Unit Testing for VS2017 project










1















I have an ASP.NET application (a basic form where I capture some input) in VS2017.



One of the fields on the form is Mark, which is an integer.



I have the following block of code for the Mark, in my .cs file.



 [Display(Name = "Mark")]
[Range(1, 10, ErrorMessage = "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
public int Mark get; set;


I've created a MSTest project for this application to write Unit Tests.



My question is, do you write Test Cases for this block to verify the input value is in the expected range?



If yes, how you write that?



I've started with this.



 [DataRow(0, "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
[DataRow(11, "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
[DataTestMethod]
public void TestMark_IsMarkValid_NotValid(int mark, string expectedMsg)

//Arrange
Student testStudent = new Student();
testStudent.Mark = mark; //this does not throw any error, although the assigned value is outside of the defined range. But it looks like the range validation only applies to the webform.

//Act

string actualMsg = "Mark must be between 1 and 10"; //this is not correct. I was thinking to capture in the actual result the error message yield by the Range validation, but assigning a value outside range doesn't yield any error message.

//Assert
Assert.AreEqual(expectedMsg, actualMsg);



Now, not sure if that block should be in scope for unit testing. If it should be, I have a feeling the approach I've taken is not correct.



Any thoughts, please?



Many thanks,
Cosmin










share|improve this question




























    1















    I have an ASP.NET application (a basic form where I capture some input) in VS2017.



    One of the fields on the form is Mark, which is an integer.



    I have the following block of code for the Mark, in my .cs file.



     [Display(Name = "Mark")]
    [Range(1, 10, ErrorMessage = "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
    public int Mark get; set;


    I've created a MSTest project for this application to write Unit Tests.



    My question is, do you write Test Cases for this block to verify the input value is in the expected range?



    If yes, how you write that?



    I've started with this.



     [DataRow(0, "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
    [DataRow(11, "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
    [DataTestMethod]
    public void TestMark_IsMarkValid_NotValid(int mark, string expectedMsg)

    //Arrange
    Student testStudent = new Student();
    testStudent.Mark = mark; //this does not throw any error, although the assigned value is outside of the defined range. But it looks like the range validation only applies to the webform.

    //Act

    string actualMsg = "Mark must be between 1 and 10"; //this is not correct. I was thinking to capture in the actual result the error message yield by the Range validation, but assigning a value outside range doesn't yield any error message.

    //Assert
    Assert.AreEqual(expectedMsg, actualMsg);



    Now, not sure if that block should be in scope for unit testing. If it should be, I have a feeling the approach I've taken is not correct.



    Any thoughts, please?



    Many thanks,
    Cosmin










    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1








      I have an ASP.NET application (a basic form where I capture some input) in VS2017.



      One of the fields on the form is Mark, which is an integer.



      I have the following block of code for the Mark, in my .cs file.



       [Display(Name = "Mark")]
      [Range(1, 10, ErrorMessage = "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
      public int Mark get; set;


      I've created a MSTest project for this application to write Unit Tests.



      My question is, do you write Test Cases for this block to verify the input value is in the expected range?



      If yes, how you write that?



      I've started with this.



       [DataRow(0, "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
      [DataRow(11, "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
      [DataTestMethod]
      public void TestMark_IsMarkValid_NotValid(int mark, string expectedMsg)

      //Arrange
      Student testStudent = new Student();
      testStudent.Mark = mark; //this does not throw any error, although the assigned value is outside of the defined range. But it looks like the range validation only applies to the webform.

      //Act

      string actualMsg = "Mark must be between 1 and 10"; //this is not correct. I was thinking to capture in the actual result the error message yield by the Range validation, but assigning a value outside range doesn't yield any error message.

      //Assert
      Assert.AreEqual(expectedMsg, actualMsg);



      Now, not sure if that block should be in scope for unit testing. If it should be, I have a feeling the approach I've taken is not correct.



      Any thoughts, please?



      Many thanks,
      Cosmin










      share|improve this question
















      I have an ASP.NET application (a basic form where I capture some input) in VS2017.



      One of the fields on the form is Mark, which is an integer.



      I have the following block of code for the Mark, in my .cs file.



       [Display(Name = "Mark")]
      [Range(1, 10, ErrorMessage = "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
      public int Mark get; set;


      I've created a MSTest project for this application to write Unit Tests.



      My question is, do you write Test Cases for this block to verify the input value is in the expected range?



      If yes, how you write that?



      I've started with this.



       [DataRow(0, "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
      [DataRow(11, "Mark must be between 1 and 10")]
      [DataTestMethod]
      public void TestMark_IsMarkValid_NotValid(int mark, string expectedMsg)

      //Arrange
      Student testStudent = new Student();
      testStudent.Mark = mark; //this does not throw any error, although the assigned value is outside of the defined range. But it looks like the range validation only applies to the webform.

      //Act

      string actualMsg = "Mark must be between 1 and 10"; //this is not correct. I was thinking to capture in the actual result the error message yield by the Range validation, but assigning a value outside range doesn't yield any error message.

      //Assert
      Assert.AreEqual(expectedMsg, actualMsg);



      Now, not sure if that block should be in scope for unit testing. If it should be, I have a feeling the approach I've taken is not correct.



      Any thoughts, please?



      Many thanks,
      Cosmin







      c# visual-studio unit-testing visual-studio-2017 mstest






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 15 '18 at 2:28









      Jayendran

      3,39431437




      3,39431437










      asked Nov 12 '18 at 9:18









      CosminCosmin

      274




      274






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Interesting question. I'm not certain that there is a definitively correct answer. But here are my thoughts :



          1) "Mark" is a property. We don't need to unit test a property because Microsoft have already tested that properties work.



          2) The attributes do not affect the property, but provide information about the property that others can use. That is why your unit test passes the test for the value. The form uses the attributes, your unit test does not. That is why your unit test can assign any value.



          3) If you really want to limit the value of the variable then limit it in the Student class - either by a setter or else explicit get/set and a backing variable - you can never trust any data submitted by the browser.



          4) Testing a UI is not easy. We have a test team that tests by hand. We have tried several tools but none is outstanding. Keep your business logic out of your UI and put it in business classes where it can be easily tested.



          So, to answer your question, I personally would not test that the attribute functions in a unit test.



          I hope that helps.






          share|improve this answer























          • Very well made points. I agree the UI and the business logic should be kept separate. Thanks for your input.

            – Cosmin
            Nov 12 '18 at 11:33










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53259041%2funit-testing-for-vs2017-project%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          Interesting question. I'm not certain that there is a definitively correct answer. But here are my thoughts :



          1) "Mark" is a property. We don't need to unit test a property because Microsoft have already tested that properties work.



          2) The attributes do not affect the property, but provide information about the property that others can use. That is why your unit test passes the test for the value. The form uses the attributes, your unit test does not. That is why your unit test can assign any value.



          3) If you really want to limit the value of the variable then limit it in the Student class - either by a setter or else explicit get/set and a backing variable - you can never trust any data submitted by the browser.



          4) Testing a UI is not easy. We have a test team that tests by hand. We have tried several tools but none is outstanding. Keep your business logic out of your UI and put it in business classes where it can be easily tested.



          So, to answer your question, I personally would not test that the attribute functions in a unit test.



          I hope that helps.






          share|improve this answer























          • Very well made points. I agree the UI and the business logic should be kept separate. Thanks for your input.

            – Cosmin
            Nov 12 '18 at 11:33















          2














          Interesting question. I'm not certain that there is a definitively correct answer. But here are my thoughts :



          1) "Mark" is a property. We don't need to unit test a property because Microsoft have already tested that properties work.



          2) The attributes do not affect the property, but provide information about the property that others can use. That is why your unit test passes the test for the value. The form uses the attributes, your unit test does not. That is why your unit test can assign any value.



          3) If you really want to limit the value of the variable then limit it in the Student class - either by a setter or else explicit get/set and a backing variable - you can never trust any data submitted by the browser.



          4) Testing a UI is not easy. We have a test team that tests by hand. We have tried several tools but none is outstanding. Keep your business logic out of your UI and put it in business classes where it can be easily tested.



          So, to answer your question, I personally would not test that the attribute functions in a unit test.



          I hope that helps.






          share|improve this answer























          • Very well made points. I agree the UI and the business logic should be kept separate. Thanks for your input.

            – Cosmin
            Nov 12 '18 at 11:33













          2












          2








          2







          Interesting question. I'm not certain that there is a definitively correct answer. But here are my thoughts :



          1) "Mark" is a property. We don't need to unit test a property because Microsoft have already tested that properties work.



          2) The attributes do not affect the property, but provide information about the property that others can use. That is why your unit test passes the test for the value. The form uses the attributes, your unit test does not. That is why your unit test can assign any value.



          3) If you really want to limit the value of the variable then limit it in the Student class - either by a setter or else explicit get/set and a backing variable - you can never trust any data submitted by the browser.



          4) Testing a UI is not easy. We have a test team that tests by hand. We have tried several tools but none is outstanding. Keep your business logic out of your UI and put it in business classes where it can be easily tested.



          So, to answer your question, I personally would not test that the attribute functions in a unit test.



          I hope that helps.






          share|improve this answer













          Interesting question. I'm not certain that there is a definitively correct answer. But here are my thoughts :



          1) "Mark" is a property. We don't need to unit test a property because Microsoft have already tested that properties work.



          2) The attributes do not affect the property, but provide information about the property that others can use. That is why your unit test passes the test for the value. The form uses the attributes, your unit test does not. That is why your unit test can assign any value.



          3) If you really want to limit the value of the variable then limit it in the Student class - either by a setter or else explicit get/set and a backing variable - you can never trust any data submitted by the browser.



          4) Testing a UI is not easy. We have a test team that tests by hand. We have tried several tools but none is outstanding. Keep your business logic out of your UI and put it in business classes where it can be easily tested.



          So, to answer your question, I personally would not test that the attribute functions in a unit test.



          I hope that helps.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 12 '18 at 10:03









          MarkMark

          22149




          22149












          • Very well made points. I agree the UI and the business logic should be kept separate. Thanks for your input.

            – Cosmin
            Nov 12 '18 at 11:33

















          • Very well made points. I agree the UI and the business logic should be kept separate. Thanks for your input.

            – Cosmin
            Nov 12 '18 at 11:33
















          Very well made points. I agree the UI and the business logic should be kept separate. Thanks for your input.

          – Cosmin
          Nov 12 '18 at 11:33





          Very well made points. I agree the UI and the business logic should be kept separate. Thanks for your input.

          – Cosmin
          Nov 12 '18 at 11:33



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53259041%2funit-testing-for-vs2017-project%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

          Edmonton

          Crossroads (UK TV series)