Is it possible to be denied entry into USA after being granted a tourist visa by my local embassy?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
28
down vote
favorite
I have a trip to the USA planned for 2018. I am a citizen of Montenegro - we are on good standing with the Americans, but we do need to apply for a visa in order to visit.
The possible issue is - I visited Iran earlier this year as a tourist. I am a bit worried I may be declined for this reason, but I will take my chances and schedule the interview at the embassy.
What I am more worried about is the following scenario:
The consul approves my visa request, I am issued a visa
I book my flights and travel to NY
Some TSA/immigration officer decides not to let me into the country after all
I waste a lot of time and money and have to take the first flight back
Is this possible? Can someone at the airport override the embassy's decision and deny me entry?
There is no legal reason for me not to visit, it's only the Iranian visa in my passport that has me concerned I may be turned back for "security reasons".
visas usa denial-of-entry montenegrin-citizens
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
28
down vote
favorite
I have a trip to the USA planned for 2018. I am a citizen of Montenegro - we are on good standing with the Americans, but we do need to apply for a visa in order to visit.
The possible issue is - I visited Iran earlier this year as a tourist. I am a bit worried I may be declined for this reason, but I will take my chances and schedule the interview at the embassy.
What I am more worried about is the following scenario:
The consul approves my visa request, I am issued a visa
I book my flights and travel to NY
Some TSA/immigration officer decides not to let me into the country after all
I waste a lot of time and money and have to take the first flight back
Is this possible? Can someone at the airport override the embassy's decision and deny me entry?
There is no legal reason for me not to visit, it's only the Iranian visa in my passport that has me concerned I may be turned back for "security reasons".
visas usa denial-of-entry montenegrin-citizens
5
Even if you were from, for example EU and not from Montenegro you would have to apply to a US visa after a trip to Iran. That is, they perform extra checks on anyone who has been there.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 18:36
2
How hard/expensive would it be to renew your passport early? That might make the stamp go away...
â Erno de Weerd
Dec 18 '17 at 20:21
Well, not hard or expensive, but very slow. I'd rather not if I don't have to.
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 20:25
5
@ErnodeWeerd: I can only advise the OP against any smart-alec move to try to hide the fact that he has visited Iran.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 23:47
4
@QuoraFeans: Renewing your passport early, applying for a proper visa, and not lying about the Iran visit seems entirely reasonable. It reduces the chance of immigration officials making "mistakes".
â MSalters
Dec 19 '17 at 9:53
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
28
down vote
favorite
up vote
28
down vote
favorite
I have a trip to the USA planned for 2018. I am a citizen of Montenegro - we are on good standing with the Americans, but we do need to apply for a visa in order to visit.
The possible issue is - I visited Iran earlier this year as a tourist. I am a bit worried I may be declined for this reason, but I will take my chances and schedule the interview at the embassy.
What I am more worried about is the following scenario:
The consul approves my visa request, I am issued a visa
I book my flights and travel to NY
Some TSA/immigration officer decides not to let me into the country after all
I waste a lot of time and money and have to take the first flight back
Is this possible? Can someone at the airport override the embassy's decision and deny me entry?
There is no legal reason for me not to visit, it's only the Iranian visa in my passport that has me concerned I may be turned back for "security reasons".
visas usa denial-of-entry montenegrin-citizens
I have a trip to the USA planned for 2018. I am a citizen of Montenegro - we are on good standing with the Americans, but we do need to apply for a visa in order to visit.
The possible issue is - I visited Iran earlier this year as a tourist. I am a bit worried I may be declined for this reason, but I will take my chances and schedule the interview at the embassy.
What I am more worried about is the following scenario:
The consul approves my visa request, I am issued a visa
I book my flights and travel to NY
Some TSA/immigration officer decides not to let me into the country after all
I waste a lot of time and money and have to take the first flight back
Is this possible? Can someone at the airport override the embassy's decision and deny me entry?
There is no legal reason for me not to visit, it's only the Iranian visa in my passport that has me concerned I may be turned back for "security reasons".
visas usa denial-of-entry montenegrin-citizens
visas usa denial-of-entry montenegrin-citizens
edited Dec 22 '17 at 14:06
JonathanReezâ¦
46.6k36214458
46.6k36214458
asked Dec 18 '17 at 13:56
jovan
24626
24626
5
Even if you were from, for example EU and not from Montenegro you would have to apply to a US visa after a trip to Iran. That is, they perform extra checks on anyone who has been there.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 18:36
2
How hard/expensive would it be to renew your passport early? That might make the stamp go away...
â Erno de Weerd
Dec 18 '17 at 20:21
Well, not hard or expensive, but very slow. I'd rather not if I don't have to.
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 20:25
5
@ErnodeWeerd: I can only advise the OP against any smart-alec move to try to hide the fact that he has visited Iran.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 23:47
4
@QuoraFeans: Renewing your passport early, applying for a proper visa, and not lying about the Iran visit seems entirely reasonable. It reduces the chance of immigration officials making "mistakes".
â MSalters
Dec 19 '17 at 9:53
 |Â
show 2 more comments
5
Even if you were from, for example EU and not from Montenegro you would have to apply to a US visa after a trip to Iran. That is, they perform extra checks on anyone who has been there.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 18:36
2
How hard/expensive would it be to renew your passport early? That might make the stamp go away...
â Erno de Weerd
Dec 18 '17 at 20:21
Well, not hard or expensive, but very slow. I'd rather not if I don't have to.
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 20:25
5
@ErnodeWeerd: I can only advise the OP against any smart-alec move to try to hide the fact that he has visited Iran.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 23:47
4
@QuoraFeans: Renewing your passport early, applying for a proper visa, and not lying about the Iran visit seems entirely reasonable. It reduces the chance of immigration officials making "mistakes".
â MSalters
Dec 19 '17 at 9:53
5
5
Even if you were from, for example EU and not from Montenegro you would have to apply to a US visa after a trip to Iran. That is, they perform extra checks on anyone who has been there.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 18:36
Even if you were from, for example EU and not from Montenegro you would have to apply to a US visa after a trip to Iran. That is, they perform extra checks on anyone who has been there.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 18:36
2
2
How hard/expensive would it be to renew your passport early? That might make the stamp go away...
â Erno de Weerd
Dec 18 '17 at 20:21
How hard/expensive would it be to renew your passport early? That might make the stamp go away...
â Erno de Weerd
Dec 18 '17 at 20:21
Well, not hard or expensive, but very slow. I'd rather not if I don't have to.
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 20:25
Well, not hard or expensive, but very slow. I'd rather not if I don't have to.
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 20:25
5
5
@ErnodeWeerd: I can only advise the OP against any smart-alec move to try to hide the fact that he has visited Iran.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 23:47
@ErnodeWeerd: I can only advise the OP against any smart-alec move to try to hide the fact that he has visited Iran.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 23:47
4
4
@QuoraFeans: Renewing your passport early, applying for a proper visa, and not lying about the Iran visit seems entirely reasonable. It reduces the chance of immigration officials making "mistakes".
â MSalters
Dec 19 '17 at 9:53
@QuoraFeans: Renewing your passport early, applying for a proper visa, and not lying about the Iran visit seems entirely reasonable. It reduces the chance of immigration officials making "mistakes".
â MSalters
Dec 19 '17 at 9:53
 |Â
show 2 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
51
down vote
accepted
Yes. Any country may deny anyone entry at the border, but if you send your passport to the embassy to get a visa then they already know your travel history. If you are given a visa then the immigration officer at the USA border shouldn't use that history as a reason to stop you. They might still have some other ordinary reason like they think you won't be able to pay your costs during your visit, or might work illegally.
4
I'll be going to the embassy in person for the visa interview, so I will be sure to address it. Also, there's a big, colourful, "Islamic state of Iran" visa page in my passport :)
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 16:09
3
Well, any non-citizen.
â Azor Ahai
Dec 18 '17 at 17:57
1
Yes, but I didn't want to digress!
â user16259
Dec 18 '17 at 18:39
3
Basically, a visa gives you the right to board your flight and go up to an immigration officer and request entry into the U.S. The immigration officer may or may not let you in.
â gparyani
Dec 18 '17 at 23:41
14
It's worth remembering that when the current president first attempted to introduce a ban on certain people entering America, the result was that many people with valid visas were turned away at the border, for a reason that they couldn't possibly have anticipated. So the actual reason for you to be turned away could be something entirely unexpected.
â Dawood ibn Kareem
Dec 19 '17 at 3:30
 |Â
show 7 more comments
up vote
13
down vote
It is clearly mentioned in a few answers here that a pre-issued visa is not an entry permission but a permission to travel to a port of entry and request that permission. So the person at immigration will not âÂÂoverride the embassyâÂÂs decisionâ but rather âÂÂcome to a different conclusion in their own decisionâÂÂ. For example, on the United States CBP website it says
Issuance of a visa does not guarantee entry to the United States. A visa simply indicates that a U.S. consular officer at an American embassy or consulate has reviewed the application and that officer has determined that the individual is eligible to enter the country for a specific purpose. The CBP Officer at the port-of-entry will conduct an inspection to determine if the individual is eligible for admission under U.S. immigration law. (source)
In most if not all countries, the decision of whether to let somebody enter the country or not is down to the immigration officer inspecting your documents at the immigration check (and maybe that officerâÂÂs supervisor). This means that you can still be refused if:
- people from your country generally donâÂÂt need visas
- there is a visa waiver agreement or similar for certain conditions requiring nationals of your country to submit certain information but not actually issuing a visa and you are eligible
- nationals of your country typically obtain visas on arrival and there is nothing prohibiting you from getting one
- you applied for and got granted a visa which is valid during your intended travel dates
One example for the last bullet point (unfortunately from the Schengen zone, not the US) is âÂÂDenied entry into Schengen zone: Can I still use my visa?â Therein, OP was denied entry to Germany because they could not satisfy the immigration officers that they wanted to leave (in a nutshell: OP had a flight from Germany home but no flight from Portugal to Germany).
Now of course, if you submitted all your documents in a timely manner and the embassy does decide to grant you a visa, then probabilities have suddenly drastically changed. In the overwhelming majority of cases, those applying for entry with a valid visa are let in â because the difficult cases are usually identified and weeded out at the visa application stage by rejecting them.
In your case, you mention that a previous trip to Iran is the basis of your uncertainty. The US embassy will have ample time to investigate your backgrounds and the details of that trip based on the documents you provide. If they come to the conclusion that you are admissable despite the Iran trip, that is very strong grounds for the immigration officer to consider that part handled and not make it affect his position.
It still bears repeating though, that it is all and entirely up to the immigration officer on duty and their superiors whether you are let in or not.
Is the first paragraph actually correct? At least a citation for the definition of a visa in the US would be warranted here, I think. I'm a bit skeptical.
â Mehrdad
Dec 19 '17 at 20:50
@Mehrdad See edit.
â Jan
Dec 20 '17 at 9:54
@Mehrdad How could it work otherwise? A system where a visa guaranteed entry would be impractical. Suppose someone is issued a visa and then shows up at the border and says "hi, I'm here to work illegally." Surely they wouldn't be admitted.
â Zach Lipton
Dec 20 '17 at 10:23
Jan: Thanks! @ZachLipton: The "how" is also in the 2nd sentence in the answer. The immigration officer would override the decision.
â Mehrdad
Dec 20 '17 at 10:25
1
@Mehrdad "Override" is not the correct term. The consular officer does not make any decision regarding your admission into the country, only regarding your eligibility for it.
â fkraiem
Dec 21 '17 at 4:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
It's always possible, but not likely.
I've been denied at a border for which I had a valid visa. It wasn't even anything personal, just that there were elections upcoming and they decided to close the border.
Fortunately, the country we had just left was reasonable, when we turned around they basically cancelled our leaving, thus allowing us back in despite not having valid visas. (We all had single entry visas which had already been used.)
Normally, US didn't have the right to send you back to the country which you couldn't enter legally. They should have sent you home.
â Dmitry Grigoryev
Dec 19 '17 at 11:30
1
@DmitryGrigoryev : I don't think the closed border was with US. The US doesn't close borders for elections.
â Martin Bonner
Dec 19 '17 at 15:36
1
@DmitryGrigoryev This wasn't the US. None of us needed a visa to enter the US. Furthermore, the reason the country we left let us back in was this was a land border. We couldn't just hop a plane with no airport about! I was simply making the point that you can never be sure you'll be allowed in somewhere.
â Loren Pechtel
Dec 19 '17 at 22:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
The immigration officer would need a reason that would make you inadmissible to deny you entry. A visit to Iran in itself is not a valid reason to deny entry. My friends who have visited Iraq many times have never had a problem going to the USA. Occasionally, they're questioned about their visits there, but "just visiting x y Z" is a good enough answer.
I don't understand why my answer has been downvoted. The immigration officers and their superiors will not deny you entry just because you visited Iran. They are not allowed to do that. If they do, you may request for redress. (https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/757/~/friend%2C-relative%2C-etc.-denied-entry-to-the-u.s.) The reason for your denial would be logged in the CBP system and would be considered during the redress process. It would be unlawful for an officer to deny entry for a reason that does not make the traveler inadmissible. A visit to Iran or Iraq does not make a traveler inadmissible.
You are concerned they may deny you entry on "security grounds." Visits to Iran do not make you a security threat.
While the final decision to let you in rests with the officers, it does not mean they are above the law. They have rules that they must follow and if violate any law they will be answerable.
5
Iran, Iraq, what's the difference?
â Robert Columbia
Dec 18 '17 at 20:52
8
@RobertColumbia About 25%.
â Michael Kjörling
Dec 18 '17 at 21:19
1
It is true that a visit by itself should not be enough to deny entry. At the same time, if the CBP officer does not want you to go into the US they will talk to you long enough until they can construct a reason. Then you may not be demonstrating sufficient ties to your home country or not have the funding required (even though both sound ludicrous). And the officers will likely have been in the business for long enough to know how to construct effectively. Still, giving you an upvote, especially for the redress part.
â Jan
Dec 19 '17 at 9:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Before starting to worry about being refused entry at the US border you should examine the relevant statistics from CBP:
On a typical day, CBP:
Processed 1,069,266 passengers and pedestrians
Refused 350 inadmissible persons at U.S. ports of entry
So your chances of being refused despite having a valid visa are 0.032%. Personally I find these odds good enough to completely avoid worrying about a possible denial of entry.
add a comment |Â
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
51
down vote
accepted
Yes. Any country may deny anyone entry at the border, but if you send your passport to the embassy to get a visa then they already know your travel history. If you are given a visa then the immigration officer at the USA border shouldn't use that history as a reason to stop you. They might still have some other ordinary reason like they think you won't be able to pay your costs during your visit, or might work illegally.
4
I'll be going to the embassy in person for the visa interview, so I will be sure to address it. Also, there's a big, colourful, "Islamic state of Iran" visa page in my passport :)
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 16:09
3
Well, any non-citizen.
â Azor Ahai
Dec 18 '17 at 17:57
1
Yes, but I didn't want to digress!
â user16259
Dec 18 '17 at 18:39
3
Basically, a visa gives you the right to board your flight and go up to an immigration officer and request entry into the U.S. The immigration officer may or may not let you in.
â gparyani
Dec 18 '17 at 23:41
14
It's worth remembering that when the current president first attempted to introduce a ban on certain people entering America, the result was that many people with valid visas were turned away at the border, for a reason that they couldn't possibly have anticipated. So the actual reason for you to be turned away could be something entirely unexpected.
â Dawood ibn Kareem
Dec 19 '17 at 3:30
 |Â
show 7 more comments
up vote
51
down vote
accepted
Yes. Any country may deny anyone entry at the border, but if you send your passport to the embassy to get a visa then they already know your travel history. If you are given a visa then the immigration officer at the USA border shouldn't use that history as a reason to stop you. They might still have some other ordinary reason like they think you won't be able to pay your costs during your visit, or might work illegally.
4
I'll be going to the embassy in person for the visa interview, so I will be sure to address it. Also, there's a big, colourful, "Islamic state of Iran" visa page in my passport :)
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 16:09
3
Well, any non-citizen.
â Azor Ahai
Dec 18 '17 at 17:57
1
Yes, but I didn't want to digress!
â user16259
Dec 18 '17 at 18:39
3
Basically, a visa gives you the right to board your flight and go up to an immigration officer and request entry into the U.S. The immigration officer may or may not let you in.
â gparyani
Dec 18 '17 at 23:41
14
It's worth remembering that when the current president first attempted to introduce a ban on certain people entering America, the result was that many people with valid visas were turned away at the border, for a reason that they couldn't possibly have anticipated. So the actual reason for you to be turned away could be something entirely unexpected.
â Dawood ibn Kareem
Dec 19 '17 at 3:30
 |Â
show 7 more comments
up vote
51
down vote
accepted
up vote
51
down vote
accepted
Yes. Any country may deny anyone entry at the border, but if you send your passport to the embassy to get a visa then they already know your travel history. If you are given a visa then the immigration officer at the USA border shouldn't use that history as a reason to stop you. They might still have some other ordinary reason like they think you won't be able to pay your costs during your visit, or might work illegally.
Yes. Any country may deny anyone entry at the border, but if you send your passport to the embassy to get a visa then they already know your travel history. If you are given a visa then the immigration officer at the USA border shouldn't use that history as a reason to stop you. They might still have some other ordinary reason like they think you won't be able to pay your costs during your visit, or might work illegally.
answered Dec 18 '17 at 14:04
user16259
3,593820
3,593820
4
I'll be going to the embassy in person for the visa interview, so I will be sure to address it. Also, there's a big, colourful, "Islamic state of Iran" visa page in my passport :)
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 16:09
3
Well, any non-citizen.
â Azor Ahai
Dec 18 '17 at 17:57
1
Yes, but I didn't want to digress!
â user16259
Dec 18 '17 at 18:39
3
Basically, a visa gives you the right to board your flight and go up to an immigration officer and request entry into the U.S. The immigration officer may or may not let you in.
â gparyani
Dec 18 '17 at 23:41
14
It's worth remembering that when the current president first attempted to introduce a ban on certain people entering America, the result was that many people with valid visas were turned away at the border, for a reason that they couldn't possibly have anticipated. So the actual reason for you to be turned away could be something entirely unexpected.
â Dawood ibn Kareem
Dec 19 '17 at 3:30
 |Â
show 7 more comments
4
I'll be going to the embassy in person for the visa interview, so I will be sure to address it. Also, there's a big, colourful, "Islamic state of Iran" visa page in my passport :)
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 16:09
3
Well, any non-citizen.
â Azor Ahai
Dec 18 '17 at 17:57
1
Yes, but I didn't want to digress!
â user16259
Dec 18 '17 at 18:39
3
Basically, a visa gives you the right to board your flight and go up to an immigration officer and request entry into the U.S. The immigration officer may or may not let you in.
â gparyani
Dec 18 '17 at 23:41
14
It's worth remembering that when the current president first attempted to introduce a ban on certain people entering America, the result was that many people with valid visas were turned away at the border, for a reason that they couldn't possibly have anticipated. So the actual reason for you to be turned away could be something entirely unexpected.
â Dawood ibn Kareem
Dec 19 '17 at 3:30
4
4
I'll be going to the embassy in person for the visa interview, so I will be sure to address it. Also, there's a big, colourful, "Islamic state of Iran" visa page in my passport :)
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 16:09
I'll be going to the embassy in person for the visa interview, so I will be sure to address it. Also, there's a big, colourful, "Islamic state of Iran" visa page in my passport :)
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 16:09
3
3
Well, any non-citizen.
â Azor Ahai
Dec 18 '17 at 17:57
Well, any non-citizen.
â Azor Ahai
Dec 18 '17 at 17:57
1
1
Yes, but I didn't want to digress!
â user16259
Dec 18 '17 at 18:39
Yes, but I didn't want to digress!
â user16259
Dec 18 '17 at 18:39
3
3
Basically, a visa gives you the right to board your flight and go up to an immigration officer and request entry into the U.S. The immigration officer may or may not let you in.
â gparyani
Dec 18 '17 at 23:41
Basically, a visa gives you the right to board your flight and go up to an immigration officer and request entry into the U.S. The immigration officer may or may not let you in.
â gparyani
Dec 18 '17 at 23:41
14
14
It's worth remembering that when the current president first attempted to introduce a ban on certain people entering America, the result was that many people with valid visas were turned away at the border, for a reason that they couldn't possibly have anticipated. So the actual reason for you to be turned away could be something entirely unexpected.
â Dawood ibn Kareem
Dec 19 '17 at 3:30
It's worth remembering that when the current president first attempted to introduce a ban on certain people entering America, the result was that many people with valid visas were turned away at the border, for a reason that they couldn't possibly have anticipated. So the actual reason for you to be turned away could be something entirely unexpected.
â Dawood ibn Kareem
Dec 19 '17 at 3:30
 |Â
show 7 more comments
up vote
13
down vote
It is clearly mentioned in a few answers here that a pre-issued visa is not an entry permission but a permission to travel to a port of entry and request that permission. So the person at immigration will not âÂÂoverride the embassyâÂÂs decisionâ but rather âÂÂcome to a different conclusion in their own decisionâÂÂ. For example, on the United States CBP website it says
Issuance of a visa does not guarantee entry to the United States. A visa simply indicates that a U.S. consular officer at an American embassy or consulate has reviewed the application and that officer has determined that the individual is eligible to enter the country for a specific purpose. The CBP Officer at the port-of-entry will conduct an inspection to determine if the individual is eligible for admission under U.S. immigration law. (source)
In most if not all countries, the decision of whether to let somebody enter the country or not is down to the immigration officer inspecting your documents at the immigration check (and maybe that officerâÂÂs supervisor). This means that you can still be refused if:
- people from your country generally donâÂÂt need visas
- there is a visa waiver agreement or similar for certain conditions requiring nationals of your country to submit certain information but not actually issuing a visa and you are eligible
- nationals of your country typically obtain visas on arrival and there is nothing prohibiting you from getting one
- you applied for and got granted a visa which is valid during your intended travel dates
One example for the last bullet point (unfortunately from the Schengen zone, not the US) is âÂÂDenied entry into Schengen zone: Can I still use my visa?â Therein, OP was denied entry to Germany because they could not satisfy the immigration officers that they wanted to leave (in a nutshell: OP had a flight from Germany home but no flight from Portugal to Germany).
Now of course, if you submitted all your documents in a timely manner and the embassy does decide to grant you a visa, then probabilities have suddenly drastically changed. In the overwhelming majority of cases, those applying for entry with a valid visa are let in â because the difficult cases are usually identified and weeded out at the visa application stage by rejecting them.
In your case, you mention that a previous trip to Iran is the basis of your uncertainty. The US embassy will have ample time to investigate your backgrounds and the details of that trip based on the documents you provide. If they come to the conclusion that you are admissable despite the Iran trip, that is very strong grounds for the immigration officer to consider that part handled and not make it affect his position.
It still bears repeating though, that it is all and entirely up to the immigration officer on duty and their superiors whether you are let in or not.
Is the first paragraph actually correct? At least a citation for the definition of a visa in the US would be warranted here, I think. I'm a bit skeptical.
â Mehrdad
Dec 19 '17 at 20:50
@Mehrdad See edit.
â Jan
Dec 20 '17 at 9:54
@Mehrdad How could it work otherwise? A system where a visa guaranteed entry would be impractical. Suppose someone is issued a visa and then shows up at the border and says "hi, I'm here to work illegally." Surely they wouldn't be admitted.
â Zach Lipton
Dec 20 '17 at 10:23
Jan: Thanks! @ZachLipton: The "how" is also in the 2nd sentence in the answer. The immigration officer would override the decision.
â Mehrdad
Dec 20 '17 at 10:25
1
@Mehrdad "Override" is not the correct term. The consular officer does not make any decision regarding your admission into the country, only regarding your eligibility for it.
â fkraiem
Dec 21 '17 at 4:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
13
down vote
It is clearly mentioned in a few answers here that a pre-issued visa is not an entry permission but a permission to travel to a port of entry and request that permission. So the person at immigration will not âÂÂoverride the embassyâÂÂs decisionâ but rather âÂÂcome to a different conclusion in their own decisionâÂÂ. For example, on the United States CBP website it says
Issuance of a visa does not guarantee entry to the United States. A visa simply indicates that a U.S. consular officer at an American embassy or consulate has reviewed the application and that officer has determined that the individual is eligible to enter the country for a specific purpose. The CBP Officer at the port-of-entry will conduct an inspection to determine if the individual is eligible for admission under U.S. immigration law. (source)
In most if not all countries, the decision of whether to let somebody enter the country or not is down to the immigration officer inspecting your documents at the immigration check (and maybe that officerâÂÂs supervisor). This means that you can still be refused if:
- people from your country generally donâÂÂt need visas
- there is a visa waiver agreement or similar for certain conditions requiring nationals of your country to submit certain information but not actually issuing a visa and you are eligible
- nationals of your country typically obtain visas on arrival and there is nothing prohibiting you from getting one
- you applied for and got granted a visa which is valid during your intended travel dates
One example for the last bullet point (unfortunately from the Schengen zone, not the US) is âÂÂDenied entry into Schengen zone: Can I still use my visa?â Therein, OP was denied entry to Germany because they could not satisfy the immigration officers that they wanted to leave (in a nutshell: OP had a flight from Germany home but no flight from Portugal to Germany).
Now of course, if you submitted all your documents in a timely manner and the embassy does decide to grant you a visa, then probabilities have suddenly drastically changed. In the overwhelming majority of cases, those applying for entry with a valid visa are let in â because the difficult cases are usually identified and weeded out at the visa application stage by rejecting them.
In your case, you mention that a previous trip to Iran is the basis of your uncertainty. The US embassy will have ample time to investigate your backgrounds and the details of that trip based on the documents you provide. If they come to the conclusion that you are admissable despite the Iran trip, that is very strong grounds for the immigration officer to consider that part handled and not make it affect his position.
It still bears repeating though, that it is all and entirely up to the immigration officer on duty and their superiors whether you are let in or not.
Is the first paragraph actually correct? At least a citation for the definition of a visa in the US would be warranted here, I think. I'm a bit skeptical.
â Mehrdad
Dec 19 '17 at 20:50
@Mehrdad See edit.
â Jan
Dec 20 '17 at 9:54
@Mehrdad How could it work otherwise? A system where a visa guaranteed entry would be impractical. Suppose someone is issued a visa and then shows up at the border and says "hi, I'm here to work illegally." Surely they wouldn't be admitted.
â Zach Lipton
Dec 20 '17 at 10:23
Jan: Thanks! @ZachLipton: The "how" is also in the 2nd sentence in the answer. The immigration officer would override the decision.
â Mehrdad
Dec 20 '17 at 10:25
1
@Mehrdad "Override" is not the correct term. The consular officer does not make any decision regarding your admission into the country, only regarding your eligibility for it.
â fkraiem
Dec 21 '17 at 4:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
13
down vote
up vote
13
down vote
It is clearly mentioned in a few answers here that a pre-issued visa is not an entry permission but a permission to travel to a port of entry and request that permission. So the person at immigration will not âÂÂoverride the embassyâÂÂs decisionâ but rather âÂÂcome to a different conclusion in their own decisionâÂÂ. For example, on the United States CBP website it says
Issuance of a visa does not guarantee entry to the United States. A visa simply indicates that a U.S. consular officer at an American embassy or consulate has reviewed the application and that officer has determined that the individual is eligible to enter the country for a specific purpose. The CBP Officer at the port-of-entry will conduct an inspection to determine if the individual is eligible for admission under U.S. immigration law. (source)
In most if not all countries, the decision of whether to let somebody enter the country or not is down to the immigration officer inspecting your documents at the immigration check (and maybe that officerâÂÂs supervisor). This means that you can still be refused if:
- people from your country generally donâÂÂt need visas
- there is a visa waiver agreement or similar for certain conditions requiring nationals of your country to submit certain information but not actually issuing a visa and you are eligible
- nationals of your country typically obtain visas on arrival and there is nothing prohibiting you from getting one
- you applied for and got granted a visa which is valid during your intended travel dates
One example for the last bullet point (unfortunately from the Schengen zone, not the US) is âÂÂDenied entry into Schengen zone: Can I still use my visa?â Therein, OP was denied entry to Germany because they could not satisfy the immigration officers that they wanted to leave (in a nutshell: OP had a flight from Germany home but no flight from Portugal to Germany).
Now of course, if you submitted all your documents in a timely manner and the embassy does decide to grant you a visa, then probabilities have suddenly drastically changed. In the overwhelming majority of cases, those applying for entry with a valid visa are let in â because the difficult cases are usually identified and weeded out at the visa application stage by rejecting them.
In your case, you mention that a previous trip to Iran is the basis of your uncertainty. The US embassy will have ample time to investigate your backgrounds and the details of that trip based on the documents you provide. If they come to the conclusion that you are admissable despite the Iran trip, that is very strong grounds for the immigration officer to consider that part handled and not make it affect his position.
It still bears repeating though, that it is all and entirely up to the immigration officer on duty and their superiors whether you are let in or not.
It is clearly mentioned in a few answers here that a pre-issued visa is not an entry permission but a permission to travel to a port of entry and request that permission. So the person at immigration will not âÂÂoverride the embassyâÂÂs decisionâ but rather âÂÂcome to a different conclusion in their own decisionâÂÂ. For example, on the United States CBP website it says
Issuance of a visa does not guarantee entry to the United States. A visa simply indicates that a U.S. consular officer at an American embassy or consulate has reviewed the application and that officer has determined that the individual is eligible to enter the country for a specific purpose. The CBP Officer at the port-of-entry will conduct an inspection to determine if the individual is eligible for admission under U.S. immigration law. (source)
In most if not all countries, the decision of whether to let somebody enter the country or not is down to the immigration officer inspecting your documents at the immigration check (and maybe that officerâÂÂs supervisor). This means that you can still be refused if:
- people from your country generally donâÂÂt need visas
- there is a visa waiver agreement or similar for certain conditions requiring nationals of your country to submit certain information but not actually issuing a visa and you are eligible
- nationals of your country typically obtain visas on arrival and there is nothing prohibiting you from getting one
- you applied for and got granted a visa which is valid during your intended travel dates
One example for the last bullet point (unfortunately from the Schengen zone, not the US) is âÂÂDenied entry into Schengen zone: Can I still use my visa?â Therein, OP was denied entry to Germany because they could not satisfy the immigration officers that they wanted to leave (in a nutshell: OP had a flight from Germany home but no flight from Portugal to Germany).
Now of course, if you submitted all your documents in a timely manner and the embassy does decide to grant you a visa, then probabilities have suddenly drastically changed. In the overwhelming majority of cases, those applying for entry with a valid visa are let in â because the difficult cases are usually identified and weeded out at the visa application stage by rejecting them.
In your case, you mention that a previous trip to Iran is the basis of your uncertainty. The US embassy will have ample time to investigate your backgrounds and the details of that trip based on the documents you provide. If they come to the conclusion that you are admissable despite the Iran trip, that is very strong grounds for the immigration officer to consider that part handled and not make it affect his position.
It still bears repeating though, that it is all and entirely up to the immigration officer on duty and their superiors whether you are let in or not.
edited Dec 20 '17 at 9:54
answered Dec 19 '17 at 4:58
Jan
10.4k33766
10.4k33766
Is the first paragraph actually correct? At least a citation for the definition of a visa in the US would be warranted here, I think. I'm a bit skeptical.
â Mehrdad
Dec 19 '17 at 20:50
@Mehrdad See edit.
â Jan
Dec 20 '17 at 9:54
@Mehrdad How could it work otherwise? A system where a visa guaranteed entry would be impractical. Suppose someone is issued a visa and then shows up at the border and says "hi, I'm here to work illegally." Surely they wouldn't be admitted.
â Zach Lipton
Dec 20 '17 at 10:23
Jan: Thanks! @ZachLipton: The "how" is also in the 2nd sentence in the answer. The immigration officer would override the decision.
â Mehrdad
Dec 20 '17 at 10:25
1
@Mehrdad "Override" is not the correct term. The consular officer does not make any decision regarding your admission into the country, only regarding your eligibility for it.
â fkraiem
Dec 21 '17 at 4:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
Is the first paragraph actually correct? At least a citation for the definition of a visa in the US would be warranted here, I think. I'm a bit skeptical.
â Mehrdad
Dec 19 '17 at 20:50
@Mehrdad See edit.
â Jan
Dec 20 '17 at 9:54
@Mehrdad How could it work otherwise? A system where a visa guaranteed entry would be impractical. Suppose someone is issued a visa and then shows up at the border and says "hi, I'm here to work illegally." Surely they wouldn't be admitted.
â Zach Lipton
Dec 20 '17 at 10:23
Jan: Thanks! @ZachLipton: The "how" is also in the 2nd sentence in the answer. The immigration officer would override the decision.
â Mehrdad
Dec 20 '17 at 10:25
1
@Mehrdad "Override" is not the correct term. The consular officer does not make any decision regarding your admission into the country, only regarding your eligibility for it.
â fkraiem
Dec 21 '17 at 4:08
Is the first paragraph actually correct? At least a citation for the definition of a visa in the US would be warranted here, I think. I'm a bit skeptical.
â Mehrdad
Dec 19 '17 at 20:50
Is the first paragraph actually correct? At least a citation for the definition of a visa in the US would be warranted here, I think. I'm a bit skeptical.
â Mehrdad
Dec 19 '17 at 20:50
@Mehrdad See edit.
â Jan
Dec 20 '17 at 9:54
@Mehrdad See edit.
â Jan
Dec 20 '17 at 9:54
@Mehrdad How could it work otherwise? A system where a visa guaranteed entry would be impractical. Suppose someone is issued a visa and then shows up at the border and says "hi, I'm here to work illegally." Surely they wouldn't be admitted.
â Zach Lipton
Dec 20 '17 at 10:23
@Mehrdad How could it work otherwise? A system where a visa guaranteed entry would be impractical. Suppose someone is issued a visa and then shows up at the border and says "hi, I'm here to work illegally." Surely they wouldn't be admitted.
â Zach Lipton
Dec 20 '17 at 10:23
Jan: Thanks! @ZachLipton: The "how" is also in the 2nd sentence in the answer. The immigration officer would override the decision.
â Mehrdad
Dec 20 '17 at 10:25
Jan: Thanks! @ZachLipton: The "how" is also in the 2nd sentence in the answer. The immigration officer would override the decision.
â Mehrdad
Dec 20 '17 at 10:25
1
1
@Mehrdad "Override" is not the correct term. The consular officer does not make any decision regarding your admission into the country, only regarding your eligibility for it.
â fkraiem
Dec 21 '17 at 4:08
@Mehrdad "Override" is not the correct term. The consular officer does not make any decision regarding your admission into the country, only regarding your eligibility for it.
â fkraiem
Dec 21 '17 at 4:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
It's always possible, but not likely.
I've been denied at a border for which I had a valid visa. It wasn't even anything personal, just that there were elections upcoming and they decided to close the border.
Fortunately, the country we had just left was reasonable, when we turned around they basically cancelled our leaving, thus allowing us back in despite not having valid visas. (We all had single entry visas which had already been used.)
Normally, US didn't have the right to send you back to the country which you couldn't enter legally. They should have sent you home.
â Dmitry Grigoryev
Dec 19 '17 at 11:30
1
@DmitryGrigoryev : I don't think the closed border was with US. The US doesn't close borders for elections.
â Martin Bonner
Dec 19 '17 at 15:36
1
@DmitryGrigoryev This wasn't the US. None of us needed a visa to enter the US. Furthermore, the reason the country we left let us back in was this was a land border. We couldn't just hop a plane with no airport about! I was simply making the point that you can never be sure you'll be allowed in somewhere.
â Loren Pechtel
Dec 19 '17 at 22:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
It's always possible, but not likely.
I've been denied at a border for which I had a valid visa. It wasn't even anything personal, just that there were elections upcoming and they decided to close the border.
Fortunately, the country we had just left was reasonable, when we turned around they basically cancelled our leaving, thus allowing us back in despite not having valid visas. (We all had single entry visas which had already been used.)
Normally, US didn't have the right to send you back to the country which you couldn't enter legally. They should have sent you home.
â Dmitry Grigoryev
Dec 19 '17 at 11:30
1
@DmitryGrigoryev : I don't think the closed border was with US. The US doesn't close borders for elections.
â Martin Bonner
Dec 19 '17 at 15:36
1
@DmitryGrigoryev This wasn't the US. None of us needed a visa to enter the US. Furthermore, the reason the country we left let us back in was this was a land border. We couldn't just hop a plane with no airport about! I was simply making the point that you can never be sure you'll be allowed in somewhere.
â Loren Pechtel
Dec 19 '17 at 22:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
It's always possible, but not likely.
I've been denied at a border for which I had a valid visa. It wasn't even anything personal, just that there were elections upcoming and they decided to close the border.
Fortunately, the country we had just left was reasonable, when we turned around they basically cancelled our leaving, thus allowing us back in despite not having valid visas. (We all had single entry visas which had already been used.)
It's always possible, but not likely.
I've been denied at a border for which I had a valid visa. It wasn't even anything personal, just that there were elections upcoming and they decided to close the border.
Fortunately, the country we had just left was reasonable, when we turned around they basically cancelled our leaving, thus allowing us back in despite not having valid visas. (We all had single entry visas which had already been used.)
answered Dec 19 '17 at 5:12
Loren Pechtel
5,1471624
5,1471624
Normally, US didn't have the right to send you back to the country which you couldn't enter legally. They should have sent you home.
â Dmitry Grigoryev
Dec 19 '17 at 11:30
1
@DmitryGrigoryev : I don't think the closed border was with US. The US doesn't close borders for elections.
â Martin Bonner
Dec 19 '17 at 15:36
1
@DmitryGrigoryev This wasn't the US. None of us needed a visa to enter the US. Furthermore, the reason the country we left let us back in was this was a land border. We couldn't just hop a plane with no airport about! I was simply making the point that you can never be sure you'll be allowed in somewhere.
â Loren Pechtel
Dec 19 '17 at 22:38
add a comment |Â
Normally, US didn't have the right to send you back to the country which you couldn't enter legally. They should have sent you home.
â Dmitry Grigoryev
Dec 19 '17 at 11:30
1
@DmitryGrigoryev : I don't think the closed border was with US. The US doesn't close borders for elections.
â Martin Bonner
Dec 19 '17 at 15:36
1
@DmitryGrigoryev This wasn't the US. None of us needed a visa to enter the US. Furthermore, the reason the country we left let us back in was this was a land border. We couldn't just hop a plane with no airport about! I was simply making the point that you can never be sure you'll be allowed in somewhere.
â Loren Pechtel
Dec 19 '17 at 22:38
Normally, US didn't have the right to send you back to the country which you couldn't enter legally. They should have sent you home.
â Dmitry Grigoryev
Dec 19 '17 at 11:30
Normally, US didn't have the right to send you back to the country which you couldn't enter legally. They should have sent you home.
â Dmitry Grigoryev
Dec 19 '17 at 11:30
1
1
@DmitryGrigoryev : I don't think the closed border was with US. The US doesn't close borders for elections.
â Martin Bonner
Dec 19 '17 at 15:36
@DmitryGrigoryev : I don't think the closed border was with US. The US doesn't close borders for elections.
â Martin Bonner
Dec 19 '17 at 15:36
1
1
@DmitryGrigoryev This wasn't the US. None of us needed a visa to enter the US. Furthermore, the reason the country we left let us back in was this was a land border. We couldn't just hop a plane with no airport about! I was simply making the point that you can never be sure you'll be allowed in somewhere.
â Loren Pechtel
Dec 19 '17 at 22:38
@DmitryGrigoryev This wasn't the US. None of us needed a visa to enter the US. Furthermore, the reason the country we left let us back in was this was a land border. We couldn't just hop a plane with no airport about! I was simply making the point that you can never be sure you'll be allowed in somewhere.
â Loren Pechtel
Dec 19 '17 at 22:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
The immigration officer would need a reason that would make you inadmissible to deny you entry. A visit to Iran in itself is not a valid reason to deny entry. My friends who have visited Iraq many times have never had a problem going to the USA. Occasionally, they're questioned about their visits there, but "just visiting x y Z" is a good enough answer.
I don't understand why my answer has been downvoted. The immigration officers and their superiors will not deny you entry just because you visited Iran. They are not allowed to do that. If they do, you may request for redress. (https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/757/~/friend%2C-relative%2C-etc.-denied-entry-to-the-u.s.) The reason for your denial would be logged in the CBP system and would be considered during the redress process. It would be unlawful for an officer to deny entry for a reason that does not make the traveler inadmissible. A visit to Iran or Iraq does not make a traveler inadmissible.
You are concerned they may deny you entry on "security grounds." Visits to Iran do not make you a security threat.
While the final decision to let you in rests with the officers, it does not mean they are above the law. They have rules that they must follow and if violate any law they will be answerable.
5
Iran, Iraq, what's the difference?
â Robert Columbia
Dec 18 '17 at 20:52
8
@RobertColumbia About 25%.
â Michael Kjörling
Dec 18 '17 at 21:19
1
It is true that a visit by itself should not be enough to deny entry. At the same time, if the CBP officer does not want you to go into the US they will talk to you long enough until they can construct a reason. Then you may not be demonstrating sufficient ties to your home country or not have the funding required (even though both sound ludicrous). And the officers will likely have been in the business for long enough to know how to construct effectively. Still, giving you an upvote, especially for the redress part.
â Jan
Dec 19 '17 at 9:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
The immigration officer would need a reason that would make you inadmissible to deny you entry. A visit to Iran in itself is not a valid reason to deny entry. My friends who have visited Iraq many times have never had a problem going to the USA. Occasionally, they're questioned about their visits there, but "just visiting x y Z" is a good enough answer.
I don't understand why my answer has been downvoted. The immigration officers and their superiors will not deny you entry just because you visited Iran. They are not allowed to do that. If they do, you may request for redress. (https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/757/~/friend%2C-relative%2C-etc.-denied-entry-to-the-u.s.) The reason for your denial would be logged in the CBP system and would be considered during the redress process. It would be unlawful for an officer to deny entry for a reason that does not make the traveler inadmissible. A visit to Iran or Iraq does not make a traveler inadmissible.
You are concerned they may deny you entry on "security grounds." Visits to Iran do not make you a security threat.
While the final decision to let you in rests with the officers, it does not mean they are above the law. They have rules that they must follow and if violate any law they will be answerable.
5
Iran, Iraq, what's the difference?
â Robert Columbia
Dec 18 '17 at 20:52
8
@RobertColumbia About 25%.
â Michael Kjörling
Dec 18 '17 at 21:19
1
It is true that a visit by itself should not be enough to deny entry. At the same time, if the CBP officer does not want you to go into the US they will talk to you long enough until they can construct a reason. Then you may not be demonstrating sufficient ties to your home country or not have the funding required (even though both sound ludicrous). And the officers will likely have been in the business for long enough to know how to construct effectively. Still, giving you an upvote, especially for the redress part.
â Jan
Dec 19 '17 at 9:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
The immigration officer would need a reason that would make you inadmissible to deny you entry. A visit to Iran in itself is not a valid reason to deny entry. My friends who have visited Iraq many times have never had a problem going to the USA. Occasionally, they're questioned about their visits there, but "just visiting x y Z" is a good enough answer.
I don't understand why my answer has been downvoted. The immigration officers and their superiors will not deny you entry just because you visited Iran. They are not allowed to do that. If they do, you may request for redress. (https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/757/~/friend%2C-relative%2C-etc.-denied-entry-to-the-u.s.) The reason for your denial would be logged in the CBP system and would be considered during the redress process. It would be unlawful for an officer to deny entry for a reason that does not make the traveler inadmissible. A visit to Iran or Iraq does not make a traveler inadmissible.
You are concerned they may deny you entry on "security grounds." Visits to Iran do not make you a security threat.
While the final decision to let you in rests with the officers, it does not mean they are above the law. They have rules that they must follow and if violate any law they will be answerable.
The immigration officer would need a reason that would make you inadmissible to deny you entry. A visit to Iran in itself is not a valid reason to deny entry. My friends who have visited Iraq many times have never had a problem going to the USA. Occasionally, they're questioned about their visits there, but "just visiting x y Z" is a good enough answer.
I don't understand why my answer has been downvoted. The immigration officers and their superiors will not deny you entry just because you visited Iran. They are not allowed to do that. If they do, you may request for redress. (https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/757/~/friend%2C-relative%2C-etc.-denied-entry-to-the-u.s.) The reason for your denial would be logged in the CBP system and would be considered during the redress process. It would be unlawful for an officer to deny entry for a reason that does not make the traveler inadmissible. A visit to Iran or Iraq does not make a traveler inadmissible.
You are concerned they may deny you entry on "security grounds." Visits to Iran do not make you a security threat.
While the final decision to let you in rests with the officers, it does not mean they are above the law. They have rules that they must follow and if violate any law they will be answerable.
edited Dec 19 '17 at 9:28
answered Dec 18 '17 at 20:45
greatone
2,128928
2,128928
5
Iran, Iraq, what's the difference?
â Robert Columbia
Dec 18 '17 at 20:52
8
@RobertColumbia About 25%.
â Michael Kjörling
Dec 18 '17 at 21:19
1
It is true that a visit by itself should not be enough to deny entry. At the same time, if the CBP officer does not want you to go into the US they will talk to you long enough until they can construct a reason. Then you may not be demonstrating sufficient ties to your home country or not have the funding required (even though both sound ludicrous). And the officers will likely have been in the business for long enough to know how to construct effectively. Still, giving you an upvote, especially for the redress part.
â Jan
Dec 19 '17 at 9:41
add a comment |Â
5
Iran, Iraq, what's the difference?
â Robert Columbia
Dec 18 '17 at 20:52
8
@RobertColumbia About 25%.
â Michael Kjörling
Dec 18 '17 at 21:19
1
It is true that a visit by itself should not be enough to deny entry. At the same time, if the CBP officer does not want you to go into the US they will talk to you long enough until they can construct a reason. Then you may not be demonstrating sufficient ties to your home country or not have the funding required (even though both sound ludicrous). And the officers will likely have been in the business for long enough to know how to construct effectively. Still, giving you an upvote, especially for the redress part.
â Jan
Dec 19 '17 at 9:41
5
5
Iran, Iraq, what's the difference?
â Robert Columbia
Dec 18 '17 at 20:52
Iran, Iraq, what's the difference?
â Robert Columbia
Dec 18 '17 at 20:52
8
8
@RobertColumbia About 25%.
â Michael Kjörling
Dec 18 '17 at 21:19
@RobertColumbia About 25%.
â Michael Kjörling
Dec 18 '17 at 21:19
1
1
It is true that a visit by itself should not be enough to deny entry. At the same time, if the CBP officer does not want you to go into the US they will talk to you long enough until they can construct a reason. Then you may not be demonstrating sufficient ties to your home country or not have the funding required (even though both sound ludicrous). And the officers will likely have been in the business for long enough to know how to construct effectively. Still, giving you an upvote, especially for the redress part.
â Jan
Dec 19 '17 at 9:41
It is true that a visit by itself should not be enough to deny entry. At the same time, if the CBP officer does not want you to go into the US they will talk to you long enough until they can construct a reason. Then you may not be demonstrating sufficient ties to your home country or not have the funding required (even though both sound ludicrous). And the officers will likely have been in the business for long enough to know how to construct effectively. Still, giving you an upvote, especially for the redress part.
â Jan
Dec 19 '17 at 9:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Before starting to worry about being refused entry at the US border you should examine the relevant statistics from CBP:
On a typical day, CBP:
Processed 1,069,266 passengers and pedestrians
Refused 350 inadmissible persons at U.S. ports of entry
So your chances of being refused despite having a valid visa are 0.032%. Personally I find these odds good enough to completely avoid worrying about a possible denial of entry.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Before starting to worry about being refused entry at the US border you should examine the relevant statistics from CBP:
On a typical day, CBP:
Processed 1,069,266 passengers and pedestrians
Refused 350 inadmissible persons at U.S. ports of entry
So your chances of being refused despite having a valid visa are 0.032%. Personally I find these odds good enough to completely avoid worrying about a possible denial of entry.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Before starting to worry about being refused entry at the US border you should examine the relevant statistics from CBP:
On a typical day, CBP:
Processed 1,069,266 passengers and pedestrians
Refused 350 inadmissible persons at U.S. ports of entry
So your chances of being refused despite having a valid visa are 0.032%. Personally I find these odds good enough to completely avoid worrying about a possible denial of entry.
Before starting to worry about being refused entry at the US border you should examine the relevant statistics from CBP:
On a typical day, CBP:
Processed 1,069,266 passengers and pedestrians
Refused 350 inadmissible persons at U.S. ports of entry
So your chances of being refused despite having a valid visa are 0.032%. Personally I find these odds good enough to completely avoid worrying about a possible denial of entry.
answered Dec 22 '17 at 13:18
JonathanReezâ¦
46.6k36214458
46.6k36214458
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106944%2fis-it-possible-to-be-denied-entry-into-usa-after-being-granted-a-tourist-visa-by%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
5
Even if you were from, for example EU and not from Montenegro you would have to apply to a US visa after a trip to Iran. That is, they perform extra checks on anyone who has been there.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 18:36
2
How hard/expensive would it be to renew your passport early? That might make the stamp go away...
â Erno de Weerd
Dec 18 '17 at 20:21
Well, not hard or expensive, but very slow. I'd rather not if I don't have to.
â jovan
Dec 18 '17 at 20:25
5
@ErnodeWeerd: I can only advise the OP against any smart-alec move to try to hide the fact that he has visited Iran.
â Quora Feans
Dec 18 '17 at 23:47
4
@QuoraFeans: Renewing your passport early, applying for a proper visa, and not lying about the Iran visit seems entirely reasonable. It reduces the chance of immigration officials making "mistakes".
â MSalters
Dec 19 '17 at 9:53