Why didn't Picard let Gowron and Duras's son fight for leadership of the Klingon empire in TNG Redemption?










12















It is established in TNG Reunion that the arbiter of succession must choose the two strongest claimants to the chancellor's seat; after that, according to that episode, the two must fight for power.




PICARD: This is not a case of simple mediation. You are asking me to choose the next leader of the Klingon Empire.



K'MPEC: No. By tradition, the two strongest challengers fight for the right of succession. As mediator, only you can designate those challengers.




In TNG Redemption when Gowron is challenged by Duras's illegitimate son Picard must decide whether the challenge is valid.




TORAL: (as Picard is about to put the cloak on Gowron's shoulders) There is one. I will challenge him.



[...]



GOWRON: The illegitimate son of Duras cannot rule the High Council.



K'TAL: The Arbiter will consider his validity. Len'mat.




Picard ultimately decides that the challenge is not valid. Subsequently civil war breaks out between the Duras and Gowron factions. My question is therefore: why? Why not accept the challenge as valid and let Duras's son be easily defeated by Gowron (an adult and an experienced warrior)?










share|improve this question




























    12















    It is established in TNG Reunion that the arbiter of succession must choose the two strongest claimants to the chancellor's seat; after that, according to that episode, the two must fight for power.




    PICARD: This is not a case of simple mediation. You are asking me to choose the next leader of the Klingon Empire.



    K'MPEC: No. By tradition, the two strongest challengers fight for the right of succession. As mediator, only you can designate those challengers.




    In TNG Redemption when Gowron is challenged by Duras's illegitimate son Picard must decide whether the challenge is valid.




    TORAL: (as Picard is about to put the cloak on Gowron's shoulders) There is one. I will challenge him.



    [...]



    GOWRON: The illegitimate son of Duras cannot rule the High Council.



    K'TAL: The Arbiter will consider his validity. Len'mat.




    Picard ultimately decides that the challenge is not valid. Subsequently civil war breaks out between the Duras and Gowron factions. My question is therefore: why? Why not accept the challenge as valid and let Duras's son be easily defeated by Gowron (an adult and an experienced warrior)?










    share|improve this question


























      12












      12








      12


      1






      It is established in TNG Reunion that the arbiter of succession must choose the two strongest claimants to the chancellor's seat; after that, according to that episode, the two must fight for power.




      PICARD: This is not a case of simple mediation. You are asking me to choose the next leader of the Klingon Empire.



      K'MPEC: No. By tradition, the two strongest challengers fight for the right of succession. As mediator, only you can designate those challengers.




      In TNG Redemption when Gowron is challenged by Duras's illegitimate son Picard must decide whether the challenge is valid.




      TORAL: (as Picard is about to put the cloak on Gowron's shoulders) There is one. I will challenge him.



      [...]



      GOWRON: The illegitimate son of Duras cannot rule the High Council.



      K'TAL: The Arbiter will consider his validity. Len'mat.




      Picard ultimately decides that the challenge is not valid. Subsequently civil war breaks out between the Duras and Gowron factions. My question is therefore: why? Why not accept the challenge as valid and let Duras's son be easily defeated by Gowron (an adult and an experienced warrior)?










      share|improve this question
















      It is established in TNG Reunion that the arbiter of succession must choose the two strongest claimants to the chancellor's seat; after that, according to that episode, the two must fight for power.




      PICARD: This is not a case of simple mediation. You are asking me to choose the next leader of the Klingon Empire.



      K'MPEC: No. By tradition, the two strongest challengers fight for the right of succession. As mediator, only you can designate those challengers.




      In TNG Redemption when Gowron is challenged by Duras's illegitimate son Picard must decide whether the challenge is valid.




      TORAL: (as Picard is about to put the cloak on Gowron's shoulders) There is one. I will challenge him.



      [...]



      GOWRON: The illegitimate son of Duras cannot rule the High Council.



      K'TAL: The Arbiter will consider his validity. Len'mat.




      Picard ultimately decides that the challenge is not valid. Subsequently civil war breaks out between the Duras and Gowron factions. My question is therefore: why? Why not accept the challenge as valid and let Duras's son be easily defeated by Gowron (an adult and an experienced warrior)?







      star-trek star-trek-tng






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 11 '18 at 20:31









      TheLethalCarrot

      43k15229279




      43k15229279










      asked Nov 11 '18 at 20:22









      Star Trek StanStar Trek Stan

      634




      634




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          20














          Picard is treading a very fine line here. Although he's well aware that denying the challenge will (in all likelihood) lead to a Klingon civil war, the reality is that the entire reason he was chosen is because he's someone who can interpret the rules of succession without fear or favour.



          Ultimately it comes down to the fact that his personal code of ethics and the Federation's Prime Directive won't allow him to use his position as Arbiter to accept an unjustified position even if it benefits the Federation or advances the cause of the side that he thinks should win out. He simply can't, in good conscience, accept Toral's challenge.



          The screenplay puts it nicely. Although the (corrupt) Klingon Council is willing to accept a boy as a legitimate challenger, the law and precedent don't and neither is Picard.




          Picard (continued): But with due respect to the traditions and laws of this High Council, there is no basis for accepting a petition for leadership from a boy who has fought no battles, shed no blood for his people, earned no honor for himself. Perhaps some day he shall. But not now.



          [There are murmurs and reactions from everyone. Picard knows what the reaction to his decision will be... knows the cost... but also knows there is no other way.]



          TNG: Redemption - Original Screenplay




          Note that although this decision results in war and bloodshed, the long-term result is that a more honourable council eventually takes control. Had Picard allowed the challenge, the boy would have died and Gowron would have become a lame-duck Chancellor surrounded by enemies.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            @T.J.Crowder - Better?

            – Valorum
            Nov 12 '18 at 14:35











          • Great! ........

            – T.J. Crowder
            Nov 12 '18 at 14:37










          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "186"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198334%2fwhy-didnt-picard-let-gowron-and-durass-son-fight-for-leadership-of-the-klingon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          20














          Picard is treading a very fine line here. Although he's well aware that denying the challenge will (in all likelihood) lead to a Klingon civil war, the reality is that the entire reason he was chosen is because he's someone who can interpret the rules of succession without fear or favour.



          Ultimately it comes down to the fact that his personal code of ethics and the Federation's Prime Directive won't allow him to use his position as Arbiter to accept an unjustified position even if it benefits the Federation or advances the cause of the side that he thinks should win out. He simply can't, in good conscience, accept Toral's challenge.



          The screenplay puts it nicely. Although the (corrupt) Klingon Council is willing to accept a boy as a legitimate challenger, the law and precedent don't and neither is Picard.




          Picard (continued): But with due respect to the traditions and laws of this High Council, there is no basis for accepting a petition for leadership from a boy who has fought no battles, shed no blood for his people, earned no honor for himself. Perhaps some day he shall. But not now.



          [There are murmurs and reactions from everyone. Picard knows what the reaction to his decision will be... knows the cost... but also knows there is no other way.]



          TNG: Redemption - Original Screenplay




          Note that although this decision results in war and bloodshed, the long-term result is that a more honourable council eventually takes control. Had Picard allowed the challenge, the boy would have died and Gowron would have become a lame-duck Chancellor surrounded by enemies.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            @T.J.Crowder - Better?

            – Valorum
            Nov 12 '18 at 14:35











          • Great! ........

            – T.J. Crowder
            Nov 12 '18 at 14:37















          20














          Picard is treading a very fine line here. Although he's well aware that denying the challenge will (in all likelihood) lead to a Klingon civil war, the reality is that the entire reason he was chosen is because he's someone who can interpret the rules of succession without fear or favour.



          Ultimately it comes down to the fact that his personal code of ethics and the Federation's Prime Directive won't allow him to use his position as Arbiter to accept an unjustified position even if it benefits the Federation or advances the cause of the side that he thinks should win out. He simply can't, in good conscience, accept Toral's challenge.



          The screenplay puts it nicely. Although the (corrupt) Klingon Council is willing to accept a boy as a legitimate challenger, the law and precedent don't and neither is Picard.




          Picard (continued): But with due respect to the traditions and laws of this High Council, there is no basis for accepting a petition for leadership from a boy who has fought no battles, shed no blood for his people, earned no honor for himself. Perhaps some day he shall. But not now.



          [There are murmurs and reactions from everyone. Picard knows what the reaction to his decision will be... knows the cost... but also knows there is no other way.]



          TNG: Redemption - Original Screenplay




          Note that although this decision results in war and bloodshed, the long-term result is that a more honourable council eventually takes control. Had Picard allowed the challenge, the boy would have died and Gowron would have become a lame-duck Chancellor surrounded by enemies.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            @T.J.Crowder - Better?

            – Valorum
            Nov 12 '18 at 14:35











          • Great! ........

            – T.J. Crowder
            Nov 12 '18 at 14:37













          20












          20








          20







          Picard is treading a very fine line here. Although he's well aware that denying the challenge will (in all likelihood) lead to a Klingon civil war, the reality is that the entire reason he was chosen is because he's someone who can interpret the rules of succession without fear or favour.



          Ultimately it comes down to the fact that his personal code of ethics and the Federation's Prime Directive won't allow him to use his position as Arbiter to accept an unjustified position even if it benefits the Federation or advances the cause of the side that he thinks should win out. He simply can't, in good conscience, accept Toral's challenge.



          The screenplay puts it nicely. Although the (corrupt) Klingon Council is willing to accept a boy as a legitimate challenger, the law and precedent don't and neither is Picard.




          Picard (continued): But with due respect to the traditions and laws of this High Council, there is no basis for accepting a petition for leadership from a boy who has fought no battles, shed no blood for his people, earned no honor for himself. Perhaps some day he shall. But not now.



          [There are murmurs and reactions from everyone. Picard knows what the reaction to his decision will be... knows the cost... but also knows there is no other way.]



          TNG: Redemption - Original Screenplay




          Note that although this decision results in war and bloodshed, the long-term result is that a more honourable council eventually takes control. Had Picard allowed the challenge, the boy would have died and Gowron would have become a lame-duck Chancellor surrounded by enemies.






          share|improve this answer















          Picard is treading a very fine line here. Although he's well aware that denying the challenge will (in all likelihood) lead to a Klingon civil war, the reality is that the entire reason he was chosen is because he's someone who can interpret the rules of succession without fear or favour.



          Ultimately it comes down to the fact that his personal code of ethics and the Federation's Prime Directive won't allow him to use his position as Arbiter to accept an unjustified position even if it benefits the Federation or advances the cause of the side that he thinks should win out. He simply can't, in good conscience, accept Toral's challenge.



          The screenplay puts it nicely. Although the (corrupt) Klingon Council is willing to accept a boy as a legitimate challenger, the law and precedent don't and neither is Picard.




          Picard (continued): But with due respect to the traditions and laws of this High Council, there is no basis for accepting a petition for leadership from a boy who has fought no battles, shed no blood for his people, earned no honor for himself. Perhaps some day he shall. But not now.



          [There are murmurs and reactions from everyone. Picard knows what the reaction to his decision will be... knows the cost... but also knows there is no other way.]



          TNG: Redemption - Original Screenplay




          Note that although this decision results in war and bloodshed, the long-term result is that a more honourable council eventually takes control. Had Picard allowed the challenge, the boy would have died and Gowron would have become a lame-duck Chancellor surrounded by enemies.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 12 '18 at 14:08

























          answered Nov 11 '18 at 21:28









          ValorumValorum

          403k10629373161




          403k10629373161







          • 1





            @T.J.Crowder - Better?

            – Valorum
            Nov 12 '18 at 14:35











          • Great! ........

            – T.J. Crowder
            Nov 12 '18 at 14:37












          • 1





            @T.J.Crowder - Better?

            – Valorum
            Nov 12 '18 at 14:35











          • Great! ........

            – T.J. Crowder
            Nov 12 '18 at 14:37







          1




          1





          @T.J.Crowder - Better?

          – Valorum
          Nov 12 '18 at 14:35





          @T.J.Crowder - Better?

          – Valorum
          Nov 12 '18 at 14:35













          Great! ........

          – T.J. Crowder
          Nov 12 '18 at 14:37





          Great! ........

          – T.J. Crowder
          Nov 12 '18 at 14:37

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198334%2fwhy-didnt-picard-let-gowron-and-durass-son-fight-for-leadership-of-the-klingon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

          Crossroads (UK TV series)

          ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế