Given a Haskell list, return all sub-lists obtained by removing one element
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I am trying to write a Haskell function which takes a list ls
and returns all sub-lists obtained by removing one element from ls
. An additional constraint is that the returned list of lists must be in the order of the missing element.
Here is what I have. I know there must be a simpler solution.
subOneLists :: [a] -> [[a]]
subOneLists ls = let helper :: [a] -> [a] -> [[a]] -> [[a]]
helper _ ss = ss
helper ps (x:xs) ss = helper ps' xs ss'
where ps' = ps ++ [x]
ss' = ss ++ [ps ++ xs]
in helper ls
λ> subOneLists [1, 2, 3, 4]
[[2,3,4],[1,3,4],[1,2,4],[1,2,3]]
haskell
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to write a Haskell function which takes a list ls
and returns all sub-lists obtained by removing one element from ls
. An additional constraint is that the returned list of lists must be in the order of the missing element.
Here is what I have. I know there must be a simpler solution.
subOneLists :: [a] -> [[a]]
subOneLists ls = let helper :: [a] -> [a] -> [[a]] -> [[a]]
helper _ ss = ss
helper ps (x:xs) ss = helper ps' xs ss'
where ps' = ps ++ [x]
ss' = ss ++ [ps ++ xs]
in helper ls
λ> subOneLists [1, 2, 3, 4]
[[2,3,4],[1,3,4],[1,2,4],[1,2,3]]
haskell
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to write a Haskell function which takes a list ls
and returns all sub-lists obtained by removing one element from ls
. An additional constraint is that the returned list of lists must be in the order of the missing element.
Here is what I have. I know there must be a simpler solution.
subOneLists :: [a] -> [[a]]
subOneLists ls = let helper :: [a] -> [a] -> [[a]] -> [[a]]
helper _ ss = ss
helper ps (x:xs) ss = helper ps' xs ss'
where ps' = ps ++ [x]
ss' = ss ++ [ps ++ xs]
in helper ls
λ> subOneLists [1, 2, 3, 4]
[[2,3,4],[1,3,4],[1,2,4],[1,2,3]]
haskell
$endgroup$
I am trying to write a Haskell function which takes a list ls
and returns all sub-lists obtained by removing one element from ls
. An additional constraint is that the returned list of lists must be in the order of the missing element.
Here is what I have. I know there must be a simpler solution.
subOneLists :: [a] -> [[a]]
subOneLists ls = let helper :: [a] -> [a] -> [[a]] -> [[a]]
helper _ ss = ss
helper ps (x:xs) ss = helper ps' xs ss'
where ps' = ps ++ [x]
ss' = ss ++ [ps ++ xs]
in helper ls
λ> subOneLists [1, 2, 3, 4]
[[2,3,4],[1,3,4],[1,2,4],[1,2,3]]
haskell
haskell
edited Nov 14 '18 at 5:40
200_success
131k17157422
131k17157422
asked Nov 14 '18 at 3:24
PaulPaul
1485
1485
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's a simpler way to implement it:
subOneLists :: [a] -> [[a]]
subOneLists =
subOneLists (x:xs) = xs : map (x :) (subOneLists xs)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is really clever
$endgroup$
– Paul
Nov 14 '18 at 4:10
3
$begingroup$
this repeats the oldinits
bug which makes(last $ subOneLists xs !! n)
quadratic inn
. My version as well as the newer, corrected version ofinits
in the library makes it linear.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
List as an abstract concept can have many representations.
In particular, with a list being represented by its "zipper" - a pairing of a reversed prefix and a suffix, it becomes possible to have a linear solution to this problem, as opposed to the quadratic one which is unavoidable with the plain linear representation :
picks :: [a] -> [([a], [a])]
picks =
picks (x:xs) = go [x] xs
where
go pref suff@(x:xs) = (pref,suff) : go (x:pref) xs
go pref = [(pref,)]
Using this, your problem becomes
foo = map ((a,b) -> revappend (tail a) b) . picks
revappend a b = foldl (flip (:)) b a
This is of course again quadratic, but maybe you could keep the prefixes reversed, to stay linear:
import Control.Arrow (first)
foo' = map (first tail) . picks -- or,
-- = map ((x,y) -> (tail x, y)) . picks
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Look out for standard functions that can help you!
Prelude Data.List> let subOneLists ls = zipWith (++) (inits ls) (tail $ tails ls)
Prelude Data.List> subOneLists [1, 2, 3, 4]
[[2,3,4],[1,3,4],[1,2,4],[1,2,3]]
This uses the fact that the inits
- and tails
-elements at corresponding index always recombine to the original list, but with a variably splitting point:
Prelude Data.List> let ls = [0..7] in mapM_ print (zip (inits ls) (tails ls))
(,[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1],[2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2],[3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3],[4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4],[5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5],[6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6],[7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7],)
If you now “shift up” that tails
, by dropping its head, you effectively lose the head of each of the contained lists:
Prelude Data.List> let ls = [0..7] in mapM_ print (zip (inits ls) (tail $ tails ls))
(,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0],[2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1],[3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2],[4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3],[5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4],[6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5],[7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6],)
And that can just be ++
combined with the inits
again.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
makes me wonder that maybe there should berevinits
in the library somewhere...
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Would probably make more sense to make that a rewrite rule fortails . reverse
, if even necessary.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:44
$begingroup$
I meantreversed_inits [1..] !! 10 == [10,9..1]
. :) (i.e.map reverse . inits
but linear)
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
Ok,reverse . tails . reverse
... yeah, that's ah bit meh. Still – I don't think it's good to packbase
with every combination of reversal and disassembly. If you use any of these, then it's probably not optimal for performance anyway (compared to somethingData.Vector
based), and if performance isn't that critical then just combine simple list functions.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:51
1
$begingroup$
see my updated comment. It's supposed to be linear, that's the point. and work for infinite inputs too.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:52
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207619%2fgiven-a-haskell-list-return-all-sub-lists-obtained-by-removing-one-element%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's a simpler way to implement it:
subOneLists :: [a] -> [[a]]
subOneLists =
subOneLists (x:xs) = xs : map (x :) (subOneLists xs)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is really clever
$endgroup$
– Paul
Nov 14 '18 at 4:10
3
$begingroup$
this repeats the oldinits
bug which makes(last $ subOneLists xs !! n)
quadratic inn
. My version as well as the newer, corrected version ofinits
in the library makes it linear.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a simpler way to implement it:
subOneLists :: [a] -> [[a]]
subOneLists =
subOneLists (x:xs) = xs : map (x :) (subOneLists xs)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is really clever
$endgroup$
– Paul
Nov 14 '18 at 4:10
3
$begingroup$
this repeats the oldinits
bug which makes(last $ subOneLists xs !! n)
quadratic inn
. My version as well as the newer, corrected version ofinits
in the library makes it linear.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a simpler way to implement it:
subOneLists :: [a] -> [[a]]
subOneLists =
subOneLists (x:xs) = xs : map (x :) (subOneLists xs)
$endgroup$
Here's a simpler way to implement it:
subOneLists :: [a] -> [[a]]
subOneLists =
subOneLists (x:xs) = xs : map (x :) (subOneLists xs)
answered Nov 14 '18 at 3:38
4castle4castle
390212
390212
$begingroup$
This is really clever
$endgroup$
– Paul
Nov 14 '18 at 4:10
3
$begingroup$
this repeats the oldinits
bug which makes(last $ subOneLists xs !! n)
quadratic inn
. My version as well as the newer, corrected version ofinits
in the library makes it linear.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is really clever
$endgroup$
– Paul
Nov 14 '18 at 4:10
3
$begingroup$
this repeats the oldinits
bug which makes(last $ subOneLists xs !! n)
quadratic inn
. My version as well as the newer, corrected version ofinits
in the library makes it linear.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
This is really clever
$endgroup$
– Paul
Nov 14 '18 at 4:10
$begingroup$
This is really clever
$endgroup$
– Paul
Nov 14 '18 at 4:10
3
3
$begingroup$
this repeats the old
inits
bug which makes (last $ subOneLists xs !! n)
quadratic in n
. My version as well as the newer, corrected version of inits
in the library makes it linear.$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
this repeats the old
inits
bug which makes (last $ subOneLists xs !! n)
quadratic in n
. My version as well as the newer, corrected version of inits
in the library makes it linear.$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
List as an abstract concept can have many representations.
In particular, with a list being represented by its "zipper" - a pairing of a reversed prefix and a suffix, it becomes possible to have a linear solution to this problem, as opposed to the quadratic one which is unavoidable with the plain linear representation :
picks :: [a] -> [([a], [a])]
picks =
picks (x:xs) = go [x] xs
where
go pref suff@(x:xs) = (pref,suff) : go (x:pref) xs
go pref = [(pref,)]
Using this, your problem becomes
foo = map ((a,b) -> revappend (tail a) b) . picks
revappend a b = foldl (flip (:)) b a
This is of course again quadratic, but maybe you could keep the prefixes reversed, to stay linear:
import Control.Arrow (first)
foo' = map (first tail) . picks -- or,
-- = map ((x,y) -> (tail x, y)) . picks
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
List as an abstract concept can have many representations.
In particular, with a list being represented by its "zipper" - a pairing of a reversed prefix and a suffix, it becomes possible to have a linear solution to this problem, as opposed to the quadratic one which is unavoidable with the plain linear representation :
picks :: [a] -> [([a], [a])]
picks =
picks (x:xs) = go [x] xs
where
go pref suff@(x:xs) = (pref,suff) : go (x:pref) xs
go pref = [(pref,)]
Using this, your problem becomes
foo = map ((a,b) -> revappend (tail a) b) . picks
revappend a b = foldl (flip (:)) b a
This is of course again quadratic, but maybe you could keep the prefixes reversed, to stay linear:
import Control.Arrow (first)
foo' = map (first tail) . picks -- or,
-- = map ((x,y) -> (tail x, y)) . picks
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
List as an abstract concept can have many representations.
In particular, with a list being represented by its "zipper" - a pairing of a reversed prefix and a suffix, it becomes possible to have a linear solution to this problem, as opposed to the quadratic one which is unavoidable with the plain linear representation :
picks :: [a] -> [([a], [a])]
picks =
picks (x:xs) = go [x] xs
where
go pref suff@(x:xs) = (pref,suff) : go (x:pref) xs
go pref = [(pref,)]
Using this, your problem becomes
foo = map ((a,b) -> revappend (tail a) b) . picks
revappend a b = foldl (flip (:)) b a
This is of course again quadratic, but maybe you could keep the prefixes reversed, to stay linear:
import Control.Arrow (first)
foo' = map (first tail) . picks -- or,
-- = map ((x,y) -> (tail x, y)) . picks
$endgroup$
List as an abstract concept can have many representations.
In particular, with a list being represented by its "zipper" - a pairing of a reversed prefix and a suffix, it becomes possible to have a linear solution to this problem, as opposed to the quadratic one which is unavoidable with the plain linear representation :
picks :: [a] -> [([a], [a])]
picks =
picks (x:xs) = go [x] xs
where
go pref suff@(x:xs) = (pref,suff) : go (x:pref) xs
go pref = [(pref,)]
Using this, your problem becomes
foo = map ((a,b) -> revappend (tail a) b) . picks
revappend a b = foldl (flip (:)) b a
This is of course again quadratic, but maybe you could keep the prefixes reversed, to stay linear:
import Control.Arrow (first)
foo' = map (first tail) . picks -- or,
-- = map ((x,y) -> (tail x, y)) . picks
edited Nov 14 '18 at 20:45
answered Nov 14 '18 at 10:19
Will NessWill Ness
7371620
7371620
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Look out for standard functions that can help you!
Prelude Data.List> let subOneLists ls = zipWith (++) (inits ls) (tail $ tails ls)
Prelude Data.List> subOneLists [1, 2, 3, 4]
[[2,3,4],[1,3,4],[1,2,4],[1,2,3]]
This uses the fact that the inits
- and tails
-elements at corresponding index always recombine to the original list, but with a variably splitting point:
Prelude Data.List> let ls = [0..7] in mapM_ print (zip (inits ls) (tails ls))
(,[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1],[2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2],[3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3],[4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4],[5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5],[6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6],[7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7],)
If you now “shift up” that tails
, by dropping its head, you effectively lose the head of each of the contained lists:
Prelude Data.List> let ls = [0..7] in mapM_ print (zip (inits ls) (tail $ tails ls))
(,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0],[2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1],[3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2],[4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3],[5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4],[6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5],[7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6],)
And that can just be ++
combined with the inits
again.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
makes me wonder that maybe there should berevinits
in the library somewhere...
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Would probably make more sense to make that a rewrite rule fortails . reverse
, if even necessary.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:44
$begingroup$
I meantreversed_inits [1..] !! 10 == [10,9..1]
. :) (i.e.map reverse . inits
but linear)
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
Ok,reverse . tails . reverse
... yeah, that's ah bit meh. Still – I don't think it's good to packbase
with every combination of reversal and disassembly. If you use any of these, then it's probably not optimal for performance anyway (compared to somethingData.Vector
based), and if performance isn't that critical then just combine simple list functions.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:51
1
$begingroup$
see my updated comment. It's supposed to be linear, that's the point. and work for infinite inputs too.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:52
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Look out for standard functions that can help you!
Prelude Data.List> let subOneLists ls = zipWith (++) (inits ls) (tail $ tails ls)
Prelude Data.List> subOneLists [1, 2, 3, 4]
[[2,3,4],[1,3,4],[1,2,4],[1,2,3]]
This uses the fact that the inits
- and tails
-elements at corresponding index always recombine to the original list, but with a variably splitting point:
Prelude Data.List> let ls = [0..7] in mapM_ print (zip (inits ls) (tails ls))
(,[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1],[2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2],[3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3],[4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4],[5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5],[6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6],[7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7],)
If you now “shift up” that tails
, by dropping its head, you effectively lose the head of each of the contained lists:
Prelude Data.List> let ls = [0..7] in mapM_ print (zip (inits ls) (tail $ tails ls))
(,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0],[2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1],[3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2],[4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3],[5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4],[6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5],[7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6],)
And that can just be ++
combined with the inits
again.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
makes me wonder that maybe there should berevinits
in the library somewhere...
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Would probably make more sense to make that a rewrite rule fortails . reverse
, if even necessary.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:44
$begingroup$
I meantreversed_inits [1..] !! 10 == [10,9..1]
. :) (i.e.map reverse . inits
but linear)
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
Ok,reverse . tails . reverse
... yeah, that's ah bit meh. Still – I don't think it's good to packbase
with every combination of reversal and disassembly. If you use any of these, then it's probably not optimal for performance anyway (compared to somethingData.Vector
based), and if performance isn't that critical then just combine simple list functions.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:51
1
$begingroup$
see my updated comment. It's supposed to be linear, that's the point. and work for infinite inputs too.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:52
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Look out for standard functions that can help you!
Prelude Data.List> let subOneLists ls = zipWith (++) (inits ls) (tail $ tails ls)
Prelude Data.List> subOneLists [1, 2, 3, 4]
[[2,3,4],[1,3,4],[1,2,4],[1,2,3]]
This uses the fact that the inits
- and tails
-elements at corresponding index always recombine to the original list, but with a variably splitting point:
Prelude Data.List> let ls = [0..7] in mapM_ print (zip (inits ls) (tails ls))
(,[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1],[2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2],[3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3],[4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4],[5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5],[6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6],[7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7],)
If you now “shift up” that tails
, by dropping its head, you effectively lose the head of each of the contained lists:
Prelude Data.List> let ls = [0..7] in mapM_ print (zip (inits ls) (tail $ tails ls))
(,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0],[2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1],[3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2],[4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3],[5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4],[6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5],[7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6],)
And that can just be ++
combined with the inits
again.
$endgroup$
Look out for standard functions that can help you!
Prelude Data.List> let subOneLists ls = zipWith (++) (inits ls) (tail $ tails ls)
Prelude Data.List> subOneLists [1, 2, 3, 4]
[[2,3,4],[1,3,4],[1,2,4],[1,2,3]]
This uses the fact that the inits
- and tails
-elements at corresponding index always recombine to the original list, but with a variably splitting point:
Prelude Data.List> let ls = [0..7] in mapM_ print (zip (inits ls) (tails ls))
(,[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1],[2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2],[3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3],[4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4],[5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5],[6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6],[7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7],)
If you now “shift up” that tails
, by dropping its head, you effectively lose the head of each of the contained lists:
Prelude Data.List> let ls = [0..7] in mapM_ print (zip (inits ls) (tail $ tails ls))
(,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0],[2,3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1],[3,4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2],[4,5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3],[5,6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4],[6,7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5],[7])
([0,1,2,3,4,5,6],)
And that can just be ++
combined with the inits
again.
answered Nov 14 '18 at 11:18
leftaroundaboutleftaroundabout
1513
1513
$begingroup$
makes me wonder that maybe there should berevinits
in the library somewhere...
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Would probably make more sense to make that a rewrite rule fortails . reverse
, if even necessary.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:44
$begingroup$
I meantreversed_inits [1..] !! 10 == [10,9..1]
. :) (i.e.map reverse . inits
but linear)
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
Ok,reverse . tails . reverse
... yeah, that's ah bit meh. Still – I don't think it's good to packbase
with every combination of reversal and disassembly. If you use any of these, then it's probably not optimal for performance anyway (compared to somethingData.Vector
based), and if performance isn't that critical then just combine simple list functions.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:51
1
$begingroup$
see my updated comment. It's supposed to be linear, that's the point. and work for infinite inputs too.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:52
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
makes me wonder that maybe there should berevinits
in the library somewhere...
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Would probably make more sense to make that a rewrite rule fortails . reverse
, if even necessary.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:44
$begingroup$
I meantreversed_inits [1..] !! 10 == [10,9..1]
. :) (i.e.map reverse . inits
but linear)
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
Ok,reverse . tails . reverse
... yeah, that's ah bit meh. Still – I don't think it's good to packbase
with every combination of reversal and disassembly. If you use any of these, then it's probably not optimal for performance anyway (compared to somethingData.Vector
based), and if performance isn't that critical then just combine simple list functions.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:51
1
$begingroup$
see my updated comment. It's supposed to be linear, that's the point. and work for infinite inputs too.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
makes me wonder that maybe there should be
revinits
in the library somewhere...$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:28
$begingroup$
makes me wonder that maybe there should be
revinits
in the library somewhere...$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Would probably make more sense to make that a rewrite rule for
tails . reverse
, if even necessary.$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:44
$begingroup$
Would probably make more sense to make that a rewrite rule for
tails . reverse
, if even necessary.$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:44
$begingroup$
I meant
reversed_inits [1..] !! 10 == [10,9..1]
. :) (i.e. map reverse . inits
but linear)$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
I meant
reversed_inits [1..] !! 10 == [10,9..1]
. :) (i.e. map reverse . inits
but linear)$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
Ok,
reverse . tails . reverse
... yeah, that's ah bit meh. Still – I don't think it's good to pack base
with every combination of reversal and disassembly. If you use any of these, then it's probably not optimal for performance anyway (compared to something Data.Vector
based), and if performance isn't that critical then just combine simple list functions.$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Ok,
reverse . tails . reverse
... yeah, that's ah bit meh. Still – I don't think it's good to pack base
with every combination of reversal and disassembly. If you use any of these, then it's probably not optimal for performance anyway (compared to something Data.Vector
based), and if performance isn't that critical then just combine simple list functions.$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Nov 14 '18 at 13:51
1
1
$begingroup$
see my updated comment. It's supposed to be linear, that's the point. and work for infinite inputs too.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
see my updated comment. It's supposed to be linear, that's the point. and work for infinite inputs too.
$endgroup$
– Will Ness
Nov 14 '18 at 13:52
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207619%2fgiven-a-haskell-list-return-all-sub-lists-obtained-by-removing-one-element%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown