CCM_Application User available software missing
While querying the namespace rootccmclientsdk class ccm_application I've found that it'll contain objects for any triggered application installs and not user available applications.
Has anyone found a way around this?
wmi sccm
asked Nov 13 '18 at 8:08
Nigel TatschnerNigel Tatschner
105
add a comment |
While querying the namespace rootccmclientsdk class ccm_application I've found that it'll contain objects for any triggered application installs and not user available applications.
Has anyone found a way around this?
wmi sccm
asked Nov 13 '18 at 8:08
Nigel TatschnerNigel Tatschner
105
I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?
– Syberdoor
Nov 13 '18 at 15:05
I really don't think you understand or even read my question..
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:25
add a comment |
While querying the namespace rootccmclientsdk class ccm_application I've found that it'll contain objects for any triggered application installs and not user available applications.
Has anyone found a way around this?
wmi sccm
asked Nov 13 '18 at 8:08
Nigel TatschnerNigel Tatschner
105
While querying the namespace rootccmclientsdk class ccm_application I've found that it'll contain objects for any triggered application installs and not user available applications.
Has anyone found a way around this?
wmi sccm
wmi sccm
asked Nov 13 '18 at 8:08
Nigel TatschnerNigel Tatschner
105
asked Nov 13 '18 at 8:08
Nigel TatschnerNigel Tatschner
105
asked Nov 13 '18 at 8:08
Nigel TatschnerNigel Tatschner
105
asked Nov 13 '18 at 8:08
Nigel TatschnerNigel Tatschner
105
asked Nov 13 '18 at 8:08
Nigel TatschnerNigel Tatschner
105
105
I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?
– Syberdoor
Nov 13 '18 at 15:05
I really don't think you understand or even read my question..
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:25
add a comment |
I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?
– Syberdoor
Nov 13 '18 at 15:05
I really don't think you understand or even read my question..
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:25
I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?
– Syberdoor
Nov 13 '18 at 15:05
I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?
– Syberdoor
Nov 13 '18 at 15:05
I really don't think you understand or even read my question..
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:25
I really don't think you understand or even read my question..
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:25
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
From what you're saying I think this is by design with SCCM, but may be different in the more recent windows 10 versions.
What I've seen with it is that applications made available to a User collection don't seem to appear in the local client classes. This makes sense because the target of the deployment isn't the machine. Deployments made available to User Collections only seem to appear through the webservices used by the application Catalog if you have that setup.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:27
Shovers_Shovers_
377110
Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 13 '18 at 21:06
Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 8:33
There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though
– Shovers_
Nov 14 '18 at 9:52
You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 10:05
Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:27
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53276451%2fccm-application-user-available-software-missing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From what you're saying I think this is by design with SCCM, but may be different in the more recent windows 10 versions.
What I've seen with it is that applications made available to a User collection don't seem to appear in the local client classes. This makes sense because the target of the deployment isn't the machine. Deployments made available to User Collections only seem to appear through the webservices used by the application Catalog if you have that setup.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:27
Shovers_Shovers_
377110
Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 13 '18 at 21:06
Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 8:33
There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though
– Shovers_
Nov 14 '18 at 9:52
You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 10:05
Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:27
add a comment |
From what you're saying I think this is by design with SCCM, but may be different in the more recent windows 10 versions.
What I've seen with it is that applications made available to a User collection don't seem to appear in the local client classes. This makes sense because the target of the deployment isn't the machine. Deployments made available to User Collections only seem to appear through the webservices used by the application Catalog if you have that setup.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:27
Shovers_Shovers_
377110
Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 13 '18 at 21:06
Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 8:33
There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though
– Shovers_
Nov 14 '18 at 9:52
You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 10:05
Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:27
add a comment |
From what you're saying I think this is by design with SCCM, but may be different in the more recent windows 10 versions.
What I've seen with it is that applications made available to a User collection don't seem to appear in the local client classes. This makes sense because the target of the deployment isn't the machine. Deployments made available to User Collections only seem to appear through the webservices used by the application Catalog if you have that setup.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:27
Shovers_Shovers_
377110
From what you're saying I think this is by design with SCCM, but may be different in the more recent windows 10 versions.
What I've seen with it is that applications made available to a User collection don't seem to appear in the local client classes. This makes sense because the target of the deployment isn't the machine. Deployments made available to User Collections only seem to appear through the webservices used by the application Catalog if you have that setup.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:27
Shovers_Shovers_
377110
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:27
Shovers_Shovers_
377110
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:27
Shovers_Shovers_
377110
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:27
Shovers_Shovers_
377110
377110
Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 13 '18 at 21:06
Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 8:33
There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though
– Shovers_
Nov 14 '18 at 9:52
You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 10:05
Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:27
add a comment |
Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 13 '18 at 21:06
Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 8:33
There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though
– Shovers_
Nov 14 '18 at 9:52
You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 10:05
Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:27
Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 13 '18 at 21:06
Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 13 '18 at 21:06
Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 8:33
Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 8:33
There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though
– Shovers_
Nov 14 '18 at 9:52
There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though
– Shovers_
Nov 14 '18 at 9:52
You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 10:05
You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution
– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 10:05
Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:27
Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53276451%2fccm-application-user-available-software-missing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?
– Syberdoor
Nov 13 '18 at 15:05
I really don't think you understand or even read my question..
– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:25