CCM_Application User available software missing










0















While querying the namespace rootccmclientsdk class ccm_application I've found that it'll contain objects for any triggered application installs and not user available applications.
Has anyone found a way around this?










share|improve this question






















  • I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 13 '18 at 15:05











  • I really don't think you understand or even read my question..

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:25















0















While querying the namespace rootccmclientsdk class ccm_application I've found that it'll contain objects for any triggered application installs and not user available applications.
Has anyone found a way around this?










share|improve this question






















  • I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 13 '18 at 15:05











  • I really don't think you understand or even read my question..

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:25













0












0








0








While querying the namespace rootccmclientsdk class ccm_application I've found that it'll contain objects for any triggered application installs and not user available applications.
Has anyone found a way around this?










share|improve this question














While querying the namespace rootccmclientsdk class ccm_application I've found that it'll contain objects for any triggered application installs and not user available applications.
Has anyone found a way around this?







wmi sccm






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 13 '18 at 8:08









Nigel TatschnerNigel Tatschner

105




105












  • I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 13 '18 at 15:05











  • I really don't think you understand or even read my question..

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:25

















  • I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 13 '18 at 15:05











  • I really don't think you understand or even read my question..

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:25
















I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?

– Syberdoor
Nov 13 '18 at 15:05





I don't have experience with this but are you really checking with the correct user here? Is it possible that you check this with some admin who does not have the application deployed to?

– Syberdoor
Nov 13 '18 at 15:05













I really don't think you understand or even read my question..

– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:25





I really don't think you understand or even read my question..

– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:25












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














From what you're saying I think this is by design with SCCM, but may be different in the more recent windows 10 versions.



What I've seen with it is that applications made available to a User collection don't seem to appear in the local client classes. This makes sense because the target of the deployment isn't the machine. Deployments made available to User Collections only seem to appear through the webservices used by the application Catalog if you have that setup.






share|improve this answer























  • Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 13 '18 at 21:06











  • Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 14 '18 at 8:33











  • There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though

    – Shovers_
    Nov 14 '18 at 9:52











  • You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:05











  • Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:27










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53276451%2fccm-application-user-available-software-missing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














From what you're saying I think this is by design with SCCM, but may be different in the more recent windows 10 versions.



What I've seen with it is that applications made available to a User collection don't seem to appear in the local client classes. This makes sense because the target of the deployment isn't the machine. Deployments made available to User Collections only seem to appear through the webservices used by the application Catalog if you have that setup.






share|improve this answer























  • Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 13 '18 at 21:06











  • Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 14 '18 at 8:33











  • There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though

    – Shovers_
    Nov 14 '18 at 9:52











  • You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:05











  • Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:27















0














From what you're saying I think this is by design with SCCM, but may be different in the more recent windows 10 versions.



What I've seen with it is that applications made available to a User collection don't seem to appear in the local client classes. This makes sense because the target of the deployment isn't the machine. Deployments made available to User Collections only seem to appear through the webservices used by the application Catalog if you have that setup.






share|improve this answer























  • Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 13 '18 at 21:06











  • Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 14 '18 at 8:33











  • There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though

    – Shovers_
    Nov 14 '18 at 9:52











  • You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:05











  • Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:27













0












0








0







From what you're saying I think this is by design with SCCM, but may be different in the more recent windows 10 versions.



What I've seen with it is that applications made available to a User collection don't seem to appear in the local client classes. This makes sense because the target of the deployment isn't the machine. Deployments made available to User Collections only seem to appear through the webservices used by the application Catalog if you have that setup.






share|improve this answer













From what you're saying I think this is by design with SCCM, but may be different in the more recent windows 10 versions.



What I've seen with it is that applications made available to a User collection don't seem to appear in the local client classes. This makes sense because the target of the deployment isn't the machine. Deployments made available to User Collections only seem to appear through the webservices used by the application Catalog if you have that setup.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:27









Shovers_Shovers_

377110




377110












  • Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 13 '18 at 21:06











  • Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 14 '18 at 8:33











  • There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though

    – Shovers_
    Nov 14 '18 at 9:52











  • You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:05











  • Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:27

















  • Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 13 '18 at 21:06











  • Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 14 '18 at 8:33











  • There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though

    – Shovers_
    Nov 14 '18 at 9:52











  • You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution

    – Syberdoor
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:05











  • Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...

    – Nigel Tatschner
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:27
















Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install

– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 13 '18 at 21:06





Defiantly by design, looking at it you can worry the primary site server for the logged on user advertisements, just need to confirm if you can force an install

– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 13 '18 at 21:06













Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?

– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 8:33





Why force an install of an available application? If it needs to be installed why not set it to required?

– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 8:33













There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though

– Shovers_
Nov 14 '18 at 9:52





There could be scenarios where you'd want something to be available and then trigger it at a specific time. Few and far between though

– Shovers_
Nov 14 '18 at 9:52













You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution

– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 10:05





You still can make a second deployment for the same thing and make it required. I mean I have seen lots of crazy scenarios with sccm that forced you to do stuff you shouldn't have to so I have no doubt there could be a plausible scenario for that (e.g. I have heard of people that need to mass trigger something but don't even have access to sccm because that is a different department). I was more like 50% curious what the motivation might be and 50% trying to hint that this might also maybe be a situation where there is normally a better solution

– Syberdoor
Nov 14 '18 at 10:05













Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...

– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:27





Why are you asking why I'm doing it? I'm asking for help to active a goal...

– Nigel Tatschner
Nov 14 '18 at 10:27



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53276451%2fccm-application-user-available-software-missing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Crossroads (UK TV series)

ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế