Using Subquery to annotate a Count

Using Subquery to annotate a Count



Please help me I've been stuck on this for way too long :(



What I want to do:



I have these two models:


class Specialization(models.Model):
name = models.CharField("name", max_length=64)
class Doctor(models.Model):
name = models.CharField("name", max_length=128)
# ...
specialization = models.ForeignKey(Specialization)



I would like to annotate all specializations in a queryset with the number of doctors that have this specialization.



My Solution so Far:



I went through a loop and I made a simple: Doctor.objects.filter(specialization=spec).count() however this proved to be too slow and inefficient.
The more I've read the more I realized that it would make sense to use a SubQuery here to filter the doctors for the OuterRef specialization. This is what I came up with:


Doctor.objects.filter(specialization=spec).count()


SubQuery


OuterRef


doctors = Doctor.objects.all().filter(specialization=OuterRef("id"))
.values("specialization_id")
.order_by()
add_doctors_count = doctors.annotate(cnt=Count("specialization_id")).values("cnt")[:1]

spec_qs_with_counts = Specialization.objects.all().annotate(
num_applicable_doctors=Subquery(add_doctors_count, output_field=IntegerField())
)



The output I get is just 1 for every speciality. The code just annotates every doctor object with its specialization_id and then annotates the count within that group, meaning it will be 1.


specialization_id



This doesn't make complete sense to me unfortunately. In my initial attempt I used an aggregate for the count, and while it works on its own it doesn't work as a SubQuery, I get this error:


SubQuery



This queryset contains a reference to an outer query and may only be used in a subquery.


This queryset contains a reference to an outer query and may only be used in a subquery.



I posted this question before and someone suggested doing Specialization.objects.annotate(count=Count("doctor"))


Specialization.objects.annotate(count=Count("doctor"))



However this doesn't work because I need to count a specific queryset of Doctors.



I've followed these links



However, I'm not getting the same result:



https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/ref/models/expressions/



https://medium.com/@hansonkd/the-dramatic-benefits-of-django-subqueries-and-annotations-4195e0dafb16



Django 1.11 Annotating a Subquery Aggregate



If you have any questions that would make this clearer please tell me.





I think you misunderatnd the semantics of Count('doctor'): it counts the related doctors, so that means per specialization, you will get a (possibly) different number. It does not count all doctors, and annotates all specializations with that number.
– Willem Van Onsem
Aug 26 at 15:47


Count('doctor')


doctor




1 Answer
1



Counting all Doctors per Specialization


Doctor


Specialization



I think you make things overly complicated, probably because you think that Count('doctor') will count every doctor per specialization (regardless the specialization of that doctor). It does not, if you Count such related object, Django implicitly looks for related objects. In fact you can not Count('unrelated_model') at all, it is only through relations (reversed included) like a ForeignKey, ManyToManyField, etc. that you can query these, since otherwise these are not very sensical.


Count('doctor')


Count


Count('unrelated_model')


ForeignKey


ManyToManyField



I would like to annotate all specializations in a queryset with the number of doctors that have this specialization.



You can do this with a simple:


# Counting all doctors per specialization (so not all doctors in general)

from django.db.models import Count

Specialization.objects.annotate(
num_doctors=Count('doctor')
)



Now every Specialization object in this queryset will have an extra attribute num_doctors that is an integer (the number of doctors with that specialization).


Specialization


num_doctors



You can also filter on the Specializations in the same query (for example only obtain specializations that end on 'my'). As long as you do not filter on the related doctors set, the Count will work (see section below how to do this).


Specialization


'my'


doctor


Count



If you however filter on the related doctors, then the related counts will filter out these doctors. Furthermore if you filter on another related object, then this will result in an extra JOIN, that will act as a multiplier for the Counts. In that case it might be better to use num_doctors=Count('doctor', distinct=True) instead. You can always use the distinct=True (regardless if you do extra JOINs or not), but it will have a small performance impact.


doctor


JOIN


Count


num_doctors=Count('doctor', distinct=True)


distinct=True


JOIN



The above works because Count('doctor') does not simply adds all doctors to the query, it makes a LEFT OUTER JOIN on the doctors table, and thus checks that the specialization_id of that Doctor is exactly the one we are looking for. So the query Django will construct looks like:


Count('doctor')


LEFT OUTER JOIN


doctor


specialization_id


Doctor


SELECT specialization.*
COUNT(doctor.id) AS num_doctors
FROM specialization
LEFT OUTER JOIN doctor ON doctor.specialization_id = specialization.id
GROUP BY specialization.id



Doing the same with a subquery will functionally get the same results, but if the Django ORM and the database management system do not find a way to optimize this, this can result in an expensive query, since for every specialization, it then can result in an extra subquery in the database.



Counting specific Doctors per Specialization


Doctor


Specialization



Say however you want to count only doctors that have a name that starts with Joe, then you can add a filter on the related doctor, like:


doctor


# counting all Doctors with as name Joe per specialization

from django.db.models import Count

Specialization.objects.filter(
doctor__name__startswith='Joe' # sample filter
).annotate(
num_doctors=Count('doctor')
)





Thanks for the reply, I appreciate it. I just tried this and initially thought this wasn't going to work, but it did! You're right I was overcomplicating this, I just thought the count for the doctors is going to count ALL the doctors for that Specialization, but the filter actually takes them out of the count. Thanks for the help.
– Ysrninja
Aug 26 at 16:14






By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Edmonton

Crossroads (UK TV series)