Delete property in referenced JS object

Delete property in referenced JS object



Let's say I want to delete a property in a JS object




const source =
nestA:
nestB:
nestC: 'deleteMe'



const clone =
clone.nestA = ...source.nestA
delete clone.nestA.nestB
console.log(source)



execute above script

expect: source remain untouched

actual: source will become


source


source




However, if I just do delete clone.nestA, source will remain untouched as expected


delete clone.nestA


source



Question: How come delete clone.nestA.nestB affect source. But delete clone.nestA doesn't?


delete clone.nestA.nestB


source


delete clone.nestA






...source.nestA makes no sense, you could (should) just use source.nestA.

– Bergi
Sep 10 '18 at 20:21



...source.nestA


source.nestA






The spread syntax assignment does not make a deep copy.

– Pointy
Sep 10 '18 at 20:22






What is your question? Do you understand why this happens?

– Bergi
Sep 10 '18 at 20:24






What is the difference between a deep copy and a shallow copy?

– Felix Kling
Sep 10 '18 at 20:30






In Version 69.0.3497.81 (Official Build) (64-bit) on Windows 10, source is nestA: , not .

– Heretic Monkey
Sep 10 '18 at 20:34


source


nestA:





2 Answers
2



How come delete clone.nestA.nestB affects source, but delete clone.nestA doesn't?


delete clone.nestA.nestB


source


delete clone.nestA



source and clone are distinct objects. A third object is referenced from both the source.nestA property and the clone.nestA property. (Another object is on the nestB property of that).


source


clone


source.nestA


clone.nestA


nestB



When you delete a property on source, like the source.nestA property, you only affect the source object.


source


source.nestA


source



When you delete a property on the third object, like source.nestA.nestB or clone.nestA.nestB (which is the same property on the same object), you only affect that third object. It's just that both source and clone now reference that object which misses a property.


source.nestA.nestB


clone.nestA.nestB


source


clone



You can use assign method of objects to create deep copy in that way your source can be untouchable.


let deepCopy = Object.assign(,source);
// do anything with deepCopy.



Update -
It will not create a deep copy of nested object. You can use below method to create a deep copy for nested object.



let deepCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(source));



Or


function cloneObject(obj)
var clone = ;
for(var i in obj)
if(obj[i] != null && typeof(obj[i])=="object")
clone[i] = cloneObject(obj[i]);
else
clone[i] = obj[i];

return clone;



Check






Not true from what I can see. If you run this, it behaves the same way as the spread example: const source = nestA: nestB: nestC: 'deleteMe' ; const clone = Object.assign(, source); delete clone.nestA.nestB; console.log(source);

– jmcgriz
Sep 10 '18 at 20:43



const source = nestA: nestB: nestC: 'deleteMe' ; const clone = Object.assign(, source); delete clone.nestA.nestB; console.log(source);






my bad , updated the code check now

– Abhinav Kumar
Sep 11 '18 at 2:42




Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!



But avoid



To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.



Required, but never shown



Required, but never shown




By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Crossroads (UK TV series)

ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế