US visa granted before VWP. Will I need a US visa now?









up vote
9
down vote

favorite












I'm an ex-pat British Citizen living in New Zealand. Many years ago (c1987), before the days of the Visa Waiver Program, I went to New York for a short business trip (about 10 days), and was granted an indefinite visa.



I've never had reason to go back, and obviously, in thirty years my passport has expired and been renewed several times. I'm not sure I could find the one with the visa in now.



I may need to visit the US for family reasons sometime in the next year. It'll only be a short visit - 2-3 weeks - and I'll be returning home to New Zealand, either direct, or via the UK.



Based on a sketchy understanding of US immigration rules, if I've had a visa before, I'll need one again. However, as a UK citizen I would otherwise qualify for visa-free entry.



Should I try and get my visa reissued for my current passport? Should I apply for a new one? Or, given that the VWP didn't exist when my visa was granted, can I now just turn up and enter under the VWP?



I should probably stress that there are no complexities here. My original visit went exactly as planned, and my proposed visit is just to visit family - a holiday.










share|improve this question























  • A related question about visas and ESTA was asked a couple of days earlier: travel.stackexchange.com/q/93409/19400
    – phoog
    May 19 '17 at 1:44















up vote
9
down vote

favorite












I'm an ex-pat British Citizen living in New Zealand. Many years ago (c1987), before the days of the Visa Waiver Program, I went to New York for a short business trip (about 10 days), and was granted an indefinite visa.



I've never had reason to go back, and obviously, in thirty years my passport has expired and been renewed several times. I'm not sure I could find the one with the visa in now.



I may need to visit the US for family reasons sometime in the next year. It'll only be a short visit - 2-3 weeks - and I'll be returning home to New Zealand, either direct, or via the UK.



Based on a sketchy understanding of US immigration rules, if I've had a visa before, I'll need one again. However, as a UK citizen I would otherwise qualify for visa-free entry.



Should I try and get my visa reissued for my current passport? Should I apply for a new one? Or, given that the VWP didn't exist when my visa was granted, can I now just turn up and enter under the VWP?



I should probably stress that there are no complexities here. My original visit went exactly as planned, and my proposed visit is just to visit family - a holiday.










share|improve this question























  • A related question about visas and ESTA was asked a couple of days earlier: travel.stackexchange.com/q/93409/19400
    – phoog
    May 19 '17 at 1:44













up vote
9
down vote

favorite









up vote
9
down vote

favorite











I'm an ex-pat British Citizen living in New Zealand. Many years ago (c1987), before the days of the Visa Waiver Program, I went to New York for a short business trip (about 10 days), and was granted an indefinite visa.



I've never had reason to go back, and obviously, in thirty years my passport has expired and been renewed several times. I'm not sure I could find the one with the visa in now.



I may need to visit the US for family reasons sometime in the next year. It'll only be a short visit - 2-3 weeks - and I'll be returning home to New Zealand, either direct, or via the UK.



Based on a sketchy understanding of US immigration rules, if I've had a visa before, I'll need one again. However, as a UK citizen I would otherwise qualify for visa-free entry.



Should I try and get my visa reissued for my current passport? Should I apply for a new one? Or, given that the VWP didn't exist when my visa was granted, can I now just turn up and enter under the VWP?



I should probably stress that there are no complexities here. My original visit went exactly as planned, and my proposed visit is just to visit family - a holiday.










share|improve this question















I'm an ex-pat British Citizen living in New Zealand. Many years ago (c1987), before the days of the Visa Waiver Program, I went to New York for a short business trip (about 10 days), and was granted an indefinite visa.



I've never had reason to go back, and obviously, in thirty years my passport has expired and been renewed several times. I'm not sure I could find the one with the visa in now.



I may need to visit the US for family reasons sometime in the next year. It'll only be a short visit - 2-3 weeks - and I'll be returning home to New Zealand, either direct, or via the UK.



Based on a sketchy understanding of US immigration rules, if I've had a visa before, I'll need one again. However, as a UK citizen I would otherwise qualify for visa-free entry.



Should I try and get my visa reissued for my current passport? Should I apply for a new one? Or, given that the VWP didn't exist when my visa was granted, can I now just turn up and enter under the VWP?



I should probably stress that there are no complexities here. My original visit went exactly as planned, and my proposed visit is just to visit family - a holiday.







visas usa us-visa-waiver-program visa-free-entry






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 19 '17 at 1:01









Crazydre

51k992224




51k992224










asked May 19 '17 at 1:00









Airsick

462




462











  • A related question about visas and ESTA was asked a couple of days earlier: travel.stackexchange.com/q/93409/19400
    – phoog
    May 19 '17 at 1:44

















  • A related question about visas and ESTA was asked a couple of days earlier: travel.stackexchange.com/q/93409/19400
    – phoog
    May 19 '17 at 1:44
















A related question about visas and ESTA was asked a couple of days earlier: travel.stackexchange.com/q/93409/19400
– phoog
May 19 '17 at 1:44





A related question about visas and ESTA was asked a couple of days earlier: travel.stackexchange.com/q/93409/19400
– phoog
May 19 '17 at 1:44











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
14
down vote













A prior visa does not disqualify you from using the VWP.



Among the eligibility requirements for the VWP, you must not have been removed from the US, and you must not have overstayed any previous VWP admission. 8 USC 1187(a)(7):




(7) No previous violation



If the alien previously was admitted without a visa under this section, the alien must not have failed to comply with the conditions of any previous admission as such a nonimmigrant.




8 CFR 217.2, Eligibility, section (b)(2):




(2) Persons previously removed as deportable aliens. Aliens who have been deported or removed from the United States, after having been determined deportable, require the consent of the Attorney General to apply for admission to the United States pursuant to section 212(a)(9)(A)(iii) of the Act. Such persons may not be admitted to the United States under the provisions of this part notwithstanding the fact that the required consent of the Attorney General may have been secured. Such aliens must secure a visa in order to be admitted to the United States as nonimmigrants, unless otherwise exempt.




Don't forget to get ESTA authorization, make sure you get it from a .gov website, and enjoy your visit.




As an aside, even if you could find your old indefinite-validity visa, it would not help. From the State Department's page About Visas - The Basics:




What are indefinite validity visas (Burroughs visas) and are they still valid?



Indefinite validity visas (Burroughs Visas) are tourist/business visas manually stamped into a traveler’s passport which were valid for ten years. Effective April 1, 2004, all indefinite validity Burroughs visas became void. Therefore, if you have an indefinite validity visa you must apply for a new visa for travel to the U.S.




Now I'm certainly unable to reconcile "indefinite validity" with "which were valid for ten years," but the next sentence is unambiguous: that visa has been invalid since April 2004.



(Edit: the ten-year validity period was applied to these indefinite-validity visas retroactively by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations.)



I also would not read too much into the statement that "if you have an indefinite validity visa you must apply for a new visa for travel to the U.S." I am certain that the writer simply didn't consider the fact that the VWP would also allow such a person to travel to the US. But if you're uncertain about taking my word for this, you can get in touch with CBP yourself. If you do so, please come back and post an answer to your own question.






share|improve this answer


















  • 5




    I would assume the part about Burroughs visas is meant to say something like: "Indefinite validity visas were valid (only) for the passport they are stamped into. Passports which are valid for ten years. The last time Indefinite validity visas were issued was April 1, 1994. Because of this, the last Indefinite validity visa expired when 10 years passed after the last one was issued". But this is only speculation.
    – ontrack
    May 19 '17 at 8:08











  • Thanks for the prompt and comprehensive response, @phoog. I agree that the wording in the references is ambiguous, but given the potential for problems, and that there is no urgency I'll follow up with the CBP people on the link you've kindly provided.
    – Airsick
    May 20 '17 at 5:31










  • @ontrack it seems that they weren't in fact limited to the passport they were stamped into, but rather at some point they were given a ten-year validity period by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the switch to visa "foils" (stickers). The last such visas were issued before April 1, 1994, so in fact most of those visas became invalid before that date.
    – phoog
    May 24 '17 at 19:27

















up vote
3
down vote













I was originally born in Hungary and have recently obtained Canadian citizenship. Hungary "recently" (2008) became visa free and I personally know a lot of people (including my brother and mother) who travelled with just an ESTA who had a visa previously -- which everyone needed before.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "273"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f93561%2fus-visa-granted-before-vwp-will-i-need-a-us-visa-now%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    14
    down vote













    A prior visa does not disqualify you from using the VWP.



    Among the eligibility requirements for the VWP, you must not have been removed from the US, and you must not have overstayed any previous VWP admission. 8 USC 1187(a)(7):




    (7) No previous violation



    If the alien previously was admitted without a visa under this section, the alien must not have failed to comply with the conditions of any previous admission as such a nonimmigrant.




    8 CFR 217.2, Eligibility, section (b)(2):




    (2) Persons previously removed as deportable aliens. Aliens who have been deported or removed from the United States, after having been determined deportable, require the consent of the Attorney General to apply for admission to the United States pursuant to section 212(a)(9)(A)(iii) of the Act. Such persons may not be admitted to the United States under the provisions of this part notwithstanding the fact that the required consent of the Attorney General may have been secured. Such aliens must secure a visa in order to be admitted to the United States as nonimmigrants, unless otherwise exempt.




    Don't forget to get ESTA authorization, make sure you get it from a .gov website, and enjoy your visit.




    As an aside, even if you could find your old indefinite-validity visa, it would not help. From the State Department's page About Visas - The Basics:




    What are indefinite validity visas (Burroughs visas) and are they still valid?



    Indefinite validity visas (Burroughs Visas) are tourist/business visas manually stamped into a traveler’s passport which were valid for ten years. Effective April 1, 2004, all indefinite validity Burroughs visas became void. Therefore, if you have an indefinite validity visa you must apply for a new visa for travel to the U.S.




    Now I'm certainly unable to reconcile "indefinite validity" with "which were valid for ten years," but the next sentence is unambiguous: that visa has been invalid since April 2004.



    (Edit: the ten-year validity period was applied to these indefinite-validity visas retroactively by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations.)



    I also would not read too much into the statement that "if you have an indefinite validity visa you must apply for a new visa for travel to the U.S." I am certain that the writer simply didn't consider the fact that the VWP would also allow such a person to travel to the US. But if you're uncertain about taking my word for this, you can get in touch with CBP yourself. If you do so, please come back and post an answer to your own question.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 5




      I would assume the part about Burroughs visas is meant to say something like: "Indefinite validity visas were valid (only) for the passport they are stamped into. Passports which are valid for ten years. The last time Indefinite validity visas were issued was April 1, 1994. Because of this, the last Indefinite validity visa expired when 10 years passed after the last one was issued". But this is only speculation.
      – ontrack
      May 19 '17 at 8:08











    • Thanks for the prompt and comprehensive response, @phoog. I agree that the wording in the references is ambiguous, but given the potential for problems, and that there is no urgency I'll follow up with the CBP people on the link you've kindly provided.
      – Airsick
      May 20 '17 at 5:31










    • @ontrack it seems that they weren't in fact limited to the passport they were stamped into, but rather at some point they were given a ten-year validity period by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the switch to visa "foils" (stickers). The last such visas were issued before April 1, 1994, so in fact most of those visas became invalid before that date.
      – phoog
      May 24 '17 at 19:27














    up vote
    14
    down vote













    A prior visa does not disqualify you from using the VWP.



    Among the eligibility requirements for the VWP, you must not have been removed from the US, and you must not have overstayed any previous VWP admission. 8 USC 1187(a)(7):




    (7) No previous violation



    If the alien previously was admitted without a visa under this section, the alien must not have failed to comply with the conditions of any previous admission as such a nonimmigrant.




    8 CFR 217.2, Eligibility, section (b)(2):




    (2) Persons previously removed as deportable aliens. Aliens who have been deported or removed from the United States, after having been determined deportable, require the consent of the Attorney General to apply for admission to the United States pursuant to section 212(a)(9)(A)(iii) of the Act. Such persons may not be admitted to the United States under the provisions of this part notwithstanding the fact that the required consent of the Attorney General may have been secured. Such aliens must secure a visa in order to be admitted to the United States as nonimmigrants, unless otherwise exempt.




    Don't forget to get ESTA authorization, make sure you get it from a .gov website, and enjoy your visit.




    As an aside, even if you could find your old indefinite-validity visa, it would not help. From the State Department's page About Visas - The Basics:




    What are indefinite validity visas (Burroughs visas) and are they still valid?



    Indefinite validity visas (Burroughs Visas) are tourist/business visas manually stamped into a traveler’s passport which were valid for ten years. Effective April 1, 2004, all indefinite validity Burroughs visas became void. Therefore, if you have an indefinite validity visa you must apply for a new visa for travel to the U.S.




    Now I'm certainly unable to reconcile "indefinite validity" with "which were valid for ten years," but the next sentence is unambiguous: that visa has been invalid since April 2004.



    (Edit: the ten-year validity period was applied to these indefinite-validity visas retroactively by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations.)



    I also would not read too much into the statement that "if you have an indefinite validity visa you must apply for a new visa for travel to the U.S." I am certain that the writer simply didn't consider the fact that the VWP would also allow such a person to travel to the US. But if you're uncertain about taking my word for this, you can get in touch with CBP yourself. If you do so, please come back and post an answer to your own question.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 5




      I would assume the part about Burroughs visas is meant to say something like: "Indefinite validity visas were valid (only) for the passport they are stamped into. Passports which are valid for ten years. The last time Indefinite validity visas were issued was April 1, 1994. Because of this, the last Indefinite validity visa expired when 10 years passed after the last one was issued". But this is only speculation.
      – ontrack
      May 19 '17 at 8:08











    • Thanks for the prompt and comprehensive response, @phoog. I agree that the wording in the references is ambiguous, but given the potential for problems, and that there is no urgency I'll follow up with the CBP people on the link you've kindly provided.
      – Airsick
      May 20 '17 at 5:31










    • @ontrack it seems that they weren't in fact limited to the passport they were stamped into, but rather at some point they were given a ten-year validity period by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the switch to visa "foils" (stickers). The last such visas were issued before April 1, 1994, so in fact most of those visas became invalid before that date.
      – phoog
      May 24 '17 at 19:27












    up vote
    14
    down vote










    up vote
    14
    down vote









    A prior visa does not disqualify you from using the VWP.



    Among the eligibility requirements for the VWP, you must not have been removed from the US, and you must not have overstayed any previous VWP admission. 8 USC 1187(a)(7):




    (7) No previous violation



    If the alien previously was admitted without a visa under this section, the alien must not have failed to comply with the conditions of any previous admission as such a nonimmigrant.




    8 CFR 217.2, Eligibility, section (b)(2):




    (2) Persons previously removed as deportable aliens. Aliens who have been deported or removed from the United States, after having been determined deportable, require the consent of the Attorney General to apply for admission to the United States pursuant to section 212(a)(9)(A)(iii) of the Act. Such persons may not be admitted to the United States under the provisions of this part notwithstanding the fact that the required consent of the Attorney General may have been secured. Such aliens must secure a visa in order to be admitted to the United States as nonimmigrants, unless otherwise exempt.




    Don't forget to get ESTA authorization, make sure you get it from a .gov website, and enjoy your visit.




    As an aside, even if you could find your old indefinite-validity visa, it would not help. From the State Department's page About Visas - The Basics:




    What are indefinite validity visas (Burroughs visas) and are they still valid?



    Indefinite validity visas (Burroughs Visas) are tourist/business visas manually stamped into a traveler’s passport which were valid for ten years. Effective April 1, 2004, all indefinite validity Burroughs visas became void. Therefore, if you have an indefinite validity visa you must apply for a new visa for travel to the U.S.




    Now I'm certainly unable to reconcile "indefinite validity" with "which were valid for ten years," but the next sentence is unambiguous: that visa has been invalid since April 2004.



    (Edit: the ten-year validity period was applied to these indefinite-validity visas retroactively by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations.)



    I also would not read too much into the statement that "if you have an indefinite validity visa you must apply for a new visa for travel to the U.S." I am certain that the writer simply didn't consider the fact that the VWP would also allow such a person to travel to the US. But if you're uncertain about taking my word for this, you can get in touch with CBP yourself. If you do so, please come back and post an answer to your own question.






    share|improve this answer














    A prior visa does not disqualify you from using the VWP.



    Among the eligibility requirements for the VWP, you must not have been removed from the US, and you must not have overstayed any previous VWP admission. 8 USC 1187(a)(7):




    (7) No previous violation



    If the alien previously was admitted without a visa under this section, the alien must not have failed to comply with the conditions of any previous admission as such a nonimmigrant.




    8 CFR 217.2, Eligibility, section (b)(2):




    (2) Persons previously removed as deportable aliens. Aliens who have been deported or removed from the United States, after having been determined deportable, require the consent of the Attorney General to apply for admission to the United States pursuant to section 212(a)(9)(A)(iii) of the Act. Such persons may not be admitted to the United States under the provisions of this part notwithstanding the fact that the required consent of the Attorney General may have been secured. Such aliens must secure a visa in order to be admitted to the United States as nonimmigrants, unless otherwise exempt.




    Don't forget to get ESTA authorization, make sure you get it from a .gov website, and enjoy your visit.




    As an aside, even if you could find your old indefinite-validity visa, it would not help. From the State Department's page About Visas - The Basics:




    What are indefinite validity visas (Burroughs visas) and are they still valid?



    Indefinite validity visas (Burroughs Visas) are tourist/business visas manually stamped into a traveler’s passport which were valid for ten years. Effective April 1, 2004, all indefinite validity Burroughs visas became void. Therefore, if you have an indefinite validity visa you must apply for a new visa for travel to the U.S.




    Now I'm certainly unable to reconcile "indefinite validity" with "which were valid for ten years," but the next sentence is unambiguous: that visa has been invalid since April 2004.



    (Edit: the ten-year validity period was applied to these indefinite-validity visas retroactively by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations.)



    I also would not read too much into the statement that "if you have an indefinite validity visa you must apply for a new visa for travel to the U.S." I am certain that the writer simply didn't consider the fact that the VWP would also allow such a person to travel to the US. But if you're uncertain about taking my word for this, you can get in touch with CBP yourself. If you do so, please come back and post an answer to your own question.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 24 '17 at 19:28

























    answered May 19 '17 at 1:12









    phoog

    67.5k10147215




    67.5k10147215







    • 5




      I would assume the part about Burroughs visas is meant to say something like: "Indefinite validity visas were valid (only) for the passport they are stamped into. Passports which are valid for ten years. The last time Indefinite validity visas were issued was April 1, 1994. Because of this, the last Indefinite validity visa expired when 10 years passed after the last one was issued". But this is only speculation.
      – ontrack
      May 19 '17 at 8:08











    • Thanks for the prompt and comprehensive response, @phoog. I agree that the wording in the references is ambiguous, but given the potential for problems, and that there is no urgency I'll follow up with the CBP people on the link you've kindly provided.
      – Airsick
      May 20 '17 at 5:31










    • @ontrack it seems that they weren't in fact limited to the passport they were stamped into, but rather at some point they were given a ten-year validity period by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the switch to visa "foils" (stickers). The last such visas were issued before April 1, 1994, so in fact most of those visas became invalid before that date.
      – phoog
      May 24 '17 at 19:27












    • 5




      I would assume the part about Burroughs visas is meant to say something like: "Indefinite validity visas were valid (only) for the passport they are stamped into. Passports which are valid for ten years. The last time Indefinite validity visas were issued was April 1, 1994. Because of this, the last Indefinite validity visa expired when 10 years passed after the last one was issued". But this is only speculation.
      – ontrack
      May 19 '17 at 8:08











    • Thanks for the prompt and comprehensive response, @phoog. I agree that the wording in the references is ambiguous, but given the potential for problems, and that there is no urgency I'll follow up with the CBP people on the link you've kindly provided.
      – Airsick
      May 20 '17 at 5:31










    • @ontrack it seems that they weren't in fact limited to the passport they were stamped into, but rather at some point they were given a ten-year validity period by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the switch to visa "foils" (stickers). The last such visas were issued before April 1, 1994, so in fact most of those visas became invalid before that date.
      – phoog
      May 24 '17 at 19:27







    5




    5




    I would assume the part about Burroughs visas is meant to say something like: "Indefinite validity visas were valid (only) for the passport they are stamped into. Passports which are valid for ten years. The last time Indefinite validity visas were issued was April 1, 1994. Because of this, the last Indefinite validity visa expired when 10 years passed after the last one was issued". But this is only speculation.
    – ontrack
    May 19 '17 at 8:08





    I would assume the part about Burroughs visas is meant to say something like: "Indefinite validity visas were valid (only) for the passport they are stamped into. Passports which are valid for ten years. The last time Indefinite validity visas were issued was April 1, 1994. Because of this, the last Indefinite validity visa expired when 10 years passed after the last one was issued". But this is only speculation.
    – ontrack
    May 19 '17 at 8:08













    Thanks for the prompt and comprehensive response, @phoog. I agree that the wording in the references is ambiguous, but given the potential for problems, and that there is no urgency I'll follow up with the CBP people on the link you've kindly provided.
    – Airsick
    May 20 '17 at 5:31




    Thanks for the prompt and comprehensive response, @phoog. I agree that the wording in the references is ambiguous, but given the potential for problems, and that there is no urgency I'll follow up with the CBP people on the link you've kindly provided.
    – Airsick
    May 20 '17 at 5:31












    @ontrack it seems that they weren't in fact limited to the passport they were stamped into, but rather at some point they were given a ten-year validity period by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the switch to visa "foils" (stickers). The last such visas were issued before April 1, 1994, so in fact most of those visas became invalid before that date.
    – phoog
    May 24 '17 at 19:27




    @ontrack it seems that they weren't in fact limited to the passport they were stamped into, but rather at some point they were given a ten-year validity period by a change in the Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the switch to visa "foils" (stickers). The last such visas were issued before April 1, 1994, so in fact most of those visas became invalid before that date.
    – phoog
    May 24 '17 at 19:27












    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I was originally born in Hungary and have recently obtained Canadian citizenship. Hungary "recently" (2008) became visa free and I personally know a lot of people (including my brother and mother) who travelled with just an ESTA who had a visa previously -- which everyone needed before.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      I was originally born in Hungary and have recently obtained Canadian citizenship. Hungary "recently" (2008) became visa free and I personally know a lot of people (including my brother and mother) who travelled with just an ESTA who had a visa previously -- which everyone needed before.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        I was originally born in Hungary and have recently obtained Canadian citizenship. Hungary "recently" (2008) became visa free and I personally know a lot of people (including my brother and mother) who travelled with just an ESTA who had a visa previously -- which everyone needed before.






        share|improve this answer














        I was originally born in Hungary and have recently obtained Canadian citizenship. Hungary "recently" (2008) became visa free and I personally know a lot of people (including my brother and mother) who travelled with just an ESTA who had a visa previously -- which everyone needed before.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 19 '17 at 13:42









        JoErNanO

        43.8k12135223




        43.8k12135223










        answered May 19 '17 at 5:46









        chx

        36.9k376183




        36.9k376183



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f93561%2fus-visa-granted-before-vwp-will-i-need-a-us-visa-now%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            Crossroads (UK TV series)

            ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế