Are seat reservations still valid on delayed / overcrowded trains?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I was travelling on an East Midlands train from Nottingham to Norwich. This train stops at Grantham. The previous train to Grantham was cancelled, so the train was very crowded.



I had a seat reservation. Despite this, a woman was sitting in my seat, and refused to move. She claimed that because the previous train to Grantham was cancelled, she is entitled to keep her seat reservation on this train, and I can claim my money back because my seat was unavailable. I was not going to argue with her, so allowed her to stay there.



Who was right?










share|improve this question





















  • Yes, technically you were correct. But bear in mind that this woman's train was cancelled, so it's not like she did anything to deserve losing her seat either. In these situations, there are no winners.
    – MJeffryes
    Oct 29 '17 at 14:57










  • I've been on trains that were so overcrowded they cancel all seat reservations: it's announced over the intercom, and it's cancelled for everyone. In extreme overcrowding they cancel first class as well, so anyone can sit (or more realistically stand, or more realistically still, wedge themselves with their head in someone's armpit) in any section with any ticket. They're supposed to repeat the announcement at each station but when it's like this the staff are usually so overworked they sometimes miss a station or two. Only happens when it's so full the corridors are full of people standing
    – user568458
    Oct 29 '17 at 21:59
















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I was travelling on an East Midlands train from Nottingham to Norwich. This train stops at Grantham. The previous train to Grantham was cancelled, so the train was very crowded.



I had a seat reservation. Despite this, a woman was sitting in my seat, and refused to move. She claimed that because the previous train to Grantham was cancelled, she is entitled to keep her seat reservation on this train, and I can claim my money back because my seat was unavailable. I was not going to argue with her, so allowed her to stay there.



Who was right?










share|improve this question





















  • Yes, technically you were correct. But bear in mind that this woman's train was cancelled, so it's not like she did anything to deserve losing her seat either. In these situations, there are no winners.
    – MJeffryes
    Oct 29 '17 at 14:57










  • I've been on trains that were so overcrowded they cancel all seat reservations: it's announced over the intercom, and it's cancelled for everyone. In extreme overcrowding they cancel first class as well, so anyone can sit (or more realistically stand, or more realistically still, wedge themselves with their head in someone's armpit) in any section with any ticket. They're supposed to repeat the announcement at each station but when it's like this the staff are usually so overworked they sometimes miss a station or two. Only happens when it's so full the corridors are full of people standing
    – user568458
    Oct 29 '17 at 21:59












up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





I was travelling on an East Midlands train from Nottingham to Norwich. This train stops at Grantham. The previous train to Grantham was cancelled, so the train was very crowded.



I had a seat reservation. Despite this, a woman was sitting in my seat, and refused to move. She claimed that because the previous train to Grantham was cancelled, she is entitled to keep her seat reservation on this train, and I can claim my money back because my seat was unavailable. I was not going to argue with her, so allowed her to stay there.



Who was right?










share|improve this question













I was travelling on an East Midlands train from Nottingham to Norwich. This train stops at Grantham. The previous train to Grantham was cancelled, so the train was very crowded.



I had a seat reservation. Despite this, a woman was sitting in my seat, and refused to move. She claimed that because the previous train to Grantham was cancelled, she is entitled to keep her seat reservation on this train, and I can claim my money back because my seat was unavailable. I was not going to argue with her, so allowed her to stay there.



Who was right?







uk trains






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Oct 27 '17 at 18:01









Tim

475415




475415











  • Yes, technically you were correct. But bear in mind that this woman's train was cancelled, so it's not like she did anything to deserve losing her seat either. In these situations, there are no winners.
    – MJeffryes
    Oct 29 '17 at 14:57










  • I've been on trains that were so overcrowded they cancel all seat reservations: it's announced over the intercom, and it's cancelled for everyone. In extreme overcrowding they cancel first class as well, so anyone can sit (or more realistically stand, or more realistically still, wedge themselves with their head in someone's armpit) in any section with any ticket. They're supposed to repeat the announcement at each station but when it's like this the staff are usually so overworked they sometimes miss a station or two. Only happens when it's so full the corridors are full of people standing
    – user568458
    Oct 29 '17 at 21:59
















  • Yes, technically you were correct. But bear in mind that this woman's train was cancelled, so it's not like she did anything to deserve losing her seat either. In these situations, there are no winners.
    – MJeffryes
    Oct 29 '17 at 14:57










  • I've been on trains that were so overcrowded they cancel all seat reservations: it's announced over the intercom, and it's cancelled for everyone. In extreme overcrowding they cancel first class as well, so anyone can sit (or more realistically stand, or more realistically still, wedge themselves with their head in someone's armpit) in any section with any ticket. They're supposed to repeat the announcement at each station but when it's like this the staff are usually so overworked they sometimes miss a station or two. Only happens when it's so full the corridors are full of people standing
    – user568458
    Oct 29 '17 at 21:59















Yes, technically you were correct. But bear in mind that this woman's train was cancelled, so it's not like she did anything to deserve losing her seat either. In these situations, there are no winners.
– MJeffryes
Oct 29 '17 at 14:57




Yes, technically you were correct. But bear in mind that this woman's train was cancelled, so it's not like she did anything to deserve losing her seat either. In these situations, there are no winners.
– MJeffryes
Oct 29 '17 at 14:57












I've been on trains that were so overcrowded they cancel all seat reservations: it's announced over the intercom, and it's cancelled for everyone. In extreme overcrowding they cancel first class as well, so anyone can sit (or more realistically stand, or more realistically still, wedge themselves with their head in someone's armpit) in any section with any ticket. They're supposed to repeat the announcement at each station but when it's like this the staff are usually so overworked they sometimes miss a station or two. Only happens when it's so full the corridors are full of people standing
– user568458
Oct 29 '17 at 21:59




I've been on trains that were so overcrowded they cancel all seat reservations: it's announced over the intercom, and it's cancelled for everyone. In extreme overcrowding they cancel first class as well, so anyone can sit (or more realistically stand, or more realistically still, wedge themselves with their head in someone's armpit) in any section with any ticket. They're supposed to repeat the announcement at each station but when it's like this the staff are usually so overworked they sometimes miss a station or two. Only happens when it's so full the corridors are full of people standing
– user568458
Oct 29 '17 at 21:59










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote













You were right. Her reserved seat was on the cancelled train.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    5
    down vote













    In cases like this, you need to go fetch the conductor.



    She knows her rights and knows that you cannot remove her from the seat bodily, so if she stays put, she keeps the seat and you go hungry. It was no risk to her to bet that you would not go get the conductor.



    If you get the conductor, he can not only fetch guards to physically remove her, he can hold the train until she leaves (earning her the wrath of the whole car), and then kick her off the train and void her ticket. You bet she knows that, and would comply after a short and futile argument with the conductor.



    When people are jerks, it's almost an imperative to challenge it. But how do you avoid being wrong and accidentally being the jerk? The answer is you seek the neutral expert moderator: the conductor.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 1




      To be fair to the woman, she is equally a victim of the TOC in this situation. It was just luck that meant that it was the train containing "her" seat which was cancelled, and not Tim's. I think even if the conductor had been called, they would probably not have done anything other than asking her to move. Forcing paying customers out of a seat, after cancelling their train, doesn't look good on the news.
      – MJeffryes
      Oct 29 '17 at 14:54


















    up vote
    4
    down vote













    The problem is, OP 'willingly' gave up his seat so East Midlands is kinda off the hook.



    The conductor could have sorted this out onboard as it was OP's seat. The other passenger was in the wrong seat.



    It's really no different that switching seats on an airplane, then complaining after the fact. East Midlands was not given the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 1




      There was no conductor that I saw. My ticket was not looked at. I’m not sure if I gave it up willingly or not. I just didn’t want to cause a scene.
      – Tim
      Oct 27 '17 at 21:58







    • 2




      @Tim There were certainly Conductors on board, maybe not right in that carriage at that moment. Next time, just find or wait for one and they can resolve the situation.
      – Johns-305
      Oct 28 '17 at 11:42






    • 1




      as stated, it was only 2 carriages. I did not see one during my 60 minute journey. Perhaps they stayed in the other carriage, that seems strange.
      – Tim
      Oct 28 '17 at 11:42











    • It's not like airplane seats at all! Airplanes are not allowed to take off with standees. Trains are. OP is not whining about being moved from 21C to 31D. He's complaining about being made to stand for an hour.
      – Harper
      Oct 28 '17 at 16:34







    • 5




      In my experience, train crew often don't come through "relief" trains like this one, partly because of overcrowding blocking the aisles, and partly because it's full of angry people who've had their journey disrupted, some of whom are all too willing to take it out on the (blameless) conductor. So I find it quite credible that no TOC personnel walked the train at any point during the entire journey, which (to my mind) does relieve the OP from any charge that (s)he failed to give the TOC "the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so".
      – MadHatter
      Oct 29 '17 at 7:01










    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "273"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104427%2fare-seat-reservations-still-valid-on-delayed-overcrowded-trains%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    7
    down vote













    You were right. Her reserved seat was on the cancelled train.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      7
      down vote













      You were right. Her reserved seat was on the cancelled train.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        7
        down vote










        up vote
        7
        down vote









        You were right. Her reserved seat was on the cancelled train.






        share|improve this answer












        You were right. Her reserved seat was on the cancelled train.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Oct 27 '17 at 18:20









        user16259

        3,593820




        3,593820






















            up vote
            5
            down vote













            In cases like this, you need to go fetch the conductor.



            She knows her rights and knows that you cannot remove her from the seat bodily, so if she stays put, she keeps the seat and you go hungry. It was no risk to her to bet that you would not go get the conductor.



            If you get the conductor, he can not only fetch guards to physically remove her, he can hold the train until she leaves (earning her the wrath of the whole car), and then kick her off the train and void her ticket. You bet she knows that, and would comply after a short and futile argument with the conductor.



            When people are jerks, it's almost an imperative to challenge it. But how do you avoid being wrong and accidentally being the jerk? The answer is you seek the neutral expert moderator: the conductor.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              To be fair to the woman, she is equally a victim of the TOC in this situation. It was just luck that meant that it was the train containing "her" seat which was cancelled, and not Tim's. I think even if the conductor had been called, they would probably not have done anything other than asking her to move. Forcing paying customers out of a seat, after cancelling their train, doesn't look good on the news.
              – MJeffryes
              Oct 29 '17 at 14:54















            up vote
            5
            down vote













            In cases like this, you need to go fetch the conductor.



            She knows her rights and knows that you cannot remove her from the seat bodily, so if she stays put, she keeps the seat and you go hungry. It was no risk to her to bet that you would not go get the conductor.



            If you get the conductor, he can not only fetch guards to physically remove her, he can hold the train until she leaves (earning her the wrath of the whole car), and then kick her off the train and void her ticket. You bet she knows that, and would comply after a short and futile argument with the conductor.



            When people are jerks, it's almost an imperative to challenge it. But how do you avoid being wrong and accidentally being the jerk? The answer is you seek the neutral expert moderator: the conductor.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              To be fair to the woman, she is equally a victim of the TOC in this situation. It was just luck that meant that it was the train containing "her" seat which was cancelled, and not Tim's. I think even if the conductor had been called, they would probably not have done anything other than asking her to move. Forcing paying customers out of a seat, after cancelling their train, doesn't look good on the news.
              – MJeffryes
              Oct 29 '17 at 14:54













            up vote
            5
            down vote










            up vote
            5
            down vote









            In cases like this, you need to go fetch the conductor.



            She knows her rights and knows that you cannot remove her from the seat bodily, so if she stays put, she keeps the seat and you go hungry. It was no risk to her to bet that you would not go get the conductor.



            If you get the conductor, he can not only fetch guards to physically remove her, he can hold the train until she leaves (earning her the wrath of the whole car), and then kick her off the train and void her ticket. You bet she knows that, and would comply after a short and futile argument with the conductor.



            When people are jerks, it's almost an imperative to challenge it. But how do you avoid being wrong and accidentally being the jerk? The answer is you seek the neutral expert moderator: the conductor.






            share|improve this answer












            In cases like this, you need to go fetch the conductor.



            She knows her rights and knows that you cannot remove her from the seat bodily, so if she stays put, she keeps the seat and you go hungry. It was no risk to her to bet that you would not go get the conductor.



            If you get the conductor, he can not only fetch guards to physically remove her, he can hold the train until she leaves (earning her the wrath of the whole car), and then kick her off the train and void her ticket. You bet she knows that, and would comply after a short and futile argument with the conductor.



            When people are jerks, it's almost an imperative to challenge it. But how do you avoid being wrong and accidentally being the jerk? The answer is you seek the neutral expert moderator: the conductor.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Oct 28 '17 at 16:29









            Harper

            8,82431744




            8,82431744







            • 1




              To be fair to the woman, she is equally a victim of the TOC in this situation. It was just luck that meant that it was the train containing "her" seat which was cancelled, and not Tim's. I think even if the conductor had been called, they would probably not have done anything other than asking her to move. Forcing paying customers out of a seat, after cancelling their train, doesn't look good on the news.
              – MJeffryes
              Oct 29 '17 at 14:54













            • 1




              To be fair to the woman, she is equally a victim of the TOC in this situation. It was just luck that meant that it was the train containing "her" seat which was cancelled, and not Tim's. I think even if the conductor had been called, they would probably not have done anything other than asking her to move. Forcing paying customers out of a seat, after cancelling their train, doesn't look good on the news.
              – MJeffryes
              Oct 29 '17 at 14:54








            1




            1




            To be fair to the woman, she is equally a victim of the TOC in this situation. It was just luck that meant that it was the train containing "her" seat which was cancelled, and not Tim's. I think even if the conductor had been called, they would probably not have done anything other than asking her to move. Forcing paying customers out of a seat, after cancelling their train, doesn't look good on the news.
            – MJeffryes
            Oct 29 '17 at 14:54





            To be fair to the woman, she is equally a victim of the TOC in this situation. It was just luck that meant that it was the train containing "her" seat which was cancelled, and not Tim's. I think even if the conductor had been called, they would probably not have done anything other than asking her to move. Forcing paying customers out of a seat, after cancelling their train, doesn't look good on the news.
            – MJeffryes
            Oct 29 '17 at 14:54











            up vote
            4
            down vote













            The problem is, OP 'willingly' gave up his seat so East Midlands is kinda off the hook.



            The conductor could have sorted this out onboard as it was OP's seat. The other passenger was in the wrong seat.



            It's really no different that switching seats on an airplane, then complaining after the fact. East Midlands was not given the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              There was no conductor that I saw. My ticket was not looked at. I’m not sure if I gave it up willingly or not. I just didn’t want to cause a scene.
              – Tim
              Oct 27 '17 at 21:58







            • 2




              @Tim There were certainly Conductors on board, maybe not right in that carriage at that moment. Next time, just find or wait for one and they can resolve the situation.
              – Johns-305
              Oct 28 '17 at 11:42






            • 1




              as stated, it was only 2 carriages. I did not see one during my 60 minute journey. Perhaps they stayed in the other carriage, that seems strange.
              – Tim
              Oct 28 '17 at 11:42











            • It's not like airplane seats at all! Airplanes are not allowed to take off with standees. Trains are. OP is not whining about being moved from 21C to 31D. He's complaining about being made to stand for an hour.
              – Harper
              Oct 28 '17 at 16:34







            • 5




              In my experience, train crew often don't come through "relief" trains like this one, partly because of overcrowding blocking the aisles, and partly because it's full of angry people who've had their journey disrupted, some of whom are all too willing to take it out on the (blameless) conductor. So I find it quite credible that no TOC personnel walked the train at any point during the entire journey, which (to my mind) does relieve the OP from any charge that (s)he failed to give the TOC "the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so".
              – MadHatter
              Oct 29 '17 at 7:01














            up vote
            4
            down vote













            The problem is, OP 'willingly' gave up his seat so East Midlands is kinda off the hook.



            The conductor could have sorted this out onboard as it was OP's seat. The other passenger was in the wrong seat.



            It's really no different that switching seats on an airplane, then complaining after the fact. East Midlands was not given the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              There was no conductor that I saw. My ticket was not looked at. I’m not sure if I gave it up willingly or not. I just didn’t want to cause a scene.
              – Tim
              Oct 27 '17 at 21:58







            • 2




              @Tim There were certainly Conductors on board, maybe not right in that carriage at that moment. Next time, just find or wait for one and they can resolve the situation.
              – Johns-305
              Oct 28 '17 at 11:42






            • 1




              as stated, it was only 2 carriages. I did not see one during my 60 minute journey. Perhaps they stayed in the other carriage, that seems strange.
              – Tim
              Oct 28 '17 at 11:42











            • It's not like airplane seats at all! Airplanes are not allowed to take off with standees. Trains are. OP is not whining about being moved from 21C to 31D. He's complaining about being made to stand for an hour.
              – Harper
              Oct 28 '17 at 16:34







            • 5




              In my experience, train crew often don't come through "relief" trains like this one, partly because of overcrowding blocking the aisles, and partly because it's full of angry people who've had their journey disrupted, some of whom are all too willing to take it out on the (blameless) conductor. So I find it quite credible that no TOC personnel walked the train at any point during the entire journey, which (to my mind) does relieve the OP from any charge that (s)he failed to give the TOC "the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so".
              – MadHatter
              Oct 29 '17 at 7:01












            up vote
            4
            down vote










            up vote
            4
            down vote









            The problem is, OP 'willingly' gave up his seat so East Midlands is kinda off the hook.



            The conductor could have sorted this out onboard as it was OP's seat. The other passenger was in the wrong seat.



            It's really no different that switching seats on an airplane, then complaining after the fact. East Midlands was not given the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so.






            share|improve this answer












            The problem is, OP 'willingly' gave up his seat so East Midlands is kinda off the hook.



            The conductor could have sorted this out onboard as it was OP's seat. The other passenger was in the wrong seat.



            It's really no different that switching seats on an airplane, then complaining after the fact. East Midlands was not given the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Oct 27 '17 at 18:35









            Johns-305

            26.5k5490




            26.5k5490







            • 1




              There was no conductor that I saw. My ticket was not looked at. I’m not sure if I gave it up willingly or not. I just didn’t want to cause a scene.
              – Tim
              Oct 27 '17 at 21:58







            • 2




              @Tim There were certainly Conductors on board, maybe not right in that carriage at that moment. Next time, just find or wait for one and they can resolve the situation.
              – Johns-305
              Oct 28 '17 at 11:42






            • 1




              as stated, it was only 2 carriages. I did not see one during my 60 minute journey. Perhaps they stayed in the other carriage, that seems strange.
              – Tim
              Oct 28 '17 at 11:42











            • It's not like airplane seats at all! Airplanes are not allowed to take off with standees. Trains are. OP is not whining about being moved from 21C to 31D. He's complaining about being made to stand for an hour.
              – Harper
              Oct 28 '17 at 16:34







            • 5




              In my experience, train crew often don't come through "relief" trains like this one, partly because of overcrowding blocking the aisles, and partly because it's full of angry people who've had their journey disrupted, some of whom are all too willing to take it out on the (blameless) conductor. So I find it quite credible that no TOC personnel walked the train at any point during the entire journey, which (to my mind) does relieve the OP from any charge that (s)he failed to give the TOC "the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so".
              – MadHatter
              Oct 29 '17 at 7:01












            • 1




              There was no conductor that I saw. My ticket was not looked at. I’m not sure if I gave it up willingly or not. I just didn’t want to cause a scene.
              – Tim
              Oct 27 '17 at 21:58







            • 2




              @Tim There were certainly Conductors on board, maybe not right in that carriage at that moment. Next time, just find or wait for one and they can resolve the situation.
              – Johns-305
              Oct 28 '17 at 11:42






            • 1




              as stated, it was only 2 carriages. I did not see one during my 60 minute journey. Perhaps they stayed in the other carriage, that seems strange.
              – Tim
              Oct 28 '17 at 11:42











            • It's not like airplane seats at all! Airplanes are not allowed to take off with standees. Trains are. OP is not whining about being moved from 21C to 31D. He's complaining about being made to stand for an hour.
              – Harper
              Oct 28 '17 at 16:34







            • 5




              In my experience, train crew often don't come through "relief" trains like this one, partly because of overcrowding blocking the aisles, and partly because it's full of angry people who've had their journey disrupted, some of whom are all too willing to take it out on the (blameless) conductor. So I find it quite credible that no TOC personnel walked the train at any point during the entire journey, which (to my mind) does relieve the OP from any charge that (s)he failed to give the TOC "the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so".
              – MadHatter
              Oct 29 '17 at 7:01







            1




            1




            There was no conductor that I saw. My ticket was not looked at. I’m not sure if I gave it up willingly or not. I just didn’t want to cause a scene.
            – Tim
            Oct 27 '17 at 21:58





            There was no conductor that I saw. My ticket was not looked at. I’m not sure if I gave it up willingly or not. I just didn’t want to cause a scene.
            – Tim
            Oct 27 '17 at 21:58





            2




            2




            @Tim There were certainly Conductors on board, maybe not right in that carriage at that moment. Next time, just find or wait for one and they can resolve the situation.
            – Johns-305
            Oct 28 '17 at 11:42




            @Tim There were certainly Conductors on board, maybe not right in that carriage at that moment. Next time, just find or wait for one and they can resolve the situation.
            – Johns-305
            Oct 28 '17 at 11:42




            1




            1




            as stated, it was only 2 carriages. I did not see one during my 60 minute journey. Perhaps they stayed in the other carriage, that seems strange.
            – Tim
            Oct 28 '17 at 11:42





            as stated, it was only 2 carriages. I did not see one during my 60 minute journey. Perhaps they stayed in the other carriage, that seems strange.
            – Tim
            Oct 28 '17 at 11:42













            It's not like airplane seats at all! Airplanes are not allowed to take off with standees. Trains are. OP is not whining about being moved from 21C to 31D. He's complaining about being made to stand for an hour.
            – Harper
            Oct 28 '17 at 16:34





            It's not like airplane seats at all! Airplanes are not allowed to take off with standees. Trains are. OP is not whining about being moved from 21C to 31D. He's complaining about being made to stand for an hour.
            – Harper
            Oct 28 '17 at 16:34





            5




            5




            In my experience, train crew often don't come through "relief" trains like this one, partly because of overcrowding blocking the aisles, and partly because it's full of angry people who've had their journey disrupted, some of whom are all too willing to take it out on the (blameless) conductor. So I find it quite credible that no TOC personnel walked the train at any point during the entire journey, which (to my mind) does relieve the OP from any charge that (s)he failed to give the TOC "the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so".
            – MadHatter
            Oct 29 '17 at 7:01




            In my experience, train crew often don't come through "relief" trains like this one, partly because of overcrowding blocking the aisles, and partly because it's full of angry people who've had their journey disrupted, some of whom are all too willing to take it out on the (blameless) conductor. So I find it quite credible that no TOC personnel walked the train at any point during the entire journey, which (to my mind) does relieve the OP from any charge that (s)he failed to give the TOC "the opportunity to correct the situation when they could have actually done so".
            – MadHatter
            Oct 29 '17 at 7:01

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104427%2fare-seat-reservations-still-valid-on-delayed-overcrowded-trains%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest














































































            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            How do I collapse sections of code in Visual Studio Code for Windows?

            ャフサォクコ ケウ,コ,ワ メ,ロスョノ゙,クネ,フムカヤヲニ,エコ゚ツ ウイオン゙ケワサネォキモュキォウイノンコチ゚メヌナイゥフュ,カヒウネェ ネ,ホノケ,ムュキ ッボーミュハ,チ ツス ィ メウイマヤ,゙ウチ ヅ ロ,ォジヌェ ャヌット ェ,マャ,チナエヒネソキツテ トホヲヲミーァ