Is there a good way to display map tiles dynamic and real time?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















Ⅰ using python-mapnik(linux)+postgis



I've tried using mapnik to show big data(aboult more than 600,0000 polygon features with much points in postgis),I display it real time from python service without cache. but i meet the problem:
1.At the beginning,load table from database lost much time
2.when I zoom to 12level,map tile will loading slowly



Ⅱ using python(flask)+postgis(MVT)+mapbox-gl



1.display 100,0000 features(simple polygon) so fast,but display big data(aboult more than 600,0000 polygon features with much points in postgis),i find selet query need much time. it's slowly than mapnik



Now I don't know how to complete my research about displaying big vector tiles fast and realtime!!



Is there a persion like me who are interested in quickly displaying data??Any help or suggestion would be appreciated!
At last ,forgive my poor English descrption.



some information about vector tiles I've found,maybe is useful to somebody like me:



  • Vector tiles, PostGIS and OpenLayers

  • An update on MVT encoders

  • Aggregating data for faster map tiles

  • PostGIS Performance Profiling

  • MVT generation: Mapnik vs PostGIS

  • awesome-vector-tiles









share|improve this question
























  • carto.com/blog/inside/An-update-on-MVT-encoders/…

    – Happy Young
    Nov 14 '18 at 6:19

















0















Ⅰ using python-mapnik(linux)+postgis



I've tried using mapnik to show big data(aboult more than 600,0000 polygon features with much points in postgis),I display it real time from python service without cache. but i meet the problem:
1.At the beginning,load table from database lost much time
2.when I zoom to 12level,map tile will loading slowly



Ⅱ using python(flask)+postgis(MVT)+mapbox-gl



1.display 100,0000 features(simple polygon) so fast,but display big data(aboult more than 600,0000 polygon features with much points in postgis),i find selet query need much time. it's slowly than mapnik



Now I don't know how to complete my research about displaying big vector tiles fast and realtime!!



Is there a persion like me who are interested in quickly displaying data??Any help or suggestion would be appreciated!
At last ,forgive my poor English descrption.



some information about vector tiles I've found,maybe is useful to somebody like me:



  • Vector tiles, PostGIS and OpenLayers

  • An update on MVT encoders

  • Aggregating data for faster map tiles

  • PostGIS Performance Profiling

  • MVT generation: Mapnik vs PostGIS

  • awesome-vector-tiles









share|improve this question
























  • carto.com/blog/inside/An-update-on-MVT-encoders/…

    – Happy Young
    Nov 14 '18 at 6:19













0












0








0








Ⅰ using python-mapnik(linux)+postgis



I've tried using mapnik to show big data(aboult more than 600,0000 polygon features with much points in postgis),I display it real time from python service without cache. but i meet the problem:
1.At the beginning,load table from database lost much time
2.when I zoom to 12level,map tile will loading slowly



Ⅱ using python(flask)+postgis(MVT)+mapbox-gl



1.display 100,0000 features(simple polygon) so fast,but display big data(aboult more than 600,0000 polygon features with much points in postgis),i find selet query need much time. it's slowly than mapnik



Now I don't know how to complete my research about displaying big vector tiles fast and realtime!!



Is there a persion like me who are interested in quickly displaying data??Any help or suggestion would be appreciated!
At last ,forgive my poor English descrption.



some information about vector tiles I've found,maybe is useful to somebody like me:



  • Vector tiles, PostGIS and OpenLayers

  • An update on MVT encoders

  • Aggregating data for faster map tiles

  • PostGIS Performance Profiling

  • MVT generation: Mapnik vs PostGIS

  • awesome-vector-tiles









share|improve this question
















Ⅰ using python-mapnik(linux)+postgis



I've tried using mapnik to show big data(aboult more than 600,0000 polygon features with much points in postgis),I display it real time from python service without cache. but i meet the problem:
1.At the beginning,load table from database lost much time
2.when I zoom to 12level,map tile will loading slowly



Ⅱ using python(flask)+postgis(MVT)+mapbox-gl



1.display 100,0000 features(simple polygon) so fast,but display big data(aboult more than 600,0000 polygon features with much points in postgis),i find selet query need much time. it's slowly than mapnik



Now I don't know how to complete my research about displaying big vector tiles fast and realtime!!



Is there a persion like me who are interested in quickly displaying data??Any help or suggestion would be appreciated!
At last ,forgive my poor English descrption.



some information about vector tiles I've found,maybe is useful to somebody like me:



  • Vector tiles, PostGIS and OpenLayers

  • An update on MVT encoders

  • Aggregating data for faster map tiles

  • PostGIS Performance Profiling

  • MVT generation: Mapnik vs PostGIS

  • awesome-vector-tiles






bigdata postgis mapnik cartodb vector-tiles






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 '18 at 9:03







Happy Young

















asked Nov 14 '18 at 2:09









Happy YoungHappy Young

103




103












  • carto.com/blog/inside/An-update-on-MVT-encoders/…

    – Happy Young
    Nov 14 '18 at 6:19

















  • carto.com/blog/inside/An-update-on-MVT-encoders/…

    – Happy Young
    Nov 14 '18 at 6:19
















carto.com/blog/inside/An-update-on-MVT-encoders/…

– Happy Young
Nov 14 '18 at 6:19





carto.com/blog/inside/An-update-on-MVT-encoders/…

– Happy Young
Nov 14 '18 at 6:19












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














You may want to reduce as much as possible the amount of data being transferred from your database to your rendering engine.



This blog post from CARTO may give you some ideas even it's focused in point data.



For polygon datasets, in order to reduce the amount of data moved to the renderer you may want to create simplified versions to use based on the zoom level. Mapshaper is a nice tool to simplify polygons but still retain their topology. And in any case, always combine ST_RemoveRepeatedPoints with ST_SnapToGrid to be sure you are not wasting rendering CPU with wasted pixels.






share|improve this answer























  • Thans for answering! As I know,postgis provides ST_SimplifyPreserveTopology to simplify polygons,I want to calculate tolerance according to different scale. (tolerances = [6378137 * 2 * pi / (2 ** (zoom + 8)) for zoom in range(20)]) and I‘ll try it like you say. Thanks again

    – Happy Young
    Nov 15 '18 at 1:28












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53292198%2fis-there-a-good-way-to-display-map-tiles-dynamic-and-real-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














You may want to reduce as much as possible the amount of data being transferred from your database to your rendering engine.



This blog post from CARTO may give you some ideas even it's focused in point data.



For polygon datasets, in order to reduce the amount of data moved to the renderer you may want to create simplified versions to use based on the zoom level. Mapshaper is a nice tool to simplify polygons but still retain their topology. And in any case, always combine ST_RemoveRepeatedPoints with ST_SnapToGrid to be sure you are not wasting rendering CPU with wasted pixels.






share|improve this answer























  • Thans for answering! As I know,postgis provides ST_SimplifyPreserveTopology to simplify polygons,I want to calculate tolerance according to different scale. (tolerances = [6378137 * 2 * pi / (2 ** (zoom + 8)) for zoom in range(20)]) and I‘ll try it like you say. Thanks again

    – Happy Young
    Nov 15 '18 at 1:28
















0














You may want to reduce as much as possible the amount of data being transferred from your database to your rendering engine.



This blog post from CARTO may give you some ideas even it's focused in point data.



For polygon datasets, in order to reduce the amount of data moved to the renderer you may want to create simplified versions to use based on the zoom level. Mapshaper is a nice tool to simplify polygons but still retain their topology. And in any case, always combine ST_RemoveRepeatedPoints with ST_SnapToGrid to be sure you are not wasting rendering CPU with wasted pixels.






share|improve this answer























  • Thans for answering! As I know,postgis provides ST_SimplifyPreserveTopology to simplify polygons,I want to calculate tolerance according to different scale. (tolerances = [6378137 * 2 * pi / (2 ** (zoom + 8)) for zoom in range(20)]) and I‘ll try it like you say. Thanks again

    – Happy Young
    Nov 15 '18 at 1:28














0












0








0







You may want to reduce as much as possible the amount of data being transferred from your database to your rendering engine.



This blog post from CARTO may give you some ideas even it's focused in point data.



For polygon datasets, in order to reduce the amount of data moved to the renderer you may want to create simplified versions to use based on the zoom level. Mapshaper is a nice tool to simplify polygons but still retain their topology. And in any case, always combine ST_RemoveRepeatedPoints with ST_SnapToGrid to be sure you are not wasting rendering CPU with wasted pixels.






share|improve this answer













You may want to reduce as much as possible the amount of data being transferred from your database to your rendering engine.



This blog post from CARTO may give you some ideas even it's focused in point data.



For polygon datasets, in order to reduce the amount of data moved to the renderer you may want to create simplified versions to use based on the zoom level. Mapshaper is a nice tool to simplify polygons but still retain their topology. And in any case, always combine ST_RemoveRepeatedPoints with ST_SnapToGrid to be sure you are not wasting rendering CPU with wasted pixels.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 '18 at 9:51









Jorge SanzJorge Sanz

30624




30624












  • Thans for answering! As I know,postgis provides ST_SimplifyPreserveTopology to simplify polygons,I want to calculate tolerance according to different scale. (tolerances = [6378137 * 2 * pi / (2 ** (zoom + 8)) for zoom in range(20)]) and I‘ll try it like you say. Thanks again

    – Happy Young
    Nov 15 '18 at 1:28


















  • Thans for answering! As I know,postgis provides ST_SimplifyPreserveTopology to simplify polygons,I want to calculate tolerance according to different scale. (tolerances = [6378137 * 2 * pi / (2 ** (zoom + 8)) for zoom in range(20)]) and I‘ll try it like you say. Thanks again

    – Happy Young
    Nov 15 '18 at 1:28

















Thans for answering! As I know,postgis provides ST_SimplifyPreserveTopology to simplify polygons,I want to calculate tolerance according to different scale. (tolerances = [6378137 * 2 * pi / (2 ** (zoom + 8)) for zoom in range(20)]) and I‘ll try it like you say. Thanks again

– Happy Young
Nov 15 '18 at 1:28






Thans for answering! As I know,postgis provides ST_SimplifyPreserveTopology to simplify polygons,I want to calculate tolerance according to different scale. (tolerances = [6378137 * 2 * pi / (2 ** (zoom + 8)) for zoom in range(20)]) and I‘ll try it like you say. Thanks again

– Happy Young
Nov 15 '18 at 1:28




















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53292198%2fis-there-a-good-way-to-display-map-tiles-dynamic-and-real-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Crossroads (UK TV series)

ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế