Does the American government restrict the countries its citizens may travel to?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
3
down vote

favorite












This question is quite simple but at the same time quite interesting, morally. For the longest time, Americans weren't "allowed" to travel to Cuba, and yet would a dual citizen be considered guilty of a crime for traveling there on his/her other passport? What about an American/Cuban dual citizen? Does the United States restrict where its citizens are allowed to travel?







share|improve this question


























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    This question is quite simple but at the same time quite interesting, morally. For the longest time, Americans weren't "allowed" to travel to Cuba, and yet would a dual citizen be considered guilty of a crime for traveling there on his/her other passport? What about an American/Cuban dual citizen? Does the United States restrict where its citizens are allowed to travel?







    share|improve this question






















      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      This question is quite simple but at the same time quite interesting, morally. For the longest time, Americans weren't "allowed" to travel to Cuba, and yet would a dual citizen be considered guilty of a crime for traveling there on his/her other passport? What about an American/Cuban dual citizen? Does the United States restrict where its citizens are allowed to travel?







      share|improve this question












      This question is quite simple but at the same time quite interesting, morally. For the longest time, Americans weren't "allowed" to travel to Cuba, and yet would a dual citizen be considered guilty of a crime for traveling there on his/her other passport? What about an American/Cuban dual citizen? Does the United States restrict where its citizens are allowed to travel?









      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 6 at 4:45









      TheEnvironmentalist

      22715




      22715




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          The restrictions on travel to Cuba have always been rooted in sanctions in the form of a trade embargo. The US government has long restricted its citizens from spending money with certain individuals or entities abroad (see, for instance, the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917). This impacts travelers since virtually every trip will involve spending at least some money (there's an airport tax for one thing). You can see our previous question Travel to Cuba as dual citizen (USA+other)? for information on that situation.



          Starting last year, there are also travel restrictions to North Korea, which apply to US passports:




          Travel to, in, or through North Korea on a U.S. passport without this special validation may justify revocation of your passport for misuse under 22 C.F.R. § 51.62(a)(2) and may subject you to felony prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1544 or other applicable laws.




          There's a procedure to apply for a Special Validation Passport if you think you have an acceptable reason. There are also financial sanctions that apply to North Korea.



          The regulations for passports permit the Secretary of State to issue other restrictions on where US passports may be used in the case of war, armed hostilities, or imminent danger to health or safety.






          share|improve this answer




















          • What about a dual French/American citizen traveling to North Korea on a French passport, assuming no such restrictions from France?
            – TheEnvironmentalist
            Mar 6 at 12:53










          • @TheEnvironmentalist: That doesn't violate the restriction, as it is not using a US passport.
            – user102008
            Mar 6 at 21:41

















          up vote
          -1
          down vote













          The US government issues travel advisories for their citizens via the State Department, and they are listed at this website.



          Each country is ranked from 1 to 4, 4 being the most restrictive suggestion of "Do Not Travel".



          As of this writing, there are 11 countries rated 4:



          • Afghanistan

          • Central African Republic (CAR)

          • Yemen

          • Iran

          • Iraq

          • South Sudan

          • Mali

          • North Korea

          • Somalia

          • Syria

          • Libya

          US citizens have never been banned from visiting Cuba. Commercial embargoes meant that it was difficult to get flights to Cuba, but this did not prevent travel there.



          As there are no exit (immigration) controls at US borders, effectively the US cannot ban you from leaving. It is upto the receiving country to stop you from entering.



          However the State Department (well, the Secretary of State) has the right to issue restrictions on US passports in times of war, armed conflict, or if there is imminent danger to health and safety.



          In practice, this usually means you require special permissions, such as the case of North Korea:




          Individuals cannot use a U.S. passport to travel to, in, or through
          North Korea without a special validation from the Department of State.







          share|improve this answer
















          • 6




            This answer seems to conflate travel advisories which advise against travel while the original question is about US imposed restrictions which incur penalties applied by the US government.
            – Jacob Horbulyk
            Mar 6 at 6:38










          • "Us Citizens have never been banned" I see this on the department of treasury website: "Is travel to Cuba for tourist activities permitted? No. Consistent with the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSRA), travel-related transactions involving Cuba are only permitted for the 12 categories of activities identified in the CACR. Travel-related transactions for other purposes remain prohibited. "
            – djna
            Mar 6 at 11:43






          • 1




            So they are not banned, just restricted. There is a difference.
            – Burhan Khalid
            Mar 6 at 11:56










          • @djna That would seem to indicate some inconsistency within the law regarding whether or not traveling to Cuba is actually "banned", as in not allowed under penalty of imprisonment or other punishment.
            – TheEnvironmentalist
            Mar 6 at 12:55






          • 2




            @TheEnvironmentalist Travel-related transactions are restricted, rather than travel itself. As a practical matter, there isn't much of a distinction, but there's no inconsistency. And if you meet the criteria laid out in the regulations (or get a special license for some other purpose I guess), such transactions are permitted, not banned.
            – Zach Lipton
            Mar 6 at 18:44










          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "273"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110783%2fdoes-the-american-government-restrict-the-countries-its-citizens-may-travel-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          5
          down vote













          The restrictions on travel to Cuba have always been rooted in sanctions in the form of a trade embargo. The US government has long restricted its citizens from spending money with certain individuals or entities abroad (see, for instance, the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917). This impacts travelers since virtually every trip will involve spending at least some money (there's an airport tax for one thing). You can see our previous question Travel to Cuba as dual citizen (USA+other)? for information on that situation.



          Starting last year, there are also travel restrictions to North Korea, which apply to US passports:




          Travel to, in, or through North Korea on a U.S. passport without this special validation may justify revocation of your passport for misuse under 22 C.F.R. § 51.62(a)(2) and may subject you to felony prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1544 or other applicable laws.




          There's a procedure to apply for a Special Validation Passport if you think you have an acceptable reason. There are also financial sanctions that apply to North Korea.



          The regulations for passports permit the Secretary of State to issue other restrictions on where US passports may be used in the case of war, armed hostilities, or imminent danger to health or safety.






          share|improve this answer




















          • What about a dual French/American citizen traveling to North Korea on a French passport, assuming no such restrictions from France?
            – TheEnvironmentalist
            Mar 6 at 12:53










          • @TheEnvironmentalist: That doesn't violate the restriction, as it is not using a US passport.
            – user102008
            Mar 6 at 21:41














          up vote
          5
          down vote













          The restrictions on travel to Cuba have always been rooted in sanctions in the form of a trade embargo. The US government has long restricted its citizens from spending money with certain individuals or entities abroad (see, for instance, the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917). This impacts travelers since virtually every trip will involve spending at least some money (there's an airport tax for one thing). You can see our previous question Travel to Cuba as dual citizen (USA+other)? for information on that situation.



          Starting last year, there are also travel restrictions to North Korea, which apply to US passports:




          Travel to, in, or through North Korea on a U.S. passport without this special validation may justify revocation of your passport for misuse under 22 C.F.R. § 51.62(a)(2) and may subject you to felony prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1544 or other applicable laws.




          There's a procedure to apply for a Special Validation Passport if you think you have an acceptable reason. There are also financial sanctions that apply to North Korea.



          The regulations for passports permit the Secretary of State to issue other restrictions on where US passports may be used in the case of war, armed hostilities, or imminent danger to health or safety.






          share|improve this answer




















          • What about a dual French/American citizen traveling to North Korea on a French passport, assuming no such restrictions from France?
            – TheEnvironmentalist
            Mar 6 at 12:53










          • @TheEnvironmentalist: That doesn't violate the restriction, as it is not using a US passport.
            – user102008
            Mar 6 at 21:41












          up vote
          5
          down vote










          up vote
          5
          down vote









          The restrictions on travel to Cuba have always been rooted in sanctions in the form of a trade embargo. The US government has long restricted its citizens from spending money with certain individuals or entities abroad (see, for instance, the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917). This impacts travelers since virtually every trip will involve spending at least some money (there's an airport tax for one thing). You can see our previous question Travel to Cuba as dual citizen (USA+other)? for information on that situation.



          Starting last year, there are also travel restrictions to North Korea, which apply to US passports:




          Travel to, in, or through North Korea on a U.S. passport without this special validation may justify revocation of your passport for misuse under 22 C.F.R. § 51.62(a)(2) and may subject you to felony prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1544 or other applicable laws.




          There's a procedure to apply for a Special Validation Passport if you think you have an acceptable reason. There are also financial sanctions that apply to North Korea.



          The regulations for passports permit the Secretary of State to issue other restrictions on where US passports may be used in the case of war, armed hostilities, or imminent danger to health or safety.






          share|improve this answer












          The restrictions on travel to Cuba have always been rooted in sanctions in the form of a trade embargo. The US government has long restricted its citizens from spending money with certain individuals or entities abroad (see, for instance, the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917). This impacts travelers since virtually every trip will involve spending at least some money (there's an airport tax for one thing). You can see our previous question Travel to Cuba as dual citizen (USA+other)? for information on that situation.



          Starting last year, there are also travel restrictions to North Korea, which apply to US passports:




          Travel to, in, or through North Korea on a U.S. passport without this special validation may justify revocation of your passport for misuse under 22 C.F.R. § 51.62(a)(2) and may subject you to felony prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1544 or other applicable laws.




          There's a procedure to apply for a Special Validation Passport if you think you have an acceptable reason. There are also financial sanctions that apply to North Korea.



          The regulations for passports permit the Secretary of State to issue other restrictions on where US passports may be used in the case of war, armed hostilities, or imminent danger to health or safety.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 6 at 5:01









          Zach Lipton

          54.3k9162223




          54.3k9162223











          • What about a dual French/American citizen traveling to North Korea on a French passport, assuming no such restrictions from France?
            – TheEnvironmentalist
            Mar 6 at 12:53










          • @TheEnvironmentalist: That doesn't violate the restriction, as it is not using a US passport.
            – user102008
            Mar 6 at 21:41
















          • What about a dual French/American citizen traveling to North Korea on a French passport, assuming no such restrictions from France?
            – TheEnvironmentalist
            Mar 6 at 12:53










          • @TheEnvironmentalist: That doesn't violate the restriction, as it is not using a US passport.
            – user102008
            Mar 6 at 21:41















          What about a dual French/American citizen traveling to North Korea on a French passport, assuming no such restrictions from France?
          – TheEnvironmentalist
          Mar 6 at 12:53




          What about a dual French/American citizen traveling to North Korea on a French passport, assuming no such restrictions from France?
          – TheEnvironmentalist
          Mar 6 at 12:53












          @TheEnvironmentalist: That doesn't violate the restriction, as it is not using a US passport.
          – user102008
          Mar 6 at 21:41




          @TheEnvironmentalist: That doesn't violate the restriction, as it is not using a US passport.
          – user102008
          Mar 6 at 21:41












          up vote
          -1
          down vote













          The US government issues travel advisories for their citizens via the State Department, and they are listed at this website.



          Each country is ranked from 1 to 4, 4 being the most restrictive suggestion of "Do Not Travel".



          As of this writing, there are 11 countries rated 4:



          • Afghanistan

          • Central African Republic (CAR)

          • Yemen

          • Iran

          • Iraq

          • South Sudan

          • Mali

          • North Korea

          • Somalia

          • Syria

          • Libya

          US citizens have never been banned from visiting Cuba. Commercial embargoes meant that it was difficult to get flights to Cuba, but this did not prevent travel there.



          As there are no exit (immigration) controls at US borders, effectively the US cannot ban you from leaving. It is upto the receiving country to stop you from entering.



          However the State Department (well, the Secretary of State) has the right to issue restrictions on US passports in times of war, armed conflict, or if there is imminent danger to health and safety.



          In practice, this usually means you require special permissions, such as the case of North Korea:




          Individuals cannot use a U.S. passport to travel to, in, or through
          North Korea without a special validation from the Department of State.







          share|improve this answer
















          • 6




            This answer seems to conflate travel advisories which advise against travel while the original question is about US imposed restrictions which incur penalties applied by the US government.
            – Jacob Horbulyk
            Mar 6 at 6:38










          • "Us Citizens have never been banned" I see this on the department of treasury website: "Is travel to Cuba for tourist activities permitted? No. Consistent with the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSRA), travel-related transactions involving Cuba are only permitted for the 12 categories of activities identified in the CACR. Travel-related transactions for other purposes remain prohibited. "
            – djna
            Mar 6 at 11:43






          • 1




            So they are not banned, just restricted. There is a difference.
            – Burhan Khalid
            Mar 6 at 11:56










          • @djna That would seem to indicate some inconsistency within the law regarding whether or not traveling to Cuba is actually "banned", as in not allowed under penalty of imprisonment or other punishment.
            – TheEnvironmentalist
            Mar 6 at 12:55






          • 2




            @TheEnvironmentalist Travel-related transactions are restricted, rather than travel itself. As a practical matter, there isn't much of a distinction, but there's no inconsistency. And if you meet the criteria laid out in the regulations (or get a special license for some other purpose I guess), such transactions are permitted, not banned.
            – Zach Lipton
            Mar 6 at 18:44














          up vote
          -1
          down vote













          The US government issues travel advisories for their citizens via the State Department, and they are listed at this website.



          Each country is ranked from 1 to 4, 4 being the most restrictive suggestion of "Do Not Travel".



          As of this writing, there are 11 countries rated 4:



          • Afghanistan

          • Central African Republic (CAR)

          • Yemen

          • Iran

          • Iraq

          • South Sudan

          • Mali

          • North Korea

          • Somalia

          • Syria

          • Libya

          US citizens have never been banned from visiting Cuba. Commercial embargoes meant that it was difficult to get flights to Cuba, but this did not prevent travel there.



          As there are no exit (immigration) controls at US borders, effectively the US cannot ban you from leaving. It is upto the receiving country to stop you from entering.



          However the State Department (well, the Secretary of State) has the right to issue restrictions on US passports in times of war, armed conflict, or if there is imminent danger to health and safety.



          In practice, this usually means you require special permissions, such as the case of North Korea:




          Individuals cannot use a U.S. passport to travel to, in, or through
          North Korea without a special validation from the Department of State.







          share|improve this answer
















          • 6




            This answer seems to conflate travel advisories which advise against travel while the original question is about US imposed restrictions which incur penalties applied by the US government.
            – Jacob Horbulyk
            Mar 6 at 6:38










          • "Us Citizens have never been banned" I see this on the department of treasury website: "Is travel to Cuba for tourist activities permitted? No. Consistent with the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSRA), travel-related transactions involving Cuba are only permitted for the 12 categories of activities identified in the CACR. Travel-related transactions for other purposes remain prohibited. "
            – djna
            Mar 6 at 11:43






          • 1




            So they are not banned, just restricted. There is a difference.
            – Burhan Khalid
            Mar 6 at 11:56










          • @djna That would seem to indicate some inconsistency within the law regarding whether or not traveling to Cuba is actually "banned", as in not allowed under penalty of imprisonment or other punishment.
            – TheEnvironmentalist
            Mar 6 at 12:55






          • 2




            @TheEnvironmentalist Travel-related transactions are restricted, rather than travel itself. As a practical matter, there isn't much of a distinction, but there's no inconsistency. And if you meet the criteria laid out in the regulations (or get a special license for some other purpose I guess), such transactions are permitted, not banned.
            – Zach Lipton
            Mar 6 at 18:44












          up vote
          -1
          down vote










          up vote
          -1
          down vote









          The US government issues travel advisories for their citizens via the State Department, and they are listed at this website.



          Each country is ranked from 1 to 4, 4 being the most restrictive suggestion of "Do Not Travel".



          As of this writing, there are 11 countries rated 4:



          • Afghanistan

          • Central African Republic (CAR)

          • Yemen

          • Iran

          • Iraq

          • South Sudan

          • Mali

          • North Korea

          • Somalia

          • Syria

          • Libya

          US citizens have never been banned from visiting Cuba. Commercial embargoes meant that it was difficult to get flights to Cuba, but this did not prevent travel there.



          As there are no exit (immigration) controls at US borders, effectively the US cannot ban you from leaving. It is upto the receiving country to stop you from entering.



          However the State Department (well, the Secretary of State) has the right to issue restrictions on US passports in times of war, armed conflict, or if there is imminent danger to health and safety.



          In practice, this usually means you require special permissions, such as the case of North Korea:




          Individuals cannot use a U.S. passport to travel to, in, or through
          North Korea without a special validation from the Department of State.







          share|improve this answer












          The US government issues travel advisories for their citizens via the State Department, and they are listed at this website.



          Each country is ranked from 1 to 4, 4 being the most restrictive suggestion of "Do Not Travel".



          As of this writing, there are 11 countries rated 4:



          • Afghanistan

          • Central African Republic (CAR)

          • Yemen

          • Iran

          • Iraq

          • South Sudan

          • Mali

          • North Korea

          • Somalia

          • Syria

          • Libya

          US citizens have never been banned from visiting Cuba. Commercial embargoes meant that it was difficult to get flights to Cuba, but this did not prevent travel there.



          As there are no exit (immigration) controls at US borders, effectively the US cannot ban you from leaving. It is upto the receiving country to stop you from entering.



          However the State Department (well, the Secretary of State) has the right to issue restrictions on US passports in times of war, armed conflict, or if there is imminent danger to health and safety.



          In practice, this usually means you require special permissions, such as the case of North Korea:




          Individuals cannot use a U.S. passport to travel to, in, or through
          North Korea without a special validation from the Department of State.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 6 at 5:05









          Burhan Khalid

          34.3k363139




          34.3k363139







          • 6




            This answer seems to conflate travel advisories which advise against travel while the original question is about US imposed restrictions which incur penalties applied by the US government.
            – Jacob Horbulyk
            Mar 6 at 6:38










          • "Us Citizens have never been banned" I see this on the department of treasury website: "Is travel to Cuba for tourist activities permitted? No. Consistent with the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSRA), travel-related transactions involving Cuba are only permitted for the 12 categories of activities identified in the CACR. Travel-related transactions for other purposes remain prohibited. "
            – djna
            Mar 6 at 11:43






          • 1




            So they are not banned, just restricted. There is a difference.
            – Burhan Khalid
            Mar 6 at 11:56










          • @djna That would seem to indicate some inconsistency within the law regarding whether or not traveling to Cuba is actually "banned", as in not allowed under penalty of imprisonment or other punishment.
            – TheEnvironmentalist
            Mar 6 at 12:55






          • 2




            @TheEnvironmentalist Travel-related transactions are restricted, rather than travel itself. As a practical matter, there isn't much of a distinction, but there's no inconsistency. And if you meet the criteria laid out in the regulations (or get a special license for some other purpose I guess), such transactions are permitted, not banned.
            – Zach Lipton
            Mar 6 at 18:44












          • 6




            This answer seems to conflate travel advisories which advise against travel while the original question is about US imposed restrictions which incur penalties applied by the US government.
            – Jacob Horbulyk
            Mar 6 at 6:38










          • "Us Citizens have never been banned" I see this on the department of treasury website: "Is travel to Cuba for tourist activities permitted? No. Consistent with the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSRA), travel-related transactions involving Cuba are only permitted for the 12 categories of activities identified in the CACR. Travel-related transactions for other purposes remain prohibited. "
            – djna
            Mar 6 at 11:43






          • 1




            So they are not banned, just restricted. There is a difference.
            – Burhan Khalid
            Mar 6 at 11:56










          • @djna That would seem to indicate some inconsistency within the law regarding whether or not traveling to Cuba is actually "banned", as in not allowed under penalty of imprisonment or other punishment.
            – TheEnvironmentalist
            Mar 6 at 12:55






          • 2




            @TheEnvironmentalist Travel-related transactions are restricted, rather than travel itself. As a practical matter, there isn't much of a distinction, but there's no inconsistency. And if you meet the criteria laid out in the regulations (or get a special license for some other purpose I guess), such transactions are permitted, not banned.
            – Zach Lipton
            Mar 6 at 18:44







          6




          6




          This answer seems to conflate travel advisories which advise against travel while the original question is about US imposed restrictions which incur penalties applied by the US government.
          – Jacob Horbulyk
          Mar 6 at 6:38




          This answer seems to conflate travel advisories which advise against travel while the original question is about US imposed restrictions which incur penalties applied by the US government.
          – Jacob Horbulyk
          Mar 6 at 6:38












          "Us Citizens have never been banned" I see this on the department of treasury website: "Is travel to Cuba for tourist activities permitted? No. Consistent with the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSRA), travel-related transactions involving Cuba are only permitted for the 12 categories of activities identified in the CACR. Travel-related transactions for other purposes remain prohibited. "
          – djna
          Mar 6 at 11:43




          "Us Citizens have never been banned" I see this on the department of treasury website: "Is travel to Cuba for tourist activities permitted? No. Consistent with the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSRA), travel-related transactions involving Cuba are only permitted for the 12 categories of activities identified in the CACR. Travel-related transactions for other purposes remain prohibited. "
          – djna
          Mar 6 at 11:43




          1




          1




          So they are not banned, just restricted. There is a difference.
          – Burhan Khalid
          Mar 6 at 11:56




          So they are not banned, just restricted. There is a difference.
          – Burhan Khalid
          Mar 6 at 11:56












          @djna That would seem to indicate some inconsistency within the law regarding whether or not traveling to Cuba is actually "banned", as in not allowed under penalty of imprisonment or other punishment.
          – TheEnvironmentalist
          Mar 6 at 12:55




          @djna That would seem to indicate some inconsistency within the law regarding whether or not traveling to Cuba is actually "banned", as in not allowed under penalty of imprisonment or other punishment.
          – TheEnvironmentalist
          Mar 6 at 12:55




          2




          2




          @TheEnvironmentalist Travel-related transactions are restricted, rather than travel itself. As a practical matter, there isn't much of a distinction, but there's no inconsistency. And if you meet the criteria laid out in the regulations (or get a special license for some other purpose I guess), such transactions are permitted, not banned.
          – Zach Lipton
          Mar 6 at 18:44




          @TheEnvironmentalist Travel-related transactions are restricted, rather than travel itself. As a practical matter, there isn't much of a distinction, but there's no inconsistency. And if you meet the criteria laid out in the regulations (or get a special license for some other purpose I guess), such transactions are permitted, not banned.
          – Zach Lipton
          Mar 6 at 18:44

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110783%2fdoes-the-american-government-restrict-the-countries-its-citizens-may-travel-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest














































































          Popular posts from this blog

          𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

          Edmonton

          Crossroads (UK TV series)