How to increase validation accuracy on medical images










1















I'm working on a medical Xray images dataset trying to do a binary classification.



After many tries, I have a found a model that can overfit my training set with > 99% accuracy but from the validation curve look it seems like my model has only learned irrelevant details.
What do you think ?



enter image description hereenter image description here



When I try to introduce dropout, training become incredibly slow with bad acc.
enter image description hereenter image description here



If I try image augmentation, results are more promising but of course much slower.
enter image description hereenter image description here



I wonder what to look next:



  • try running more epochs on the image augmented model

  • try some medical pretrained model (do you know where to look)

What would you use as parameters for image augmentation (preferably in Keras) with Xray images ?










share|improve this question






















  • To establish, how many images are you using for training and test data? There are many reasons why the validation accuracy may not be rising, but would be good to know how many images you are training on, as well as what types of x-ray images you are working with.

    – Michael Grogan
    Nov 11 '18 at 15:09











  • Hi, I have 40k images in training and 3.6k in validation with 60.8% of negative examples. Those are Musculoskeletal Radiographs of Elbow, Finger, Forearm and Humerus. They are available in RGB but all the channels are equal.

    – S Dufour
    Nov 11 '18 at 15:37











  • While health itself is not my expertise, have you accounted for voxel spacing? Essentially, since you are working with health data, it is likely that you would need to implement spatial normalisation, since this would allow the algorithm to better classify each image while accounting for voxel spacing. This article might provide you with more insights: medium.com/tensorflow/…

    – Michael Grogan
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:18















1















I'm working on a medical Xray images dataset trying to do a binary classification.



After many tries, I have a found a model that can overfit my training set with > 99% accuracy but from the validation curve look it seems like my model has only learned irrelevant details.
What do you think ?



enter image description hereenter image description here



When I try to introduce dropout, training become incredibly slow with bad acc.
enter image description hereenter image description here



If I try image augmentation, results are more promising but of course much slower.
enter image description hereenter image description here



I wonder what to look next:



  • try running more epochs on the image augmented model

  • try some medical pretrained model (do you know where to look)

What would you use as parameters for image augmentation (preferably in Keras) with Xray images ?










share|improve this question






















  • To establish, how many images are you using for training and test data? There are many reasons why the validation accuracy may not be rising, but would be good to know how many images you are training on, as well as what types of x-ray images you are working with.

    – Michael Grogan
    Nov 11 '18 at 15:09











  • Hi, I have 40k images in training and 3.6k in validation with 60.8% of negative examples. Those are Musculoskeletal Radiographs of Elbow, Finger, Forearm and Humerus. They are available in RGB but all the channels are equal.

    – S Dufour
    Nov 11 '18 at 15:37











  • While health itself is not my expertise, have you accounted for voxel spacing? Essentially, since you are working with health data, it is likely that you would need to implement spatial normalisation, since this would allow the algorithm to better classify each image while accounting for voxel spacing. This article might provide you with more insights: medium.com/tensorflow/…

    – Michael Grogan
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:18













1












1








1








I'm working on a medical Xray images dataset trying to do a binary classification.



After many tries, I have a found a model that can overfit my training set with > 99% accuracy but from the validation curve look it seems like my model has only learned irrelevant details.
What do you think ?



enter image description hereenter image description here



When I try to introduce dropout, training become incredibly slow with bad acc.
enter image description hereenter image description here



If I try image augmentation, results are more promising but of course much slower.
enter image description hereenter image description here



I wonder what to look next:



  • try running more epochs on the image augmented model

  • try some medical pretrained model (do you know where to look)

What would you use as parameters for image augmentation (preferably in Keras) with Xray images ?










share|improve this question














I'm working on a medical Xray images dataset trying to do a binary classification.



After many tries, I have a found a model that can overfit my training set with > 99% accuracy but from the validation curve look it seems like my model has only learned irrelevant details.
What do you think ?



enter image description hereenter image description here



When I try to introduce dropout, training become incredibly slow with bad acc.
enter image description hereenter image description here



If I try image augmentation, results are more promising but of course much slower.
enter image description hereenter image description here



I wonder what to look next:



  • try running more epochs on the image augmented model

  • try some medical pretrained model (do you know where to look)

What would you use as parameters for image augmentation (preferably in Keras) with Xray images ?







tensorflow keras computer-vision medical






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 11 '18 at 8:50









S DufourS Dufour

152




152












  • To establish, how many images are you using for training and test data? There are many reasons why the validation accuracy may not be rising, but would be good to know how many images you are training on, as well as what types of x-ray images you are working with.

    – Michael Grogan
    Nov 11 '18 at 15:09











  • Hi, I have 40k images in training and 3.6k in validation with 60.8% of negative examples. Those are Musculoskeletal Radiographs of Elbow, Finger, Forearm and Humerus. They are available in RGB but all the channels are equal.

    – S Dufour
    Nov 11 '18 at 15:37











  • While health itself is not my expertise, have you accounted for voxel spacing? Essentially, since you are working with health data, it is likely that you would need to implement spatial normalisation, since this would allow the algorithm to better classify each image while accounting for voxel spacing. This article might provide you with more insights: medium.com/tensorflow/…

    – Michael Grogan
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:18

















  • To establish, how many images are you using for training and test data? There are many reasons why the validation accuracy may not be rising, but would be good to know how many images you are training on, as well as what types of x-ray images you are working with.

    – Michael Grogan
    Nov 11 '18 at 15:09











  • Hi, I have 40k images in training and 3.6k in validation with 60.8% of negative examples. Those are Musculoskeletal Radiographs of Elbow, Finger, Forearm and Humerus. They are available in RGB but all the channels are equal.

    – S Dufour
    Nov 11 '18 at 15:37











  • While health itself is not my expertise, have you accounted for voxel spacing? Essentially, since you are working with health data, it is likely that you would need to implement spatial normalisation, since this would allow the algorithm to better classify each image while accounting for voxel spacing. This article might provide you with more insights: medium.com/tensorflow/…

    – Michael Grogan
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:18
















To establish, how many images are you using for training and test data? There are many reasons why the validation accuracy may not be rising, but would be good to know how many images you are training on, as well as what types of x-ray images you are working with.

– Michael Grogan
Nov 11 '18 at 15:09





To establish, how many images are you using for training and test data? There are many reasons why the validation accuracy may not be rising, but would be good to know how many images you are training on, as well as what types of x-ray images you are working with.

– Michael Grogan
Nov 11 '18 at 15:09













Hi, I have 40k images in training and 3.6k in validation with 60.8% of negative examples. Those are Musculoskeletal Radiographs of Elbow, Finger, Forearm and Humerus. They are available in RGB but all the channels are equal.

– S Dufour
Nov 11 '18 at 15:37





Hi, I have 40k images in training and 3.6k in validation with 60.8% of negative examples. Those are Musculoskeletal Radiographs of Elbow, Finger, Forearm and Humerus. They are available in RGB but all the channels are equal.

– S Dufour
Nov 11 '18 at 15:37













While health itself is not my expertise, have you accounted for voxel spacing? Essentially, since you are working with health data, it is likely that you would need to implement spatial normalisation, since this would allow the algorithm to better classify each image while accounting for voxel spacing. This article might provide you with more insights: medium.com/tensorflow/…

– Michael Grogan
Nov 14 '18 at 15:18





While health itself is not my expertise, have you accounted for voxel spacing? Essentially, since you are working with health data, it is likely that you would need to implement spatial normalisation, since this would allow the algorithm to better classify each image while accounting for voxel spacing. This article might provide you with more insights: medium.com/tensorflow/…

– Michael Grogan
Nov 14 '18 at 15:18












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53247146%2fhow-to-increase-validation-accuracy-on-medical-images%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53247146%2fhow-to-increase-validation-accuracy-on-medical-images%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Crossroads (UK TV series)

ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế