Beginner probability question about the phrase “order doesn't matter”

Beginner probability question about the phrase “order doesn't matter”



This is a lame question but it's been bugging me for a while...



A father and his son are at a diner and each make one selection (randomly and independently) from a list of $10$ different dishes on a menu. What is the probability they choose different dishes?



Let $E$ be the event that they choose separate dishes. Let's condition on the father ordering first (call the event $F$) then,



$$P(E) = P(E mid F) P(F) + P(E mid F^c) P(F^c)=left(frac12right)left(frac910right)+left(frac12right)left(frac910right) = frac910$$



Question 1: I don't think you can say "order doesn't matter" for this problem. I think order does matter. Is that correct?



You could say "regardless of the order for this situation the conditional probabilities happen to be symmetrical, $P(E|F) = P(E|F^c) = 9/10$, and since the probability of the conditioning event is one half, the probability of the event in question is equal to just one of the conditional probabilities." That is $P(E) = P(E|F)$. Is that the right way to think about this problem?



Let's say I condition on the dish ordered by the first person



$$sum_i=1^10 P(E mid T=i)P(T=i) = sum_i=1^10 frac910frac110 = 9/10$$



Question 2: Is this the same situation where "order does matter" it's just that the $P(E)$ is equal to either $P(E mid T=i)P(T=i)$ summed for all $i$ whether the father or son goes first?



Question 3: If order does matter, then how does the problem change if you say they choose them exactly simultaneously? Thanks.





$begingroup$
Your equations seem to indicate order doesn't matter. All $P(E|K)=P(E)=0.9$ for any condition $K$. Where does the order come in?
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Sep 12 '18 at 2:56





$begingroup$
@herbsteinberg Hmmmmm what do you think of this... I think one way to solve the problem is you condition on the father choosing a dish first, thereby making "order matter" and then you use $P(E) = P(E mid F) P(F) + P(E mid F^c) P(F^c)$ which will solve the problem. But then order doesn't need to matter to solve this problem... so I suppose order doesn't matter unless you define it that way in how you arbitrarily condition it?
$endgroup$
– HJ_beginner
Sep 12 '18 at 3:00






$begingroup$
Order matters if $P(E|F)=1$, that is the son chooses something other than what the father chooses. When the choices are independent, order does not matter.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Sep 12 '18 at 15:17





$begingroup$
@herbsteinberg that is very helpful. When thinking about the sum of a two dice roll, you could condition on the outcome of the first roll (and call it the first outcome) but the outcome of each roll are independent so "order doesn't matter" for the sum of two dice
$endgroup$
– HJ_beginner
Sep 12 '18 at 17:50




3 Answers
3



I don't understand what you are trying to express.



There are two seperate events: the father choose a dish, and the son choose a dish.



It doesn't matter whether they do it simutalneously, or one after the other, the probability is always $frac910$





$begingroup$
Thanks for reading through my thought process. I suppose if you look at all the set of possible outcomes then $9$ out of $10$ will be in the event that they choose different dishes. In this manner it's easy to see order isn't really part of the question... I think it's also a valid way to solve the problem by conditioning on the dish that one of them chooses, though perhaps order doesn't matter there.
$endgroup$
– HJ_beginner
Sep 12 '18 at 2:57



We can say that the order doesn't affect the probability. Of course, father choosing then son would be a different experiment from its opposite. Father and son are just labels and do not affect the probability of the event.



If they do it simultaneously, then there are $10times 10 = 100$ different outcomes, with $10$ where they choose the same dish. So $frac10100 = frac110$ of choosing the same dish, which is equivalent to $frac910$ of chosing different.





$begingroup$
That is helpful... is this true: father choosing first is a different experiment then the son choosing first, but either way the final probability is the same and the son/father are just arbitrary labels.
$endgroup$
– HJ_beginner
Sep 12 '18 at 3:02



What is the chance that Father and Son choose the same dish? For that, we need to fix one dish, then compare the other. Say we know what Father chose, now the question basically is: Let the son pick a number from 1 to 10 and see if it's the one number chosen by Father: $frac110$ chance (and a $frac910$ chance of picking something else).



It doesn't matter if the Son or the Father 'picks first'; what matters here is that we take one of the outcomes as a reference, then compare the other to it. The results do not vary if we change the reference point.



Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!



But avoid



Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.



To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.



Required, but never shown



Required, but never shown




By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Edmonton

Crossroads (UK TV series)