sql save month boolean fields as integer for bitwise manipulation









up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Probably overthinking this. Issue is I've inherited a database where a member can have two (or more) addresses as part of membership (think seasonal) record (addresses are in separate records), and database actions depend on which address the member is currently located at.



Currently, each month (Jan, Feb, etc.) is a bit field. So in order to query where a member is this month (or span of months) you have to either select for the field name that matches current month (or month span for period), meaning you have to query by variable field name... or scan through the 12 fields - clumsy. Seems to me it should either be an integer field that is queried by bitwise xor operation (one for which months are flagged and one for query period), or by "adding" the field values into a string of bits converted to integer number then using bitwise comparison.



Second option would be ok (wouldn't change the table structure) but would rather use one integer field to represent a binary version of the 12 months then work with that.



In either case, been way too many years since I did much bitwise work, much less figure out how to convert into binary representation. I expect there is already a published answer somewhere, but can't find it. Any suggestions? Thanks!










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Probably overthinking this. Issue is I've inherited a database where a member can have two (or more) addresses as part of membership (think seasonal) record (addresses are in separate records), and database actions depend on which address the member is currently located at.



    Currently, each month (Jan, Feb, etc.) is a bit field. So in order to query where a member is this month (or span of months) you have to either select for the field name that matches current month (or month span for period), meaning you have to query by variable field name... or scan through the 12 fields - clumsy. Seems to me it should either be an integer field that is queried by bitwise xor operation (one for which months are flagged and one for query period), or by "adding" the field values into a string of bits converted to integer number then using bitwise comparison.



    Second option would be ok (wouldn't change the table structure) but would rather use one integer field to represent a binary version of the 12 months then work with that.



    In either case, been way too many years since I did much bitwise work, much less figure out how to convert into binary representation. I expect there is already a published answer somewhere, but can't find it. Any suggestions? Thanks!










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Probably overthinking this. Issue is I've inherited a database where a member can have two (or more) addresses as part of membership (think seasonal) record (addresses are in separate records), and database actions depend on which address the member is currently located at.



      Currently, each month (Jan, Feb, etc.) is a bit field. So in order to query where a member is this month (or span of months) you have to either select for the field name that matches current month (or month span for period), meaning you have to query by variable field name... or scan through the 12 fields - clumsy. Seems to me it should either be an integer field that is queried by bitwise xor operation (one for which months are flagged and one for query period), or by "adding" the field values into a string of bits converted to integer number then using bitwise comparison.



      Second option would be ok (wouldn't change the table structure) but would rather use one integer field to represent a binary version of the 12 months then work with that.



      In either case, been way too many years since I did much bitwise work, much less figure out how to convert into binary representation. I expect there is already a published answer somewhere, but can't find it. Any suggestions? Thanks!










      share|improve this question













      Probably overthinking this. Issue is I've inherited a database where a member can have two (or more) addresses as part of membership (think seasonal) record (addresses are in separate records), and database actions depend on which address the member is currently located at.



      Currently, each month (Jan, Feb, etc.) is a bit field. So in order to query where a member is this month (or span of months) you have to either select for the field name that matches current month (or month span for period), meaning you have to query by variable field name... or scan through the 12 fields - clumsy. Seems to me it should either be an integer field that is queried by bitwise xor operation (one for which months are flagged and one for query period), or by "adding" the field values into a string of bits converted to integer number then using bitwise comparison.



      Second option would be ok (wouldn't change the table structure) but would rather use one integer field to represent a binary version of the 12 months then work with that.



      In either case, been way too many years since I did much bitwise work, much less figure out how to convert into binary representation. I expect there is already a published answer somewhere, but can't find it. Any suggestions? Thanks!







      sql-server binary bit-manipulation






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 8 at 17:21









      Ben

      62




      62






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Since you are open to using an integer field, add a column to your table to hold the month numeric values.



          alter table myTable
          add column MonthNum int

          alter table myTable
          add constraint CK_Month_Range CHECK (MonthNum > 0 and MonthNum < 13)


          There wouldn't be any benefit of storing a bit representation of the month number in an integer field since the same amount of space will be taken up (4 bytes). Many system table use bitwise values but in this case, I don't see how it would improve anything.



          In order to check if they are there, I would probably do one of two things.



          • Use a bit value column for IsCurrent

          • Use a form of row versioning where the last updated datetime would be the current record

          Here is a bitwise type of check if your application will send in an integer for the parameter



          declare @table table (id int identity(1,1), jan bit, feb bit, mar bit, apr bit, may bit, jun bit, jul bit, aug bit, sep bit, oct bit, nov bit, [dec] bit)

          insert into @table
          values
          (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0), --aug
          (0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0), --mar
          (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1), --dec
          (1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) --jan


          declare @month int = 3

          select *, bitwise = concat(jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,[dec])
          from @table
          where charindex('1',concat(jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,[dec])) = @month


          If they are passing in strings, like 'January', then you'd just join to a lookup table.






          share|improve this answer






















          • The current structure works fine for some things. The issue gets into needing to find those records that meet the criteria of being true in one or more months (usually one) for reporting. Yes, I can hand code a query that creates a temp table for a specific month, BUT I would like to be able to query for that month field that matches the month being worked - i.e., if it's November, I need to see which member address record is in the month of November as a passed variable to the query, NOT by passing a hard coded month name value. Hope that makes sense...
            – Ben
            Nov 9 at 1:28










          • What values are in the month column? Can you provide sample data?
            – scsimon
            Nov 9 at 2:08











          • there are 12 month fields (columns), each named for the month (Jan, Feb, Mar, etc.). The field is a bit field, values are 0 and 1 - boolean.
            – Ben
            Nov 11 at 19:40










          • Oh your data is pivoted and unnormalized then. You should fix that
            – scsimon
            Nov 11 at 19:59










          • Well, not really, since the Month fields are not used EXCEPT for a couple of reports monthly. Creating a record for each month is a bit drastic for an address record! What I would prefer is using an integer for bitwise manipulation for - i.e, 12 binary places, one for each month, 0 for no, 1 for yes, with the address records having one field for that integer. Then do an xor of the report date (converted to integer) to get a result that tells the report to use that address record for the reporting date. Alternate would be to concatenate the 12 month bits into a number for the comparison.
            – Ben
            Nov 12 at 20:09











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53213039%2fsql-save-month-boolean-fields-as-integer-for-bitwise-manipulation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Since you are open to using an integer field, add a column to your table to hold the month numeric values.



          alter table myTable
          add column MonthNum int

          alter table myTable
          add constraint CK_Month_Range CHECK (MonthNum > 0 and MonthNum < 13)


          There wouldn't be any benefit of storing a bit representation of the month number in an integer field since the same amount of space will be taken up (4 bytes). Many system table use bitwise values but in this case, I don't see how it would improve anything.



          In order to check if they are there, I would probably do one of two things.



          • Use a bit value column for IsCurrent

          • Use a form of row versioning where the last updated datetime would be the current record

          Here is a bitwise type of check if your application will send in an integer for the parameter



          declare @table table (id int identity(1,1), jan bit, feb bit, mar bit, apr bit, may bit, jun bit, jul bit, aug bit, sep bit, oct bit, nov bit, [dec] bit)

          insert into @table
          values
          (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0), --aug
          (0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0), --mar
          (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1), --dec
          (1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) --jan


          declare @month int = 3

          select *, bitwise = concat(jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,[dec])
          from @table
          where charindex('1',concat(jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,[dec])) = @month


          If they are passing in strings, like 'January', then you'd just join to a lookup table.






          share|improve this answer






















          • The current structure works fine for some things. The issue gets into needing to find those records that meet the criteria of being true in one or more months (usually one) for reporting. Yes, I can hand code a query that creates a temp table for a specific month, BUT I would like to be able to query for that month field that matches the month being worked - i.e., if it's November, I need to see which member address record is in the month of November as a passed variable to the query, NOT by passing a hard coded month name value. Hope that makes sense...
            – Ben
            Nov 9 at 1:28










          • What values are in the month column? Can you provide sample data?
            – scsimon
            Nov 9 at 2:08











          • there are 12 month fields (columns), each named for the month (Jan, Feb, Mar, etc.). The field is a bit field, values are 0 and 1 - boolean.
            – Ben
            Nov 11 at 19:40










          • Oh your data is pivoted and unnormalized then. You should fix that
            – scsimon
            Nov 11 at 19:59










          • Well, not really, since the Month fields are not used EXCEPT for a couple of reports monthly. Creating a record for each month is a bit drastic for an address record! What I would prefer is using an integer for bitwise manipulation for - i.e, 12 binary places, one for each month, 0 for no, 1 for yes, with the address records having one field for that integer. Then do an xor of the report date (converted to integer) to get a result that tells the report to use that address record for the reporting date. Alternate would be to concatenate the 12 month bits into a number for the comparison.
            – Ben
            Nov 12 at 20:09















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Since you are open to using an integer field, add a column to your table to hold the month numeric values.



          alter table myTable
          add column MonthNum int

          alter table myTable
          add constraint CK_Month_Range CHECK (MonthNum > 0 and MonthNum < 13)


          There wouldn't be any benefit of storing a bit representation of the month number in an integer field since the same amount of space will be taken up (4 bytes). Many system table use bitwise values but in this case, I don't see how it would improve anything.



          In order to check if they are there, I would probably do one of two things.



          • Use a bit value column for IsCurrent

          • Use a form of row versioning where the last updated datetime would be the current record

          Here is a bitwise type of check if your application will send in an integer for the parameter



          declare @table table (id int identity(1,1), jan bit, feb bit, mar bit, apr bit, may bit, jun bit, jul bit, aug bit, sep bit, oct bit, nov bit, [dec] bit)

          insert into @table
          values
          (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0), --aug
          (0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0), --mar
          (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1), --dec
          (1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) --jan


          declare @month int = 3

          select *, bitwise = concat(jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,[dec])
          from @table
          where charindex('1',concat(jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,[dec])) = @month


          If they are passing in strings, like 'January', then you'd just join to a lookup table.






          share|improve this answer






















          • The current structure works fine for some things. The issue gets into needing to find those records that meet the criteria of being true in one or more months (usually one) for reporting. Yes, I can hand code a query that creates a temp table for a specific month, BUT I would like to be able to query for that month field that matches the month being worked - i.e., if it's November, I need to see which member address record is in the month of November as a passed variable to the query, NOT by passing a hard coded month name value. Hope that makes sense...
            – Ben
            Nov 9 at 1:28










          • What values are in the month column? Can you provide sample data?
            – scsimon
            Nov 9 at 2:08











          • there are 12 month fields (columns), each named for the month (Jan, Feb, Mar, etc.). The field is a bit field, values are 0 and 1 - boolean.
            – Ben
            Nov 11 at 19:40










          • Oh your data is pivoted and unnormalized then. You should fix that
            – scsimon
            Nov 11 at 19:59










          • Well, not really, since the Month fields are not used EXCEPT for a couple of reports monthly. Creating a record for each month is a bit drastic for an address record! What I would prefer is using an integer for bitwise manipulation for - i.e, 12 binary places, one for each month, 0 for no, 1 for yes, with the address records having one field for that integer. Then do an xor of the report date (converted to integer) to get a result that tells the report to use that address record for the reporting date. Alternate would be to concatenate the 12 month bits into a number for the comparison.
            – Ben
            Nov 12 at 20:09













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Since you are open to using an integer field, add a column to your table to hold the month numeric values.



          alter table myTable
          add column MonthNum int

          alter table myTable
          add constraint CK_Month_Range CHECK (MonthNum > 0 and MonthNum < 13)


          There wouldn't be any benefit of storing a bit representation of the month number in an integer field since the same amount of space will be taken up (4 bytes). Many system table use bitwise values but in this case, I don't see how it would improve anything.



          In order to check if they are there, I would probably do one of two things.



          • Use a bit value column for IsCurrent

          • Use a form of row versioning where the last updated datetime would be the current record

          Here is a bitwise type of check if your application will send in an integer for the parameter



          declare @table table (id int identity(1,1), jan bit, feb bit, mar bit, apr bit, may bit, jun bit, jul bit, aug bit, sep bit, oct bit, nov bit, [dec] bit)

          insert into @table
          values
          (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0), --aug
          (0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0), --mar
          (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1), --dec
          (1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) --jan


          declare @month int = 3

          select *, bitwise = concat(jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,[dec])
          from @table
          where charindex('1',concat(jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,[dec])) = @month


          If they are passing in strings, like 'January', then you'd just join to a lookup table.






          share|improve this answer














          Since you are open to using an integer field, add a column to your table to hold the month numeric values.



          alter table myTable
          add column MonthNum int

          alter table myTable
          add constraint CK_Month_Range CHECK (MonthNum > 0 and MonthNum < 13)


          There wouldn't be any benefit of storing a bit representation of the month number in an integer field since the same amount of space will be taken up (4 bytes). Many system table use bitwise values but in this case, I don't see how it would improve anything.



          In order to check if they are there, I would probably do one of two things.



          • Use a bit value column for IsCurrent

          • Use a form of row versioning where the last updated datetime would be the current record

          Here is a bitwise type of check if your application will send in an integer for the parameter



          declare @table table (id int identity(1,1), jan bit, feb bit, mar bit, apr bit, may bit, jun bit, jul bit, aug bit, sep bit, oct bit, nov bit, [dec] bit)

          insert into @table
          values
          (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0), --aug
          (0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0), --mar
          (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1), --dec
          (1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) --jan


          declare @month int = 3

          select *, bitwise = concat(jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,[dec])
          from @table
          where charindex('1',concat(jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,[dec])) = @month


          If they are passing in strings, like 'January', then you'd just join to a lookup table.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 12 at 20:25

























          answered Nov 8 at 17:34









          scsimon

          19.9k41536




          19.9k41536











          • The current structure works fine for some things. The issue gets into needing to find those records that meet the criteria of being true in one or more months (usually one) for reporting. Yes, I can hand code a query that creates a temp table for a specific month, BUT I would like to be able to query for that month field that matches the month being worked - i.e., if it's November, I need to see which member address record is in the month of November as a passed variable to the query, NOT by passing a hard coded month name value. Hope that makes sense...
            – Ben
            Nov 9 at 1:28










          • What values are in the month column? Can you provide sample data?
            – scsimon
            Nov 9 at 2:08











          • there are 12 month fields (columns), each named for the month (Jan, Feb, Mar, etc.). The field is a bit field, values are 0 and 1 - boolean.
            – Ben
            Nov 11 at 19:40










          • Oh your data is pivoted and unnormalized then. You should fix that
            – scsimon
            Nov 11 at 19:59










          • Well, not really, since the Month fields are not used EXCEPT for a couple of reports monthly. Creating a record for each month is a bit drastic for an address record! What I would prefer is using an integer for bitwise manipulation for - i.e, 12 binary places, one for each month, 0 for no, 1 for yes, with the address records having one field for that integer. Then do an xor of the report date (converted to integer) to get a result that tells the report to use that address record for the reporting date. Alternate would be to concatenate the 12 month bits into a number for the comparison.
            – Ben
            Nov 12 at 20:09

















          • The current structure works fine for some things. The issue gets into needing to find those records that meet the criteria of being true in one or more months (usually one) for reporting. Yes, I can hand code a query that creates a temp table for a specific month, BUT I would like to be able to query for that month field that matches the month being worked - i.e., if it's November, I need to see which member address record is in the month of November as a passed variable to the query, NOT by passing a hard coded month name value. Hope that makes sense...
            – Ben
            Nov 9 at 1:28










          • What values are in the month column? Can you provide sample data?
            – scsimon
            Nov 9 at 2:08











          • there are 12 month fields (columns), each named for the month (Jan, Feb, Mar, etc.). The field is a bit field, values are 0 and 1 - boolean.
            – Ben
            Nov 11 at 19:40










          • Oh your data is pivoted and unnormalized then. You should fix that
            – scsimon
            Nov 11 at 19:59










          • Well, not really, since the Month fields are not used EXCEPT for a couple of reports monthly. Creating a record for each month is a bit drastic for an address record! What I would prefer is using an integer for bitwise manipulation for - i.e, 12 binary places, one for each month, 0 for no, 1 for yes, with the address records having one field for that integer. Then do an xor of the report date (converted to integer) to get a result that tells the report to use that address record for the reporting date. Alternate would be to concatenate the 12 month bits into a number for the comparison.
            – Ben
            Nov 12 at 20:09
















          The current structure works fine for some things. The issue gets into needing to find those records that meet the criteria of being true in one or more months (usually one) for reporting. Yes, I can hand code a query that creates a temp table for a specific month, BUT I would like to be able to query for that month field that matches the month being worked - i.e., if it's November, I need to see which member address record is in the month of November as a passed variable to the query, NOT by passing a hard coded month name value. Hope that makes sense...
          – Ben
          Nov 9 at 1:28




          The current structure works fine for some things. The issue gets into needing to find those records that meet the criteria of being true in one or more months (usually one) for reporting. Yes, I can hand code a query that creates a temp table for a specific month, BUT I would like to be able to query for that month field that matches the month being worked - i.e., if it's November, I need to see which member address record is in the month of November as a passed variable to the query, NOT by passing a hard coded month name value. Hope that makes sense...
          – Ben
          Nov 9 at 1:28












          What values are in the month column? Can you provide sample data?
          – scsimon
          Nov 9 at 2:08





          What values are in the month column? Can you provide sample data?
          – scsimon
          Nov 9 at 2:08













          there are 12 month fields (columns), each named for the month (Jan, Feb, Mar, etc.). The field is a bit field, values are 0 and 1 - boolean.
          – Ben
          Nov 11 at 19:40




          there are 12 month fields (columns), each named for the month (Jan, Feb, Mar, etc.). The field is a bit field, values are 0 and 1 - boolean.
          – Ben
          Nov 11 at 19:40












          Oh your data is pivoted and unnormalized then. You should fix that
          – scsimon
          Nov 11 at 19:59




          Oh your data is pivoted and unnormalized then. You should fix that
          – scsimon
          Nov 11 at 19:59












          Well, not really, since the Month fields are not used EXCEPT for a couple of reports monthly. Creating a record for each month is a bit drastic for an address record! What I would prefer is using an integer for bitwise manipulation for - i.e, 12 binary places, one for each month, 0 for no, 1 for yes, with the address records having one field for that integer. Then do an xor of the report date (converted to integer) to get a result that tells the report to use that address record for the reporting date. Alternate would be to concatenate the 12 month bits into a number for the comparison.
          – Ben
          Nov 12 at 20:09





          Well, not really, since the Month fields are not used EXCEPT for a couple of reports monthly. Creating a record for each month is a bit drastic for an address record! What I would prefer is using an integer for bitwise manipulation for - i.e, 12 binary places, one for each month, 0 for no, 1 for yes, with the address records having one field for that integer. Then do an xor of the report date (converted to integer) to get a result that tells the report to use that address record for the reporting date. Alternate would be to concatenate the 12 month bits into a number for the comparison.
          – Ben
          Nov 12 at 20:09


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53213039%2fsql-save-month-boolean-fields-as-integer-for-bitwise-manipulation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

          How do I collapse sections of code in Visual Studio Code for Windows?

          ャフサォクコ ケウ,コ,ワ メ,ロスョノ゙,クネ,フムカヤヲニ,エコ゚ツ ウイオン゙ケワサネォキモュキォウイノンコチ゚メヌナイゥフュ,カヒウネェ ネ,ホノケ,ムュキ ッボーミュハ,チ ツス ィ メウイマヤ,゙ウチ ヅ ロ,ォジヌェ ャヌット ェ,マャ,チナエヒネソキツテ トホヲヲミーァ