Is it legal to bring and carry a baton (weapon, bludgeon) into Denmark?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I have a retractable baton which is a self-defense weapon. (It has no other purpose but as a weapon.) I am considering bringing it on my trip to Denmark, but of course, only if I can be sure it is allowed.
Are such items legal to bring into Denmark?
Are they legal to carry in Denmark?
customs-and-immigration legal denmark cold-weapons
add a comment |
I have a retractable baton which is a self-defense weapon. (It has no other purpose but as a weapon.) I am considering bringing it on my trip to Denmark, but of course, only if I can be sure it is allowed.
Are such items legal to bring into Denmark?
Are they legal to carry in Denmark?
customs-and-immigration legal denmark cold-weapons
22
Out of curiosity, what is the train of thought that made you consider bringing a self-defense weapon to a Western European country? I don't know your current country, but Denmark does not have that much crime. In fact, according to numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp, it's the 3rd safest place in Europe, and only just misses the top 10 worldwide.
– Nzall
Mar 13 '16 at 19:51
It's not that I am very worried about the likelihood of being attacked. Rather it is the particular vulnerability: carrying passport, plane tickets, heavy bags; being in a foreign country where it would not be so easy to deal with the loss of all cash on hand. The best self-defense strategy would be to rent a car (or travel by taxi), but I am planning to avoid that to save money. I should add, even if the national crime rates are low, it does not mean there are not high crime rates in certain areas; and foreign travelers are less likely to know which areas to avoid.
– NotADane
Mar 14 '16 at 19:26
add a comment |
I have a retractable baton which is a self-defense weapon. (It has no other purpose but as a weapon.) I am considering bringing it on my trip to Denmark, but of course, only if I can be sure it is allowed.
Are such items legal to bring into Denmark?
Are they legal to carry in Denmark?
customs-and-immigration legal denmark cold-weapons
I have a retractable baton which is a self-defense weapon. (It has no other purpose but as a weapon.) I am considering bringing it on my trip to Denmark, but of course, only if I can be sure it is allowed.
Are such items legal to bring into Denmark?
Are they legal to carry in Denmark?
customs-and-immigration legal denmark cold-weapons
customs-and-immigration legal denmark cold-weapons
edited Feb 2 '17 at 1:19
pnuts
27.1k368166
27.1k368166
asked Mar 13 '16 at 10:14
NotADaneNotADane
6315
6315
22
Out of curiosity, what is the train of thought that made you consider bringing a self-defense weapon to a Western European country? I don't know your current country, but Denmark does not have that much crime. In fact, according to numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp, it's the 3rd safest place in Europe, and only just misses the top 10 worldwide.
– Nzall
Mar 13 '16 at 19:51
It's not that I am very worried about the likelihood of being attacked. Rather it is the particular vulnerability: carrying passport, plane tickets, heavy bags; being in a foreign country where it would not be so easy to deal with the loss of all cash on hand. The best self-defense strategy would be to rent a car (or travel by taxi), but I am planning to avoid that to save money. I should add, even if the national crime rates are low, it does not mean there are not high crime rates in certain areas; and foreign travelers are less likely to know which areas to avoid.
– NotADane
Mar 14 '16 at 19:26
add a comment |
22
Out of curiosity, what is the train of thought that made you consider bringing a self-defense weapon to a Western European country? I don't know your current country, but Denmark does not have that much crime. In fact, according to numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp, it's the 3rd safest place in Europe, and only just misses the top 10 worldwide.
– Nzall
Mar 13 '16 at 19:51
It's not that I am very worried about the likelihood of being attacked. Rather it is the particular vulnerability: carrying passport, plane tickets, heavy bags; being in a foreign country where it would not be so easy to deal with the loss of all cash on hand. The best self-defense strategy would be to rent a car (or travel by taxi), but I am planning to avoid that to save money. I should add, even if the national crime rates are low, it does not mean there are not high crime rates in certain areas; and foreign travelers are less likely to know which areas to avoid.
– NotADane
Mar 14 '16 at 19:26
22
22
Out of curiosity, what is the train of thought that made you consider bringing a self-defense weapon to a Western European country? I don't know your current country, but Denmark does not have that much crime. In fact, according to numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp, it's the 3rd safest place in Europe, and only just misses the top 10 worldwide.
– Nzall
Mar 13 '16 at 19:51
Out of curiosity, what is the train of thought that made you consider bringing a self-defense weapon to a Western European country? I don't know your current country, but Denmark does not have that much crime. In fact, according to numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp, it's the 3rd safest place in Europe, and only just misses the top 10 worldwide.
– Nzall
Mar 13 '16 at 19:51
It's not that I am very worried about the likelihood of being attacked. Rather it is the particular vulnerability: carrying passport, plane tickets, heavy bags; being in a foreign country where it would not be so easy to deal with the loss of all cash on hand. The best self-defense strategy would be to rent a car (or travel by taxi), but I am planning to avoid that to save money. I should add, even if the national crime rates are low, it does not mean there are not high crime rates in certain areas; and foreign travelers are less likely to know which areas to avoid.
– NotADane
Mar 14 '16 at 19:26
It's not that I am very worried about the likelihood of being attacked. Rather it is the particular vulnerability: carrying passport, plane tickets, heavy bags; being in a foreign country where it would not be so easy to deal with the loss of all cash on hand. The best self-defense strategy would be to rent a car (or travel by taxi), but I am planning to avoid that to save money. I should add, even if the national crime rates are low, it does not mean there are not high crime rates in certain areas; and foreign travelers are less likely to know which areas to avoid.
– NotADane
Mar 14 '16 at 19:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Possession of blunt weapons is illegal in Denmark without a specific permit from the police.
Source: Statutory order concerning weapons and ammunition, etc (in Danish), §16 part 1 (9).
General background (not aimed specifically at the OP who seems already to be willing to follow the rules):
The weapons ban enjoys considerable support among the Danish population* and is vigorously enforced. It is not uncommon for first offenders to receive jail sentences for carrying a knife when going out driking. A baton will probably count as less severe than a knife, but even if you manage to walk free, a 3000-kr ($400) fine can be expected. And averring that the weapon is just for self-defense is unlikely to mollify police or judges.
The foundation of weapons policy debate in Denmark is a near-universal consensus that a nightlife where everybody is armed "for self-defense" is less safe for everyone because it increases the risk that trivial drunken altercations will spiral into something tragic, even where everyone thinks they're just defending themselves. Thus, a significant law-enforcement effort goes into keeping such defensive weaponry out of potentially unstable situations such as nightlife or football matches -- on the theory that visible and firm enforcement of the weapons ban will help everyone else feel safe enough not to try to arm themselves in respone.
*) At least, as regards items that are clearly and exclusively weapons. In contrast, there is an ongoing debate about whether our regulation of knives is overbroad; in some cases it has criminalized knives that were genuinely being used as tools rather than weapons, and a relaxation is presently making its way through parliament.
2
How can they possibly enforce that? I can understand firearm and knife restrictions, and I could see regulating purpose-made retractable batons and the like, but any stick of sufficient length and thickness could be used as an effective blunt weapon. They can't exactly ban sticks...
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 16:36
18
Police and courts do this all the time. Whether something is a weapon or not depends on context. People have been charged with possessing a weapon for carrying a baseball bat, if they have no other baseball equipment and are clearly not going to a baseball game.
– DJClayworth
Mar 13 '16 at 17:23
11
@DJClayworth: Okay, future reference: If you plan to beat somebody up with a baseball bat, bring a glove as well for appearances.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 17:41
5
@user568458 Such flashlights are hardly urban legend. They are sold under the Maglite brand, usually to law enforcement, though anyone can buy one.
– Michael Hampton
Mar 13 '16 at 19:01
13
@DarrelHoffman They can't ban sticks but they can ban you from carrying a stout stick around the middle of town on a Saturday night without a damned good excuse. Context is everything. If you're walking in the forest, somebody attacks you and you pick up a stick to beat them with, that's self-defence; if you walk into the town centre with a stick just in case somebody attacks you, that's carrying a weapon.
– David Richerby
Mar 14 '16 at 1:55
|
show 10 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65156%2fis-it-legal-to-bring-and-carry-a-baton-weapon-bludgeon-into-denmark%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Possession of blunt weapons is illegal in Denmark without a specific permit from the police.
Source: Statutory order concerning weapons and ammunition, etc (in Danish), §16 part 1 (9).
General background (not aimed specifically at the OP who seems already to be willing to follow the rules):
The weapons ban enjoys considerable support among the Danish population* and is vigorously enforced. It is not uncommon for first offenders to receive jail sentences for carrying a knife when going out driking. A baton will probably count as less severe than a knife, but even if you manage to walk free, a 3000-kr ($400) fine can be expected. And averring that the weapon is just for self-defense is unlikely to mollify police or judges.
The foundation of weapons policy debate in Denmark is a near-universal consensus that a nightlife where everybody is armed "for self-defense" is less safe for everyone because it increases the risk that trivial drunken altercations will spiral into something tragic, even where everyone thinks they're just defending themselves. Thus, a significant law-enforcement effort goes into keeping such defensive weaponry out of potentially unstable situations such as nightlife or football matches -- on the theory that visible and firm enforcement of the weapons ban will help everyone else feel safe enough not to try to arm themselves in respone.
*) At least, as regards items that are clearly and exclusively weapons. In contrast, there is an ongoing debate about whether our regulation of knives is overbroad; in some cases it has criminalized knives that were genuinely being used as tools rather than weapons, and a relaxation is presently making its way through parliament.
2
How can they possibly enforce that? I can understand firearm and knife restrictions, and I could see regulating purpose-made retractable batons and the like, but any stick of sufficient length and thickness could be used as an effective blunt weapon. They can't exactly ban sticks...
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 16:36
18
Police and courts do this all the time. Whether something is a weapon or not depends on context. People have been charged with possessing a weapon for carrying a baseball bat, if they have no other baseball equipment and are clearly not going to a baseball game.
– DJClayworth
Mar 13 '16 at 17:23
11
@DJClayworth: Okay, future reference: If you plan to beat somebody up with a baseball bat, bring a glove as well for appearances.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 17:41
5
@user568458 Such flashlights are hardly urban legend. They are sold under the Maglite brand, usually to law enforcement, though anyone can buy one.
– Michael Hampton
Mar 13 '16 at 19:01
13
@DarrelHoffman They can't ban sticks but they can ban you from carrying a stout stick around the middle of town on a Saturday night without a damned good excuse. Context is everything. If you're walking in the forest, somebody attacks you and you pick up a stick to beat them with, that's self-defence; if you walk into the town centre with a stick just in case somebody attacks you, that's carrying a weapon.
– David Richerby
Mar 14 '16 at 1:55
|
show 10 more comments
Possession of blunt weapons is illegal in Denmark without a specific permit from the police.
Source: Statutory order concerning weapons and ammunition, etc (in Danish), §16 part 1 (9).
General background (not aimed specifically at the OP who seems already to be willing to follow the rules):
The weapons ban enjoys considerable support among the Danish population* and is vigorously enforced. It is not uncommon for first offenders to receive jail sentences for carrying a knife when going out driking. A baton will probably count as less severe than a knife, but even if you manage to walk free, a 3000-kr ($400) fine can be expected. And averring that the weapon is just for self-defense is unlikely to mollify police or judges.
The foundation of weapons policy debate in Denmark is a near-universal consensus that a nightlife where everybody is armed "for self-defense" is less safe for everyone because it increases the risk that trivial drunken altercations will spiral into something tragic, even where everyone thinks they're just defending themselves. Thus, a significant law-enforcement effort goes into keeping such defensive weaponry out of potentially unstable situations such as nightlife or football matches -- on the theory that visible and firm enforcement of the weapons ban will help everyone else feel safe enough not to try to arm themselves in respone.
*) At least, as regards items that are clearly and exclusively weapons. In contrast, there is an ongoing debate about whether our regulation of knives is overbroad; in some cases it has criminalized knives that were genuinely being used as tools rather than weapons, and a relaxation is presently making its way through parliament.
2
How can they possibly enforce that? I can understand firearm and knife restrictions, and I could see regulating purpose-made retractable batons and the like, but any stick of sufficient length and thickness could be used as an effective blunt weapon. They can't exactly ban sticks...
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 16:36
18
Police and courts do this all the time. Whether something is a weapon or not depends on context. People have been charged with possessing a weapon for carrying a baseball bat, if they have no other baseball equipment and are clearly not going to a baseball game.
– DJClayworth
Mar 13 '16 at 17:23
11
@DJClayworth: Okay, future reference: If you plan to beat somebody up with a baseball bat, bring a glove as well for appearances.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 17:41
5
@user568458 Such flashlights are hardly urban legend. They are sold under the Maglite brand, usually to law enforcement, though anyone can buy one.
– Michael Hampton
Mar 13 '16 at 19:01
13
@DarrelHoffman They can't ban sticks but they can ban you from carrying a stout stick around the middle of town on a Saturday night without a damned good excuse. Context is everything. If you're walking in the forest, somebody attacks you and you pick up a stick to beat them with, that's self-defence; if you walk into the town centre with a stick just in case somebody attacks you, that's carrying a weapon.
– David Richerby
Mar 14 '16 at 1:55
|
show 10 more comments
Possession of blunt weapons is illegal in Denmark without a specific permit from the police.
Source: Statutory order concerning weapons and ammunition, etc (in Danish), §16 part 1 (9).
General background (not aimed specifically at the OP who seems already to be willing to follow the rules):
The weapons ban enjoys considerable support among the Danish population* and is vigorously enforced. It is not uncommon for first offenders to receive jail sentences for carrying a knife when going out driking. A baton will probably count as less severe than a knife, but even if you manage to walk free, a 3000-kr ($400) fine can be expected. And averring that the weapon is just for self-defense is unlikely to mollify police or judges.
The foundation of weapons policy debate in Denmark is a near-universal consensus that a nightlife where everybody is armed "for self-defense" is less safe for everyone because it increases the risk that trivial drunken altercations will spiral into something tragic, even where everyone thinks they're just defending themselves. Thus, a significant law-enforcement effort goes into keeping such defensive weaponry out of potentially unstable situations such as nightlife or football matches -- on the theory that visible and firm enforcement of the weapons ban will help everyone else feel safe enough not to try to arm themselves in respone.
*) At least, as regards items that are clearly and exclusively weapons. In contrast, there is an ongoing debate about whether our regulation of knives is overbroad; in some cases it has criminalized knives that were genuinely being used as tools rather than weapons, and a relaxation is presently making its way through parliament.
Possession of blunt weapons is illegal in Denmark without a specific permit from the police.
Source: Statutory order concerning weapons and ammunition, etc (in Danish), §16 part 1 (9).
General background (not aimed specifically at the OP who seems already to be willing to follow the rules):
The weapons ban enjoys considerable support among the Danish population* and is vigorously enforced. It is not uncommon for first offenders to receive jail sentences for carrying a knife when going out driking. A baton will probably count as less severe than a knife, but even if you manage to walk free, a 3000-kr ($400) fine can be expected. And averring that the weapon is just for self-defense is unlikely to mollify police or judges.
The foundation of weapons policy debate in Denmark is a near-universal consensus that a nightlife where everybody is armed "for self-defense" is less safe for everyone because it increases the risk that trivial drunken altercations will spiral into something tragic, even where everyone thinks they're just defending themselves. Thus, a significant law-enforcement effort goes into keeping such defensive weaponry out of potentially unstable situations such as nightlife or football matches -- on the theory that visible and firm enforcement of the weapons ban will help everyone else feel safe enough not to try to arm themselves in respone.
*) At least, as regards items that are clearly and exclusively weapons. In contrast, there is an ongoing debate about whether our regulation of knives is overbroad; in some cases it has criminalized knives that were genuinely being used as tools rather than weapons, and a relaxation is presently making its way through parliament.
edited Mar 13 '16 at 23:01
answered Mar 13 '16 at 13:05
Henning MakholmHenning Makholm
44.3k7106165
44.3k7106165
2
How can they possibly enforce that? I can understand firearm and knife restrictions, and I could see regulating purpose-made retractable batons and the like, but any stick of sufficient length and thickness could be used as an effective blunt weapon. They can't exactly ban sticks...
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 16:36
18
Police and courts do this all the time. Whether something is a weapon or not depends on context. People have been charged with possessing a weapon for carrying a baseball bat, if they have no other baseball equipment and are clearly not going to a baseball game.
– DJClayworth
Mar 13 '16 at 17:23
11
@DJClayworth: Okay, future reference: If you plan to beat somebody up with a baseball bat, bring a glove as well for appearances.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 17:41
5
@user568458 Such flashlights are hardly urban legend. They are sold under the Maglite brand, usually to law enforcement, though anyone can buy one.
– Michael Hampton
Mar 13 '16 at 19:01
13
@DarrelHoffman They can't ban sticks but they can ban you from carrying a stout stick around the middle of town on a Saturday night without a damned good excuse. Context is everything. If you're walking in the forest, somebody attacks you and you pick up a stick to beat them with, that's self-defence; if you walk into the town centre with a stick just in case somebody attacks you, that's carrying a weapon.
– David Richerby
Mar 14 '16 at 1:55
|
show 10 more comments
2
How can they possibly enforce that? I can understand firearm and knife restrictions, and I could see regulating purpose-made retractable batons and the like, but any stick of sufficient length and thickness could be used as an effective blunt weapon. They can't exactly ban sticks...
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 16:36
18
Police and courts do this all the time. Whether something is a weapon or not depends on context. People have been charged with possessing a weapon for carrying a baseball bat, if they have no other baseball equipment and are clearly not going to a baseball game.
– DJClayworth
Mar 13 '16 at 17:23
11
@DJClayworth: Okay, future reference: If you plan to beat somebody up with a baseball bat, bring a glove as well for appearances.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 17:41
5
@user568458 Such flashlights are hardly urban legend. They are sold under the Maglite brand, usually to law enforcement, though anyone can buy one.
– Michael Hampton
Mar 13 '16 at 19:01
13
@DarrelHoffman They can't ban sticks but they can ban you from carrying a stout stick around the middle of town on a Saturday night without a damned good excuse. Context is everything. If you're walking in the forest, somebody attacks you and you pick up a stick to beat them with, that's self-defence; if you walk into the town centre with a stick just in case somebody attacks you, that's carrying a weapon.
– David Richerby
Mar 14 '16 at 1:55
2
2
How can they possibly enforce that? I can understand firearm and knife restrictions, and I could see regulating purpose-made retractable batons and the like, but any stick of sufficient length and thickness could be used as an effective blunt weapon. They can't exactly ban sticks...
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 16:36
How can they possibly enforce that? I can understand firearm and knife restrictions, and I could see regulating purpose-made retractable batons and the like, but any stick of sufficient length and thickness could be used as an effective blunt weapon. They can't exactly ban sticks...
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 16:36
18
18
Police and courts do this all the time. Whether something is a weapon or not depends on context. People have been charged with possessing a weapon for carrying a baseball bat, if they have no other baseball equipment and are clearly not going to a baseball game.
– DJClayworth
Mar 13 '16 at 17:23
Police and courts do this all the time. Whether something is a weapon or not depends on context. People have been charged with possessing a weapon for carrying a baseball bat, if they have no other baseball equipment and are clearly not going to a baseball game.
– DJClayworth
Mar 13 '16 at 17:23
11
11
@DJClayworth: Okay, future reference: If you plan to beat somebody up with a baseball bat, bring a glove as well for appearances.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 17:41
@DJClayworth: Okay, future reference: If you plan to beat somebody up with a baseball bat, bring a glove as well for appearances.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 '16 at 17:41
5
5
@user568458 Such flashlights are hardly urban legend. They are sold under the Maglite brand, usually to law enforcement, though anyone can buy one.
– Michael Hampton
Mar 13 '16 at 19:01
@user568458 Such flashlights are hardly urban legend. They are sold under the Maglite brand, usually to law enforcement, though anyone can buy one.
– Michael Hampton
Mar 13 '16 at 19:01
13
13
@DarrelHoffman They can't ban sticks but they can ban you from carrying a stout stick around the middle of town on a Saturday night without a damned good excuse. Context is everything. If you're walking in the forest, somebody attacks you and you pick up a stick to beat them with, that's self-defence; if you walk into the town centre with a stick just in case somebody attacks you, that's carrying a weapon.
– David Richerby
Mar 14 '16 at 1:55
@DarrelHoffman They can't ban sticks but they can ban you from carrying a stout stick around the middle of town on a Saturday night without a damned good excuse. Context is everything. If you're walking in the forest, somebody attacks you and you pick up a stick to beat them with, that's self-defence; if you walk into the town centre with a stick just in case somebody attacks you, that's carrying a weapon.
– David Richerby
Mar 14 '16 at 1:55
|
show 10 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65156%2fis-it-legal-to-bring-and-carry-a-baton-weapon-bludgeon-into-denmark%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
22
Out of curiosity, what is the train of thought that made you consider bringing a self-defense weapon to a Western European country? I don't know your current country, but Denmark does not have that much crime. In fact, according to numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp, it's the 3rd safest place in Europe, and only just misses the top 10 worldwide.
– Nzall
Mar 13 '16 at 19:51
It's not that I am very worried about the likelihood of being attacked. Rather it is the particular vulnerability: carrying passport, plane tickets, heavy bags; being in a foreign country where it would not be so easy to deal with the loss of all cash on hand. The best self-defense strategy would be to rent a car (or travel by taxi), but I am planning to avoid that to save money. I should add, even if the national crime rates are low, it does not mean there are not high crime rates in certain areas; and foreign travelers are less likely to know which areas to avoid.
– NotADane
Mar 14 '16 at 19:26