Using multiple-entry 'turismo' schengen visa for business
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I am an Indian national, currently living in the United States under a non-residence visa. I recently applied for and received a short-stay multiple-entry Schengen visa from the Italian consulate where I live and the visa explicitly states the visa type as "Turismo". I intended to use the visa to visit Milan as a tourist for a few days during Easter, with a short-stay in Geneva, Switzerland, for business purposes, and back to Milan for my flight back to the US.
However, due to several reasons, including the current security situation in Europe, I have had to shorten my stay in Milan. Therefore, I now want to land in Milan as originally intended, but instead of staying in Milan for tourism, I will be taking a train directly to Geneva for business and back to Milan a few days later for my flight back. I am thus essentially transiting via Italy.
Seeing as that the purpose of my visit has slightly changed, will this cause problems for me at Italian immigration?
Edit - I apologize for the confusion. My visa is of type 'multiple-entry'.
schengen italy switzerland change-purpose-of-travel
|
show 2 more comments
I am an Indian national, currently living in the United States under a non-residence visa. I recently applied for and received a short-stay multiple-entry Schengen visa from the Italian consulate where I live and the visa explicitly states the visa type as "Turismo". I intended to use the visa to visit Milan as a tourist for a few days during Easter, with a short-stay in Geneva, Switzerland, for business purposes, and back to Milan for my flight back to the US.
However, due to several reasons, including the current security situation in Europe, I have had to shorten my stay in Milan. Therefore, I now want to land in Milan as originally intended, but instead of staying in Milan for tourism, I will be taking a train directly to Geneva for business and back to Milan a few days later for my flight back. I am thus essentially transiting via Italy.
Seeing as that the purpose of my visit has slightly changed, will this cause problems for me at Italian immigration?
Edit - I apologize for the confusion. My visa is of type 'multiple-entry'.
schengen italy switzerland change-purpose-of-travel
If you are on a single entry visa, then you're not allowed back into Milan once you leave the country to Geneva. You need to have a multiple entry visa.
– Prashanth
Mar 24 '16 at 4:28
1
What does your visa state on the first line, "VALID FOR"?
– Michael Hampton
Mar 24 '16 at 4:48
@Prashanth I apologize for the confusion. I have edited my question. I have a multiple-entry Schengen visa. My main issue is the change in purpose of travel that the visa was originally issued for.
– Pastafarian
Mar 24 '16 at 4:51
5
Honestly, there is no “security situation in Europe” that justifies shortening trips to Italy.
– Relaxed
Mar 24 '16 at 7:00
2
@Prashanth A trip from Italy to Switzerland and back does not leave the Schengen area, so it can be done with a single entry visa.
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:02
|
show 2 more comments
I am an Indian national, currently living in the United States under a non-residence visa. I recently applied for and received a short-stay multiple-entry Schengen visa from the Italian consulate where I live and the visa explicitly states the visa type as "Turismo". I intended to use the visa to visit Milan as a tourist for a few days during Easter, with a short-stay in Geneva, Switzerland, for business purposes, and back to Milan for my flight back to the US.
However, due to several reasons, including the current security situation in Europe, I have had to shorten my stay in Milan. Therefore, I now want to land in Milan as originally intended, but instead of staying in Milan for tourism, I will be taking a train directly to Geneva for business and back to Milan a few days later for my flight back. I am thus essentially transiting via Italy.
Seeing as that the purpose of my visit has slightly changed, will this cause problems for me at Italian immigration?
Edit - I apologize for the confusion. My visa is of type 'multiple-entry'.
schengen italy switzerland change-purpose-of-travel
I am an Indian national, currently living in the United States under a non-residence visa. I recently applied for and received a short-stay multiple-entry Schengen visa from the Italian consulate where I live and the visa explicitly states the visa type as "Turismo". I intended to use the visa to visit Milan as a tourist for a few days during Easter, with a short-stay in Geneva, Switzerland, for business purposes, and back to Milan for my flight back to the US.
However, due to several reasons, including the current security situation in Europe, I have had to shorten my stay in Milan. Therefore, I now want to land in Milan as originally intended, but instead of staying in Milan for tourism, I will be taking a train directly to Geneva for business and back to Milan a few days later for my flight back. I am thus essentially transiting via Italy.
Seeing as that the purpose of my visit has slightly changed, will this cause problems for me at Italian immigration?
Edit - I apologize for the confusion. My visa is of type 'multiple-entry'.
schengen italy switzerland change-purpose-of-travel
schengen italy switzerland change-purpose-of-travel
edited Mar 24 '16 at 4:50
Pastafarian
asked Mar 24 '16 at 3:30
PastafarianPastafarian
1012
1012
If you are on a single entry visa, then you're not allowed back into Milan once you leave the country to Geneva. You need to have a multiple entry visa.
– Prashanth
Mar 24 '16 at 4:28
1
What does your visa state on the first line, "VALID FOR"?
– Michael Hampton
Mar 24 '16 at 4:48
@Prashanth I apologize for the confusion. I have edited my question. I have a multiple-entry Schengen visa. My main issue is the change in purpose of travel that the visa was originally issued for.
– Pastafarian
Mar 24 '16 at 4:51
5
Honestly, there is no “security situation in Europe” that justifies shortening trips to Italy.
– Relaxed
Mar 24 '16 at 7:00
2
@Prashanth A trip from Italy to Switzerland and back does not leave the Schengen area, so it can be done with a single entry visa.
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:02
|
show 2 more comments
If you are on a single entry visa, then you're not allowed back into Milan once you leave the country to Geneva. You need to have a multiple entry visa.
– Prashanth
Mar 24 '16 at 4:28
1
What does your visa state on the first line, "VALID FOR"?
– Michael Hampton
Mar 24 '16 at 4:48
@Prashanth I apologize for the confusion. I have edited my question. I have a multiple-entry Schengen visa. My main issue is the change in purpose of travel that the visa was originally issued for.
– Pastafarian
Mar 24 '16 at 4:51
5
Honestly, there is no “security situation in Europe” that justifies shortening trips to Italy.
– Relaxed
Mar 24 '16 at 7:00
2
@Prashanth A trip from Italy to Switzerland and back does not leave the Schengen area, so it can be done with a single entry visa.
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:02
If you are on a single entry visa, then you're not allowed back into Milan once you leave the country to Geneva. You need to have a multiple entry visa.
– Prashanth
Mar 24 '16 at 4:28
If you are on a single entry visa, then you're not allowed back into Milan once you leave the country to Geneva. You need to have a multiple entry visa.
– Prashanth
Mar 24 '16 at 4:28
1
1
What does your visa state on the first line, "VALID FOR"?
– Michael Hampton
Mar 24 '16 at 4:48
What does your visa state on the first line, "VALID FOR"?
– Michael Hampton
Mar 24 '16 at 4:48
@Prashanth I apologize for the confusion. I have edited my question. I have a multiple-entry Schengen visa. My main issue is the change in purpose of travel that the visa was originally issued for.
– Pastafarian
Mar 24 '16 at 4:51
@Prashanth I apologize for the confusion. I have edited my question. I have a multiple-entry Schengen visa. My main issue is the change in purpose of travel that the visa was originally issued for.
– Pastafarian
Mar 24 '16 at 4:51
5
5
Honestly, there is no “security situation in Europe” that justifies shortening trips to Italy.
– Relaxed
Mar 24 '16 at 7:00
Honestly, there is no “security situation in Europe” that justifies shortening trips to Italy.
– Relaxed
Mar 24 '16 at 7:00
2
2
@Prashanth A trip from Italy to Switzerland and back does not leave the Schengen area, so it can be done with a single entry visa.
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:02
@Prashanth A trip from Italy to Switzerland and back does not leave the Schengen area, so it can be done with a single entry visa.
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:02
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is no such thing as pre-defined visa types or categories limited to certain purposes in the Schengen regulations. Furthermore, many things in the regulations and other associated documents clearly show that multiple-entry visas in particular are intended to cover completely different trips.
So I am not sure exactly what the Italian authorities are thinking when they add non-standard annotations like “turismo” but I see no legal basis for any restriction of your visa to certain purposes.
2
Another possible concern is that Italy is no longer the "main destination."
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:41
@phoog Precisely my concern.
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 2:11
2
@user2364450 If you have time to get a new visa, that would be the safest thing, but I suspect that if you have a reasonable explanation for changing your itinerary after the visa was granted, you will be okay. It is certainly true that you are allowed to travel using your multiple entry visa for any purpose allowed under a short-stay visa, business, pleasure, or otherwise.
– phoog
Mar 25 '16 at 2:40
@phoog Not possible, as my flight's tomorrow!
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 13:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65624%2fusing-multiple-entry-turismo-schengen-visa-for-business%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is no such thing as pre-defined visa types or categories limited to certain purposes in the Schengen regulations. Furthermore, many things in the regulations and other associated documents clearly show that multiple-entry visas in particular are intended to cover completely different trips.
So I am not sure exactly what the Italian authorities are thinking when they add non-standard annotations like “turismo” but I see no legal basis for any restriction of your visa to certain purposes.
2
Another possible concern is that Italy is no longer the "main destination."
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:41
@phoog Precisely my concern.
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 2:11
2
@user2364450 If you have time to get a new visa, that would be the safest thing, but I suspect that if you have a reasonable explanation for changing your itinerary after the visa was granted, you will be okay. It is certainly true that you are allowed to travel using your multiple entry visa for any purpose allowed under a short-stay visa, business, pleasure, or otherwise.
– phoog
Mar 25 '16 at 2:40
@phoog Not possible, as my flight's tomorrow!
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 13:32
add a comment |
There is no such thing as pre-defined visa types or categories limited to certain purposes in the Schengen regulations. Furthermore, many things in the regulations and other associated documents clearly show that multiple-entry visas in particular are intended to cover completely different trips.
So I am not sure exactly what the Italian authorities are thinking when they add non-standard annotations like “turismo” but I see no legal basis for any restriction of your visa to certain purposes.
2
Another possible concern is that Italy is no longer the "main destination."
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:41
@phoog Precisely my concern.
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 2:11
2
@user2364450 If you have time to get a new visa, that would be the safest thing, but I suspect that if you have a reasonable explanation for changing your itinerary after the visa was granted, you will be okay. It is certainly true that you are allowed to travel using your multiple entry visa for any purpose allowed under a short-stay visa, business, pleasure, or otherwise.
– phoog
Mar 25 '16 at 2:40
@phoog Not possible, as my flight's tomorrow!
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 13:32
add a comment |
There is no such thing as pre-defined visa types or categories limited to certain purposes in the Schengen regulations. Furthermore, many things in the regulations and other associated documents clearly show that multiple-entry visas in particular are intended to cover completely different trips.
So I am not sure exactly what the Italian authorities are thinking when they add non-standard annotations like “turismo” but I see no legal basis for any restriction of your visa to certain purposes.
There is no such thing as pre-defined visa types or categories limited to certain purposes in the Schengen regulations. Furthermore, many things in the regulations and other associated documents clearly show that multiple-entry visas in particular are intended to cover completely different trips.
So I am not sure exactly what the Italian authorities are thinking when they add non-standard annotations like “turismo” but I see no legal basis for any restriction of your visa to certain purposes.
answered Mar 24 '16 at 7:01
RelaxedRelaxed
77k10156292
77k10156292
2
Another possible concern is that Italy is no longer the "main destination."
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:41
@phoog Precisely my concern.
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 2:11
2
@user2364450 If you have time to get a new visa, that would be the safest thing, but I suspect that if you have a reasonable explanation for changing your itinerary after the visa was granted, you will be okay. It is certainly true that you are allowed to travel using your multiple entry visa for any purpose allowed under a short-stay visa, business, pleasure, or otherwise.
– phoog
Mar 25 '16 at 2:40
@phoog Not possible, as my flight's tomorrow!
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 13:32
add a comment |
2
Another possible concern is that Italy is no longer the "main destination."
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:41
@phoog Precisely my concern.
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 2:11
2
@user2364450 If you have time to get a new visa, that would be the safest thing, but I suspect that if you have a reasonable explanation for changing your itinerary after the visa was granted, you will be okay. It is certainly true that you are allowed to travel using your multiple entry visa for any purpose allowed under a short-stay visa, business, pleasure, or otherwise.
– phoog
Mar 25 '16 at 2:40
@phoog Not possible, as my flight's tomorrow!
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 13:32
2
2
Another possible concern is that Italy is no longer the "main destination."
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:41
Another possible concern is that Italy is no longer the "main destination."
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:41
@phoog Precisely my concern.
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 2:11
@phoog Precisely my concern.
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 2:11
2
2
@user2364450 If you have time to get a new visa, that would be the safest thing, but I suspect that if you have a reasonable explanation for changing your itinerary after the visa was granted, you will be okay. It is certainly true that you are allowed to travel using your multiple entry visa for any purpose allowed under a short-stay visa, business, pleasure, or otherwise.
– phoog
Mar 25 '16 at 2:40
@user2364450 If you have time to get a new visa, that would be the safest thing, but I suspect that if you have a reasonable explanation for changing your itinerary after the visa was granted, you will be okay. It is certainly true that you are allowed to travel using your multiple entry visa for any purpose allowed under a short-stay visa, business, pleasure, or otherwise.
– phoog
Mar 25 '16 at 2:40
@phoog Not possible, as my flight's tomorrow!
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 13:32
@phoog Not possible, as my flight's tomorrow!
– Pastafarian
Mar 25 '16 at 13:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65624%2fusing-multiple-entry-turismo-schengen-visa-for-business%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If you are on a single entry visa, then you're not allowed back into Milan once you leave the country to Geneva. You need to have a multiple entry visa.
– Prashanth
Mar 24 '16 at 4:28
1
What does your visa state on the first line, "VALID FOR"?
– Michael Hampton
Mar 24 '16 at 4:48
@Prashanth I apologize for the confusion. I have edited my question. I have a multiple-entry Schengen visa. My main issue is the change in purpose of travel that the visa was originally issued for.
– Pastafarian
Mar 24 '16 at 4:51
5
Honestly, there is no “security situation in Europe” that justifies shortening trips to Italy.
– Relaxed
Mar 24 '16 at 7:00
2
@Prashanth A trip from Italy to Switzerland and back does not leave the Schengen area, so it can be done with a single entry visa.
– phoog
Mar 24 '16 at 15:02