Does New York have a higher number of people with tuberculosis?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I would like to send someone with special needs to this place, but they require that everyone be tested for tuberculosis. We have never travelled outside of the US, and we've lived in Oregon for all of our lives.
usa health new-york-city
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I would like to send someone with special needs to this place, but they require that everyone be tested for tuberculosis. We have never travelled outside of the US, and we've lived in Oregon for all of our lives.
usa health new-york-city
2
I'd imagine that this is a particular requirement to live (or volunteer) in the group home where the course is conducted. Institutional living settings are generally considered higher-risk for TB, and the nature of the program inherently involves close physical contact. Regulations often require testing for residents and employees in long-term care facilities, though I'm not sure precisely how this facility is regulated.
â Zach Lipton
Mar 13 at 6:06
2
Taco Bell? Teddy Bear? Terabyte? Trackable? Terbium?
â Neusser
Mar 13 at 10:10
1
@Neusser Tuberculosis
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:54
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I would like to send someone with special needs to this place, but they require that everyone be tested for tuberculosis. We have never travelled outside of the US, and we've lived in Oregon for all of our lives.
usa health new-york-city
I would like to send someone with special needs to this place, but they require that everyone be tested for tuberculosis. We have never travelled outside of the US, and we've lived in Oregon for all of our lives.
usa health new-york-city
edited Mar 13 at 14:24
phoog
61.1k9131191
61.1k9131191
asked Mar 13 at 5:50
HeavenlyHarmony
30512
30512
2
I'd imagine that this is a particular requirement to live (or volunteer) in the group home where the course is conducted. Institutional living settings are generally considered higher-risk for TB, and the nature of the program inherently involves close physical contact. Regulations often require testing for residents and employees in long-term care facilities, though I'm not sure precisely how this facility is regulated.
â Zach Lipton
Mar 13 at 6:06
2
Taco Bell? Teddy Bear? Terabyte? Trackable? Terbium?
â Neusser
Mar 13 at 10:10
1
@Neusser Tuberculosis
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:54
add a comment |Â
2
I'd imagine that this is a particular requirement to live (or volunteer) in the group home where the course is conducted. Institutional living settings are generally considered higher-risk for TB, and the nature of the program inherently involves close physical contact. Regulations often require testing for residents and employees in long-term care facilities, though I'm not sure precisely how this facility is regulated.
â Zach Lipton
Mar 13 at 6:06
2
Taco Bell? Teddy Bear? Terabyte? Trackable? Terbium?
â Neusser
Mar 13 at 10:10
1
@Neusser Tuberculosis
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:54
2
2
I'd imagine that this is a particular requirement to live (or volunteer) in the group home where the course is conducted. Institutional living settings are generally considered higher-risk for TB, and the nature of the program inherently involves close physical contact. Regulations often require testing for residents and employees in long-term care facilities, though I'm not sure precisely how this facility is regulated.
â Zach Lipton
Mar 13 at 6:06
I'd imagine that this is a particular requirement to live (or volunteer) in the group home where the course is conducted. Institutional living settings are generally considered higher-risk for TB, and the nature of the program inherently involves close physical contact. Regulations often require testing for residents and employees in long-term care facilities, though I'm not sure precisely how this facility is regulated.
â Zach Lipton
Mar 13 at 6:06
2
2
Taco Bell? Teddy Bear? Terabyte? Trackable? Terbium?
â Neusser
Mar 13 at 10:10
Taco Bell? Teddy Bear? Terabyte? Trackable? Terbium?
â Neusser
Mar 13 at 10:10
1
1
@Neusser Tuberculosis
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:54
@Neusser Tuberculosis
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:54
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Yes, apparently, as has one of your neighboring states, California. See https://www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/factsheets/statistics/tbtrends.htm (emphasis added):
TB was reported in all 50 states
Nine states, the District of Columbia (DC), and New York City reported incidence rates above the national average.
TB case counts were highest in California, Texas, New York (including New York City), and Florida. These four states accounted for just over half of the total cases in the United States.
2
Coincidentally, those just happen to be the four most populous states in the union. They account for almost exactly a third of the total population of the United States (data from Wikipedia). In other words, they do have above average rates of TB, but not by huge amounts.
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:57
My comment was specifically related to the last paragraph (which definitely is talking about absolute counts).
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 13:41
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Yes, apparently, as has one of your neighboring states, California. See https://www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/factsheets/statistics/tbtrends.htm (emphasis added):
TB was reported in all 50 states
Nine states, the District of Columbia (DC), and New York City reported incidence rates above the national average.
TB case counts were highest in California, Texas, New York (including New York City), and Florida. These four states accounted for just over half of the total cases in the United States.
2
Coincidentally, those just happen to be the four most populous states in the union. They account for almost exactly a third of the total population of the United States (data from Wikipedia). In other words, they do have above average rates of TB, but not by huge amounts.
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:57
My comment was specifically related to the last paragraph (which definitely is talking about absolute counts).
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 13:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
Yes, apparently, as has one of your neighboring states, California. See https://www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/factsheets/statistics/tbtrends.htm (emphasis added):
TB was reported in all 50 states
Nine states, the District of Columbia (DC), and New York City reported incidence rates above the national average.
TB case counts were highest in California, Texas, New York (including New York City), and Florida. These four states accounted for just over half of the total cases in the United States.
2
Coincidentally, those just happen to be the four most populous states in the union. They account for almost exactly a third of the total population of the United States (data from Wikipedia). In other words, they do have above average rates of TB, but not by huge amounts.
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:57
My comment was specifically related to the last paragraph (which definitely is talking about absolute counts).
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 13:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Yes, apparently, as has one of your neighboring states, California. See https://www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/factsheets/statistics/tbtrends.htm (emphasis added):
TB was reported in all 50 states
Nine states, the District of Columbia (DC), and New York City reported incidence rates above the national average.
TB case counts were highest in California, Texas, New York (including New York City), and Florida. These four states accounted for just over half of the total cases in the United States.
Yes, apparently, as has one of your neighboring states, California. See https://www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/factsheets/statistics/tbtrends.htm (emphasis added):
TB was reported in all 50 states
Nine states, the District of Columbia (DC), and New York City reported incidence rates above the national average.
TB case counts were highest in California, Texas, New York (including New York City), and Florida. These four states accounted for just over half of the total cases in the United States.
answered Mar 13 at 6:03
phoog
61.1k9131191
61.1k9131191
2
Coincidentally, those just happen to be the four most populous states in the union. They account for almost exactly a third of the total population of the United States (data from Wikipedia). In other words, they do have above average rates of TB, but not by huge amounts.
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:57
My comment was specifically related to the last paragraph (which definitely is talking about absolute counts).
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 13:41
add a comment |Â
2
Coincidentally, those just happen to be the four most populous states in the union. They account for almost exactly a third of the total population of the United States (data from Wikipedia). In other words, they do have above average rates of TB, but not by huge amounts.
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:57
My comment was specifically related to the last paragraph (which definitely is talking about absolute counts).
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 13:41
2
2
Coincidentally, those just happen to be the four most populous states in the union. They account for almost exactly a third of the total population of the United States (data from Wikipedia). In other words, they do have above average rates of TB, but not by huge amounts.
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:57
Coincidentally, those just happen to be the four most populous states in the union. They account for almost exactly a third of the total population of the United States (data from Wikipedia). In other words, they do have above average rates of TB, but not by huge amounts.
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:57
My comment was specifically related to the last paragraph (which definitely is talking about absolute counts).
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 13:41
My comment was specifically related to the last paragraph (which definitely is talking about absolute counts).
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 13:41
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111131%2fdoes-new-york-have-a-higher-number-of-people-with-tuberculosis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password

Clash Royale CLAN TAG
2
I'd imagine that this is a particular requirement to live (or volunteer) in the group home where the course is conducted. Institutional living settings are generally considered higher-risk for TB, and the nature of the program inherently involves close physical contact. Regulations often require testing for residents and employees in long-term care facilities, though I'm not sure precisely how this facility is regulated.
â Zach Lipton
Mar 13 at 6:06
2
Taco Bell? Teddy Bear? Terabyte? Trackable? Terbium?
â Neusser
Mar 13 at 10:10
1
@Neusser Tuberculosis
â Martin Bonner
Mar 13 at 12:54