Re-entering USA in the VWP after travelling to Mexico










6















Really hoping someone can give me some advice as I've been searching online and phoned multiple people and seem to be getting no where.



My partner and I are on an 11 month trip. We have spent 3 months in California and have currently been in Mexico for 2 months. We were planning on heading down to Central America before flying to Jamaica (we have a flight back to the UK from Kingston in December). However we have been really struggling with the weather, we definitely under estimated the tropics in summer! There is also a lot of political unrest, obviously an ongoing problem and very sad and distressing for everyone but makes travel hard with roadblocks at borders etc etc.



For these reasons we have been thinking about heading to Vancouver for a few weeks and then back to the states for a couple of months. We would love to see some more of California and also Oregon, visit some friends and do some more camping. We would have a flight out of there in November.



My question is, do we need to apply for another ESTA? Will we be allowed entry as I know Mexico doesn't count as 'leaving North America' and the same for Canada. Are we likely to be allowed entry? We have the funds to support us and a flight out of the country.



Any advice greatly appreciated










share|improve this question
























  • Possible duplicate of Does the 90 days VWP rule ever expire if you travel from the US to Canada?

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 1 '16 at 19:29











  • @JonathanReez: I don't think so -- that question is for someone who is actually going to be living in Canada, whereas the OP here seems to be merely being a tourist/visitor to Mexico. In particular, the reassuring answer to the other question probably won't apply here.

    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 1 '16 at 19:32












  • While the US doesn't have a strict rule like schengen it is likely to be prudent to spend more time out than in. Maybe spend longer in canada and less time in the US?

    – Peter Green
    Jul 1 '16 at 23:58















6















Really hoping someone can give me some advice as I've been searching online and phoned multiple people and seem to be getting no where.



My partner and I are on an 11 month trip. We have spent 3 months in California and have currently been in Mexico for 2 months. We were planning on heading down to Central America before flying to Jamaica (we have a flight back to the UK from Kingston in December). However we have been really struggling with the weather, we definitely under estimated the tropics in summer! There is also a lot of political unrest, obviously an ongoing problem and very sad and distressing for everyone but makes travel hard with roadblocks at borders etc etc.



For these reasons we have been thinking about heading to Vancouver for a few weeks and then back to the states for a couple of months. We would love to see some more of California and also Oregon, visit some friends and do some more camping. We would have a flight out of there in November.



My question is, do we need to apply for another ESTA? Will we be allowed entry as I know Mexico doesn't count as 'leaving North America' and the same for Canada. Are we likely to be allowed entry? We have the funds to support us and a flight out of the country.



Any advice greatly appreciated










share|improve this question
























  • Possible duplicate of Does the 90 days VWP rule ever expire if you travel from the US to Canada?

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 1 '16 at 19:29











  • @JonathanReez: I don't think so -- that question is for someone who is actually going to be living in Canada, whereas the OP here seems to be merely being a tourist/visitor to Mexico. In particular, the reassuring answer to the other question probably won't apply here.

    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 1 '16 at 19:32












  • While the US doesn't have a strict rule like schengen it is likely to be prudent to spend more time out than in. Maybe spend longer in canada and less time in the US?

    – Peter Green
    Jul 1 '16 at 23:58













6












6








6


1






Really hoping someone can give me some advice as I've been searching online and phoned multiple people and seem to be getting no where.



My partner and I are on an 11 month trip. We have spent 3 months in California and have currently been in Mexico for 2 months. We were planning on heading down to Central America before flying to Jamaica (we have a flight back to the UK from Kingston in December). However we have been really struggling with the weather, we definitely under estimated the tropics in summer! There is also a lot of political unrest, obviously an ongoing problem and very sad and distressing for everyone but makes travel hard with roadblocks at borders etc etc.



For these reasons we have been thinking about heading to Vancouver for a few weeks and then back to the states for a couple of months. We would love to see some more of California and also Oregon, visit some friends and do some more camping. We would have a flight out of there in November.



My question is, do we need to apply for another ESTA? Will we be allowed entry as I know Mexico doesn't count as 'leaving North America' and the same for Canada. Are we likely to be allowed entry? We have the funds to support us and a flight out of the country.



Any advice greatly appreciated










share|improve this question
















Really hoping someone can give me some advice as I've been searching online and phoned multiple people and seem to be getting no where.



My partner and I are on an 11 month trip. We have spent 3 months in California and have currently been in Mexico for 2 months. We were planning on heading down to Central America before flying to Jamaica (we have a flight back to the UK from Kingston in December). However we have been really struggling with the weather, we definitely under estimated the tropics in summer! There is also a lot of political unrest, obviously an ongoing problem and very sad and distressing for everyone but makes travel hard with roadblocks at borders etc etc.



For these reasons we have been thinking about heading to Vancouver for a few weeks and then back to the states for a couple of months. We would love to see some more of California and also Oregon, visit some friends and do some more camping. We would have a flight out of there in November.



My question is, do we need to apply for another ESTA? Will we be allowed entry as I know Mexico doesn't count as 'leaving North America' and the same for Canada. Are we likely to be allowed entry? We have the funds to support us and a flight out of the country.



Any advice greatly appreciated







usa mexico us-visa-waiver-program






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 2 '16 at 3:03









phoog

73.3k12159239




73.3k12159239










asked Jul 1 '16 at 19:26









Beth TwydallBeth Twydall

312




312












  • Possible duplicate of Does the 90 days VWP rule ever expire if you travel from the US to Canada?

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 1 '16 at 19:29











  • @JonathanReez: I don't think so -- that question is for someone who is actually going to be living in Canada, whereas the OP here seems to be merely being a tourist/visitor to Mexico. In particular, the reassuring answer to the other question probably won't apply here.

    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 1 '16 at 19:32












  • While the US doesn't have a strict rule like schengen it is likely to be prudent to spend more time out than in. Maybe spend longer in canada and less time in the US?

    – Peter Green
    Jul 1 '16 at 23:58

















  • Possible duplicate of Does the 90 days VWP rule ever expire if you travel from the US to Canada?

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 1 '16 at 19:29











  • @JonathanReez: I don't think so -- that question is for someone who is actually going to be living in Canada, whereas the OP here seems to be merely being a tourist/visitor to Mexico. In particular, the reassuring answer to the other question probably won't apply here.

    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 1 '16 at 19:32












  • While the US doesn't have a strict rule like schengen it is likely to be prudent to spend more time out than in. Maybe spend longer in canada and less time in the US?

    – Peter Green
    Jul 1 '16 at 23:58
















Possible duplicate of Does the 90 days VWP rule ever expire if you travel from the US to Canada?

– JonathanReez
Jul 1 '16 at 19:29





Possible duplicate of Does the 90 days VWP rule ever expire if you travel from the US to Canada?

– JonathanReez
Jul 1 '16 at 19:29













@JonathanReez: I don't think so -- that question is for someone who is actually going to be living in Canada, whereas the OP here seems to be merely being a tourist/visitor to Mexico. In particular, the reassuring answer to the other question probably won't apply here.

– Henning Makholm
Jul 1 '16 at 19:32






@JonathanReez: I don't think so -- that question is for someone who is actually going to be living in Canada, whereas the OP here seems to be merely being a tourist/visitor to Mexico. In particular, the reassuring answer to the other question probably won't apply here.

– Henning Makholm
Jul 1 '16 at 19:32














While the US doesn't have a strict rule like schengen it is likely to be prudent to spend more time out than in. Maybe spend longer in canada and less time in the US?

– Peter Green
Jul 1 '16 at 23:58





While the US doesn't have a strict rule like schengen it is likely to be prudent to spend more time out than in. Maybe spend longer in canada and less time in the US?

– Peter Green
Jul 1 '16 at 23:58










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














There is a fair amount of uncertainty on this site about whether you are likely to be allowed entry. The regulations are vague:




(b) Readmission after departure to contiguous territory or adjacent island. An alien admitted to the United States under this part may be readmitted to the United States after a departure to foreign contiguous territory or adjacent island for the balance of his or her original Visa Waiver Pilot Program admission period if he or she is otherwise admissible and meets all the conditions of this part with the exception of arrival on a signatory carrier.




(Source: 8 CFR §217.3)



Note the word "may."



Explanations of this rule are also somwhat vague:




If you are admitted to the United States under the VWP, you may take a short trip to Canada, Mexico, or a nearby island and generally be readmitted to the United States under the VWP for the remainder of the original 90 days granted upon your initial arrival in the United States. Therefore, the length of time of your total stay, including the short trip, must be 90 days or less. See the CBP website. Citizens of VWP countries who reside in Mexico, Canada, or a nearby island are generally exempted from the requirement to show onward travel to another country* when entering the United States.




(Source: https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/visit/visa-waiver-program.html)



Note again the word "may." The effect of this word is to give fairly wide leeway to the border officer who is admitting you to the US. This means that we can't make accurate predictions about what will happen.



The most favorable fact for you is that you are not returning after a short trip. In fact, you are not returning during your "original ... admission period." So, if the officer admits you, it would have to be for a new admission period.



But on the other hand, if the officer judges that you are trying to abuse the VWP, even if that judgment is incorrect, you will be denied entry. If you're inclined to worry, or if you can't bear the thought of being denied entry, you should apply for a B-2 visa instead.



As Crazydre points out in a comment, howewver, the B-2 visa option is not without its risks:




Just Keep one Thing in mind: they'll put you under even closer scrutiny if you go to the embassy for a B2 visa (when applying for a visa, you're always put into closer scrutiny than if using the VWP), and furthermore, if you're denied a B2 visa your chances of getting a visa in the future will be severely hurt, and you'll never be able to use the VWP again, whereas if refused entry under the VWP (which I doubt will happen if you make sure to bring all documentation to Show if requested, such as your niece's birth certificate) you simply have to go for a visa in the future.







share|improve this answer
































    2














    An ESTA is valid for two years, so unless it expired, you would not Need a new one.



    You spent 3 months in the US (the longest allowed without a visa), and the fact that you're going back so soon and once again spending several months is likely going to raise a big red flag with the border guards.



    I'd say you could very well be let in, but you Need documentation, and not just proof of funds and a return ticket, but most importantly ties to your home Country (pay cheques, property ownership, Family relationships etc.)



    Also, you should Exit Mexico to a Central American Country (even if only for a short period), because visiting Mexico, Canada or the Caribbean doesn't restore the 90-day clock






    share|improve this answer























    • Or they could just apply for a B-2 visa.

      – phoog
      Jul 1 '16 at 19:47











    • A costly and oftentimes time-consuming process which most People would understandably rather avoid. That said, I wouldn't say it's completely unreasonable in their case, but I think with the proper evidence of compelling ties abroad they should be let in on the VWP

      – Crazydre
      Jul 1 '16 at 20:16











    • Going to Central America is also potentially costly and something they might want to avoid. I believe it is also unnecessary.

      – phoog
      Jul 1 '16 at 20:19











    • Nobody knows what's necessary. Going to Central America would improve your situation. Also, at the risk of sounding shamelessly patriotic, I would suggest spending more time in Canada and less in the US. There's a lot of nice stuff up there.

      – DJClayworth
      Jul 2 '16 at 23:32










    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "273"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f72650%2fre-entering-usa-in-the-vwp-after-travelling-to-mexico%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6














    There is a fair amount of uncertainty on this site about whether you are likely to be allowed entry. The regulations are vague:




    (b) Readmission after departure to contiguous territory or adjacent island. An alien admitted to the United States under this part may be readmitted to the United States after a departure to foreign contiguous territory or adjacent island for the balance of his or her original Visa Waiver Pilot Program admission period if he or she is otherwise admissible and meets all the conditions of this part with the exception of arrival on a signatory carrier.




