Problem with nesting macros

Problem with nesting macros



I have written a macro to denote either the Fourier transformation (curly F by itself) or the Fourier transform of a function (curly F followed by a function and enclosed in left( and right) ). It does so by testing if the argument is equal to void or not:


newcommand*fourier[1]ensuremathmathscrFifthenelseequal#1!left(#1right)%



Therefore


fourier



or


fourierf(omega t)



give the expected results.



I wanted to apply fourier twice to a function and therefore wrote


fourierfourierf(x)



However, I'm getting a ! Missing endcsname inserted. error. How should I modify my macro so that it allows nesting? I'm guessing it's because of the ifthenelse construct?


! Missing endcsname inserted.


ifthenelse




2 Answers
2



Similar to Skillmon's original answer, but pretending to be mathtools and sticking to the mandatory argument. The starred version uses left/right, the unstarred version has an optional parameter for big/Big/...


mathtools


left


right


big


Big



Taking the approach to left and right from Mateus Araújo's answer to Spacing around left and right with help from Philipp Stephani (thanks to Ruixi Zhang for the suggestion in the comments)


left


right


documentclass[british]article
usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackagebabel
usepackageamsmath
usepackagemathrsfs
usepackageifthen

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandfourier%
mathscrF%
@ifstar
fourier@paren@star
fourier@paren@expl
newcommandfourier@paren@star[1]%
ifrelaxdetokenize#1relax
else
mathopenmathcloseleft(#1right)%
fi
newcommandfourier@paren@expl[2]%
ifrelaxdetokenize#2relax
else
mathopen#1(#2mathclose#1)%
fi
makeatother

begindocument
[ fourier ]
[ fourierf(omega t) ]
[ fourierfourierf(x) ]
[ fourier*fourier*fracf^22pi(x) ]
enddocument



enter image description here





That space ! before left and right though. Why not use the classic solution by Philipp Stephani: mathopenmathcloseleft( #1 right). For the fourier[big]... variants, I was wondering if there is a possible direct use of bigl and bigr. ;-)
– Ruixi Zhang
Sep 5 '18 at 15:56



!


left


right


mathopenmathcloseleft( #1 right)


fourier[big]...


bigl


bigr





@RuixiZhang Thanks for the hint. I had copied the left right bit from the OP. I'll see if I can find something that works for big->bigl/bigr, though I'm not sure if that is necessary when we already use mathopen and mathclose.
– moewe
Sep 5 '18 at 16:06



left


right


big


bigl


bigr


mathopen


mathclose





@RuixiZhang Given that bigl is just defbiglmathopenbig I don't think the conversion from big to bigl is really necessary here. If anyone is interested I came up with newcommandfrde@size@getlr[3]csnameexpandafter@gobblestring#1#2endcsname#3 which you can use as frde@size@getlrbigl( to get bigl(.
– moewe
Sep 5 '18 at 19:26



bigl


defbiglmathopenbig


big


bigl


newcommandfrde@size@getlr[3]csnameexpandafter@gobblestring#1#2endcsname#3


frde@size@getlrbigl(


bigl(





You are right. Unlike the “simple wrapper” from mathtools which does @nameuse MH_cs_to_str:N ##1 l #2 and @nameuse MH_cs_to_str:N ##1 r #3, going this extra mile to get bigl( just seems convoluted.
– Ruixi Zhang
Sep 5 '18 at 19:47



mathtools


@nameuse MH_cs_to_str:N ##1 l #2


@nameuse MH_cs_to_str:N ##1 r #3


bigl(





@FrédéricDelacroix Many expert users prefer the explicit size commands over the automatic sizing with left/right because the automatic commands may pick out sizes that are unnecessarily large or too small in certain situations (there is even a quote from the TeXbook that acknowledges that and it is reproduced in an answer here, but I can't find that right now).
– moewe
Sep 6 '18 at 8:13



left


right



I'd use the following:


ensuremath


ifthenelse


ifrelaxdetokenize#1relax



I've made a mistake therefore the former code grabbed the arguments wrong. The following uses xparse to grab the arguments in a more robust way. It therefore doesn't use the ifrelaxdetokenize#1relax test but xparse's IfValueT.


xparse


ifrelaxdetokenize#1relax


xparse


IfValueT



Results:


documentclassarticle

usepackagemathrsfs
usepackagexparse

NewDocumentCommand fourier o
%
mathscrFIfValueT#1!left(#1right)%
%

begindocument
$fourier[fourier[f]](x)$
enddocument



enter image description here



Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!



But avoid



To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.



Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.



Please pay close attention to the following guidance:



But avoid



To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.



Required, but never shown



Required, but never shown




By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Edmonton

Crossroads (UK TV series)