how to check if the first line of file contain a specific string? [duplicate]
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
How to print file content only if the first line matches a certain pattern?
5 answers
I need to write a shell script that find and print all files in a directory which starts with the string: #include
.
Now, I know how to check if a string is in the file, by using:
for f in `ls`; do
if grep -q 'MyString' $f; then:
#DO SOMETHING
fi
but how can I apply this to the first line?
I thought to maybe create a variable of the first line and check if it starts with #include
, but I'm not sure how to do this. I tried the read
command but I fail to read into a variable.
I'd like to hear other approaches to this problem; maybe awk?
Anyway, remember, I need to check if the first line starts with #include
, not if it contains that string.
That's why I found those questions: How to print file content only if the first line matches a certain pattern?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5536018/how-to-print-matched-regex-pattern-using-awk
they are not completely helping.
shell grep read
marked as duplicate by don_crissti, elbarna, RalfFriedl, mosvy, G-Man Nov 11 at 23:52
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
How to print file content only if the first line matches a certain pattern?
5 answers
I need to write a shell script that find and print all files in a directory which starts with the string: #include
.
Now, I know how to check if a string is in the file, by using:
for f in `ls`; do
if grep -q 'MyString' $f; then:
#DO SOMETHING
fi
but how can I apply this to the first line?
I thought to maybe create a variable of the first line and check if it starts with #include
, but I'm not sure how to do this. I tried the read
command but I fail to read into a variable.
I'd like to hear other approaches to this problem; maybe awk?
Anyway, remember, I need to check if the first line starts with #include
, not if it contains that string.
That's why I found those questions: How to print file content only if the first line matches a certain pattern?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5536018/how-to-print-matched-regex-pattern-using-awk
they are not completely helping.
shell grep read
marked as duplicate by don_crissti, elbarna, RalfFriedl, mosvy, G-Man Nov 11 at 23:52
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
5
Tip: don't use ls in scripts, it invariably leads to problems.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:02
I think unix.stackexchange.com/a/232655/117549 is reasonably close -- just anchor the pattern.
– Jeff Schaller
Nov 9 at 11:28
@ctrl-alt-delor so I shall use "in *" instead? no problem... but what kind of problem 'ls' can cause?
– Z E Nir
Nov 10 at 15:55
It is just thatls
is hard to parse, it was not designed for the computer to read, but for humans. It is often used when not needed. There are other tools: just that are designed for the job:*
,find
, …
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 10 at 19:31
@ctrl-alt-delor Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 11 at 9:12
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
How to print file content only if the first line matches a certain pattern?
5 answers
I need to write a shell script that find and print all files in a directory which starts with the string: #include
.
Now, I know how to check if a string is in the file, by using:
for f in `ls`; do
if grep -q 'MyString' $f; then:
#DO SOMETHING
fi
but how can I apply this to the first line?
I thought to maybe create a variable of the first line and check if it starts with #include
, but I'm not sure how to do this. I tried the read
command but I fail to read into a variable.
I'd like to hear other approaches to this problem; maybe awk?
Anyway, remember, I need to check if the first line starts with #include
, not if it contains that string.
That's why I found those questions: How to print file content only if the first line matches a certain pattern?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5536018/how-to-print-matched-regex-pattern-using-awk
they are not completely helping.
shell grep read
This question already has an answer here:
How to print file content only if the first line matches a certain pattern?
5 answers
I need to write a shell script that find and print all files in a directory which starts with the string: #include
.
Now, I know how to check if a string is in the file, by using:
for f in `ls`; do
if grep -q 'MyString' $f; then:
#DO SOMETHING
fi
but how can I apply this to the first line?
I thought to maybe create a variable of the first line and check if it starts with #include
, but I'm not sure how to do this. I tried the read
command but I fail to read into a variable.
I'd like to hear other approaches to this problem; maybe awk?
Anyway, remember, I need to check if the first line starts with #include
, not if it contains that string.
That's why I found those questions: How to print file content only if the first line matches a certain pattern?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5536018/how-to-print-matched-regex-pattern-using-awk
they are not completely helping.
