Summing Bernoulli numbers

Summing Bernoulli numbers



Consider the Bernoulli numbers denoted by $B_n$, which are rational numbers.



It is known that the harmonic numbers $H_n=sum_k=1^nfrac1k$ are not integers once $n>1$.



I am curious about the following:



Question: If $n>0$, will $sum_k=0^nB_k$ ever be an integer?




2 Answers
2



It can never be an integer for $n>0$. There is a result by K.G.C. von Staudt and independently by T. Clausen that
$$B_n+sum_pin mathbbP, ,, p-1frac1pin mathbb Z$$



[1] T. Clausen. Lehrsatz aus einer Abhandlung uber die Bernoullischen Zahlen.
Astr. Nachr., 17:351–352, 1840



[2] K. G. C. von Staudt. Beweis eines Lehrsatzes die Bernoulli'schen Zahlen
betreffend. J. Reine Angew. Math., 21:372–374, 1840



Using this we see that the integrality of $sum_k=0^n B_k$ is equivalent to the integrality of
$$sum_k=2^nleft(sum_pin mathbb P , , , p-1frac1pright)=sum_pin mathbb Pfraclfloorfracnp-1rfloorp$$
If $q$ is the largest prime $le n$ we have $lfloor fracnq-1rfloor =1$ therefore our expression has $q$-valuation $-1$, so is not an integer.



It is never an integer. By Bertrand postulate there exists a prime $p=2s+1$ between $n/2$ and $n$, it divides the denominator of $B_p-1$ and not of other summands in your sum, by von Staudt - Clausen Theorem.



Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!



But avoid



Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.



To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.



Required, but never shown



Required, but never shown




By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Edmonton

Crossroads (UK TV series)