Is there one global visa that lets you enter (almost) any country? [duplicate]










0
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Visas to travel the world

    1 answer



Is there a one visa or any paper that lets you enter (almost) any country in the world? For example, you are trusted and record-free citizen of couple countries and you sign something that makes you allowed to enter (almost) any country.










share|improve this question













marked as duplicate by phoog, chx, Itai, Karlson, Michael Hampton May 17 '16 at 4:34


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • The only way such a system could function would be if there was an unbiased supranational organization to issue such. While there is the UN, it is still subjected to politics and not embraced by all nations.

    – user13044
    May 17 '16 at 2:53











  • You could be Bono. Who's going to refuse Bono?

    – Zach Lipton
    May 17 '16 at 3:13















0
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Visas to travel the world

    1 answer



Is there a one visa or any paper that lets you enter (almost) any country in the world? For example, you are trusted and record-free citizen of couple countries and you sign something that makes you allowed to enter (almost) any country.










share|improve this question













marked as duplicate by phoog, chx, Itai, Karlson, Michael Hampton May 17 '16 at 4:34


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • The only way such a system could function would be if there was an unbiased supranational organization to issue such. While there is the UN, it is still subjected to politics and not embraced by all nations.

    – user13044
    May 17 '16 at 2:53











  • You could be Bono. Who's going to refuse Bono?

    – Zach Lipton
    May 17 '16 at 3:13













0












0








0









This question already has an answer here:



  • Visas to travel the world

    1 answer



Is there a one visa or any paper that lets you enter (almost) any country in the world? For example, you are trusted and record-free citizen of couple countries and you sign something that makes you allowed to enter (almost) any country.










share|improve this question















This question already has an answer here:



  • Visas to travel the world

    1 answer



Is there a one visa or any paper that lets you enter (almost) any country in the world? For example, you are trusted and record-free citizen of couple countries and you sign something that makes you allowed to enter (almost) any country.





This question already has an answer here:



  • Visas to travel the world

    1 answer







visas passports






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 17 '16 at 2:10









KKZiomekKKZiomek

1064




1064




marked as duplicate by phoog, chx, Itai, Karlson, Michael Hampton May 17 '16 at 4:34


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by phoog, chx, Itai, Karlson, Michael Hampton May 17 '16 at 4:34


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • The only way such a system could function would be if there was an unbiased supranational organization to issue such. While there is the UN, it is still subjected to politics and not embraced by all nations.

    – user13044
    May 17 '16 at 2:53











  • You could be Bono. Who's going to refuse Bono?

    – Zach Lipton
    May 17 '16 at 3:13

















  • The only way such a system could function would be if there was an unbiased supranational organization to issue such. While there is the UN, it is still subjected to politics and not embraced by all nations.

    – user13044
    May 17 '16 at 2:53











  • You could be Bono. Who's going to refuse Bono?

    – Zach Lipton
    May 17 '16 at 3:13
















The only way such a system could function would be if there was an unbiased supranational organization to issue such. While there is the UN, it is still subjected to politics and not embraced by all nations.

– user13044
May 17 '16 at 2:53





The only way such a system could function would be if there was an unbiased supranational organization to issue such. While there is the UN, it is still subjected to politics and not embraced by all nations.

– user13044
May 17 '16 at 2:53













You could be Bono. Who's going to refuse Bono?

– Zach Lipton
May 17 '16 at 3:13





You could be Bono. Who's going to refuse Bono?

– Zach Lipton
May 17 '16 at 3:13










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














There is no such visa. Every country has its own entry requirements, which will depend on your citizenship, purpose of your visit, and other criteria. While there are some supranatural agreements (Schengen being the most significant) that grant visa holders access to more than one country, every nation considers its ability to admit and refuse foreigners as an element of its national sovereignty and would be highly unlikely to sign on to some kind of global visa scheme like this.



Now, it is the case that some passports grant more visa-free access than others. Various groups attempt to rank passports based on this, you can see one such ranking at The Passport Index. You'll see that German and Swedish passport holders have visa-free access to much of the world, with many European nations, the US, Canada, Singapore, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand enjoying similar levels of access. As you go down the list, more countries require visas in advance.



However, there are still caveats to such access. Even a mighty German passport-holder still needs to complete the online ETA process to visit Australia. People found ineligible through that process will generally need to obtain a visa to be allowed in. You can argue semantics all day (and diplomats do) about whether Australia's ETA, the US's ESTA, Canada's eTA, etc... are really visas or not, but at the end of the day, they are hoops a traveler has to jump through before they're allowed to travel to a country. Other countries issue a "visa-on-arrival," which can be as simple as a counter where you pay a fee to get a stamp.



Also note that, even with a visa, pretty much every country reserves the right to refuse entry at the border. Visas are also granted for particular purposes and durations of stay. Even though I, as an American, don't need a visa to visit the UK as a tourist, I would need one to get a job there or enroll in a university. In addition, the waiver of a visa requirement doesn't normally waive the need to comply with other parts of immigration law, so you could still be refused on the basis of a criminal record, lack of funds, failure to demonstrate an intent to leave, etc... even though you don't need a visa.



In short, immigration law differs significantly from country to country, and there's no reason any nation would sign onto a universal visa like this. Even if such a thing existed, any country could still refuse you entry based on its own laws.






share|improve this answer






























    1














    I'll bite. A UN passport (indeed, not a visa, but still only one document).






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      Do you mean a UN Laissez Passer? Some countries require those traveling on a UNLP to have a visa. Some countries require the bearer of a UNLP to travel on their national passport. The US, for example, requires bearers of a UNLP traveling on official business to have a visa in the national passport (I suppose they might make an exception for stateless UN employees).

      – phoog
      May 17 '16 at 2:47











    • There are indeed countries that impose more restrictions on UNLP passport-holders than would be the case if they traveled on another passport. It's often the case that countries have stricter rules for visitors on diplomatic or official passports, since such people are not generally acting as standard tourist or business visitors. It's easy for a country to refuse entry to almost anyone, but it can spark a minor international incident to refuse entry to a foreign official, so such things are better worked out through advance notice through each country's foreign services.

      – Zach Lipton
      May 17 '16 at 2:51











    • @ZachLipton in my experience, "advance notice through each country's foreign services" takes the form of a visa application. No doubt at higher levels, there's more to it, but for most staff and officers of the UN and its agencies, there's generally not.

      – phoog
      May 17 '16 at 2:53












    • This does bring up my favorite visa fun fact though, which is that the US is obliged by treaty, as the UN Headquarters host country, to admit basically anyone (usually) who needs to participate in UN business. But they can restrict them from leaving a 25 mile radius from Columbus Circle in New York without prior permission if they're from a country the US isn't particularly fond of.

      – Zach Lipton
      May 17 '16 at 3:00

















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    There is no such visa. Every country has its own entry requirements, which will depend on your citizenship, purpose of your visit, and other criteria. While there are some supranatural agreements (Schengen being the most significant) that grant visa holders access to more than one country, every nation considers its ability to admit and refuse foreigners as an element of its national sovereignty and would be highly unlikely to sign on to some kind of global visa scheme like this.



    Now, it is the case that some passports grant more visa-free access than others. Various groups attempt to rank passports based on this, you can see one such ranking at The Passport Index. You'll see that German and Swedish passport holders have visa-free access to much of the world, with many European nations, the US, Canada, Singapore, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand enjoying similar levels of access. As you go down the list, more countries require visas in advance.



    However, there are still caveats to such access. Even a mighty German passport-holder still needs to complete the online ETA process to visit Australia. People found ineligible through that process will generally need to obtain a visa to be allowed in. You can argue semantics all day (and diplomats do) about whether Australia's ETA, the US's ESTA, Canada's eTA, etc... are really visas or not, but at the end of the day, they are hoops a traveler has to jump through before they're allowed to travel to a country. Other countries issue a "visa-on-arrival," which can be as simple as a counter where you pay a fee to get a stamp.



    Also note that, even with a visa, pretty much every country reserves the right to refuse entry at the border. Visas are also granted for particular purposes and durations of stay. Even though I, as an American, don't need a visa to visit the UK as a tourist, I would need one to get a job there or enroll in a university. In addition, the waiver of a visa requirement doesn't normally waive the need to comply with other parts of immigration law, so you could still be refused on the basis of a criminal record, lack of funds, failure to demonstrate an intent to leave, etc... even though you don't need a visa.



    In short, immigration law differs significantly from country to country, and there's no reason any nation would sign onto a universal visa like this. Even if such a thing existed, any country could still refuse you entry based on its own laws.






    share|improve this answer



























      5














      There is no such visa. Every country has its own entry requirements, which will depend on your citizenship, purpose of your visit, and other criteria. While there are some supranatural agreements (Schengen being the most significant) that grant visa holders access to more than one country, every nation considers its ability to admit and refuse foreigners as an element of its national sovereignty and would be highly unlikely to sign on to some kind of global visa scheme like this.



      Now, it is the case that some passports grant more visa-free access than others. Various groups attempt to rank passports based on this, you can see one such ranking at The Passport Index. You'll see that German and Swedish passport holders have visa-free access to much of the world, with many European nations, the US, Canada, Singapore, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand enjoying similar levels of access. As you go down the list, more countries require visas in advance.



      However, there are still caveats to such access. Even a mighty German passport-holder still needs to complete the online ETA process to visit Australia. People found ineligible through that process will generally need to obtain a visa to be allowed in. You can argue semantics all day (and diplomats do) about whether Australia's ETA, the US's ESTA, Canada's eTA, etc... are really visas or not, but at the end of the day, they are hoops a traveler has to jump through before they're allowed to travel to a country. Other countries issue a "visa-on-arrival," which can be as simple as a counter where you pay a fee to get a stamp.



      Also note that, even with a visa, pretty much every country reserves the right to refuse entry at the border. Visas are also granted for particular purposes and durations of stay. Even though I, as an American, don't need a visa to visit the UK as a tourist, I would need one to get a job there or enroll in a university. In addition, the waiver of a visa requirement doesn't normally waive the need to comply with other parts of immigration law, so you could still be refused on the basis of a criminal record, lack of funds, failure to demonstrate an intent to leave, etc... even though you don't need a visa.



      In short, immigration law differs significantly from country to country, and there's no reason any nation would sign onto a universal visa like this. Even if such a thing existed, any country could still refuse you entry based on its own laws.






      share|improve this answer

























        5












        5








        5







        There is no such visa. Every country has its own entry requirements, which will depend on your citizenship, purpose of your visit, and other criteria. While there are some supranatural agreements (Schengen being the most significant) that grant visa holders access to more than one country, every nation considers its ability to admit and refuse foreigners as an element of its national sovereignty and would be highly unlikely to sign on to some kind of global visa scheme like this.



        Now, it is the case that some passports grant more visa-free access than others. Various groups attempt to rank passports based on this, you can see one such ranking at The Passport Index. You'll see that German and Swedish passport holders have visa-free access to much of the world, with many European nations, the US, Canada, Singapore, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand enjoying similar levels of access. As you go down the list, more countries require visas in advance.



        However, there are still caveats to such access. Even a mighty German passport-holder still needs to complete the online ETA process to visit Australia. People found ineligible through that process will generally need to obtain a visa to be allowed in. You can argue semantics all day (and diplomats do) about whether Australia's ETA, the US's ESTA, Canada's eTA, etc... are really visas or not, but at the end of the day, they are hoops a traveler has to jump through before they're allowed to travel to a country. Other countries issue a "visa-on-arrival," which can be as simple as a counter where you pay a fee to get a stamp.



        Also note that, even with a visa, pretty much every country reserves the right to refuse entry at the border. Visas are also granted for particular purposes and durations of stay. Even though I, as an American, don't need a visa to visit the UK as a tourist, I would need one to get a job there or enroll in a university. In addition, the waiver of a visa requirement doesn't normally waive the need to comply with other parts of immigration law, so you could still be refused on the basis of a criminal record, lack of funds, failure to demonstrate an intent to leave, etc... even though you don't need a visa.



        In short, immigration law differs significantly from country to country, and there's no reason any nation would sign onto a universal visa like this. Even if such a thing existed, any country could still refuse you entry based on its own laws.






        share|improve this answer













        There is no such visa. Every country has its own entry requirements, which will depend on your citizenship, purpose of your visit, and other criteria. While there are some supranatural agreements (Schengen being the most significant) that grant visa holders access to more than one country, every nation considers its ability to admit and refuse foreigners as an element of its national sovereignty and would be highly unlikely to sign on to some kind of global visa scheme like this.



        Now, it is the case that some passports grant more visa-free access than others. Various groups attempt to rank passports based on this, you can see one such ranking at The Passport Index. You'll see that German and Swedish passport holders have visa-free access to much of the world, with many European nations, the US, Canada, Singapore, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand enjoying similar levels of access. As you go down the list, more countries require visas in advance.



        However, there are still caveats to such access. Even a mighty German passport-holder still needs to complete the online ETA process to visit Australia. People found ineligible through that process will generally need to obtain a visa to be allowed in. You can argue semantics all day (and diplomats do) about whether Australia's ETA, the US's ESTA, Canada's eTA, etc... are really visas or not, but at the end of the day, they are hoops a traveler has to jump through before they're allowed to travel to a country. Other countries issue a "visa-on-arrival," which can be as simple as a counter where you pay a fee to get a stamp.



        Also note that, even with a visa, pretty much every country reserves the right to refuse entry at the border. Visas are also granted for particular purposes and durations of stay. Even though I, as an American, don't need a visa to visit the UK as a tourist, I would need one to get a job there or enroll in a university. In addition, the waiver of a visa requirement doesn't normally waive the need to comply with other parts of immigration law, so you could still be refused on the basis of a criminal record, lack of funds, failure to demonstrate an intent to leave, etc... even though you don't need a visa.



        In short, immigration law differs significantly from country to country, and there's no reason any nation would sign onto a universal visa like this. Even if such a thing existed, any country could still refuse you entry based on its own laws.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 17 '16 at 2:36









        Zach LiptonZach Lipton

        61.6k11187247




        61.6k11187247























            1














            I'll bite. A UN passport (indeed, not a visa, but still only one document).






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              Do you mean a UN Laissez Passer? Some countries require those traveling on a UNLP to have a visa. Some countries require the bearer of a UNLP to travel on their national passport. The US, for example, requires bearers of a UNLP traveling on official business to have a visa in the national passport (I suppose they might make an exception for stateless UN employees).

              – phoog
              May 17 '16 at 2:47











            • There are indeed countries that impose more restrictions on UNLP passport-holders than would be the case if they traveled on another passport. It's often the case that countries have stricter rules for visitors on diplomatic or official passports, since such people are not generally acting as standard tourist or business visitors. It's easy for a country to refuse entry to almost anyone, but it can spark a minor international incident to refuse entry to a foreign official, so such things are better worked out through advance notice through each country's foreign services.

              – Zach Lipton
              May 17 '16 at 2:51











            • @ZachLipton in my experience, "advance notice through each country's foreign services" takes the form of a visa application. No doubt at higher levels, there's more to it, but for most staff and officers of the UN and its agencies, there's generally not.

              – phoog
              May 17 '16 at 2:53












            • This does bring up my favorite visa fun fact though, which is that the US is obliged by treaty, as the UN Headquarters host country, to admit basically anyone (usually) who needs to participate in UN business. But they can restrict them from leaving a 25 mile radius from Columbus Circle in New York without prior permission if they're from a country the US isn't particularly fond of.

              – Zach Lipton
              May 17 '16 at 3:00















            1














            I'll bite. A UN passport (indeed, not a visa, but still only one document).






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              Do you mean a UN Laissez Passer? Some countries require those traveling on a UNLP to have a visa. Some countries require the bearer of a UNLP to travel on their national passport. The US, for example, requires bearers of a UNLP traveling on official business to have a visa in the national passport (I suppose they might make an exception for stateless UN employees).

              – phoog
              May 17 '16 at 2:47











            • There are indeed countries that impose more restrictions on UNLP passport-holders than would be the case if they traveled on another passport. It's often the case that countries have stricter rules for visitors on diplomatic or official passports, since such people are not generally acting as standard tourist or business visitors. It's easy for a country to refuse entry to almost anyone, but it can spark a minor international incident to refuse entry to a foreign official, so such things are better worked out through advance notice through each country's foreign services.

              – Zach Lipton
              May 17 '16 at 2:51











            • @ZachLipton in my experience, "advance notice through each country's foreign services" takes the form of a visa application. No doubt at higher levels, there's more to it, but for most staff and officers of the UN and its agencies, there's generally not.

              – phoog
              May 17 '16 at 2:53












            • This does bring up my favorite visa fun fact though, which is that the US is obliged by treaty, as the UN Headquarters host country, to admit basically anyone (usually) who needs to participate in UN business. But they can restrict them from leaving a 25 mile radius from Columbus Circle in New York without prior permission if they're from a country the US isn't particularly fond of.

              – Zach Lipton
              May 17 '16 at 3:00













            1












            1








            1







            I'll bite. A UN passport (indeed, not a visa, but still only one document).






            share|improve this answer













            I'll bite. A UN passport (indeed, not a visa, but still only one document).







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 17 '16 at 2:26









            MastaBabaMastaBaba

            19.4k5078




            19.4k5078







            • 1





              Do you mean a UN Laissez Passer? Some countries require those traveling on a UNLP to have a visa. Some countries require the bearer of a UNLP to travel on their national passport. The US, for example, requires bearers of a UNLP traveling on official business to have a visa in the national passport (I suppose they might make an exception for stateless UN employees).

              – phoog
              May 17 '16 at 2:47











            • There are indeed countries that impose more restrictions on UNLP passport-holders than would be the case if they traveled on another passport. It's often the case that countries have stricter rules for visitors on diplomatic or official passports, since such people are not generally acting as standard tourist or business visitors. It's easy for a country to refuse entry to almost anyone, but it can spark a minor international incident to refuse entry to a foreign official, so such things are better worked out through advance notice through each country's foreign services.

              – Zach Lipton
              May 17 '16 at 2:51











            • @ZachLipton in my experience, "advance notice through each country's foreign services" takes the form of a visa application. No doubt at higher levels, there's more to it, but for most staff and officers of the UN and its agencies, there's generally not.

              – phoog
              May 17 '16 at 2:53












            • This does bring up my favorite visa fun fact though, which is that the US is obliged by treaty, as the UN Headquarters host country, to admit basically anyone (usually) who needs to participate in UN business. But they can restrict them from leaving a 25 mile radius from Columbus Circle in New York without prior permission if they're from a country the US isn't particularly fond of.

              – Zach Lipton
              May 17 '16 at 3:00












            • 1





              Do you mean a UN Laissez Passer? Some countries require those traveling on a UNLP to have a visa. Some countries require the bearer of a UNLP to travel on their national passport. The US, for example, requires bearers of a UNLP traveling on official business to have a visa in the national passport (I suppose they might make an exception for stateless UN employees).

              – phoog
              May 17 '16 at 2:47











            • There are indeed countries that impose more restrictions on UNLP passport-holders than would be the case if they traveled on another passport. It's often the case that countries have stricter rules for visitors on diplomatic or official passports, since such people are not generally acting as standard tourist or business visitors. It's easy for a country to refuse entry to almost anyone, but it can spark a minor international incident to refuse entry to a foreign official, so such things are better worked out through advance notice through each country's foreign services.

              – Zach Lipton
              May 17 '16 at 2:51











            • @ZachLipton in my experience, "advance notice through each country's foreign services" takes the form of a visa application. No doubt at higher levels, there's more to it, but for most staff and officers of the UN and its agencies, there's generally not.

              – phoog
              May 17 '16 at 2:53












            • This does bring up my favorite visa fun fact though, which is that the US is obliged by treaty, as the UN Headquarters host country, to admit basically anyone (usually) who needs to participate in UN business. But they can restrict them from leaving a 25 mile radius from Columbus Circle in New York without prior permission if they're from a country the US isn't particularly fond of.

              – Zach Lipton
              May 17 '16 at 3:00







            1




            1





            Do you mean a UN Laissez Passer? Some countries require those traveling on a UNLP to have a visa. Some countries require the bearer of a UNLP to travel on their national passport. The US, for example, requires bearers of a UNLP traveling on official business to have a visa in the national passport (I suppose they might make an exception for stateless UN employees).

            – phoog
            May 17 '16 at 2:47





            Do you mean a UN Laissez Passer? Some countries require those traveling on a UNLP to have a visa. Some countries require the bearer of a UNLP to travel on their national passport. The US, for example, requires bearers of a UNLP traveling on official business to have a visa in the national passport (I suppose they might make an exception for stateless UN employees).

            – phoog
            May 17 '16 at 2:47













            There are indeed countries that impose more restrictions on UNLP passport-holders than would be the case if they traveled on another passport. It's often the case that countries have stricter rules for visitors on diplomatic or official passports, since such people are not generally acting as standard tourist or business visitors. It's easy for a country to refuse entry to almost anyone, but it can spark a minor international incident to refuse entry to a foreign official, so such things are better worked out through advance notice through each country's foreign services.

            – Zach Lipton
            May 17 '16 at 2:51





            There are indeed countries that impose more restrictions on UNLP passport-holders than would be the case if they traveled on another passport. It's often the case that countries have stricter rules for visitors on diplomatic or official passports, since such people are not generally acting as standard tourist or business visitors. It's easy for a country to refuse entry to almost anyone, but it can spark a minor international incident to refuse entry to a foreign official, so such things are better worked out through advance notice through each country's foreign services.

            – Zach Lipton
            May 17 '16 at 2:51













            @ZachLipton in my experience, "advance notice through each country's foreign services" takes the form of a visa application. No doubt at higher levels, there's more to it, but for most staff and officers of the UN and its agencies, there's generally not.

            – phoog
            May 17 '16 at 2:53






            @ZachLipton in my experience, "advance notice through each country's foreign services" takes the form of a visa application. No doubt at higher levels, there's more to it, but for most staff and officers of the UN and its agencies, there's generally not.

            – phoog
            May 17 '16 at 2:53














            This does bring up my favorite visa fun fact though, which is that the US is obliged by treaty, as the UN Headquarters host country, to admit basically anyone (usually) who needs to participate in UN business. But they can restrict them from leaving a 25 mile radius from Columbus Circle in New York without prior permission if they're from a country the US isn't particularly fond of.

            – Zach Lipton
            May 17 '16 at 3:00





            This does bring up my favorite visa fun fact though, which is that the US is obliged by treaty, as the UN Headquarters host country, to admit basically anyone (usually) who needs to participate in UN business. But they can restrict them from leaving a 25 mile radius from Columbus Circle in New York without prior permission if they're from a country the US isn't particularly fond of.

            – Zach Lipton
            May 17 '16 at 3:00



            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            Edmonton

            Crossroads (UK TV series)