This question already has an answer here:
How to print file content only if the first line matches a certain pattern?
5 answers
shell grep read
shell grep read
edited Nov 11 at 17:16
Jeff Schaller
37.6k1052121
37.6k1052121
asked Nov 9 at 9:33
Z E Nir
4918
4918
marked as duplicate by don_crissti, elbarna, RalfFriedl, mosvy, G-Man Nov 11 at 23:52
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by don_crissti, elbarna, RalfFriedl, mosvy, G-Man Nov 11 at 23:52
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
5
Tip: don't use ls in scripts, it invariably leads to problems.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:02
I think unix.stackexchange.com/a/232655/117549 is reasonably close -- just anchor the pattern.
– Jeff Schaller
Nov 9 at 11:28
@ctrl-alt-delor so I shall use "in *" instead? no problem... but what kind of problem 'ls' can cause?
– Z E Nir
Nov 10 at 15:55
It is just thatls
is hard to parse, it was not designed for the computer to read, but for humans. It is often used when not needed. There are other tools: just that are designed for the job:*
,find
, …
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 10 at 19:31
@ctrl-alt-delor Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 11 at 9:12
|
show 1 more comment
5
Tip: don't use ls in scripts, it invariably leads to problems.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:02
I think unix.stackexchange.com/a/232655/117549 is reasonably close -- just anchor the pattern.
– Jeff Schaller
Nov 9 at 11:28
@ctrl-alt-delor so I shall use "in *" instead? no problem... but what kind of problem 'ls' can cause?
– Z E Nir
Nov 10 at 15:55
It is just thatls
is hard to parse, it was not designed for the computer to read, but for humans. It is often used when not needed. There are other tools: just that are designed for the job:*
,find
, …
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 10 at 19:31
@ctrl-alt-delor Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 11 at 9:12
5
5
Tip: don't use ls in scripts, it invariably leads to problems.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:02
Tip: don't use ls in scripts, it invariably leads to problems.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:02
I think unix.stackexchange.com/a/232655/117549 is reasonably close -- just anchor the pattern.
– Jeff Schaller
Nov 9 at 11:28
I think unix.stackexchange.com/a/232655/117549 is reasonably close -- just anchor the pattern.
– Jeff Schaller
Nov 9 at 11:28
@ctrl-alt-delor so I shall use "in *" instead? no problem... but what kind of problem 'ls' can cause?
– Z E Nir
Nov 10 at 15:55
@ctrl-alt-delor so I shall use "in *" instead? no problem... but what kind of problem 'ls' can cause?
– Z E Nir
Nov 10 at 15:55
It is just that
ls
is hard to parse, it was not designed for the computer to read, but for humans. It is often used when not needed. There are other tools: just that are designed for the job: *
, find
, …– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 10 at 19:31
It is just that
ls
is hard to parse, it was not designed for the computer to read, but for humans. It is often used when not needed. There are other tools: just that are designed for the job: *
, find
, …– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 10 at 19:31
@ctrl-alt-delor Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 11 at 9:12
@ctrl-alt-delor Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 11 at 9:12
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
It is easy to check if the first line starts with #include
in sed:
sed -n '1/^#include/p;q' file
Or simplified:
sed -n '/^#include/p;q' file
That will have an output only if the file contains #include
in the first line. That only needs to read the first line to make the check, so it will be very fast.
So, a shell loop for all files (with sed) should be like this:
for file in *
do
[ "$(sed -n '/^#include/p;q' "$file")" ] && printf '%sn' "$file"
done
If there are only files (not directories) in the pwd.
If what you need is to print all lines of the file, a solution similar to the first code posted will work:
sed -n '1/^#include/!q;p' file
it prints the name of the file/s, not its content... I just replaced the 'printf' with "cat $file" and it worked! Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:58
@ZENir good idea, have you tried it?
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:04
@ctrl-alt-delor Yes, it seems that he tried it: He have just said: …and it worked!.
– Isaac
Nov 9 at 10:20
Yeah i tried this, thank you both!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 10:24
sorry my bad, I miss-read it as a question.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:25
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
5
down vote
for file in *; do
[ -f "$file" ] || continue
IFS= read -r line < "$file" || [ -n "$line" ] || continue
case $line in
("#include"*) printf '%sn' "$file"
esac
done
To print the content of the file instead of its name, replace the printf
command with cat < "$file"
.
If your awk
supports the nextfile
extension, and you don't care about the potential side effects of opening non-regular files:
awk '/^#include/print substr(FILENAME, 3); nextfile' ./*
With zsh
, you can replace ./*
with ./*(-.)
to only pass regular files (or symlinks to regular files like for the [ -f ... ]
approach above) to awk
.
Or to print the file contents instead of name:
awk 'FNR == 1 found = /^#include/; found' ./*
(that one is portable).
I tried this script, for some reason it does nothing, I have a file starts with '#include' and still nothing printes, If I press 'Enter' nine times i'm returning to the bash
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:53
@ZENir, in my initial version of the script, I had forgotten the< "$file"
. Try reloading the page.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 10:44
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
for file in *
do
[ -f "$file" ] && head -n 1 < "$file" | grep -q '^#include' && cat < "$file"
done
Beware of the fact that, with -q
option enabled, grep
will exit with a zero status even if an error occurred.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This question is a perfect example where bash and sed solutions are quite complex, but the task can be much simpler with (GNU) awk:
gawk 'FNR==1 && /^#include/print FILENAMEnextfile' *
A similar solution has already been given. Yours has issues with file names that contain=
characters. Note that a few otherawk
implementations beside GNUawk
supportnextfile
these days. Here, because you're usingFNR == 1
, it would also work in implementations that don't supportnextfile
.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 17:14
@StéphaneChazelas You're right, I read your answer too fast and didn't notice your awk examples, sorry about that
– user000001
Nov 9 at 18:29
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
It is easy to check if the first line starts with #include
in sed:
sed -n '1/^#include/p;q' file
Or simplified:
sed -n '/^#include/p;q' file
That will have an output only if the file contains #include
in the first line. That only needs to read the first line to make the check, so it will be very fast.
So, a shell loop for all files (with sed) should be like this:
for file in *
do
[ "$(sed -n '/^#include/p;q' "$file")" ] && printf '%sn' "$file"
done
If there are only files (not directories) in the pwd.
If what you need is to print all lines of the file, a solution similar to the first code posted will work:
sed -n '1/^#include/!q;p' file
it prints the name of the file/s, not its content... I just replaced the 'printf' with "cat $file" and it worked! Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:58
@ZENir good idea, have you tried it?
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:04
@ctrl-alt-delor Yes, it seems that he tried it: He have just said: …and it worked!.
– Isaac
Nov 9 at 10:20
Yeah i tried this, thank you both!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 10:24
sorry my bad, I miss-read it as a question.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:25
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
It is easy to check if the first line starts with #include
in sed:
sed -n '1/^#include/p;q' file
Or simplified:
sed -n '/^#include/p;q' file
That will have an output only if the file contains #include
in the first line. That only needs to read the first line to make the check, so it will be very fast.
So, a shell loop for all files (with sed) should be like this:
for file in *
do
[ "$(sed -n '/^#include/p;q' "$file")" ] && printf '%sn' "$file"
done
If there are only files (not directories) in the pwd.
If what you need is to print all lines of the file, a solution similar to the first code posted will work:
sed -n '1/^#include/!q;p' file
it prints the name of the file/s, not its content... I just replaced the 'printf' with "cat $file" and it worked! Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:58
@ZENir good idea, have you tried it?
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:04
@ctrl-alt-delor Yes, it seems that he tried it: He have just said: …and it worked!.
– Isaac
Nov 9 at 10:20
Yeah i tried this, thank you both!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 10:24
sorry my bad, I miss-read it as a question.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:25
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
It is easy to check if the first line starts with #include
in sed:
sed -n '1/^#include/p;q' file
Or simplified:
sed -n '/^#include/p;q' file
That will have an output only if the file contains #include
in the first line. That only needs to read the first line to make the check, so it will be very fast.
So, a shell loop for all files (with sed) should be like this:
for file in *
do
[ "$(sed -n '/^#include/p;q' "$file")" ] && printf '%sn' "$file"
done
If there are only files (not directories) in the pwd.
If what you need is to print all lines of the file, a solution similar to the first code posted will work:
sed -n '1/^#include/!q;p' file
It is easy to check if the first line starts with #include
in sed:
sed -n '1/^#include/p;q' file
Or simplified:
sed -n '/^#include/p;q' file
That will have an output only if the file contains #include
in the first line. That only needs to read the first line to make the check, so it will be very fast.
So, a shell loop for all files (with sed) should be like this:
for file in *
do
[ "$(sed -n '/^#include/p;q' "$file")" ] && printf '%sn' "$file"
done
If there are only files (not directories) in the pwd.
If what you need is to print all lines of the file, a solution similar to the first code posted will work:
sed -n '1/^#include/!q;p' file
edited Nov 10 at 1:54
answered Nov 9 at 9:53
Isaac
10.9k11648
10.9k11648
it prints the name of the file/s, not its content... I just replaced the 'printf' with "cat $file" and it worked! Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:58
@ZENir good idea, have you tried it?
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:04
@ctrl-alt-delor Yes, it seems that he tried it: He have just said: …and it worked!.
– Isaac
Nov 9 at 10:20
Yeah i tried this, thank you both!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 10:24
sorry my bad, I miss-read it as a question.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:25
|
show 1 more comment
it prints the name of the file/s, not its content... I just replaced the 'printf' with "cat $file" and it worked! Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:58
@ZENir good idea, have you tried it?
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:04
@ctrl-alt-delor Yes, it seems that he tried it: He have just said: …and it worked!.
– Isaac
Nov 9 at 10:20
Yeah i tried this, thank you both!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 10:24
sorry my bad, I miss-read it as a question.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:25
it prints the name of the file/s, not its content... I just replaced the 'printf' with "cat $file" and it worked! Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:58
it prints the name of the file/s, not its content... I just replaced the 'printf' with "cat $file" and it worked! Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:58
@ZENir good idea, have you tried it?
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:04
@ZENir good idea, have you tried it?
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:04
@ctrl-alt-delor Yes, it seems that he tried it: He have just said: …and it worked!.
– Isaac
Nov 9 at 10:20
@ctrl-alt-delor Yes, it seems that he tried it: He have just said: …and it worked!.
– Isaac
Nov 9 at 10:20
Yeah i tried this, thank you both!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 10:24
Yeah i tried this, thank you both!
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 10:24
sorry my bad, I miss-read it as a question.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:25
sorry my bad, I miss-read it as a question.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:25
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
5
down vote
for file in *; do
[ -f "$file" ] || continue
IFS= read -r line < "$file" || [ -n "$line" ] || continue
case $line in
("#include"*) printf '%sn' "$file"
esac
done
To print the content of the file instead of its name, replace the printf
command with cat < "$file"
.
If your awk
supports the nextfile
extension, and you don't care about the potential side effects of opening non-regular files:
awk '/^#include/print substr(FILENAME, 3); nextfile' ./*
With zsh
, you can replace ./*
with ./*(-.)
to only pass regular files (or symlinks to regular files like for the [ -f ... ]
approach above) to awk
.
Or to print the file contents instead of name:
awk 'FNR == 1 found = /^#include/; found' ./*
(that one is portable).
I tried this script, for some reason it does nothing, I have a file starts with '#include' and still nothing printes, If I press 'Enter' nine times i'm returning to the bash
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:53
@ZENir, in my initial version of the script, I had forgotten the< "$file"
. Try reloading the page.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 10:44
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
for file in *; do
[ -f "$file" ] || continue
IFS= read -r line < "$file" || [ -n "$line" ] || continue
case $line in
("#include"*) printf '%sn' "$file"
esac
done
To print the content of the file instead of its name, replace the printf
command with cat < "$file"
.
If your awk
supports the nextfile
extension, and you don't care about the potential side effects of opening non-regular files:
awk '/^#include/print substr(FILENAME, 3); nextfile' ./*
With zsh
, you can replace ./*
with ./*(-.)
to only pass regular files (or symlinks to regular files like for the [ -f ... ]
approach above) to awk
.
Or to print the file contents instead of name:
awk 'FNR == 1 found = /^#include/; found' ./*
(that one is portable).
I tried this script, for some reason it does nothing, I have a file starts with '#include' and still nothing printes, If I press 'Enter' nine times i'm returning to the bash
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:53
@ZENir, in my initial version of the script, I had forgotten the< "$file"
. Try reloading the page.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 10:44
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
for file in *; do
[ -f "$file" ] || continue
IFS= read -r line < "$file" || [ -n "$line" ] || continue
case $line in
("#include"*) printf '%sn' "$file"
esac
done
To print the content of the file instead of its name, replace the printf
command with cat < "$file"
.
If your awk
supports the nextfile
extension, and you don't care about the potential side effects of opening non-regular files:
awk '/^#include/print substr(FILENAME, 3); nextfile' ./*
With zsh
, you can replace ./*
with ./*(-.)
to only pass regular files (or symlinks to regular files like for the [ -f ... ]
approach above) to awk
.
Or to print the file contents instead of name:
awk 'FNR == 1 found = /^#include/; found' ./*
(that one is portable).
for file in *; do
[ -f "$file" ] || continue
IFS= read -r line < "$file" || [ -n "$line" ] || continue
case $line in
("#include"*) printf '%sn' "$file"
esac
done
To print the content of the file instead of its name, replace the printf
command with cat < "$file"
.
If your awk
supports the nextfile
extension, and you don't care about the potential side effects of opening non-regular files:
awk '/^#include/print substr(FILENAME, 3); nextfile' ./*
With zsh
, you can replace ./*
with ./*(-.)
to only pass regular files (or symlinks to regular files like for the [ -f ... ]
approach above) to awk
.
Or to print the file contents instead of name:
awk 'FNR == 1 found = /^#include/; found' ./*
(that one is portable).
edited Nov 9 at 10:47
answered Nov 9 at 9:41
Stéphane Chazelas
297k54562907
297k54562907
I tried this script, for some reason it does nothing, I have a file starts with '#include' and still nothing printes, If I press 'Enter' nine times i'm returning to the bash
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:53
@ZENir, in my initial version of the script, I had forgotten the< "$file"
. Try reloading the page.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 10:44
add a comment |
I tried this script, for some reason it does nothing, I have a file starts with '#include' and still nothing printes, If I press 'Enter' nine times i'm returning to the bash
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:53
@ZENir, in my initial version of the script, I had forgotten the< "$file"
. Try reloading the page.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 10:44
I tried this script, for some reason it does nothing, I have a file starts with '#include' and still nothing printes, If I press 'Enter' nine times i'm returning to the bash
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:53
I tried this script, for some reason it does nothing, I have a file starts with '#include' and still nothing printes, If I press 'Enter' nine times i'm returning to the bash
– Z E Nir
Nov 9 at 9:53
@ZENir, in my initial version of the script, I had forgotten the
< "$file"
. Try reloading the page.– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 10:44
@ZENir, in my initial version of the script, I had forgotten the
< "$file"
. Try reloading the page.– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 10:44
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
for file in *
do
[ -f "$file" ] && head -n 1 < "$file" | grep -q '^#include' && cat < "$file"
done
Beware of the fact that, with -q
option enabled, grep
will exit with a zero status even if an error occurred.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
for file in *
do
[ -f "$file" ] && head -n 1 < "$file" | grep -q '^#include' && cat < "$file"
done
Beware of the fact that, with -q
option enabled, grep
will exit with a zero status even if an error occurred.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
for file in *
do
[ -f "$file" ] && head -n 1 < "$file" | grep -q '^#include' && cat < "$file"
done
Beware of the fact that, with -q
option enabled, grep
will exit with a zero status even if an error occurred.
for file in *
do
[ -f "$file" ] && head -n 1 < "$file" | grep -q '^#include' && cat < "$file"
done
Beware of the fact that, with -q
option enabled, grep
will exit with a zero status even if an error occurred.
edited Nov 9 at 12:05
Stéphane Chazelas
297k54562907
297k54562907
answered Nov 9 at 9:56
francescop21
213112
213112
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This question is a perfect example where bash and sed solutions are quite complex, but the task can be much simpler with (GNU) awk:
gawk 'FNR==1 && /^#include/print FILENAMEnextfile' *
A similar solution has already been given. Yours has issues with file names that contain=
characters. Note that a few otherawk
implementations beside GNUawk
supportnextfile
these days. Here, because you're usingFNR == 1
, it would also work in implementations that don't supportnextfile
.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 17:14
@StéphaneChazelas You're right, I read your answer too fast and didn't notice your awk examples, sorry about that
– user000001
Nov 9 at 18:29
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This question is a perfect example where bash and sed solutions are quite complex, but the task can be much simpler with (GNU) awk:
gawk 'FNR==1 && /^#include/print FILENAMEnextfile' *
A similar solution has already been given. Yours has issues with file names that contain=
characters. Note that a few otherawk
implementations beside GNUawk
supportnextfile
these days. Here, because you're usingFNR == 1
, it would also work in implementations that don't supportnextfile
.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 17:14
@StéphaneChazelas You're right, I read your answer too fast and didn't notice your awk examples, sorry about that
– user000001
Nov 9 at 18:29
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
This question is a perfect example where bash and sed solutions are quite complex, but the task can be much simpler with (GNU) awk:
gawk 'FNR==1 && /^#include/print FILENAMEnextfile' *
This question is a perfect example where bash and sed solutions are quite complex, but the task can be much simpler with (GNU) awk:
gawk 'FNR==1 && /^#include/print FILENAMEnextfile' *
answered Nov 9 at 17:04
user000001
842713
842713
A similar solution has already been given. Yours has issues with file names that contain=
characters. Note that a few otherawk
implementations beside GNUawk
supportnextfile
these days. Here, because you're usingFNR == 1
, it would also work in implementations that don't supportnextfile
.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 17:14
@StéphaneChazelas You're right, I read your answer too fast and didn't notice your awk examples, sorry about that
– user000001
Nov 9 at 18:29
add a comment |
A similar solution has already been given. Yours has issues with file names that contain=
characters. Note that a few otherawk
implementations beside GNUawk
supportnextfile
these days. Here, because you're usingFNR == 1
, it would also work in implementations that don't supportnextfile
.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 17:14
@StéphaneChazelas You're right, I read your answer too fast and didn't notice your awk examples, sorry about that
– user000001
Nov 9 at 18:29
A similar solution has already been given. Yours has issues with file names that contain
=
characters. Note that a few other awk
implementations beside GNU awk
support nextfile
these days. Here, because you're using FNR == 1
, it would also work in implementations that don't support nextfile
.– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 17:14
A similar solution has already been given. Yours has issues with file names that contain
=
characters. Note that a few other awk
implementations beside GNU awk
support nextfile
these days. Here, because you're using FNR == 1
, it would also work in implementations that don't support nextfile
.– Stéphane Chazelas
Nov 9 at 17:14
@StéphaneChazelas You're right, I read your answer too fast and didn't notice your awk examples, sorry about that
– user000001
Nov 9 at 18:29
@StéphaneChazelas You're right, I read your answer too fast and didn't notice your awk examples, sorry about that
– user000001
Nov 9 at 18:29
add a comment |
5
Tip: don't use ls in scripts, it invariably leads to problems.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 9 at 10:02
I think unix.stackexchange.com/a/232655/117549 is reasonably close -- just anchor the pattern.
– Jeff Schaller
Nov 9 at 11:28
@ctrl-alt-delor so I shall use "in *" instead? no problem... but what kind of problem 'ls' can cause?
– Z E Nir
Nov 10 at 15:55
It is just that
ls
is hard to parse, it was not designed for the computer to read, but for humans. It is often used when not needed. There are other tools: just that are designed for the job:*
,find
, …– ctrl-alt-delor
Nov 10 at 19:31
@ctrl-alt-delor Thanks!
– Z E Nir
Nov 11 at 9:12