What is the word that means “not saying anything bad in any way about someone”?
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
I have this sentence where I used the word infringement, and I think I'm exaggerating things a bit by choosing it. Moreover, I want it to mean: not saying anything bad in any way about someone, not speaking of them badly.
The sentence:
How do I explain my stance without infringement his family and without
putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
So, is there a suitable word to put it instead of infringement?
Also, about the word stance, does it mean position? And, does it fit in that sentence?
word-choice sentence-construction word-request
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
I have this sentence where I used the word infringement, and I think I'm exaggerating things a bit by choosing it. Moreover, I want it to mean: not saying anything bad in any way about someone, not speaking of them badly.
The sentence:
How do I explain my stance without infringement his family and without
putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
So, is there a suitable word to put it instead of infringement?
Also, about the word stance, does it mean position? And, does it fit in that sentence?
word-choice sentence-construction word-request
4
Using "infringement" here isn't 'exaggerating things a bit', it's just wrong. It doesn't fit in the sentence grammatically and it doesn't have the meaning you suggest.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:01
@MichaelKay Consider it infringing, so it would be grammatically correct.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 25 at 8:08
1
@TasneemZh in·fringe (v) - actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
– Sinjai
Aug 25 at 18:38
1
The sentence construction just doesn’t sound natural, regardless of the word you choose. Perhaps you want something like “without insulting...” or “without impugning his family’s pride/honor.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:37
1
@MichaelKay You can certainly infringe upon someone, in the sense of “to encroach.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:39
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
I have this sentence where I used the word infringement, and I think I'm exaggerating things a bit by choosing it. Moreover, I want it to mean: not saying anything bad in any way about someone, not speaking of them badly.
The sentence:
How do I explain my stance without infringement his family and without
putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
So, is there a suitable word to put it instead of infringement?
Also, about the word stance, does it mean position? And, does it fit in that sentence?
word-choice sentence-construction word-request
I have this sentence where I used the word infringement, and I think I'm exaggerating things a bit by choosing it. Moreover, I want it to mean: not saying anything bad in any way about someone, not speaking of them badly.
The sentence:
How do I explain my stance without infringement his family and without
putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
So, is there a suitable word to put it instead of infringement?
Also, about the word stance, does it mean position? And, does it fit in that sentence?
word-choice sentence-construction word-request
word-choice sentence-construction word-request
edited Aug 24 at 7:52
RubioRic
4,0541931
4,0541931
asked Aug 24 at 7:31
Tasneem Zh
160112
160112
4
Using "infringement" here isn't 'exaggerating things a bit', it's just wrong. It doesn't fit in the sentence grammatically and it doesn't have the meaning you suggest.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:01
@MichaelKay Consider it infringing, so it would be grammatically correct.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 25 at 8:08
1
@TasneemZh in·fringe (v) - actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
– Sinjai
Aug 25 at 18:38
1
The sentence construction just doesn’t sound natural, regardless of the word you choose. Perhaps you want something like “without insulting...” or “without impugning his family’s pride/honor.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:37
1
@MichaelKay You can certainly infringe upon someone, in the sense of “to encroach.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:39
|
show 1 more comment
4
Using "infringement" here isn't 'exaggerating things a bit', it's just wrong. It doesn't fit in the sentence grammatically and it doesn't have the meaning you suggest.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:01
@MichaelKay Consider it infringing, so it would be grammatically correct.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 25 at 8:08
1
@TasneemZh in·fringe (v) - actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
– Sinjai
Aug 25 at 18:38
1
The sentence construction just doesn’t sound natural, regardless of the word you choose. Perhaps you want something like “without insulting...” or “without impugning his family’s pride/honor.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:37
1
@MichaelKay You can certainly infringe upon someone, in the sense of “to encroach.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:39
4
4
Using "infringement" here isn't 'exaggerating things a bit', it's just wrong. It doesn't fit in the sentence grammatically and it doesn't have the meaning you suggest.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:01
Using "infringement" here isn't 'exaggerating things a bit', it's just wrong. It doesn't fit in the sentence grammatically and it doesn't have the meaning you suggest.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:01
@MichaelKay Consider it infringing, so it would be grammatically correct.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 25 at 8:08
@MichaelKay Consider it infringing, so it would be grammatically correct.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 25 at 8:08
1
1
@TasneemZh in·fringe (v) - actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
– Sinjai
Aug 25 at 18:38
@TasneemZh in·fringe (v) - actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
– Sinjai
Aug 25 at 18:38
1
1
The sentence construction just doesn’t sound natural, regardless of the word you choose. Perhaps you want something like “without insulting...” or “without impugning his family’s pride/honor.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:37
The sentence construction just doesn’t sound natural, regardless of the word you choose. Perhaps you want something like “without insulting...” or “without impugning his family’s pride/honor.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:37
1
1
@MichaelKay You can certainly infringe upon someone, in the sense of “to encroach.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:39
@MichaelKay You can certainly infringe upon someone, in the sense of “to encroach.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:39
|
show 1 more comment
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
Because your question asks for a term that means the opposite of "infringing" or "disparaging", the word I would recommend is "tact."
tact
a keen sense of what to do or say in order to maintain good relations with others or avoid offense
The peace talks required great tact on the part of both leaders.
The word "tact" is often used in the form of an adjective ("tactful") or an adverb ("tactfully"). One might also say that something must be said "with tact." The sentence you provided could then become:
How do I explain my stance with tact, so that I do not offend his family or put myself in an awkward position with him?
The reconstruction of my sentence that you made with the words tact and offend is perfect. That's why I chose this answer as the best one.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 15:50
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
It should be infringing and it’s not clear to me what it could mean in this example. Your usage of stance seems correct here.
You could consider disparaging:
disparage
transitive verb
If you disparage someone or something, you speak about them in a way which shows that you do not have a good opinion of them.
[formal]
...Larkin's tendency to disparage literature.
(Collins Dictionary)
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
If the context is that you're trying not to say something bad about the family, you could possibly use casting apsersions?
cast aspersions
to say harsh critical things about someone or someone's character
[formal]
...He tried to discuss his political opponents respectfully, without casting aspersions.
(Merriam-Webster Dictionary)
So in your case, that would be
How do I explain my stance without casting aspersions on his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
If I write that expression in my story, would the native English readers understand it? Or should I clarify what cast aspersions means because it is rare as I last checked?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 13:21
2
it might be rare but it isn't obsolete, do not be afraid of expanding your or others vocabulary, with good words. if we only ever use words 100% of our audience understand we will end up writing peter and jane stories, as nobody will ever learn any new words. (mylearningkid.net/product/…)
– WendyG
Aug 24 at 13:56
1
I went with the Merriam-Webster definition as I wasn't sure how common the usage is elsewhere, but in Ireland and the UK it wouldn't be that rare.
– Mick O'Hea
Aug 24 at 15:04
2
Cast aspersions is very good here. It is very used across all varieties of English. It is not rare. It is an idiomatic expression.
– Lambie
Aug 24 at 20:22
I think "disparaging" is closer to the meaning the OP wants to convey. To my mind "casting aspersions" is not directly saying something bad about someone, rather it is hinting that there might be bad things that could be said.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:04
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
In my opinion, you can both use stance and position.
Instead of infringement (which should be without infringing
in your sentence, by the way) I'd use offending.
How do I explain my stance without offending his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
(Native German Speaker)
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
It's not entirely clear what you mean by bad—it can be taken in many different ways. It could be an insult, a criticism, a social faux pas, and so on.
But I can think of a general word to use that would cover almost all meanings of bad:
How do I explain my stance without upsetting his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
You can be upset in any number of ways—from mild displeasure or annoyance all the way to insult and anger.
As for stance, I would say that it means viewpoint or belief here. (It could be equated with one sense of position, but that word has other senses that don't make it quite as relevant.)
Stance is perfectly understandable in this sentence.
I don't think "upsetting" is quite the meaning the OP wanted to convey. Saying bad things about someone is "disparaging" them; upsetting them is a possible consequence of disparaging them, but it's not the same thing.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:08
@MichaelKay But how do you know what the question intended to convey? It's not clear. You can upset someone because you've called them a name—or because you've spilled a secret. Both of those things are bad things to say in a particular context. Don't say that. That would not be good. It would be bad. The original question didn't defined bad in any way at all. So, any meaning that we ascribe to it is simply an assumption.
– Jason Bassford
Aug 24 at 23:42
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
You may be thinking of impugning, it has an archaic meaning "to assault with words".
3
I think this is a good suggestion. Your answer could use a little more explanation though. How would "impugning" fit into the example sentence? What is the modern meaning?
– ColleenV♦
Aug 24 at 17:10
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Try diplomatic (adjective) or diplomatically (adverb).
diplomatic
- Exhibiting diplomacy; exercising tact or courtesy; using discussion to avoid hard feelings, fights or arguments.
Used like this:
How do I explain my stance diplomatically?
Isn't it a bit too formal for a family issue?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 20:15
1
One does not need to be a diplomat to be diplomatic. Indeed, I have heard it used among people's friends or family.
– Dr Sheldon
Aug 25 at 0:11
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I'd say that you want to do it "without badmouthing his family".
Here's a definition of the verb "badmouth":
to say bad things about (someone or something) : to criticize (someone or something)
MW
The word is slightly informal and can be either written as a single word or hyphenated ("bad-mouth").
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f177224%2fwhat-is-the-word-that-means-not-saying-anything-bad-in-any-way-about-someone%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
Because your question asks for a term that means the opposite of "infringing" or "disparaging", the word I would recommend is "tact."
tact
a keen sense of what to do or say in order to maintain good relations with others or avoid offense
The peace talks required great tact on the part of both leaders.
The word "tact" is often used in the form of an adjective ("tactful") or an adverb ("tactfully"). One might also say that something must be said "with tact." The sentence you provided could then become:
How do I explain my stance with tact, so that I do not offend his family or put myself in an awkward position with him?
The reconstruction of my sentence that you made with the words tact and offend is perfect. That's why I chose this answer as the best one.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 15:50
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
Because your question asks for a term that means the opposite of "infringing" or "disparaging", the word I would recommend is "tact."
tact
a keen sense of what to do or say in order to maintain good relations with others or avoid offense
The peace talks required great tact on the part of both leaders.
The word "tact" is often used in the form of an adjective ("tactful") or an adverb ("tactfully"). One might also say that something must be said "with tact." The sentence you provided could then become:
How do I explain my stance with tact, so that I do not offend his family or put myself in an awkward position with him?
The reconstruction of my sentence that you made with the words tact and offend is perfect. That's why I chose this answer as the best one.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 15:50
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
Because your question asks for a term that means the opposite of "infringing" or "disparaging", the word I would recommend is "tact."
tact
a keen sense of what to do or say in order to maintain good relations with others or avoid offense
The peace talks required great tact on the part of both leaders.
The word "tact" is often used in the form of an adjective ("tactful") or an adverb ("tactfully"). One might also say that something must be said "with tact." The sentence you provided could then become:
How do I explain my stance with tact, so that I do not offend his family or put myself in an awkward position with him?
Because your question asks for a term that means the opposite of "infringing" or "disparaging", the word I would recommend is "tact."
tact
a keen sense of what to do or say in order to maintain good relations with others or avoid offense
The peace talks required great tact on the part of both leaders.
The word "tact" is often used in the form of an adjective ("tactful") or an adverb ("tactfully"). One might also say that something must be said "with tact." The sentence you provided could then become:
How do I explain my stance with tact, so that I do not offend his family or put myself in an awkward position with him?
answered Aug 24 at 13:29
tuespetre
54428
54428
The reconstruction of my sentence that you made with the words tact and offend is perfect. That's why I chose this answer as the best one.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 15:50
add a comment |
The reconstruction of my sentence that you made with the words tact and offend is perfect. That's why I chose this answer as the best one.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 15:50
The reconstruction of my sentence that you made with the words tact and offend is perfect. That's why I chose this answer as the best one.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 15:50
The reconstruction of my sentence that you made with the words tact and offend is perfect. That's why I chose this answer as the best one.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 15:50
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
It should be infringing and it’s not clear to me what it could mean in this example. Your usage of stance seems correct here.
You could consider disparaging:
disparage
transitive verb
If you disparage someone or something, you speak about them in a way which shows that you do not have a good opinion of them.
[formal]
...Larkin's tendency to disparage literature.
(Collins Dictionary)
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
It should be infringing and it’s not clear to me what it could mean in this example. Your usage of stance seems correct here.
You could consider disparaging:
disparage
transitive verb
If you disparage someone or something, you speak about them in a way which shows that you do not have a good opinion of them.
[formal]
...Larkin's tendency to disparage literature.
(Collins Dictionary)
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
up vote
13
down vote
It should be infringing and it’s not clear to me what it could mean in this example. Your usage of stance seems correct here.
You could consider disparaging:
disparage
transitive verb
If you disparage someone or something, you speak about them in a way which shows that you do not have a good opinion of them.
[formal]
...Larkin's tendency to disparage literature.
(Collins Dictionary)
It should be infringing and it’s not clear to me what it could mean in this example. Your usage of stance seems correct here.
You could consider disparaging:
disparage
transitive verb
If you disparage someone or something, you speak about them in a way which shows that you do not have a good opinion of them.
[formal]
...Larkin's tendency to disparage literature.
(Collins Dictionary)
answered Aug 24 at 7:50
Em.♦
37.8k10110126
37.8k10110126
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
If the context is that you're trying not to say something bad about the family, you could possibly use casting apsersions?
cast aspersions
to say harsh critical things about someone or someone's character
[formal]
...He tried to discuss his political opponents respectfully, without casting aspersions.
(Merriam-Webster Dictionary)
So in your case, that would be
How do I explain my stance without casting aspersions on his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
If I write that expression in my story, would the native English readers understand it? Or should I clarify what cast aspersions means because it is rare as I last checked?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 13:21
2
it might be rare but it isn't obsolete, do not be afraid of expanding your or others vocabulary, with good words. if we only ever use words 100% of our audience understand we will end up writing peter and jane stories, as nobody will ever learn any new words. (mylearningkid.net/product/…)
– WendyG
Aug 24 at 13:56
1
I went with the Merriam-Webster definition as I wasn't sure how common the usage is elsewhere, but in Ireland and the UK it wouldn't be that rare.
– Mick O'Hea
Aug 24 at 15:04
2
Cast aspersions is very good here. It is very used across all varieties of English. It is not rare. It is an idiomatic expression.
– Lambie
Aug 24 at 20:22
I think "disparaging" is closer to the meaning the OP wants to convey. To my mind "casting aspersions" is not directly saying something bad about someone, rather it is hinting that there might be bad things that could be said.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:04
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
If the context is that you're trying not to say something bad about the family, you could possibly use casting apsersions?
cast aspersions
to say harsh critical things about someone or someone's character
[formal]
...He tried to discuss his political opponents respectfully, without casting aspersions.
(Merriam-Webster Dictionary)
So in your case, that would be
How do I explain my stance without casting aspersions on his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
If I write that expression in my story, would the native English readers understand it? Or should I clarify what cast aspersions means because it is rare as I last checked?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 13:21
2
it might be rare but it isn't obsolete, do not be afraid of expanding your or others vocabulary, with good words. if we only ever use words 100% of our audience understand we will end up writing peter and jane stories, as nobody will ever learn any new words. (mylearningkid.net/product/…)
– WendyG
Aug 24 at 13:56
1
I went with the Merriam-Webster definition as I wasn't sure how common the usage is elsewhere, but in Ireland and the UK it wouldn't be that rare.
– Mick O'Hea
Aug 24 at 15:04
2
Cast aspersions is very good here. It is very used across all varieties of English. It is not rare. It is an idiomatic expression.
– Lambie
Aug 24 at 20:22
I think "disparaging" is closer to the meaning the OP wants to convey. To my mind "casting aspersions" is not directly saying something bad about someone, rather it is hinting that there might be bad things that could be said.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:04
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
If the context is that you're trying not to say something bad about the family, you could possibly use casting apsersions?
cast aspersions
to say harsh critical things about someone or someone's character
[formal]
...He tried to discuss his political opponents respectfully, without casting aspersions.
(Merriam-Webster Dictionary)
So in your case, that would be
How do I explain my stance without casting aspersions on his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
If the context is that you're trying not to say something bad about the family, you could possibly use casting apsersions?
cast aspersions
to say harsh critical things about someone or someone's character
[formal]
...He tried to discuss his political opponents respectfully, without casting aspersions.
(Merriam-Webster Dictionary)
So in your case, that would be
How do I explain my stance without casting aspersions on his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
answered Aug 24 at 12:25
Mick O'Hea
20114
20114
If I write that expression in my story, would the native English readers understand it? Or should I clarify what cast aspersions means because it is rare as I last checked?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 13:21
2
it might be rare but it isn't obsolete, do not be afraid of expanding your or others vocabulary, with good words. if we only ever use words 100% of our audience understand we will end up writing peter and jane stories, as nobody will ever learn any new words. (mylearningkid.net/product/…)
– WendyG
Aug 24 at 13:56
1
I went with the Merriam-Webster definition as I wasn't sure how common the usage is elsewhere, but in Ireland and the UK it wouldn't be that rare.
– Mick O'Hea
Aug 24 at 15:04
2
Cast aspersions is very good here. It is very used across all varieties of English. It is not rare. It is an idiomatic expression.
– Lambie
Aug 24 at 20:22
I think "disparaging" is closer to the meaning the OP wants to convey. To my mind "casting aspersions" is not directly saying something bad about someone, rather it is hinting that there might be bad things that could be said.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:04
add a comment |
If I write that expression in my story, would the native English readers understand it? Or should I clarify what cast aspersions means because it is rare as I last checked?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 13:21
2
it might be rare but it isn't obsolete, do not be afraid of expanding your or others vocabulary, with good words. if we only ever use words 100% of our audience understand we will end up writing peter and jane stories, as nobody will ever learn any new words. (mylearningkid.net/product/…)
– WendyG
Aug 24 at 13:56
1
I went with the Merriam-Webster definition as I wasn't sure how common the usage is elsewhere, but in Ireland and the UK it wouldn't be that rare.
– Mick O'Hea
Aug 24 at 15:04
2
Cast aspersions is very good here. It is very used across all varieties of English. It is not rare. It is an idiomatic expression.
– Lambie
Aug 24 at 20:22
I think "disparaging" is closer to the meaning the OP wants to convey. To my mind "casting aspersions" is not directly saying something bad about someone, rather it is hinting that there might be bad things that could be said.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:04
If I write that expression in my story, would the native English readers understand it? Or should I clarify what cast aspersions means because it is rare as I last checked?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 13:21
If I write that expression in my story, would the native English readers understand it? Or should I clarify what cast aspersions means because it is rare as I last checked?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 13:21
2
2
it might be rare but it isn't obsolete, do not be afraid of expanding your or others vocabulary, with good words. if we only ever use words 100% of our audience understand we will end up writing peter and jane stories, as nobody will ever learn any new words. (mylearningkid.net/product/…)
– WendyG
Aug 24 at 13:56
it might be rare but it isn't obsolete, do not be afraid of expanding your or others vocabulary, with good words. if we only ever use words 100% of our audience understand we will end up writing peter and jane stories, as nobody will ever learn any new words. (mylearningkid.net/product/…)
– WendyG
Aug 24 at 13:56
1
1
I went with the Merriam-Webster definition as I wasn't sure how common the usage is elsewhere, but in Ireland and the UK it wouldn't be that rare.
– Mick O'Hea
Aug 24 at 15:04
I went with the Merriam-Webster definition as I wasn't sure how common the usage is elsewhere, but in Ireland and the UK it wouldn't be that rare.
– Mick O'Hea
Aug 24 at 15:04
2
2
Cast aspersions is very good here. It is very used across all varieties of English. It is not rare. It is an idiomatic expression.
– Lambie
Aug 24 at 20:22
Cast aspersions is very good here. It is very used across all varieties of English. It is not rare. It is an idiomatic expression.
– Lambie
Aug 24 at 20:22
I think "disparaging" is closer to the meaning the OP wants to convey. To my mind "casting aspersions" is not directly saying something bad about someone, rather it is hinting that there might be bad things that could be said.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:04
I think "disparaging" is closer to the meaning the OP wants to convey. To my mind "casting aspersions" is not directly saying something bad about someone, rather it is hinting that there might be bad things that could be said.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:04
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
In my opinion, you can both use stance and position.
Instead of infringement (which should be without infringing
in your sentence, by the way) I'd use offending.
How do I explain my stance without offending his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
(Native German Speaker)
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
In my opinion, you can both use stance and position.
Instead of infringement (which should be without infringing
in your sentence, by the way) I'd use offending.
How do I explain my stance without offending his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
(Native German Speaker)
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
In my opinion, you can both use stance and position.
Instead of infringement (which should be without infringing
in your sentence, by the way) I'd use offending.
How do I explain my stance without offending his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
(Native German Speaker)
In my opinion, you can both use stance and position.
Instead of infringement (which should be without infringing
in your sentence, by the way) I'd use offending.
How do I explain my stance without offending his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
(Native German Speaker)
edited Aug 24 at 7:54
J.R.♦
97.5k8126243
97.5k8126243
answered Aug 24 at 7:36
Bernhard
2174
2174
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
It's not entirely clear what you mean by bad—it can be taken in many different ways. It could be an insult, a criticism, a social faux pas, and so on.
But I can think of a general word to use that would cover almost all meanings of bad:
How do I explain my stance without upsetting his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
You can be upset in any number of ways—from mild displeasure or annoyance all the way to insult and anger.
As for stance, I would say that it means viewpoint or belief here. (It could be equated with one sense of position, but that word has other senses that don't make it quite as relevant.)
Stance is perfectly understandable in this sentence.
I don't think "upsetting" is quite the meaning the OP wanted to convey. Saying bad things about someone is "disparaging" them; upsetting them is a possible consequence of disparaging them, but it's not the same thing.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:08
@MichaelKay But how do you know what the question intended to convey? It's not clear. You can upset someone because you've called them a name—or because you've spilled a secret. Both of those things are bad things to say in a particular context. Don't say that. That would not be good. It would be bad. The original question didn't defined bad in any way at all. So, any meaning that we ascribe to it is simply an assumption.
– Jason Bassford
Aug 24 at 23:42
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
It's not entirely clear what you mean by bad—it can be taken in many different ways. It could be an insult, a criticism, a social faux pas, and so on.
But I can think of a general word to use that would cover almost all meanings of bad:
How do I explain my stance without upsetting his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
You can be upset in any number of ways—from mild displeasure or annoyance all the way to insult and anger.
As for stance, I would say that it means viewpoint or belief here. (It could be equated with one sense of position, but that word has other senses that don't make it quite as relevant.)
Stance is perfectly understandable in this sentence.
I don't think "upsetting" is quite the meaning the OP wanted to convey. Saying bad things about someone is "disparaging" them; upsetting them is a possible consequence of disparaging them, but it's not the same thing.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:08
@MichaelKay But how do you know what the question intended to convey? It's not clear. You can upset someone because you've called them a name—or because you've spilled a secret. Both of those things are bad things to say in a particular context. Don't say that. That would not be good. It would be bad. The original question didn't defined bad in any way at all. So, any meaning that we ascribe to it is simply an assumption.
– Jason Bassford
Aug 24 at 23:42
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
It's not entirely clear what you mean by bad—it can be taken in many different ways. It could be an insult, a criticism, a social faux pas, and so on.
But I can think of a general word to use that would cover almost all meanings of bad:
How do I explain my stance without upsetting his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
You can be upset in any number of ways—from mild displeasure or annoyance all the way to insult and anger.
As for stance, I would say that it means viewpoint or belief here. (It could be equated with one sense of position, but that word has other senses that don't make it quite as relevant.)
Stance is perfectly understandable in this sentence.
It's not entirely clear what you mean by bad—it can be taken in many different ways. It could be an insult, a criticism, a social faux pas, and so on.
But I can think of a general word to use that would cover almost all meanings of bad:
How do I explain my stance without upsetting his family and without putting myself in an awkward position in front of him?
You can be upset in any number of ways—from mild displeasure or annoyance all the way to insult and anger.
As for stance, I would say that it means viewpoint or belief here. (It could be equated with one sense of position, but that word has other senses that don't make it quite as relevant.)
Stance is perfectly understandable in this sentence.
answered Aug 24 at 7:47
Jason Bassford
11.9k22032
11.9k22032
I don't think "upsetting" is quite the meaning the OP wanted to convey. Saying bad things about someone is "disparaging" them; upsetting them is a possible consequence of disparaging them, but it's not the same thing.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:08
@MichaelKay But how do you know what the question intended to convey? It's not clear. You can upset someone because you've called them a name—or because you've spilled a secret. Both of those things are bad things to say in a particular context. Don't say that. That would not be good. It would be bad. The original question didn't defined bad in any way at all. So, any meaning that we ascribe to it is simply an assumption.
– Jason Bassford
Aug 24 at 23:42
add a comment |
I don't think "upsetting" is quite the meaning the OP wanted to convey. Saying bad things about someone is "disparaging" them; upsetting them is a possible consequence of disparaging them, but it's not the same thing.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:08
@MichaelKay But how do you know what the question intended to convey? It's not clear. You can upset someone because you've called them a name—or because you've spilled a secret. Both of those things are bad things to say in a particular context. Don't say that. That would not be good. It would be bad. The original question didn't defined bad in any way at all. So, any meaning that we ascribe to it is simply an assumption.
– Jason Bassford
Aug 24 at 23:42
I don't think "upsetting" is quite the meaning the OP wanted to convey. Saying bad things about someone is "disparaging" them; upsetting them is a possible consequence of disparaging them, but it's not the same thing.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:08
I don't think "upsetting" is quite the meaning the OP wanted to convey. Saying bad things about someone is "disparaging" them; upsetting them is a possible consequence of disparaging them, but it's not the same thing.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:08
@MichaelKay But how do you know what the question intended to convey? It's not clear. You can upset someone because you've called them a name—or because you've spilled a secret. Both of those things are bad things to say in a particular context. Don't say that. That would not be good. It would be bad. The original question didn't defined bad in any way at all. So, any meaning that we ascribe to it is simply an assumption.
– Jason Bassford
Aug 24 at 23:42
@MichaelKay But how do you know what the question intended to convey? It's not clear. You can upset someone because you've called them a name—or because you've spilled a secret. Both of those things are bad things to say in a particular context. Don't say that. That would not be good. It would be bad. The original question didn't defined bad in any way at all. So, any meaning that we ascribe to it is simply an assumption.
– Jason Bassford
Aug 24 at 23:42
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
You may be thinking of impugning, it has an archaic meaning "to assault with words".
3
I think this is a good suggestion. Your answer could use a little more explanation though. How would "impugning" fit into the example sentence? What is the modern meaning?
– ColleenV♦
Aug 24 at 17:10
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
You may be thinking of impugning, it has an archaic meaning "to assault with words".
3
I think this is a good suggestion. Your answer could use a little more explanation though. How would "impugning" fit into the example sentence? What is the modern meaning?
– ColleenV♦
Aug 24 at 17:10
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
You may be thinking of impugning, it has an archaic meaning "to assault with words".
You may be thinking of impugning, it has an archaic meaning "to assault with words".
answered Aug 24 at 14:59
nobdy
611
611
3
I think this is a good suggestion. Your answer could use a little more explanation though. How would "impugning" fit into the example sentence? What is the modern meaning?
– ColleenV♦
Aug 24 at 17:10
add a comment |
3
I think this is a good suggestion. Your answer could use a little more explanation though. How would "impugning" fit into the example sentence? What is the modern meaning?
– ColleenV♦
Aug 24 at 17:10
3
3
I think this is a good suggestion. Your answer could use a little more explanation though. How would "impugning" fit into the example sentence? What is the modern meaning?
– ColleenV♦
Aug 24 at 17:10
I think this is a good suggestion. Your answer could use a little more explanation though. How would "impugning" fit into the example sentence? What is the modern meaning?
– ColleenV♦
Aug 24 at 17:10
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Try diplomatic (adjective) or diplomatically (adverb).
diplomatic
- Exhibiting diplomacy; exercising tact or courtesy; using discussion to avoid hard feelings, fights or arguments.
Used like this:
How do I explain my stance diplomatically?
Isn't it a bit too formal for a family issue?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 20:15
1
One does not need to be a diplomat to be diplomatic. Indeed, I have heard it used among people's friends or family.
– Dr Sheldon
Aug 25 at 0:11
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Try diplomatic (adjective) or diplomatically (adverb).
diplomatic
- Exhibiting diplomacy; exercising tact or courtesy; using discussion to avoid hard feelings, fights or arguments.
Used like this:
How do I explain my stance diplomatically?
Isn't it a bit too formal for a family issue?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 20:15
1
One does not need to be a diplomat to be diplomatic. Indeed, I have heard it used among people's friends or family.
– Dr Sheldon
Aug 25 at 0:11
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Try diplomatic (adjective) or diplomatically (adverb).
diplomatic
- Exhibiting diplomacy; exercising tact or courtesy; using discussion to avoid hard feelings, fights or arguments.
Used like this:
How do I explain my stance diplomatically?
Try diplomatic (adjective) or diplomatically (adverb).
diplomatic
- Exhibiting diplomacy; exercising tact or courtesy; using discussion to avoid hard feelings, fights or arguments.
Used like this:
How do I explain my stance diplomatically?
answered Aug 24 at 20:12
Dr Sheldon
1314
1314
Isn't it a bit too formal for a family issue?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 20:15
1
One does not need to be a diplomat to be diplomatic. Indeed, I have heard it used among people's friends or family.
– Dr Sheldon
Aug 25 at 0:11
add a comment |
Isn't it a bit too formal for a family issue?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 20:15
1
One does not need to be a diplomat to be diplomatic. Indeed, I have heard it used among people's friends or family.
– Dr Sheldon
Aug 25 at 0:11
Isn't it a bit too formal for a family issue?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 20:15
Isn't it a bit too formal for a family issue?
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 24 at 20:15
1
1
One does not need to be a diplomat to be diplomatic. Indeed, I have heard it used among people's friends or family.
– Dr Sheldon
Aug 25 at 0:11
One does not need to be a diplomat to be diplomatic. Indeed, I have heard it used among people's friends or family.
– Dr Sheldon
Aug 25 at 0:11
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I'd say that you want to do it "without badmouthing his family".
Here's a definition of the verb "badmouth":
to say bad things about (someone or something) : to criticize (someone or something)
MW
The word is slightly informal and can be either written as a single word or hyphenated ("bad-mouth").
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I'd say that you want to do it "without badmouthing his family".
Here's a definition of the verb "badmouth":
to say bad things about (someone or something) : to criticize (someone or something)
MW
The word is slightly informal and can be either written as a single word or hyphenated ("bad-mouth").
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I'd say that you want to do it "without badmouthing his family".
Here's a definition of the verb "badmouth":
to say bad things about (someone or something) : to criticize (someone or something)
MW
The word is slightly informal and can be either written as a single word or hyphenated ("bad-mouth").
I'd say that you want to do it "without badmouthing his family".
Here's a definition of the verb "badmouth":
to say bad things about (someone or something) : to criticize (someone or something)
MW
The word is slightly informal and can be either written as a single word or hyphenated ("bad-mouth").
answered Aug 25 at 22:27
Laurel
4,65811127
4,65811127
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f177224%2fwhat-is-the-word-that-means-not-saying-anything-bad-in-any-way-about-someone%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
Using "infringement" here isn't 'exaggerating things a bit', it's just wrong. It doesn't fit in the sentence grammatically and it doesn't have the meaning you suggest.
– Michael Kay
Aug 24 at 23:01
@MichaelKay Consider it infringing, so it would be grammatically correct.
– Tasneem Zh
Aug 25 at 8:08
1
@TasneemZh in·fringe (v) - actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
– Sinjai
Aug 25 at 18:38
1
The sentence construction just doesn’t sound natural, regardless of the word you choose. Perhaps you want something like “without insulting...” or “without impugning his family’s pride/honor.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:37
1
@MichaelKay You can certainly infringe upon someone, in the sense of “to encroach.”
– CodeGnome
Aug 26 at 3:39