0551 1542056167.28967


I would like, in a single PowerShell line to add a rounded Time2 value



$Time2 = [math]::Round($TestArray.TimeStamp)


The code I am thinking of is:



 $TestArray | Add-Member -Name Time2 -MemberType NoteProperty -Value [math]::Round($Table.TimeStamp) 


Of course, I can do a ForEach loop; it would take care of it easily, but I would like to achieve this in this single line of code.



Any idea ?



Cheers,
Philippe










share|improve this question
















I have a pretty basic PowerShell array: $TestArray with 2 text columns: Price and TimeStamp (that's the way I get them, nothing to be done about this):



Price TimeStamp 
----- ----------------
0.0567 1542056680.72746
0.0567 1542056650.34414
0.0555 1542056197.46668
0.0551 1542056167.28967


I would like, in a single PowerShell line to add a rounded Time2 value



$Time2 = [math]::Round($TestArray.TimeStamp)


The code I am thinking of is:



 $TestArray | Add-Member -Name Time2 -MemberType NoteProperty -Value [math]::Round($Table.TimeStamp) 


Of course, I can do a ForEach loop; it would take care of it easily, but I would like to achieve this in this single line of code.



Any idea ?



Cheers,
Philippe







arrays powershell pipeline






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 '18 at 20:44









Mathias R. Jessen

58.3k463109




58.3k463109










asked Nov 12 '18 at 20:42









PhilippePhilippe

276




276












  • why the single line of code requirement? [frown] a foreach loop is often far faster than anything that uses the pipeline.

    – Lee_Dailey
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:33











  • Saving code length to add clarity for further maintenance (on this example, in real life, where I have no performance issues, I save overall 1 full page of code)

    – Philippe
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:01











  • thanks for the rationale. [grin] it's wrong, but that is OK. take a look at the code posted by mklement0 for a thorough refutation of "too long". as for maintainability ... laying the steps out clearly is FAR more maintainable than a more-than-simple pipeline. ///// still, as my papa said "if we were all the same, the world would be boring as heck!" [grin]

    – Lee_Dailey
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:48

















  • why the single line of code requirement? [frown] a foreach loop is often far faster than anything that uses the pipeline.

    – Lee_Dailey
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:33











  • Saving code length to add clarity for further maintenance (on this example, in real life, where I have no performance issues, I save overall 1 full page of code)

    – Philippe
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:01











  • thanks for the rationale. [grin] it's wrong, but that is OK. take a look at the code posted by mklement0 for a thorough refutation of "too long". as for maintainability ... laying the steps out clearly is FAR more maintainable than a more-than-simple pipeline. ///// still, as my papa said "if we were all the same, the world would be boring as heck!" [grin]

    – Lee_Dailey
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:48
















why the single line of code requirement? [frown] a foreach loop is often far faster than anything that uses the pipeline.

– Lee_Dailey
Nov 12 '18 at 21:33





why the single line of code requirement? [frown] a foreach loop is often far faster than anything that uses the pipeline.

– Lee_Dailey
Nov 12 '18 at 21:33













Saving code length to add clarity for further maintenance (on this example, in real life, where I have no performance issues, I save overall 1 full page of code)

– Philippe
Nov 12 '18 at 23:01





Saving code length to add clarity for further maintenance (on this example, in real life, where I have no performance issues, I save overall 1 full page of code)

– Philippe
Nov 12 '18 at 23:01













thanks for the rationale. [grin] it's wrong, but that is OK. take a look at the code posted by mklement0 for a thorough refutation of "too long". as for maintainability ... laying the steps out clearly is FAR more maintainable than a more-than-simple pipeline. ///// still, as my papa said "if we were all the same, the world would be boring as heck!" [grin]

– Lee_Dailey
Nov 12 '18 at 23:48





thanks for the rationale. [grin] it's wrong, but that is OK. take a look at the code posted by mklement0 for a thorough refutation of "too long". as for maintainability ... laying the steps out clearly is FAR more maintainable than a more-than-simple pipeline. ///// still, as my papa said "if we were all the same, the world would be boring as heck!" [grin]

– Lee_Dailey
Nov 12 '18 at 23:48












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5














Mathias R. Jessen's answer directly solves your problem, by creating a script property (type ScriptProperty) that dynamically calculates its value from the enclosing object's .TimeStamp property.



  • The advantage of this approach is that even later changes to .TimeStamp will correctly be reflected in .Time2, albeit at the cost of having to calculate the value on every access.

Manuel Batsching's answer offers a Select-Object-based alternative that creates static note properties (type NoteProperty), as you've originally attempted yourself.



  • The advantage of this approach is that you incur the cost of calculation only once, but later changes to .TimeStamp won't be reflected in .Time2.


To offer faster PSv5+ alternatives (a single method call each, spread across multiple lines for readability):



# ScriptProperty - dynamic
$TestArray.ForEach(
$_.psobject.properties.Add(
[psscriptproperty]::new('Time2', [math]::Round($this.TimeStamp) )
)
)




# NoteProperty - static
$TestArray.ForEach(
$_.psobject.properties.Add(
[psnoteproperty]::new('Time2', [math]::Round($_.TimeStamp))
)
)


The above solutions use the PSv4+ .ForEach() collection method and the PSv5+ static ::new() type method for calling constructors.




Finally, re one-liner:



The following foreach-loop based note-property solution would have solved your problem too, and would have been faster; while it is spread across multiple lines for readability here, it also works as a one-liner:



foreach ($el in $TestArray) 
Add-Member -InputObject $el -Name Time2 -MemberType NoteProperty `
-Value ([math]::Round($el.TimeStamp))



Generally, while the pipeline often enables more elegant, single-command solution, that - unfortunately - comes at the expense of performance.






share|improve this answer
































    2














    Alternatively you can achieve the same with Select-Object and a custom property:



    $TestArray | Select-Object *,@ n='Time2';e= [math]::Round($_.TimeStamp) 





    share|improve this answer























    • Very clear and useful comments Manuel. I'll finally go with your last alternative, because I need to do further comparaisons and maths on my TimeStamp value - therefore it is preferable to have it as static NoteProperty type.

      – Philippe
      Nov 12 '18 at 22:57


















    1














    Change the member type to ScriptProperty and refer to the individual array item as $this:



    $TestArray |Add-Member Time2 -Value [math]::Round($this.Timestamp) -MemberType ScriptProperty



    Worth noting that in this example, the pipeline itself acts as a foreach loop, unravelling the array and binding each individual item to Add-Member






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      I had tried with $this but without changing the -MemberType to ScriptProperty !

      – Philippe
      Nov 12 '18 at 21:02










    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53269794%2fpowershell-arrays-add-member-looking-for-elegant-code%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    Mathias R. Jessen's answer directly solves your problem, by creating a script property (type ScriptProperty) that dynamically calculates its value from the enclosing object's .TimeStamp property.



    • The advantage of this approach is that even later changes to .TimeStamp will correctly be reflected in .Time2, albeit at the cost of having to calculate the value on every access.

    Manuel Batsching's answer offers a Select-Object-based alternative that creates static note properties (type NoteProperty), as you've originally attempted yourself.



    • The advantage of this approach is that you incur the cost of calculation only once, but later changes to .TimeStamp won't be reflected in .Time2.


    To offer faster PSv5+ alternatives (a single method call each, spread across multiple lines for readability):



    # ScriptProperty - dynamic
    $TestArray.ForEach(
    $_.psobject.properties.Add(
    [psscriptproperty]::new('Time2', [math]::Round($this.TimeStamp) )
    )
    )




    # NoteProperty - static
    $TestArray.ForEach(
    $_.psobject.properties.Add(
    [psnoteproperty]::new('Time2', [math]::Round($_.TimeStamp))
    )
    )


    The above solutions use the PSv4+ .ForEach() collection method and the PSv5+ static ::new() type method for calling constructors.




    Finally, re one-liner:



    The following foreach-loop based note-property solution would have solved your problem too, and would have been faster; while it is spread across multiple lines for readability here, it also works as a one-liner:



    foreach ($el in $TestArray) 
    Add-Member -InputObject $el -Name Time2 -MemberType NoteProperty `
    -Value ([math]::Round($el.TimeStamp))



    Generally, while the pipeline often enables more elegant, single-command solution, that - unfortunately - comes at the expense of performance.






    share|improve this answer





























      5














      Mathias R. Jessen's answer directly solves your problem, by creating a script property (type ScriptProperty) that dynamically calculates its value from the enclosing object's .TimeStamp property.



      • The advantage of this approach is that even later changes to .TimeStamp will correctly be reflected in .Time2, albeit at the cost of having to calculate the value on every access.

      Manuel Batsching's answer offers a Select-Object-based alternative that creates static note properties (type NoteProperty), as you've originally attempted yourself.



      • The advantage of this approach is that you incur the cost of calculation only once, but later changes to .TimeStamp won't be reflected in .Time2.


      To offer faster PSv5+ alternatives (a single method call each, spread across multiple lines for readability):



      # ScriptProperty - dynamic
      $TestArray.ForEach(
      $_.psobject.properties.Add(
      [psscriptproperty]::new('Time2', [math]::Round($this.TimeStamp) )
      )
      )




      # NoteProperty - static
      $TestArray.ForEach(
      $_.psobject.properties.Add(
      [psnoteproperty]::new('Time2', [math]::Round($_.TimeStamp))
      )
      )


      The above solutions use the PSv4+ .ForEach() collection method and the PSv5+ static ::new() type method for calling constructors.




      Finally, re one-liner:



      The following foreach-loop based note-property solution would have solved your problem too, and would have been faster; while it is spread across multiple lines for readability here, it also works as a one-liner:



      foreach ($el in $TestArray) 
      Add-Member -InputObject $el -Name Time2 -MemberType NoteProperty `
      -Value ([math]::Round($el.TimeStamp))



      Generally, while the pipeline often enables more elegant, single-command solution, that - unfortunately - comes at the expense of performance.






      share|improve this answer



























        5












        5








        5







        Mathias R. Jessen's answer directly solves your problem, by creating a script property (type ScriptProperty) that dynamically calculates its value from the enclosing object's .TimeStamp property.



        • The advantage of this approach is that even later changes to .TimeStamp will correctly be reflected in .Time2, albeit at the cost of having to calculate the value on every access.

        Manuel Batsching's answer offers a Select-Object-based alternative that creates static note properties (type NoteProperty), as you've originally attempted yourself.



        • The advantage of this approach is that you incur the cost of calculation only once, but later changes to .TimeStamp won't be reflected in .Time2.


        To offer faster PSv5+ alternatives (a single method call each, spread across multiple lines for readability):



        # ScriptProperty - dynamic
        $TestArray.ForEach(
        $_.psobject.properties.Add(
        [psscriptproperty]::new('Time2', [math]::Round($this.TimeStamp) )
        )
        )




        # NoteProperty - static
        $TestArray.ForEach(
        $_.psobject.properties.Add(
        [psnoteproperty]::new('Time2', [math]::Round($_.TimeStamp))
        )
        )


        The above solutions use the PSv4+ .ForEach() collection method and the PSv5+ static ::new() type method for calling constructors.




        Finally, re one-liner:



        The following foreach-loop based note-property solution would have solved your problem too, and would have been faster; while it is spread across multiple lines for readability here, it also works as a one-liner:



        foreach ($el in $TestArray) 
        Add-Member -InputObject $el -Name Time2 -MemberType NoteProperty `
        -Value ([math]::Round($el.TimeStamp))



        Generally, while the pipeline often enables more elegant, single-command solution, that - unfortunately - comes at the expense of performance.






        share|improve this answer















        Mathias R. Jessen's answer directly solves your problem, by creating a script property (type ScriptProperty) that dynamically calculates its value from the enclosing object's .TimeStamp property.



        • The advantage of this approach is that even later changes to .TimeStamp will correctly be reflected in .Time2, albeit at the cost of having to calculate the value on every access.

        Manuel Batsching's answer offers a Select-Object-based alternative that creates static note properties (type NoteProperty), as you've originally attempted yourself.



        • The advantage of this approach is that you incur the cost of calculation only once, but later changes to .TimeStamp won't be reflected in .Time2.


        To offer faster PSv5+ alternatives (a single method call each, spread across multiple lines for readability):



        # ScriptProperty - dynamic
        $TestArray.ForEach(
        $_.psobject.properties.Add(
        [psscriptproperty]::new('Time2', [math]::Round($this.TimeStamp) )
        )
        )




        # NoteProperty - static
        $TestArray.ForEach(
        $_.psobject.properties.Add(
        [psnoteproperty]::new('Time2', [math]::Round($_.TimeStamp))
        )
        )


        The above solutions use the PSv4+ .ForEach() collection method and the PSv5+ static ::new() type method for calling constructors.




        Finally, re one-liner:



        The following foreach-loop based note-property solution would have solved your problem too, and would have been faster; while it is spread across multiple lines for readability here, it also works as a one-liner:



        foreach ($el in $TestArray) 
        Add-Member -InputObject $el -Name Time2 -MemberType NoteProperty `
        -Value ([math]::Round($el.TimeStamp))



        Generally, while the pipeline often enables more elegant, single-command solution, that - unfortunately - comes at the expense of performance.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 13 '18 at 4:56

























        answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:17









        mklement0mklement0

        135k21252289




        135k21252289























            2














            Alternatively you can achieve the same with Select-Object and a custom property:



            $TestArray | Select-Object *,@ n='Time2';e= [math]::Round($_.TimeStamp) 





            share|improve this answer























            • Very clear and useful comments Manuel. I'll finally go with your last alternative, because I need to do further comparaisons and maths on my TimeStamp value - therefore it is preferable to have it as static NoteProperty type.

              – Philippe
              Nov 12 '18 at 22:57















            2














            Alternatively you can achieve the same with Select-Object and a custom property:



            $TestArray | Select-Object *,@ n='Time2';e= [math]::Round($_.TimeStamp) 





            share|improve this answer























            • Very clear and useful comments Manuel. I'll finally go with your last alternative, because I need to do further comparaisons and maths on my TimeStamp value - therefore it is preferable to have it as static NoteProperty type.

              – Philippe
              Nov 12 '18 at 22:57













            2












            2








            2







            Alternatively you can achieve the same with Select-Object and a custom property:



            $TestArray | Select-Object *,@ n='Time2';e= [math]::Round($_.TimeStamp) 





            share|improve this answer













            Alternatively you can achieve the same with Select-Object and a custom property:



            $TestArray | Select-Object *,@ n='Time2';e= [math]::Round($_.TimeStamp) 






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 12 '18 at 21:06









            Manuel BatschingManuel Batsching

            976412




            976412












            • Very clear and useful comments Manuel. I'll finally go with your last alternative, because I need to do further comparaisons and maths on my TimeStamp value - therefore it is preferable to have it as static NoteProperty type.

              – Philippe
              Nov 12 '18 at 22:57

















            • Very clear and useful comments Manuel. I'll finally go with your last alternative, because I need to do further comparaisons and maths on my TimeStamp value - therefore it is preferable to have it as static NoteProperty type.

              – Philippe
              Nov 12 '18 at 22:57
















            Very clear and useful comments Manuel. I'll finally go with your last alternative, because I need to do further comparaisons and maths on my TimeStamp value - therefore it is preferable to have it as static NoteProperty type.

            – Philippe
            Nov 12 '18 at 22:57





            Very clear and useful comments Manuel. I'll finally go with your last alternative, because I need to do further comparaisons and maths on my TimeStamp value - therefore it is preferable to have it as static NoteProperty type.

            – Philippe
            Nov 12 '18 at 22:57











            1














            Change the member type to ScriptProperty and refer to the individual array item as $this:



            $TestArray |Add-Member Time2 -Value [math]::Round($this.Timestamp) -MemberType ScriptProperty



            Worth noting that in this example, the pipeline itself acts as a foreach loop, unravelling the array and binding each individual item to Add-Member






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              I had tried with $this but without changing the -MemberType to ScriptProperty !

              – Philippe
              Nov 12 '18 at 21:02















            1














            Change the member type to ScriptProperty and refer to the individual array item as $this:



            $TestArray |Add-Member Time2 -Value [math]::Round($this.Timestamp) -MemberType ScriptProperty



            Worth noting that in this example, the pipeline itself acts as a foreach loop, unravelling the array and binding each individual item to Add-Member






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              I had tried with $this but without changing the -MemberType to ScriptProperty !

              – Philippe
              Nov 12 '18 at 21:02













            1












            1








            1







            Change the member type to ScriptProperty and refer to the individual array item as $this:



            $TestArray |Add-Member Time2 -Value [math]::Round($this.Timestamp) -MemberType ScriptProperty



            Worth noting that in this example, the pipeline itself acts as a foreach loop, unravelling the array and binding each individual item to Add-Member






            share|improve this answer













            Change the member type to ScriptProperty and refer to the individual array item as $this:



            $TestArray |Add-Member Time2 -Value [math]::Round($this.Timestamp) -MemberType ScriptProperty



            Worth noting that in this example, the pipeline itself acts as a foreach loop, unravelling the array and binding each individual item to Add-Member







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 12 '18 at 20:50









            Mathias R. JessenMathias R. Jessen

            58.3k463109




            58.3k463109







            • 1





              I had tried with $this but without changing the -MemberType to ScriptProperty !

              – Philippe
              Nov 12 '18 at 21:02












            • 1





              I had tried with $this but without changing the -MemberType to ScriptProperty !

              – Philippe
              Nov 12 '18 at 21:02







            1




            1





            I had tried with $this but without changing the -MemberType to ScriptProperty !

            – Philippe
            Nov 12 '18 at 21:02





            I had tried with $this but without changing the -MemberType to ScriptProperty !

            – Philippe
            Nov 12 '18 at 21:02

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53269794%2fpowershell-arrays-add-member-looking-for-elegant-code%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            Crossroads (UK TV series)

            ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế