ImapClient.ServerCertificateValidationCallback vs ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback
Can I consider ImapClient.ServerCertificateValidationCallback and ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback same? I mean same object (on behind scenes).
In my scenario, I have to collect URLs/values from message body and store in DB, these URLs are WebServices address, values are parameters to be used with WebService.
With all data collected, have to get response from WebServices
For email I HAVE to set ImapClient.ServerCertificateValidationCallback to accept any certificate.
On the other hand for some WebServices I can't bypass certificate validation, so ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback should not be set.
Right now, I'm setting and unsetting each like
????.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = Function(s, c, h, k) True
...do whatetever I need....
????.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = nothing
This seems fine if working in sequence (Mail then WebService).
But what will happen if one user start to check mails and another user start to check URLs? Is there any chance one setting interfere on another?
mailkit
add a comment |
Can I consider ImapClient.ServerCertificateValidationCallback and ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback same? I mean same object (on behind scenes).
In my scenario, I have to collect URLs/values from message body and store in DB, these URLs are WebServices address, values are parameters to be used with WebService.
With all data collected, have to get response from WebServices
For email I HAVE to set ImapClient.ServerCertificateValidationCallback to accept any certificate.
On the other hand for some WebServices I can't bypass certificate validation, so ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback should not be set.
Right now, I'm setting and unsetting each like
????.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = Function(s, c, h, k) True
...do whatetever I need....
????.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = nothing
This seems fine if working in sequence (Mail then WebService).
But what will happen if one user start to check mails and another user start to check URLs? Is there any chance one setting interfere on another?
mailkit
add a comment |
Can I consider ImapClient.ServerCertificateValidationCallback and ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback same? I mean same object (on behind scenes).
In my scenario, I have to collect URLs/values from message body and store in DB, these URLs are WebServices address, values are parameters to be used with WebService.
With all data collected, have to get response from WebServices
For email I HAVE to set ImapClient.ServerCertificateValidationCallback to accept any certificate.
On the other hand for some WebServices I can't bypass certificate validation, so ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback should not be set.
Right now, I'm setting and unsetting each like
????.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = Function(s, c, h, k) True
...do whatetever I need....
????.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = nothing
This seems fine if working in sequence (Mail then WebService).
But what will happen if one user start to check mails and another user start to check URLs? Is there any chance one setting interfere on another?
mailkit
Can I consider ImapClient.ServerCertificateValidationCallback and ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback same? I mean same object (on behind scenes).
In my scenario, I have to collect URLs/values from message body and store in DB, these URLs are WebServices address, values are parameters to be used with WebService.
With all data collected, have to get response from WebServices
For email I HAVE to set ImapClient.ServerCertificateValidationCallback to accept any certificate.
On the other hand for some WebServices I can't bypass certificate validation, so ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback should not be set.
Right now, I'm setting and unsetting each like
????.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = Function(s, c, h, k) True
...do whatetever I need....
????.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = nothing
This seems fine if working in sequence (Mail then WebService).
But what will happen if one user start to check mails and another user start to check URLs? Is there any chance one setting interfere on another?
mailkit
mailkit
asked Nov 11 '18 at 14:47
jzerojzero
215
215
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
MailKit will use the callback that you assign to the ImapClient if non-null, and only fall back to ServicePointManager's callback if none is set on the ImapClient itself.
So ServicePointManager prevail if none is set in ImapClient. Sorry for my ignorance. If I set ImapClient, does ServicePointManager gets changed from any previous value set? If yes I´m in trouble......because at any point in time there will be a conflict
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:41
If you set a callback on the ImapClient, nothing gets set in the ServicePointManager, so you should be fine.
– jstedfast
Nov 11 '18 at 16:43
That is a relief, Thanks
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53249842%2fimapclient-servercertificatevalidationcallback-vs-servicepointmanager-servercert%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
MailKit will use the callback that you assign to the ImapClient if non-null, and only fall back to ServicePointManager's callback if none is set on the ImapClient itself.
So ServicePointManager prevail if none is set in ImapClient. Sorry for my ignorance. If I set ImapClient, does ServicePointManager gets changed from any previous value set? If yes I´m in trouble......because at any point in time there will be a conflict
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:41
If you set a callback on the ImapClient, nothing gets set in the ServicePointManager, so you should be fine.
– jstedfast
Nov 11 '18 at 16:43
That is a relief, Thanks
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
MailKit will use the callback that you assign to the ImapClient if non-null, and only fall back to ServicePointManager's callback if none is set on the ImapClient itself.
So ServicePointManager prevail if none is set in ImapClient. Sorry for my ignorance. If I set ImapClient, does ServicePointManager gets changed from any previous value set? If yes I´m in trouble......because at any point in time there will be a conflict
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:41
If you set a callback on the ImapClient, nothing gets set in the ServicePointManager, so you should be fine.
– jstedfast
Nov 11 '18 at 16:43
That is a relief, Thanks
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
MailKit will use the callback that you assign to the ImapClient if non-null, and only fall back to ServicePointManager's callback if none is set on the ImapClient itself.
MailKit will use the callback that you assign to the ImapClient if non-null, and only fall back to ServicePointManager's callback if none is set on the ImapClient itself.
answered Nov 11 '18 at 15:13
jstedfastjstedfast
18.8k25177
18.8k25177
So ServicePointManager prevail if none is set in ImapClient. Sorry for my ignorance. If I set ImapClient, does ServicePointManager gets changed from any previous value set? If yes I´m in trouble......because at any point in time there will be a conflict
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:41
If you set a callback on the ImapClient, nothing gets set in the ServicePointManager, so you should be fine.
– jstedfast
Nov 11 '18 at 16:43
That is a relief, Thanks
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
So ServicePointManager prevail if none is set in ImapClient. Sorry for my ignorance. If I set ImapClient, does ServicePointManager gets changed from any previous value set? If yes I´m in trouble......because at any point in time there will be a conflict
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:41
If you set a callback on the ImapClient, nothing gets set in the ServicePointManager, so you should be fine.
– jstedfast
Nov 11 '18 at 16:43
That is a relief, Thanks
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:47
So ServicePointManager prevail if none is set in ImapClient. Sorry for my ignorance. If I set ImapClient, does ServicePointManager gets changed from any previous value set? If yes I´m in trouble......because at any point in time there will be a conflict
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:41
So ServicePointManager prevail if none is set in ImapClient. Sorry for my ignorance. If I set ImapClient, does ServicePointManager gets changed from any previous value set? If yes I´m in trouble......because at any point in time there will be a conflict
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:41
If you set a callback on the ImapClient, nothing gets set in the ServicePointManager, so you should be fine.
– jstedfast
Nov 11 '18 at 16:43
If you set a callback on the ImapClient, nothing gets set in the ServicePointManager, so you should be fine.
– jstedfast
Nov 11 '18 at 16:43
That is a relief, Thanks
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:47
That is a relief, Thanks
– jzero
Nov 11 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53249842%2fimapclient-servercertificatevalidationcallback-vs-servicepointmanager-servercert%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown