Python iterating through pair of values in list for function

Python iterating through pair of values in list for function



I have a list like


cases = [(1,1), (2,2), (3,3)]



trying to write a function that calculates through each item and return values:


def case_cal(cases)
for x, y in cases:
result = x+y
return result

output = case_cal(cases)
print(output)



I like to get output like


2
4
6



But I only get


2



I am a newbie learning python and something simple I am missing here. Could I get any advice? Thanks in advance!





return exits the function immediately, so you only get the the result of 1+1.
– John Gordon
Aug 25 at 2:34



return




6 Answers
6



Once you return something you move out of the function. So make a list, append your values to the list and then return in the end.


def case_cal(cases):
ret_values =
for x, y in cases:
result = x+y
ret_values.append(result)
return ret_values

output = case_cal(cases)
print(*output)





Your function body could also be written return [x + y for x, y in cases].
– ggorlen
Aug 25 at 2:55



return [x + y for x, y in cases]





@ggorlen, yes, indeed. But as the OP seems to be a beginner, didn't want to confuse him with comprehensions.
– Deepak Saini
Aug 25 at 2:57





Definitely, I like this answer quite a bit.
– ggorlen
Aug 25 at 2:57





That worked, Thanks for the quick response!
– lukas
Aug 25 at 3:16



Your code returns inside the for loop, at the end of the first iteration, so you'll only see the first x + y result.


return


for


x + y



This is a perfect use for a generator, which will allow you to grab the next x + y calculation on demand and offer maximum control over what the caller can do with the result:


x + y


cases = [(1,1), (2,2), (3,3)]

def case_cal(cases):
for x, y in cases:
yield x + y

for x in case_cal(cases):
print(x)



Output:


2
4
6



And a repl to play with.





Using list comprehensions for side-effects is evil (it's a functional programming tool; true functional programming is naturally side-effect free, and people don't tend to expect side-effects in functional constructs even in multiparadigm languages). It also needlessly creates lists of None (minor performance cost, and in a repl, it means echoing out that list of None for bonus confusion). for x in case_cal(cases): print(x) is equally simple, and not willfully evil. :-)
– ShadowRanger
Aug 25 at 2:47



list


list


None


repl


list


None


for x in case_cal(cases): print(x)





I'm not sure I buy that Python has much relation to "true functional programming", but I accept the argument that it creates a list of None unnecessarily. Will adjust!
– ggorlen
Aug 25 at 2:50



None



You can simply map the items of the list to the sum function:


sum


list(map(sum, cases))



This becomes:


[2, 4, 6]



Or if you want to print the items individually:


for s in map(sum, cases):
print(s)



This outputs:


2
4
6



If you dont need the values in a list you can procced as follows:


cases = [(1,1), (2,2), (3,3)]

def case_cal(cases):
for x, y in cases:
result = x+y
print(result)

case_cal(cases)



Just directly print the values instead of returning them as once you return something you move out of the function.

Also,


cases = [(1,1), (2,2), (3,3)]

def case_cal(cases):
for x, y in cases:
print(x+y)

case_cal(cases)





Writing a function that has side effects when OP is trying to write a function with no side effects seems to avoid the problem--it's fundamentally a different function.
– ggorlen
Aug 25 at 2:42



You could do this:


cases = [(1,1), (2,2), (3,3)]

def case_cal(cases):
results =
for x, y in cases:
results.append(x + y)
return results

output = [case_cal(cases)]
print(output)



And then you could define a print function like this:


def print_cases(cases):
for elem in cases[0]:
print(elem)



But there is a more Pythonic way:


def case_cal(cases):
return [(x + y) for (x, y) in cases]



This is called a list comprehension, and you are going to be using them very often in python. You can read more about them here.





Thanks for the link on the list comprehension! Helps me to understand more about Python as I am teaching myself right now.
– lukas
Aug 27 at 5:14



Simply do the following:


def case_calc(cases):
for x, y in cases:
print(x + y)

case_calc([(1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3)])



Cheers






By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Crossroads (UK TV series)

ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế