Regex. Greedy and lazy quantifiers [duplicate]

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;

-1

This question already has an answer here:

Non-greedy match is still too greedy

2 answers

I have this string:

a = 'one\two\three.txt';

I want to get "three.txt". And this:

a.match(/\(.+?)$/)

Doesn't work. Why? How can I get "three.txt"?

asked Nov 14 '18 at 4:59

Дмитрий

1113

marked as duplicate by Wiktor Stribiżew javascript
Users with the javascript badge can single-handedly close javascript questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Nov 14 '18 at 8:42

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1

Doesn't work. Why? Because it doesn't match.

– Foo
Nov 14 '18 at 5:01

So, why don't you use split? 'one\two\three.txt'.split('\')

– Foo
Nov 14 '18 at 5:04

add a comment |

-1

This question already has an answer here:

Non-greedy match is still too greedy

2 answers

I have this string:

a = 'one\two\three.txt';

I want to get "three.txt". And this:

a.match(/\(.+?)$/)

Doesn't work. Why? How can I get "three.txt"?

asked Nov 14 '18 at 4:59

Дмитрий

1113

marked as duplicate by Wiktor Stribiżew javascript
Users with the javascript badge can single-handedly close javascript questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Nov 14 '18 at 8:42

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1

Doesn't work. Why? Because it doesn't match.

– Foo
Nov 14 '18 at 5:01

So, why don't you use split? 'one\two\three.txt'.split('\')

– Foo
Nov 14 '18 at 5:04

add a comment |

-1

This question already has an answer here:

Non-greedy match is still too greedy

2 answers

I have this string:

a = 'one\two\three.txt';

I want to get "three.txt". And this:

a.match(/\(.+?)$/)

Doesn't work. Why? How can I get "three.txt"?

asked Nov 14 '18 at 4:59

Дмитрий

1113

This question already has an answer here:

Non-greedy match is still too greedy

2 answers

I have this string:

a = 'one\two\three.txt';

I want to get "three.txt". And this:

a.match(/\(.+?)$/)

Doesn't work. Why? How can I get "three.txt"?

This question already has an answer here:

Non-greedy match is still too greedy

2 answers

javascript regex

asked Nov 14 '18 at 4:59

Дмитрий

1113

asked Nov 14 '18 at 4:59

Дмитрий

1113

asked Nov 14 '18 at 4:59

Дмитрий

1113

asked Nov 14 '18 at 4:59

Дмитрий

1113

asked Nov 14 '18 at 4:59

Дмитрий

1113

marked as duplicate by Wiktor Stribiżew javascript
Users with the javascript badge can single-handedly close javascript questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Nov 14 '18 at 8:42

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

marked as duplicate by Wiktor Stribiżew javascript
Users with the javascript badge can single-handedly close javascript questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Nov 14 '18 at 8:42

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1

Doesn't work. Why? Because it doesn't match.

– Foo
Nov 14 '18 at 5:01

So, why don't you use split? 'one\two\three.txt'.split('\')

– Foo
Nov 14 '18 at 5:04

add a comment |

1

Doesn't work. Why? Because it doesn't match.

– Foo
Nov 14 '18 at 5:01

So, why don't you use split? 'one\two\three.txt'.split('\')

– Foo
Nov 14 '18 at 5:04

Doesn't work. Why? Because it doesn't match.

– Foo
Nov 14 '18 at 5:01

So, why don't you use split? 'one\two\three.txt'.split('\')

– Foo
Nov 14 '18 at 5:04

add a comment |

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

You can use this regex: [w.]+?$

Details at regex101: https://regex101.com/r/n8HyiL/1

Or remove the ? it's still ok!

answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:06

protoproto

1,013710

add a comment |

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

You can use this regex: [w.]+?$

Details at regex101: https://regex101.com/r/n8HyiL/1

Or remove the ? it's still ok!

answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:06

protoproto

1,013710

add a comment |

You can use this regex: [w.]+?$

Details at regex101: https://regex101.com/r/n8HyiL/1

Or remove the ? it's still ok!

answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:06

protoproto

1,013710

add a comment |

You can use this regex: [w.]+?$

Details at regex101: https://regex101.com/r/n8HyiL/1

Or remove the ? it's still ok!

answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:06

protoproto

1,013710

You can use this regex: [w.]+?$

Details at regex101: https://regex101.com/r/n8HyiL/1

Or remove the ? it's still ok!

answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:06

protoproto

1,013710

answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:06

protoproto

1,013710

answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:06

protoproto

1,013710

answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:06

protoproto

1,013710

add a comment |

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Dfyjkt