reduce the number of IF statements in Python
reduce the number of IF statements in Python
I have written a function that is going to have up to 72 IF statements
and i was hoping to write code that will be much shorter, but have no idea where to start
The function reads the self.timeselect variable when a radio button is selected and the result is saved to a text file called missing_time.txt. If the result is equal to 1 then save "0000" to the file, if the result is 2 save then 0020 to the text file etc. This can be for 72 possible combinations.
Is there a smarter way to simplify the function ?
def buttonaction():
selectedchoice = ""
if self.timeselect.get() == 1:
selectedchoice = "0000"
orig_stdout = sys.stdout
f = open('missing_time.txt', 'w')
sys.stdout = f
print(selectedchoice)
f.close()
if self.timeselect.get() == 2:
selectedchoice = "0020"
orig_stdout = sys.stdout
f = open('missing_time.txt', 'w')
sys.stdout = f
print(selectedchoice)
f.close()
self.timeselect = tkinter.IntVar()
self.Radio_1 = tkinter.Radiobutton(text="0000",variable =
self.timeselect,indicator = 0 ,value=1)
self.Radio_1.place(x=50,y=200)
self.Radio_2 = tkinter.Radiobutton(text="0020",variable =
self.timeselect,indicator = 0 ,value=2)
self.Radio_2.place(x=90,y=200)
4 Answers
4
choice_map =
1 : "0000",
2 : "0020"
def buttonaction():
selected = self.timeselect.get()
if 0 < selected < 73: # This works as intended in Python
selectedchoice = choice_map[selected]
# Do you intend to append to file instead of replacing it?
# See text below.
with open("missing_time.txt", 'w') as outfile:
outfile.write(selectedchoice + "n")
print(selectedchoice)
Better yet, if there is a pattern that relates the value of self.timeselect.get() to the string that you write out, generate selectchoice directly from that pattern instead of using a dictionary to do the mapping.
self.timeselect.get()
selectchoice
I find it a bit odd that you are clearing the file "missing_time.txt" every time you call buttonaction. If your intention is to append to it, change the file mode accordingly.
buttonaction
Also, instead of opening and closing the file each time, you might just want to open it once and pass the handler to buttonaction or keep it as a global depending on how you use it.
Finally, if you do not intend to catch the KeyError from an invalid key, you can do what @Clifford suggests and use choice_map.get(selected, "some default value that does not have to be str").
choice_map.get(selected, "some default value that does not have to be str")
All you need to do in this case is construct a string from the integer value self.timeselect.get().
self.timeselect.get()
selectedchoice = self.timeselect.get()
if 0 < selectedchoice < 73:
orig_stdout = sys.stdout
f = open('missing_time.txt', 'w')
sys.stdout = f
print( str(selectedchoice).zfill(4) ) # Convert choice to
# string with leading
# zeros to 4 charaters
f.close()
Further in the interests of simplification, redirecting stdout and restoring it is a cumbersome method of outputting to a file. Instead, you can write directly to the file:
with open('missing_time.txt', 'w') as f:
f.write(selectedchoice + "n")
Note that because we use the with context manager here, f is automatically closed when we leave this context so there is no need to call f.close(). Ultimately you end up with:
with
f
f.close()
selectedchoice = self.timeselect.get()
if 0 < selectedchoice < 73:
with open('missing_time.txt', 'w') as f:
f.write( str(selectedchoice).zfill(4) + "n" )
Even if you did use the conditionals each one differs only in the first line, so only that part need be conditional and the remainder of the content performed after the conditionals. Moreover all conditionals are mutually exclusive so you can use else-if:
else-if
if self.timeselect.get() == 1:
selectedchoice = "0000"
elif self.timeselect.get() == 2:
selectedchoice = "0020"
...
if 0 < selectedchoice < 73:
with open('missing_time.txt', 'w') as f:
f.write(selectedchoice + "n")
In circumstances where there is no direct arithmetic relationship between selectchoice and the required string, or the available choices are perhaps not contiguous, it is possible to implement a switch using a dictionary:
selectchoice
switch
choiceToString =
1: "0001",
2: "0002",
...
72: "0072",
selectedchoice = choiceToString.get( self.timeselect.get(), "Invalid Choice")
if selectedchoice != "Invalid Choice":
with open('missing_time.txt', 'w') as f:
f.write(selectedchoice + "n")
f
f.write(selectedchoice + "n")
0 < selectedchoice < 73
@lightalchemist : As you can see I am not a Python programmer; just a programmer! (C++ on embedded systems primarily). I'd apply your suggestions, but am hardly qualified to do so. I answered most of this by googling Python syntax! Feel free to edit for me.
– Clifford
Sep 15 '18 at 8:26
Since there is no switch statement in Python, you can't really reduce the number of if statements. But I see 2 two way to optimize and reduce your code length.
First, you can use some
if condition:
elif condition:
instead of
if condition:
if condition:
since you can't have self.timeselect.get() evaluated to more than one int.
Secondly you can wrap all the code that doesn't vary in a function.
You can get rid of selectedchoice and put
orig_stdout = sys.stdout
f = open('missing_time.txt', 'w')
sys.stdout = f
print(selectedchoice)
f.close()
in a function writeToFile(selectedOption)
I'm assuming that the values are arbitrary and there's no defined pattern. I also see that the only thing that changes in your code is the selectedChoice variable. You can use a Dictionary in such cases. A dictionary's elements are key/value pairs so you can reference the key and get the value.
dictionary =
1:"0000",
2:"0020",
3:"0300",
4:"4000"
def buttonAction():
selectedChoice = dictionary[self.timeselect.get()]
if 0<selectedChoice<=72:
f=open('missing_time.txt','w')
f.write(selectedChoice+" ")
f.close()
print(choice)
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
But avoid …
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy
Very detailed explanation on the reason for the changes. +1. Just a few minor comments. We can write out to file directly using the file object
fusingf.write(selectedchoice + "n")and Python allows the condition to be expressed as0 < selectedchoice < 73. But overall an in depth exposition of the thought process behind the refactor.– lightalchemist
Sep 15 '18 at 8:24