What is the abelianization of $langle x,y,zmid x^2=y^2z^2rangle?$
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Let $G=langle x,y,zmid x^2=y^2z^2rangle$.
What is the abelianization of this group?
(Also, is there a general method to calculate such abelianizations?)
Update: I know how to get a presentation of the abelianization by adding relations like $xy=yx$ and so on. However is it possible to express it as a direct sum of cyclic groups as per the fundamental theorem for finitely generated abelian groups?
Thanks.
abstract-algebra group-theory abelian-groups combinatorial-group-theory
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Let $G=langle x,y,zmid x^2=y^2z^2rangle$.
What is the abelianization of this group?
(Also, is there a general method to calculate such abelianizations?)
Update: I know how to get a presentation of the abelianization by adding relations like $xy=yx$ and so on. However is it possible to express it as a direct sum of cyclic groups as per the fundamental theorem for finitely generated abelian groups?
Thanks.
abstract-algebra group-theory abelian-groups combinatorial-group-theory
2
The given group is a quotient of the free group $F_3$ on three generators; consider it how it behaves under the abelianization map $F_3 to mathbbZ^3$. (Note, for example, that $G^ab$ is the maximal abelian quotient of $G$.)
â anomaly
Aug 20 at 2:27
@anomaly Thanks. I can get a presentation of the abelianization by adding relations like $xy=yx$ and so on. However is it possible to express it as a direct sum of cyclic groups as per the fundamental theorem for finitely generated abelian groups?
â yoyostein
Aug 20 at 2:44
1
keywords: Tietze transformations
â janmarqz
Aug 20 at 3:00
1
Do you know a proof for the fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups? The one I know is very much of the flavor, "Give me a presentation for the abelian group, and I will decompose it into primitive factors" - maybe your proof does that too?
â Milo Brandt
Aug 20 at 3:12
4
@janmarqz I would say that the keywords here are not Tietze transformations, but Smith Normal Form.
â Derek Holt
Aug 20 at 7:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Let $G=langle x,y,zmid x^2=y^2z^2rangle$.
What is the abelianization of this group?
(Also, is there a general method to calculate such abelianizations?)
Update: I know how to get a presentation of the abelianization by adding relations like $xy=yx$ and so on. However is it possible to express it as a direct sum of cyclic groups as per the fundamental theorem for finitely generated abelian groups?
Thanks.
abstract-algebra group-theory abelian-groups combinatorial-group-theory
Let $G=langle x,y,zmid x^2=y^2z^2rangle$.
What is the abelianization of this group?
(Also, is there a general method to calculate such abelianizations?)
Update: I know how to get a presentation of the abelianization by adding relations like $xy=yx$ and so on. However is it possible to express it as a direct sum of cyclic groups as per the fundamental theorem for finitely generated abelian groups?
Thanks.
abstract-algebra group-theory abelian-groups combinatorial-group-theory
edited Aug 21 at 1:17
Shaun
7,43292972
7,43292972
asked Aug 20 at 2:22
yoyostein
7,46063366
7,46063366
2
The given group is a quotient of the free group $F_3$ on three generators; consider it how it behaves under the abelianization map $F_3 to mathbbZ^3$. (Note, for example, that $G^ab$ is the maximal abelian quotient of $G$.)
â anomaly
Aug 20 at 2:27
@anomaly Thanks. I can get a presentation of the abelianization by adding relations like $xy=yx$ and so on. However is it possible to express it as a direct sum of cyclic groups as per the fundamental theorem for finitely generated abelian groups?
â yoyostein
Aug 20 at 2:44
1
keywords: Tietze transformations
â janmarqz
Aug 20 at 3:00
1
Do you know a proof for the fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups? The one I know is very much of the flavor, "Give me a presentation for the abelian group, and I will decompose it into primitive factors" - maybe your proof does that too?
â Milo Brandt
Aug 20 at 3:12
4
@janmarqz I would say that the keywords here are not Tietze transformations, but Smith Normal Form.
â Derek Holt
Aug 20 at 7:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
2
The given group is a quotient of the free group $F_3$ on three generators; consider it how it behaves under the abelianization map $F_3 to mathbbZ^3$. (Note, for example, that $G^ab$ is the maximal abelian quotient of $G$.)
â anomaly
Aug 20 at 2:27
@anomaly Thanks. I can get a presentation of the abelianization by adding relations like $xy=yx$ and so on. However is it possible to express it as a direct sum of cyclic groups as per the fundamental theorem for finitely generated abelian groups?
â yoyostein
Aug 20 at 2:44
1
keywords: Tietze transformations
â janmarqz
Aug 20 at 3:00
1
Do you know a proof for the fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups? The one I know is very much of the flavor, "Give me a presentation for the abelian group, and I will decompose it into primitive factors" - maybe your proof does that too?
â Milo Brandt
Aug 20 at 3:12
4
@janmarqz I would say that the keywords here are not Tietze transformations, but Smith Normal Form.
â Derek Holt
Aug 20 at 7:08
2
2
The given group is a quotient of the free group $F_3$ on three generators; consider it how it behaves under the abelianization map $F_3 to mathbbZ^3$. (Note, for example, that $G^ab$ is the maximal abelian quotient of $G$.)
â anomaly
Aug 20 at 2:27
The given group is a quotient of the free group $F_3$ on three generators; consider it how it behaves under the abelianization map $F_3 to mathbbZ^3$. (Note, for example, that $G^ab$ is the maximal abelian quotient of $G$.)
â anomaly
Aug 20 at 2:27
@anomaly Thanks. I can get a presentation of the abelianization by adding relations like $xy=yx$ and so on. However is it possible to express it as a direct sum of cyclic groups as per the fundamental theorem for finitely generated abelian groups?
â yoyostein
Aug 20 at 2:44
@anomaly Thanks. I can get a presentation of the abelianization by adding relations like $xy=yx$ and so on. However is it possible to express it as a direct sum of cyclic groups as per the fundamental theorem for finitely generated abelian groups?
â yoyostein
Aug 20 at 2:44
1
1
keywords: Tietze transformations
â janmarqz
Aug 20 at 3:00
keywords: Tietze transformations
â janmarqz
Aug 20 at 3:00
1
1
Do you know a proof for the fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups? The one I know is very much of the flavor, "Give me a presentation for the abelian group, and I will decompose it into primitive factors" - maybe your proof does that too?
â Milo Brandt
Aug 20 at 3:12
Do you know a proof for the fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups? The one I know is very much of the flavor, "Give me a presentation for the abelian group, and I will decompose it into primitive factors" - maybe your proof does that too?
â Milo Brandt
Aug 20 at 3:12
4
4
@janmarqz I would say that the keywords here are not Tietze transformations, but Smith Normal Form.
â Derek Holt
Aug 20 at 7:08
@janmarqz I would say that the keywords here are not Tietze transformations, but Smith Normal Form.
â Derek Holt
Aug 20 at 7:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
You can rewrite your relator such that it has $0$ exponent sum in two of the generators, as the map $xmapsto xyz, ymapsto y, zmapsto z$ is a Nielsen transformation:
$$
beginalign*
langle x, y, zmid x^2=y^2z^2rangle
&conglangle x, y, zmid x^2z^-2y^-2rangle\
&conglangle x, y, zmid (xyz)^2z^-2y^-2rangle
endalign*
$$
Under the abelinisation map we then get the group:
$$
beginalign*
langle x, y, zmid (xyz)^2z^-2y^-2rangle^ab&=langle x, y, zmid x^2rangle^ab\
&cong mathbbZ^2times(mathbbZ/2mathbbZ)
endalign*
$$
This is a specific case of a more general phenomenon, where one can adapt the Euclidean algorithm to rewrite using automorphisms a word $Win F(a, b, ldots)$ such that it has zero exponent sum in all but one of the relators. For example, writing $sigma_x$ for the exponent sum of the relator word in the letter $x$:
$$
beginalign*
&langle a, bmid a^6b^8rangle&&sigma_a=6, sigma_b=8\
&conglangle a, bmid (ab^-1)^6b^8rangle&&textby applying~amapsto ab^-1, bmapsto b\
&=langle a, bmid (ab^-1)^5ab^7rangle&&sigma_a=6, sigma_b=2\
&conglangle a, bmid (a(ba^-3)^-1)^5a(ba^-3)^7rangle&&textby applying~amapsto a, bmapsto ba^-3\
&conglangle a, bmid (a^4b^-1)^5a(ba^-3)^7rangle&&sigma_a=0, sigma_b=2
endalign*
$$
You can think of this as a "non-commutative Smith normal form", but it is more useful in this context than the Smith normal form as it gives you more information than just the abelianisation. For example, it is used in the HNN-extension version of the Magnus hierarchy ($a$ is the stable letter, and the associated subgroups are free by the Freiheitssatz; see J. McCool and P. Schupp, On one relator groups and HNN extensions, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, Volume 16, Issue 2, September 1973 , pp. 249-256 doi).
1
Seems like overkill not to abelianize first and just work in the category of abelian groups.
â C Monsour
Aug 20 at 13:35
@CMonsour Probably, but this is what I did when I solved the problem :-) [Also, as I said in the post, the general idea of reducing exponent sums to $0$ has applications beyond abelianisations.]
â user1729
Aug 20 at 13:39
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
I would think of it as starting with $BbbZ^3=langle x,y,zrangle $ and then quotienting out the cyclic subgroup $langle x^-2y^2z^2rangle$. You can see easily that $x^-1yz$, $y$, and $z$ are an alternate set of generators for $G$, so you get $BbbZ^2times BbbZ/2BbbZ$ generated by $y, z,$ and $x^-1yz$ when you take the quotient.
There is no need to know anything about non-abelian groups, since you can abelianize first and then mod out by the relation. (Abelianization is just modding out by some relations, and it doesn't matter which relations you mod out first--you get to the same place in the end.)
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
If we have
$$langle x,y,z | x^-2y^2z^2=1rangle^rm ab=langle x,y,z | x^-2y^2z^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
with one of the Tietze moves
$$langle x,y,z,t | t=x^-1yz, t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
With another, now we arrange
$$langle x,y,z,t | x=yzt^-1, t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
and finally get
$$langle y,z,t | t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
which clearly is $Bbb Z+Bbb Z+Bbb Z_2$.
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
You can rewrite your relator such that it has $0$ exponent sum in two of the generators, as the map $xmapsto xyz, ymapsto y, zmapsto z$ is a Nielsen transformation:
$$
beginalign*
langle x, y, zmid x^2=y^2z^2rangle
&conglangle x, y, zmid x^2z^-2y^-2rangle\
&conglangle x, y, zmid (xyz)^2z^-2y^-2rangle
endalign*
$$
Under the abelinisation map we then get the group:
$$
beginalign*
langle x, y, zmid (xyz)^2z^-2y^-2rangle^ab&=langle x, y, zmid x^2rangle^ab\
&cong mathbbZ^2times(mathbbZ/2mathbbZ)
endalign*
$$
This is a specific case of a more general phenomenon, where one can adapt the Euclidean algorithm to rewrite using automorphisms a word $Win F(a, b, ldots)$ such that it has zero exponent sum in all but one of the relators. For example, writing $sigma_x$ for the exponent sum of the relator word in the letter $x$:
$$
beginalign*
&langle a, bmid a^6b^8rangle&&sigma_a=6, sigma_b=8\
&conglangle a, bmid (ab^-1)^6b^8rangle&&textby applying~amapsto ab^-1, bmapsto b\
&=langle a, bmid (ab^-1)^5ab^7rangle&&sigma_a=6, sigma_b=2\
&conglangle a, bmid (a(ba^-3)^-1)^5a(ba^-3)^7rangle&&textby applying~amapsto a, bmapsto ba^-3\
&conglangle a, bmid (a^4b^-1)^5a(ba^-3)^7rangle&&sigma_a=0, sigma_b=2
endalign*
$$
You can think of this as a "non-commutative Smith normal form", but it is more useful in this context than the Smith normal form as it gives you more information than just the abelianisation. For example, it is used in the HNN-extension version of the Magnus hierarchy ($a$ is the stable letter, and the associated subgroups are free by the Freiheitssatz; see J. McCool and P. Schupp, On one relator groups and HNN extensions, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, Volume 16, Issue 2, September 1973 , pp. 249-256 doi).
1
Seems like overkill not to abelianize first and just work in the category of abelian groups.
â C Monsour
Aug 20 at 13:35
@CMonsour Probably, but this is what I did when I solved the problem :-) [Also, as I said in the post, the general idea of reducing exponent sums to $0$ has applications beyond abelianisations.]
â user1729
Aug 20 at 13:39
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
You can rewrite your relator such that it has $0$ exponent sum in two of the generators, as the map $xmapsto xyz, ymapsto y, zmapsto z$ is a Nielsen transformation:
$$
beginalign*
langle x, y, zmid x^2=y^2z^2rangle
&conglangle x, y, zmid x^2z^-2y^-2rangle\
&conglangle x, y, zmid (xyz)^2z^-2y^-2rangle
endalign*
$$
Under the abelinisation map we then get the group:
$$
beginalign*
langle x, y, zmid (xyz)^2z^-2y^-2rangle^ab&=langle x, y, zmid x^2rangle^ab\
&cong mathbbZ^2times(mathbbZ/2mathbbZ)
endalign*
$$
This is a specific case of a more general phenomenon, where one can adapt the Euclidean algorithm to rewrite using automorphisms a word $Win F(a, b, ldots)$ such that it has zero exponent sum in all but one of the relators. For example, writing $sigma_x$ for the exponent sum of the relator word in the letter $x$:
$$
beginalign*
&langle a, bmid a^6b^8rangle&&sigma_a=6, sigma_b=8\
&conglangle a, bmid (ab^-1)^6b^8rangle&&textby applying~amapsto ab^-1, bmapsto b\
&=langle a, bmid (ab^-1)^5ab^7rangle&&sigma_a=6, sigma_b=2\
&conglangle a, bmid (a(ba^-3)^-1)^5a(ba^-3)^7rangle&&textby applying~amapsto a, bmapsto ba^-3\
&conglangle a, bmid (a^4b^-1)^5a(ba^-3)^7rangle&&sigma_a=0, sigma_b=2
endalign*
$$
You can think of this as a "non-commutative Smith normal form", but it is more useful in this context than the Smith normal form as it gives you more information than just the abelianisation. For example, it is used in the HNN-extension version of the Magnus hierarchy ($a$ is the stable letter, and the associated subgroups are free by the Freiheitssatz; see J. McCool and P. Schupp, On one relator groups and HNN extensions, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, Volume 16, Issue 2, September 1973 , pp. 249-256 doi).
1
Seems like overkill not to abelianize first and just work in the category of abelian groups.
â C Monsour
Aug 20 at 13:35
@CMonsour Probably, but this is what I did when I solved the problem :-) [Also, as I said in the post, the general idea of reducing exponent sums to $0$ has applications beyond abelianisations.]
â user1729
Aug 20 at 13:39
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
You can rewrite your relator such that it has $0$ exponent sum in two of the generators, as the map $xmapsto xyz, ymapsto y, zmapsto z$ is a Nielsen transformation:
$$
beginalign*
langle x, y, zmid x^2=y^2z^2rangle
&conglangle x, y, zmid x^2z^-2y^-2rangle\
&conglangle x, y, zmid (xyz)^2z^-2y^-2rangle
endalign*
$$
Under the abelinisation map we then get the group:
$$
beginalign*
langle x, y, zmid (xyz)^2z^-2y^-2rangle^ab&=langle x, y, zmid x^2rangle^ab\
&cong mathbbZ^2times(mathbbZ/2mathbbZ)
endalign*
$$
This is a specific case of a more general phenomenon, where one can adapt the Euclidean algorithm to rewrite using automorphisms a word $Win F(a, b, ldots)$ such that it has zero exponent sum in all but one of the relators. For example, writing $sigma_x$ for the exponent sum of the relator word in the letter $x$:
$$
beginalign*
&langle a, bmid a^6b^8rangle&&sigma_a=6, sigma_b=8\
&conglangle a, bmid (ab^-1)^6b^8rangle&&textby applying~amapsto ab^-1, bmapsto b\
&=langle a, bmid (ab^-1)^5ab^7rangle&&sigma_a=6, sigma_b=2\
&conglangle a, bmid (a(ba^-3)^-1)^5a(ba^-3)^7rangle&&textby applying~amapsto a, bmapsto ba^-3\
&conglangle a, bmid (a^4b^-1)^5a(ba^-3)^7rangle&&sigma_a=0, sigma_b=2
endalign*
$$
You can think of this as a "non-commutative Smith normal form", but it is more useful in this context than the Smith normal form as it gives you more information than just the abelianisation. For example, it is used in the HNN-extension version of the Magnus hierarchy ($a$ is the stable letter, and the associated subgroups are free by the Freiheitssatz; see J. McCool and P. Schupp, On one relator groups and HNN extensions, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, Volume 16, Issue 2, September 1973 , pp. 249-256 doi).
You can rewrite your relator such that it has $0$ exponent sum in two of the generators, as the map $xmapsto xyz, ymapsto y, zmapsto z$ is a Nielsen transformation:
$$
beginalign*
langle x, y, zmid x^2=y^2z^2rangle
&conglangle x, y, zmid x^2z^-2y^-2rangle\
&conglangle x, y, zmid (xyz)^2z^-2y^-2rangle
endalign*
$$
Under the abelinisation map we then get the group:
$$
beginalign*
langle x, y, zmid (xyz)^2z^-2y^-2rangle^ab&=langle x, y, zmid x^2rangle^ab\
&cong mathbbZ^2times(mathbbZ/2mathbbZ)
endalign*
$$
This is a specific case of a more general phenomenon, where one can adapt the Euclidean algorithm to rewrite using automorphisms a word $Win F(a, b, ldots)$ such that it has zero exponent sum in all but one of the relators. For example, writing $sigma_x$ for the exponent sum of the relator word in the letter $x$:
$$
beginalign*
&langle a, bmid a^6b^8rangle&&sigma_a=6, sigma_b=8\
&conglangle a, bmid (ab^-1)^6b^8rangle&&textby applying~amapsto ab^-1, bmapsto b\
&=langle a, bmid (ab^-1)^5ab^7rangle&&sigma_a=6, sigma_b=2\
&conglangle a, bmid (a(ba^-3)^-1)^5a(ba^-3)^7rangle&&textby applying~amapsto a, bmapsto ba^-3\
&conglangle a, bmid (a^4b^-1)^5a(ba^-3)^7rangle&&sigma_a=0, sigma_b=2
endalign*
$$
You can think of this as a "non-commutative Smith normal form", but it is more useful in this context than the Smith normal form as it gives you more information than just the abelianisation. For example, it is used in the HNN-extension version of the Magnus hierarchy ($a$ is the stable letter, and the associated subgroups are free by the Freiheitssatz; see J. McCool and P. Schupp, On one relator groups and HNN extensions, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, Volume 16, Issue 2, September 1973 , pp. 249-256 doi).
edited Aug 21 at 8:35
answered Aug 20 at 8:40
user1729
16.8k64082
16.8k64082
1
Seems like overkill not to abelianize first and just work in the category of abelian groups.
â C Monsour
Aug 20 at 13:35
@CMonsour Probably, but this is what I did when I solved the problem :-) [Also, as I said in the post, the general idea of reducing exponent sums to $0$ has applications beyond abelianisations.]
â user1729
Aug 20 at 13:39
add a comment |Â
1
Seems like overkill not to abelianize first and just work in the category of abelian groups.
â C Monsour
Aug 20 at 13:35
@CMonsour Probably, but this is what I did when I solved the problem :-) [Also, as I said in the post, the general idea of reducing exponent sums to $0$ has applications beyond abelianisations.]
â user1729
Aug 20 at 13:39
1
1
Seems like overkill not to abelianize first and just work in the category of abelian groups.
â C Monsour
Aug 20 at 13:35
Seems like overkill not to abelianize first and just work in the category of abelian groups.
â C Monsour
Aug 20 at 13:35
@CMonsour Probably, but this is what I did when I solved the problem :-) [Also, as I said in the post, the general idea of reducing exponent sums to $0$ has applications beyond abelianisations.]
â user1729
Aug 20 at 13:39
@CMonsour Probably, but this is what I did when I solved the problem :-) [Also, as I said in the post, the general idea of reducing exponent sums to $0$ has applications beyond abelianisations.]
â user1729
Aug 20 at 13:39
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
I would think of it as starting with $BbbZ^3=langle x,y,zrangle $ and then quotienting out the cyclic subgroup $langle x^-2y^2z^2rangle$. You can see easily that $x^-1yz$, $y$, and $z$ are an alternate set of generators for $G$, so you get $BbbZ^2times BbbZ/2BbbZ$ generated by $y, z,$ and $x^-1yz$ when you take the quotient.
There is no need to know anything about non-abelian groups, since you can abelianize first and then mod out by the relation. (Abelianization is just modding out by some relations, and it doesn't matter which relations you mod out first--you get to the same place in the end.)
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
I would think of it as starting with $BbbZ^3=langle x,y,zrangle $ and then quotienting out the cyclic subgroup $langle x^-2y^2z^2rangle$. You can see easily that $x^-1yz$, $y$, and $z$ are an alternate set of generators for $G$, so you get $BbbZ^2times BbbZ/2BbbZ$ generated by $y, z,$ and $x^-1yz$ when you take the quotient.
There is no need to know anything about non-abelian groups, since you can abelianize first and then mod out by the relation. (Abelianization is just modding out by some relations, and it doesn't matter which relations you mod out first--you get to the same place in the end.)
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
I would think of it as starting with $BbbZ^3=langle x,y,zrangle $ and then quotienting out the cyclic subgroup $langle x^-2y^2z^2rangle$. You can see easily that $x^-1yz$, $y$, and $z$ are an alternate set of generators for $G$, so you get $BbbZ^2times BbbZ/2BbbZ$ generated by $y, z,$ and $x^-1yz$ when you take the quotient.
There is no need to know anything about non-abelian groups, since you can abelianize first and then mod out by the relation. (Abelianization is just modding out by some relations, and it doesn't matter which relations you mod out first--you get to the same place in the end.)
I would think of it as starting with $BbbZ^3=langle x,y,zrangle $ and then quotienting out the cyclic subgroup $langle x^-2y^2z^2rangle$. You can see easily that $x^-1yz$, $y$, and $z$ are an alternate set of generators for $G$, so you get $BbbZ^2times BbbZ/2BbbZ$ generated by $y, z,$ and $x^-1yz$ when you take the quotient.
There is no need to know anything about non-abelian groups, since you can abelianize first and then mod out by the relation. (Abelianization is just modding out by some relations, and it doesn't matter which relations you mod out first--you get to the same place in the end.)
edited Aug 20 at 15:41
answered Aug 20 at 2:54
C Monsour
4,651221
4,651221
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
If we have
$$langle x,y,z | x^-2y^2z^2=1rangle^rm ab=langle x,y,z | x^-2y^2z^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
with one of the Tietze moves
$$langle x,y,z,t | t=x^-1yz, t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
With another, now we arrange
$$langle x,y,z,t | x=yzt^-1, t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
and finally get
$$langle y,z,t | t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
which clearly is $Bbb Z+Bbb Z+Bbb Z_2$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
If we have
$$langle x,y,z | x^-2y^2z^2=1rangle^rm ab=langle x,y,z | x^-2y^2z^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
with one of the Tietze moves
$$langle x,y,z,t | t=x^-1yz, t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
With another, now we arrange
$$langle x,y,z,t | x=yzt^-1, t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
and finally get
$$langle y,z,t | t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
which clearly is $Bbb Z+Bbb Z+Bbb Z_2$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
If we have
$$langle x,y,z | x^-2y^2z^2=1rangle^rm ab=langle x,y,z | x^-2y^2z^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
with one of the Tietze moves
$$langle x,y,z,t | t=x^-1yz, t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
With another, now we arrange
$$langle x,y,z,t | x=yzt^-1, t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
and finally get
$$langle y,z,t | t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
which clearly is $Bbb Z+Bbb Z+Bbb Z_2$.
If we have
$$langle x,y,z | x^-2y^2z^2=1rangle^rm ab=langle x,y,z | x^-2y^2z^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
with one of the Tietze moves
$$langle x,y,z,t | t=x^-1yz, t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
With another, now we arrange
$$langle x,y,z,t | x=yzt^-1, t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
and finally get
$$langle y,z,t | t^2=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1rangle$$
which clearly is $Bbb Z+Bbb Z+Bbb Z_2$.
edited Aug 24 at 18:37
answered Aug 24 at 18:29
janmarqz
6,06441629
6,06441629
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2888319%2fwhat-is-the-abelianization-of-langle-x-y-z-mid-x2-y2z2-rangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
The given group is a quotient of the free group $F_3$ on three generators; consider it how it behaves under the abelianization map $F_3 to mathbbZ^3$. (Note, for example, that $G^ab$ is the maximal abelian quotient of $G$.)
â anomaly
Aug 20 at 2:27
@anomaly Thanks. I can get a presentation of the abelianization by adding relations like $xy=yx$ and so on. However is it possible to express it as a direct sum of cyclic groups as per the fundamental theorem for finitely generated abelian groups?
â yoyostein
Aug 20 at 2:44
1
keywords: Tietze transformations
â janmarqz
Aug 20 at 3:00
1
Do you know a proof for the fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups? The one I know is very much of the flavor, "Give me a presentation for the abelian group, and I will decompose it into primitive factors" - maybe your proof does that too?
â Milo Brandt
Aug 20 at 3:12
4
@janmarqz I would say that the keywords here are not Tietze transformations, but Smith Normal Form.
â Derek Holt
Aug 20 at 7:08