Visa waiver denied at airport [closed]



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I was traveling from Europe to LAX and my ESTA was denied. I was sent back home. I was going only for a 12-days holiday. The problem for them was that:



  1. Somebody bought the ticket for me. Not a family member, but a friend, whom I was about to meet at the airport. We met on social media, and he invited me for holidays.


  2. I was staying not at a hotel but at my friend's house, and he doesn't know much about airport immigration, so I sent him a text before the trip that was possible that they would call him, not to worry, etc. And they didn't like that.


  3. They saw my on my Instagram profile that I was on the picture on a club event. (They thought maybe I was paid for that) and maybe I would this time. But I'm not. I said they could call the club and ask, but they didn't. It's just a free party and free tables for people. But it's hard to explain it to them. And of course I was refused to ented the US with on a visa waiver.


So that's my case.



They said to me I could go home and apply for a visitor's visa and that it's pretty easy when you have a job and strong ties in Europe or your home country.



So I will start a job in London, in May 2018. I want to try to apply for a visitor's visa form in September and go to the embassy. Do you think I will have problems? And can I get a visa if I have a job, my own money, my own tickets, my own hotel reservation, etc? Just because once I was refused to enter country under visa waiver?



And if I get a visitor's visa, hat can happen again at the airport with imigration officers? Even though I have all what is asked, can they still deny me just because of a previous experience? Can you give me some advice? Thank you very much.







share|improve this question














closed as unclear what you're asking by Robert Columbia, Giorgio, Newton, Mark Mayo♦ Mar 31 at 23:19


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 4




    What is your citizenship ?
    – DumbCoder
    Mar 27 at 8:33






  • 3




    While it often goes quicker, the official recommendation is to apply for the ESTA 72 hours before traveling such that you have time to verify whether it was denied before leaving home. Finding out only on arrival that it didn't actually go through is, as you've found out, not an optimal experience, since you will then in principle be arriving illegally.
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 27 at 10:01







  • 9




    @HenningMakholm I think the OP meant that he/she was denied entry under the Visa Waiver Program. The first sentence states that the ESTA was denied, but later in the post, a denial of entry to the US is mentioned. Surely at the airport before departure, nobody will look at an instagram profile.
    – DCTLib
    Mar 27 at 11:11











  • @HenningMakholm The asker wouldn't have been allowed onto the plane if they didn't have an ESTA. They were denied entry to the US under the Visa Waiver Program.
    – David Richerby
    Mar 31 at 17:24











  • @DavidRicherby: I'm almost sure that at least some of the recent times I've traveled to the US, I've been asked by the check-in agent whether I had an ESTA, and they've been happy with my uncorroborated claim of "yes". I don't think that would have happened if airlines have a reliable way of determining passengers' ESTA status independently.
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 31 at 17:31

















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I was traveling from Europe to LAX and my ESTA was denied. I was sent back home. I was going only for a 12-days holiday. The problem for them was that:



  1. Somebody bought the ticket for me. Not a family member, but a friend, whom I was about to meet at the airport. We met on social media, and he invited me for holidays.


  2. I was staying not at a hotel but at my friend's house, and he doesn't know much about airport immigration, so I sent him a text before the trip that was possible that they would call him, not to worry, etc. And they didn't like that.


  3. They saw my on my Instagram profile that I was on the picture on a club event. (They thought maybe I was paid for that) and maybe I would this time. But I'm not. I said they could call the club and ask, but they didn't. It's just a free party and free tables for people. But it's hard to explain it to them. And of course I was refused to ented the US with on a visa waiver.


So that's my case.



They said to me I could go home and apply for a visitor's visa and that it's pretty easy when you have a job and strong ties in Europe or your home country.



So I will start a job in London, in May 2018. I want to try to apply for a visitor's visa form in September and go to the embassy. Do you think I will have problems? And can I get a visa if I have a job, my own money, my own tickets, my own hotel reservation, etc? Just because once I was refused to enter country under visa waiver?



And if I get a visitor's visa, hat can happen again at the airport with imigration officers? Even though I have all what is asked, can they still deny me just because of a previous experience? Can you give me some advice? Thank you very much.







share|improve this question














closed as unclear what you're asking by Robert Columbia, Giorgio, Newton, Mark Mayo♦ Mar 31 at 23:19


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 4




    What is your citizenship ?
    – DumbCoder
    Mar 27 at 8:33






  • 3




    While it often goes quicker, the official recommendation is to apply for the ESTA 72 hours before traveling such that you have time to verify whether it was denied before leaving home. Finding out only on arrival that it didn't actually go through is, as you've found out, not an optimal experience, since you will then in principle be arriving illegally.
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 27 at 10:01







  • 9




    @HenningMakholm I think the OP meant that he/she was denied entry under the Visa Waiver Program. The first sentence states that the ESTA was denied, but later in the post, a denial of entry to the US is mentioned. Surely at the airport before departure, nobody will look at an instagram profile.
    – DCTLib
    Mar 27 at 11:11











  • @HenningMakholm The asker wouldn't have been allowed onto the plane if they didn't have an ESTA. They were denied entry to the US under the Visa Waiver Program.
    – David Richerby
    Mar 31 at 17:24











  • @DavidRicherby: I'm almost sure that at least some of the recent times I've traveled to the US, I've been asked by the check-in agent whether I had an ESTA, and they've been happy with my uncorroborated claim of "yes". I don't think that would have happened if airlines have a reliable way of determining passengers' ESTA status independently.
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 31 at 17:31













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











I was traveling from Europe to LAX and my ESTA was denied. I was sent back home. I was going only for a 12-days holiday. The problem for them was that:



  1. Somebody bought the ticket for me. Not a family member, but a friend, whom I was about to meet at the airport. We met on social media, and he invited me for holidays.


  2. I was staying not at a hotel but at my friend's house, and he doesn't know much about airport immigration, so I sent him a text before the trip that was possible that they would call him, not to worry, etc. And they didn't like that.


  3. They saw my on my Instagram profile that I was on the picture on a club event. (They thought maybe I was paid for that) and maybe I would this time. But I'm not. I said they could call the club and ask, but they didn't. It's just a free party and free tables for people. But it's hard to explain it to them. And of course I was refused to ented the US with on a visa waiver.


So that's my case.



They said to me I could go home and apply for a visitor's visa and that it's pretty easy when you have a job and strong ties in Europe or your home country.



So I will start a job in London, in May 2018. I want to try to apply for a visitor's visa form in September and go to the embassy. Do you think I will have problems? And can I get a visa if I have a job, my own money, my own tickets, my own hotel reservation, etc? Just because once I was refused to enter country under visa waiver?



And if I get a visitor's visa, hat can happen again at the airport with imigration officers? Even though I have all what is asked, can they still deny me just because of a previous experience? Can you give me some advice? Thank you very much.







share|improve this question














I was traveling from Europe to LAX and my ESTA was denied. I was sent back home. I was going only for a 12-days holiday. The problem for them was that:



  1. Somebody bought the ticket for me. Not a family member, but a friend, whom I was about to meet at the airport. We met on social media, and he invited me for holidays.


  2. I was staying not at a hotel but at my friend's house, and he doesn't know much about airport immigration, so I sent him a text before the trip that was possible that they would call him, not to worry, etc. And they didn't like that.


  3. They saw my on my Instagram profile that I was on the picture on a club event. (They thought maybe I was paid for that) and maybe I would this time. But I'm not. I said they could call the club and ask, but they didn't. It's just a free party and free tables for people. But it's hard to explain it to them. And of course I was refused to ented the US with on a visa waiver.


So that's my case.



They said to me I could go home and apply for a visitor's visa and that it's pretty easy when you have a job and strong ties in Europe or your home country.



So I will start a job in London, in May 2018. I want to try to apply for a visitor's visa form in September and go to the embassy. Do you think I will have problems? And can I get a visa if I have a job, my own money, my own tickets, my own hotel reservation, etc? Just because once I was refused to enter country under visa waiver?



And if I get a visitor's visa, hat can happen again at the airport with imigration officers? Even though I have all what is asked, can they still deny me just because of a previous experience? Can you give me some advice? Thank you very much.









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 27 at 15:24









jpatokal

109k17326481




109k17326481










asked Mar 27 at 8:27









Kaekae2018

241




241




closed as unclear what you're asking by Robert Columbia, Giorgio, Newton, Mark Mayo♦ Mar 31 at 23:19


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






closed as unclear what you're asking by Robert Columbia, Giorgio, Newton, Mark Mayo♦ Mar 31 at 23:19


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 4




    What is your citizenship ?
    – DumbCoder
    Mar 27 at 8:33






  • 3




    While it often goes quicker, the official recommendation is to apply for the ESTA 72 hours before traveling such that you have time to verify whether it was denied before leaving home. Finding out only on arrival that it didn't actually go through is, as you've found out, not an optimal experience, since you will then in principle be arriving illegally.
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 27 at 10:01







  • 9




    @HenningMakholm I think the OP meant that he/she was denied entry under the Visa Waiver Program. The first sentence states that the ESTA was denied, but later in the post, a denial of entry to the US is mentioned. Surely at the airport before departure, nobody will look at an instagram profile.
    – DCTLib
    Mar 27 at 11:11











  • @HenningMakholm The asker wouldn't have been allowed onto the plane if they didn't have an ESTA. They were denied entry to the US under the Visa Waiver Program.
    – David Richerby
    Mar 31 at 17:24











  • @DavidRicherby: I'm almost sure that at least some of the recent times I've traveled to the US, I've been asked by the check-in agent whether I had an ESTA, and they've been happy with my uncorroborated claim of "yes". I don't think that would have happened if airlines have a reliable way of determining passengers' ESTA status independently.
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 31 at 17:31













  • 4




    What is your citizenship ?
    – DumbCoder
    Mar 27 at 8:33






  • 3




    While it often goes quicker, the official recommendation is to apply for the ESTA 72 hours before traveling such that you have time to verify whether it was denied before leaving home. Finding out only on arrival that it didn't actually go through is, as you've found out, not an optimal experience, since you will then in principle be arriving illegally.
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 27 at 10:01







  • 9




    @HenningMakholm I think the OP meant that he/she was denied entry under the Visa Waiver Program. The first sentence states that the ESTA was denied, but later in the post, a denial of entry to the US is mentioned. Surely at the airport before departure, nobody will look at an instagram profile.
    – DCTLib
    Mar 27 at 11:11











  • @HenningMakholm The asker wouldn't have been allowed onto the plane if they didn't have an ESTA. They were denied entry to the US under the Visa Waiver Program.
    – David Richerby
    Mar 31 at 17:24











  • @DavidRicherby: I'm almost sure that at least some of the recent times I've traveled to the US, I've been asked by the check-in agent whether I had an ESTA, and they've been happy with my uncorroborated claim of "yes". I don't think that would have happened if airlines have a reliable way of determining passengers' ESTA status independently.
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 31 at 17:31








4




4




What is your citizenship ?
– DumbCoder
Mar 27 at 8:33




What is your citizenship ?
– DumbCoder
Mar 27 at 8:33




3




3




While it often goes quicker, the official recommendation is to apply for the ESTA 72 hours before traveling such that you have time to verify whether it was denied before leaving home. Finding out only on arrival that it didn't actually go through is, as you've found out, not an optimal experience, since you will then in principle be arriving illegally.
– Henning Makholm
Mar 27 at 10:01





While it often goes quicker, the official recommendation is to apply for the ESTA 72 hours before traveling such that you have time to verify whether it was denied before leaving home. Finding out only on arrival that it didn't actually go through is, as you've found out, not an optimal experience, since you will then in principle be arriving illegally.
– Henning Makholm
Mar 27 at 10:01





9




9




@HenningMakholm I think the OP meant that he/she was denied entry under the Visa Waiver Program. The first sentence states that the ESTA was denied, but later in the post, a denial of entry to the US is mentioned. Surely at the airport before departure, nobody will look at an instagram profile.
– DCTLib
Mar 27 at 11:11





@HenningMakholm I think the OP meant that he/she was denied entry under the Visa Waiver Program. The first sentence states that the ESTA was denied, but later in the post, a denial of entry to the US is mentioned. Surely at the airport before departure, nobody will look at an instagram profile.
– DCTLib
Mar 27 at 11:11













@HenningMakholm The asker wouldn't have been allowed onto the plane if they didn't have an ESTA. They were denied entry to the US under the Visa Waiver Program.
– David Richerby
Mar 31 at 17:24





@HenningMakholm The asker wouldn't have been allowed onto the plane if they didn't have an ESTA. They were denied entry to the US under the Visa Waiver Program.
– David Richerby
Mar 31 at 17:24













@DavidRicherby: I'm almost sure that at least some of the recent times I've traveled to the US, I've been asked by the check-in agent whether I had an ESTA, and they've been happy with my uncorroborated claim of "yes". I don't think that would have happened if airlines have a reliable way of determining passengers' ESTA status independently.
– Henning Makholm
Mar 31 at 17:31





@DavidRicherby: I'm almost sure that at least some of the recent times I've traveled to the US, I've been asked by the check-in agent whether I had an ESTA, and they've been happy with my uncorroborated claim of "yes". I don't think that would have happened if airlines have a reliable way of determining passengers' ESTA status independently.
– Henning Makholm
Mar 31 at 17:31











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote














Do you think I will have problems?




We can't predict the immigration officers actions. Opinions here are likely to vary. Certainly your previous history will affect future applications. At a minimum I would expect more time to be spent scrutinising your application.




can I get a visa if I have a job, my own money, my own tickets, my own hotel reservation, etc?




None of those should prevent you from obtaining a visa.



Neither are they a cast-iron guarantee that you will obtain a visa.



They are factors in your favour.




Just because once I was refused to enter country under visa waiver?




One refusal does not constitute a lifetime ban. Particularly as they suggested you apply for a visa.




What can happen again at the airport with imigration officers?




You can't rule out anything. You just have to do your best to provide accurate, truthful, complete information.




can they still deny me just because of a previous experience?




They can deny anyone entry. But not solely because you were denied entry before, that would be an insufficient reason by itself. From what you wrote in your question, your circumstances will have changed.




In short, I suggest you stop worrying, accept the possibility of denial, plan for both outcomes, but do your best to make your application as completely accurate and honest as possible. You seem to be on the right track in addressing those aspects that you believe contributed to the previous refusal.






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    You were previously eligible for the visa waiver program. However, some aspects of your previous plans caused them to deny entry.



    Unfortunately, you are now almost certainly ineligible for the visa waiver program per: https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/non-immigrant-visa-waiver-program-vwp/




    Who is eligible



    Citizens of ...



    holding valid, full validity e-passports with an electronic chip who are traveling



    • for business, pleasure or transit for less than 90 days. Visa-free travel does not include those who plan to study, work or remain in the United States for more than 90 days;

    • are not ineligible to receive a visa under U.S. visa law. Travelers who have been arrested, even if the arrest did not result in a criminal conviction, those with criminal records, (the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act does not apply to U.S. visa law), certain serious communicable illnesses, those who have been refused admission into, or have been deported from, the United States, or have previously overstayed on the VWP are not eligible to travel visa free under the Visa Waiver Program;






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      There's no indication that Kaekae2018 is a British citizen, but the same is true for anyone whose nationality is eligible for the VWP.
      – phoog
      Mar 27 at 17:59






    • 1




      I think that embassy page is inaccurate or out of date. (Being government work doesn't ensure accuracy, and the embassy belongs to a different branch of the US administration than the one that oversees immigration regulations). I'm almost sure such a requirement did in fact use to be a part of the conditions of the VWP, but it does not appear to be present in the current statute or regulations.
      – Henning Makholm
      Mar 27 at 18:40







    • 1




      What is true is that travelers who "have previously overstayed on the VWP" are not eligible. Neither are travelers who are categorically ineligible to receive a visa, or who are "inadmissible" to the US. But the other conditions of that bullet item do not seem to have any basis in the current rules. (In particular they do not in themselves make someone inadmissible or ineligible for a visa).
      – Henning Makholm
      Mar 27 at 18:42







    • 1




      Edited, to remove explicit mention of UK citizenship. As phoog points out, the OP doesn't say they are british.
      – Nick
      Mar 28 at 17:16

















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote














    Do you think I will have problems?




    We can't predict the immigration officers actions. Opinions here are likely to vary. Certainly your previous history will affect future applications. At a minimum I would expect more time to be spent scrutinising your application.




    can I get a visa if I have a job, my own money, my own tickets, my own hotel reservation, etc?




    None of those should prevent you from obtaining a visa.



    Neither are they a cast-iron guarantee that you will obtain a visa.



    They are factors in your favour.




    Just because once I was refused to enter country under visa waiver?




    One refusal does not constitute a lifetime ban. Particularly as they suggested you apply for a visa.




    What can happen again at the airport with imigration officers?




    You can't rule out anything. You just have to do your best to provide accurate, truthful, complete information.




    can they still deny me just because of a previous experience?




    They can deny anyone entry. But not solely because you were denied entry before, that would be an insufficient reason by itself. From what you wrote in your question, your circumstances will have changed.




    In short, I suggest you stop worrying, accept the possibility of denial, plan for both outcomes, but do your best to make your application as completely accurate and honest as possible. You seem to be on the right track in addressing those aspects that you believe contributed to the previous refusal.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      5
      down vote














      Do you think I will have problems?




      We can't predict the immigration officers actions. Opinions here are likely to vary. Certainly your previous history will affect future applications. At a minimum I would expect more time to be spent scrutinising your application.




      can I get a visa if I have a job, my own money, my own tickets, my own hotel reservation, etc?




      None of those should prevent you from obtaining a visa.



      Neither are they a cast-iron guarantee that you will obtain a visa.



      They are factors in your favour.




      Just because once I was refused to enter country under visa waiver?




      One refusal does not constitute a lifetime ban. Particularly as they suggested you apply for a visa.




      What can happen again at the airport with imigration officers?




      You can't rule out anything. You just have to do your best to provide accurate, truthful, complete information.




      can they still deny me just because of a previous experience?




      They can deny anyone entry. But not solely because you were denied entry before, that would be an insufficient reason by itself. From what you wrote in your question, your circumstances will have changed.




      In short, I suggest you stop worrying, accept the possibility of denial, plan for both outcomes, but do your best to make your application as completely accurate and honest as possible. You seem to be on the right track in addressing those aspects that you believe contributed to the previous refusal.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        5
        down vote










        up vote
        5
        down vote










        Do you think I will have problems?




        We can't predict the immigration officers actions. Opinions here are likely to vary. Certainly your previous history will affect future applications. At a minimum I would expect more time to be spent scrutinising your application.




        can I get a visa if I have a job, my own money, my own tickets, my own hotel reservation, etc?




        None of those should prevent you from obtaining a visa.



        Neither are they a cast-iron guarantee that you will obtain a visa.



        They are factors in your favour.




        Just because once I was refused to enter country under visa waiver?




        One refusal does not constitute a lifetime ban. Particularly as they suggested you apply for a visa.




        What can happen again at the airport with imigration officers?




        You can't rule out anything. You just have to do your best to provide accurate, truthful, complete information.




        can they still deny me just because of a previous experience?




        They can deny anyone entry. But not solely because you were denied entry before, that would be an insufficient reason by itself. From what you wrote in your question, your circumstances will have changed.




        In short, I suggest you stop worrying, accept the possibility of denial, plan for both outcomes, but do your best to make your application as completely accurate and honest as possible. You seem to be on the right track in addressing those aspects that you believe contributed to the previous refusal.






        share|improve this answer















        Do you think I will have problems?




        We can't predict the immigration officers actions. Opinions here are likely to vary. Certainly your previous history will affect future applications. At a minimum I would expect more time to be spent scrutinising your application.




        can I get a visa if I have a job, my own money, my own tickets, my own hotel reservation, etc?




        None of those should prevent you from obtaining a visa.



        Neither are they a cast-iron guarantee that you will obtain a visa.



        They are factors in your favour.




        Just because once I was refused to enter country under visa waiver?




        One refusal does not constitute a lifetime ban. Particularly as they suggested you apply for a visa.




        What can happen again at the airport with imigration officers?




        You can't rule out anything. You just have to do your best to provide accurate, truthful, complete information.




        can they still deny me just because of a previous experience?




        They can deny anyone entry. But not solely because you were denied entry before, that would be an insufficient reason by itself. From what you wrote in your question, your circumstances will have changed.




        In short, I suggest you stop worrying, accept the possibility of denial, plan for both outcomes, but do your best to make your application as completely accurate and honest as possible. You seem to be on the right track in addressing those aspects that you believe contributed to the previous refusal.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 27 at 15:06

























        answered Mar 27 at 15:00









        RedGrittyBrick

        4,11811233




        4,11811233






















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            You were previously eligible for the visa waiver program. However, some aspects of your previous plans caused them to deny entry.



            Unfortunately, you are now almost certainly ineligible for the visa waiver program per: https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/non-immigrant-visa-waiver-program-vwp/




            Who is eligible



            Citizens of ...



            holding valid, full validity e-passports with an electronic chip who are traveling



            • for business, pleasure or transit for less than 90 days. Visa-free travel does not include those who plan to study, work or remain in the United States for more than 90 days;

            • are not ineligible to receive a visa under U.S. visa law. Travelers who have been arrested, even if the arrest did not result in a criminal conviction, those with criminal records, (the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act does not apply to U.S. visa law), certain serious communicable illnesses, those who have been refused admission into, or have been deported from, the United States, or have previously overstayed on the VWP are not eligible to travel visa free under the Visa Waiver Program;






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1




              There's no indication that Kaekae2018 is a British citizen, but the same is true for anyone whose nationality is eligible for the VWP.
              – phoog
              Mar 27 at 17:59






            • 1




              I think that embassy page is inaccurate or out of date. (Being government work doesn't ensure accuracy, and the embassy belongs to a different branch of the US administration than the one that oversees immigration regulations). I'm almost sure such a requirement did in fact use to be a part of the conditions of the VWP, but it does not appear to be present in the current statute or regulations.
              – Henning Makholm
              Mar 27 at 18:40







            • 1




              What is true is that travelers who "have previously overstayed on the VWP" are not eligible. Neither are travelers who are categorically ineligible to receive a visa, or who are "inadmissible" to the US. But the other conditions of that bullet item do not seem to have any basis in the current rules. (In particular they do not in themselves make someone inadmissible or ineligible for a visa).
              – Henning Makholm
              Mar 27 at 18:42







            • 1




              Edited, to remove explicit mention of UK citizenship. As phoog points out, the OP doesn't say they are british.
              – Nick
              Mar 28 at 17:16














            up vote
            2
            down vote













            You were previously eligible for the visa waiver program. However, some aspects of your previous plans caused them to deny entry.



            Unfortunately, you are now almost certainly ineligible for the visa waiver program per: https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/non-immigrant-visa-waiver-program-vwp/




            Who is eligible



            Citizens of ...



            holding valid, full validity e-passports with an electronic chip who are traveling



            • for business, pleasure or transit for less than 90 days. Visa-free travel does not include those who plan to study, work or remain in the United States for more than 90 days;

            • are not ineligible to receive a visa under U.S. visa law. Travelers who have been arrested, even if the arrest did not result in a criminal conviction, those with criminal records, (the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act does not apply to U.S. visa law), certain serious communicable illnesses, those who have been refused admission into, or have been deported from, the United States, or have previously overstayed on the VWP are not eligible to travel visa free under the Visa Waiver Program;






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1




              There's no indication that Kaekae2018 is a British citizen, but the same is true for anyone whose nationality is eligible for the VWP.
              – phoog
              Mar 27 at 17:59






            • 1




              I think that embassy page is inaccurate or out of date. (Being government work doesn't ensure accuracy, and the embassy belongs to a different branch of the US administration than the one that oversees immigration regulations). I'm almost sure such a requirement did in fact use to be a part of the conditions of the VWP, but it does not appear to be present in the current statute or regulations.
              – Henning Makholm
              Mar 27 at 18:40







            • 1




              What is true is that travelers who "have previously overstayed on the VWP" are not eligible. Neither are travelers who are categorically ineligible to receive a visa, or who are "inadmissible" to the US. But the other conditions of that bullet item do not seem to have any basis in the current rules. (In particular they do not in themselves make someone inadmissible or ineligible for a visa).
              – Henning Makholm
              Mar 27 at 18:42







            • 1




              Edited, to remove explicit mention of UK citizenship. As phoog points out, the OP doesn't say they are british.
              – Nick
              Mar 28 at 17:16












            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            You were previously eligible for the visa waiver program. However, some aspects of your previous plans caused them to deny entry.



            Unfortunately, you are now almost certainly ineligible for the visa waiver program per: https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/non-immigrant-visa-waiver-program-vwp/




            Who is eligible



            Citizens of ...



            holding valid, full validity e-passports with an electronic chip who are traveling



            • for business, pleasure or transit for less than 90 days. Visa-free travel does not include those who plan to study, work or remain in the United States for more than 90 days;

            • are not ineligible to receive a visa under U.S. visa law. Travelers who have been arrested, even if the arrest did not result in a criminal conviction, those with criminal records, (the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act does not apply to U.S. visa law), certain serious communicable illnesses, those who have been refused admission into, or have been deported from, the United States, or have previously overstayed on the VWP are not eligible to travel visa free under the Visa Waiver Program;






            share|improve this answer














            You were previously eligible for the visa waiver program. However, some aspects of your previous plans caused them to deny entry.



            Unfortunately, you are now almost certainly ineligible for the visa waiver program per: https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/non-immigrant-visa-waiver-program-vwp/




            Who is eligible



            Citizens of ...



            holding valid, full validity e-passports with an electronic chip who are traveling



            • for business, pleasure or transit for less than 90 days. Visa-free travel does not include those who plan to study, work or remain in the United States for more than 90 days;

            • are not ineligible to receive a visa under U.S. visa law. Travelers who have been arrested, even if the arrest did not result in a criminal conviction, those with criminal records, (the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act does not apply to U.S. visa law), certain serious communicable illnesses, those who have been refused admission into, or have been deported from, the United States, or have previously overstayed on the VWP are not eligible to travel visa free under the Visa Waiver Program;







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 31 at 15:23









            dda

            14.3k32951




            14.3k32951










            answered Mar 27 at 16:57









            Nick

            77016




            77016







            • 1




              There's no indication that Kaekae2018 is a British citizen, but the same is true for anyone whose nationality is eligible for the VWP.
              – phoog
              Mar 27 at 17:59






            • 1




              I think that embassy page is inaccurate or out of date. (Being government work doesn't ensure accuracy, and the embassy belongs to a different branch of the US administration than the one that oversees immigration regulations). I'm almost sure such a requirement did in fact use to be a part of the conditions of the VWP, but it does not appear to be present in the current statute or regulations.
              – Henning Makholm
              Mar 27 at 18:40







            • 1




              What is true is that travelers who "have previously overstayed on the VWP" are not eligible. Neither are travelers who are categorically ineligible to receive a visa, or who are "inadmissible" to the US. But the other conditions of that bullet item do not seem to have any basis in the current rules. (In particular they do not in themselves make someone inadmissible or ineligible for a visa).
              – Henning Makholm
              Mar 27 at 18:42







            • 1




              Edited, to remove explicit mention of UK citizenship. As phoog points out, the OP doesn't say they are british.
              – Nick
              Mar 28 at 17:16












            • 1




              There's no indication that Kaekae2018 is a British citizen, but the same is true for anyone whose nationality is eligible for the VWP.
              – phoog
              Mar 27 at 17:59






            • 1




              I think that embassy page is inaccurate or out of date. (Being government work doesn't ensure accuracy, and the embassy belongs to a different branch of the US administration than the one that oversees immigration regulations). I'm almost sure such a requirement did in fact use to be a part of the conditions of the VWP, but it does not appear to be present in the current statute or regulations.
              – Henning Makholm
              Mar 27 at 18:40







            • 1




              What is true is that travelers who "have previously overstayed on the VWP" are not eligible. Neither are travelers who are categorically ineligible to receive a visa, or who are "inadmissible" to the US. But the other conditions of that bullet item do not seem to have any basis in the current rules. (In particular they do not in themselves make someone inadmissible or ineligible for a visa).
              – Henning Makholm
              Mar 27 at 18:42







            • 1




              Edited, to remove explicit mention of UK citizenship. As phoog points out, the OP doesn't say they are british.
              – Nick
              Mar 28 at 17:16







            1




            1




            There's no indication that Kaekae2018 is a British citizen, but the same is true for anyone whose nationality is eligible for the VWP.
            – phoog
            Mar 27 at 17:59




            There's no indication that Kaekae2018 is a British citizen, but the same is true for anyone whose nationality is eligible for the VWP.
            – phoog
            Mar 27 at 17:59




            1




            1




            I think that embassy page is inaccurate or out of date. (Being government work doesn't ensure accuracy, and the embassy belongs to a different branch of the US administration than the one that oversees immigration regulations). I'm almost sure such a requirement did in fact use to be a part of the conditions of the VWP, but it does not appear to be present in the current statute or regulations.
            – Henning Makholm
            Mar 27 at 18:40





            I think that embassy page is inaccurate or out of date. (Being government work doesn't ensure accuracy, and the embassy belongs to a different branch of the US administration than the one that oversees immigration regulations). I'm almost sure such a requirement did in fact use to be a part of the conditions of the VWP, but it does not appear to be present in the current statute or regulations.
            – Henning Makholm
            Mar 27 at 18:40





            1




            1




            What is true is that travelers who "have previously overstayed on the VWP" are not eligible. Neither are travelers who are categorically ineligible to receive a visa, or who are "inadmissible" to the US. But the other conditions of that bullet item do not seem to have any basis in the current rules. (In particular they do not in themselves make someone inadmissible or ineligible for a visa).
            – Henning Makholm
            Mar 27 at 18:42





            What is true is that travelers who "have previously overstayed on the VWP" are not eligible. Neither are travelers who are categorically ineligible to receive a visa, or who are "inadmissible" to the US. But the other conditions of that bullet item do not seem to have any basis in the current rules. (In particular they do not in themselves make someone inadmissible or ineligible for a visa).
            – Henning Makholm
            Mar 27 at 18:42





            1




            1




            Edited, to remove explicit mention of UK citizenship. As phoog points out, the OP doesn't say they are british.
            – Nick
            Mar 28 at 17:16




            Edited, to remove explicit mention of UK citizenship. As phoog points out, the OP doesn't say they are british.
            – Nick
            Mar 28 at 17:16



            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            How do I collapse sections of code in Visual Studio Code for Windows?

            ャフサォクコ ケウ,コ,ワ メ,ロスョノ゙,クネ,フムカヤヲニ,エコ゚ツ ウイオン゙ケワサネォキモュキォウイノンコチ゚メヌナイゥフュ,カヒウネェ ネ,ホノケ,ムュキ ッボーミュハ,チ ツス ィ メウイマヤ,゙ウチ ヅ ロ,ォジヌェ ャヌット ェ,マャ,チナエヒネソキツテ トホヲヲミーァ