How do I alter this code to allow abstract classes or interfaces to work over identical auto generated classes?









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Explanation



I use the xsd.exe tool to generate a class API based upon an XSD (defines a schema for XML files) from which to interact with XML files.



This tool works well, but this issue is that I have a few schemas which are by-and-large identical with small tweaks, so I want to create interfaces or abstract classes that allow me to reuse code elsewhere.



In my example below I've simplified the generated code for purposes of sharing it here but the principle still holds.



Example Non-Functioning Code



Program.cs



public static void Main()

BaseColor baseColor = new Color1 ColorDescription = "Red" ;
BaseShape baseShape = new Shape1 Content = baseColor ;



Models.cs



//Auto generated models - I have no control over these but they are partial classes

//First set of autogenerated models, normally in its own file
public partial class Shape1

public Color1 Content get; set;


public partial class Color1


public string ColorDescription get; set;


//Second set of autogenerated models, normally in its own file
public partial class Shape2

public Color2 Content get; set;


public partial class Color2


public string ColorDescription get; set;


//Attemping to abstract these classes so I can generically use them regardless of underlying type
public abstract class BaseShape

public abstract BaseColor Content get; set;


public abstract class BaseColor

public abstract string ColorDescription get; set;


//Attempting to extend the autogenerated classes with the abstract classes
public partial class Shape1 : BaseShape

public partial class Color1 : BaseColor

public partial class Shape2 : BaseShape

public partial class Color2 : BaseColor


Errors



This error is repeated 8 times in total for both shapes, both colors and both get/set methods.



'Shape1' does not implement inherited abstract member 'BaseShape.Content.set' XmlSerializeChild


And from the Main method.



Cannot implicitly convert type 'XmlSerializeChild.Models.BaseColor' to 'XmlSerializeChild.Models.Color1'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?)









share|improve this question





















  • You cant change the types when overriding also you will need the override keyword, you are going to have to rethink this
    – TheGeneral
    2 days ago











  • Any thoughts on a different approach? The only constraint that I have is that I can't modify the auto-generated files.
    – Geesh_SO
    2 days ago














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Explanation



I use the xsd.exe tool to generate a class API based upon an XSD (defines a schema for XML files) from which to interact with XML files.



This tool works well, but this issue is that I have a few schemas which are by-and-large identical with small tweaks, so I want to create interfaces or abstract classes that allow me to reuse code elsewhere.



In my example below I've simplified the generated code for purposes of sharing it here but the principle still holds.



Example Non-Functioning Code



Program.cs



public static void Main()

BaseColor baseColor = new Color1 ColorDescription = "Red" ;
BaseShape baseShape = new Shape1 Content = baseColor ;



Models.cs



//Auto generated models - I have no control over these but they are partial classes

//First set of autogenerated models, normally in its own file
public partial class Shape1

public Color1 Content get; set;


public partial class Color1


public string ColorDescription get; set;


//Second set of autogenerated models, normally in its own file
public partial class Shape2

public Color2 Content get; set;


public partial class Color2


public string ColorDescription get; set;


//Attemping to abstract these classes so I can generically use them regardless of underlying type
public abstract class BaseShape

public abstract BaseColor Content get; set;


public abstract class BaseColor

public abstract string ColorDescription get; set;


//Attempting to extend the autogenerated classes with the abstract classes
public partial class Shape1 : BaseShape

public partial class Color1 : BaseColor

public partial class Shape2 : BaseShape

public partial class Color2 : BaseColor


Errors



This error is repeated 8 times in total for both shapes, both colors and both get/set methods.



'Shape1' does not implement inherited abstract member 'BaseShape.Content.set' XmlSerializeChild


And from the Main method.



Cannot implicitly convert type 'XmlSerializeChild.Models.BaseColor' to 'XmlSerializeChild.Models.Color1'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?)









share|improve this question





















  • You cant change the types when overriding also you will need the override keyword, you are going to have to rethink this
    – TheGeneral
    2 days ago











  • Any thoughts on a different approach? The only constraint that I have is that I can't modify the auto-generated files.
    – Geesh_SO
    2 days ago












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Explanation



I use the xsd.exe tool to generate a class API based upon an XSD (defines a schema for XML files) from which to interact with XML files.



This tool works well, but this issue is that I have a few schemas which are by-and-large identical with small tweaks, so I want to create interfaces or abstract classes that allow me to reuse code elsewhere.



In my example below I've simplified the generated code for purposes of sharing it here but the principle still holds.



Example Non-Functioning Code



Program.cs



public static void Main()

BaseColor baseColor = new Color1 ColorDescription = "Red" ;
BaseShape baseShape = new Shape1 Content = baseColor ;



Models.cs



//Auto generated models - I have no control over these but they are partial classes

//First set of autogenerated models, normally in its own file
public partial class Shape1

public Color1 Content get; set;


public partial class Color1


public string ColorDescription get; set;


//Second set of autogenerated models, normally in its own file
public partial class Shape2

public Color2 Content get; set;


public partial class Color2


public string ColorDescription get; set;


//Attemping to abstract these classes so I can generically use them regardless of underlying type
public abstract class BaseShape

public abstract BaseColor Content get; set;


public abstract class BaseColor

public abstract string ColorDescription get; set;


//Attempting to extend the autogenerated classes with the abstract classes
public partial class Shape1 : BaseShape

public partial class Color1 : BaseColor

public partial class Shape2 : BaseShape

public partial class Color2 : BaseColor


Errors



This error is repeated 8 times in total for both shapes, both colors and both get/set methods.



'Shape1' does not implement inherited abstract member 'BaseShape.Content.set' XmlSerializeChild


And from the Main method.



Cannot implicitly convert type 'XmlSerializeChild.Models.BaseColor' to 'XmlSerializeChild.Models.Color1'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?)









share|improve this question













Explanation



I use the xsd.exe tool to generate a class API based upon an XSD (defines a schema for XML files) from which to interact with XML files.



This tool works well, but this issue is that I have a few schemas which are by-and-large identical with small tweaks, so I want to create interfaces or abstract classes that allow me to reuse code elsewhere.



In my example below I've simplified the generated code for purposes of sharing it here but the principle still holds.



Example Non-Functioning Code



Program.cs



public static void Main()

BaseColor baseColor = new Color1 ColorDescription = "Red" ;
BaseShape baseShape = new Shape1 Content = baseColor ;



Models.cs



//Auto generated models - I have no control over these but they are partial classes

//First set of autogenerated models, normally in its own file
public partial class Shape1

public Color1 Content get; set;


public partial class Color1


public string ColorDescription get; set;


//Second set of autogenerated models, normally in its own file
public partial class Shape2

public Color2 Content get; set;


public partial class Color2


public string ColorDescription get; set;


//Attemping to abstract these classes so I can generically use them regardless of underlying type
public abstract class BaseShape

public abstract BaseColor Content get; set;


public abstract class BaseColor

public abstract string ColorDescription get; set;


//Attempting to extend the autogenerated classes with the abstract classes
public partial class Shape1 : BaseShape

public partial class Color1 : BaseColor

public partial class Shape2 : BaseShape

public partial class Color2 : BaseColor


Errors



This error is repeated 8 times in total for both shapes, both colors and both get/set methods.



'Shape1' does not implement inherited abstract member 'BaseShape.Content.set' XmlSerializeChild


And from the Main method.



Cannot implicitly convert type 'XmlSerializeChild.Models.BaseColor' to 'XmlSerializeChild.Models.Color1'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?)






c# oop inheritance interface abstract-class






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









Geesh_SO

52021136




52021136











  • You cant change the types when overriding also you will need the override keyword, you are going to have to rethink this
    – TheGeneral
    2 days ago











  • Any thoughts on a different approach? The only constraint that I have is that I can't modify the auto-generated files.
    – Geesh_SO
    2 days ago
















  • You cant change the types when overriding also you will need the override keyword, you are going to have to rethink this
    – TheGeneral
    2 days ago











  • Any thoughts on a different approach? The only constraint that I have is that I can't modify the auto-generated files.
    – Geesh_SO
    2 days ago















You cant change the types when overriding also you will need the override keyword, you are going to have to rethink this
– TheGeneral
2 days ago





You cant change the types when overriding also you will need the override keyword, you are going to have to rethink this
– TheGeneral
2 days ago













Any thoughts on a different approach? The only constraint that I have is that I can't modify the auto-generated files.
– Geesh_SO
2 days ago




Any thoughts on a different approach? The only constraint that I have is that I can't modify the auto-generated files.
– Geesh_SO
2 days ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










You where quite close, but as TheGeneral wrote in his comment, you can't change the type of the property when overriding it.



What you can do is introduce a new property (I've chosen to use interfaces but it will work just as well with abstract classes) that will be used in the code, having the explicit cast in each partial class:



So first, I've created the interfaces:



public interface IColor string ColorDescription get; set; 

public interface IShape IColor BaseContent get; set;


Then, added the IColor implementation to the Color1 and Color2 classes:



public partial class Color1 : IColor 
public partial class Color2 : IColor


(That was the easy part since the ColorDescription is the same type for both colors).



Next, I've added the IShape implementation to the Shape1 and Shape2 classes:



public partial class Shape1 : IShape 

public IColor BaseContent

get return Content;
set Content = (Color1) value;



public partial class Shape2 : IShape

public IColor BaseContent

get return Content;
set Content = (Color2) value;




Now, in the Main method, you can do this:



var baseColor = new Color1() ColorDescription = "Red" ;
var baseShape = new Shape1() BaseContent = baseColor ;


Another option instead of introducing a new property would be to implicitly implement the IShape interface - but this would be more cumbersome and will not allow you to use the new Shape1() Content = baseColor syntax. Still, let's review this option as well:



So we rename the BaseContent property in the IShape interface:



interface IShape IColor Content get; set; 


And we implement it like this:



public partial class Shape1 : IShape 

IColor IShape.Content

get return ((Shape1)this).Content;
set ((Shape1)this).Content = (Color1) value;



public partial class Shape2 : IShape

IColor IShape.Content

get return ((Shape2)this).Content;
set ((Shape2)this).Content = (Color2) value;




Then, we create our reverences like this:



var baseColor = new Color1() ColorDescription = "Red" ;
// Note: Do not use var here - you need the reference to be of type `IShape`!
IShape baseShape = new Shape1();
baseShape.Content = baseColor;





share|improve this answer






















  • argggg you beat me, upvote, also with less mucking about
    – TheGeneral
    2 days ago











  • @TheGeneral You win some you lose some...
    – Zohar Peled
    2 days ago










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53206140%2fhow-do-i-alter-this-code-to-allow-abstract-classes-or-interfaces-to-work-over-id%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










You where quite close, but as TheGeneral wrote in his comment, you can't change the type of the property when overriding it.



What you can do is introduce a new property (I've chosen to use interfaces but it will work just as well with abstract classes) that will be used in the code, having the explicit cast in each partial class:



So first, I've created the interfaces:



public interface IColor string ColorDescription get; set; 

public interface IShape IColor BaseContent get; set;


Then, added the IColor implementation to the Color1 and Color2 classes:



public partial class Color1 : IColor 
public partial class Color2 : IColor


(That was the easy part since the ColorDescription is the same type for both colors).



Next, I've added the IShape implementation to the Shape1 and Shape2 classes:



public partial class Shape1 : IShape 

public IColor BaseContent

get return Content;
set Content = (Color1) value;



public partial class Shape2 : IShape

public IColor BaseContent

get return Content;
set Content = (Color2) value;




Now, in the Main method, you can do this:



var baseColor = new Color1() ColorDescription = "Red" ;
var baseShape = new Shape1() BaseContent = baseColor ;


Another option instead of introducing a new property would be to implicitly implement the IShape interface - but this would be more cumbersome and will not allow you to use the new Shape1() Content = baseColor syntax. Still, let's review this option as well:



So we rename the BaseContent property in the IShape interface:



interface IShape IColor Content get; set; 


And we implement it like this:



public partial class Shape1 : IShape 

IColor IShape.Content

get return ((Shape1)this).Content;
set ((Shape1)this).Content = (Color1) value;



public partial class Shape2 : IShape

IColor IShape.Content

get return ((Shape2)this).Content;
set ((Shape2)this).Content = (Color2) value;




Then, we create our reverences like this:



var baseColor = new Color1() ColorDescription = "Red" ;
// Note: Do not use var here - you need the reference to be of type `IShape`!
IShape baseShape = new Shape1();
baseShape.Content = baseColor;





share|improve this answer






















  • argggg you beat me, upvote, also with less mucking about
    – TheGeneral
    2 days ago











  • @TheGeneral You win some you lose some...
    – Zohar Peled
    2 days ago














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










You where quite close, but as TheGeneral wrote in his comment, you can't change the type of the property when overriding it.



What you can do is introduce a new property (I've chosen to use interfaces but it will work just as well with abstract classes) that will be used in the code, having the explicit cast in each partial class:



So first, I've created the interfaces:



public interface IColor string ColorDescription get; set; 

public interface IShape IColor BaseContent get; set;


Then, added the IColor implementation to the Color1 and Color2 classes:



public partial class Color1 : IColor 
public partial class Color2 : IColor


(That was the easy part since the ColorDescription is the same type for both colors).



Next, I've added the IShape implementation to the Shape1 and Shape2 classes:



public partial class Shape1 : IShape 

public IColor BaseContent

get return Content;
set Content = (Color1) value;



public partial class Shape2 : IShape

public IColor BaseContent

get return Content;
set Content = (Color2) value;




Now, in the Main method, you can do this:



var baseColor = new Color1() ColorDescription = "Red" ;
var baseShape = new Shape1() BaseContent = baseColor ;


Another option instead of introducing a new property would be to implicitly implement the IShape interface - but this would be more cumbersome and will not allow you to use the new Shape1() Content = baseColor syntax. Still, let's review this option as well:



So we rename the BaseContent property in the IShape interface:



interface IShape IColor Content get; set; 


And we implement it like this:



public partial class Shape1 : IShape 

IColor IShape.Content

get return ((Shape1)this).Content;
set ((Shape1)this).Content = (Color1) value;



public partial class Shape2 : IShape

IColor IShape.Content

get return ((Shape2)this).Content;
set ((Shape2)this).Content = (Color2) value;




Then, we create our reverences like this:



var baseColor = new Color1() ColorDescription = "Red" ;
// Note: Do not use var here - you need the reference to be of type `IShape`!
IShape baseShape = new Shape1();
baseShape.Content = baseColor;





share|improve this answer






















  • argggg you beat me, upvote, also with less mucking about
    – TheGeneral
    2 days ago











  • @TheGeneral You win some you lose some...
    – Zohar Peled
    2 days ago












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






You where quite close, but as TheGeneral wrote in his comment, you can't change the type of the property when overriding it.



What you can do is introduce a new property (I've chosen to use interfaces but it will work just as well with abstract classes) that will be used in the code, having the explicit cast in each partial class:



So first, I've created the interfaces:



public interface IColor string ColorDescription get; set; 

public interface IShape IColor BaseContent get; set;


Then, added the IColor implementation to the Color1 and Color2 classes:



public partial class Color1 : IColor 
public partial class Color2 : IColor


(That was the easy part since the ColorDescription is the same type for both colors).



Next, I've added the IShape implementation to the Shape1 and Shape2 classes:



public partial class Shape1 : IShape 

public IColor BaseContent

get return Content;
set Content = (Color1) value;



public partial class Shape2 : IShape

public IColor BaseContent

get return Content;
set Content = (Color2) value;




Now, in the Main method, you can do this:



var baseColor = new Color1() ColorDescription = "Red" ;
var baseShape = new Shape1() BaseContent = baseColor ;


Another option instead of introducing a new property would be to implicitly implement the IShape interface - but this would be more cumbersome and will not allow you to use the new Shape1() Content = baseColor syntax. Still, let's review this option as well:



So we rename the BaseContent property in the IShape interface:



interface IShape IColor Content get; set; 


And we implement it like this:



public partial class Shape1 : IShape 

IColor IShape.Content

get return ((Shape1)this).Content;
set ((Shape1)this).Content = (Color1) value;



public partial class Shape2 : IShape

IColor IShape.Content

get return ((Shape2)this).Content;
set ((Shape2)this).Content = (Color2) value;




Then, we create our reverences like this:



var baseColor = new Color1() ColorDescription = "Red" ;
// Note: Do not use var here - you need the reference to be of type `IShape`!
IShape baseShape = new Shape1();
baseShape.Content = baseColor;





share|improve this answer














You where quite close, but as TheGeneral wrote in his comment, you can't change the type of the property when overriding it.



What you can do is introduce a new property (I've chosen to use interfaces but it will work just as well with abstract classes) that will be used in the code, having the explicit cast in each partial class:



So first, I've created the interfaces:



public interface IColor string ColorDescription get; set; 

public interface IShape IColor BaseContent get; set;


Then, added the IColor implementation to the Color1 and Color2 classes:



public partial class Color1 : IColor 
public partial class Color2 : IColor


(That was the easy part since the ColorDescription is the same type for both colors).



Next, I've added the IShape implementation to the Shape1 and Shape2 classes:



public partial class Shape1 : IShape 

public IColor BaseContent

get return Content;
set Content = (Color1) value;



public partial class Shape2 : IShape

public IColor BaseContent

get return Content;
set Content = (Color2) value;




Now, in the Main method, you can do this:



var baseColor = new Color1() ColorDescription = "Red" ;
var baseShape = new Shape1() BaseContent = baseColor ;


Another option instead of introducing a new property would be to implicitly implement the IShape interface - but this would be more cumbersome and will not allow you to use the new Shape1() Content = baseColor syntax. Still, let's review this option as well:



So we rename the BaseContent property in the IShape interface:



interface IShape IColor Content get; set; 


And we implement it like this:



public partial class Shape1 : IShape 

IColor IShape.Content

get return ((Shape1)this).Content;
set ((Shape1)this).Content = (Color1) value;



public partial class Shape2 : IShape

IColor IShape.Content

get return ((Shape2)this).Content;
set ((Shape2)this).Content = (Color2) value;




Then, we create our reverences like this:



var baseColor = new Color1() ColorDescription = "Red" ;
// Note: Do not use var here - you need the reference to be of type `IShape`!
IShape baseShape = new Shape1();
baseShape.Content = baseColor;






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









Zohar Peled

50.3k73070




50.3k73070











  • argggg you beat me, upvote, also with less mucking about
    – TheGeneral
    2 days ago











  • @TheGeneral You win some you lose some...
    – Zohar Peled
    2 days ago
















  • argggg you beat me, upvote, also with less mucking about
    – TheGeneral
    2 days ago











  • @TheGeneral You win some you lose some...
    – Zohar Peled
    2 days ago















argggg you beat me, upvote, also with less mucking about
– TheGeneral
2 days ago





argggg you beat me, upvote, also with less mucking about
– TheGeneral
2 days ago













@TheGeneral You win some you lose some...
– Zohar Peled
2 days ago




@TheGeneral You win some you lose some...
– Zohar Peled
2 days ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53206140%2fhow-do-i-alter-this-code-to-allow-abstract-classes-or-interfaces-to-work-over-id%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest














































































Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Crossroads (UK TV series)

ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế