Is it safe to travel now to Ecuador due to earthquakes?
I would like to travel to Ecuador but I don't know if it is safe to go there because of the earthquakes of the last days.
In case I can't visit this country know, how much should I wait till I could travel there without any risk?
safety event-based-effects ecuador
add a comment |
I would like to travel to Ecuador but I don't know if it is safe to go there because of the earthquakes of the last days.
In case I can't visit this country know, how much should I wait till I could travel there without any risk?
safety event-based-effects ecuador
You will always have some risk, it is in the ring of fire.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
add a comment |
I would like to travel to Ecuador but I don't know if it is safe to go there because of the earthquakes of the last days.
In case I can't visit this country know, how much should I wait till I could travel there without any risk?
safety event-based-effects ecuador
I would like to travel to Ecuador but I don't know if it is safe to go there because of the earthquakes of the last days.
In case I can't visit this country know, how much should I wait till I could travel there without any risk?
safety event-based-effects ecuador
safety event-based-effects ecuador
edited Apr 21 '16 at 13:39
CMaster
10.7k44792
10.7k44792
asked Apr 21 '16 at 13:25
John MillerJohn Miller
15
15
You will always have some risk, it is in the ring of fire.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
add a comment |
You will always have some risk, it is in the ring of fire.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
You will always have some risk, it is in the ring of fire.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
You will always have some risk, it is in the ring of fire.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes, it is as safe as before. There is a lot of rubble in some coastal towns but the rest of the country is intact. Most major city for tourism, the entire Andes, Galapagos, Amazon and cloud-forests are just as they were before the earthquake.
This is incorrect. I just left. Every major city is not the same. Bahia de Caraquez is badly damaged. The Malecon has fallen into the ocean, a tower block came down killing people and the city has widespread damage. If you want an idea then say south of Atacames to Manta is problematic.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
add a comment |
After a major earthquake, the area typically experiences aftershocks for quite some time. Every earthquake series is different, but by way of example consider the 2010 Christchurch earthquakes. The largest one (the first of the series) was a 7.1 in September 2010. The most destructive was a 6.3 five months later, in February 2011. There have been 65 quakes over magnitude 5.0 since then, the most recent in March 2016.
If you visit the affected coastal areas of Ecuador for the next few years, you are likely to experience earthquakes of some magnitude.
As far as personal safety, as long as you don't do risky things like entering damaged buildings in quake-prone areas, you should be fine. Everything that is likely to collapse probably already has, but no guarantees.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66995%2fis-it-safe-to-travel-now-to-ecuador-due-to-earthquakes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, it is as safe as before. There is a lot of rubble in some coastal towns but the rest of the country is intact. Most major city for tourism, the entire Andes, Galapagos, Amazon and cloud-forests are just as they were before the earthquake.
This is incorrect. I just left. Every major city is not the same. Bahia de Caraquez is badly damaged. The Malecon has fallen into the ocean, a tower block came down killing people and the city has widespread damage. If you want an idea then say south of Atacames to Manta is problematic.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
add a comment |
Yes, it is as safe as before. There is a lot of rubble in some coastal towns but the rest of the country is intact. Most major city for tourism, the entire Andes, Galapagos, Amazon and cloud-forests are just as they were before the earthquake.
This is incorrect. I just left. Every major city is not the same. Bahia de Caraquez is badly damaged. The Malecon has fallen into the ocean, a tower block came down killing people and the city has widespread damage. If you want an idea then say south of Atacames to Manta is problematic.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
add a comment |
Yes, it is as safe as before. There is a lot of rubble in some coastal towns but the rest of the country is intact. Most major city for tourism, the entire Andes, Galapagos, Amazon and cloud-forests are just as they were before the earthquake.
Yes, it is as safe as before. There is a lot of rubble in some coastal towns but the rest of the country is intact. Most major city for tourism, the entire Andes, Galapagos, Amazon and cloud-forests are just as they were before the earthquake.
edited May 26 '16 at 16:17
answered Apr 21 '16 at 13:32
ItaiItai
29.9k972158
29.9k972158
This is incorrect. I just left. Every major city is not the same. Bahia de Caraquez is badly damaged. The Malecon has fallen into the ocean, a tower block came down killing people and the city has widespread damage. If you want an idea then say south of Atacames to Manta is problematic.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
add a comment |
This is incorrect. I just left. Every major city is not the same. Bahia de Caraquez is badly damaged. The Malecon has fallen into the ocean, a tower block came down killing people and the city has widespread damage. If you want an idea then say south of Atacames to Manta is problematic.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
This is incorrect. I just left. Every major city is not the same. Bahia de Caraquez is badly damaged. The Malecon has fallen into the ocean, a tower block came down killing people and the city has widespread damage. If you want an idea then say south of Atacames to Manta is problematic.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
This is incorrect. I just left. Every major city is not the same. Bahia de Caraquez is badly damaged. The Malecon has fallen into the ocean, a tower block came down killing people and the city has widespread damage. If you want an idea then say south of Atacames to Manta is problematic.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24
add a comment |
After a major earthquake, the area typically experiences aftershocks for quite some time. Every earthquake series is different, but by way of example consider the 2010 Christchurch earthquakes. The largest one (the first of the series) was a 7.1 in September 2010. The most destructive was a 6.3 five months later, in February 2011. There have been 65 quakes over magnitude 5.0 since then, the most recent in March 2016.
If you visit the affected coastal areas of Ecuador for the next few years, you are likely to experience earthquakes of some magnitude.
As far as personal safety, as long as you don't do risky things like entering damaged buildings in quake-prone areas, you should be fine. Everything that is likely to collapse probably already has, but no guarantees.
add a comment |
After a major earthquake, the area typically experiences aftershocks for quite some time. Every earthquake series is different, but by way of example consider the 2010 Christchurch earthquakes. The largest one (the first of the series) was a 7.1 in September 2010. The most destructive was a 6.3 five months later, in February 2011. There have been 65 quakes over magnitude 5.0 since then, the most recent in March 2016.
If you visit the affected coastal areas of Ecuador for the next few years, you are likely to experience earthquakes of some magnitude.
As far as personal safety, as long as you don't do risky things like entering damaged buildings in quake-prone areas, you should be fine. Everything that is likely to collapse probably already has, but no guarantees.
add a comment |
After a major earthquake, the area typically experiences aftershocks for quite some time. Every earthquake series is different, but by way of example consider the 2010 Christchurch earthquakes. The largest one (the first of the series) was a 7.1 in September 2010. The most destructive was a 6.3 five months later, in February 2011. There have been 65 quakes over magnitude 5.0 since then, the most recent in March 2016.
If you visit the affected coastal areas of Ecuador for the next few years, you are likely to experience earthquakes of some magnitude.
As far as personal safety, as long as you don't do risky things like entering damaged buildings in quake-prone areas, you should be fine. Everything that is likely to collapse probably already has, but no guarantees.
After a major earthquake, the area typically experiences aftershocks for quite some time. Every earthquake series is different, but by way of example consider the 2010 Christchurch earthquakes. The largest one (the first of the series) was a 7.1 in September 2010. The most destructive was a 6.3 five months later, in February 2011. There have been 65 quakes over magnitude 5.0 since then, the most recent in March 2016.
If you visit the affected coastal areas of Ecuador for the next few years, you are likely to experience earthquakes of some magnitude.
As far as personal safety, as long as you don't do risky things like entering damaged buildings in quake-prone areas, you should be fine. Everything that is likely to collapse probably already has, but no guarantees.
answered Apr 21 '16 at 20:05
Greg HewgillGreg Hewgill
27.5k373103
27.5k373103
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66995%2fis-it-safe-to-travel-now-to-ecuador-due-to-earthquakes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You will always have some risk, it is in the ring of fire.
– If you do not know- just GIS
May 26 '16 at 13:24