How do I fix the speed of a generator?
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
If I need to generate power at a specified frequency, then I need to make sure that the rotor of the generator rotates at a specified speed (rpm). But when I am rotating it with steam or water how do I control this speed? It seems to me that the mechanical forces that rotate the generator somehow has to balance to achieve this. How exactly is this done?
electric-machine
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
If I need to generate power at a specified frequency, then I need to make sure that the rotor of the generator rotates at a specified speed (rpm). But when I am rotating it with steam or water how do I control this speed? It seems to me that the mechanical forces that rotate the generator somehow has to balance to achieve this. How exactly is this done?
electric-machine
4
With some sort of throttle on the prime mover, adjusted so that power in equals power out (plus internal losses).
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 8 at 13:35
7
I'm pretty sure that large generators attached to mains are forced into synchronicity by the influence of all the other things attached to mains; if the generator slows down any, there would be a motor torque applied by the mains power pulling it back towards synchronous speed, and likewise if it speeds up. This is a problem in itself rather than a solution, though, because if your generator starts running as a motor it's likely to tear itself or things attached to its shaft apart; it's not made to operate like that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:41
2
Wasn't the flyball governor on Watt's steam engine essentially doing this through mechanical feedback?
– DaveInCaz
Nov 8 at 17:58
The faster the generator tries to spin, the more current you could draw from it to make it slow back down. That requires a variable load of course.
– immibis
Nov 9 at 0:58
1
This is awfully broad for a question. In sum, your options are to either vary the incoming power, vary the load, or forget about frequency regulation altogether and do something else (use a DC load, a load which doesn't care about frequency, or use a frequency transformer). I don't think it's possible to reasonably pick an option given that you disclosed zero information about your system.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
Nov 9 at 8:25
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
If I need to generate power at a specified frequency, then I need to make sure that the rotor of the generator rotates at a specified speed (rpm). But when I am rotating it with steam or water how do I control this speed? It seems to me that the mechanical forces that rotate the generator somehow has to balance to achieve this. How exactly is this done?
electric-machine
If I need to generate power at a specified frequency, then I need to make sure that the rotor of the generator rotates at a specified speed (rpm). But when I am rotating it with steam or water how do I control this speed? It seems to me that the mechanical forces that rotate the generator somehow has to balance to achieve this. How exactly is this done?
electric-machine
electric-machine
asked Nov 8 at 13:30
praveen kr
1715
1715
4
With some sort of throttle on the prime mover, adjusted so that power in equals power out (plus internal losses).
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 8 at 13:35
7
I'm pretty sure that large generators attached to mains are forced into synchronicity by the influence of all the other things attached to mains; if the generator slows down any, there would be a motor torque applied by the mains power pulling it back towards synchronous speed, and likewise if it speeds up. This is a problem in itself rather than a solution, though, because if your generator starts running as a motor it's likely to tear itself or things attached to its shaft apart; it's not made to operate like that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:41
2
Wasn't the flyball governor on Watt's steam engine essentially doing this through mechanical feedback?
– DaveInCaz
Nov 8 at 17:58
The faster the generator tries to spin, the more current you could draw from it to make it slow back down. That requires a variable load of course.
– immibis
Nov 9 at 0:58
1
This is awfully broad for a question. In sum, your options are to either vary the incoming power, vary the load, or forget about frequency regulation altogether and do something else (use a DC load, a load which doesn't care about frequency, or use a frequency transformer). I don't think it's possible to reasonably pick an option given that you disclosed zero information about your system.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
Nov 9 at 8:25
add a comment |
4
With some sort of throttle on the prime mover, adjusted so that power in equals power out (plus internal losses).
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 8 at 13:35
7
I'm pretty sure that large generators attached to mains are forced into synchronicity by the influence of all the other things attached to mains; if the generator slows down any, there would be a motor torque applied by the mains power pulling it back towards synchronous speed, and likewise if it speeds up. This is a problem in itself rather than a solution, though, because if your generator starts running as a motor it's likely to tear itself or things attached to its shaft apart; it's not made to operate like that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:41
2
Wasn't the flyball governor on Watt's steam engine essentially doing this through mechanical feedback?
– DaveInCaz
Nov 8 at 17:58
The faster the generator tries to spin, the more current you could draw from it to make it slow back down. That requires a variable load of course.
– immibis
Nov 9 at 0:58
1
This is awfully broad for a question. In sum, your options are to either vary the incoming power, vary the load, or forget about frequency regulation altogether and do something else (use a DC load, a load which doesn't care about frequency, or use a frequency transformer). I don't think it's possible to reasonably pick an option given that you disclosed zero information about your system.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
Nov 9 at 8:25
4
4
With some sort of throttle on the prime mover, adjusted so that power in equals power out (plus internal losses).
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 8 at 13:35
With some sort of throttle on the prime mover, adjusted so that power in equals power out (plus internal losses).
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 8 at 13:35
7
7
I'm pretty sure that large generators attached to mains are forced into synchronicity by the influence of all the other things attached to mains; if the generator slows down any, there would be a motor torque applied by the mains power pulling it back towards synchronous speed, and likewise if it speeds up. This is a problem in itself rather than a solution, though, because if your generator starts running as a motor it's likely to tear itself or things attached to its shaft apart; it's not made to operate like that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:41
I'm pretty sure that large generators attached to mains are forced into synchronicity by the influence of all the other things attached to mains; if the generator slows down any, there would be a motor torque applied by the mains power pulling it back towards synchronous speed, and likewise if it speeds up. This is a problem in itself rather than a solution, though, because if your generator starts running as a motor it's likely to tear itself or things attached to its shaft apart; it's not made to operate like that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:41
2
2
Wasn't the flyball governor on Watt's steam engine essentially doing this through mechanical feedback?
– DaveInCaz
Nov 8 at 17:58
Wasn't the flyball governor on Watt's steam engine essentially doing this through mechanical feedback?
– DaveInCaz
Nov 8 at 17:58
The faster the generator tries to spin, the more current you could draw from it to make it slow back down. That requires a variable load of course.
– immibis
Nov 9 at 0:58
The faster the generator tries to spin, the more current you could draw from it to make it slow back down. That requires a variable load of course.
– immibis
Nov 9 at 0:58
1
1
This is awfully broad for a question. In sum, your options are to either vary the incoming power, vary the load, or forget about frequency regulation altogether and do something else (use a DC load, a load which doesn't care about frequency, or use a frequency transformer). I don't think it's possible to reasonably pick an option given that you disclosed zero information about your system.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
Nov 9 at 8:25
This is awfully broad for a question. In sum, your options are to either vary the incoming power, vary the load, or forget about frequency regulation altogether and do something else (use a DC load, a load which doesn't care about frequency, or use a frequency transformer). I don't think it's possible to reasonably pick an option given that you disclosed zero information about your system.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
Nov 9 at 8:25
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Electrically
Some systems do this electrically. The generator either generates DC, or the variable-frequency AC is rectified to make DC, and then an inverter makes the desired AC frequency. Common on more modern small wind turbines.
Mechanically
Other systems are mechanically controlled to get the desired frequency. The mechanism used would be called a governor. Most simple mechanical governors are not very accurate, so this would not be good enough for a grid connected device. It is also possible to make more accurate governors which work mechanically in a similar way to the paragraph below, these are commonly used on internal combustion engines.
With Feedback
Another approach, and probably the most common is to have some form of feedback. A microcontroller monitors the frequency being generated, and adjusts the mechanical system via some form of servo to get the right frequency. For example, it could open and close a sluice gate to adjust the water flow through a turbine. A more complicated system could adjust both a sluice gate and the turbine blades to keep the correct frequency while also varying the output power.
Grid Synchronous operation
In some cases, it might not be necessary at all. If you have a small wind turbine, connected to the mains grid near a coal power station, you could just hook it up and forget about it. The huge turbines in the power station will stabilise the grid frequency, and fix the rotation speed of the wind turbine. If the wind blows harder, you'll just get more current, and a slight power factor shift. Note that as more and more wind turbines get added, the folks who run the power station will get less and less happy about this, so the grid operator will eventually ban it.
5
It's probably worth mentioning doubly-fed induction machines here. They use an induction machine simultaneously as both a generator and a rotary converter to keep the output frequency constant with varying input frequencies.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:45
@Felthry I didn't include them because I'm not sufficiently familiar with them. Feel free to propose an edit though.
– Jack B
Nov 8 at 13:47
1
I would, but Andy's answer already takes care of that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 14:11
Perhaps worth noting that in practice, multiple/many of these will be happening at the same time. Grid upsets will initially cause weird power flows/factors, feedback systems will respond after some delay, coarse level governors will apply/remove brakes if needed.
– mbrig
Nov 8 at 17:07
Small typo: inverted (inverter) makes the desired AC frequency
– Hanky Panky
Nov 9 at 8:16
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
If I need to generate power at a specified frequency, then I need to
make sure that the rotor of the generator rotates at a specified speed
(rpm).
No, that is not necessarily true. A lot of wind generators use a doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) and that can regulate frequency by controlling the rotor winding: -
They can convert power at one frequency to another frequency i.e. they can produce 50/60 Hz even though the rotor may be running too slowly. This is done by injection of an AC current into the rotor coils. The control system that acheives this may also be able to alter pitch angle of the turbine as another means of increasing or decreasing mechanical rotation speed.
For more information please read this EE answer.
But when I am rotating it with steam or water how do I control this
speed?
There can be situations when there is too much rotational speed and although the DFIG can deal with this it is best to have a combined approach such as the pitch angle control shown in the above picture.
However, the inevitable bottom line is that if you have a plentiful source of mechanical energy and very little load demand at that moment, then you have to un-hook the generator from the grid. If you don't "have" a grid, then you have to have a back-up supply that can supply the low power demand and this usually means a diesel generator or solar power via an inverter.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
That is what a governor is for.
The mechanical version is a device that will use centrifugal force or a blower to actuate the throttle/intake to slow down the engine when the speed climbs too much.
You can make it electronic with an RPM sensor and a electronically controlled throttle/intake.
1
Mechanically throttling the input with a brake generates heat and wastes input power....
– rackandboneman
Nov 8 at 20:12
2
@rackandboneman he isn't talking about that, and that's not how governors work.
– Harper
Nov 8 at 21:23
1
@Harper to be fair some governors do work by using braking however for generators you would be adjusting the mechanical energy generated instead of wasting it.
– ratchet freak
Nov 9 at 1:27
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
In my (limited) experience of generator design, you have to look at multiple factors:
Speed of mechanical input (turbine, wheel etc)
Power of mechanical input
Output voltage
Output current
Output power (which depends on voltage and current, but you usually want to maximise this, at a peak power point)
In many cases what you want to maintain is a constant voltage output, which will vary with the electrical load; higher current would make the output drop.
In your set up, you only care about the speed of the shaft (for whatever reason that is). There are two ways to do this: control input power or control output power.
If you know that your mechanical power will always be more than the output power, you could use a governor or similar, which will limit the shaft power to keep the speed constant. This will control the input power in a simple manner.
If you can't guarantee that your mechanical input is higher, you'll need to limit your output power in some way. I have done it where we controlled the output current via a PID feedback controller to keep the shaft speed at fixed values. But that was in a DC system, where we had a large battery to push the current into during high supply times, and draw from during lower supply times.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This isn't the way it is done, but it's a way it could be done: vary the load in order to modulate the speed.
You can imagine a (potentially very large) auxiliary load bank in addition to the normal load, with the input power source sized so that it will provide at least enough power for the normal load under all conditions. This isn't completely unthinkable for hydro setups, since the head is the usual determinant. Then, as the load and the input vary, the auxilliary bank is controlled so that the total demand on the generator produces mechanical loading on the input which maintains the output frequency at the desired point.
And no, this isn't a serious suggestion, but it could be done.
So the auxiliary bank could be used to pump some water back uphill? Sounds stupid, but isn't that the same as charging a battery?
– amI
Nov 8 at 19:01
@amI: It's similar, but pumped-storage hydroelectricity is a smart choice because it costs far less than the batteries that would be required to store the same amount of energy.
– davidcary
Nov 8 at 23:56
Storage is good, but you would never power a battery charger off the battery itself (pump hydro using hydro power). I guess the aux load would need to be a 'controlled' customer (that is willing to accept <100% duty).
– amI
Nov 9 at 6:13
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Electrically
Some systems do this electrically. The generator either generates DC, or the variable-frequency AC is rectified to make DC, and then an inverter makes the desired AC frequency. Common on more modern small wind turbines.
Mechanically
Other systems are mechanically controlled to get the desired frequency. The mechanism used would be called a governor. Most simple mechanical governors are not very accurate, so this would not be good enough for a grid connected device. It is also possible to make more accurate governors which work mechanically in a similar way to the paragraph below, these are commonly used on internal combustion engines.
With Feedback
Another approach, and probably the most common is to have some form of feedback. A microcontroller monitors the frequency being generated, and adjusts the mechanical system via some form of servo to get the right frequency. For example, it could open and close a sluice gate to adjust the water flow through a turbine. A more complicated system could adjust both a sluice gate and the turbine blades to keep the correct frequency while also varying the output power.
Grid Synchronous operation
In some cases, it might not be necessary at all. If you have a small wind turbine, connected to the mains grid near a coal power station, you could just hook it up and forget about it. The huge turbines in the power station will stabilise the grid frequency, and fix the rotation speed of the wind turbine. If the wind blows harder, you'll just get more current, and a slight power factor shift. Note that as more and more wind turbines get added, the folks who run the power station will get less and less happy about this, so the grid operator will eventually ban it.
5
It's probably worth mentioning doubly-fed induction machines here. They use an induction machine simultaneously as both a generator and a rotary converter to keep the output frequency constant with varying input frequencies.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:45
@Felthry I didn't include them because I'm not sufficiently familiar with them. Feel free to propose an edit though.
– Jack B
Nov 8 at 13:47
1
I would, but Andy's answer already takes care of that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 14:11
Perhaps worth noting that in practice, multiple/many of these will be happening at the same time. Grid upsets will initially cause weird power flows/factors, feedback systems will respond after some delay, coarse level governors will apply/remove brakes if needed.
– mbrig
Nov 8 at 17:07
Small typo: inverted (inverter) makes the desired AC frequency
– Hanky Panky
Nov 9 at 8:16
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Electrically
Some systems do this electrically. The generator either generates DC, or the variable-frequency AC is rectified to make DC, and then an inverter makes the desired AC frequency. Common on more modern small wind turbines.
Mechanically
Other systems are mechanically controlled to get the desired frequency. The mechanism used would be called a governor. Most simple mechanical governors are not very accurate, so this would not be good enough for a grid connected device. It is also possible to make more accurate governors which work mechanically in a similar way to the paragraph below, these are commonly used on internal combustion engines.
With Feedback
Another approach, and probably the most common is to have some form of feedback. A microcontroller monitors the frequency being generated, and adjusts the mechanical system via some form of servo to get the right frequency. For example, it could open and close a sluice gate to adjust the water flow through a turbine. A more complicated system could adjust both a sluice gate and the turbine blades to keep the correct frequency while also varying the output power.
Grid Synchronous operation
In some cases, it might not be necessary at all. If you have a small wind turbine, connected to the mains grid near a coal power station, you could just hook it up and forget about it. The huge turbines in the power station will stabilise the grid frequency, and fix the rotation speed of the wind turbine. If the wind blows harder, you'll just get more current, and a slight power factor shift. Note that as more and more wind turbines get added, the folks who run the power station will get less and less happy about this, so the grid operator will eventually ban it.
5
It's probably worth mentioning doubly-fed induction machines here. They use an induction machine simultaneously as both a generator and a rotary converter to keep the output frequency constant with varying input frequencies.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:45
@Felthry I didn't include them because I'm not sufficiently familiar with them. Feel free to propose an edit though.
– Jack B
Nov 8 at 13:47
1
I would, but Andy's answer already takes care of that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 14:11
Perhaps worth noting that in practice, multiple/many of these will be happening at the same time. Grid upsets will initially cause weird power flows/factors, feedback systems will respond after some delay, coarse level governors will apply/remove brakes if needed.
– mbrig
Nov 8 at 17:07
Small typo: inverted (inverter) makes the desired AC frequency
– Hanky Panky
Nov 9 at 8:16
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Electrically
Some systems do this electrically. The generator either generates DC, or the variable-frequency AC is rectified to make DC, and then an inverter makes the desired AC frequency. Common on more modern small wind turbines.
Mechanically
Other systems are mechanically controlled to get the desired frequency. The mechanism used would be called a governor. Most simple mechanical governors are not very accurate, so this would not be good enough for a grid connected device. It is also possible to make more accurate governors which work mechanically in a similar way to the paragraph below, these are commonly used on internal combustion engines.
With Feedback
Another approach, and probably the most common is to have some form of feedback. A microcontroller monitors the frequency being generated, and adjusts the mechanical system via some form of servo to get the right frequency. For example, it could open and close a sluice gate to adjust the water flow through a turbine. A more complicated system could adjust both a sluice gate and the turbine blades to keep the correct frequency while also varying the output power.
Grid Synchronous operation
In some cases, it might not be necessary at all. If you have a small wind turbine, connected to the mains grid near a coal power station, you could just hook it up and forget about it. The huge turbines in the power station will stabilise the grid frequency, and fix the rotation speed of the wind turbine. If the wind blows harder, you'll just get more current, and a slight power factor shift. Note that as more and more wind turbines get added, the folks who run the power station will get less and less happy about this, so the grid operator will eventually ban it.
Electrically
Some systems do this electrically. The generator either generates DC, or the variable-frequency AC is rectified to make DC, and then an inverter makes the desired AC frequency. Common on more modern small wind turbines.
Mechanically
Other systems are mechanically controlled to get the desired frequency. The mechanism used would be called a governor. Most simple mechanical governors are not very accurate, so this would not be good enough for a grid connected device. It is also possible to make more accurate governors which work mechanically in a similar way to the paragraph below, these are commonly used on internal combustion engines.
With Feedback
Another approach, and probably the most common is to have some form of feedback. A microcontroller monitors the frequency being generated, and adjusts the mechanical system via some form of servo to get the right frequency. For example, it could open and close a sluice gate to adjust the water flow through a turbine. A more complicated system could adjust both a sluice gate and the turbine blades to keep the correct frequency while also varying the output power.
Grid Synchronous operation
In some cases, it might not be necessary at all. If you have a small wind turbine, connected to the mains grid near a coal power station, you could just hook it up and forget about it. The huge turbines in the power station will stabilise the grid frequency, and fix the rotation speed of the wind turbine. If the wind blows harder, you'll just get more current, and a slight power factor shift. Note that as more and more wind turbines get added, the folks who run the power station will get less and less happy about this, so the grid operator will eventually ban it.
edited Nov 11 at 20:54
answered Nov 8 at 13:41
Jack B
9,92112137
9,92112137
5
It's probably worth mentioning doubly-fed induction machines here. They use an induction machine simultaneously as both a generator and a rotary converter to keep the output frequency constant with varying input frequencies.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:45
@Felthry I didn't include them because I'm not sufficiently familiar with them. Feel free to propose an edit though.
– Jack B
Nov 8 at 13:47
1
I would, but Andy's answer already takes care of that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 14:11
Perhaps worth noting that in practice, multiple/many of these will be happening at the same time. Grid upsets will initially cause weird power flows/factors, feedback systems will respond after some delay, coarse level governors will apply/remove brakes if needed.
– mbrig
Nov 8 at 17:07
Small typo: inverted (inverter) makes the desired AC frequency
– Hanky Panky
Nov 9 at 8:16
add a comment |
5
It's probably worth mentioning doubly-fed induction machines here. They use an induction machine simultaneously as both a generator and a rotary converter to keep the output frequency constant with varying input frequencies.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:45
@Felthry I didn't include them because I'm not sufficiently familiar with them. Feel free to propose an edit though.
– Jack B
Nov 8 at 13:47
1
I would, but Andy's answer already takes care of that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 14:11
Perhaps worth noting that in practice, multiple/many of these will be happening at the same time. Grid upsets will initially cause weird power flows/factors, feedback systems will respond after some delay, coarse level governors will apply/remove brakes if needed.
– mbrig
Nov 8 at 17:07
Small typo: inverted (inverter) makes the desired AC frequency
– Hanky Panky
Nov 9 at 8:16
5
5
It's probably worth mentioning doubly-fed induction machines here. They use an induction machine simultaneously as both a generator and a rotary converter to keep the output frequency constant with varying input frequencies.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:45
It's probably worth mentioning doubly-fed induction machines here. They use an induction machine simultaneously as both a generator and a rotary converter to keep the output frequency constant with varying input frequencies.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:45
@Felthry I didn't include them because I'm not sufficiently familiar with them. Feel free to propose an edit though.
– Jack B
Nov 8 at 13:47
@Felthry I didn't include them because I'm not sufficiently familiar with them. Feel free to propose an edit though.
– Jack B
Nov 8 at 13:47
1
1
I would, but Andy's answer already takes care of that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 14:11
I would, but Andy's answer already takes care of that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 14:11
Perhaps worth noting that in practice, multiple/many of these will be happening at the same time. Grid upsets will initially cause weird power flows/factors, feedback systems will respond after some delay, coarse level governors will apply/remove brakes if needed.
– mbrig
Nov 8 at 17:07
Perhaps worth noting that in practice, multiple/many of these will be happening at the same time. Grid upsets will initially cause weird power flows/factors, feedback systems will respond after some delay, coarse level governors will apply/remove brakes if needed.
– mbrig
Nov 8 at 17:07
Small typo: inverted (inverter) makes the desired AC frequency
– Hanky Panky
Nov 9 at 8:16
Small typo: inverted (inverter) makes the desired AC frequency
– Hanky Panky
Nov 9 at 8:16
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
If I need to generate power at a specified frequency, then I need to
make sure that the rotor of the generator rotates at a specified speed
(rpm).
No, that is not necessarily true. A lot of wind generators use a doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) and that can regulate frequency by controlling the rotor winding: -
They can convert power at one frequency to another frequency i.e. they can produce 50/60 Hz even though the rotor may be running too slowly. This is done by injection of an AC current into the rotor coils. The control system that acheives this may also be able to alter pitch angle of the turbine as another means of increasing or decreasing mechanical rotation speed.
For more information please read this EE answer.
But when I am rotating it with steam or water how do I control this
speed?
There can be situations when there is too much rotational speed and although the DFIG can deal with this it is best to have a combined approach such as the pitch angle control shown in the above picture.
However, the inevitable bottom line is that if you have a plentiful source of mechanical energy and very little load demand at that moment, then you have to un-hook the generator from the grid. If you don't "have" a grid, then you have to have a back-up supply that can supply the low power demand and this usually means a diesel generator or solar power via an inverter.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
If I need to generate power at a specified frequency, then I need to
make sure that the rotor of the generator rotates at a specified speed
(rpm).
No, that is not necessarily true. A lot of wind generators use a doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) and that can regulate frequency by controlling the rotor winding: -
They can convert power at one frequency to another frequency i.e. they can produce 50/60 Hz even though the rotor may be running too slowly. This is done by injection of an AC current into the rotor coils. The control system that acheives this may also be able to alter pitch angle of the turbine as another means of increasing or decreasing mechanical rotation speed.
For more information please read this EE answer.
But when I am rotating it with steam or water how do I control this
speed?
There can be situations when there is too much rotational speed and although the DFIG can deal with this it is best to have a combined approach such as the pitch angle control shown in the above picture.
However, the inevitable bottom line is that if you have a plentiful source of mechanical energy and very little load demand at that moment, then you have to un-hook the generator from the grid. If you don't "have" a grid, then you have to have a back-up supply that can supply the low power demand and this usually means a diesel generator or solar power via an inverter.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
If I need to generate power at a specified frequency, then I need to
make sure that the rotor of the generator rotates at a specified speed
(rpm).
No, that is not necessarily true. A lot of wind generators use a doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) and that can regulate frequency by controlling the rotor winding: -
They can convert power at one frequency to another frequency i.e. they can produce 50/60 Hz even though the rotor may be running too slowly. This is done by injection of an AC current into the rotor coils. The control system that acheives this may also be able to alter pitch angle of the turbine as another means of increasing or decreasing mechanical rotation speed.
For more information please read this EE answer.
But when I am rotating it with steam or water how do I control this
speed?
There can be situations when there is too much rotational speed and although the DFIG can deal with this it is best to have a combined approach such as the pitch angle control shown in the above picture.
However, the inevitable bottom line is that if you have a plentiful source of mechanical energy and very little load demand at that moment, then you have to un-hook the generator from the grid. If you don't "have" a grid, then you have to have a back-up supply that can supply the low power demand and this usually means a diesel generator or solar power via an inverter.
If I need to generate power at a specified frequency, then I need to
make sure that the rotor of the generator rotates at a specified speed
(rpm).
No, that is not necessarily true. A lot of wind generators use a doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) and that can regulate frequency by controlling the rotor winding: -
They can convert power at one frequency to another frequency i.e. they can produce 50/60 Hz even though the rotor may be running too slowly. This is done by injection of an AC current into the rotor coils. The control system that acheives this may also be able to alter pitch angle of the turbine as another means of increasing or decreasing mechanical rotation speed.
For more information please read this EE answer.
But when I am rotating it with steam or water how do I control this
speed?
There can be situations when there is too much rotational speed and although the DFIG can deal with this it is best to have a combined approach such as the pitch angle control shown in the above picture.
However, the inevitable bottom line is that if you have a plentiful source of mechanical energy and very little load demand at that moment, then you have to un-hook the generator from the grid. If you don't "have" a grid, then you have to have a back-up supply that can supply the low power demand and this usually means a diesel generator or solar power via an inverter.
edited Nov 8 at 18:35
answered Nov 8 at 13:48
Andy aka
234k10173399
234k10173399
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
That is what a governor is for.
The mechanical version is a device that will use centrifugal force or a blower to actuate the throttle/intake to slow down the engine when the speed climbs too much.
You can make it electronic with an RPM sensor and a electronically controlled throttle/intake.
1
Mechanically throttling the input with a brake generates heat and wastes input power....
– rackandboneman
Nov 8 at 20:12
2
@rackandboneman he isn't talking about that, and that's not how governors work.
– Harper
Nov 8 at 21:23
1
@Harper to be fair some governors do work by using braking however for generators you would be adjusting the mechanical energy generated instead of wasting it.
– ratchet freak
Nov 9 at 1:27
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
That is what a governor is for.
The mechanical version is a device that will use centrifugal force or a blower to actuate the throttle/intake to slow down the engine when the speed climbs too much.
You can make it electronic with an RPM sensor and a electronically controlled throttle/intake.
1
Mechanically throttling the input with a brake generates heat and wastes input power....
– rackandboneman
Nov 8 at 20:12
2
@rackandboneman he isn't talking about that, and that's not how governors work.
– Harper
Nov 8 at 21:23
1
@Harper to be fair some governors do work by using braking however for generators you would be adjusting the mechanical energy generated instead of wasting it.
– ratchet freak
Nov 9 at 1:27
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
That is what a governor is for.
The mechanical version is a device that will use centrifugal force or a blower to actuate the throttle/intake to slow down the engine when the speed climbs too much.
You can make it electronic with an RPM sensor and a electronically controlled throttle/intake.
That is what a governor is for.
The mechanical version is a device that will use centrifugal force or a blower to actuate the throttle/intake to slow down the engine when the speed climbs too much.
You can make it electronic with an RPM sensor and a electronically controlled throttle/intake.
answered Nov 8 at 13:34
ratchet freak
2,5301011
2,5301011
1
Mechanically throttling the input with a brake generates heat and wastes input power....
– rackandboneman
Nov 8 at 20:12
2
@rackandboneman he isn't talking about that, and that's not how governors work.
– Harper
Nov 8 at 21:23
1
@Harper to be fair some governors do work by using braking however for generators you would be adjusting the mechanical energy generated instead of wasting it.
– ratchet freak
Nov 9 at 1:27
add a comment |
1
Mechanically throttling the input with a brake generates heat and wastes input power....
– rackandboneman
Nov 8 at 20:12
2
@rackandboneman he isn't talking about that, and that's not how governors work.
– Harper
Nov 8 at 21:23
1
@Harper to be fair some governors do work by using braking however for generators you would be adjusting the mechanical energy generated instead of wasting it.
– ratchet freak
Nov 9 at 1:27
1
1
Mechanically throttling the input with a brake generates heat and wastes input power....
– rackandboneman
Nov 8 at 20:12
Mechanically throttling the input with a brake generates heat and wastes input power....
– rackandboneman
Nov 8 at 20:12
2
2
@rackandboneman he isn't talking about that, and that's not how governors work.
– Harper
Nov 8 at 21:23
@rackandboneman he isn't talking about that, and that's not how governors work.
– Harper
Nov 8 at 21:23
1
1
@Harper to be fair some governors do work by using braking however for generators you would be adjusting the mechanical energy generated instead of wasting it.
– ratchet freak
Nov 9 at 1:27
@Harper to be fair some governors do work by using braking however for generators you would be adjusting the mechanical energy generated instead of wasting it.
– ratchet freak
Nov 9 at 1:27
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
In my (limited) experience of generator design, you have to look at multiple factors:
Speed of mechanical input (turbine, wheel etc)
Power of mechanical input
Output voltage
Output current
Output power (which depends on voltage and current, but you usually want to maximise this, at a peak power point)
In many cases what you want to maintain is a constant voltage output, which will vary with the electrical load; higher current would make the output drop.
In your set up, you only care about the speed of the shaft (for whatever reason that is). There are two ways to do this: control input power or control output power.
If you know that your mechanical power will always be more than the output power, you could use a governor or similar, which will limit the shaft power to keep the speed constant. This will control the input power in a simple manner.
If you can't guarantee that your mechanical input is higher, you'll need to limit your output power in some way. I have done it where we controlled the output current via a PID feedback controller to keep the shaft speed at fixed values. But that was in a DC system, where we had a large battery to push the current into during high supply times, and draw from during lower supply times.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
In my (limited) experience of generator design, you have to look at multiple factors:
Speed of mechanical input (turbine, wheel etc)
Power of mechanical input
Output voltage
Output current
Output power (which depends on voltage and current, but you usually want to maximise this, at a peak power point)
In many cases what you want to maintain is a constant voltage output, which will vary with the electrical load; higher current would make the output drop.
In your set up, you only care about the speed of the shaft (for whatever reason that is). There are two ways to do this: control input power or control output power.
If you know that your mechanical power will always be more than the output power, you could use a governor or similar, which will limit the shaft power to keep the speed constant. This will control the input power in a simple manner.
If you can't guarantee that your mechanical input is higher, you'll need to limit your output power in some way. I have done it where we controlled the output current via a PID feedback controller to keep the shaft speed at fixed values. But that was in a DC system, where we had a large battery to push the current into during high supply times, and draw from during lower supply times.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
In my (limited) experience of generator design, you have to look at multiple factors:
Speed of mechanical input (turbine, wheel etc)
Power of mechanical input
Output voltage
Output current
Output power (which depends on voltage and current, but you usually want to maximise this, at a peak power point)
In many cases what you want to maintain is a constant voltage output, which will vary with the electrical load; higher current would make the output drop.
In your set up, you only care about the speed of the shaft (for whatever reason that is). There are two ways to do this: control input power or control output power.
If you know that your mechanical power will always be more than the output power, you could use a governor or similar, which will limit the shaft power to keep the speed constant. This will control the input power in a simple manner.
If you can't guarantee that your mechanical input is higher, you'll need to limit your output power in some way. I have done it where we controlled the output current via a PID feedback controller to keep the shaft speed at fixed values. But that was in a DC system, where we had a large battery to push the current into during high supply times, and draw from during lower supply times.
In my (limited) experience of generator design, you have to look at multiple factors:
Speed of mechanical input (turbine, wheel etc)
Power of mechanical input
Output voltage
Output current
Output power (which depends on voltage and current, but you usually want to maximise this, at a peak power point)
In many cases what you want to maintain is a constant voltage output, which will vary with the electrical load; higher current would make the output drop.
In your set up, you only care about the speed of the shaft (for whatever reason that is). There are two ways to do this: control input power or control output power.
If you know that your mechanical power will always be more than the output power, you could use a governor or similar, which will limit the shaft power to keep the speed constant. This will control the input power in a simple manner.
If you can't guarantee that your mechanical input is higher, you'll need to limit your output power in some way. I have done it where we controlled the output current via a PID feedback controller to keep the shaft speed at fixed values. But that was in a DC system, where we had a large battery to push the current into during high supply times, and draw from during lower supply times.
answered Nov 8 at 13:47
Puffafish
855111
855111
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This isn't the way it is done, but it's a way it could be done: vary the load in order to modulate the speed.
You can imagine a (potentially very large) auxiliary load bank in addition to the normal load, with the input power source sized so that it will provide at least enough power for the normal load under all conditions. This isn't completely unthinkable for hydro setups, since the head is the usual determinant. Then, as the load and the input vary, the auxilliary bank is controlled so that the total demand on the generator produces mechanical loading on the input which maintains the output frequency at the desired point.
And no, this isn't a serious suggestion, but it could be done.
So the auxiliary bank could be used to pump some water back uphill? Sounds stupid, but isn't that the same as charging a battery?
– amI
Nov 8 at 19:01
@amI: It's similar, but pumped-storage hydroelectricity is a smart choice because it costs far less than the batteries that would be required to store the same amount of energy.
– davidcary
Nov 8 at 23:56
Storage is good, but you would never power a battery charger off the battery itself (pump hydro using hydro power). I guess the aux load would need to be a 'controlled' customer (that is willing to accept <100% duty).
– amI
Nov 9 at 6:13
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This isn't the way it is done, but it's a way it could be done: vary the load in order to modulate the speed.
You can imagine a (potentially very large) auxiliary load bank in addition to the normal load, with the input power source sized so that it will provide at least enough power for the normal load under all conditions. This isn't completely unthinkable for hydro setups, since the head is the usual determinant. Then, as the load and the input vary, the auxilliary bank is controlled so that the total demand on the generator produces mechanical loading on the input which maintains the output frequency at the desired point.
And no, this isn't a serious suggestion, but it could be done.
So the auxiliary bank could be used to pump some water back uphill? Sounds stupid, but isn't that the same as charging a battery?
– amI
Nov 8 at 19:01
@amI: It's similar, but pumped-storage hydroelectricity is a smart choice because it costs far less than the batteries that would be required to store the same amount of energy.
– davidcary
Nov 8 at 23:56
Storage is good, but you would never power a battery charger off the battery itself (pump hydro using hydro power). I guess the aux load would need to be a 'controlled' customer (that is willing to accept <100% duty).
– amI
Nov 9 at 6:13
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
This isn't the way it is done, but it's a way it could be done: vary the load in order to modulate the speed.
You can imagine a (potentially very large) auxiliary load bank in addition to the normal load, with the input power source sized so that it will provide at least enough power for the normal load under all conditions. This isn't completely unthinkable for hydro setups, since the head is the usual determinant. Then, as the load and the input vary, the auxilliary bank is controlled so that the total demand on the generator produces mechanical loading on the input which maintains the output frequency at the desired point.
And no, this isn't a serious suggestion, but it could be done.
This isn't the way it is done, but it's a way it could be done: vary the load in order to modulate the speed.
You can imagine a (potentially very large) auxiliary load bank in addition to the normal load, with the input power source sized so that it will provide at least enough power for the normal load under all conditions. This isn't completely unthinkable for hydro setups, since the head is the usual determinant. Then, as the load and the input vary, the auxilliary bank is controlled so that the total demand on the generator produces mechanical loading on the input which maintains the output frequency at the desired point.
And no, this isn't a serious suggestion, but it could be done.
answered Nov 8 at 14:46
WhatRoughBeast
48.3k22873
48.3k22873
So the auxiliary bank could be used to pump some water back uphill? Sounds stupid, but isn't that the same as charging a battery?
– amI
Nov 8 at 19:01
@amI: It's similar, but pumped-storage hydroelectricity is a smart choice because it costs far less than the batteries that would be required to store the same amount of energy.
– davidcary
Nov 8 at 23:56
Storage is good, but you would never power a battery charger off the battery itself (pump hydro using hydro power). I guess the aux load would need to be a 'controlled' customer (that is willing to accept <100% duty).
– amI
Nov 9 at 6:13
add a comment |
So the auxiliary bank could be used to pump some water back uphill? Sounds stupid, but isn't that the same as charging a battery?
– amI
Nov 8 at 19:01
@amI: It's similar, but pumped-storage hydroelectricity is a smart choice because it costs far less than the batteries that would be required to store the same amount of energy.
– davidcary
Nov 8 at 23:56
Storage is good, but you would never power a battery charger off the battery itself (pump hydro using hydro power). I guess the aux load would need to be a 'controlled' customer (that is willing to accept <100% duty).
– amI
Nov 9 at 6:13
So the auxiliary bank could be used to pump some water back uphill? Sounds stupid, but isn't that the same as charging a battery?
– amI
Nov 8 at 19:01
So the auxiliary bank could be used to pump some water back uphill? Sounds stupid, but isn't that the same as charging a battery?
– amI
Nov 8 at 19:01
@amI: It's similar, but pumped-storage hydroelectricity is a smart choice because it costs far less than the batteries that would be required to store the same amount of energy.
– davidcary
Nov 8 at 23:56
@amI: It's similar, but pumped-storage hydroelectricity is a smart choice because it costs far less than the batteries that would be required to store the same amount of energy.
– davidcary
Nov 8 at 23:56
Storage is good, but you would never power a battery charger off the battery itself (pump hydro using hydro power). I guess the aux load would need to be a 'controlled' customer (that is willing to accept <100% duty).
– amI
Nov 9 at 6:13
Storage is good, but you would never power a battery charger off the battery itself (pump hydro using hydro power). I guess the aux load would need to be a 'controlled' customer (that is willing to accept <100% duty).
– amI
Nov 9 at 6:13
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f405687%2fhow-do-i-fix-the-speed-of-a-generator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
With some sort of throttle on the prime mover, adjusted so that power in equals power out (plus internal losses).
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 8 at 13:35
7
I'm pretty sure that large generators attached to mains are forced into synchronicity by the influence of all the other things attached to mains; if the generator slows down any, there would be a motor torque applied by the mains power pulling it back towards synchronous speed, and likewise if it speeds up. This is a problem in itself rather than a solution, though, because if your generator starts running as a motor it's likely to tear itself or things attached to its shaft apart; it's not made to operate like that.
– Felthry
Nov 8 at 13:41
2
Wasn't the flyball governor on Watt's steam engine essentially doing this through mechanical feedback?
– DaveInCaz
Nov 8 at 17:58
The faster the generator tries to spin, the more current you could draw from it to make it slow back down. That requires a variable load of course.
– immibis
Nov 9 at 0:58
1
This is awfully broad for a question. In sum, your options are to either vary the incoming power, vary the load, or forget about frequency regulation altogether and do something else (use a DC load, a load which doesn't care about frequency, or use a frequency transformer). I don't think it's possible to reasonably pick an option given that you disclosed zero information about your system.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
Nov 9 at 8:25