In airport design, do international arrivals mix with domestic arrivals? [closed]
I am working on a concept for a small airport international arrivals terminal with separate VIP and general public lounge/gate. I want to know if I can allow domestic arrivals to mix with international arrivals without disturbing the VIP.
Does anyone know any rules and regulations governing this mixture?
air-travel airports international-travel airport-security
closed as off-topic by blackbird, Jan, Giorgio, Crazydre, chx Oct 4 '16 at 1:05
- This question does not appear to be about traveling within the scope defined in the help center.
|
show 1 more comment
I am working on a concept for a small airport international arrivals terminal with separate VIP and general public lounge/gate. I want to know if I can allow domestic arrivals to mix with international arrivals without disturbing the VIP.
Does anyone know any rules and regulations governing this mixture?
air-travel airports international-travel airport-security
closed as off-topic by blackbird, Jan, Giorgio, Crazydre, chx Oct 4 '16 at 1:05
- This question does not appear to be about traveling within the scope defined in the help center.
4
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's not about travel
– blackbird
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Hi and welcome to Travel Stack Exchange. Feel free to take a tour of the site. Your question has the potential of being too broad, but in most countries the system would be the same.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
1
@blackbird Of all the possible close reasons you could have chosen you chose that?
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Seeing as how international arrivals need to deal with immigration, I doubt the two can mix until both have claimed bags and exited inti the public lobby.
– user13044
Oct 4 '16 at 0:25
2
@Tom Depending on the country they can mix before the luggage. In Europe, they often do. Of course, passport control is before the luggage reclaim.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:27
|
show 1 more comment
I am working on a concept for a small airport international arrivals terminal with separate VIP and general public lounge/gate. I want to know if I can allow domestic arrivals to mix with international arrivals without disturbing the VIP.
Does anyone know any rules and regulations governing this mixture?
air-travel airports international-travel airport-security
I am working on a concept for a small airport international arrivals terminal with separate VIP and general public lounge/gate. I want to know if I can allow domestic arrivals to mix with international arrivals without disturbing the VIP.
Does anyone know any rules and regulations governing this mixture?
air-travel airports international-travel airport-security
air-travel airports international-travel airport-security
edited Feb 2 '17 at 20:24
pnuts
26.9k367164
26.9k367164
asked Oct 4 '16 at 0:10
Kounikui KarihindiKounikui Karihindi
111
111
closed as off-topic by blackbird, Jan, Giorgio, Crazydre, chx Oct 4 '16 at 1:05
- This question does not appear to be about traveling within the scope defined in the help center.
closed as off-topic by blackbird, Jan, Giorgio, Crazydre, chx Oct 4 '16 at 1:05
- This question does not appear to be about traveling within the scope defined in the help center.
4
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's not about travel
– blackbird
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Hi and welcome to Travel Stack Exchange. Feel free to take a tour of the site. Your question has the potential of being too broad, but in most countries the system would be the same.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
1
@blackbird Of all the possible close reasons you could have chosen you chose that?
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Seeing as how international arrivals need to deal with immigration, I doubt the two can mix until both have claimed bags and exited inti the public lobby.
– user13044
Oct 4 '16 at 0:25
2
@Tom Depending on the country they can mix before the luggage. In Europe, they often do. Of course, passport control is before the luggage reclaim.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:27
|
show 1 more comment
4
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's not about travel
– blackbird
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Hi and welcome to Travel Stack Exchange. Feel free to take a tour of the site. Your question has the potential of being too broad, but in most countries the system would be the same.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
1
@blackbird Of all the possible close reasons you could have chosen you chose that?
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Seeing as how international arrivals need to deal with immigration, I doubt the two can mix until both have claimed bags and exited inti the public lobby.
– user13044
Oct 4 '16 at 0:25
2
@Tom Depending on the country they can mix before the luggage. In Europe, they often do. Of course, passport control is before the luggage reclaim.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:27
4
4
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's not about travel
– blackbird
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's not about travel
– blackbird
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Hi and welcome to Travel Stack Exchange. Feel free to take a tour of the site. Your question has the potential of being too broad, but in most countries the system would be the same.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Hi and welcome to Travel Stack Exchange. Feel free to take a tour of the site. Your question has the potential of being too broad, but in most countries the system would be the same.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
1
1
@blackbird Of all the possible close reasons you could have chosen you chose that?
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
@blackbird Of all the possible close reasons you could have chosen you chose that?
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Seeing as how international arrivals need to deal with immigration, I doubt the two can mix until both have claimed bags and exited inti the public lobby.
– user13044
Oct 4 '16 at 0:25
Seeing as how international arrivals need to deal with immigration, I doubt the two can mix until both have claimed bags and exited inti the public lobby.
– user13044
Oct 4 '16 at 0:25
2
2
@Tom Depending on the country they can mix before the luggage. In Europe, they often do. Of course, passport control is before the luggage reclaim.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:27
@Tom Depending on the country they can mix before the luggage. In Europe, they often do. Of course, passport control is before the luggage reclaim.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:27
|
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
This really depends on which country you are in and what its laws are. There are three theoretical cases of which I’m the last two are much more common. Note that for the sake of this answer I’m subsuming entities like the Common Travel Area or the Schengen area under domestic since no passport controls happen there.
The country either does not check the passports of incoming international travellers or systematically checks passports of its domestic travellers. It either does not care for customs or requires domestic travellers to make a pro forma customs declaration.
In this case, either everybody or nobody must go through a passport/immigration control and thus both types of passengers can be mixed. They can also collect their luggage in the same areas and proceed onwards to the same customs declaration. Either domestic travellers are also required to make a declaration or nobody makes a declaration.
While some countries such as Russia require internal passports at least for internal rail travel (but probably also for internal air travel) this is a very unlikely case.
International travellers are subject to immigration/passport controls; domestic travellers are not. They proceed to the same luggage carousels and either both types or neither makes a customs declaration.
If the laws of the country require this setup, it is absolutely mandatory to separate international and domestic arrivals at least until behind the immigration gates. Whether the travellers then mix or not is a different question.
As far as I know, some European airports use this setup, with luggage carousels being behind the immigration control and everybody making a customs declaration upon exiting. The declaration is made by choosing either the green or red lane and there are large enough signs saying use green if you are from an EU country.
The country requires international travellers to subject themselves to both immigration and customs checks; from the way these checks are performed, it is mandatory to separate international and domestic arrivals until the former have made their customs declaration.
I would guess that this is the standard for most countries of the world. They first want to know who is coming in (do we need to bounce them or are they okay?) and then they want to know what is coming in (do we consider that item legal or do we want to levy some customs duties?). Subjecting domestic travellers to this zealous inspection would either not be well received by them or would be actively inhibited due to security reasons or to prevent customs circumvention.
When you are designing your airport, it is up the the country you are designing it in which of these applies; but my money is on number 3.
Note: This post is only focussing on the question on whether international and domestic arrivals can be mixed on their way from the jet bridges either to the outside via the luggage carousels or to connecting flights. An entirely different story and not covered is the question whether arrivals and departures can mix, and if so which types.
1
Not covered here is the model used in the US and Canada. These airports generally have a single secure area for mixed arrivals and departures, and a separate area for international arrivals, in which all inbound travelers must pass immigration and customs before exiting either to ground transportation or to the secure area.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:49
Most airports of the world separate arrivals and departures. It's not common outside the US and Canada for them to be mixed, but there are exceptions (like Heathrow).
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:52
No, you didn't, but it's something the OP needs to be aware of if he's really studying airport design. The comment was more for him than for you.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:55
@MichaelHampton Ah, okay, then I get it =)
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:56
(+1) "Some European airports" in point 2 should be "nearly all" I think. I can't even think of an exception right now (beside the fact that some countries have a third, blue, lane for arrivals from the EU).
– Relaxed
Oct 4 '16 at 9:59
|
show 2 more comments
In most countries, international arrivals requires a separate stream of passengers, segregated from everyone else in the airport. Passengers arriving from other countries must go through immigration and customs checks before they are allowed to come into contact with others, as "undesirable" passengers might otherwise sneak into the country or pass off prohibited items.
In the United States, US Customs and Border Protection publishes an exhaustive document called the "Airport Technical Design Standard" (I'm not able to find a current copy online) that details the physical requirements for handling inbound international passengers. Everything about the environment must be controlled to CBP's specifications, from the corridors to the access control systems to the security cameras. These rules extend to the gate area, who can access the plane and when, the movement of uncleared passengers and luggage, even the disposal of international garbage (some airports incinerate it on site to comply with CBP requirements). There are special procedures for where international arriving passengers are taken if the terminal must be evacuated, procedures for allowing specially cleared airport and airline staff access to this secure area, etc... Other countries concerned about border security have similar requirements. All of this is to say that countries spend a lot of time and resources thinking about the design of facilities that handle international passengers with security in mind. Any design where passengers mix or take unusual paths would violate the technical standards for the design of these secure areas.
In addition, some airports treat international arrivals (or a subset of international arrivals from some countries) as "unscreened" for security purposes and require that they must go through airport security before allowing them back into the terminal concourse. They may not require the same rescreening for domestic connecting passengers. For example, a passenger arriving at San Francisco from Frankfurt must go through all of US immigration, customs, and TSA security screening before they can board a connecting flight. If this "unscreened" passenger were allowed into contact with passengers from other flights, he could potentially pass off prohibited items before going through screening.
It is, of course, possible that a particular VIP might be escorted by airline staff or immigration officials through a special route or procedure. This would require the approval of the airport's border officials, as it would bypass the normal security measures for arriving international passengers.
add a comment |
International arrivals will have to go through immigration and customs, domestic arrivals do not. That makes mixing them difficult and not very practical especially if the airport needs to support international transit as well.
VIP handling is a different issue. Most airlines will provide some accommodation anywhere from extra (and hopefully shorter) lines for check-in, security, immigration & customs to driving you around the tarmac with a black limo and a personal host that walks you through all parts of the process with high priority privileges.
1
Or an immigration officer will come to the VIP in a private terminal or lounge.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:51
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This really depends on which country you are in and what its laws are. There are three theoretical cases of which I’m the last two are much more common. Note that for the sake of this answer I’m subsuming entities like the Common Travel Area or the Schengen area under domestic since no passport controls happen there.
The country either does not check the passports of incoming international travellers or systematically checks passports of its domestic travellers. It either does not care for customs or requires domestic travellers to make a pro forma customs declaration.
In this case, either everybody or nobody must go through a passport/immigration control and thus both types of passengers can be mixed. They can also collect their luggage in the same areas and proceed onwards to the same customs declaration. Either domestic travellers are also required to make a declaration or nobody makes a declaration.
While some countries such as Russia require internal passports at least for internal rail travel (but probably also for internal air travel) this is a very unlikely case.
International travellers are subject to immigration/passport controls; domestic travellers are not. They proceed to the same luggage carousels and either both types or neither makes a customs declaration.
If the laws of the country require this setup, it is absolutely mandatory to separate international and domestic arrivals at least until behind the immigration gates. Whether the travellers then mix or not is a different question.
As far as I know, some European airports use this setup, with luggage carousels being behind the immigration control and everybody making a customs declaration upon exiting. The declaration is made by choosing either the green or red lane and there are large enough signs saying use green if you are from an EU country.
The country requires international travellers to subject themselves to both immigration and customs checks; from the way these checks are performed, it is mandatory to separate international and domestic arrivals until the former have made their customs declaration.
I would guess that this is the standard for most countries of the world. They first want to know who is coming in (do we need to bounce them or are they okay?) and then they want to know what is coming in (do we consider that item legal or do we want to levy some customs duties?). Subjecting domestic travellers to this zealous inspection would either not be well received by them or would be actively inhibited due to security reasons or to prevent customs circumvention.
When you are designing your airport, it is up the the country you are designing it in which of these applies; but my money is on number 3.
Note: This post is only focussing on the question on whether international and domestic arrivals can be mixed on their way from the jet bridges either to the outside via the luggage carousels or to connecting flights. An entirely different story and not covered is the question whether arrivals and departures can mix, and if so which types.
1
Not covered here is the model used in the US and Canada. These airports generally have a single secure area for mixed arrivals and departures, and a separate area for international arrivals, in which all inbound travelers must pass immigration and customs before exiting either to ground transportation or to the secure area.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:49
Most airports of the world separate arrivals and departures. It's not common outside the US and Canada for them to be mixed, but there are exceptions (like Heathrow).
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:52
No, you didn't, but it's something the OP needs to be aware of if he's really studying airport design. The comment was more for him than for you.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:55
@MichaelHampton Ah, okay, then I get it =)
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:56
(+1) "Some European airports" in point 2 should be "nearly all" I think. I can't even think of an exception right now (beside the fact that some countries have a third, blue, lane for arrivals from the EU).
– Relaxed
Oct 4 '16 at 9:59
|
show 2 more comments
This really depends on which country you are in and what its laws are. There are three theoretical cases of which I’m the last two are much more common. Note that for the sake of this answer I’m subsuming entities like the Common Travel Area or the Schengen area under domestic since no passport controls happen there.
The country either does not check the passports of incoming international travellers or systematically checks passports of its domestic travellers. It either does not care for customs or requires domestic travellers to make a pro forma customs declaration.
In this case, either everybody or nobody must go through a passport/immigration control and thus both types of passengers can be mixed. They can also collect their luggage in the same areas and proceed onwards to the same customs declaration. Either domestic travellers are also required to make a declaration or nobody makes a declaration.
While some countries such as Russia require internal passports at least for internal rail travel (but probably also for internal air travel) this is a very unlikely case.
International travellers are subject to immigration/passport controls; domestic travellers are not. They proceed to the same luggage carousels and either both types or neither makes a customs declaration.
If the laws of the country require this setup, it is absolutely mandatory to separate international and domestic arrivals at least until behind the immigration gates. Whether the travellers then mix or not is a different question.
As far as I know, some European airports use this setup, with luggage carousels being behind the immigration control and everybody making a customs declaration upon exiting. The declaration is made by choosing either the green or red lane and there are large enough signs saying use green if you are from an EU country.
The country requires international travellers to subject themselves to both immigration and customs checks; from the way these checks are performed, it is mandatory to separate international and domestic arrivals until the former have made their customs declaration.
I would guess that this is the standard for most countries of the world. They first want to know who is coming in (do we need to bounce them or are they okay?) and then they want to know what is coming in (do we consider that item legal or do we want to levy some customs duties?). Subjecting domestic travellers to this zealous inspection would either not be well received by them or would be actively inhibited due to security reasons or to prevent customs circumvention.
When you are designing your airport, it is up the the country you are designing it in which of these applies; but my money is on number 3.
Note: This post is only focussing on the question on whether international and domestic arrivals can be mixed on their way from the jet bridges either to the outside via the luggage carousels or to connecting flights. An entirely different story and not covered is the question whether arrivals and departures can mix, and if so which types.
1
Not covered here is the model used in the US and Canada. These airports generally have a single secure area for mixed arrivals and departures, and a separate area for international arrivals, in which all inbound travelers must pass immigration and customs before exiting either to ground transportation or to the secure area.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:49
Most airports of the world separate arrivals and departures. It's not common outside the US and Canada for them to be mixed, but there are exceptions (like Heathrow).
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:52
No, you didn't, but it's something the OP needs to be aware of if he's really studying airport design. The comment was more for him than for you.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:55
@MichaelHampton Ah, okay, then I get it =)
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:56
(+1) "Some European airports" in point 2 should be "nearly all" I think. I can't even think of an exception right now (beside the fact that some countries have a third, blue, lane for arrivals from the EU).
– Relaxed
Oct 4 '16 at 9:59
|
show 2 more comments
This really depends on which country you are in and what its laws are. There are three theoretical cases of which I’m the last two are much more common. Note that for the sake of this answer I’m subsuming entities like the Common Travel Area or the Schengen area under domestic since no passport controls happen there.
The country either does not check the passports of incoming international travellers or systematically checks passports of its domestic travellers. It either does not care for customs or requires domestic travellers to make a pro forma customs declaration.
In this case, either everybody or nobody must go through a passport/immigration control and thus both types of passengers can be mixed. They can also collect their luggage in the same areas and proceed onwards to the same customs declaration. Either domestic travellers are also required to make a declaration or nobody makes a declaration.
While some countries such as Russia require internal passports at least for internal rail travel (but probably also for internal air travel) this is a very unlikely case.
International travellers are subject to immigration/passport controls; domestic travellers are not. They proceed to the same luggage carousels and either both types or neither makes a customs declaration.
If the laws of the country require this setup, it is absolutely mandatory to separate international and domestic arrivals at least until behind the immigration gates. Whether the travellers then mix or not is a different question.
As far as I know, some European airports use this setup, with luggage carousels being behind the immigration control and everybody making a customs declaration upon exiting. The declaration is made by choosing either the green or red lane and there are large enough signs saying use green if you are from an EU country.
The country requires international travellers to subject themselves to both immigration and customs checks; from the way these checks are performed, it is mandatory to separate international and domestic arrivals until the former have made their customs declaration.
I would guess that this is the standard for most countries of the world. They first want to know who is coming in (do we need to bounce them or are they okay?) and then they want to know what is coming in (do we consider that item legal or do we want to levy some customs duties?). Subjecting domestic travellers to this zealous inspection would either not be well received by them or would be actively inhibited due to security reasons or to prevent customs circumvention.
When you are designing your airport, it is up the the country you are designing it in which of these applies; but my money is on number 3.
Note: This post is only focussing on the question on whether international and domestic arrivals can be mixed on their way from the jet bridges either to the outside via the luggage carousels or to connecting flights. An entirely different story and not covered is the question whether arrivals and departures can mix, and if so which types.
This really depends on which country you are in and what its laws are. There are three theoretical cases of which I’m the last two are much more common. Note that for the sake of this answer I’m subsuming entities like the Common Travel Area or the Schengen area under domestic since no passport controls happen there.
The country either does not check the passports of incoming international travellers or systematically checks passports of its domestic travellers. It either does not care for customs or requires domestic travellers to make a pro forma customs declaration.
In this case, either everybody or nobody must go through a passport/immigration control and thus both types of passengers can be mixed. They can also collect their luggage in the same areas and proceed onwards to the same customs declaration. Either domestic travellers are also required to make a declaration or nobody makes a declaration.
While some countries such as Russia require internal passports at least for internal rail travel (but probably also for internal air travel) this is a very unlikely case.
International travellers are subject to immigration/passport controls; domestic travellers are not. They proceed to the same luggage carousels and either both types or neither makes a customs declaration.
If the laws of the country require this setup, it is absolutely mandatory to separate international and domestic arrivals at least until behind the immigration gates. Whether the travellers then mix or not is a different question.
As far as I know, some European airports use this setup, with luggage carousels being behind the immigration control and everybody making a customs declaration upon exiting. The declaration is made by choosing either the green or red lane and there are large enough signs saying use green if you are from an EU country.
The country requires international travellers to subject themselves to both immigration and customs checks; from the way these checks are performed, it is mandatory to separate international and domestic arrivals until the former have made their customs declaration.
I would guess that this is the standard for most countries of the world. They first want to know who is coming in (do we need to bounce them or are they okay?) and then they want to know what is coming in (do we consider that item legal or do we want to levy some customs duties?). Subjecting domestic travellers to this zealous inspection would either not be well received by them or would be actively inhibited due to security reasons or to prevent customs circumvention.
When you are designing your airport, it is up the the country you are designing it in which of these applies; but my money is on number 3.
Note: This post is only focussing on the question on whether international and domestic arrivals can be mixed on their way from the jet bridges either to the outside via the luggage carousels or to connecting flights. An entirely different story and not covered is the question whether arrivals and departures can mix, and if so which types.
edited Oct 4 '16 at 0:58
answered Oct 4 '16 at 0:38
JanJan
10.7k33767
10.7k33767
1
Not covered here is the model used in the US and Canada. These airports generally have a single secure area for mixed arrivals and departures, and a separate area for international arrivals, in which all inbound travelers must pass immigration and customs before exiting either to ground transportation or to the secure area.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:49
Most airports of the world separate arrivals and departures. It's not common outside the US and Canada for them to be mixed, but there are exceptions (like Heathrow).
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:52
No, you didn't, but it's something the OP needs to be aware of if he's really studying airport design. The comment was more for him than for you.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:55
@MichaelHampton Ah, okay, then I get it =)
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:56
(+1) "Some European airports" in point 2 should be "nearly all" I think. I can't even think of an exception right now (beside the fact that some countries have a third, blue, lane for arrivals from the EU).
– Relaxed
Oct 4 '16 at 9:59
|
show 2 more comments
1
Not covered here is the model used in the US and Canada. These airports generally have a single secure area for mixed arrivals and departures, and a separate area for international arrivals, in which all inbound travelers must pass immigration and customs before exiting either to ground transportation or to the secure area.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:49
Most airports of the world separate arrivals and departures. It's not common outside the US and Canada for them to be mixed, but there are exceptions (like Heathrow).
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:52
No, you didn't, but it's something the OP needs to be aware of if he's really studying airport design. The comment was more for him than for you.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:55
@MichaelHampton Ah, okay, then I get it =)
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:56
(+1) "Some European airports" in point 2 should be "nearly all" I think. I can't even think of an exception right now (beside the fact that some countries have a third, blue, lane for arrivals from the EU).
– Relaxed
Oct 4 '16 at 9:59
1
1
Not covered here is the model used in the US and Canada. These airports generally have a single secure area for mixed arrivals and departures, and a separate area for international arrivals, in which all inbound travelers must pass immigration and customs before exiting either to ground transportation or to the secure area.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:49
Not covered here is the model used in the US and Canada. These airports generally have a single secure area for mixed arrivals and departures, and a separate area for international arrivals, in which all inbound travelers must pass immigration and customs before exiting either to ground transportation or to the secure area.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:49
Most airports of the world separate arrivals and departures. It's not common outside the US and Canada for them to be mixed, but there are exceptions (like Heathrow).
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:52
Most airports of the world separate arrivals and departures. It's not common outside the US and Canada for them to be mixed, but there are exceptions (like Heathrow).
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:52
No, you didn't, but it's something the OP needs to be aware of if he's really studying airport design. The comment was more for him than for you.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:55
No, you didn't, but it's something the OP needs to be aware of if he's really studying airport design. The comment was more for him than for you.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:55
@MichaelHampton Ah, okay, then I get it =)
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:56
@MichaelHampton Ah, okay, then I get it =)
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:56
(+1) "Some European airports" in point 2 should be "nearly all" I think. I can't even think of an exception right now (beside the fact that some countries have a third, blue, lane for arrivals from the EU).
– Relaxed
Oct 4 '16 at 9:59
(+1) "Some European airports" in point 2 should be "nearly all" I think. I can't even think of an exception right now (beside the fact that some countries have a third, blue, lane for arrivals from the EU).
– Relaxed
Oct 4 '16 at 9:59
|
show 2 more comments
In most countries, international arrivals requires a separate stream of passengers, segregated from everyone else in the airport. Passengers arriving from other countries must go through immigration and customs checks before they are allowed to come into contact with others, as "undesirable" passengers might otherwise sneak into the country or pass off prohibited items.
In the United States, US Customs and Border Protection publishes an exhaustive document called the "Airport Technical Design Standard" (I'm not able to find a current copy online) that details the physical requirements for handling inbound international passengers. Everything about the environment must be controlled to CBP's specifications, from the corridors to the access control systems to the security cameras. These rules extend to the gate area, who can access the plane and when, the movement of uncleared passengers and luggage, even the disposal of international garbage (some airports incinerate it on site to comply with CBP requirements). There are special procedures for where international arriving passengers are taken if the terminal must be evacuated, procedures for allowing specially cleared airport and airline staff access to this secure area, etc... Other countries concerned about border security have similar requirements. All of this is to say that countries spend a lot of time and resources thinking about the design of facilities that handle international passengers with security in mind. Any design where passengers mix or take unusual paths would violate the technical standards for the design of these secure areas.
In addition, some airports treat international arrivals (or a subset of international arrivals from some countries) as "unscreened" for security purposes and require that they must go through airport security before allowing them back into the terminal concourse. They may not require the same rescreening for domestic connecting passengers. For example, a passenger arriving at San Francisco from Frankfurt must go through all of US immigration, customs, and TSA security screening before they can board a connecting flight. If this "unscreened" passenger were allowed into contact with passengers from other flights, he could potentially pass off prohibited items before going through screening.
It is, of course, possible that a particular VIP might be escorted by airline staff or immigration officials through a special route or procedure. This would require the approval of the airport's border officials, as it would bypass the normal security measures for arriving international passengers.
add a comment |
In most countries, international arrivals requires a separate stream of passengers, segregated from everyone else in the airport. Passengers arriving from other countries must go through immigration and customs checks before they are allowed to come into contact with others, as "undesirable" passengers might otherwise sneak into the country or pass off prohibited items.
In the United States, US Customs and Border Protection publishes an exhaustive document called the "Airport Technical Design Standard" (I'm not able to find a current copy online) that details the physical requirements for handling inbound international passengers. Everything about the environment must be controlled to CBP's specifications, from the corridors to the access control systems to the security cameras. These rules extend to the gate area, who can access the plane and when, the movement of uncleared passengers and luggage, even the disposal of international garbage (some airports incinerate it on site to comply with CBP requirements). There are special procedures for where international arriving passengers are taken if the terminal must be evacuated, procedures for allowing specially cleared airport and airline staff access to this secure area, etc... Other countries concerned about border security have similar requirements. All of this is to say that countries spend a lot of time and resources thinking about the design of facilities that handle international passengers with security in mind. Any design where passengers mix or take unusual paths would violate the technical standards for the design of these secure areas.
In addition, some airports treat international arrivals (or a subset of international arrivals from some countries) as "unscreened" for security purposes and require that they must go through airport security before allowing them back into the terminal concourse. They may not require the same rescreening for domestic connecting passengers. For example, a passenger arriving at San Francisco from Frankfurt must go through all of US immigration, customs, and TSA security screening before they can board a connecting flight. If this "unscreened" passenger were allowed into contact with passengers from other flights, he could potentially pass off prohibited items before going through screening.
It is, of course, possible that a particular VIP might be escorted by airline staff or immigration officials through a special route or procedure. This would require the approval of the airport's border officials, as it would bypass the normal security measures for arriving international passengers.
add a comment |
In most countries, international arrivals requires a separate stream of passengers, segregated from everyone else in the airport. Passengers arriving from other countries must go through immigration and customs checks before they are allowed to come into contact with others, as "undesirable" passengers might otherwise sneak into the country or pass off prohibited items.
In the United States, US Customs and Border Protection publishes an exhaustive document called the "Airport Technical Design Standard" (I'm not able to find a current copy online) that details the physical requirements for handling inbound international passengers. Everything about the environment must be controlled to CBP's specifications, from the corridors to the access control systems to the security cameras. These rules extend to the gate area, who can access the plane and when, the movement of uncleared passengers and luggage, even the disposal of international garbage (some airports incinerate it on site to comply with CBP requirements). There are special procedures for where international arriving passengers are taken if the terminal must be evacuated, procedures for allowing specially cleared airport and airline staff access to this secure area, etc... Other countries concerned about border security have similar requirements. All of this is to say that countries spend a lot of time and resources thinking about the design of facilities that handle international passengers with security in mind. Any design where passengers mix or take unusual paths would violate the technical standards for the design of these secure areas.
In addition, some airports treat international arrivals (or a subset of international arrivals from some countries) as "unscreened" for security purposes and require that they must go through airport security before allowing them back into the terminal concourse. They may not require the same rescreening for domestic connecting passengers. For example, a passenger arriving at San Francisco from Frankfurt must go through all of US immigration, customs, and TSA security screening before they can board a connecting flight. If this "unscreened" passenger were allowed into contact with passengers from other flights, he could potentially pass off prohibited items before going through screening.
It is, of course, possible that a particular VIP might be escorted by airline staff or immigration officials through a special route or procedure. This would require the approval of the airport's border officials, as it would bypass the normal security measures for arriving international passengers.
In most countries, international arrivals requires a separate stream of passengers, segregated from everyone else in the airport. Passengers arriving from other countries must go through immigration and customs checks before they are allowed to come into contact with others, as "undesirable" passengers might otherwise sneak into the country or pass off prohibited items.
In the United States, US Customs and Border Protection publishes an exhaustive document called the "Airport Technical Design Standard" (I'm not able to find a current copy online) that details the physical requirements for handling inbound international passengers. Everything about the environment must be controlled to CBP's specifications, from the corridors to the access control systems to the security cameras. These rules extend to the gate area, who can access the plane and when, the movement of uncleared passengers and luggage, even the disposal of international garbage (some airports incinerate it on site to comply with CBP requirements). There are special procedures for where international arriving passengers are taken if the terminal must be evacuated, procedures for allowing specially cleared airport and airline staff access to this secure area, etc... Other countries concerned about border security have similar requirements. All of this is to say that countries spend a lot of time and resources thinking about the design of facilities that handle international passengers with security in mind. Any design where passengers mix or take unusual paths would violate the technical standards for the design of these secure areas.
In addition, some airports treat international arrivals (or a subset of international arrivals from some countries) as "unscreened" for security purposes and require that they must go through airport security before allowing them back into the terminal concourse. They may not require the same rescreening for domestic connecting passengers. For example, a passenger arriving at San Francisco from Frankfurt must go through all of US immigration, customs, and TSA security screening before they can board a connecting flight. If this "unscreened" passenger were allowed into contact with passengers from other flights, he could potentially pass off prohibited items before going through screening.
It is, of course, possible that a particular VIP might be escorted by airline staff or immigration officials through a special route or procedure. This would require the approval of the airport's border officials, as it would bypass the normal security measures for arriving international passengers.
answered Oct 4 '16 at 1:05
Zach LiptonZach Lipton
60.2k10184243
60.2k10184243
add a comment |
add a comment |
International arrivals will have to go through immigration and customs, domestic arrivals do not. That makes mixing them difficult and not very practical especially if the airport needs to support international transit as well.
VIP handling is a different issue. Most airlines will provide some accommodation anywhere from extra (and hopefully shorter) lines for check-in, security, immigration & customs to driving you around the tarmac with a black limo and a personal host that walks you through all parts of the process with high priority privileges.
1
Or an immigration officer will come to the VIP in a private terminal or lounge.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:51
add a comment |
International arrivals will have to go through immigration and customs, domestic arrivals do not. That makes mixing them difficult and not very practical especially if the airport needs to support international transit as well.
VIP handling is a different issue. Most airlines will provide some accommodation anywhere from extra (and hopefully shorter) lines for check-in, security, immigration & customs to driving you around the tarmac with a black limo and a personal host that walks you through all parts of the process with high priority privileges.
1
Or an immigration officer will come to the VIP in a private terminal or lounge.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:51
add a comment |
International arrivals will have to go through immigration and customs, domestic arrivals do not. That makes mixing them difficult and not very practical especially if the airport needs to support international transit as well.
VIP handling is a different issue. Most airlines will provide some accommodation anywhere from extra (and hopefully shorter) lines for check-in, security, immigration & customs to driving you around the tarmac with a black limo and a personal host that walks you through all parts of the process with high priority privileges.
International arrivals will have to go through immigration and customs, domestic arrivals do not. That makes mixing them difficult and not very practical especially if the airport needs to support international transit as well.
VIP handling is a different issue. Most airlines will provide some accommodation anywhere from extra (and hopefully shorter) lines for check-in, security, immigration & customs to driving you around the tarmac with a black limo and a personal host that walks you through all parts of the process with high priority privileges.
answered Oct 4 '16 at 0:49
HilmarHilmar
20.9k13368
20.9k13368
1
Or an immigration officer will come to the VIP in a private terminal or lounge.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:51
add a comment |
1
Or an immigration officer will come to the VIP in a private terminal or lounge.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:51
1
1
Or an immigration officer will come to the VIP in a private terminal or lounge.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:51
Or an immigration officer will come to the VIP in a private terminal or lounge.
– Michael Hampton
Oct 4 '16 at 0:51
add a comment |
4
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's not about travel
– blackbird
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Hi and welcome to Travel Stack Exchange. Feel free to take a tour of the site. Your question has the potential of being too broad, but in most countries the system would be the same.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
1
@blackbird Of all the possible close reasons you could have chosen you chose that?
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:24
Seeing as how international arrivals need to deal with immigration, I doubt the two can mix until both have claimed bags and exited inti the public lobby.
– user13044
Oct 4 '16 at 0:25
2
@Tom Depending on the country they can mix before the luggage. In Europe, they often do. Of course, passport control is before the luggage reclaim.
– Jan
Oct 4 '16 at 0:27