Is Timatic always up to date?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
7
down vote

favorite












Or, can Timatic afford to be out of date at any point in time?



It is the database airlines and immigration consult to check current visa regulations and latest changes for all the nationalities travelling to every country in the world.



Someone claimed in another post that, in a certain case, the info on timatic was out of date by many months and possibly omitted certain visa requirements available to some nationalities but not recorded there.



Could anyone please elaborate on the workings of timatic and how it is updated and whether or not its real time info can be misleading/incomplete/unclear?



Thank you!










share|improve this question

















  • 4




    "It is the database airlines and immigration consult" Airlines maybe. Immigration, certainly not. Timatic has zero legal value.
    – fkraiem
    Nov 28 '17 at 0:17










  • It'd be helpful if you could include a link to the other post.
    – martin.koeberl
    Nov 28 '17 at 2:05










  • @fkraiem, I understand timatic has no legal value and isn't binding for immigration officials but I sometimes they consult it for third country nationals to get an idea of the regulations before stamping you out of the country.
    – Marbles
    Nov 28 '17 at 5:50
















up vote
7
down vote

favorite












Or, can Timatic afford to be out of date at any point in time?



It is the database airlines and immigration consult to check current visa regulations and latest changes for all the nationalities travelling to every country in the world.



Someone claimed in another post that, in a certain case, the info on timatic was out of date by many months and possibly omitted certain visa requirements available to some nationalities but not recorded there.



Could anyone please elaborate on the workings of timatic and how it is updated and whether or not its real time info can be misleading/incomplete/unclear?



Thank you!










share|improve this question

















  • 4




    "It is the database airlines and immigration consult" Airlines maybe. Immigration, certainly not. Timatic has zero legal value.
    – fkraiem
    Nov 28 '17 at 0:17










  • It'd be helpful if you could include a link to the other post.
    – martin.koeberl
    Nov 28 '17 at 2:05










  • @fkraiem, I understand timatic has no legal value and isn't binding for immigration officials but I sometimes they consult it for third country nationals to get an idea of the regulations before stamping you out of the country.
    – Marbles
    Nov 28 '17 at 5:50












up vote
7
down vote

favorite









up vote
7
down vote

favorite











Or, can Timatic afford to be out of date at any point in time?



It is the database airlines and immigration consult to check current visa regulations and latest changes for all the nationalities travelling to every country in the world.



Someone claimed in another post that, in a certain case, the info on timatic was out of date by many months and possibly omitted certain visa requirements available to some nationalities but not recorded there.



Could anyone please elaborate on the workings of timatic and how it is updated and whether or not its real time info can be misleading/incomplete/unclear?



Thank you!










share|improve this question













Or, can Timatic afford to be out of date at any point in time?



It is the database airlines and immigration consult to check current visa regulations and latest changes for all the nationalities travelling to every country in the world.



Someone claimed in another post that, in a certain case, the info on timatic was out of date by many months and possibly omitted certain visa requirements available to some nationalities but not recorded there.



Could anyone please elaborate on the workings of timatic and how it is updated and whether or not its real time info can be misleading/incomplete/unclear?



Thank you!







visas timatic






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 27 '17 at 22:00









Marbles

677110




677110







  • 4




    "It is the database airlines and immigration consult" Airlines maybe. Immigration, certainly not. Timatic has zero legal value.
    – fkraiem
    Nov 28 '17 at 0:17










  • It'd be helpful if you could include a link to the other post.
    – martin.koeberl
    Nov 28 '17 at 2:05










  • @fkraiem, I understand timatic has no legal value and isn't binding for immigration officials but I sometimes they consult it for third country nationals to get an idea of the regulations before stamping you out of the country.
    – Marbles
    Nov 28 '17 at 5:50












  • 4




    "It is the database airlines and immigration consult" Airlines maybe. Immigration, certainly not. Timatic has zero legal value.
    – fkraiem
    Nov 28 '17 at 0:17










  • It'd be helpful if you could include a link to the other post.
    – martin.koeberl
    Nov 28 '17 at 2:05










  • @fkraiem, I understand timatic has no legal value and isn't binding for immigration officials but I sometimes they consult it for third country nationals to get an idea of the regulations before stamping you out of the country.
    – Marbles
    Nov 28 '17 at 5:50







4




4




"It is the database airlines and immigration consult" Airlines maybe. Immigration, certainly not. Timatic has zero legal value.
– fkraiem
Nov 28 '17 at 0:17




"It is the database airlines and immigration consult" Airlines maybe. Immigration, certainly not. Timatic has zero legal value.
– fkraiem
Nov 28 '17 at 0:17












It'd be helpful if you could include a link to the other post.
– martin.koeberl
Nov 28 '17 at 2:05




It'd be helpful if you could include a link to the other post.
– martin.koeberl
Nov 28 '17 at 2:05












@fkraiem, I understand timatic has no legal value and isn't binding for immigration officials but I sometimes they consult it for third country nationals to get an idea of the regulations before stamping you out of the country.
– Marbles
Nov 28 '17 at 5:50




@fkraiem, I understand timatic has no legal value and isn't binding for immigration officials but I sometimes they consult it for third country nationals to get an idea of the regulations before stamping you out of the country.
– Marbles
Nov 28 '17 at 5:50










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote














Is Timatic always up to date?




YES, to the point where travellers should not worry about it. IATA tries really, really, really hard to keep Timatic current.



Here's a fun video describing some way they do this: Timatic Sourcing



Basically, they try to maintain close relationships with the agencies responsible for entry and transit requirements and encourage them to notify IATA before any change takes place.




Or, can Timatic afford to be out of date at any point in time?




NO. No one in the industry benefits in any way from Timatic being out of date. In fact, it's a huge liability for the airlines.



To be clear, try as they do, some random bureaucrat can forget to notify IATA and cause problems. There are also some wonky situations, such as the US Passport/Turkish visa thing.




info can be misleading/incomplete/unclear?




Here's the deal with this, it doesn't matter. Timatic can be flat out wrong but there is no way to convince an airline on the spot that is the case. You can be traveling with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson himself, but if Timatic says you need a visa and don't have one, you're not going anywhere.






share|improve this answer






















  • Last year I hit a case where it was ambiguous and it took 3 agents to discuss and eventually agree that my interpretation was correct. I actually had never read the system before but that time I saw that the language they use seems deliberately ambiguous containing statements such as may be allowed.
    – Itai
    Nov 28 '17 at 3:58










  • @Itai that's probably because governments themselves use that language. As far as I'm aware, immigration officers in every country are able to deny entry to travelers even if they have all their documents in order. In any country where that's the case, careful writers avoid making absolute statements about the effect of a visa.
    – phoog
    Nov 28 '17 at 4:18










  • @JOHN-305, If there is no way to convince an airline that timatic is wrong, but is there a way to convince them that timatic is right?? There was a case when visa-free entry for certain nationalities was made available and duly updated in timatic but the dumb airline staff would not listen to the passenger pleas to consult it for up-to-date visa info and instead denied them boarding because they were not in possession of the old style sticker visa that is fast becoming obsolete. Can the passenger sue the airline?
    – Marbles
    Nov 28 '17 at 5:55






  • 1




    @Marbles If you can prove Timatic was current and demonstrate that the airline uses Timatic and the airline does not have their own policies, you at least have a case for a refund. Read the Contract of Carriage to see what it says about visas and such. A complaint to their national authority is also an option.
    – Johns-305
    Nov 28 '17 at 11:59










  • @phoog - Yes but I was in a case where Timatic said something along visitors can enter visa-free fo XX dans and may request to extend their stay at the destination country, so they were arguing about whether I was allowed a return flight coming back after the XX days. In fact, we had gone to the embassy the day before and they had told us to do that ut the agent was focused on the may, saying that they could choose not too but it would make the possible extension pointless if one had to book an earlier return flight!
    – Itai
    Nov 28 '17 at 14:34










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105908%2fis-timatic-always-up-to-date%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
7
down vote














Is Timatic always up to date?




YES, to the point where travellers should not worry about it. IATA tries really, really, really hard to keep Timatic current.



Here's a fun video describing some way they do this: Timatic Sourcing



Basically, they try to maintain close relationships with the agencies responsible for entry and transit requirements and encourage them to notify IATA before any change takes place.




Or, can Timatic afford to be out of date at any point in time?




NO. No one in the industry benefits in any way from Timatic being out of date. In fact, it's a huge liability for the airlines.



To be clear, try as they do, some random bureaucrat can forget to notify IATA and cause problems. There are also some wonky situations, such as the US Passport/Turkish visa thing.




info can be misleading/incomplete/unclear?




Here's the deal with this, it doesn't matter. Timatic can be flat out wrong but there is no way to convince an airline on the spot that is the case. You can be traveling with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson himself, but if Timatic says you need a visa and don't have one, you're not going anywhere.






share|improve this answer






















  • Last year I hit a case where it was ambiguous and it took 3 agents to discuss and eventually agree that my interpretation was correct. I actually had never read the system before but that time I saw that the language they use seems deliberately ambiguous containing statements such as may be allowed.
    – Itai
    Nov 28 '17 at 3:58










  • @Itai that's probably because governments themselves use that language. As far as I'm aware, immigration officers in every country are able to deny entry to travelers even if they have all their documents in order. In any country where that's the case, careful writers avoid making absolute statements about the effect of a visa.
    – phoog
    Nov 28 '17 at 4:18










  • @JOHN-305, If there is no way to convince an airline that timatic is wrong, but is there a way to convince them that timatic is right?? There was a case when visa-free entry for certain nationalities was made available and duly updated in timatic but the dumb airline staff would not listen to the passenger pleas to consult it for up-to-date visa info and instead denied them boarding because they were not in possession of the old style sticker visa that is fast becoming obsolete. Can the passenger sue the airline?
    – Marbles
    Nov 28 '17 at 5:55






  • 1




    @Marbles If you can prove Timatic was current and demonstrate that the airline uses Timatic and the airline does not have their own policies, you at least have a case for a refund. Read the Contract of Carriage to see what it says about visas and such. A complaint to their national authority is also an option.
    – Johns-305
    Nov 28 '17 at 11:59










  • @phoog - Yes but I was in a case where Timatic said something along visitors can enter visa-free fo XX dans and may request to extend their stay at the destination country, so they were arguing about whether I was allowed a return flight coming back after the XX days. In fact, we had gone to the embassy the day before and they had told us to do that ut the agent was focused on the may, saying that they could choose not too but it would make the possible extension pointless if one had to book an earlier return flight!
    – Itai
    Nov 28 '17 at 14:34














up vote
7
down vote














Is Timatic always up to date?




YES, to the point where travellers should not worry about it. IATA tries really, really, really hard to keep Timatic current.



Here's a fun video describing some way they do this: Timatic Sourcing



Basically, they try to maintain close relationships with the agencies responsible for entry and transit requirements and encourage them to notify IATA before any change takes place.




Or, can Timatic afford to be out of date at any point in time?




NO. No one in the industry benefits in any way from Timatic being out of date. In fact, it's a huge liability for the airlines.



To be clear, try as they do, some random bureaucrat can forget to notify IATA and cause problems. There are also some wonky situations, such as the US Passport/Turkish visa thing.




info can be misleading/incomplete/unclear?




Here's the deal with this, it doesn't matter. Timatic can be flat out wrong but there is no way to convince an airline on the spot that is the case. You can be traveling with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson himself, but if Timatic says you need a visa and don't have one, you're not going anywhere.






share|improve this answer






















  • Last year I hit a case where it was ambiguous and it took 3 agents to discuss and eventually agree that my interpretation was correct. I actually had never read the system before but that time I saw that the language they use seems deliberately ambiguous containing statements such as may be allowed.
    – Itai
    Nov 28 '17 at 3:58










  • @Itai that's probably because governments themselves use that language. As far as I'm aware, immigration officers in every country are able to deny entry to travelers even if they have all their documents in order. In any country where that's the case, careful writers avoid making absolute statements about the effect of a visa.
    – phoog
    Nov 28 '17 at 4:18










  • @JOHN-305, If there is no way to convince an airline that timatic is wrong, but is there a way to convince them that timatic is right?? There was a case when visa-free entry for certain nationalities was made available and duly updated in timatic but the dumb airline staff would not listen to the passenger pleas to consult it for up-to-date visa info and instead denied them boarding because they were not in possession of the old style sticker visa that is fast becoming obsolete. Can the passenger sue the airline?
    – Marbles
    Nov 28 '17 at 5:55






  • 1




    @Marbles If you can prove Timatic was current and demonstrate that the airline uses Timatic and the airline does not have their own policies, you at least have a case for a refund. Read the Contract of Carriage to see what it says about visas and such. A complaint to their national authority is also an option.
    – Johns-305
    Nov 28 '17 at 11:59










  • @phoog - Yes but I was in a case where Timatic said something along visitors can enter visa-free fo XX dans and may request to extend their stay at the destination country, so they were arguing about whether I was allowed a return flight coming back after the XX days. In fact, we had gone to the embassy the day before and they had told us to do that ut the agent was focused on the may, saying that they could choose not too but it would make the possible extension pointless if one had to book an earlier return flight!
    – Itai
    Nov 28 '17 at 14:34












up vote
7
down vote










up vote
7
down vote










Is Timatic always up to date?




YES, to the point where travellers should not worry about it. IATA tries really, really, really hard to keep Timatic current.



Here's a fun video describing some way they do this: Timatic Sourcing



Basically, they try to maintain close relationships with the agencies responsible for entry and transit requirements and encourage them to notify IATA before any change takes place.




Or, can Timatic afford to be out of date at any point in time?




NO. No one in the industry benefits in any way from Timatic being out of date. In fact, it's a huge liability for the airlines.



To be clear, try as they do, some random bureaucrat can forget to notify IATA and cause problems. There are also some wonky situations, such as the US Passport/Turkish visa thing.




info can be misleading/incomplete/unclear?




Here's the deal with this, it doesn't matter. Timatic can be flat out wrong but there is no way to convince an airline on the spot that is the case. You can be traveling with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson himself, but if Timatic says you need a visa and don't have one, you're not going anywhere.






share|improve this answer















Is Timatic always up to date?




YES, to the point where travellers should not worry about it. IATA tries really, really, really hard to keep Timatic current.



Here's a fun video describing some way they do this: Timatic Sourcing



Basically, they try to maintain close relationships with the agencies responsible for entry and transit requirements and encourage them to notify IATA before any change takes place.




Or, can Timatic afford to be out of date at any point in time?




NO. No one in the industry benefits in any way from Timatic being out of date. In fact, it's a huge liability for the airlines.



To be clear, try as they do, some random bureaucrat can forget to notify IATA and cause problems. There are also some wonky situations, such as the US Passport/Turkish visa thing.




info can be misleading/incomplete/unclear?




Here's the deal with this, it doesn't matter. Timatic can be flat out wrong but there is no way to convince an airline on the spot that is the case. You can be traveling with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson himself, but if Timatic says you need a visa and don't have one, you're not going anywhere.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 28 '17 at 3:28







user67108

















answered Nov 27 '17 at 23:49









Johns-305

26.5k5490




26.5k5490











  • Last year I hit a case where it was ambiguous and it took 3 agents to discuss and eventually agree that my interpretation was correct. I actually had never read the system before but that time I saw that the language they use seems deliberately ambiguous containing statements such as may be allowed.
    – Itai
    Nov 28 '17 at 3:58










  • @Itai that's probably because governments themselves use that language. As far as I'm aware, immigration officers in every country are able to deny entry to travelers even if they have all their documents in order. In any country where that's the case, careful writers avoid making absolute statements about the effect of a visa.
    – phoog
    Nov 28 '17 at 4:18










  • @JOHN-305, If there is no way to convince an airline that timatic is wrong, but is there a way to convince them that timatic is right?? There was a case when visa-free entry for certain nationalities was made available and duly updated in timatic but the dumb airline staff would not listen to the passenger pleas to consult it for up-to-date visa info and instead denied them boarding because they were not in possession of the old style sticker visa that is fast becoming obsolete. Can the passenger sue the airline?
    – Marbles
    Nov 28 '17 at 5:55






  • 1




    @Marbles If you can prove Timatic was current and demonstrate that the airline uses Timatic and the airline does not have their own policies, you at least have a case for a refund. Read the Contract of Carriage to see what it says about visas and such. A complaint to their national authority is also an option.
    – Johns-305
    Nov 28 '17 at 11:59










  • @phoog - Yes but I was in a case where Timatic said something along visitors can enter visa-free fo XX dans and may request to extend their stay at the destination country, so they were arguing about whether I was allowed a return flight coming back after the XX days. In fact, we had gone to the embassy the day before and they had told us to do that ut the agent was focused on the may, saying that they could choose not too but it would make the possible extension pointless if one had to book an earlier return flight!
    – Itai
    Nov 28 '17 at 14:34
















  • Last year I hit a case where it was ambiguous and it took 3 agents to discuss and eventually agree that my interpretation was correct. I actually had never read the system before but that time I saw that the language they use seems deliberately ambiguous containing statements such as may be allowed.
    – Itai
    Nov 28 '17 at 3:58










  • @Itai that's probably because governments themselves use that language. As far as I'm aware, immigration officers in every country are able to deny entry to travelers even if they have all their documents in order. In any country where that's the case, careful writers avoid making absolute statements about the effect of a visa.
    – phoog
    Nov 28 '17 at 4:18










  • @JOHN-305, If there is no way to convince an airline that timatic is wrong, but is there a way to convince them that timatic is right?? There was a case when visa-free entry for certain nationalities was made available and duly updated in timatic but the dumb airline staff would not listen to the passenger pleas to consult it for up-to-date visa info and instead denied them boarding because they were not in possession of the old style sticker visa that is fast becoming obsolete. Can the passenger sue the airline?
    – Marbles
    Nov 28 '17 at 5:55






  • 1




    @Marbles If you can prove Timatic was current and demonstrate that the airline uses Timatic and the airline does not have their own policies, you at least have a case for a refund. Read the Contract of Carriage to see what it says about visas and such. A complaint to their national authority is also an option.
    – Johns-305
    Nov 28 '17 at 11:59










  • @phoog - Yes but I was in a case where Timatic said something along visitors can enter visa-free fo XX dans and may request to extend their stay at the destination country, so they were arguing about whether I was allowed a return flight coming back after the XX days. In fact, we had gone to the embassy the day before and they had told us to do that ut the agent was focused on the may, saying that they could choose not too but it would make the possible extension pointless if one had to book an earlier return flight!
    – Itai
    Nov 28 '17 at 14:34















Last year I hit a case where it was ambiguous and it took 3 agents to discuss and eventually agree that my interpretation was correct. I actually had never read the system before but that time I saw that the language they use seems deliberately ambiguous containing statements such as may be allowed.
– Itai
Nov 28 '17 at 3:58




Last year I hit a case where it was ambiguous and it took 3 agents to discuss and eventually agree that my interpretation was correct. I actually had never read the system before but that time I saw that the language they use seems deliberately ambiguous containing statements such as may be allowed.
– Itai
Nov 28 '17 at 3:58












@Itai that's probably because governments themselves use that language. As far as I'm aware, immigration officers in every country are able to deny entry to travelers even if they have all their documents in order. In any country where that's the case, careful writers avoid making absolute statements about the effect of a visa.
– phoog
Nov 28 '17 at 4:18




@Itai that's probably because governments themselves use that language. As far as I'm aware, immigration officers in every country are able to deny entry to travelers even if they have all their documents in order. In any country where that's the case, careful writers avoid making absolute statements about the effect of a visa.
– phoog
Nov 28 '17 at 4:18












@JOHN-305, If there is no way to convince an airline that timatic is wrong, but is there a way to convince them that timatic is right?? There was a case when visa-free entry for certain nationalities was made available and duly updated in timatic but the dumb airline staff would not listen to the passenger pleas to consult it for up-to-date visa info and instead denied them boarding because they were not in possession of the old style sticker visa that is fast becoming obsolete. Can the passenger sue the airline?
– Marbles
Nov 28 '17 at 5:55




@JOHN-305, If there is no way to convince an airline that timatic is wrong, but is there a way to convince them that timatic is right?? There was a case when visa-free entry for certain nationalities was made available and duly updated in timatic but the dumb airline staff would not listen to the passenger pleas to consult it for up-to-date visa info and instead denied them boarding because they were not in possession of the old style sticker visa that is fast becoming obsolete. Can the passenger sue the airline?
– Marbles
Nov 28 '17 at 5:55




1




1




@Marbles If you can prove Timatic was current and demonstrate that the airline uses Timatic and the airline does not have their own policies, you at least have a case for a refund. Read the Contract of Carriage to see what it says about visas and such. A complaint to their national authority is also an option.
– Johns-305
Nov 28 '17 at 11:59




@Marbles If you can prove Timatic was current and demonstrate that the airline uses Timatic and the airline does not have their own policies, you at least have a case for a refund. Read the Contract of Carriage to see what it says about visas and such. A complaint to their national authority is also an option.
– Johns-305
Nov 28 '17 at 11:59












@phoog - Yes but I was in a case where Timatic said something along visitors can enter visa-free fo XX dans and may request to extend their stay at the destination country, so they were arguing about whether I was allowed a return flight coming back after the XX days. In fact, we had gone to the embassy the day before and they had told us to do that ut the agent was focused on the may, saying that they could choose not too but it would make the possible extension pointless if one had to book an earlier return flight!
– Itai
Nov 28 '17 at 14:34




@phoog - Yes but I was in a case where Timatic said something along visitors can enter visa-free fo XX dans and may request to extend their stay at the destination country, so they were arguing about whether I was allowed a return flight coming back after the XX days. In fact, we had gone to the embassy the day before and they had told us to do that ut the agent was focused on the may, saying that they could choose not too but it would make the possible extension pointless if one had to book an earlier return flight!
– Itai
Nov 28 '17 at 14:34

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105908%2fis-timatic-always-up-to-date%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest














































































Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Crossroads (UK TV series)

ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế