Elliptical version of Pythagoras’ Theorem?









up vote
22
down vote

favorite
9












Consider any right triangle $triangle ABC$.



We focus on one side, $AC$, and we take the midpoint $E$ of this side. Then, we draw the circle with center in $E$ and passing by $A,C$. If we take the perpendicular to $AC$ passing by $E$, we define a point $I$, where the circle intersects the perpendicular line.



enter image description here



Now, we can draw the ellipse with focii in $A$ and $C$ and passing by $I$.



enter image description here



Clearly, we can apply this procedure to both the other sides, obtaining other two ellipses.



enter image description here



My conjecture is that




The sum of the areas of the ellipses constructed on the two catheti is equal to the area of the ellipse constructed on the hypotenuse.




enter image description here



This is probably a very well known result, and I already apologize with the experts.



However, in order to prove the conjecture, I used the formula of the area of the ellipse, $S=pi a b$, where $a$ and $b$ are the lengths of the semi-axes. Although it is easy to prove that, in the case of all our ellipses, one semi-axis is clearly half the side, I am stuck in the attempt to determine the lengths of the other semi-axes, and I suspect however that there should be a very elementary way to prove such claim.



Again, sorry for the naivety, and thank you very much for any help or suggestion for a compact proof.










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    22
    down vote

    favorite
    9












    Consider any right triangle $triangle ABC$.



    We focus on one side, $AC$, and we take the midpoint $E$ of this side. Then, we draw the circle with center in $E$ and passing by $A,C$. If we take the perpendicular to $AC$ passing by $E$, we define a point $I$, where the circle intersects the perpendicular line.



    enter image description here



    Now, we can draw the ellipse with focii in $A$ and $C$ and passing by $I$.



    enter image description here



    Clearly, we can apply this procedure to both the other sides, obtaining other two ellipses.



    enter image description here



    My conjecture is that




    The sum of the areas of the ellipses constructed on the two catheti is equal to the area of the ellipse constructed on the hypotenuse.




    enter image description here



    This is probably a very well known result, and I already apologize with the experts.



    However, in order to prove the conjecture, I used the formula of the area of the ellipse, $S=pi a b$, where $a$ and $b$ are the lengths of the semi-axes. Although it is easy to prove that, in the case of all our ellipses, one semi-axis is clearly half the side, I am stuck in the attempt to determine the lengths of the other semi-axes, and I suspect however that there should be a very elementary way to prove such claim.



    Again, sorry for the naivety, and thank you very much for any help or suggestion for a compact proof.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      22
      down vote

      favorite
      9









      up vote
      22
      down vote

      favorite
      9






      9





      Consider any right triangle $triangle ABC$.



      We focus on one side, $AC$, and we take the midpoint $E$ of this side. Then, we draw the circle with center in $E$ and passing by $A,C$. If we take the perpendicular to $AC$ passing by $E$, we define a point $I$, where the circle intersects the perpendicular line.



      enter image description here



      Now, we can draw the ellipse with focii in $A$ and $C$ and passing by $I$.



      enter image description here



      Clearly, we can apply this procedure to both the other sides, obtaining other two ellipses.



      enter image description here



      My conjecture is that




      The sum of the areas of the ellipses constructed on the two catheti is equal to the area of the ellipse constructed on the hypotenuse.




      enter image description here



      This is probably a very well known result, and I already apologize with the experts.



      However, in order to prove the conjecture, I used the formula of the area of the ellipse, $S=pi a b$, where $a$ and $b$ are the lengths of the semi-axes. Although it is easy to prove that, in the case of all our ellipses, one semi-axis is clearly half the side, I am stuck in the attempt to determine the lengths of the other semi-axes, and I suspect however that there should be a very elementary way to prove such claim.



      Again, sorry for the naivety, and thank you very much for any help or suggestion for a compact proof.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Consider any right triangle $triangle ABC$.



      We focus on one side, $AC$, and we take the midpoint $E$ of this side. Then, we draw the circle with center in $E$ and passing by $A,C$. If we take the perpendicular to $AC$ passing by $E$, we define a point $I$, where the circle intersects the perpendicular line.



      enter image description here



      Now, we can draw the ellipse with focii in $A$ and $C$ and passing by $I$.



      enter image description here



      Clearly, we can apply this procedure to both the other sides, obtaining other two ellipses.



      enter image description here



      My conjecture is that




      The sum of the areas of the ellipses constructed on the two catheti is equal to the area of the ellipse constructed on the hypotenuse.




      enter image description here



      This is probably a very well known result, and I already apologize with the experts.



      However, in order to prove the conjecture, I used the formula of the area of the ellipse, $S=pi a b$, where $a$ and $b$ are the lengths of the semi-axes. Although it is easy to prove that, in the case of all our ellipses, one semi-axis is clearly half the side, I am stuck in the attempt to determine the lengths of the other semi-axes, and I suspect however that there should be a very elementary way to prove such claim.



      Again, sorry for the naivety, and thank you very much for any help or suggestion for a compact proof.







      geometry euclidean-geometry triangle conic-sections geometric-construction






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 23 at 8:32









      Brahadeesh

      5,58441956




      5,58441956










      asked Aug 23 at 8:03







      user559615



























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          15
          down vote



          accepted










          In an ellipse, $a^2 = b^2 + c^2$, where $a$ is the semi-major, $b$ is the semi-minor, and $c$ is half the focal distance. In your case, $b=c$, so that $a=sqrt2b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 3




            Right! Thanks a lot!
            – user559615
            Aug 23 at 8:12

















          up vote
          20
          down vote













          If you construct similar shapes on the three edges of a right triangle their areas add up as suggested by the Pythagorean theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 1




            Sure. I realize that this is really a trivial question. Sorry, but thanks for replying, however!
            – user559615
            Aug 23 at 8:33











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2891841%2felliptical-version-of-pythagoras-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          15
          down vote



          accepted










          In an ellipse, $a^2 = b^2 + c^2$, where $a$ is the semi-major, $b$ is the semi-minor, and $c$ is half the focal distance. In your case, $b=c$, so that $a=sqrt2b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 3




            Right! Thanks a lot!
            – user559615
            Aug 23 at 8:12














          up vote
          15
          down vote



          accepted










          In an ellipse, $a^2 = b^2 + c^2$, where $a$ is the semi-major, $b$ is the semi-minor, and $c$ is half the focal distance. In your case, $b=c$, so that $a=sqrt2b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 3




            Right! Thanks a lot!
            – user559615
            Aug 23 at 8:12












          up vote
          15
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          15
          down vote



          accepted






          In an ellipse, $a^2 = b^2 + c^2$, where $a$ is the semi-major, $b$ is the semi-minor, and $c$ is half the focal distance. In your case, $b=c$, so that $a=sqrt2b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          In an ellipse, $a^2 = b^2 + c^2$, where $a$ is the semi-major, $b$ is the semi-minor, and $c$ is half the focal distance. In your case, $b=c$, so that $a=sqrt2b$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 23 at 8:09









          what a disgrace

          34316




          34316







          • 3




            Right! Thanks a lot!
            – user559615
            Aug 23 at 8:12












          • 3




            Right! Thanks a lot!
            – user559615
            Aug 23 at 8:12







          3




          3




          Right! Thanks a lot!
          – user559615
          Aug 23 at 8:12




          Right! Thanks a lot!
          – user559615
          Aug 23 at 8:12










          up vote
          20
          down vote













          If you construct similar shapes on the three edges of a right triangle their areas add up as suggested by the Pythagorean theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 1




            Sure. I realize that this is really a trivial question. Sorry, but thanks for replying, however!
            – user559615
            Aug 23 at 8:33















          up vote
          20
          down vote













          If you construct similar shapes on the three edges of a right triangle their areas add up as suggested by the Pythagorean theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 1




            Sure. I realize that this is really a trivial question. Sorry, but thanks for replying, however!
            – user559615
            Aug 23 at 8:33













          up vote
          20
          down vote










          up vote
          20
          down vote









          If you construct similar shapes on the three edges of a right triangle their areas add up as suggested by the Pythagorean theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          If you construct similar shapes on the three edges of a right triangle their areas add up as suggested by the Pythagorean theorem.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 23 at 8:30









          Christian Blatter

          170k7111325




          170k7111325







          • 1




            Sure. I realize that this is really a trivial question. Sorry, but thanks for replying, however!
            – user559615
            Aug 23 at 8:33













          • 1




            Sure. I realize that this is really a trivial question. Sorry, but thanks for replying, however!
            – user559615
            Aug 23 at 8:33








          1




          1




          Sure. I realize that this is really a trivial question. Sorry, but thanks for replying, however!
          – user559615
          Aug 23 at 8:33





          Sure. I realize that this is really a trivial question. Sorry, but thanks for replying, however!
          – user559615
          Aug 23 at 8:33


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2891841%2felliptical-version-of-pythagoras-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

          Edmonton

          Crossroads (UK TV series)