dual band router - which band am I supposed to use?










1















I've just bought my first dual band router – and i guess I didn't realize dual band meant it would actually create two wifi networks. I kind of thought maybe that one wifi network would just utilise both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz.



Anyway, so it's created two networks asus and asus_5g – I can connect to both and they both work. My question is – well what's the point of this? What situation would I connect to asus and when do I connect to asus_5g? Do I just make sure that half of the devices I have connected is on each network to balance the load?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Not all devices support 5G - For those, you use the 2G network.

    – confetti
    Aug 28 '18 at 1:19











  • @confetti - so i connect everything to the 5g network if it connects, otherwise i connect to 2g?

    – charlie angle
    Aug 28 '18 at 1:40






  • 1





    Yes, you usually always want to prefer 5G. It's faster and more stable. For me, it also has a better range, which could be due to signal interferences though. A lot of stuff uses 2.4GHz, not just Wi-Fi. Even your microwave does.

    – confetti
    Aug 28 '18 at 3:23






  • 1





    @confetti 5G and 2G are cellular phone technologies. You should use the correct WiFi terminology - 5GHz and 2.4GHz. (Yes, I know that most routers use 5G or 5g to denote the 5GHz network ;-) )

    – robinCTS
    Aug 28 '18 at 17:55















1















I've just bought my first dual band router – and i guess I didn't realize dual band meant it would actually create two wifi networks. I kind of thought maybe that one wifi network would just utilise both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz.



Anyway, so it's created two networks asus and asus_5g – I can connect to both and they both work. My question is – well what's the point of this? What situation would I connect to asus and when do I connect to asus_5g? Do I just make sure that half of the devices I have connected is on each network to balance the load?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Not all devices support 5G - For those, you use the 2G network.

    – confetti
    Aug 28 '18 at 1:19











  • @confetti - so i connect everything to the 5g network if it connects, otherwise i connect to 2g?

    – charlie angle
    Aug 28 '18 at 1:40






  • 1





    Yes, you usually always want to prefer 5G. It's faster and more stable. For me, it also has a better range, which could be due to signal interferences though. A lot of stuff uses 2.4GHz, not just Wi-Fi. Even your microwave does.

    – confetti
    Aug 28 '18 at 3:23






  • 1





    @confetti 5G and 2G are cellular phone technologies. You should use the correct WiFi terminology - 5GHz and 2.4GHz. (Yes, I know that most routers use 5G or 5g to denote the 5GHz network ;-) )

    – robinCTS
    Aug 28 '18 at 17:55













1












1








1


1






I've just bought my first dual band router – and i guess I didn't realize dual band meant it would actually create two wifi networks. I kind of thought maybe that one wifi network would just utilise both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz.



Anyway, so it's created two networks asus and asus_5g – I can connect to both and they both work. My question is – well what's the point of this? What situation would I connect to asus and when do I connect to asus_5g? Do I just make sure that half of the devices I have connected is on each network to balance the load?










share|improve this question
















I've just bought my first dual band router – and i guess I didn't realize dual band meant it would actually create two wifi networks. I kind of thought maybe that one wifi network would just utilise both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz.



Anyway, so it's created two networks asus and asus_5g – I can connect to both and they both work. My question is – well what's the point of this? What situation would I connect to asus and when do I connect to asus_5g? Do I just make sure that half of the devices I have connected is on each network to balance the load?







router dual-band






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 28 '18 at 6:25









Bob

46.1k20140173




46.1k20140173










asked Aug 28 '18 at 1:07









charlie anglecharlie angle

112




112







  • 1





    Not all devices support 5G - For those, you use the 2G network.

    – confetti
    Aug 28 '18 at 1:19











  • @confetti - so i connect everything to the 5g network if it connects, otherwise i connect to 2g?

    – charlie angle
    Aug 28 '18 at 1:40






  • 1





    Yes, you usually always want to prefer 5G. It's faster and more stable. For me, it also has a better range, which could be due to signal interferences though. A lot of stuff uses 2.4GHz, not just Wi-Fi. Even your microwave does.

    – confetti
    Aug 28 '18 at 3:23






  • 1





    @confetti 5G and 2G are cellular phone technologies. You should use the correct WiFi terminology - 5GHz and 2.4GHz. (Yes, I know that most routers use 5G or 5g to denote the 5GHz network ;-) )

    – robinCTS
    Aug 28 '18 at 17:55












  • 1





    Not all devices support 5G - For those, you use the 2G network.

    – confetti
    Aug 28 '18 at 1:19











  • @confetti - so i connect everything to the 5g network if it connects, otherwise i connect to 2g?

    – charlie angle
    Aug 28 '18 at 1:40






  • 1





    Yes, you usually always want to prefer 5G. It's faster and more stable. For me, it also has a better range, which could be due to signal interferences though. A lot of stuff uses 2.4GHz, not just Wi-Fi. Even your microwave does.

    – confetti
    Aug 28 '18 at 3:23






  • 1





    @confetti 5G and 2G are cellular phone technologies. You should use the correct WiFi terminology - 5GHz and 2.4GHz. (Yes, I know that most routers use 5G or 5g to denote the 5GHz network ;-) )

    – robinCTS
    Aug 28 '18 at 17:55







1




1





Not all devices support 5G - For those, you use the 2G network.

– confetti
Aug 28 '18 at 1:19





Not all devices support 5G - For those, you use the 2G network.

– confetti
Aug 28 '18 at 1:19













@confetti - so i connect everything to the 5g network if it connects, otherwise i connect to 2g?

– charlie angle
Aug 28 '18 at 1:40





@confetti - so i connect everything to the 5g network if it connects, otherwise i connect to 2g?

– charlie angle
Aug 28 '18 at 1:40




1




1





Yes, you usually always want to prefer 5G. It's faster and more stable. For me, it also has a better range, which could be due to signal interferences though. A lot of stuff uses 2.4GHz, not just Wi-Fi. Even your microwave does.

– confetti
Aug 28 '18 at 3:23





Yes, you usually always want to prefer 5G. It's faster and more stable. For me, it also has a better range, which could be due to signal interferences though. A lot of stuff uses 2.4GHz, not just Wi-Fi. Even your microwave does.

– confetti
Aug 28 '18 at 3:23




1




1





@confetti 5G and 2G are cellular phone technologies. You should use the correct WiFi terminology - 5GHz and 2.4GHz. (Yes, I know that most routers use 5G or 5g to denote the 5GHz network ;-) )

– robinCTS
Aug 28 '18 at 17:55





@confetti 5G and 2G are cellular phone technologies. You should use the correct WiFi terminology - 5GHz and 2.4GHz. (Yes, I know that most routers use 5G or 5g to denote the 5GHz network ;-) )

– robinCTS
Aug 28 '18 at 17:55










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














Depending on your model of wireless router, you might have the option to have the same network name broadcasted on both bands so that it appears as a single network. Under this configuration, clients will automatically choose which of the two bands to use. However (and this is a big however), many client devices aren't as intelligent as you might expect them to be and can frequently make a non-optimal choice.



The advantage of broadcasting two separate SSIDs is that you can manually choose which band to use. 2.4 GHz is slower and more prone to interference due to its limited number of non-overlapping channel options, but lower frequencies are generally better at penetrating walls. 5 GHz is faster and will likely see less interference, but may not be supported in some devices with older or low-cost WiFi chips.



Generally speaking, you should prefer 5 GHz unless you are using a device that doesn't support it or if you are in a spot where the 5 GHz signal is very weak. You can also try running a speed test on each band for each device to see which band gives you better performance on a per-device basis.






share|improve this answer
































    1














    There is no perfect answer. The 5 GHz network is the faster of the two. However, the range is shorter. The 2.4 GHz band will penetrate more walls and floors but is slower and prone to signal interference from the neighbors.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Can you point to a reference or source for your arguments? Especially the range part confuses me, I've usually had better experience with 5G on range and through walls.

      – confetti
      Aug 28 '18 at 3:21











    • @confetti Of course, signal strength and antennae layout matters.

      – iBug
      Aug 28 '18 at 3:33






    • 2





      @confetti: I didn't write the answer, but for range, see for example here. It matches my personal experience: In my home, the 5 GHz signal hasn't the same reach than the 2.4 GHz signal from the same router.

      – dirkt
      Aug 28 '18 at 5:45











    • @confetti as dirkt linked a good reference, I won't look for another. In radio, a higher frequency generally results in less ability to penetrate materials. The 60 Ghz band targeted for next gen Wi-Fi is basically "same room only" as the signal reflects off walls instead of penetrating them.

      – Matthew Zaleski
      Aug 29 '18 at 11:37










    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1352871%2fdual-band-router-which-band-am-i-supposed-to-use%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    Depending on your model of wireless router, you might have the option to have the same network name broadcasted on both bands so that it appears as a single network. Under this configuration, clients will automatically choose which of the two bands to use. However (and this is a big however), many client devices aren't as intelligent as you might expect them to be and can frequently make a non-optimal choice.



    The advantage of broadcasting two separate SSIDs is that you can manually choose which band to use. 2.4 GHz is slower and more prone to interference due to its limited number of non-overlapping channel options, but lower frequencies are generally better at penetrating walls. 5 GHz is faster and will likely see less interference, but may not be supported in some devices with older or low-cost WiFi chips.



    Generally speaking, you should prefer 5 GHz unless you are using a device that doesn't support it or if you are in a spot where the 5 GHz signal is very weak. You can also try running a speed test on each band for each device to see which band gives you better performance on a per-device basis.






    share|improve this answer





























      4














      Depending on your model of wireless router, you might have the option to have the same network name broadcasted on both bands so that it appears as a single network. Under this configuration, clients will automatically choose which of the two bands to use. However (and this is a big however), many client devices aren't as intelligent as you might expect them to be and can frequently make a non-optimal choice.



      The advantage of broadcasting two separate SSIDs is that you can manually choose which band to use. 2.4 GHz is slower and more prone to interference due to its limited number of non-overlapping channel options, but lower frequencies are generally better at penetrating walls. 5 GHz is faster and will likely see less interference, but may not be supported in some devices with older or low-cost WiFi chips.



      Generally speaking, you should prefer 5 GHz unless you are using a device that doesn't support it or if you are in a spot where the 5 GHz signal is very weak. You can also try running a speed test on each band for each device to see which band gives you better performance on a per-device basis.






      share|improve this answer



























        4












        4








        4







        Depending on your model of wireless router, you might have the option to have the same network name broadcasted on both bands so that it appears as a single network. Under this configuration, clients will automatically choose which of the two bands to use. However (and this is a big however), many client devices aren't as intelligent as you might expect them to be and can frequently make a non-optimal choice.



        The advantage of broadcasting two separate SSIDs is that you can manually choose which band to use. 2.4 GHz is slower and more prone to interference due to its limited number of non-overlapping channel options, but lower frequencies are generally better at penetrating walls. 5 GHz is faster and will likely see less interference, but may not be supported in some devices with older or low-cost WiFi chips.



        Generally speaking, you should prefer 5 GHz unless you are using a device that doesn't support it or if you are in a spot where the 5 GHz signal is very weak. You can also try running a speed test on each band for each device to see which band gives you better performance on a per-device basis.






        share|improve this answer















        Depending on your model of wireless router, you might have the option to have the same network name broadcasted on both bands so that it appears as a single network. Under this configuration, clients will automatically choose which of the two bands to use. However (and this is a big however), many client devices aren't as intelligent as you might expect them to be and can frequently make a non-optimal choice.



        The advantage of broadcasting two separate SSIDs is that you can manually choose which band to use. 2.4 GHz is slower and more prone to interference due to its limited number of non-overlapping channel options, but lower frequencies are generally better at penetrating walls. 5 GHz is faster and will likely see less interference, but may not be supported in some devices with older or low-cost WiFi chips.



        Generally speaking, you should prefer 5 GHz unless you are using a device that doesn't support it or if you are in a spot where the 5 GHz signal is very weak. You can also try running a speed test on each band for each device to see which band gives you better performance on a per-device basis.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Aug 28 '18 at 6:25









        Bob

        46.1k20140173




        46.1k20140173










        answered Aug 28 '18 at 3:31









        tlng05tlng05

        609510




        609510























            1














            There is no perfect answer. The 5 GHz network is the faster of the two. However, the range is shorter. The 2.4 GHz band will penetrate more walls and floors but is slower and prone to signal interference from the neighbors.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Can you point to a reference or source for your arguments? Especially the range part confuses me, I've usually had better experience with 5G on range and through walls.

              – confetti
              Aug 28 '18 at 3:21











            • @confetti Of course, signal strength and antennae layout matters.

              – iBug
              Aug 28 '18 at 3:33






            • 2





              @confetti: I didn't write the answer, but for range, see for example here. It matches my personal experience: In my home, the 5 GHz signal hasn't the same reach than the 2.4 GHz signal from the same router.

              – dirkt
              Aug 28 '18 at 5:45











            • @confetti as dirkt linked a good reference, I won't look for another. In radio, a higher frequency generally results in less ability to penetrate materials. The 60 Ghz band targeted for next gen Wi-Fi is basically "same room only" as the signal reflects off walls instead of penetrating them.

              – Matthew Zaleski
              Aug 29 '18 at 11:37















            1














            There is no perfect answer. The 5 GHz network is the faster of the two. However, the range is shorter. The 2.4 GHz band will penetrate more walls and floors but is slower and prone to signal interference from the neighbors.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Can you point to a reference or source for your arguments? Especially the range part confuses me, I've usually had better experience with 5G on range and through walls.

              – confetti
              Aug 28 '18 at 3:21











            • @confetti Of course, signal strength and antennae layout matters.

              – iBug
              Aug 28 '18 at 3:33






            • 2





              @confetti: I didn't write the answer, but for range, see for example here. It matches my personal experience: In my home, the 5 GHz signal hasn't the same reach than the 2.4 GHz signal from the same router.

              – dirkt
              Aug 28 '18 at 5:45











            • @confetti as dirkt linked a good reference, I won't look for another. In radio, a higher frequency generally results in less ability to penetrate materials. The 60 Ghz band targeted for next gen Wi-Fi is basically "same room only" as the signal reflects off walls instead of penetrating them.

              – Matthew Zaleski
              Aug 29 '18 at 11:37













            1












            1








            1







            There is no perfect answer. The 5 GHz network is the faster of the two. However, the range is shorter. The 2.4 GHz band will penetrate more walls and floors but is slower and prone to signal interference from the neighbors.






            share|improve this answer















            There is no perfect answer. The 5 GHz network is the faster of the two. However, the range is shorter. The 2.4 GHz band will penetrate more walls and floors but is slower and prone to signal interference from the neighbors.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Aug 28 '18 at 6:26









            Bob

            46.1k20140173




            46.1k20140173










            answered Aug 28 '18 at 3:05









            Matthew ZaleskiMatthew Zaleski

            111




            111












            • Can you point to a reference or source for your arguments? Especially the range part confuses me, I've usually had better experience with 5G on range and through walls.

              – confetti
              Aug 28 '18 at 3:21











            • @confetti Of course, signal strength and antennae layout matters.

              – iBug
              Aug 28 '18 at 3:33






            • 2





              @confetti: I didn't write the answer, but for range, see for example here. It matches my personal experience: In my home, the 5 GHz signal hasn't the same reach than the 2.4 GHz signal from the same router.

              – dirkt
              Aug 28 '18 at 5:45











            • @confetti as dirkt linked a good reference, I won't look for another. In radio, a higher frequency generally results in less ability to penetrate materials. The 60 Ghz band targeted for next gen Wi-Fi is basically "same room only" as the signal reflects off walls instead of penetrating them.

              – Matthew Zaleski
              Aug 29 '18 at 11:37

















            • Can you point to a reference or source for your arguments? Especially the range part confuses me, I've usually had better experience with 5G on range and through walls.

              – confetti
              Aug 28 '18 at 3:21











            • @confetti Of course, signal strength and antennae layout matters.

              – iBug
              Aug 28 '18 at 3:33






            • 2





              @confetti: I didn't write the answer, but for range, see for example here. It matches my personal experience: In my home, the 5 GHz signal hasn't the same reach than the 2.4 GHz signal from the same router.

              – dirkt
              Aug 28 '18 at 5:45











            • @confetti as dirkt linked a good reference, I won't look for another. In radio, a higher frequency generally results in less ability to penetrate materials. The 60 Ghz band targeted for next gen Wi-Fi is basically "same room only" as the signal reflects off walls instead of penetrating them.

              – Matthew Zaleski
              Aug 29 '18 at 11:37
















            Can you point to a reference or source for your arguments? Especially the range part confuses me, I've usually had better experience with 5G on range and through walls.

            – confetti
            Aug 28 '18 at 3:21





            Can you point to a reference or source for your arguments? Especially the range part confuses me, I've usually had better experience with 5G on range and through walls.

            – confetti
            Aug 28 '18 at 3:21













            @confetti Of course, signal strength and antennae layout matters.

            – iBug
            Aug 28 '18 at 3:33





            @confetti Of course, signal strength and antennae layout matters.

            – iBug
            Aug 28 '18 at 3:33




            2




            2





            @confetti: I didn't write the answer, but for range, see for example here. It matches my personal experience: In my home, the 5 GHz signal hasn't the same reach than the 2.4 GHz signal from the same router.

            – dirkt
            Aug 28 '18 at 5:45





            @confetti: I didn't write the answer, but for range, see for example here. It matches my personal experience: In my home, the 5 GHz signal hasn't the same reach than the 2.4 GHz signal from the same router.

            – dirkt
            Aug 28 '18 at 5:45













            @confetti as dirkt linked a good reference, I won't look for another. In radio, a higher frequency generally results in less ability to penetrate materials. The 60 Ghz band targeted for next gen Wi-Fi is basically "same room only" as the signal reflects off walls instead of penetrating them.

            – Matthew Zaleski
            Aug 29 '18 at 11:37





            @confetti as dirkt linked a good reference, I won't look for another. In radio, a higher frequency generally results in less ability to penetrate materials. The 60 Ghz band targeted for next gen Wi-Fi is basically "same room only" as the signal reflects off walls instead of penetrating them.

            – Matthew Zaleski
            Aug 29 '18 at 11:37

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1352871%2fdual-band-router-which-band-am-i-supposed-to-use%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            Crossroads (UK TV series)

            ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế