Misunderstanding of percentage increase [duplicate]

Multi tool use
Multi tool use









27












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Meaning of “Percent increase”

    1 answer



If something increase $50$ to $200$, I know that it is $400%$ increment using common sense.



I can get this using $dfrac20050times 100% = 400%$.



If something increase $50$ to $52$, I know that it is $4%$ increment using common sense.



But if I apply the same logic, $dfrac5250times 100% = 104%$.



What is the problem in my logic?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Delta-u, Adrian Keister, José Carlos Santos, Strants, sds Aug 29 '18 at 17:50


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 25




    $begingroup$
    It is worth mentioning that your mistake is very common. For small increases, the percentage is usually correct. As the increase gets larger, mistakes become frequent. It is common to confuse $4$ times bigger with $400 %$ more. Think about $100 %$ bigger which means double and not the same.
    $endgroup$
    – badjohn
    Aug 28 '18 at 7:56











  • $begingroup$
    @badjohn Yes, Even after doing maths for AL and even after getting "B" grade I am really ashamed of myself.
    $endgroup$
    – I am the Most Stupid Person
    Aug 28 '18 at 8:22







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Don't be too harsh on yourself, as I said, it is a common mistake. An interesting question is at what point people tend to switch. $100 %$ is usually correctly interpreted as double. By your example of $400 %$, the mistake is common. How is $200 %$ commonly perceived?
    $endgroup$
    – badjohn
    Aug 28 '18 at 9:32






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Note that the other words around the percent number itself make a big difference. $200$ is $400%$ of $50$, but $200$ is a $300%$ increase from $50$, or is $300%$ more than $50$. $52$ is $104%$ of $50$, but $52$ is a $4%$ increase from $50$, or is $4%$ more than $50$. "Percent more than" is equal to "percent of" minus $100$.
    $endgroup$
    – Todd Wilcox
    Aug 28 '18 at 13:19







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have heard an anecdotal story on percentage increase: There was a debate on "Do law students have to study Mathematics?" The lawyer claimed it was not necessary for them. The mathematician asked him the question: "Last year there were $80$ crimes, this year there were $100$ crimes. How much percentage increase is this?" The lawyer quickly and with confidence replied "$20$ percent"... The moral of the story is the mathematics is necessary for each and every subject and profession.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Aug 28 '18 at 14:31
















27












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Meaning of “Percent increase”

    1 answer



If something increase $50$ to $200$, I know that it is $400%$ increment using common sense.



I can get this using $dfrac20050times 100% = 400%$.



If something increase $50$ to $52$, I know that it is $4%$ increment using common sense.



But if I apply the same logic, $dfrac5250times 100% = 104%$.



What is the problem in my logic?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Delta-u, Adrian Keister, José Carlos Santos, Strants, sds Aug 29 '18 at 17:50


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 25




    $begingroup$
    It is worth mentioning that your mistake is very common. For small increases, the percentage is usually correct. As the increase gets larger, mistakes become frequent. It is common to confuse $4$ times bigger with $400 %$ more. Think about $100 %$ bigger which means double and not the same.
    $endgroup$
    – badjohn
    Aug 28 '18 at 7:56











  • $begingroup$
    @badjohn Yes, Even after doing maths for AL and even after getting "B" grade I am really ashamed of myself.
    $endgroup$
    – I am the Most Stupid Person
    Aug 28 '18 at 8:22







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Don't be too harsh on yourself, as I said, it is a common mistake. An interesting question is at what point people tend to switch. $100 %$ is usually correctly interpreted as double. By your example of $400 %$, the mistake is common. How is $200 %$ commonly perceived?
    $endgroup$
    – badjohn
    Aug 28 '18 at 9:32






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Note that the other words around the percent number itself make a big difference. $200$ is $400%$ of $50$, but $200$ is a $300%$ increase from $50$, or is $300%$ more than $50$. $52$ is $104%$ of $50$, but $52$ is a $4%$ increase from $50$, or is $4%$ more than $50$. "Percent more than" is equal to "percent of" minus $100$.
    $endgroup$
    – Todd Wilcox
    Aug 28 '18 at 13:19







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have heard an anecdotal story on percentage increase: There was a debate on "Do law students have to study Mathematics?" The lawyer claimed it was not necessary for them. The mathematician asked him the question: "Last year there were $80$ crimes, this year there were $100$ crimes. How much percentage increase is this?" The lawyer quickly and with confidence replied "$20$ percent"... The moral of the story is the mathematics is necessary for each and every subject and profession.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Aug 28 '18 at 14:31














27












27








27


7



$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Meaning of “Percent increase”

    1 answer



If something increase $50$ to $200$, I know that it is $400%$ increment using common sense.



I can get this using $dfrac20050times 100% = 400%$.



If something increase $50$ to $52$, I know that it is $4%$ increment using common sense.



But if I apply the same logic, $dfrac5250times 100% = 104%$.



What is the problem in my logic?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:



  • Meaning of “Percent increase”

    1 answer



If something increase $50$ to $200$, I know that it is $400%$ increment using common sense.



I can get this using $dfrac20050times 100% = 400%$.



If something increase $50$ to $52$, I know that it is $4%$ increment using common sense.



But if I apply the same logic, $dfrac5250times 100% = 104%$.



What is the problem in my logic?





This question already has an answer here:



  • Meaning of “Percent increase”

    1 answer







percentages






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 29 '18 at 0:30









Chase Ryan Taylor

4,43721531




4,43721531










asked Aug 28 '18 at 6:54









I am the Most Stupid PersonI am the Most Stupid Person

25327




25327




marked as duplicate by Delta-u, Adrian Keister, José Carlos Santos, Strants, sds Aug 29 '18 at 17:50


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Delta-u, Adrian Keister, José Carlos Santos, Strants, sds Aug 29 '18 at 17:50


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 25




    $begingroup$
    It is worth mentioning that your mistake is very common. For small increases, the percentage is usually correct. As the increase gets larger, mistakes become frequent. It is common to confuse $4$ times bigger with $400 %$ more. Think about $100 %$ bigger which means double and not the same.
    $endgroup$
    – badjohn
    Aug 28 '18 at 7:56











  • $begingroup$
    @badjohn Yes, Even after doing maths for AL and even after getting "B" grade I am really ashamed of myself.
    $endgroup$
    – I am the Most Stupid Person
    Aug 28 '18 at 8:22







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Don't be too harsh on yourself, as I said, it is a common mistake. An interesting question is at what point people tend to switch. $100 %$ is usually correctly interpreted as double. By your example of $400 %$, the mistake is common. How is $200 %$ commonly perceived?
    $endgroup$
    – badjohn
    Aug 28 '18 at 9:32






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Note that the other words around the percent number itself make a big difference. $200$ is $400%$ of $50$, but $200$ is a $300%$ increase from $50$, or is $300%$ more than $50$. $52$ is $104%$ of $50$, but $52$ is a $4%$ increase from $50$, or is $4%$ more than $50$. "Percent more than" is equal to "percent of" minus $100$.
    $endgroup$
    – Todd Wilcox
    Aug 28 '18 at 13:19







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have heard an anecdotal story on percentage increase: There was a debate on "Do law students have to study Mathematics?" The lawyer claimed it was not necessary for them. The mathematician asked him the question: "Last year there were $80$ crimes, this year there were $100$ crimes. How much percentage increase is this?" The lawyer quickly and with confidence replied "$20$ percent"... The moral of the story is the mathematics is necessary for each and every subject and profession.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Aug 28 '18 at 14:31













  • 25




    $begingroup$
    It is worth mentioning that your mistake is very common. For small increases, the percentage is usually correct. As the increase gets larger, mistakes become frequent. It is common to confuse $4$ times bigger with $400 %$ more. Think about $100 %$ bigger which means double and not the same.
    $endgroup$
    – badjohn
    Aug 28 '18 at 7:56











  • $begingroup$
    @badjohn Yes, Even after doing maths for AL and even after getting "B" grade I am really ashamed of myself.
    $endgroup$
    – I am the Most Stupid Person
    Aug 28 '18 at 8:22







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Don't be too harsh on yourself, as I said, it is a common mistake. An interesting question is at what point people tend to switch. $100 %$ is usually correctly interpreted as double. By your example of $400 %$, the mistake is common. How is $200 %$ commonly perceived?
    $endgroup$
    – badjohn
    Aug 28 '18 at 9:32






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Note that the other words around the percent number itself make a big difference. $200$ is $400%$ of $50$, but $200$ is a $300%$ increase from $50$, or is $300%$ more than $50$. $52$ is $104%$ of $50$, but $52$ is a $4%$ increase from $50$, or is $4%$ more than $50$. "Percent more than" is equal to "percent of" minus $100$.
    $endgroup$
    – Todd Wilcox
    Aug 28 '18 at 13:19







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have heard an anecdotal story on percentage increase: There was a debate on "Do law students have to study Mathematics?" The lawyer claimed it was not necessary for them. The mathematician asked him the question: "Last year there were $80$ crimes, this year there were $100$ crimes. How much percentage increase is this?" The lawyer quickly and with confidence replied "$20$ percent"... The moral of the story is the mathematics is necessary for each and every subject and profession.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Aug 28 '18 at 14:31








25




25




$begingroup$
It is worth mentioning that your mistake is very common. For small increases, the percentage is usually correct. As the increase gets larger, mistakes become frequent. It is common to confuse $4$ times bigger with $400 %$ more. Think about $100 %$ bigger which means double and not the same.
$endgroup$
– badjohn
Aug 28 '18 at 7:56





$begingroup$
It is worth mentioning that your mistake is very common. For small increases, the percentage is usually correct. As the increase gets larger, mistakes become frequent. It is common to confuse $4$ times bigger with $400 %$ more. Think about $100 %$ bigger which means double and not the same.
$endgroup$
– badjohn
Aug 28 '18 at 7:56













$begingroup$
@badjohn Yes, Even after doing maths for AL and even after getting "B" grade I am really ashamed of myself.
$endgroup$
– I am the Most Stupid Person
Aug 28 '18 at 8:22





$begingroup$
@badjohn Yes, Even after doing maths for AL and even after getting "B" grade I am really ashamed of myself.
$endgroup$
– I am the Most Stupid Person
Aug 28 '18 at 8:22





2




2




$begingroup$
Don't be too harsh on yourself, as I said, it is a common mistake. An interesting question is at what point people tend to switch. $100 %$ is usually correctly interpreted as double. By your example of $400 %$, the mistake is common. How is $200 %$ commonly perceived?
$endgroup$
– badjohn
Aug 28 '18 at 9:32




$begingroup$
Don't be too harsh on yourself, as I said, it is a common mistake. An interesting question is at what point people tend to switch. $100 %$ is usually correctly interpreted as double. By your example of $400 %$, the mistake is common. How is $200 %$ commonly perceived?
$endgroup$
– badjohn
Aug 28 '18 at 9:32




8




8




$begingroup$
Note that the other words around the percent number itself make a big difference. $200$ is $400%$ of $50$, but $200$ is a $300%$ increase from $50$, or is $300%$ more than $50$. $52$ is $104%$ of $50$, but $52$ is a $4%$ increase from $50$, or is $4%$ more than $50$. "Percent more than" is equal to "percent of" minus $100$.
$endgroup$
– Todd Wilcox
Aug 28 '18 at 13:19





$begingroup$
Note that the other words around the percent number itself make a big difference. $200$ is $400%$ of $50$, but $200$ is a $300%$ increase from $50$, or is $300%$ more than $50$. $52$ is $104%$ of $50$, but $52$ is a $4%$ increase from $50$, or is $4%$ more than $50$. "Percent more than" is equal to "percent of" minus $100$.
$endgroup$
– Todd Wilcox
Aug 28 '18 at 13:19





1




1




$begingroup$
I have heard an anecdotal story on percentage increase: There was a debate on "Do law students have to study Mathematics?" The lawyer claimed it was not necessary for them. The mathematician asked him the question: "Last year there were $80$ crimes, this year there were $100$ crimes. How much percentage increase is this?" The lawyer quickly and with confidence replied "$20$ percent"... The moral of the story is the mathematics is necessary for each and every subject and profession.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Aug 28 '18 at 14:31





$begingroup$
I have heard an anecdotal story on percentage increase: There was a debate on "Do law students have to study Mathematics?" The lawyer claimed it was not necessary for them. The mathematician asked him the question: "Last year there were $80$ crimes, this year there were $100$ crimes. How much percentage increase is this?" The lawyer quickly and with confidence replied "$20$ percent"... The moral of the story is the mathematics is necessary for each and every subject and profession.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Aug 28 '18 at 14:31











6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















69












$begingroup$

Percentage increase is $$fractextnew number - old numbertextold numbertimes 100 %$$



The right comptuation should be $$frac200-5050 times 100 %=300%$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    78












    $begingroup$

    If something increases from $50$ to $200$, it increases by $300%$ and has a new value that is $400%$ of the old value.



    Similarly, if something increases from $50$ to $52$, it increases by $4%$ to a new value that is $104%$ of the old one.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      13












      $begingroup$

      The convention is that "percentage increase" is the number of percentage points that are added.



      So it is assumed that you always start with $100%$ of a number and then add an $n%$ percent increase to that, so you end up with $(100 + n)%$ of the original number.



      If you take the ratio of the starting and ending amounts and multiply by $100%,$
      you end up with the figure $(100 + n)%.$ You then have to subtract $100%$ if what you want is the percentage increase.



      Indeed $52$ is $104%$ of $50,$ but the added amount is only $2,$ which is $4%$ of $50.$
      Likewise $200$ is $400%$ of $50,$ but the added amount is only $150,$ which is $300%$ of $50.$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        7












        $begingroup$

        You are making the classic mistake of confusing ratio with change.



        $ratio = fracnew;valueold;value$



        $percentage;ratio = fracnew;valueold;value times 100%$



        $difference = new;value - old;value$



        $percentage;change = fracdifferenceold;value times 100% = fracnew;value - old;valueold;value times 100%$



        Change is more commonly known as growth or increase.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




















          2












          $begingroup$

          This is were the ratio makes more sense



          That is when



          50:400



          are divided one both sides by 50 giving us



          1:8



          so my understanding is that it is eight times more.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            50/400 reduces to 1/8 not 1/4
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Paff
            Jan 31 at 13:28










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you - applied your correction. Peter Paff.
            $endgroup$
            – Brahm Bothma
            Feb 6 at 14:19


















          1












          $begingroup$

          If you see your question, you'll see that you have answered it yourself. In the second statement, you said 50 to 52 increment means 4% which is equal to 100 subtracted from 104 which you have calculated. Similarly, if you subtract 100 from 400 you will get 300%.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



















            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes








            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            69












            $begingroup$

            Percentage increase is $$fractextnew number - old numbertextold numbertimes 100 %$$



            The right comptuation should be $$frac200-5050 times 100 %=300%$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              69












              $begingroup$

              Percentage increase is $$fractextnew number - old numbertextold numbertimes 100 %$$



              The right comptuation should be $$frac200-5050 times 100 %=300%$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                69












                69








                69





                $begingroup$

                Percentage increase is $$fractextnew number - old numbertextold numbertimes 100 %$$



                The right comptuation should be $$frac200-5050 times 100 %=300%$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Percentage increase is $$fractextnew number - old numbertextold numbertimes 100 %$$



                The right comptuation should be $$frac200-5050 times 100 %=300%$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Aug 28 '18 at 6:56









                Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh

                103k1468119




                103k1468119





















                    78












                    $begingroup$

                    If something increases from $50$ to $200$, it increases by $300%$ and has a new value that is $400%$ of the old value.



                    Similarly, if something increases from $50$ to $52$, it increases by $4%$ to a new value that is $104%$ of the old one.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$

















                      78












                      $begingroup$

                      If something increases from $50$ to $200$, it increases by $300%$ and has a new value that is $400%$ of the old value.



                      Similarly, if something increases from $50$ to $52$, it increases by $4%$ to a new value that is $104%$ of the old one.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$















                        78












                        78








                        78





                        $begingroup$

                        If something increases from $50$ to $200$, it increases by $300%$ and has a new value that is $400%$ of the old value.



                        Similarly, if something increases from $50$ to $52$, it increases by $4%$ to a new value that is $104%$ of the old one.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        If something increases from $50$ to $200$, it increases by $300%$ and has a new value that is $400%$ of the old value.



                        Similarly, if something increases from $50$ to $52$, it increases by $4%$ to a new value that is $104%$ of the old one.







                        share|cite|improve this answer












                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        answered Aug 28 '18 at 7:11









                        5xum5xum

                        91.5k394161




                        91.5k394161





















                            13












                            $begingroup$

                            The convention is that "percentage increase" is the number of percentage points that are added.



                            So it is assumed that you always start with $100%$ of a number and then add an $n%$ percent increase to that, so you end up with $(100 + n)%$ of the original number.



                            If you take the ratio of the starting and ending amounts and multiply by $100%,$
                            you end up with the figure $(100 + n)%.$ You then have to subtract $100%$ if what you want is the percentage increase.



                            Indeed $52$ is $104%$ of $50,$ but the added amount is only $2,$ which is $4%$ of $50.$
                            Likewise $200$ is $400%$ of $50,$ but the added amount is only $150,$ which is $300%$ of $50.$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$

















                              13












                              $begingroup$

                              The convention is that "percentage increase" is the number of percentage points that are added.



                              So it is assumed that you always start with $100%$ of a number and then add an $n%$ percent increase to that, so you end up with $(100 + n)%$ of the original number.



                              If you take the ratio of the starting and ending amounts and multiply by $100%,$
                              you end up with the figure $(100 + n)%.$ You then have to subtract $100%$ if what you want is the percentage increase.



                              Indeed $52$ is $104%$ of $50,$ but the added amount is only $2,$ which is $4%$ of $50.$
                              Likewise $200$ is $400%$ of $50,$ but the added amount is only $150,$ which is $300%$ of $50.$






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$















                                13












                                13








                                13





                                $begingroup$

                                The convention is that "percentage increase" is the number of percentage points that are added.



                                So it is assumed that you always start with $100%$ of a number and then add an $n%$ percent increase to that, so you end up with $(100 + n)%$ of the original number.



                                If you take the ratio of the starting and ending amounts and multiply by $100%,$
                                you end up with the figure $(100 + n)%.$ You then have to subtract $100%$ if what you want is the percentage increase.



                                Indeed $52$ is $104%$ of $50,$ but the added amount is only $2,$ which is $4%$ of $50.$
                                Likewise $200$ is $400%$ of $50,$ but the added amount is only $150,$ which is $300%$ of $50.$






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



                                The convention is that "percentage increase" is the number of percentage points that are added.



                                So it is assumed that you always start with $100%$ of a number and then add an $n%$ percent increase to that, so you end up with $(100 + n)%$ of the original number.



                                If you take the ratio of the starting and ending amounts and multiply by $100%,$
                                you end up with the figure $(100 + n)%.$ You then have to subtract $100%$ if what you want is the percentage increase.



                                Indeed $52$ is $104%$ of $50,$ but the added amount is only $2,$ which is $4%$ of $50.$
                                Likewise $200$ is $400%$ of $50,$ but the added amount is only $150,$ which is $300%$ of $50.$







                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                answered Aug 28 '18 at 13:57









                                David KDavid K

                                55.3k344120




                                55.3k344120





















                                    7












                                    $begingroup$

                                    You are making the classic mistake of confusing ratio with change.



                                    $ratio = fracnew;valueold;value$



                                    $percentage;ratio = fracnew;valueold;value times 100%$



                                    $difference = new;value - old;value$



                                    $percentage;change = fracdifferenceold;value times 100% = fracnew;value - old;valueold;value times 100%$



                                    Change is more commonly known as growth or increase.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$

















                                      7












                                      $begingroup$

                                      You are making the classic mistake of confusing ratio with change.



                                      $ratio = fracnew;valueold;value$



                                      $percentage;ratio = fracnew;valueold;value times 100%$



                                      $difference = new;value - old;value$



                                      $percentage;change = fracdifferenceold;value times 100% = fracnew;value - old;valueold;value times 100%$



                                      Change is more commonly known as growth or increase.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$















                                        7












                                        7








                                        7





                                        $begingroup$

                                        You are making the classic mistake of confusing ratio with change.



                                        $ratio = fracnew;valueold;value$



                                        $percentage;ratio = fracnew;valueold;value times 100%$



                                        $difference = new;value - old;value$



                                        $percentage;change = fracdifferenceold;value times 100% = fracnew;value - old;valueold;value times 100%$



                                        Change is more commonly known as growth or increase.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer









                                        $endgroup$



                                        You are making the classic mistake of confusing ratio with change.



                                        $ratio = fracnew;valueold;value$



                                        $percentage;ratio = fracnew;valueold;value times 100%$



                                        $difference = new;value - old;value$



                                        $percentage;change = fracdifferenceold;value times 100% = fracnew;value - old;valueold;value times 100%$



                                        Change is more commonly known as growth or increase.







                                        share|cite|improve this answer












                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer










                                        answered Aug 28 '18 at 14:26









                                        Peter PaffPeter Paff

                                        1812




                                        1812





















                                            2












                                            $begingroup$

                                            This is were the ratio makes more sense



                                            That is when



                                            50:400



                                            are divided one both sides by 50 giving us



                                            1:8



                                            so my understanding is that it is eight times more.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$








                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              50/400 reduces to 1/8 not 1/4
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Peter Paff
                                              Jan 31 at 13:28










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Thank you - applied your correction. Peter Paff.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Brahm Bothma
                                              Feb 6 at 14:19















                                            2












                                            $begingroup$

                                            This is were the ratio makes more sense



                                            That is when



                                            50:400



                                            are divided one both sides by 50 giving us



                                            1:8



                                            so my understanding is that it is eight times more.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$








                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              50/400 reduces to 1/8 not 1/4
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Peter Paff
                                              Jan 31 at 13:28










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Thank you - applied your correction. Peter Paff.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Brahm Bothma
                                              Feb 6 at 14:19













                                            2












                                            2








                                            2





                                            $begingroup$

                                            This is were the ratio makes more sense



                                            That is when



                                            50:400



                                            are divided one both sides by 50 giving us



                                            1:8



                                            so my understanding is that it is eight times more.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$



                                            This is were the ratio makes more sense



                                            That is when



                                            50:400



                                            are divided one both sides by 50 giving us



                                            1:8



                                            so my understanding is that it is eight times more.







                                            share|cite|improve this answer














                                            share|cite|improve this answer



                                            share|cite|improve this answer








                                            edited Feb 6 at 14:18

























                                            answered Aug 29 '18 at 4:03









                                            Brahm BothmaBrahm Bothma

                                            215




                                            215







                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              50/400 reduces to 1/8 not 1/4
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Peter Paff
                                              Jan 31 at 13:28










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Thank you - applied your correction. Peter Paff.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Brahm Bothma
                                              Feb 6 at 14:19












                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              50/400 reduces to 1/8 not 1/4
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Peter Paff
                                              Jan 31 at 13:28










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Thank you - applied your correction. Peter Paff.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Brahm Bothma
                                              Feb 6 at 14:19







                                            1




                                            1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            50/400 reduces to 1/8 not 1/4
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Peter Paff
                                            Jan 31 at 13:28




                                            $begingroup$
                                            50/400 reduces to 1/8 not 1/4
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Peter Paff
                                            Jan 31 at 13:28












                                            $begingroup$
                                            Thank you - applied your correction. Peter Paff.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Brahm Bothma
                                            Feb 6 at 14:19




                                            $begingroup$
                                            Thank you - applied your correction. Peter Paff.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Brahm Bothma
                                            Feb 6 at 14:19











                                            1












                                            $begingroup$

                                            If you see your question, you'll see that you have answered it yourself. In the second statement, you said 50 to 52 increment means 4% which is equal to 100 subtracted from 104 which you have calculated. Similarly, if you subtract 100 from 400 you will get 300%.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$

















                                              1












                                              $begingroup$

                                              If you see your question, you'll see that you have answered it yourself. In the second statement, you said 50 to 52 increment means 4% which is equal to 100 subtracted from 104 which you have calculated. Similarly, if you subtract 100 from 400 you will get 300%.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$















                                                1












                                                1








                                                1





                                                $begingroup$

                                                If you see your question, you'll see that you have answered it yourself. In the second statement, you said 50 to 52 increment means 4% which is equal to 100 subtracted from 104 which you have calculated. Similarly, if you subtract 100 from 400 you will get 300%.






                                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                                $endgroup$



                                                If you see your question, you'll see that you have answered it yourself. In the second statement, you said 50 to 52 increment means 4% which is equal to 100 subtracted from 104 which you have calculated. Similarly, if you subtract 100 from 400 you will get 300%.







                                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                                answered Aug 28 '18 at 18:52









                                                DeveshDevesh

                                                211




                                                211













                                                    kaSAE,hJ tP18kegIysg7,xfL,bLUFDa,Ex at4,s42l
                                                    G,NIKj055aFKF5v1iqhv7Bh MR,PT7k,vzEtPJHqwyz,LVFaGU

                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    Old paper Canadian currency

                                                    𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

                                                    ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế