Elasticsearch Unicast Weird Behavior in Clustering

Elasticsearch Unicast Weird Behavior in Clustering



I have two nodes each of which forms a cluster (with one empty node).


0.0.0.0:9200 (elasticsearch)
0.0.0.0:9201 (test-1)



Node at 9200 is in cluster elasticsearch (maybe default cluster.name). Node at 9201 is in cluster test-1. (Additionally, important or not, I bind network.hosts of both nodes to 0.0.0.0)


elasticsearch


cluster.name


test-1


network.host



I want to join a new node to test-1. When I leave discovery.zen.ping.unicast.hosts setting commented out alone, the new node is successfully joined to test-1. However, When I set it something else, e.g., ["0.0.0.0"] or ["127.0.1"], it is failed to join...


test-1


discovery.zen.ping.unicast.hosts


test-1


["0.0.0.0"]


["127.0.1"]



Joining a new node to elasticsearch has no problem. ["0.0.0.0"], ["127.0.1"] and ["IP"] all worked well. (But ["0.0.0.0", "ANOTHER-IP"] failed... Please answer about this as well if possible...)


elasticsearch


["0.0.0.0"]


["127.0.1"]


["IP"]


["0.0.0.0", "ANOTHER-IP"]



What causes this joining issue? Have anybody experienced problems like this?





Which version on ElasticSearch are you using?
– ArnavRay
Sep 4 at 3:51





They are all elasticsearch-6.4.0. Do you have any idea?
– GyuHyeon Choi
Sep 4 at 4:57




1 Answer
1



The discovery.zen.ping.unicast.hosts should have the IPs of all the nodes joining the cluster. Do this for all the nodes in the cluster and use IPs not 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1.


discovery.zen.ping.unicast.hosts



As your new node is trying to join the test-1 cluster you can try to change the port of the new node to 9201 and see if it joins.


test-1



The minimal things required to form a cluster:


cluster.name


node.name


discovery.zen.ping.unicast.hosts



gateway.recover_after_nodes and discovery.zen.minimum_master_nodes - comment these lines if they are not already so for all the nodes of the cluster.


gateway.recover_after_nodes


discovery.zen.minimum_master_nodes



Lastly check your firewall settings and disable the firewall if necessary. Check if the nodes can talk to each other.





Is 2. required? Anyway, I will try as you say!
– GyuHyeon Choi
Sep 5 at 5:36



2.





I have tried running a cluster without specifying node names. Its better to have different ones, especially as there are some issues. Hope this solves the problem.
– ArnavRay
Sep 5 at 6:28




Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!



But avoid



To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.



Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.



Please pay close attention to the following guidance:



But avoid



To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.



Required, but never shown



Required, but never shown




By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Edmonton

Crossroads (UK TV series)