    (Source: 8 CFR §217.3)



    Note the word "may."



    Explanations of this rule are also somwhat vague:




    If you are admitted to the United States under the VWP, you may take a short trip to Canada, Mexico, or a nearby island and generally be readmitted to the United States under the VWP for the remainder of the original 90 days granted upon your initial arrival in the United States. Therefore, the length of time of your total stay, including the short trip, must be 90 days or less. See the CBP website. Citizens of VWP countries who reside in Mexico, Canada, or a nearby island are generally exempted from the requirement to show onward travel to another country* when entering the United States.




    (Source: https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/visit/visa-waiver-program.html)



    Note again the word "may." The effect of this word is to give fairly wide leeway to the border officer who is admitting you to the US. This means that we can't make accurate predictions about what will happen.



    The most favorable fact for you is that you are not returning after a short trip. In fact, you are not returning during your "original ... admission period." So, if the officer admits you, it would have to be for a new admission period.



    But on the other hand, if the officer judges that you are trying to abuse the VWP, even if that judgment is incorrect, you will be denied entry. If you're inclined to worry, or if you can't bear the thought of being denied entry, you should apply for a B-2 visa instead.



    As Crazydre points out in a comment, howewver, the B-2 visa option is not without its risks:




    Just Keep one Thing in mind: they'll put you under even closer scrutiny if you go to the embassy for a B2 visa (when applying for a visa, you're always put into closer scrutiny than if using the VWP), and furthermore, if you're denied a B2 visa your chances of getting a visa in the future will be severely hurt, and you'll never be able to use the VWP again, whereas if refused entry under the VWP (which I doubt will happen if you make sure to bring all documentation to Show if requested, such as your niece's birth certificate) you simply have to go for a visa in the future.







    share|improve this answer





























      6














      There is a fair amount of uncertainty on this site about whether you are likely to be allowed entry. The regulations are vague:




      (b) Readmission after departure to contiguous territory or adjacent island. An alien admitted to the United States under this part may be readmitted to the United States after a departure to foreign contiguous territory or adjacent island for the balance of his or her original Visa Waiver Pilot Program admission period if he or she is otherwise admissible and meets all the conditions of this part with the exception of arrival on a signatory carrier.




      (Source: 8 CFR §217.3)



      Note the word "may."



      Explanations of this rule are also somwhat vague:




      If you are admitted to the United States under the VWP, you may take a short trip to Canada, Mexico, or a nearby island and generally be readmitted to the United States under the VWP for the remainder of the original 90 days granted upon your initial arrival in the United States. Therefore, the length of time of your total stay, including the short trip, must be 90 days or less. See the CBP website. Citizens of VWP countries who reside in Mexico, Canada, or a nearby island are generally exempted from the requirement to show onward travel to another country* when entering the United States.




      (Source: https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/visit/visa-waiver-program.html)



      Note again the word "may." The effect of this word is to give fairly wide leeway to the border officer who is admitting you to the US. This means that we can't make accurate predictions about what will happen.



      The most favorable fact for you is that you are not returning after a short trip. In fact, you are not returning during your "original ... admission period." So, if the officer admits you, it would have to be for a new admission period.



      But on the other hand, if the officer judges that you are trying to abuse the VWP, even if that judgment is incorrect, you will be denied entry. If you're inclined to worry, or if you can't bear the thought of being denied entry, you should apply for a B-2 visa instead.



      As Crazydre points out in a comment, howewver, the B-2 visa option is not without its risks:




      Just Keep one Thing in mind: they'll put you under even closer scrutiny if you go to the embassy for a B2 visa (when applying for a visa, you're always put into closer scrutiny than if using the VWP), and furthermore, if you're denied a B2 visa your chances of getting a visa in the future will be severely hurt, and you'll never be able to use the VWP again, whereas if refused entry under the VWP (which I doubt will happen if you make sure to bring all documentation to Show if requested, such as your niece's birth certificate) you simply have to go for a visa in the future.







      share|improve this answer



























        6












        6








        6







        There is a fair amount of uncertainty on this site about whether you are likely to be allowed entry. The regulations are vague:




        (b) Readmission after departure to contiguous territory or adjacent island. An alien admitted to the United States under this part may be readmitted to the United States after a departure to foreign contiguous territory or adjacent island for the balance of his or her original Visa Waiver Pilot Program admission period if he or she is otherwise admissible and meets all the conditions of this part with the exception of arrival on a signatory carrier.




        (Source: 8 CFR §217.3)



        Note the word "may."



        Explanations of this rule are also somwhat vague:




        If you are admitted to the United States under the VWP, you may take a short trip to Canada, Mexico, or a nearby island and generally be readmitted to the United States under the VWP for the remainder of the original 90 days granted upon your initial arrival in the United States. Therefore, the length of time of your total stay, including the short trip, must be 90 days or less. See the CBP website. Citizens of VWP countries who reside in Mexico, Canada, or a nearby island are generally exempted from the requirement to show onward travel to another country* when entering the United States.




        (Source: https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/visit/visa-waiver-program.html)



        Note again the word "may." The effect of this word is to give fairly wide leeway to the border officer who is admitting you to the US. This means that we can't make accurate predictions about what will happen.



        The most favorable fact for you is that you are not returning after a short trip. In fact, you are not returning during your "original ... admission period." So, if the officer admits you, it would have to be for a new admission period.



        But on the other hand, if the officer judges that you are trying to abuse the VWP, even if that judgment is incorrect, you will be denied entry. If you're inclined to worry, or if you can't bear the thought of being denied entry, you should apply for a B-2 visa instead.



        As Crazydre points out in a comment, howewver, the B-2 visa option is not without its risks:




        Just Keep one Thing in mind: they'll put you under even closer scrutiny if you go to the embassy for a B2 visa (when applying for a visa, you're always put into closer scrutiny than if using the VWP), and furthermore, if you're denied a B2 visa your chances of getting a visa in the future will be severely hurt, and you'll never be able to use the VWP again, whereas if refused entry under the VWP (which I doubt will happen if you make sure to bring all documentation to Show if requested, such as your niece's birth certificate) you simply have to go for a visa in the future.







        share|improve this answer















        There is a fair amount of uncertainty on this site about whether you are likely to be allowed entry. The regulations are vague:




        (b) Readmission after departure to contiguous territory or adjacent island. An alien admitted to the United States under this part may be readmitted to the United States after a departure to foreign contiguous territory or adjacent island for the balance of his or her original Visa Waiver Pilot Program admission period if he or she is otherwise admissible and meets all the conditions of this part with the exception of arrival on a signatory carrier.




        (Source: 8 CFR §217.3)



        Note the word "may."



        Explanations of this rule are also somwhat vague:




        If you are admitted to the United States under the VWP, you may take a short trip to Canada, Mexico, or a nearby island and generally be readmitted to the United States under the VWP for the remainder of the original 90 days granted upon your initial arrival in the United States. Therefore, the length of time of your total stay, including the short trip, must be 90 days or less. See the CBP website. Citizens of VWP countries who reside in Mexico, Canada, or a nearby island are generally exempted from the requirement to show onward travel to another country* when entering the United States.




        (Source: https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/visit/visa-waiver-program.html)



        Note again the word "may." The effect of this word is to give fairly wide leeway to the border officer who is admitting you to the US. This means that we can't make accurate predictions about what will happen.



        The most favorable fact for you is that you are not returning after a short trip. In fact, you are not returning during your "original ... admission period." So, if the officer admits you, it would have to be for a new admission period.



        But on the other hand, if the officer judges that you are trying to abuse the VWP, even if that judgment is incorrect, you will be denied entry. If you're inclined to worry, or if you can't bear the thought of being denied entry, you should apply for a B-2 visa instead.



        As Crazydre points out in a comment, howewver, the B-2 visa option is not without its risks:




        Just Keep one Thing in mind: they'll put you under even closer scrutiny if you go to the embassy for a B2 visa (when applying for a visa, you're always put into closer scrutiny than if using the VWP), and furthermore, if you're denied a B2 visa your chances of getting a visa in the future will be severely hurt, and you'll never be able to use the VWP again, whereas if refused entry under the VWP (which I doubt will happen if you make sure to bring all documentation to Show if requested, such as your niece's birth certificate) you simply have to go for a visa in the future.








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:52









        Community

        1




        1










        answered Jul 1 '16 at 20:11









        phoogphoog

        73.3k12159239




        73.3k12159239























            2














            An ESTA is valid for two years, so unless it expired, you would not Need a new one.



            You spent 3 months in the US (the longest allowed without a visa), and the fact that you're going back so soon and once again spending several months is likely going to raise a big red flag with the border guards.



            I'd say you could very well be let in, but you Need documentation, and not just proof of funds and a return ticket, but most importantly ties to your home Country (pay cheques, property ownership, Family relationships etc.)



            Also, you should Exit Mexico to a Central American Country (even if only for a short period), because visiting Mexico, Canada or the Caribbean doesn't restore the 90-day clock






            share|improve this answer























            • Or they could just apply for a B-2 visa.

              – phoog
              Jul 1 '16 at 19:47











            • A costly and oftentimes time-consuming process which most People would understandably rather avoid. That said, I wouldn't say it's completely unreasonable in their case, but I think with the proper evidence of compelling ties abroad they should be let in on the VWP

              – Crazydre
              Jul 1 '16 at 20:16











            • Going to Central America is also potentially costly and something they might want to avoid. I believe it is also unnecessary.

              – phoog
              Jul 1 '16 at 20:19











            • Nobody knows what's necessary. Going to Central America would improve your situation. Also, at the risk of sounding shamelessly patriotic, I would suggest spending more time in Canada and less in the US. There's a lot of nice stuff up there.

              – DJClayworth
              Jul 2 '16 at 23:32















            2














            An ESTA is valid for two years, so unless it expired, you would not Need a new one.



            You spent 3 months in the US (the longest allowed without a visa), and the fact that you're going back so soon and once again spending several months is likely going to raise a big red flag with the border guards.



            I'd say you could very well be let in, but you Need documentation, and not just proof of funds and a return ticket, but most importantly ties to your home Country (pay cheques, property ownership, Family relationships etc.)



            Also, you should Exit Mexico to a Central American Country (even if only for a short period), because visiting Mexico, Canada or the Caribbean doesn't restore the 90-day clock






            share|improve this answer























            • Or they could just apply for a B-2 visa.

              – phoog
              Jul 1 '16 at 19:47











            • A costly and oftentimes time-consuming process which most People would understandably rather avoid. That said, I wouldn't say it's completely unreasonable in their case, but I think with the proper evidence of compelling ties abroad they should be let in on the VWP

              – Crazydre
              Jul 1 '16 at 20:16











            • Going to Central America is also potentially costly and something they might want to avoid. I believe it is also unnecessary.

              – phoog
              Jul 1 '16 at 20:19











            • Nobody knows what's necessary. Going to Central America would improve your situation. Also, at the risk of sounding shamelessly patriotic, I would suggest spending more time in Canada and less in the US. There's a lot of nice stuff up there.

              – DJClayworth
              Jul 2 '16 at 23:32













            2












            2








            2







            An ESTA is valid for two years, so unless it expired, you would not Need a new one.



            You spent 3 months in the US (the longest allowed without a visa), and the fact that you're going back so soon and once again spending several months is likely going to raise a big red flag with the border guards.



            I'd say you could very well be let in, but you Need documentation, and not just proof of funds and a return ticket, but most importantly ties to your home Country (pay cheques, property ownership, Family relationships etc.)



            Also, you should Exit Mexico to a Central American Country (even if only for a short period), because visiting Mexico, Canada or the Caribbean doesn't restore the 90-day clock






            share|improve this answer













            An ESTA is valid for two years, so unless it expired, you would not Need a new one.



            You spent 3 months in the US (the longest allowed without a visa), and the fact that you're going back so soon and once again spending several months is likely going to raise a big red flag with the border guards.



            I'd say you could very well be let in, but you Need documentation, and not just proof of funds and a return ticket, but most importantly ties to your home Country (pay cheques, property ownership, Family relationships etc.)



            Also, you should Exit Mexico to a Central American Country (even if only for a short period), because visiting Mexico, Canada or the Caribbean doesn't restore the 90-day clock







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jul 1 '16 at 19:37









            CrazydreCrazydre

            53.5k12101237




            53.5k12101237












            • Or they could just apply for a B-2 visa.

              – phoog
              Jul 1 '16 at 19:47











            • A costly and oftentimes time-consuming process which most People would understandably rather avoid. That said, I wouldn't say it's completely unreasonable in their case, but I think with the proper evidence of compelling ties abroad they should be let in on the VWP

              – Crazydre
              Jul 1 '16 at 20:16











            • Going to Central America is also potentially costly and something they might want to avoid. I believe it is also unnecessary.

              – phoog
              Jul 1 '16 at 20:19











            • Nobody knows what's necessary. Going to Central America would improve your situation. Also, at the risk of sounding shamelessly patriotic, I would suggest spending more time in Canada and less in the US. There's a lot of nice stuff up there.

              – DJClayworth
              Jul 2 '16 at 23:32

















            • Or they could just apply for a B-2 visa.

              – phoog
              Jul 1 '16 at 19:47











            • A costly and oftentimes time-consuming process which most People would understandably rather avoid. That said, I wouldn't say it's completely unreasonable in their case, but I think with the proper evidence of compelling ties abroad they should be let in on the VWP

              – Crazydre
              Jul 1 '16 at 20:16











            • Going to Central America is also potentially costly and something they might want to avoid. I believe it is also unnecessary.

              – phoog
              Jul 1 '16 at 20:19











            • Nobody knows what's necessary. Going to Central America would improve your situation. Also, at the risk of sounding shamelessly patriotic, I would suggest spending more time in Canada and less in the US. There's a lot of nice stuff up there.

              – DJClayworth
              Jul 2 '16 at 23:32
















            Or they could just apply for a B-2 visa.

            – phoog
            Jul 1 '16 at 19:47





            Or they could just apply for a B-2 visa.

            – phoog
            Jul 1 '16 at 19:47













            A costly and oftentimes time-consuming process which most People would understandably rather avoid. That said, I wouldn't say it's completely unreasonable in their case, but I think with the proper evidence of compelling ties abroad they should be let in on the VWP

            – Crazydre
            Jul 1 '16 at 20:16





            A costly and oftentimes time-consuming process which most People would understandably rather avoid. That said, I wouldn't say it's completely unreasonable in their case, but I think with the proper evidence of compelling ties abroad they should be let in on the VWP

            – Crazydre
            Jul 1 '16 at 20:16













            Going to Central America is also potentially costly and something they might want to avoid. I believe it is also unnecessary.

            – phoog
            Jul 1 '16 at 20:19





            Going to Central America is also potentially costly and something they might want to avoid. I believe it is also unnecessary.

            – phoog
            Jul 1 '16 at 20:19













            Nobody knows what's necessary. Going to Central America would improve your situation. Also, at the risk of sounding shamelessly patriotic, I would suggest spending more time in Canada and less in the US. There's a lot of nice stuff up there.

            – DJClayworth
            Jul 2 '16 at 23:32





            Nobody knows what's necessary. Going to Central America would improve your situation. Also, at the risk of sounding shamelessly patriotic, I would suggest spending more time in Canada and less in the US. There's a lot of nice stuff up there.

            – DJClayworth
            Jul 2 '16 at 23:32

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f72650%2fre-entering-usa-in-the-vwp-after-travelling-to-mexico%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            Crossroads (UK TV series)

            ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế