Acquire lease on the same azure blob at the same time










1














Noticed the following behavior in my team’s application:



Multiple threads trying to acquire the lease on the same blob using the line below:



await blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(lockTime), null, null, new BlobRequestOptions() RetryPolicy = RetryPolicy , null);


Multiple threads got a lease successfully, each got a different lease, around the same time.
This is because AcquireLeaseAsync is NOT thread-safe right?
I thought lease is a lock, so it can only be granted to one thread at a time?



We tried to add an access condition of lease ID being null, which seems to be helpful.



await blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(lockTime), null, new AccessCondition LeaseId = null, new BlobRequestOptions() RetryPolicy = RetryPolicy , null);


But not sure if it’s fool-proof, i.e is there a chance multiple threads can pass this access condition when trying to acquire lease on the blob?



Below is the code that I use to generate this issue:



class Program

static void Main(string args)

Console.WriteLine("started");
var storageConnStr = "";
var client = CloudStorageAccount.Parse(storageConnStr).CreateCloudBlobClient();
var container = client.GetContainerReference("test");
var blob = container.GetBlobReference("Program.cs");
List<Task> list = new List<Task>();

for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)

list.Add(Task.Run(() => AcquireLease(blob)));

Task.WhenAll(list).Wait();


static void AcquireLease(CloudBlob blob)

try

var id = blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), null, null, null, null).Result;
Console.WriteLine($"Successfully acquired lease on thread Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId, lease id id, time is DateTime.UtcNow");

catch (Exception)

Console.WriteLine($"Got exception at Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId");





Sample output:




Successfully acquired lease on thread 86, lease id
dfbd393e-46e2-49dc-98f4-853356fbc255, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM



Successfully acquired lease on thread 22, lease id
f81b3dbf-68f6-401d-b82e-a1c19fb3527c, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM



Successfully acquired lease on thread 54, lease id
6c05c2ee-c5a5-4d4e-83a9-b65688fca6df, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM











share|improve this question



















  • 3




    I believe the issue is that you're firing an async operation but not waiting for its response. I am sure if you wait for it, you will get an exception that lease can't be acquired.
    – Gaurav Mantri
    Nov 10 at 6:09










  • @GauravMantri Thanks for the response. If you look at the code I used, I think I do wait for the async operation to complete.
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:36










  • blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), null, null, null, null).Result;
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:36










  • Also not sure why AcquireLeaseAsync depends on customer code to achieve leasing atomic?
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:38















1














Noticed the following behavior in my team’s application:



Multiple threads trying to acquire the lease on the same blob using the line below:



await blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(lockTime), null, null, new BlobRequestOptions() RetryPolicy = RetryPolicy , null);


Multiple threads got a lease successfully, each got a different lease, around the same time.
This is because AcquireLeaseAsync is NOT thread-safe right?
I thought lease is a lock, so it can only be granted to one thread at a time?



We tried to add an access condition of lease ID being null, which seems to be helpful.



await blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(lockTime), null, new AccessCondition LeaseId = null, new BlobRequestOptions() RetryPolicy = RetryPolicy , null);


But not sure if it’s fool-proof, i.e is there a chance multiple threads can pass this access condition when trying to acquire lease on the blob?



Below is the code that I use to generate this issue:



class Program

static void Main(string args)

Console.WriteLine("started");
var storageConnStr = "";
var client = CloudStorageAccount.Parse(storageConnStr).CreateCloudBlobClient();
var container = client.GetContainerReference("test");
var blob = container.GetBlobReference("Program.cs");
List<Task> list = new List<Task>();

for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)

list.Add(Task.Run(() => AcquireLease(blob)));

Task.WhenAll(list).Wait();


static void AcquireLease(CloudBlob blob)

try

var id = blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), null, null, null, null).Result;
Console.WriteLine($"Successfully acquired lease on thread Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId, lease id id, time is DateTime.UtcNow");

catch (Exception)

Console.WriteLine($"Got exception at Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId");





Sample output:




Successfully acquired lease on thread 86, lease id
dfbd393e-46e2-49dc-98f4-853356fbc255, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM



Successfully acquired lease on thread 22, lease id
f81b3dbf-68f6-401d-b82e-a1c19fb3527c, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM



Successfully acquired lease on thread 54, lease id
6c05c2ee-c5a5-4d4e-83a9-b65688fca6df, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM











share|improve this question



















  • 3




    I believe the issue is that you're firing an async operation but not waiting for its response. I am sure if you wait for it, you will get an exception that lease can't be acquired.
    – Gaurav Mantri
    Nov 10 at 6:09










  • @GauravMantri Thanks for the response. If you look at the code I used, I think I do wait for the async operation to complete.
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:36










  • blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), null, null, null, null).Result;
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:36










  • Also not sure why AcquireLeaseAsync depends on customer code to achieve leasing atomic?
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:38













1












1








1







Noticed the following behavior in my team’s application:



Multiple threads trying to acquire the lease on the same blob using the line below:



await blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(lockTime), null, null, new BlobRequestOptions() RetryPolicy = RetryPolicy , null);


Multiple threads got a lease successfully, each got a different lease, around the same time.
This is because AcquireLeaseAsync is NOT thread-safe right?
I thought lease is a lock, so it can only be granted to one thread at a time?



We tried to add an access condition of lease ID being null, which seems to be helpful.



await blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(lockTime), null, new AccessCondition LeaseId = null, new BlobRequestOptions() RetryPolicy = RetryPolicy , null);


But not sure if it’s fool-proof, i.e is there a chance multiple threads can pass this access condition when trying to acquire lease on the blob?



Below is the code that I use to generate this issue:



class Program

static void Main(string args)

Console.WriteLine("started");
var storageConnStr = "";
var client = CloudStorageAccount.Parse(storageConnStr).CreateCloudBlobClient();
var container = client.GetContainerReference("test");
var blob = container.GetBlobReference("Program.cs");
List<Task> list = new List<Task>();

for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)

list.Add(Task.Run(() => AcquireLease(blob)));

Task.WhenAll(list).Wait();


static void AcquireLease(CloudBlob blob)

try

var id = blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), null, null, null, null).Result;
Console.WriteLine($"Successfully acquired lease on thread Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId, lease id id, time is DateTime.UtcNow");

catch (Exception)

Console.WriteLine($"Got exception at Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId");





Sample output:




Successfully acquired lease on thread 86, lease id
dfbd393e-46e2-49dc-98f4-853356fbc255, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM



Successfully acquired lease on thread 22, lease id
f81b3dbf-68f6-401d-b82e-a1c19fb3527c, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM



Successfully acquired lease on thread 54, lease id
6c05c2ee-c5a5-4d4e-83a9-b65688fca6df, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM











share|improve this question















Noticed the following behavior in my team’s application:



Multiple threads trying to acquire the lease on the same blob using the line below:



await blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(lockTime), null, null, new BlobRequestOptions() RetryPolicy = RetryPolicy , null);


Multiple threads got a lease successfully, each got a different lease, around the same time.
This is because AcquireLeaseAsync is NOT thread-safe right?
I thought lease is a lock, so it can only be granted to one thread at a time?



We tried to add an access condition of lease ID being null, which seems to be helpful.



await blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(lockTime), null, new AccessCondition LeaseId = null, new BlobRequestOptions() RetryPolicy = RetryPolicy , null);


But not sure if it’s fool-proof, i.e is there a chance multiple threads can pass this access condition when trying to acquire lease on the blob?



Below is the code that I use to generate this issue:



class Program

static void Main(string args)

Console.WriteLine("started");
var storageConnStr = "";
var client = CloudStorageAccount.Parse(storageConnStr).CreateCloudBlobClient();
var container = client.GetContainerReference("test");
var blob = container.GetBlobReference("Program.cs");
List<Task> list = new List<Task>();

for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)

list.Add(Task.Run(() => AcquireLease(blob)));

Task.WhenAll(list).Wait();


static void AcquireLease(CloudBlob blob)

try

var id = blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), null, null, null, null).Result;
Console.WriteLine($"Successfully acquired lease on thread Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId, lease id id, time is DateTime.UtcNow");

catch (Exception)

Console.WriteLine($"Got exception at Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId");





Sample output:




Successfully acquired lease on thread 86, lease id
dfbd393e-46e2-49dc-98f4-853356fbc255, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM



Successfully acquired lease on thread 22, lease id
f81b3dbf-68f6-401d-b82e-a1c19fb3527c, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM



Successfully acquired lease on thread 54, lease id
6c05c2ee-c5a5-4d4e-83a9-b65688fca6df, time is 11/10/2018 2:16:57 AM








c# multithreading azure azure-storage-blobs






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 10 at 5:36









Jayendran

3,20631336




3,20631336










asked Nov 10 at 2:49









checai

123128




123128







  • 3




    I believe the issue is that you're firing an async operation but not waiting for its response. I am sure if you wait for it, you will get an exception that lease can't be acquired.
    – Gaurav Mantri
    Nov 10 at 6:09










  • @GauravMantri Thanks for the response. If you look at the code I used, I think I do wait for the async operation to complete.
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:36










  • blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), null, null, null, null).Result;
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:36










  • Also not sure why AcquireLeaseAsync depends on customer code to achieve leasing atomic?
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:38












  • 3




    I believe the issue is that you're firing an async operation but not waiting for its response. I am sure if you wait for it, you will get an exception that lease can't be acquired.
    – Gaurav Mantri
    Nov 10 at 6:09










  • @GauravMantri Thanks for the response. If you look at the code I used, I think I do wait for the async operation to complete.
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:36










  • blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), null, null, null, null).Result;
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:36










  • Also not sure why AcquireLeaseAsync depends on customer code to achieve leasing atomic?
    – checai
    Nov 10 at 23:38







3




3




I believe the issue is that you're firing an async operation but not waiting for its response. I am sure if you wait for it, you will get an exception that lease can't be acquired.
– Gaurav Mantri
Nov 10 at 6:09




I believe the issue is that you're firing an async operation but not waiting for its response. I am sure if you wait for it, you will get an exception that lease can't be acquired.
– Gaurav Mantri
Nov 10 at 6:09












@GauravMantri Thanks for the response. If you look at the code I used, I think I do wait for the async operation to complete.
– checai
Nov 10 at 23:36




@GauravMantri Thanks for the response. If you look at the code I used, I think I do wait for the async operation to complete.
– checai
Nov 10 at 23:36












blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), null, null, null, null).Result;
– checai
Nov 10 at 23:36




blob.AcquireLeaseAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30), null, null, null, null).Result;
– checai
Nov 10 at 23:36












Also not sure why AcquireLeaseAsync depends on customer code to achieve leasing atomic?
– checai
Nov 10 at 23:38




Also not sure why AcquireLeaseAsync depends on customer code to achieve leasing atomic?
– checai
Nov 10 at 23:38

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53235616%2facquire-lease-on-the-same-azure-blob-at-the-same-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53235616%2facquire-lease-on-the-same-azure-blob-at-the-same-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Crossroads (UK TV series)

ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế