Search/Filter nested Array Javascript/Lodash










1















For my React.js project I would like to create a search-filter of a nested Array. Users will search with an input-field.



 var dataExample = [

type: "human", details: [
id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair",
id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond"
]
,


type: "animal", details: [
id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute",
id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful"
]

];


In my search-input-field I want to look for "name" or something in "description". The data structure of the array should remain the same.



The output when I'm searching for "friendly" or "Peter" should be:



[

type: "human", details: [
id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair"
]

];


Now I tried something like this:



 let myfilter = dataExample.filter((data) => 
data.details.filter((items) =>
return (items.type.indexOf("human") !== -1 )
)


Unfortunately, this is not how it works. Can anybody help me? Lodash would be no problem, too. Thank you so much.










share|improve this question


























    1















    For my React.js project I would like to create a search-filter of a nested Array. Users will search with an input-field.



     var dataExample = [

    type: "human", details: [
    id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair",
    id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond"
    ]
    ,


    type: "animal", details: [
    id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute",
    id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful"
    ]

    ];


    In my search-input-field I want to look for "name" or something in "description". The data structure of the array should remain the same.



    The output when I'm searching for "friendly" or "Peter" should be:



    [

    type: "human", details: [
    id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair"
    ]

    ];


    Now I tried something like this:



     let myfilter = dataExample.filter((data) => 
    data.details.filter((items) =>
    return (items.type.indexOf("human") !== -1 )
    )


    Unfortunately, this is not how it works. Can anybody help me? Lodash would be no problem, too. Thank you so much.










    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1








      For my React.js project I would like to create a search-filter of a nested Array. Users will search with an input-field.



       var dataExample = [

      type: "human", details: [
      id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair",
      id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond"
      ]
      ,


      type: "animal", details: [
      id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute",
      id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful"
      ]

      ];


      In my search-input-field I want to look for "name" or something in "description". The data structure of the array should remain the same.



      The output when I'm searching for "friendly" or "Peter" should be:



      [

      type: "human", details: [
      id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair"
      ]

      ];


      Now I tried something like this:



       let myfilter = dataExample.filter((data) => 
      data.details.filter((items) =>
      return (items.type.indexOf("human") !== -1 )
      )


      Unfortunately, this is not how it works. Can anybody help me? Lodash would be no problem, too. Thank you so much.










      share|improve this question














      For my React.js project I would like to create a search-filter of a nested Array. Users will search with an input-field.



       var dataExample = [

      type: "human", details: [
      id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair",
      id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond"
      ]
      ,


      type: "animal", details: [
      id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute",
      id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful"
      ]

      ];


      In my search-input-field I want to look for "name" or something in "description". The data structure of the array should remain the same.



      The output when I'm searching for "friendly" or "Peter" should be:



      [

      type: "human", details: [
      id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair"
      ]

      ];


      Now I tried something like this:



       let myfilter = dataExample.filter((data) => 
      data.details.filter((items) =>
      return (items.type.indexOf("human") !== -1 )
      )


      Unfortunately, this is not how it works. Can anybody help me? Lodash would be no problem, too. Thank you so much.







      javascript arrays search filter nested






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 11 '18 at 10:58









      HP_webHP_web

      82




      82






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          You can use array#reduce with array#filter and to check for your word you can use string#incldues.






          const dataExample = [ type: "human", details: [ id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair", id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond" ] , type: "animal",details: [ id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute", id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful" ] ],
          term = 'Peter',
          result = dataExample.reduce((r, type,details) => ,);
          console.log(result);








          share|improve this answer

























          • Thank you for your answer. Everything works perfect! Learned something new again.

            – HP_web
            Nov 11 '18 at 13:05











          • There seems to be a problem with your code after all. If the search is empty (term = ' '), an array at "Details" with only length 1 is displayed. It should be an array with 2 objects. Do you know what the problem is?

            – HP_web
            Nov 12 '18 at 9:13











          • What should be the output when term is empty?

            – Hassan Imam
            Nov 13 '18 at 6:26











          • The output of an empty String in "includes" should be the same array as dataExample. With your code the output are the two objects ("human" and "animal") and only one object in the "details"-array (instead of two objects).

            – HP_web
            Nov 14 '18 at 9:09











          • Check now updated the solution.

            – Hassan Imam
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:39


















          0














          Here are some examples without lodash.



           var dataAll = [

          type: "human",
          details: [
          id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair",
          id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond"
          ]
          ,

          type: "animal",
          details: [
          id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute",
          id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful"
          ]

          ];

          var entryTypeFilter = data => data.type.indexOf("hum") !== -1;
          var entryDetailDescFilter = data => data.description.indexOf("friend") !== -1;
          var entryDetailsMapper = data =>
          return
          type: data.type,
          details: data.details.filter(entryDetailDescFilter)
          ;
          ;
          var entryNoDetailsFilter = data => data.details && data.details.length !== 0;

          var dataFilteredByType = dataAll.filter(entryTypeFilter);
          var dataFilteredByDesc = dataAll.map(entryDetailsMapper);
          var dataFilteredByTypeAndDesc = dataAll.filter(entryTypeFilter).map(entryDetailsMapper);
          var dataFilteredByDescTrimmingEmptyDetailEntries = dataAll.map(entryDetailsMapper).filter(entryNoDetailsFilter);


          • In modern javascript you might want to search on how to use the ... keyword for the mapping callback functions.





          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53248036%2fsearch-filter-nested-array-javascript-lodash%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            You can use array#reduce with array#filter and to check for your word you can use string#incldues.






            const dataExample = [ type: "human", details: [ id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair", id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond" ] , type: "animal",details: [ id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute", id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful" ] ],
            term = 'Peter',
            result = dataExample.reduce((r, type,details) => ,);
            console.log(result);








            share|improve this answer

























            • Thank you for your answer. Everything works perfect! Learned something new again.

              – HP_web
              Nov 11 '18 at 13:05











            • There seems to be a problem with your code after all. If the search is empty (term = ' '), an array at "Details" with only length 1 is displayed. It should be an array with 2 objects. Do you know what the problem is?

              – HP_web
              Nov 12 '18 at 9:13











            • What should be the output when term is empty?

              – Hassan Imam
              Nov 13 '18 at 6:26











            • The output of an empty String in "includes" should be the same array as dataExample. With your code the output are the two objects ("human" and "animal") and only one object in the "details"-array (instead of two objects).

              – HP_web
              Nov 14 '18 at 9:09











            • Check now updated the solution.

              – Hassan Imam
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:39















            0














            You can use array#reduce with array#filter and to check for your word you can use string#incldues.






            const dataExample = [ type: "human", details: [ id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair", id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond" ] , type: "animal",details: [ id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute", id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful" ] ],
            term = 'Peter',
            result = dataExample.reduce((r, type,details) => ,);
            console.log(result);








            share|improve this answer

























            • Thank you for your answer. Everything works perfect! Learned something new again.

              – HP_web
              Nov 11 '18 at 13:05











            • There seems to be a problem with your code after all. If the search is empty (term = ' '), an array at "Details" with only length 1 is displayed. It should be an array with 2 objects. Do you know what the problem is?

              – HP_web
              Nov 12 '18 at 9:13











            • What should be the output when term is empty?

              – Hassan Imam
              Nov 13 '18 at 6:26











            • The output of an empty String in "includes" should be the same array as dataExample. With your code the output are the two objects ("human" and "animal") and only one object in the "details"-array (instead of two objects).

              – HP_web
              Nov 14 '18 at 9:09











            • Check now updated the solution.

              – Hassan Imam
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:39













            0












            0








            0







            You can use array#reduce with array#filter and to check for your word you can use string#incldues.






            const dataExample = [ type: "human", details: [ id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair", id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond" ] , type: "animal",details: [ id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute", id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful" ] ],
            term = 'Peter',
            result = dataExample.reduce((r, type,details) => ,);
            console.log(result);








            share|improve this answer















            You can use array#reduce with array#filter and to check for your word you can use string#incldues.






            const dataExample = [ type: "human", details: [ id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair", id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond" ] , type: "animal",details: [ id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute", id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful" ] ],
            term = 'Peter',
            result = dataExample.reduce((r, type,details) => ,);
            console.log(result);








            const dataExample = [ type: "human", details: [ id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair", id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond" ] , type: "animal",details: [ id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute", id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful" ] ],
            term = 'Peter',
            result = dataExample.reduce((r, type,details) => ,);
            console.log(result);





            const dataExample = [ type: "human", details: [ id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair", id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond" ] , type: "animal",details: [ id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute", id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful" ] ],
            term = 'Peter',
            result = dataExample.reduce((r, type,details) => ,);
            console.log(result);






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 14 '18 at 11:38

























            answered Nov 11 '18 at 12:24









            Hassan ImamHassan Imam

            11.7k31330




            11.7k31330












            • Thank you for your answer. Everything works perfect! Learned something new again.

              – HP_web
              Nov 11 '18 at 13:05











            • There seems to be a problem with your code after all. If the search is empty (term = ' '), an array at "Details" with only length 1 is displayed. It should be an array with 2 objects. Do you know what the problem is?

              – HP_web
              Nov 12 '18 at 9:13











            • What should be the output when term is empty?

              – Hassan Imam
              Nov 13 '18 at 6:26











            • The output of an empty String in "includes" should be the same array as dataExample. With your code the output are the two objects ("human" and "animal") and only one object in the "details"-array (instead of two objects).

              – HP_web
              Nov 14 '18 at 9:09











            • Check now updated the solution.

              – Hassan Imam
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:39

















            • Thank you for your answer. Everything works perfect! Learned something new again.

              – HP_web
              Nov 11 '18 at 13:05











            • There seems to be a problem with your code after all. If the search is empty (term = ' '), an array at "Details" with only length 1 is displayed. It should be an array with 2 objects. Do you know what the problem is?

              – HP_web
              Nov 12 '18 at 9:13











            • What should be the output when term is empty?

              – Hassan Imam
              Nov 13 '18 at 6:26











            • The output of an empty String in "includes" should be the same array as dataExample. With your code the output are the two objects ("human" and "animal") and only one object in the "details"-array (instead of two objects).

              – HP_web
              Nov 14 '18 at 9:09











            • Check now updated the solution.

              – Hassan Imam
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:39
















            Thank you for your answer. Everything works perfect! Learned something new again.

            – HP_web
            Nov 11 '18 at 13:05





            Thank you for your answer. Everything works perfect! Learned something new again.

            – HP_web
            Nov 11 '18 at 13:05













            There seems to be a problem with your code after all. If the search is empty (term = ' '), an array at "Details" with only length 1 is displayed. It should be an array with 2 objects. Do you know what the problem is?

            – HP_web
            Nov 12 '18 at 9:13





            There seems to be a problem with your code after all. If the search is empty (term = ' '), an array at "Details" with only length 1 is displayed. It should be an array with 2 objects. Do you know what the problem is?

            – HP_web
            Nov 12 '18 at 9:13













            What should be the output when term is empty?

            – Hassan Imam
            Nov 13 '18 at 6:26





            What should be the output when term is empty?

            – Hassan Imam
            Nov 13 '18 at 6:26













            The output of an empty String in "includes" should be the same array as dataExample. With your code the output are the two objects ("human" and "animal") and only one object in the "details"-array (instead of two objects).

            – HP_web
            Nov 14 '18 at 9:09





            The output of an empty String in "includes" should be the same array as dataExample. With your code the output are the two objects ("human" and "animal") and only one object in the "details"-array (instead of two objects).

            – HP_web
            Nov 14 '18 at 9:09













            Check now updated the solution.

            – Hassan Imam
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:39





            Check now updated the solution.

            – Hassan Imam
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:39













            0














            Here are some examples without lodash.



             var dataAll = [

            type: "human",
            details: [
            id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair",
            id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond"
            ]
            ,

            type: "animal",
            details: [
            id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute",
            id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful"
            ]

            ];

            var entryTypeFilter = data => data.type.indexOf("hum") !== -1;
            var entryDetailDescFilter = data => data.description.indexOf("friend") !== -1;
            var entryDetailsMapper = data =>
            return
            type: data.type,
            details: data.details.filter(entryDetailDescFilter)
            ;
            ;
            var entryNoDetailsFilter = data => data.details && data.details.length !== 0;

            var dataFilteredByType = dataAll.filter(entryTypeFilter);
            var dataFilteredByDesc = dataAll.map(entryDetailsMapper);
            var dataFilteredByTypeAndDesc = dataAll.filter(entryTypeFilter).map(entryDetailsMapper);
            var dataFilteredByDescTrimmingEmptyDetailEntries = dataAll.map(entryDetailsMapper).filter(entryNoDetailsFilter);


            • In modern javascript you might want to search on how to use the ... keyword for the mapping callback functions.





            share|improve this answer





























              0














              Here are some examples without lodash.



               var dataAll = [

              type: "human",
              details: [
              id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair",
              id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond"
              ]
              ,

              type: "animal",
              details: [
              id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute",
              id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful"
              ]

              ];

              var entryTypeFilter = data => data.type.indexOf("hum") !== -1;
              var entryDetailDescFilter = data => data.description.indexOf("friend") !== -1;
              var entryDetailsMapper = data =>
              return
              type: data.type,
              details: data.details.filter(entryDetailDescFilter)
              ;
              ;
              var entryNoDetailsFilter = data => data.details && data.details.length !== 0;

              var dataFilteredByType = dataAll.filter(entryTypeFilter);
              var dataFilteredByDesc = dataAll.map(entryDetailsMapper);
              var dataFilteredByTypeAndDesc = dataAll.filter(entryTypeFilter).map(entryDetailsMapper);
              var dataFilteredByDescTrimmingEmptyDetailEntries = dataAll.map(entryDetailsMapper).filter(entryNoDetailsFilter);


              • In modern javascript you might want to search on how to use the ... keyword for the mapping callback functions.





              share|improve this answer



























                0












                0








                0







                Here are some examples without lodash.



                 var dataAll = [

                type: "human",
                details: [
                id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair",
                id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond"
                ]
                ,

                type: "animal",
                details: [
                id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute",
                id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful"
                ]

                ];

                var entryTypeFilter = data => data.type.indexOf("hum") !== -1;
                var entryDetailDescFilter = data => data.description.indexOf("friend") !== -1;
                var entryDetailsMapper = data =>
                return
                type: data.type,
                details: data.details.filter(entryDetailDescFilter)
                ;
                ;
                var entryNoDetailsFilter = data => data.details && data.details.length !== 0;

                var dataFilteredByType = dataAll.filter(entryTypeFilter);
                var dataFilteredByDesc = dataAll.map(entryDetailsMapper);
                var dataFilteredByTypeAndDesc = dataAll.filter(entryTypeFilter).map(entryDetailsMapper);
                var dataFilteredByDescTrimmingEmptyDetailEntries = dataAll.map(entryDetailsMapper).filter(entryNoDetailsFilter);


                • In modern javascript you might want to search on how to use the ... keyword for the mapping callback functions.





                share|improve this answer















                Here are some examples without lodash.



                 var dataAll = [

                type: "human",
                details: [
                id: 1, name: "Peter", description: "friendly, black-hair",
                id: 5, name: "Susan", description: "blond"
                ]
                ,

                type: "animal",
                details: [
                id: 2, name: "Will", description: "lazy, cute",
                id: 3, name: "Bonny", description: "beautiful"
                ]

                ];

                var entryTypeFilter = data => data.type.indexOf("hum") !== -1;
                var entryDetailDescFilter = data => data.description.indexOf("friend") !== -1;
                var entryDetailsMapper = data =>
                return
                type: data.type,
                details: data.details.filter(entryDetailDescFilter)
                ;
                ;
                var entryNoDetailsFilter = data => data.details && data.details.length !== 0;

                var dataFilteredByType = dataAll.filter(entryTypeFilter);
                var dataFilteredByDesc = dataAll.map(entryDetailsMapper);
                var dataFilteredByTypeAndDesc = dataAll.filter(entryTypeFilter).map(entryDetailsMapper);
                var dataFilteredByDescTrimmingEmptyDetailEntries = dataAll.map(entryDetailsMapper).filter(entryNoDetailsFilter);


                • In modern javascript you might want to search on how to use the ... keyword for the mapping callback functions.






                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Nov 11 '18 at 11:45

























                answered Nov 11 '18 at 11:37









                AngelKyriakoAngelKyriako

                36625




                36625



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53248036%2fsearch-filter-nested-array-javascript-lodash%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

                    Edmonton

                    Crossroads (UK TV series)