Check if email is digitally signed using VB.Net










1















I would like to know if it's possible, using VB.Net, to check if an e-mail is digitally signed and who is the issuer of the certificate.



Using Extended MAPI Wrapper and Cryptography I was able to get the smime.p7m attachment from an e-mail and get the certificate information out of it (including the issuer), so it seemed like everything was working. The issue is that if I send an unsigned e-mail and manually attach a smime.p7m file, it will trick the code into thinking that the e-mail is signed.



Does anyone have a solution for this? I can also use other methods like Outlook Interop.










share|improve this question




























    1















    I would like to know if it's possible, using VB.Net, to check if an e-mail is digitally signed and who is the issuer of the certificate.



    Using Extended MAPI Wrapper and Cryptography I was able to get the smime.p7m attachment from an e-mail and get the certificate information out of it (including the issuer), so it seemed like everything was working. The issue is that if I send an unsigned e-mail and manually attach a smime.p7m file, it will trick the code into thinking that the e-mail is signed.



    Does anyone have a solution for this? I can also use other methods like Outlook Interop.










    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1








      I would like to know if it's possible, using VB.Net, to check if an e-mail is digitally signed and who is the issuer of the certificate.



      Using Extended MAPI Wrapper and Cryptography I was able to get the smime.p7m attachment from an e-mail and get the certificate information out of it (including the issuer), so it seemed like everything was working. The issue is that if I send an unsigned e-mail and manually attach a smime.p7m file, it will trick the code into thinking that the e-mail is signed.



      Does anyone have a solution for this? I can also use other methods like Outlook Interop.










      share|improve this question
















      I would like to know if it's possible, using VB.Net, to check if an e-mail is digitally signed and who is the issuer of the certificate.



      Using Extended MAPI Wrapper and Cryptography I was able to get the smime.p7m attachment from an e-mail and get the certificate information out of it (including the issuer), so it seemed like everything was working. The issue is that if I send an unsigned e-mail and manually attach a smime.p7m file, it will trick the code into thinking that the e-mail is signed.



      Does anyone have a solution for this? I can also use other methods like Outlook Interop.







      vb.net outlook mapi smime






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 1 '18 at 0:02









      Blackwood

      4,042122338




      4,042122338










      asked Oct 31 '18 at 22:07









      Fabio LeonardoFabio Leonardo

      414




      414






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Outlook Object Model always tries to represent signed and encrypted messages as regular MailItem objects. The MessageClass property will return "IPM.Note". It goes as far as returning a fake IMessage object from the MailItem.MAPIOBJECT property.



          If you are using Extended MAPI, you can read the PR_MESSAGE_CLASS property and check if its value corresponds to one of the signed/encrypted message classes (e.g. "IPM.Note.SMIME.MultipartSigned"). Just make sure to unwrap the IMessage object if you are retrieving it from the MailItem.MAPIOBJECT property.



          You can also use Redemption and and its RDOEncryptedMessage object - it allows to decrypt an encrypted message using RDOEncryptedMessage.GetDecryptedMessage message as well as access the certificate properties.






          share|improve this answer






























            0














            If you have a truly signed S/MIME message, then the "smime.p7m" attachment will either have a Content-Type value of application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type=signed-data -or- it will have a Content-Type value of application/pkcs7-signature and will be the 2nd child MIME part of a multipart/signed container.



            To visualize:



            Option 1:



            Content-Type: application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type="signed-data"; name="smime.p7m"
            Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
            Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64


            Option 2:



            Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="some-bounary-string"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"

            --some-boundary-string
            Content-Type: text/plain

            This is the message content that was signed...

            --some-boundary-string
            Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7m"
            Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
            Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

            ...
            --some-boundary-string--


            I'm not familiar with the Exchange MAPI wrapper API, but there should be a way to get the Content-Type value. Depending on what that is, you can check for the other attributes I mentioned above to verify if it is actually a signed message or just an attachment.



            Note: They can also be application/x-pkcs7-mime and application/x-pkcs7-signature, but other than the leading x- of the MIME subtype, the logic is the same.






            share|improve this answer























            • But if I send a signed email and download it's smime.p7m file, it will have all this information that you said, and I can re-attach it to some other e-mail to make the code think that it's signed, I would just have to identify/modify the body part of the smime file (Content-Type: text/html) and keep the same certificate data.

              – Fabio Leonardo
              Nov 12 '18 at 11:17












            • You're not making any sense. If you take the smime.p7m signature data from 1 message and add it to another message with a different text/html content, then it won't magically become a signed message. It won't even look that way unless you create a multipart/signed container that contains the text/html and the smime.p7m data with the correct Content-Type (if you try to attach a smime.p7m file using a mail client, it'll have a Content-Type of application/octet-stream, not application/pkcs7-signature - the mail client also won't add it to a multipart/signed, it'll add it to a multipart/mixed)

              – jstedfast
              Nov 12 '18 at 13:27











            • Is it possible for someone with my level of knowledge to construct a message that will fool a client or library into thinking that a message looks signed when it isn't? Sure, but that's why you implement logic to verify the digital signature.

              – jstedfast
              Nov 12 '18 at 13:30










            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53092614%2fcheck-if-email-is-digitally-signed-using-vb-net%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Outlook Object Model always tries to represent signed and encrypted messages as regular MailItem objects. The MessageClass property will return "IPM.Note". It goes as far as returning a fake IMessage object from the MailItem.MAPIOBJECT property.



            If you are using Extended MAPI, you can read the PR_MESSAGE_CLASS property and check if its value corresponds to one of the signed/encrypted message classes (e.g. "IPM.Note.SMIME.MultipartSigned"). Just make sure to unwrap the IMessage object if you are retrieving it from the MailItem.MAPIOBJECT property.



            You can also use Redemption and and its RDOEncryptedMessage object - it allows to decrypt an encrypted message using RDOEncryptedMessage.GetDecryptedMessage message as well as access the certificate properties.






            share|improve this answer



























              1














              Outlook Object Model always tries to represent signed and encrypted messages as regular MailItem objects. The MessageClass property will return "IPM.Note". It goes as far as returning a fake IMessage object from the MailItem.MAPIOBJECT property.



              If you are using Extended MAPI, you can read the PR_MESSAGE_CLASS property and check if its value corresponds to one of the signed/encrypted message classes (e.g. "IPM.Note.SMIME.MultipartSigned"). Just make sure to unwrap the IMessage object if you are retrieving it from the MailItem.MAPIOBJECT property.



              You can also use Redemption and and its RDOEncryptedMessage object - it allows to decrypt an encrypted message using RDOEncryptedMessage.GetDecryptedMessage message as well as access the certificate properties.






              share|improve this answer

























                1












                1








                1







                Outlook Object Model always tries to represent signed and encrypted messages as regular MailItem objects. The MessageClass property will return "IPM.Note". It goes as far as returning a fake IMessage object from the MailItem.MAPIOBJECT property.



                If you are using Extended MAPI, you can read the PR_MESSAGE_CLASS property and check if its value corresponds to one of the signed/encrypted message classes (e.g. "IPM.Note.SMIME.MultipartSigned"). Just make sure to unwrap the IMessage object if you are retrieving it from the MailItem.MAPIOBJECT property.



                You can also use Redemption and and its RDOEncryptedMessage object - it allows to decrypt an encrypted message using RDOEncryptedMessage.GetDecryptedMessage message as well as access the certificate properties.






                share|improve this answer













                Outlook Object Model always tries to represent signed and encrypted messages as regular MailItem objects. The MessageClass property will return "IPM.Note". It goes as far as returning a fake IMessage object from the MailItem.MAPIOBJECT property.



                If you are using Extended MAPI, you can read the PR_MESSAGE_CLASS property and check if its value corresponds to one of the signed/encrypted message classes (e.g. "IPM.Note.SMIME.MultipartSigned"). Just make sure to unwrap the IMessage object if you are retrieving it from the MailItem.MAPIOBJECT property.



                You can also use Redemption and and its RDOEncryptedMessage object - it allows to decrypt an encrypted message using RDOEncryptedMessage.GetDecryptedMessage message as well as access the certificate properties.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Oct 31 '18 at 23:30









                Dmitry StreblechenkoDmitry Streblechenko

                42.4k32760




                42.4k32760























                    0














                    If you have a truly signed S/MIME message, then the "smime.p7m" attachment will either have a Content-Type value of application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type=signed-data -or- it will have a Content-Type value of application/pkcs7-signature and will be the 2nd child MIME part of a multipart/signed container.



                    To visualize:



                    Option 1:



                    Content-Type: application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type="signed-data"; name="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64


                    Option 2:



                    Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="some-bounary-string"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"

                    --some-boundary-string
                    Content-Type: text/plain

                    This is the message content that was signed...

                    --some-boundary-string
                    Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

                    ...
                    --some-boundary-string--


                    I'm not familiar with the Exchange MAPI wrapper API, but there should be a way to get the Content-Type value. Depending on what that is, you can check for the other attributes I mentioned above to verify if it is actually a signed message or just an attachment.



                    Note: They can also be application/x-pkcs7-mime and application/x-pkcs7-signature, but other than the leading x- of the MIME subtype, the logic is the same.






                    share|improve this answer























                    • But if I send a signed email and download it's smime.p7m file, it will have all this information that you said, and I can re-attach it to some other e-mail to make the code think that it's signed, I would just have to identify/modify the body part of the smime file (Content-Type: text/html) and keep the same certificate data.

                      – Fabio Leonardo
                      Nov 12 '18 at 11:17












                    • You're not making any sense. If you take the smime.p7m signature data from 1 message and add it to another message with a different text/html content, then it won't magically become a signed message. It won't even look that way unless you create a multipart/signed container that contains the text/html and the smime.p7m data with the correct Content-Type (if you try to attach a smime.p7m file using a mail client, it'll have a Content-Type of application/octet-stream, not application/pkcs7-signature - the mail client also won't add it to a multipart/signed, it'll add it to a multipart/mixed)

                      – jstedfast
                      Nov 12 '18 at 13:27











                    • Is it possible for someone with my level of knowledge to construct a message that will fool a client or library into thinking that a message looks signed when it isn't? Sure, but that's why you implement logic to verify the digital signature.

                      – jstedfast
                      Nov 12 '18 at 13:30















                    0














                    If you have a truly signed S/MIME message, then the "smime.p7m" attachment will either have a Content-Type value of application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type=signed-data -or- it will have a Content-Type value of application/pkcs7-signature and will be the 2nd child MIME part of a multipart/signed container.



                    To visualize:



                    Option 1:



                    Content-Type: application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type="signed-data"; name="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64


                    Option 2:



                    Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="some-bounary-string"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"

                    --some-boundary-string
                    Content-Type: text/plain

                    This is the message content that was signed...

                    --some-boundary-string
                    Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

                    ...
                    --some-boundary-string--


                    I'm not familiar with the Exchange MAPI wrapper API, but there should be a way to get the Content-Type value. Depending on what that is, you can check for the other attributes I mentioned above to verify if it is actually a signed message or just an attachment.



                    Note: They can also be application/x-pkcs7-mime and application/x-pkcs7-signature, but other than the leading x- of the MIME subtype, the logic is the same.






                    share|improve this answer























                    • But if I send a signed email and download it's smime.p7m file, it will have all this information that you said, and I can re-attach it to some other e-mail to make the code think that it's signed, I would just have to identify/modify the body part of the smime file (Content-Type: text/html) and keep the same certificate data.

                      – Fabio Leonardo
                      Nov 12 '18 at 11:17












                    • You're not making any sense. If you take the smime.p7m signature data from 1 message and add it to another message with a different text/html content, then it won't magically become a signed message. It won't even look that way unless you create a multipart/signed container that contains the text/html and the smime.p7m data with the correct Content-Type (if you try to attach a smime.p7m file using a mail client, it'll have a Content-Type of application/octet-stream, not application/pkcs7-signature - the mail client also won't add it to a multipart/signed, it'll add it to a multipart/mixed)

                      – jstedfast
                      Nov 12 '18 at 13:27











                    • Is it possible for someone with my level of knowledge to construct a message that will fool a client or library into thinking that a message looks signed when it isn't? Sure, but that's why you implement logic to verify the digital signature.

                      – jstedfast
                      Nov 12 '18 at 13:30













                    0












                    0








                    0







                    If you have a truly signed S/MIME message, then the "smime.p7m" attachment will either have a Content-Type value of application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type=signed-data -or- it will have a Content-Type value of application/pkcs7-signature and will be the 2nd child MIME part of a multipart/signed container.



                    To visualize:



                    Option 1:



                    Content-Type: application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type="signed-data"; name="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64


                    Option 2:



                    Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="some-bounary-string"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"

                    --some-boundary-string
                    Content-Type: text/plain

                    This is the message content that was signed...

                    --some-boundary-string
                    Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

                    ...
                    --some-boundary-string--


                    I'm not familiar with the Exchange MAPI wrapper API, but there should be a way to get the Content-Type value. Depending on what that is, you can check for the other attributes I mentioned above to verify if it is actually a signed message or just an attachment.



                    Note: They can also be application/x-pkcs7-mime and application/x-pkcs7-signature, but other than the leading x- of the MIME subtype, the logic is the same.






                    share|improve this answer













                    If you have a truly signed S/MIME message, then the "smime.p7m" attachment will either have a Content-Type value of application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type=signed-data -or- it will have a Content-Type value of application/pkcs7-signature and will be the 2nd child MIME part of a multipart/signed container.



                    To visualize:



                    Option 1:



                    Content-Type: application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type="signed-data"; name="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64


                    Option 2:



                    Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="some-bounary-string"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"

                    --some-boundary-string
                    Content-Type: text/plain

                    This is the message content that was signed...

                    --some-boundary-string
                    Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
                    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

                    ...
                    --some-boundary-string--


                    I'm not familiar with the Exchange MAPI wrapper API, but there should be a way to get the Content-Type value. Depending on what that is, you can check for the other attributes I mentioned above to verify if it is actually a signed message or just an attachment.



                    Note: They can also be application/x-pkcs7-mime and application/x-pkcs7-signature, but other than the leading x- of the MIME subtype, the logic is the same.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 10 '18 at 19:17









                    jstedfastjstedfast

                    18.6k15177




                    18.6k15177












                    • But if I send a signed email and download it's smime.p7m file, it will have all this information that you said, and I can re-attach it to some other e-mail to make the code think that it's signed, I would just have to identify/modify the body part of the smime file (Content-Type: text/html) and keep the same certificate data.

                      – Fabio Leonardo
                      Nov 12 '18 at 11:17












                    • You're not making any sense. If you take the smime.p7m signature data from 1 message and add it to another message with a different text/html content, then it won't magically become a signed message. It won't even look that way unless you create a multipart/signed container that contains the text/html and the smime.p7m data with the correct Content-Type (if you try to attach a smime.p7m file using a mail client, it'll have a Content-Type of application/octet-stream, not application/pkcs7-signature - the mail client also won't add it to a multipart/signed, it'll add it to a multipart/mixed)

                      – jstedfast
                      Nov 12 '18 at 13:27











                    • Is it possible for someone with my level of knowledge to construct a message that will fool a client or library into thinking that a message looks signed when it isn't? Sure, but that's why you implement logic to verify the digital signature.

                      – jstedfast
                      Nov 12 '18 at 13:30

















                    • But if I send a signed email and download it's smime.p7m file, it will have all this information that you said, and I can re-attach it to some other e-mail to make the code think that it's signed, I would just have to identify/modify the body part of the smime file (Content-Type: text/html) and keep the same certificate data.

                      – Fabio Leonardo
                      Nov 12 '18 at 11:17












                    • You're not making any sense. If you take the smime.p7m signature data from 1 message and add it to another message with a different text/html content, then it won't magically become a signed message. It won't even look that way unless you create a multipart/signed container that contains the text/html and the smime.p7m data with the correct Content-Type (if you try to attach a smime.p7m file using a mail client, it'll have a Content-Type of application/octet-stream, not application/pkcs7-signature - the mail client also won't add it to a multipart/signed, it'll add it to a multipart/mixed)

                      – jstedfast
                      Nov 12 '18 at 13:27











                    • Is it possible for someone with my level of knowledge to construct a message that will fool a client or library into thinking that a message looks signed when it isn't? Sure, but that's why you implement logic to verify the digital signature.

                      – jstedfast
                      Nov 12 '18 at 13:30
















                    But if I send a signed email and download it's smime.p7m file, it will have all this information that you said, and I can re-attach it to some other e-mail to make the code think that it's signed, I would just have to identify/modify the body part of the smime file (Content-Type: text/html) and keep the same certificate data.

                    – Fabio Leonardo
                    Nov 12 '18 at 11:17






                    But if I send a signed email and download it's smime.p7m file, it will have all this information that you said, and I can re-attach it to some other e-mail to make the code think that it's signed, I would just have to identify/modify the body part of the smime file (Content-Type: text/html) and keep the same certificate data.

                    – Fabio Leonardo
                    Nov 12 '18 at 11:17














                    You're not making any sense. If you take the smime.p7m signature data from 1 message and add it to another message with a different text/html content, then it won't magically become a signed message. It won't even look that way unless you create a multipart/signed container that contains the text/html and the smime.p7m data with the correct Content-Type (if you try to attach a smime.p7m file using a mail client, it'll have a Content-Type of application/octet-stream, not application/pkcs7-signature - the mail client also won't add it to a multipart/signed, it'll add it to a multipart/mixed)

                    – jstedfast
                    Nov 12 '18 at 13:27





                    You're not making any sense. If you take the smime.p7m signature data from 1 message and add it to another message with a different text/html content, then it won't magically become a signed message. It won't even look that way unless you create a multipart/signed container that contains the text/html and the smime.p7m data with the correct Content-Type (if you try to attach a smime.p7m file using a mail client, it'll have a Content-Type of application/octet-stream, not application/pkcs7-signature - the mail client also won't add it to a multipart/signed, it'll add it to a multipart/mixed)

                    – jstedfast
                    Nov 12 '18 at 13:27













                    Is it possible for someone with my level of knowledge to construct a message that will fool a client or library into thinking that a message looks signed when it isn't? Sure, but that's why you implement logic to verify the digital signature.

                    – jstedfast
                    Nov 12 '18 at 13:30





                    Is it possible for someone with my level of knowledge to construct a message that will fool a client or library into thinking that a message looks signed when it isn't? Sure, but that's why you implement logic to verify the digital signature.

                    – jstedfast
                    Nov 12 '18 at 13:30

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53092614%2fcheck-if-email-is-digitally-signed-using-vb-net%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

                    Crossroads (UK TV series)

                    ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế